Пікірлер

• 
  @abogadojon12 күн бұрын

  Uh, Marty . . . May I call you "Marty"? You couldn't find time, Marty, to mention the hauntingly moving musical scores for the Ranown productions written by the great Heinz Roemheld? `

• 
  @RJB11726 күн бұрын

  He said he made it a horror film

• 
  @user-hm5gl6ll5nАй бұрын

  I'm trying to see this film, the full movie. cant get hold of it...

• 
  @alaindezii44452 ай бұрын

  Great insight on the film and process.

• 
  @13579TV2 ай бұрын

  존경합니다 !!!

• 
  @davidevan44612 ай бұрын

  I am a recovering alcoholic and I loved this movie. Keaton played such a good role of a manipulative addict. Fantastic

• 
  @MichaelMoxley-lh1wm2 ай бұрын

  ❤

• 
  @sebastianaliaga55703 ай бұрын

  Right

• 
  @jokertdk3 ай бұрын

  Warner Bros Archive Collection really needs to put out a proper blu ray of this outstanding film!

• 
  @martykeaton18228 күн бұрын

  Featuring this and the Siskel and Ebert review.

• 
  @bradojacko82473 ай бұрын

  Why would Harrison ford's character taunt hackman at the end unless Ford was in on the murder...in which case the whole story was to set up Harry since Ford was a better bugger than Harry, as proven at the end of the movie. This means the conversation was all staged to entrap harry into recording it. Which also doesnt make sense. I like the tone and idea of this movie, but Harrison ford's character seems to ruin any logical explanation for what occurs. Was it explained that Ford was in league with thr 2 on thr recording? If not, why taunt hackman at the end after those two murdered his boss rather than work with him to prove they did the crime? A if he is in league, how would he know that the recording would set his employer off and allow them to commit such a murder? And if he knew it would and was in league with the couple, why wouldn't he do the recording himself since he is found to be a superior bugger to Harry at the end?

• 
  @bradojacko82473 ай бұрын

  If Harry can't figure out who is bugging him at the end, then why does Harrison Ford need Harry to begin with? Ford knew someone better, which makes no sense.

• 
  @bradojacko82473 ай бұрын

  It makes 0 sense that Harry has a party or that he has it at his secret shop or that he is seduced by a blatant plant who is terrible at disarming any man, or that he exposes his project to everyone at the party or his competitors, or that he would listen to it with the convention woman while she is trying to sleep with him, or that he allows it to be stolen. None of it matches his character. Please explain this. It seems entirely forced.

• 
  @audas3 ай бұрын

  What the actual f*ck? Its based on the book OIL! By Upton Sinclair he didn't write it, dream it, or come up with anything. Holy smoke.

• 
  @atlittlefarm3 ай бұрын

  iThere was nothing dreamlike about the film, Louis' description sounds like he is ripping off someone else's inaccurate description of the film.

• 
  @tommygun197883 ай бұрын

  I love when Jews critique Christianity

• 
  @hi_desert_rat3 ай бұрын

  Awesome!

• 
  @donaldshotts44293 ай бұрын

  Hated this f movie. My favorite ex's 2 fav movies were TWBB and The Pianist. I watched the Pianist and the Germans are making people lay on the ground and get shot in the head one by one. I said this is your fav movie? 😂. Same woman once jumped out a moving car while I was doing about 25-30 mph. Its crazy what we'll deal with if the sex is good

• 
  @jerrycaughman63243 ай бұрын

  The more I hear from Louis CK the less I respect his opinion.

• 
  @liadcohen83273 ай бұрын

  Also, the soundtrack is incredible. It creates a mood that is so unsettling that you're on the edge of your seat the whole time wondering what could possibly happen next, while everything on screen is both grounded and gritty, and also absurd. One of the greatest films anyone has ever made.

• 
  @midoctor3 ай бұрын

  J. Greenwood, composer

• 
  @indianastarkjones15353 ай бұрын

  Said the Guy that Wacked off in Front of Women. What a Freak.... Don't shake his hands.

• 
  @christopher91963 ай бұрын

  Personally i think beating off in front of people is a little more weird

• 
  @Smacks13 ай бұрын

  I’m surprised that someone like me with a short attention span actually liked that movie lol

• 
  @RichardLucas3 ай бұрын

  Look, fuck Louis CK and not for the reason you think. Before his epic "Me Too" moment, I already thoroughly enjoyed his depth, but I immediately smelled his moralizing tone. He's an off-the-shelf, commodity comic in that he starts from a place of "I'm not good enough" and tries to drown it in public affirmation, and he happens to be actually talented. But his insecurity is far more obscene than the obvious stuff, which as a perv myself, doesn't even really bother me as much as the next guy. His analysis is always going to be unfair. And he won't ever really like you, either.

• 
  @JC-tr4gh3 ай бұрын

  Louis CK giving acting advice to anybody involved in this film including the director is comical. The self-aggrandized delusion is comical😂😂😂

• 
  @davidb66813 ай бұрын

  Every facet of this masterpiece gives me goosebumps.

• 
  @dramares3 ай бұрын

  Strange as it may be... It's not YOUR history, Louis.

• 
  @xarenian3 ай бұрын

  "Right, yeah, yeah, right, right, right"

• 
  @canderoussnurd42653 ай бұрын

  Gotta love how speaking in tongues is weird to these guys but people identifying as a cat or protestors burning down their own neighborhoods to protest the government taking away their stuff; is more evolved and higher thinking.

• 
  @kroon2753 ай бұрын

  Easily one of my favorite movies and two of my favorite performances of all time

• 
  @Elcore3 ай бұрын

  Louis C.K. opens his dressing gown in his hotel room and shouts "IOIMM FINISHHHED!" Then some intense Brahms music plays and it's the end of the movie.

• 
  @CoryFalde1753 ай бұрын

  If you want to be transported to how America used to be, read the book Harpo Speaks. Harpo Marx grew up in the 1890s, he was a young man in the early 20th century and he was a rich man from the 1920s on. He writes about what people did and how they acted before TV and radio. Nobody owned cameras back then. People were so uninhibited acted more naturally back then. The social feedback was limited to the people immediately around you, so you could be more expressive without worrying about a broader audience seeing it.

• 
  @vicvega36143 ай бұрын

  Sounds absolutely terrible.

• 
  @peep393 ай бұрын

  This movie made me aware of Paul Dano. That's why I was so stoked for The Batman

• 
  @ClifHaley4 ай бұрын

  I've never heard this movie described as "dreamlike" but it makes perfect sense.

• 
  @rolandogialdino90644 ай бұрын

  Dano didn´t have to bring anything down. He gave a masterful performance opposite Day Lewis

• 
  @ted__ryan4 ай бұрын

  The masturbator has good taste. 😂

• 
  @JordenLeonard4 ай бұрын

  Sounds like the insane woke now. Don't pretend that the bullshit today smells any sweeter.

• 
  @JSTNtheWZRD4 ай бұрын

  He was another con man that was their relationship, he tried to beat him but he didnt no he didnt🩸🎳 im finished, he was the last one - i have a competition in me.....figure it out stop overanylizing thats the answer

• 
  @a5dr34 ай бұрын

  Thought the film was extremely overrated. Maybe I need to watch again.

• 
  @StrikeTeam03163 ай бұрын

  Your life is overrated

• 
  @neilwiththereeldeel4 ай бұрын

  you actually cited Biskind 😂😂...what a pseudo intellectual pile of shit 😂😂😂

• 
  @the-ambivalent-orthographer4 ай бұрын

  the feck is he talkin' abou'?

• 
  @Edward-69093 ай бұрын

  Hes jerking his little man ego again.

• 
  @IDontBuyIt504 ай бұрын

  DDDDDRAAAAAAAAAAAAINAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEE. I drink YOOOOOUUR....well, you know.

• 
  @a_life_painted_with_color4 ай бұрын

  There Will Be Blood is based on the novel "Oil!" By Upton Sinclair. Louis CK is a dumbass

• 
  @thepagecollective4 ай бұрын

  The whole faith healing phenomena and tent revivals and speaking in tongues is hard to understand today because we are flooded with entertainment. Before radio, that was entertainment, the only game in town. You could set up a box in any small town and preach and people would watch because there wasn't even radio around.

• 
  @weirdshibainu4 ай бұрын

  It wasn't just about entertainment. Rural America at the time was very isolated with poor infrastructure ( the U.S. didn't have an interstate system) little in the way of secular state policies (welfare), underdeveloped education systems and poor medical care with mental health care virtually unknown. Religion for many was the last safety net. Unfortunately, there were those that could exploit that population with faith healing and speaking in tongues--nature abhors a vacuum. Unfortunately it was only going to get worse as this movie begins on the cusp of the Great Depression.

• 
  @thepagecollective4 ай бұрын

  @@weirdshibainu Going to your local church was about maintaining ties to your community and networking. People met their husbands and wives at local church events. People organized at church events. When a traveling preacher set up a soap box in the town square, however, it was about entertainment. When an itinerant preacher came through and set up a tent and did faith healing, it was about entertainment. There Will Be Blood was based loosely on the 1927 novel Oil! by Upton Sinclair. The milieu of the book is Southern California's oil boom of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, soap box preachers, tent rivals, soap box rabblerousers, traveling Shakespeare companies, Vaudeville, the circus, carnivals, country fairs, country dances--they all broke up the monotonous, labor-intensive grind of rural life.

• 
  @HiResDez4 ай бұрын

  It's not a crazy fever dream it's an allegorical film about the ruthlessness of capitalism

• 
  @asher93494 ай бұрын

  and yet here you are...

• 
  @MrVisde4 ай бұрын

  Paul Dano was okay. But as Tarantino pointed out, DDL needed someone to play his equal. Both characters are swindlers. Imagine that role with someone like Christian Bale or Joaquin Phoenix playing off of DDL.

• 
  @rickythedrawer4 ай бұрын

  Dano was the weakest part of that movie. Bad casting, to put him up against DD Lewis was ridiculous.

• 
  @timma90274 ай бұрын

  I really liked the old/wise swindler vs young/ambitious swindler. It required a young actor and who the hell could go up against DDL anyway? The kid did the best he could but yeah it wasn't perfect. Damn I loved that movie though. The intro alone...just one man alone in silence vs dirt and stone. TWBB is in my top 5 ever I think.

• 
  @rickythedrawer3 ай бұрын

  @@timma9027 it’s my favorite movie of all time. But all of Dano’s scenes are just comical. I can’t take him serious.

• 
  @timma90273 ай бұрын

  @@rickythedrawer So what bugged me was Eli and Paul being twins and that never being established on screen. Twins in the same house but never together, never at the dinner table, Paul not seated next to his family in church while Eli preached, never on screen together. So as a viewer I'm left with "Is this a bit? Dual personality? I don't get it."

• 
  @robkeaton61434 ай бұрын

  Now if we can just get Daniel Day Lewis to do an unfunny set at the Comedy Store the circle will be complete.

• 
  @speakFILM.4 ай бұрын

  🤣😂

• 
  @Studeb4 ай бұрын

  I've always thought that the AI part of the movie was interesting, but added nothing to the whole space evolution, or whatever those monoliths were about, it should have been another film.

• 
  @speakFILM.4 ай бұрын

  That’s the intrigue and mystery of his work especially a film like Full Metal Jacket. You’re right. They’re almost like two different films. Thanks for watching - Cheers!

• 
  @goofballbiscuits36474 ай бұрын

  The book is a century old...