Пікірлер

• 
  @fallem3314Күн бұрын

  I'm an quality engineer with about 8 years experience and never took any of ASQ examination I'm planning to take CQE or CQPA but I don't know which one should I choose .... some of my friends told me to take CQE because it cover all the aspects in CQPA but 1. I don't want to miss anything on the other hand 2. I don't want to waste my time and money on taking certificates that can be in only one or two. 3. I don't want to fail in exam because I started in the difficult one Please advice me Thanks

• 
  @Letter2Mgmt3 күн бұрын

  Brilliant video. Thanks so much

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 күн бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!

• 
  @xxemmaxx2110915 күн бұрын

  Thank you!!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy4 күн бұрын

  You're welcome!

• 
  @renesubieta286212 күн бұрын

  where is the Excel file for the calculations? I do not understand how to calculate GM the grand mean

• 
  @greenbeltacademy4 күн бұрын

  The grand mean is simply the average of all of the measured values within the experiment.

• 
  @sargamkapoor189913 күн бұрын

  Great information

• 
  @greenbeltacademy4 күн бұрын

  Thanks for the comment!

• 
  @Brad-qw1te15 күн бұрын

  How different is this process when you do an attribute MSA rather than a variable MSA? For example I have a camera that tells me if a part is good or no good. The problem is the camera is giving false rejects so my boss asked me to do an MSA/Gauge R&R on it. I feel like a lot of the calculations in this video wouldn't work on the binary data I am going to get but I could be wrong.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Great question Brad! So the process is very different when you're dealing with attribute data. Google "Attribute Agreement Analysis" to understand how to quantify the variation in a measurement system when you're dealing with attribute data.

• 
  @muhaiminulrahi51317 күн бұрын

  It was very helpful.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy17 күн бұрын

  Good, I'm glad you enjoyed it!

• 
  @jrrodz7717 күн бұрын

  Hello, first of all, thanks for this excellent video. I'm interested in the practice exams. How can I acquire them?

• 
  @learnwithob19 күн бұрын

  I need to request a refund from my school fees because you explained that my lecturer used 2 hours to confuse me in 30 minutes, and it was awesome

• 
  @greenbeltacademy17 күн бұрын

  hahahaha thanks!!! I appreciate that! I'm happy to help!

• 
  @marmarbinkz705122 күн бұрын

  Do I need to know calculus (or higher?) for this?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy21 күн бұрын

  No, not at all! Statistics is the primary (and highest) math concept on the green belt exam.

• 
  @koparka11223 күн бұрын

  Very useful, thank you.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy23 күн бұрын

  Glad it was helpful!

• 
  @user-ji4np3rq5g24 күн бұрын

  Thank you sir🎉

• 
  @greenbeltacademy23 күн бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!

• 
  @sonandpets121527 күн бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @greenbeltacademy27 күн бұрын

  You're welcome!

• 
  @sonandpets121528 күн бұрын

  This is a new concept to me Andy. Thanks so much!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy27 күн бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!

• 
  @sonandpets121529 күн бұрын

  Thank you Andy!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy27 күн бұрын

  You're welcome!

• 
  @minimalsoАй бұрын

  great info and presentation, very well summarized! thanks, as an engineer with couple years experience in manufacturing and a masters I was confused as to whether to go for the Green Belt or CQE. I have decided to take the Green Belt first.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy23 күн бұрын

  I think you're got a great plan!

• 
  @Sawdust6666Ай бұрын

  Thank you that was superbly done. Massive help for my assessment

• 
  @CQEAcademyАй бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!

• 
  @AlinaRudolphАй бұрын

  Hi, I only received the version A of your cheat sheet. There is no formula for the takt time on mine.

• 
  @CQEAcademyАй бұрын

  That's odd, let me go in and double check that - you should have Rev B. If you're on my email list, hit reply to one of those emails and I'll send over the latest revision.

• 
  @AlinaRudolphАй бұрын

  @@CQEAcademy Never mind. I passed the ASQ exam today. Thanks for the cheat sheet. Even this version did the job. Felt more confident with it.

• 
  @CQEAcademyАй бұрын

  @@AlinaRudolph Congratulations on passing the exam!!!

• 
  @arishmahmood8581Ай бұрын

  One of the best teacher in my life. He made complicated thing like a cake

• 
  @CQEAcademyАй бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @ayujasАй бұрын

  Best explanation so far, really great job!!

• 
  @greenbeltacademyАй бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @jai.jai.jaishreeАй бұрын

  Very well explained especially the null hypothesis :-) THank you

• 
  @greenbeltacademyАй бұрын

  Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it!

• 
  @vishal_prajapatiАй бұрын

  How to find cycle time

• 
  @andyrobertson566Ай бұрын

  Cycle time must be measured. Get a stopwatch, and observe each step in your process and take repeated measurements of that process to estimate the average cycle time.

• 
  @md.hussainmaniyar514615 күн бұрын

  To find the cycle time in a manufacturing process, you can follow these steps: 1. **Identify the Start and End Points**: Clearly define the start and end points of the cycle you want to measure. This could be the time from when a workpiece enters the production line to when it exits as a finished product. 2. **Measure the Total Time**: Record the total time taken for the process from start to finish. This can be done by timing a single complete cycle or by averaging the time taken over several cycles. 3. **Consider All Elements**: Include all elements of the cycle, such as: - Processing time (the time when the work is actively being done) - Wait time (when the workpiece is waiting between stages) - Setup time (if any) - Any other delays or stoppages 4. **Calculate Average Cycle Time**: If measuring over multiple cycles, add up the total time for all cycles and divide by the number of cycles to get the average cycle time. The formula for average cycle time is: \[ \text{Average Cycle Time} = \frac{\text{Total Time}}{\text{Number of Cycles}} \] For example, if you observed five cycles and recorded the times as 10 minutes, 12 minutes, 11 minutes, 13 minutes, and 14 minutes: \[ \text{Total Time} = 10 + 12 + 11 + 13 + 14 = 60 \text{ minutes} \] \[ \text{Number of Cycles} = 5 \] \[ \text{Average Cycle Time} = \frac{60}{5} = 12 \text{ minutes} \] This average cycle time gives you a good understanding of how long it takes, on average, to complete one cycle in your manufacturing process.

• 
  @dmaradiaga44Ай бұрын

  Very informative 3 videos.... thank you!

• 
  @CQEAcademyАй бұрын

  Thanks so much!!! I"m glad you enjoyed that video!

• 
  @dmaradiaga44Ай бұрын

  Great video, very useful information, thank you so much!!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Glad you enjoyed that video!

• 
  @lathaanil4750Ай бұрын

  Hey.. i was not able to access the cheat sheet with the link. Where can i get a good one for the exam

• 
  @kimicog.2099Ай бұрын

  What’s the differences between the green belt E-learning vs green belt certification? I’m on the ASQ website but both look like they are online.

• 
  @greenbeltacademyАй бұрын

  The Green Belt Certification is the actual exam you have to pass to become a certified green belt. The E-learning is an online course to help you prepare for that exam.

• 
  @EvilGreens2 ай бұрын

  Did you remove the Gauge R&R spreadsheet?

• 
  @greenbeltacademyАй бұрын

  No you should be able to find it here: www.Greenbeltacademy.com/GaugeR&R

• 
  @shuyiyu41132 ай бұрын

  Best ANOVA explanation in YT!!! Love how you repeated key concept again and again, now its completely clarified from the confusion i got before watching.

• 
  @greenbeltacademyАй бұрын

  Thank you!!!

• 
  @user-kw5tb7ff7o2 ай бұрын

  Hey mate, I have certain independent values(Laying speed, force, Torque, acceleration and deceleration). I want to do an DoE. Now these are the process parameters of the machine, which has 16 heads. These 16 heads can be controlled simultaneous. Id like to use 3 of them and test the parameters on each of them. Besides that, the tape may vary aswell, since it can be wider or thicker and it's up to the producer. How do I setup my DoE Plan?

• 
  @kennedykalaluka24702 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much. Enjoyed the lecture.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  You're most welcome!

• 
  @user-rt3of5lc1u2 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  You're welcome!

• 
  @robertgernat22362 ай бұрын

  You really changed my prospect toward biostatistics ( MD. by the way ), getting my Masters in Clinical Research. I really enjoyed it , believe me. Thank you. Really!!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Great to hear that, thank you!

• 
  @SH-py9ou2 ай бұрын

  I do not understand the order of the videos. Why they are not ordered according to the syllabus?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  You're talking about the videos on the youtube channel? I believe those are ordered based on how I upload them, not necessarily the body of knowledge

• 
  @moosemoss26452 ай бұрын

  There’s something to be said for seeing it all broken down. It’s my pet peeve when someone treats a stats tool like a black box then ties their colours to the mast without appreciation of all the out falls and inner workings. Great video, I’ve often wondered how to cross validate duplicate tool performance correctly and now I know.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Glad you enjoyed that video!

• 
  @moosemoss26452 ай бұрын

  If the measurement itself is a combination of operator decision making and the tool is the analysis still valid?

• 
  @moosemoss26452 ай бұрын

  If you are looking to reject or accept product against a tolerance what range of parts should I choose for my study? Spread the tolerance or spread over the known historical process variation? I’ve been told tolerance but as the process is capable I need to misprocess to generate the arts that cover the tolerance.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  It depends on which analysis method you choose! If you're going to use the % of Process Variation metric, then having parts that span your entire process range is a must!

• 
  @moosemoss26452 ай бұрын

  @@greenbeltacademy shouldn’t I be using the tolerance % for inspection? If it depends then on what grounds so you not have to have parts that span the spec?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  @@moosemoss2645 great question, I think in a perfect world, you'd attempt to have parts that span both the design tolerance and the known historical process variation. Also, yes, if you're using the gauge for conformance (product control) then yes getting parts that span the design tolerance is important to demonstrate that your precision is acceptable across the entire design tolerance.

• 
  @moosemoss26452 ай бұрын

  @@greenbeltacademy thanks. Part of me doesn’t doubt that measuring over the design tolerance is the correct way but on the other hand if you have to misprocess to make the parts to fill this spread then use the historical deviation in your calcs it feels kind of strange.

• 
  @msfasha2 ай бұрын

  Focused, Clear and Informative, Thanks.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much!

• 
  @tranphuongthao17992 ай бұрын

  I have question that doing CQE for Lean six sigma if there are 2 years experience?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  For CQE the requirement is 8 years, and for Green Belt (LSS) it's 3 years. Did that answer your question?

• 
  @Error_Mode12192 ай бұрын

  hands down fantastic video 👏👏👏please don't stop making awesome videos like this sir

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!

• 
  @tanjason722 ай бұрын

  Hi Andy, how repeatability 12.10% + reproducibility 25.19% = Total GRNR 27.95%? I thought the sum would be 37.29%?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Because when adding up variance (in standard deviation) we don't simply add the percentages, we must convert them to variance first, then add them up. Also, the total percentages do not add up to 100% for this same reason.

• 
  @chenfan35152 ай бұрын

  very clear explanation!!! I now know what is ANOVA 🥰 (learned it several times but unclear about its core meaning 😮‍💨

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Awesome!

• 
  @kungfuball982 ай бұрын

  I am interested in full factorial video too

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the feedback!

• 
  @user-tl1zg4vl7c2 ай бұрын

  The data doesn't "prove it," but rather, suggests it... because a Type One error is still possible. That's why we say reject the null hypothesis and not disprove the null hypothesis. The reject/fail-to-reject language points to the difference between proof and evidence. But still... a very nice video!

• 
  @michaeljhonramos48232 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much!!!! This is very helpful I hope you will discuss more in statistics like One way to two way anova, chi square and etc.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Great suggestion!

• 
  @sonandpets12152 ай бұрын

  Happy to see you Mr. CQE Academy great instructor!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Thank you kindly!

• 
  @vini2027102 ай бұрын

  awesome. Thank u so much

• 
  @CQEAcademy2 ай бұрын

  You're welcome!

• 
  @greenbeltacademy13 күн бұрын

  Most welcome 😊

• 
  @LeonCui-rt9xb2 ай бұрын

  I still cannot understand the AV calculation; why d2=1.912? If the subgroup size=3, the number of combinations of parts and operators (g) = 10 parts and 3 Operators = 10*3=30. Based on the d2 table, we can know that the d2=1.693 instead of 1.192. Can you explain why d2=1.192 in detail in your case study?

• 
  @LeonCui-rt9xb2 ай бұрын

  Why n=10 but d2=1.912? If n=10 in your calculation, does that mean d2=1.716?

• 
  @CQEAcademy2 ай бұрын

  Great question - and that's a tricky part of the whole process, so in that reproducibility calculation we use n = 10 because that sample size is used as an adjustment factor to essentially eliminate EV from the AV calculation. However when using the table to look up the d2 factor for AV you use a different perspective.

• 
  @kungfuball982 ай бұрын

  Does this still apply to 2024 exam?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  Yes it does!

• 
  @kungfuball982 ай бұрын

  I have the sample exam questions from ASQ, do you think that accurately reflects what is going to be asked?

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  @@kungfuball98 If you're talking about the Study Guide, they just updated it and I haven't gone through it to truly give it a good evaluation, so unfortunately I'm not sure.

• 
  @kungfuball982 ай бұрын

  @@greenbeltacademy not a problem! After taking the exam do you think the exam is pretty straight forward? Are there a lot of calculations?

• 
  @pattyh.w.96592 ай бұрын

  THANK YOU!!! Fantastic video that helps get some clear details on the framework. Deserves thousands of likes.

• 
  @greenbeltacademy2 ай бұрын

  You're absolutely welcome!