Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University offers J.D. and Masters of Law degrees in both Environmental and International Law, as well as a Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) in Environmental Law. The school, housed on the University’s campus in White Plains, NY, opened its doors in 1976 and has over 9,000 alumni around the world. The school maintains a unique philosophy and approach to legal education that strikes an important balance between practice and theory. Haub Law launched its Environmental Law Program in 1978, and it has long been ranked among the world’s leading university programs, with a current #1 ranking by U.S. News & World Report.

Blaine Sloan Lecture 2023

Blaine Sloan Lecture 2023

Пікірлер

  • @williambines4758
    @williambines47588 күн бұрын

    Cohen has more evidence it’s about to really blow up

  • @williambines4758
    @williambines47588 күн бұрын

    Defense has proven noting prosecutors hv already proven there case hope nothing goes wrong

  • @williambines4758
    @williambines47588 күн бұрын

    They keep saying president trump he’s not president stop it already wow

  • @JoelGrant-ie4ly
    @JoelGrant-ie4ly8 күн бұрын

    Simple deflection by the Democratic party to turn the public's attention away from Crooked Joe Biden.

  • @Gladys-yv6nt
    @Gladys-yv6nt8 күн бұрын

    WHY DONT YOU TALK ABOUT THE SO MANY GOST COMPANIES JOE AND SON ESTABLISH TO COLLECT MONEY FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD BY SELLING THE BI:DEN BRAND

  • @Gladys-yv6nt
    @Gladys-yv6nt8 күн бұрын

    DREAM ON GRANDPAS

  • @johnmanheimer8006
    @johnmanheimer80069 күн бұрын

    Here's the real crime...GET TRUMP NO MATTER WHAT EVEN IF THERE IS NO CRIME. Andy McCarthy, a brilliant lawyer has stated that there is no actual crime.

  • @TTraveller3
    @TTraveller311 күн бұрын

    Trump is not in court to defend his crimes…. He is guilty…. Everyone in the world knows that - even Trump! Trump is in court to fight for his right to be a criminal!!!! Trump is a grifter! A conman!

  • @user-ez2wl4ov5p
    @user-ez2wl4ov5p2 ай бұрын

    Professor Gershman is the best!

  • @maryseal7343
    @maryseal73432 ай бұрын

    Go home you left something there

  • @damonfisher5984
    @damonfisher59844 ай бұрын

    It just makes me sick that some Asian people think black people that get into these institutions are not smart, or didn't work hard to achieve that accomplishment.

  • @user-cd8ku8dp6n
    @user-cd8ku8dp6n4 ай бұрын

    Oh destroyed that news school bull crap!

  • @user-cd8ku8dp6n
    @user-cd8ku8dp6n4 ай бұрын

    Puckers!

  • @user-cd8ku8dp6n
    @user-cd8ku8dp6n4 ай бұрын

    Can I have my grant money back Mistro thief's?

  • @user-jo3wu7qj1h
    @user-jo3wu7qj1h6 ай бұрын

    Good thing Fox has $2.7 Bn to hand over to Smartmatic!! Ha ha ha 💰💰💰💰💰👮‍♂️💰💩🐀

  • @user-ez2wl4ov5p
    @user-ez2wl4ov5p8 ай бұрын

    Thank you, Professor Gershman!

  • @dw7312
    @dw73129 ай бұрын

    Thomas is damaged after Anita Hill and have gone after the Black community.

  • @dw7312
    @dw73129 ай бұрын

    Lies on top of lies Black peoples make 1600 on SATS. ITS White folk who blocking your admissions BIT who are you a one thing test score sees you as a shoe In. Asians will not get a white card give it up. You shouldn’t want it. It’s blood stained

  • @user-yy3gk5eq3n
    @user-yy3gk5eq3n9 ай бұрын

    My iPad no good right now it’s older I can’t type smooth same before

  • @user-yy3gk5eq3n
    @user-yy3gk5eq3n9 ай бұрын

    People around me told never. Told me clever but they say I’m silly same word. Of my employers

  • @user-yy3gk5eq3n
    @user-yy3gk5eq3n9 ай бұрын

    Long time should stop absurd

  • @user-yy3gk5eq3n
    @user-yy3gk5eq3n9 ай бұрын

    But I’m not no time livelihood will. Problem

  • @user-yy3gk5eq3n
    @user-yy3gk5eq3n9 ай бұрын

    You. Want me go to you game

  • @gunorijssel7987
    @gunorijssel79879 ай бұрын

    I'm so sorry that this discussion has left out the underlying assumption of nullifying 'affirmative action: THAT BY DOING SO YOU END UP HAVING AN EQUAL LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. Just this outrageous suggestion that WHITES are SOLELY allowed in on MERITS, can easily be proven wrong. For it contradicts the STATISTICS: NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL.

  • @robyn7287
    @robyn728710 ай бұрын

    Could there just be more scholarships available for students who need extra help to attend a good college, university. However marks must be the first requirement

  • @MrFolky77
    @MrFolky7710 ай бұрын

    Oh Iunderstand how Ketanji Brown Jackson made it to the Supreme Court, now! 😂

  • @damonfisher5984
    @damonfisher59844 ай бұрын

    So what is your understanding? Enlighten me please.

  • @MrFolky77
    @MrFolky774 ай бұрын

    ​​@@damonfisher5984The fact that she is black, and a woman... that is WHY she made it that far, bc of "affirmative action". When you see that such a person CANNOT describe what a woman is, you know everything you need to know!

  • @MrFolky77
    @MrFolky7710 ай бұрын

    Well, they're just gonna have to work harder, for God's sake! smh

  • @parameciumbrains
    @parameciumbrains10 ай бұрын

    This video talks about this a bit better. kzread.info/dash/bejne/kWynzaxvdpi0eaQ.html

  • @namshon56
    @namshon5610 ай бұрын

    Why no Asian representation here

  • @ronaldpinard6285
    @ronaldpinard628510 ай бұрын

    Does affirmative action prove african Americans are cant achieve without massa helping hand, because blacks from the Caribbean are high achievers despite being descendants of slaves

  • @robert-zg8or
    @robert-zg8or10 ай бұрын

    Katanga (?) Doesn't know the difference between a boy and a girl. Does she know the difference between blacks and Asians?

  • @alleyepublishing8017
    @alleyepublishing801710 ай бұрын

    Different Levels of Racism (1) Structural Racism in the U.S. is the normalization and legitimization of an array of dynamics--historical, cultural, institutional and interpersonal--that routinely advantage whites while producing cumulative and chronic adverse outcomes for people of color. Structural racism encompasses the entire system of white domination, diffused and infused in all aspects of society, including its history, culture, politics, economics and entire social fabric. Structural racism is more difficult to locate in a particular institution because it involves the reinforcing effects of multiple institutions and cultural norms, past and present, continually reproducing old, and producing new forms of racism. Structural racism is the most profound and pervasive form of racism-all other forms of racism emerge from structural racism. (2) Institutional Racism-unequal impacts and outcomes based on race, produced by key societal institutions such as the health care and housing systems, and education and employment systems. These institutions are racist when the impact of their policies, practices and power is to advantage and disadvantage whole groups of people along racial lines. When an individual acts within the context of an institution, and help to perpetuate these racial inequities, these actions are no longer just interpersonal actions, but rather institutional actions. (Thus, when a police officer treats a member of the public with racial bias--such as giving white people the benefit of the doubt while presuming people of color are guilty-- this action is institutional racism since the police officer is acting as a representative of a law enforcement institution.) Unequal impacts based on race are the measure of institutional racism, regardless of whether or not the disproportionate and discriminatory effects are intentional. Institutional racism is not just carried out by white people but also by people of color acting in institutional capacities, "just doing their jobs" and implementing decisions that have a negative effect on people of color. (3) Individual/Internalized Racism-personal and private attitudes and beliefs about race influenced by the dominant culture. Manifestations include: race-based xenophobia (based on fear and ignorance of people unlike yourself), internalized oppression (acceptance of negative stereotypes and deflated images about yourself and those in your racial group), and internalized white privilege (a well-developed sense of entitlement; or acceptance of inflated or superior images of yourself and those in your racial group). Definition of “Racial Justice”: •Racial Justice is the proactive reinforcement of policies, practices, attitudes and actions that produce equitable power, opportunities, treatment, impacts and outcomes for all. Equitable impacts and outcome across race is the key indicator of racial justice. • Racial Justice is not the same as racial diversity. There can be diversity without equity. Integration is certainly beneficial, but not sufficient to produce equity. For example, in 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the integration of all public schools. Yet our schools remain highly unequal. Even fully and partially integrated schools, experience racial “achievement gaps” and other disparities across race. A “diversity” focus primarily addresses the symptoms of racism--with the goal of minimizing racial tensions and maximizing people’s ability to tolerate difference and get along. A “racial justice focus primarily addresses the causes of inequality and the solutions and strategies for producing equity. • Racial Justice is not the same as multi-culturalism. Culture is only one aspect of race. Another, even more significant aspect of race, is power. Race is a social construct that stems from differences in power--imbalances and abuses of power that underlie the categories of race and the culture of racism. Efforts to promote cultural awareness, sensitivity and inclusiveness are important steps towards, but are not the same as, racial justice. If one ignores the dynamics of power and simply treats race as a cultural phenomenon, racism will be perpetuated, even if things appear to be more multi-cultural. • Racial Justice is not simply equality. Things can be equal, but still not fair. For example, schools with the highest concentrations of students of color, often have a disproportionate number of students who need subsidized meals, special education services and bilingual education services. These schools require more funding than schools that have more wealthy and white students. Rather than each school receive the same--or equal--funding, schools should receive fair--or equitable--funding, based on need. Diversity = Variety Equality = Sameness Equity = Fairness, Justice

  • @alleyepublishing8017
    @alleyepublishing801710 ай бұрын

    Techniques for nonviolently REVEALING racism: 1. Naming: explicitly mentioning race by name--using words such as “racism,” “racial inequality,” “racial discrimination,” “racial bias,” etc. --so that racism gets acknowledged and addressed. 2. Framing: using a racial frame to describe an issue--e.g. “racial profiling,” “environmental racism,” “transit racism,” “racial redlining,” "real estate racism," etc.--so that institutional accountability and policy change becomes a central focus of the debate. 3. Explaining: making the existence of racism easily understandable and believable by: •Using concrete evidence, •Pointing out patterns, connections and causes •Placing the focus of attention on institutional targets, •Appealing to people’s core values of fairness, •Borrowing legitimacy and moral authority from respected sources, • Using irrefutable personal stories to illustrate systemic patterns, etc.

  • @alleyepublishing8017
    @alleyepublishing801710 ай бұрын

    Beware of these Top 10 Techniques used to CONCEAL the system of white supremacy racism: 1. Denying: totally ignoring racism or simply asserting that racism does not exist. 2. Deflecting: insisting that any inequality is based on class, culture, ethnicity, family values… anything, but race. Or using words like “diversity” or “ethnicity” when you’re really talking about race -- because any acknowledgement of race may be an admission that there’s racism. 3. Coding: using certain words, symbols and images to evoke racial fears--but not explicitly mentioning race--so as not to appear racist. (Words such as “gang member,” “illegal alien,” and “welfare queen”--all frequently associated with images of people of color--are routinely and strategically inserted into policy debates. Political ads--such as President Bush Sr.’s use of the Willie Horton ad to conjure up white fears of black men, or former California Governor Pete Wilson’s ads of undocumented immigrants--were racist tools used to win elections.) 4. Confusing: cleverly appointing token Black people to positions to act as spokespersons or leaders to promote and justify racist measures or deny that something is racist. 5. Personalizing: blaming individuals, instead of institutions, for anything that may seem unequal or racist. 6. Exceptionalizing: acknowledging that there may be an extremist or “bad apple” responsible for a racist act, but never conceding that there is any institutional accountability or systemic inequality. 7. Scapegoating: holding people who are adversely affected by racism responsible for their own plight, blaming things on their “pathological” value and lifestyles, such as laziness, promiscuity or lack of “personal responsibility.” 8. Mythologizing: appealing to the great American myths: anyone who tries can succeed (myth of meritocracy); everyone/everything is equal (myth of the level playing field), or race is irrelevant (colorblind myth), etc. 9. Decontextualizing: ignoring the context of racism so that things appear to be isolated incidents, rather than part of a pattern or bigger picture. The evening television news is notorious for this, portraying, for example, a violent crime in a black neighborhood without any examination of the causes or.context. Similarly, when white people raise charges of so-called “reverse racism,” it ignores history, white privilege and the ongoing existence of a very uneven playing field. 10. Lying: simply asserting that racism doesn’t exist even when you know it does. It’s easier to lie since telling the truth might mean having to admit responsibility. In fact, sometimes the bigger the lie, the more people believe it.

  • @BKent-tb7zo
    @BKent-tb7zo10 ай бұрын

    Also, what ever happened to the Supreme Court Abortion leak. The FBI cannot find the person as well as the Ashley Biden diary, the FBI raided O'Keefe's with mid morning swat and then no one mentioned it again. What was that about. Also, now I bet the Secret Service does not find out who hid the cocaine in the WH.

  • @BKent-tb7zo
    @BKent-tb7zo10 ай бұрын

    Hey CNN, what do you have to say about the video that Dr. Gal Luft put out re, he is a Biden whistle blower in hiding. No mention from the fake press about that huge espose' video Luft put out yesterday. No, lets trash Trump. Dr. Gal Luft, first revealed the Chinese, Biden collusion prior to the 2020 presidential election and because of his whistleblowing, the FBI went after him as an arms agent against the U.S. Luft is in hiding, fearing for his life and the U.S. DOJ, who has covered up Luft's information. Wake up America. We have such a corrupt main stream video and DOJ. This stuff is scary.

  • @duinay3
    @duinay310 ай бұрын

    Plenty of room for black and Hispanic students - just get rid of legacy admissions

  • @basedlawyer5147
    @basedlawyer514710 ай бұрын

    Or maybe they can just get in on merit

  • @DO-fo5pm
    @DO-fo5pm8 ай бұрын

    How about we end affirmative action AND legacy admissions and base admission on merit. Everyone wins

  • @Ottovontubes
    @Ottovontubes10 ай бұрын

    The glaring hole in Thomas' response about AA in 2007 is WHO was discounting his Yale degree? It wasn't black people. He was looking for approval from white people and they were telling him he didn't deserve it and he bought into their lies. Maybe if he wasn't attempting to get the approval of white bigots he wouldn't think so little of himself.

  • @canadianmonte
    @canadianmonte10 ай бұрын

    The normal, level headed Americans MUST take their country back from the hateful, corrupt, sociopathic “Christian” “Republicans” before they go any further down this destructive! Death cults be deathing after all!

  • @garymastronardi8080
    @garymastronardi8080 Жыл бұрын

    “Embarrassment to the state”??? It was the disruptive actions of these two legislators, and nothing else, that constituted an embarrassment to the state. A full trial of the two wasn’t needed. The offenses were committed right in front, and in the plain view, of the legislators who ultimately voted to exclude the two. KKK has nothing to do with anything that happened in the Tenn legislature. Sir, you are a race-baiter. You should not be teaching anyone law 😅

  • @generationgap416
    @generationgap416 Жыл бұрын

    Fake expert. Russian is not a member of Rome Statues

  • @Anthony-qy6ml
    @Anthony-qy6ml Жыл бұрын

    International "Criminal" Court* You guys are a HOOT !!!! What is this, 'Comedy Hour' ? Id**ts !!

  • @kyemoamina2011
    @kyemoamina2011 Жыл бұрын

    Nonsense. Arrest Bush and Obama look what they did in Iraq Libya Syria Afghanistan and more...

  • @iddrisibrahim9924
    @iddrisibrahim9924 Жыл бұрын

    😂😂😂😂😂😂funny ICC 🎉🎉😂😂😂

  • @tonycool4168
    @tonycool4168 Жыл бұрын

    Try to stop putin u will have war 3

  • @r.f.hopkins8163
    @r.f.hopkins8163 Жыл бұрын

    New low is an understatement. Suggests partisanship is an understatement. The Court is now obstructing justice, andThomas is a co-conspirator in crime.

  • @karrithebestlira3085
    @karrithebestlira3085 Жыл бұрын

    But the Justices could not care less what the lowly plebes think of them.

  • @rathertiredofthemess2841
    @rathertiredofthemess2841 Жыл бұрын

    They will learn.

  • @DanielleKingdjdinosaur
    @DanielleKingdjdinosaur Жыл бұрын

    They have ethics?

  • @rathertiredofthemess2841
    @rathertiredofthemess2841 Жыл бұрын

    Some of them do…3 of the 7. The rest are Republican/Federalist Society, also known as the Deep State, treasonous monsters 3 of whom should be null a void due to being appointed by an Insurrectionist president with the intent of using them to hold power.

  • @samsantucci1044
    @samsantucci1044 Жыл бұрын

    The next step will be what was done by Hitler in Germany where the normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. In 1933, police power became independent of judicial controls. Protective custody meant the arrest-without judicial review- of real and potential opponents of the regime. In Protective custody" prisoners were not confined within the normal prison system but in concentration camps under the exclusive authority of the SS. the normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. The normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. After the Nazi rise to power in 1933, the German system of justice underwent "coordination" (alignment with Nazi goals). All professional associations involved with the administration of justice were merged into the National Socialist League of German Jurists. To make a long systematic story short, In April 1933, Hitler passed one of the earliest antisemitic laws, purging Jewish and also Socialist judges, lawyers, and other court officers from their professions. Carl Schmitt, advocated the nazification of German law, cleansing it of "Jewish influence." Judges were enjoined to let "healthy folk sentiment" (gesundes Volksempfinden) guide them in their decisions. Judges were enjoined to let "healthy folk sentiment". The worst came Under Roland Freisler, Hitler chief executioner, the People's Court became part of the Nazi system of terror, condemning tens of thousands of people as "Volk Vermin" and thousands more to death for "Volk Treason." The American courts have already been weaponized by Trump and if the GOP continue to make advances in the house and the Senate, the complete transformation to an American FASCIST POLICE STATE will become a reality!

  • @simonbacaltos5660
    @simonbacaltos5660 Жыл бұрын

    It seems this radical right winger court is running amok. If there is true check and balance, so who checks unethical and illegal behavior of supreme court justices.