Пікірлер

• 
  @israelmohr3 ай бұрын

  *promosm*

• 
  @dptll19965 ай бұрын

  Great training.

• 
  @vannikuhs6747 ай бұрын

  *Promo SM*

• 
  @karlazapata24399 ай бұрын

  Thanks so much for this training. It was very clear and helpful❤

• 
  @CCAFO10 ай бұрын

  It is good to have it!

• 
  @lloydcoleman7250 Жыл бұрын

  😱😱😱😱😱!!! Want likes? Check *promosm*.

• 
  @judyhansen3469 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for this excellent introduction to risk. Very thoughtful and very well presented. Excellent job Leslie!

• 
  @integralorg4054 Жыл бұрын

  So glad you liked it!

• 
  @kathymitchell36112 жыл бұрын

  I found this session very informative as a step in gaining greater knowledge about Board's - thank you IntegralOrg

• 
  @idali242 жыл бұрын

  Excellent and very informative. Thank you :)

• 
  @whaleoilbeefhooked38923 жыл бұрын

  Hi. I missed the live webinar. Refusal of volunteers to be vaccinated is a personal choice and I know it's controversial but, Dr. Robert Malone the inventor of the mRNA vaccine was interviewed on UTube channel "DarkHorse Clips" where he said that phase 3 vaccine trials are nearing completion but they can't be completed until third party assessment completes. That part hasn't even begun. Phase 4 trials won't be approved to begin by the FDA until it's confirmed that all safety aspects are considered. He calls the vaccine experimental considering that other inexpensive and non-invasive treatments are known to be safe to use. Dr. Malone himself sent his report to the FDA essentially recommending the vaccine be considered unsafe for injection into humans but FDA has ignored his report (he says). Weird world we live in! The CDC being truly independent of sway from big pharma is touting for our trust for long term safety while only focused on the acute short term minor side effects. If Dr. Malone is correct, the trust in the CDC is void and all policies extending out would be void also.

• 
  @sherisomerville12183 жыл бұрын

  Hi, Actually mRNA was first described in 1961 by Sydney Brenner , François Jacob and Matthew Meselson as a carrier of information for the biosynthesis of a protein. I know it's frightening to hear the stories on Dark Horse, but Dr. Malone actually wrote a paper in the 80's on the transfer of the mRNA protein he did not "invent" mRNA. It's been around for a long time and used in other applications. It triggers immune responses so is not a sinister medical technology. I hope that helpful.

• 
  @whaleoilbeefhooked38923 жыл бұрын

  @@sherisomerville1218 Thank you for your steering endorsement. I realize that the following is an interpreted quote used in secondary reporting, but it forms a balance to bioscience understanding for the layperson of these Leaky Classification vaccines where the (UTube channel) "Corona Ausschuss - Ausweichkanal" in most part agrees: "Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine," ...... "In the shocking interview, the world’s top virologist stated blankly: ‘There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have been vaccinated already. We must be prepared to incinerate the bodies.’ The scientific genius backed claims of other pre-eminent virologists after studying the constituents of the vaccine. ‘They will all die from antibody dependent enhancement. Nothing more can be said.’" Aside from self-interpretive accuracy in either Dr. Luc Montagnier or Dr. Robert Malone's conclusions, there are many other highly qualified doctors who differ in the opinions of the 'selective' science message proclaiming complete vaccine safety. These doctors (now many) describe the risk/reward to vaccinate children as insanity Health professionals with alternative opinions are shouting from the roof tops only to be censored from being heard. Some lose their positions while others are publicly chastised by their peers. There has never been a 'Masters of Bioscience' public debate shown on the TV. Why not? The PCR testing was allowed to be funded by the vaccine manufactures to provide epidemiological data for analysis reporting to be given to the world governments for public safety measures with no opportunity allowed for public audit tracking for that data. Do you think this presents an obvious ethics issue?