Пікірлер

• 
  @TTT6111110 сағат бұрын

  To the guy who commented on the mainspring. I used a mainspring winder because it’s an automatic movement although I don’t have the automatic components. Automatic mainsprings are harder to wind by hand and easily damaged. I think I accidentally deleted your comment. Sorry 😔

• 
  @hkkyau3 күн бұрын

  A 231 movement, is definitely, not, a 321

• 
  @TTT611112 күн бұрын

  Yep 321 is a chrono just a typo

• 
  @KZCAN3 күн бұрын

  Nice. Thank you

• 
  @TTT611113 күн бұрын

  Welcome 😊

• 
  @ReiMonCoH16 күн бұрын

  I think most of us have gotten away from the non synthetic lubes. Times move on

• 
  @TTT6111116 күн бұрын

  Old school buddy 😂

• 
  @ThisIsArtemK17 күн бұрын

  Hello! The inscription says 'On Your Birthday. 10 April 1988'

• 
  @TTT6111117 күн бұрын

  Thank you so much I’ve been wondering for a while much appreciated 👍

• 
  @ThisIsArtemK17 күн бұрын

  @@TTT61111 you're very welcome!

• 
  @pghgb557218 күн бұрын

  Why do you think they would use twin mainsprings with an automatic winding movement - was it about having a significant power reserve, or more about needing additional torque to drive a power hungry movement?

• 
  @TTT6111118 күн бұрын

  Yes two mainsprings provide more torque with improves amplitude

• 
  @richardrichmond800618 күн бұрын

  What a unique movement, thank you for sharing.

• 
  @TTT6111118 күн бұрын

  Glad you liked it 👍

• 
  @amphibiousone797219 күн бұрын

  Nice movement 🫡

• 
  @TTT6111118 күн бұрын

  Thanks very unusual 👍

• 
  @amphibiousone797219 күн бұрын

  One of the nicer Jump Hour watches out there.

• 
  @fooK-xo1ky28 күн бұрын

  😅真正師傅。

• 
  @pghgb5572Ай бұрын

  Was it persisting down when you filmed this?😂

• 
  @TTT61111Ай бұрын

  Yeah had the window open

• 
  @tedblack2415Ай бұрын

  Do like these 70's digital mechanicals & can't ask for more results wise ,good job.

• 
  @amphibiousone7972Ай бұрын

  That is most definitely a very cool watch . Bet you inspired people to search eBay. Reminds me of Timex watches in construction methods.... well... except for the jewels. Interesting video thank you. Good Fortunes, Great Successes and Many Blessings 🫡🤝

• 
  @TTT61111Ай бұрын

  Much obliged thank you very much.

• 
  @pghgb5572Ай бұрын

  What would the typical service interval be for a minimal jewel movement like this, compared to a ‘typical’ 15/17 jewel movement?

• 
  @TTT61111Ай бұрын

  Around two years buddy

• 
  @frager555Ай бұрын

  Теперь осталось собрать все это Лего😂

• 
  @pghgb5572Ай бұрын

  Watchman? - it was Time Tosser last week and Working Class Watches a few months ago! I can’t keep up 😂

• 
  @TTT61111Ай бұрын

  Sorry for the confusion brother 😂

• 
  @pghgb5572Ай бұрын

  @@TTT61111 just as long as you know who you are!

• 
  @linuslane2704Ай бұрын

  Nice

• 
  @zues1215102 ай бұрын

  Very finely engineered pieces, something so advanced but it still fits like lego. Kudos!

• 
  @TTT611112 ай бұрын

  Amazing design

• 
  @TTT611112 ай бұрын

  Thanks brother

• 
  @pghgb55722 ай бұрын

  Hell of a name change!

• 
  @nickjohnson217 Жыл бұрын

  Old Omega movements are imo the best quality made money can buy, they jump hoops over a Rolex in quality