This feels like something I’d find on special features in a Justice League CD
@EarlJohn614 сағат бұрын
And what ever you do, don't let Ra's A Ghul see this file 😮
@ryanallen6277 сағат бұрын
Great video love watching this type of content just binge watched the rogue gallery video series I hope we get more videos talking about the rogues gallery or maybe have batman talk about his training with his mentors before he become batman or talks about the bat computer or talk about his family history or Wayne enterprises or his charities as a philanthropist or the bat vehicles
@TightPantsJack17 сағат бұрын
4:02 Wouldn't “Phantom Zone" be an option for everyone on this list?
@Rabbit23GSOКүн бұрын
This makes the whole doesn't kill thing make a whole lot more since, because he risk his salvation if he does cross that road.
@RedDragonM12 күн бұрын
Thank you, Kevin Conroy. RIP legend.
@SpectraPhantom-114392 күн бұрын
Lol batman didn't think of this when superman became the head of the regime
@BlackieFoxxless2 күн бұрын
Is Bane compared to being like the devil himself, or is it the joker?
@BlackieFoxxless2 күн бұрын
Or is Catwoman as devilish like the female demon named Lillith? Does she take lives of innocent people?
@nils9202 күн бұрын
Let's also not forget one more crucial detail: There's a very good reason why Batman won't kill criminals like The Joker: IT'S WHAT THE JOKER WANTS! The Joker wants nothing more than to break Batman mentally. The Joker wants Batman to lose control. And The Joker wants to see Batman's sanity crumble. If the Injustice franchise has taught us anything, it is The Joker ALWAYS gets the last laugh. Even beyond the grave.
@manekmohan29743 күн бұрын
What about the Injustice league 😏
@Coolwolfgamer_yt3 күн бұрын
I’m always here for you Batman ❤️
@ice_springtrap82254 күн бұрын
Poor Guy Gardner. Wonder what he did to deserve being tested on by Batman
@SamuelGracefell3 күн бұрын
I hope that's a joke. Because his comic version did a lot.
@ice_springtrap82253 күн бұрын
@@SamuelGracefell Ik nothing about Guy Gardner so please inform me
@SamuelGracefell3 күн бұрын
@ice_springtrap8225 He isn't hated a lot (many people actually like him) but he was poorly written in a lot of series. Batman face punched him after guy challenged batman for the leadership role. Aside from that, he isn't very bright, is a jerk, occasional *ssh*le, committed sexual misconduct while drunk and he joined the red lantern corps. Though many fans don't consider this cannon, it is written.
@ice_springtrap82253 күн бұрын
@@SamuelGracefell what was he like in brave and the bold?
@SamuelGracefell2 күн бұрын
@ice_springtrap8225 I might not remember clearly since I saw it a long time ago, but guy was pretty decent in that. He did cause problems (fights) here and there, but aside from that and his arrogance, he was a good guy.
@tommycooper45414 күн бұрын
Missed your videos, hope you make more.
@DarkKnightArchive4 күн бұрын
A lot more
@illermenace4 күн бұрын
BATMAN, religion itself is idolatry: love principles *NOT* people. With that said, If Jesus was the son of god, should the alien Races of Oa, Thanagar and Korugar worship him?🤔
@DarkKnightArchive2 күн бұрын
Let's first address the notion of idolatry. True religion, at its core, is not about idolizing people but about embracing principles and values that transcend individual human beings. Christianity, when understood correctly, emphasizes the love of God and the adherence to principles such as love, justice, and mercy, which are personified in the figure of Jesus Christ. Jesus represents the ultimate embodiment of these divine principles. Regarding the question of whether alien races like those from Oa, Thanagar, and Korugar should worship Jesus if He is the Son of God, it's essential to recognize that the message of Jesus transcends human boundaries and cultures. If we accept the premise that Jesus is the Son of God, His teachings and sacrifice have universal implications. The principles He espoused-love, compassion, self-sacrifice-are not limited to Earth or to humans but apply to all sentient beings capable of understanding and embracing these values. However, worship in Christianity is not about forced allegiance but about a personal relationship with God through Jesus. The decision to worship or follow these principles would be a matter of personal conviction for any being, regardless of their origin. The essence of Christianity is the transformative power of love and redemption, which has the potential to reach and resonate with any soul, human or otherwise. Whether on Earth or in the far reaches of the universe, the principles of love, justice, and selflessness can guide any being toward a higher purpose and a deeper understanding of their existence. Ultimately, the core message is to love and uphold principles that elevate us beyond our limitations, much like the philosophy that guides me in my fight for justice in Gotham. Whether we’re talking about humans or aliens, the principles that Jesus taught can serve as a beacon for all.
@NightmareRex64 күн бұрын
i love jesus altho i dont like the archane 99/100 to hell system vs the non archane 1/3 to hell system (free will, ALL knowlage VS free-will and MASS deception)
@DarkKnightArchive4 күн бұрын
I understand your concerns about the concept of hell and the different interpretations of salvation. It's a complex topic, and one that has been debated by theologians and scholars for centuries. However, let's consider a few points that might help clarify this issue. First, the essence of Jesus' teachings is love, compassion, and redemption. The central message of Christianity is that through Jesus, we have a path to salvation. It's not about arbitrary rules or a punitive system, but about a relationship with God, based on faith and love. The idea of free will is crucial here. God has given us the freedom to choose our path. This freedom means that we are responsible for our actions and their consequences. The notion of hell can be seen as the natural outcome of a life lived in deliberate separation from God, rather than a punishment imposed without reason. Moreover, the knowledge and understanding of divine justice are beyond our human comprehension. What may seem harsh or unfair to us might be viewed differently from a divine perspective, where ultimate justice and mercy are perfectly balanced. Regarding the concept of deception, it's important to differentiate between genuine faith and the misuse of religion by individuals who might twist its teachings for their own ends. True faith is not about being deceived, but about seeking truth and living according to principles of love, justice, and humility. Remember, Jesus' message was about offering hope, forgiveness, and a way to reconnect with God. It's about understanding that, despite our flaws and failures, we are loved and given the chance to turn our lives around. In defending the existence of God and Christianity, it's vital to focus on the core of Jesus' message - love, forgiveness, and redemption - rather than getting lost in the complexities of doctrinal differences. Faith is a journey, and each person's path to understanding and accepting God's love is unique.
@davidhatcher70165 күн бұрын
This isn't canon to DC comics. Also God in DC is the Presence and it's existence as well as magic, demons, angels and all manner of creatures are explicitly self evident and commonplace unlike in our world.
@user-bz3yt8pi3n6 күн бұрын
Aww Batman's proud of his son 🥰
@waynebrown65256 күн бұрын
This was one of the best videos I've seen and I'm so glad I watched it praise God
@JohnSmith-mf3dh7 күн бұрын
Alfred has left very clear that he is a Christian and since he raised Bruce Wayne, I wouldn't doubt he raise Bruce as a Christian too.
@g.i.azilla35578 күн бұрын
I like this dynamic
@dorianphilotheates37698 күн бұрын
This is “evidence”?! From the perspective of a Biblical archaeologist, I can’t even begin to enumerate the gross inaccuracies, blatant fallacies, and outright lies in this one...
@DarkKnightArchive8 күн бұрын
I appreciate your passion for archaeology and your dedication to seeking the truth. As someone who values evidence and logical reasoning, I understand where you're coming from. However, let me address your concerns from a different perspective. Archaeological Evidence There are several instances where archaeology has supported biblical accounts. For example: The City of David: Excavations in Jerusalem have revealed structures that align with descriptions of the City of David in the Bible. The Pool of Siloam: Discovered in 2004, this pool matches the description in John 9:7 where Jesus heals a blind man. The Dead Sea Scrolls: These ancient manuscripts, discovered in the 1940s and 1950s, include texts from the Hebrew Bible that date back to the Second Temple period, confirming the antiquity and preservation of biblical texts. Historical Consistency The Bible, particularly the New Testament, contains numerous references to historical figures and events that are corroborated by external sources: Pontius Pilate: An inscription discovered in Caesarea Maritima confirms his existence and role as the prefect of Judea during the time of Jesus. Herod the Great: His extensive building projects and political influence are well-documented by historians like Josephus. Census of Quirinius: Luke 2:1-3 mentions a census during Quirinius's governorship of Syria, which aligns with historical records of a census around that time. Addressing Inaccuracies While there may be discrepancies and debates about specific details, it’s essential to consider the broader picture. The Bible was written over centuries by different authors with varying perspectives. Despite this, its core messages and many historical references have been remarkably consistent. Eyewitness Accounts The New Testament, particularly the Gospels, is based on eyewitness accounts. While written decades after Jesus' death, these texts reflect the testimonies of those who lived with and followed Jesus. Early church fathers, such as Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, also attest to the authenticity of these accounts. Philosophical and Moral Consistency Beyond archaeology, the Bible's philosophical and moral teachings have had a profound impact on Western civilization. Concepts of justice, mercy, and human dignity found in the Bible have shaped legal systems, social norms, and ethical standards. Faith and Reason Faith isn't just about believing without evidence; it’s about interpreting the evidence in a way that makes sense of the world and our experiences. While archaeology and history provide valuable insights, they are part of a larger tapestry that includes personal experiences, philosophical reflections, and spiritual insights. Conclusion As Batman, I rely on evidence, logic, and reason. While there may be debates and differences in interpretation, it’s crucial to approach the Bible with the same rigor and openness we apply to any historical text. By doing so, we can appreciate its profound impact on humanity and its enduring relevance.
@stevensjean409110 күн бұрын
Amen. U got my subscription
@italianduded116111 күн бұрын
And fighting sports 🗿
@jd647312 күн бұрын
Why does he dress like a demon?
@maureencora112 күн бұрын
There a Time & Place For Everything, Batman. Why? Because We're the Good Guys. (smile) In Time.
@KristenPaluch14 күн бұрын
i'm glad you believed in god batman i accepted jesus as my savior and was baptized a year ago
@booktheory309814 күн бұрын
Amen! Jesus Is Lord!
@RedisForFire15 күн бұрын
That was fantastic. It's clear a great deal of work went in to not only the edit itself, but presenting the information in a clear, concise and gripping manner. Bravo. I used to be agnostic, and was even an atheist for a short while. I had major issues with the church, and couldn't stand Christians. I didn't even like hearing (I am ashamed to say) Jesus's name spoken because of all the baggage that came with it. Many years later I have seen things most wouldn't believe. I have seen and heard and experienced enough to know for a fact that Jesus exists, he is the son of God and that God is real. That doesn't make things any easier, going from faith to knowing. It actually makes it much harder, because even if people are open minded and will speak with you about your experiences, no one has any answers. Still, I can't imagine existing without a relationship with God or Christ. It informs almost everything I do, and I am in constant contact with my savior. For any on the fence: seek God with a true and earnest heart and he WILL reveal himself to you. All you need to do is take that first step. Ask Jesus to come into your heart and soul and reside there with you. God is unknowable to men, so you must seek Christ, for if you reject the son, how can you possibly have a relationship with the father? That's it. And in time that seed of earnestness and willingness will become a mountain of faith. Besides, if God is the greatest good, the highest reality, and the greatest intellect, why would you not want to align yourself with the will of the greatest good, greatest intellect and highest reality? God bless.
@DeconvertedMan15 күн бұрын
Batman is as real as Jesus. :D
@MAC_Productions14 күн бұрын
Empirically prove that pls
@DeconvertedMan14 күн бұрын
@@MAC_Productions Clearly its true since Batman was talking about god.
@MAC_Productions14 күн бұрын
@@DeconvertedMan bruh
@DarkKnightArchive14 күн бұрын
Comparing the reality of Batman to that of Jesus is an intriguing thought, but it's important to distinguish between fictional characters and historical figures. I, Batman, am a creation of the comic book world. My existence is rooted in stories, crafted by writers and artists to entertain, inspire, and explore complex themes. I'm a symbol, an idea, created to fight against the darkness within Gotham City. But at the end of the day, I'm fictional. Jesus, on the other hand, is a historical figure. There's substantial historical evidence that Jesus of Nazareth lived around 2,000 years ago. Multiple sources, both religious and secular, document his life and impact. The Gospels, written within decades of his life, provide detailed accounts of his teachings, crucifixion, and the claims of his resurrection. These documents have been scrutinized and studied by historians and scholars for centuries. The comparison also touches on a deeper level of belief and faith. Believing in Jesus isn't just about acknowledging his historical existence; it's about recognizing his teachings and the profound impact he has had on billions of lives throughout history. Christianity has shaped cultures, ethics, and civilizations in ways that are undeniable, whether one is a believer or not. While Batman is a figure of fiction designed to inspire hope and justice, Jesus is a figure whose life and message have inspired faith, transformation, and a moral framework for countless people over millennia. In Gotham, I fight against physical crime and corruption, striving to bring justice and hope to a city in need. But the message of Jesus addresses the human condition on a deeper, spiritual level. His teachings on love, forgiveness, and redemption provide a pathway to inner transformation and eternal hope. In essence, while Batman and Jesus may share the ability to inspire, their realities are fundamentally different. One is the creation of human imagination, and the other is a cornerstone of human history and faith. Thank you for the thought-provoking comparison. Remember, in our search for truth, it's crucial to discern the lines between fiction and reality, symbol and substance.
@DeconvertedMan14 күн бұрын
@@MAC_Productions checkmate.
@awall129815 күн бұрын
Christ is King
@Veins115 күн бұрын
I'm disappointed that Batman can't deduce that the Bible is mostly fiction. But I take comfort in 3 things. That this is not Batman but someone who projects his beliefs through Batman. That even if this was Batman.. well he met 'actual' gods, so that's fine in his reality. I personally prefer Batman when he was in more grounded stories, but I'm fine with a fictional character believing in another fictional character, as long as this has some meaning in a story. And that I'm okay with smart characters like Batman being wrong from time to time, or having flaws. Now, this is a nice presentation, and I generally like your videos. Great work with the voice and content. But if God exists or not, is a debate that can never be resolved in a crystal clear manner. It all boils down to faith. I think that this 'Batman' thinks more like Daredevil than the Batman that I believe in. Here's my comments about this video: 0:55 You talk about consistency only in NT. Still that doesn't prove anything. Even Harry Potter is consistent and that's fiction. 1:30 Real locations are not proof. Spiderman 'lives' in NY but that's fiction. 2:30 How come these historians never talked about miracles and resurrections? 3:20 It is like you cherry-pick which scientists you prefer to believe. That's confirmation bias. 4:25 This starts well, but the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments are nothing but weak opinions. Just by displaying "accidental chance" shows that you have looked this from the perspective that suits you. 4:40 Personal experiences do not count. It may as well be a delusion. 5:37 Even if all that's bullshit, I'm glad that the message is positive. But the Bible and Faith can easily be distorted into justifying killing and torturing. So, please don't kill someone who works on Saturday! 7:35 Nice chapter. I like it when people try to look other perspectives. The spiritual world is something Batman could believe in, since in his universe he has seen zombies and resurrections (Ra's al Ghul for example). 9:12 What is that greatest purpose?
@reubenax15 күн бұрын
Harry Potter has 1 author. The new testament has several writers corroborating the same event The locations being mentioned is not proof, but it does show that the writers were familiar with the area, adding credibility to the notion that they were eyewitnesses Personal experiences do count in this context. It's this version of Batman explaining why *he* believes in God
@DarkKnightArchive15 күн бұрын
I appreciate your thoughts and your passion for grounded, well-reasoned discussions. While our perspectives may differ, it’s important to explore these topics with respect and depth. Faith and Evidence: You're right that the existence of God ultimately involves faith, but faith is not opposed to reason. Historical and philosophical arguments can provide a rational basis for belief in God. The New Testament, for instance, offers historical consistency and early eyewitness accounts, which many historians find compelling when investigating the resurrection of Jesus. Historical References and Fiction: Consistency and real locations in the Bible don’t conclusively prove its divine inspiration, but they do lend credibility to its historical claims. Unlike fictional works, the Bible’s historical details have been corroborated by archaeological findings and extra-biblical sources. This doesn’t automatically validate every miracle, but it suggests the Bible is more than mere fiction. Historians and Miracles: Ancient historians like Josephus and Tacitus mention Jesus and his crucifixion. While they may not detail miracles, their references to Jesus lend weight to his historical existence. The Gospels, written by those close to Jesus, focus on his miracles and resurrection, which were central to their message. Philosophical Arguments: The Cosmological, Teleological, and Moral arguments are not mere opinions but long-standing philosophical discussions. While some may find them unconvincing, they provide a framework for understanding the existence of a creator. The fine-tuning of the universe, for example, suggests an intelligent designer rather than random chance. Personal Experiences: While personal experiences are subjective, they can be powerful indicators of reality. Many people, including myself, have had encounters that point towards a divine presence. These experiences, coupled with historical and philosophical evidence, form a cumulative case for belief in God. Faith and Morality: The misuse of faith to justify violence is a serious issue, but true Christianity, based on Jesus' teachings, promotes love, forgiveness, and peace. The New Testament condemns violence and emphasizes loving one’s neighbor and even one’s enemies. Spiritual Realities: In my universe, I’ve encountered extraordinary phenomena that challenge a purely materialistic view of reality. While fictional, these experiences mirror the spiritual truths that many believers attest to in the real world. Greatest Purpose: The greatest purpose, from a Christian perspective, is to know and love God, and to love others. This purpose provides a foundation for meaning, moral values, and hope that transcends our immediate circumstances. In conclusion, while faith in God involves personal belief, it is supported by a rich tapestry of historical evidence, philosophical reasoning, and personal experience. As Batman, I seek truth and justice, and these lead me to believe in something greater than myself. (I also have more answers to your questions in the comments that I have responded to. Also feel free to ask more)
@Veins115 күн бұрын
@@DarkKnightArchive Having respectful debates is nice. You have a nice project here and I do follow you. I like your content. Regardless if there is a God or not, all we need is to be good to each other in this life. I appreciate it when religions are used for good. But there is also a dark side that we need to be aware of. Empty promises, false hope, holy texts used to rationalize bad behaviours and liars who take advantage of people in a weak state. My religious Batman would fight against all that.
@DarkKnightArchive15 күн бұрын
@@Veins1 I appreciate your support for my content. The importance of being good to each other in this life is undeniable, and many religious teachings, including Christianity, emphasize this principle. The Essence of True Faith: True Christianity calls for love, compassion, and justice. Jesus' teachings focus on loving one's neighbor, caring for the marginalized, and promoting peace. When religion is practiced in its genuine form, it becomes a force for immense good in the world. Addressing the Dark Side: You're right; there are those who misuse religion for personal gain or to justify harmful actions. As Batman, I would stand against such abuses. The Bible warns against false prophets and those who exploit faith for selfish purposes. It's crucial to discern genuine faith from manipulation. Hope and Promises: While some may see religious promises as empty, many find profound hope and purpose in their faith. This hope can inspire positive change, resilience in adversity, and a sense of community. It’s important to distinguish between false hope peddled by charlatans and the genuine hope that sustains millions. Rationalizing Bad Behavior: Misusing holy texts to justify bad behavior is a perversion of faith. True Christianity does not condone violence, discrimination, or exploitation. The teachings of Jesus are clear in their call for humility, service, and sacrificial love. As Batman, I would confront and challenge any misuse of religion that harms others. Living Out Faith: The challenge for believers is to live out their faith authentically, demonstrating the love and justice that their faith demands. When practiced sincerely, Christianity motivates people to work towards social justice, support the needy, and build a more compassionate society. Fighting Injustice: A religious Batman would indeed fight against those who use faith to manipulate and harm. He would defend the vulnerable, expose corruption, and promote truth and integrity. The fight against injustice is a core part of both Batman’s mission and Christian teaching. In conclusion, while there are challenges and abuses within religious practice, the core teachings of Christianity align with the values of justice, love, and compassion. It’s essential to uphold these values and challenge any misuses of faith. As Batman, I stand for truth and justice, values that resonate deeply with the true essence of Christianity.
@Veins115 күн бұрын
@@DarkKnightArchive I agree with all that. I do think however that Batman most of all believes in himself. He built his entire persona and life on his own. When in despair, I have never seen him pray or turn to God. He never expects a miracle to save him. He prevails on his own. Most weak people get on their knees and pray. Batman takes action to clean up Gotham. Also, Batman is control freak and has trust issues. He needs to be in control of everything... from Robins, to Gotham, to Superman! Perhaps if he knew for sure that there was a God (or any supernatural being) he would try to device a contingency plan to subdue them! I like how you use words to express yourself and this was a nice discussion! Thanks Batman!
@StephanASmith16 күн бұрын
Praise be to the only true God, the Lord Jesus Christ 🙏🏾 ✝️
@Stardweller116 күн бұрын
I’ve always imagined Batman’s religious beliefs as being something like a mix of Roman Catholic Christianity and Episcopalian Christianity with a flavoring of Buddhism and a tacit acknowledgment of the Greek Pantheon (but only after meeting Wonder Woman).
@integralgamings25377 күн бұрын
Interesting, oddly specific. Could be, lol.
@89playstation6516 күн бұрын
Couldn't have put it better.
@Fonch11716 күн бұрын
Dude... THIS VIDEO IS WHY I USE KZread. To be able to find GEMS LIKE THIS. Thank you :) I believe in God too.
@raydnchilson774716 күн бұрын
Aww man I thought it was gonna be the dark knight batman voice. R.I.P.
@cbandit771517 күн бұрын
This is a great idea because many nonchristians might click on this video as a meme.
@NightmareRex64 күн бұрын
yea lol. altho the modern owners of the IP of batman milking it dry (66sne6) (disney) dont like God, i mean look at there 6-666 syolbol in name.
@dorememe85483 күн бұрын
I saw how long it was before I clicked it, and thought it was going to take itself seriously and provide arguments. After watching it, I feel like it really is a meme. And I’m still an atheist.
@carterko19_5917 күн бұрын
Can this Batman be cannon to the DCEU. I would so watch this movie.
@Hogan23117 күн бұрын
Rest In Peace Kevin Conroy.
@maureencora117 күн бұрын
Why? Because We're the Good Guys. Keeping the Faith in You, My Lord. Thank You, God. From the Bottom of My Bat Heart, Amen.
@kingdavidsaures847917 күн бұрын
Amen, god bless you.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
Science and Christianity are totally at odds. One of the foundational axioms of the scientific method is reproducibility. This is the concept that says that if an experiment is repeated in exactly the same conditions in exactly the same way, then the result will be the same, or within the same statistical distribution. If it were true that experiments could just go any way at all regardless of how you control for variables there would be no way to describe laws of nature, and no science. Christianity deposits the existence of an omnipotent God who interacts with reality by changing the laws of physics at whim. If it is true that such a being exists it is impossible to ever know what the outcome of any experiment will be, since every outcome is simply the whim of a Divine being and not the result of specific laws being followed. Both axioms cannot simultaneously be true, they are mutually exclusive. And this is true for all religions that believe in an omnipotent interactive God
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
It's funny that Christians try to take credit for what they did to help during a genocide while simultaneously celebrating as God ordained several other genocides. What the Nazis did was bad, but what the Israelites did under the command of your God, specifically killing every man and boy, Every Woman who was pregnant or had any children, crush the skulls of every single infant, and take the young girls that are left for yourselves to rape at your leisure. Please explain to me how this genocide was fine but the Nazi Genocide was not. I can explain perfectly clearly from a secular position why both of these genocides, all genocides actually, are horrendous and wrong . So I suppose that's something secular morality has that Christian morality doesn't, as you're forced to celebrate at least some genocides.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
You like that story of Corrie Ten Boom huh? Saving all those Jewish people. Those Jewish people who you believe will be tortured in fire for eternity for failing to believe was she and you believe? Not okay for the Nazis to kill them, but fine for your God to torture them for eternity. Perfect sense.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
Christians in the United States are largely conservatives. These are the same people that proudly brag about their Gun Arsenal that they're going to use to kill anyone that comes on their property, votes to have the death penalty instituted, vote to keep immigrants out of our country, vote to prevent programs that would feed or provide medicine for the poor or needy. It is clear that claiming to be Christian is not an indicator that a person will show any even marginal measure of forgiveness, tolerance, or compassion. Atheists are almost exclusively liberal voters, the party that supports feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, taking care of children who don't have parents, providing medical care for people who need it, to find non warlike solutions to International problems etcetera
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
The percentage of atheists in prison is almost zero. The percentage of the prison population which is Christian or Muslim is incredibly High. Countries which have high rates of religiosity, have the lowest standards of living, the highest crime rates, the highest poverty, the lowest education rates, the highest rates of violence etcetera, while Nations which are largely atheists rank among the best in the world on nearly every metric. It is pretty clear that having religion cannot be a strong indicator that a person will be good or moral, nor that being an atheist will mean they are immoral, quite the opposite in fact
@DarkKnightArchive16 күн бұрын
Correlation vs. Causation: It's important to distinguish between correlation and causation. The fact that certain countries with high rates of religiosity have lower standards of living and higher crime rates does not necessarily mean that religion is the cause of these issues. Socioeconomic factors, historical contexts, and governance quality play significant roles. Countries with high poverty and crime rates often face complex challenges that cannot be attributed solely to religious belief. Prison Demographics: The demographics of prison populations reflect a variety of factors, including socioeconomic status, education levels, and systemic issues within the justice system. The high percentage of Christians and Muslims in prison might be more reflective of the general population’s demographics rather than the inherent morality of religious individuals. Additionally, many prisoners might identify with a religion for cultural reasons or as a source of hope and rehabilitation during incarceration, rather than as a genuine reflection of their pre-incarceration beliefs. Moral Behavior and Belief: Morality is not exclusive to religious belief, nor is it absent in atheists. People of all belief systems can exhibit moral or immoral behavior. Christianity teaches that humans are inherently flawed and in need of grace and redemption. This means that simply identifying as a Christian does not make one immune to immoral actions. True Christian teaching emphasizes transformation and living according to the values taught by Jesus, such as love, compassion, and justice. Positive Influence of Religion: Despite the criticisms, religion has been a force for good in many areas. Religious organizations often lead charitable efforts, provide social support, and promote ethical behavior. In many societies, religious institutions play a crucial role in fostering community, aiding the poor, and promoting moral values. Societal Benefits of Religion: There are numerous studies showing that individuals who engage in regular religious practices tend to have better mental health, lower rates of substance abuse, and greater social support networks. The sense of community, purpose, and ethical framework provided by religious belief can be beneficial to individuals and society. Atheist Nations and Metrics: While some predominantly atheist nations rank high on various societal metrics, these countries also benefit from strong governance, robust social systems, and high levels of education. These factors contribute significantly to their success and cannot be attributed solely to the absence of religion. Objective Morality and God: The existence of objective moral values provides a strong argument for the existence of God. If moral values are merely subjective and evolved, then they lack a solid foundation. Christianity posits that objective moral values are rooted in the nature of God, giving them an unchanging and universal standard. In conclusion, while the statistics about religiosity and societal well-being might raise questions, they do not provide a comprehensive picture. The relationship between belief, morality, and societal health is complex and influenced by many factors. Christianity offers a robust framework for understanding morality and provides a source of hope, purpose, and community for countless individuals. The existence of God and the teachings of Christianity remain a powerful and compelling foundation for moral values and ethical behavior.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
Your personal feelings of warmth, or love, or strength, or expansiveness, or whatever you happen to be feeling that you're attributing to God, may be evidence to you, but by its nature it can't be evidence to anyone else. And if you have ever used psychedelic drugs, you will be aware that many of these same feelings, if not all of them, can definitely be achieved without any Divine assistance. Your brain is able to create those brain States that make you have those feelings
@DarkKnightArchive16 күн бұрын
Gospel Accounts and Historical Reliability: The Gospels, while indeed biblical texts, are also valuable historical documents. They provide multiple attestations to Jesus' burial in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea. This is significant because it is independently reported in all four Gospels (Matthew 27:57-60, Mark 15:42-46, Luke 23:50-53, John 19:38-42). The criterion of multiple attestation increases the reliability of this claim. Early Creeds and Paul's Letters: Early Christian creeds, such as the one found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7, which dates to within a few years of Jesus' crucifixion, also mention Jesus' burial. Paul's letters are considered by many historians, including skeptical ones, to be genuine and early sources of information about Jesus. Roman Practices and Exceptions: While it is true that Romans commonly left crucifixion victims to rot or disposed of them in mass graves, there were exceptions. Roman authorities sometimes allowed for the burial of crucified individuals, especially in the case of those with influential friends or family. Joseph of Arimathea, described as a member of the Sanhedrin and a wealthy man, could have had the necessary influence to request and receive Jesus' body for burial. Archaeological Evidence: Archaeological discoveries have shown that tombs consistent with the description in the Gospels existed during this period. The discovery of the "James Ossuary" and the tomb of Caiaphas, the high priest who played a role in Jesus' trial, demonstrate that rock-cut tombs were used in Jerusalem at the time. Jewish Burial Customs: Jewish customs also play a role in understanding the burial of Jesus. Jewish law emphasized the importance of burying the dead, and leaving a body on a cross overnight was considered a violation of Jewish law (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). This cultural context supports the Gospel accounts of Jesus being taken down and buried before the Sabbath. Historical Consensus: Many historians, regardless of their religious beliefs, accept that Jesus was buried in a tomb. For instance, John Dominic Crossan, a highly skeptical scholar, acknowledges that Jesus' burial by Joseph of Arimathea is historically probable. Similarly, Bart Ehrman, another skeptical scholar, recognizes the burial as one of the more certain facts about Jesus' life.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
Suggesting that a higher power is helping you in times when you are in need is totally uncompassionate to the countless individuals throughout history who have suffered and died horribly without anyone intervening, Divine or otherwise. What makes you so special that God reaches his hand down and helps you find your car keys, but let's that toddler remain locked in a Psychopaths basement being tortured? If your God does in fact sometimes choose to help people his choices are absolutely appalling.
@DarkKnightArchive16 күн бұрын
Free Will and Human Responsibility: One of the central tenets of Christian theology is the concept of free will. God has given humans the freedom to choose their actions. This freedom allows for genuine love and moral growth, but it also opens the door to the possibility of evil actions. The atrocities committed by individuals are a tragic misuse of this gift of free will. Blaming God for human evil overlooks the responsibility we have for our choices and actions (Deuteronomy 30:19). The Nature of Divine Intervention: The idea that God selectively intervenes in our lives does not imply that He acts whimsically or with favoritism. The Christian understanding of God’s intervention is often subtle and not always in the form of miraculous rescues. God’s help can come in many forms, such as inner strength, courage, and wisdom to face difficult situations. The apparent randomness of divine intervention can be difficult to comprehend, but it's not necessarily a reflection of God’s character but rather of our limited understanding (Isaiah 55:8-9). The Mystery of Suffering: Christianity does not shy away from the reality of suffering. The Bible is filled with accounts of individuals who suffered greatly, yet maintained their faith. Job, for instance, experienced profound suffering and loss, yet he held onto his faith in God’s ultimate goodness. The presence of suffering in the world is a complex issue that intersects with human free will, the consequences of living in a fallen world, and the mysterious ways in which God’s purposes are worked out through human history (Romans 8:28). Jesus and the Cross: The central event of Christianity is the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, which shows that God is not distant from human suffering. Jesus’ suffering on the cross is seen as God’s ultimate act of empathy and solidarity with humanity. Through Jesus’ death and resurrection, Christians believe that God has provided a way to redeem suffering and offer hope beyond this life (Hebrews 4:15-16). The Role of the Church and Believers: Christians are called to be God’s hands and feet in the world, to bring relief and compassion to those who are suffering. While we may not understand why certain tragedies occur, we are called to respond with love and action. The church has a long history of providing care for the suffering, feeding the hungry, and advocating for justice. These acts of compassion are ways in which God works through believers to address suffering in the world (Matthew 25:35-40). The Hope of Redemption: Christianity offers a vision of ultimate justice and redemption. The belief in a final resurrection and a new creation where there will be no more suffering or death provides hope that the injustices and pains of this world are not the final word. This eschatological hope is a central aspect of Christian faith and provides a framework for understanding present suffering in the light of future restoration (Revelation 21:4). In conclusion, while the presence of suffering and evil in the world is a profound challenge, the Christian faith provides a robust framework for addressing these issues. It acknowledges human free will, the mystery of divine action, and the hope of ultimate redemption. My faith in God helps me to navigate the darkness, find strength in adversity, and work towards a world where justice and compassion prevail.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
The seeming fine tuning of the universe implies that the various constants which describe the nature of our universe could have been anything other than what they are. There is simply no evidence that any of these values could be different. It is sort of like saying that if the value of pi were off by even one billionth, you wouldn't get true circles. Which is true, but silly, because Pi is defined by circles. Pi exists precisely because the geometry of the universe, and the geometry of circles, dictate what it will be, and it therefore cannot be anything other than what it is. It's very likely that the constants of our universe are like this, what they are because of the geometry of the universe and unchangeable . And if you don't like that one, and you just can't accept that the constants might not be variable, there's another theory in quantum physics called the many worlds Theory which is extremely popular among the leading physicists on the planet, which suggests that the Universe splits itself over and over again every time a Quantum decision is made, and therefore an infinite, or nearly infinite number of branching universes exist. There would therefore be countless other universes which did not have the correct constants and simply failed, and countless other universes like ours in which the constants were correct for life to develop. And obviously we should not be surprised that we find ourselves in one of these universes, as if we tried to exist in one of the other universes we wouldn't exist
@DarkKnightArchive14 күн бұрын
The argument about the fine-tuning of the universe often leads to profound questions about our existence and the nature of reality. Let's break it down. First, you mentioned that there's no evidence the constants of the universe could be different, comparing it to the value of Pi. Pi is indeed a mathematical constant defined by the geometry of circles, and it can't be anything other than what it is. However, the fine-tuning argument isn't about redefining mathematical constants; it's about the specific values of the physical constants that govern our universe-like the gravitational constant, the cosmological constant, and the charge of the electron. These constants determine the structure and behavior of our universe. If they were even slightly different, the universe might not be capable of supporting life as we know it. It's not that these constants are unchangeable like Pi, but that their specific values appear finely tuned to allow for the existence of life. Now, let's address the Many-Worlds Theory. This interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that all possible outcomes of quantum decisions actually occur, creating an infinite number of parallel universes. In some of these universes, the physical constants would not support life. In others, like ours, they do. The theory posits that we find ourselves in a universe with the right conditions for life simply because we couldn't exist in any other kind. While the Many-Worlds Theory is fascinating and widely discussed among physicists, it remains one of several interpretations of quantum mechanics. It provides a naturalistic explanation for the fine-tuning, suggesting that our universe is just one of many where the right conditions happened to occur by chance. However, this doesn't necessarily negate the possibility of a designer. The fine-tuning argument suggests that the precise calibration of these constants points to an intelligent cause. Even if countless other universes exist, the fact that our universe allows for life can still be seen as evidence of design. The improbability of these constants aligning perfectly might suggest that a guiding hand was involved. Ultimately, the debate between fine-tuning and the Many-Worlds Theory reflects the ongoing exploration of our universe's mysteries. Whether through faith, science, or a combination of both, our quest for understanding continues. For me, belief in a higher power doesn't detract from the marvels of science but rather enhances the wonder of our existence. Thank you for engaging in this discussion. Remember, it's through these conversations that we deepen our understanding of the universe and our place within it. Stay curious and never stop seeking the truth.
@sordidknifeparty18 күн бұрын
As to the cosmological argument, we do not know that everything that exists has a Cause. The universe exists and we don't know that it has a Cause, to Simply claim that it does in your opening premise is begging the question . Secondly, we have never experienced true nothing. We have never in reality found a space that didn't have stuff in it, which wasn't permeated with fields. We have absolutely no idea of what the properties of true nothing would be. It could be that it's highly unstable, and prone to creating matter and energy. We just don't know Furthermore, quantum mechanics is discovering that at small enough levels it does seem that things are created and destroyed constantly with seemingly no cause. We have never seen anything above that Quantum level begin to exist in any meaningful way. Everything that we encounter is just reorganizations of matter and energy which already exists. A chair doesn't begin to exist, many molecules simply start to become a chair and eventually it's chair enough like that we say it's a chair, but there was no point where there wasn't a chair and then a chair began to exist . Quantum mechanics further muddies the question with experiments that seem to indicate that causality can work backward in time. Several experiments have been done which seem to confirm the fact that an event which has occurred in the past can be affected by an event which will occur in the future. Bizarre, I know, but look into it and you'll see I'm not making this up . It's called the delayed Choice experiment Finally, if it were in fact true that everything that exists requires a cause, and God exists, then definitionally God requires a cause. To Simply state that God doesn't require a cause is special pleading. I could just as easily say the singularity from which the universe came into existence requires no cause, but you wouldn't accept that. So neither will i.
@ArthurOdongo16 күн бұрын
He didn’t say “everything that exist”. He said @everything that begins to exist”. There is a difference
@DarkKnightArchive16 күн бұрын
The Cosmological Argument and Causality: It's true that we cannot empirically prove that everything has a cause, especially when it comes to the universe. However, the principle of sufficient reason, which states that everything must have a reason or cause, is a foundational concept in both philosophy and science. It’s not merely begging the question; it’s an attempt to understand the underlying reasons for existence. The universe’s existence without a cause would challenge our understanding of causality itself. The Nature of Nothing: You correctly point out that we haven't experienced "true nothingness." The concept of nothingness being unstable and potentially giving rise to matter and energy is intriguing and aligns with some interpretations of quantum mechanics. However, this does not necessarily negate the cosmological argument but rather adds depth to our understanding of how something could arise from nothing. This notion of instability in nothingness still leaves open the question of why there is something rather than nothing, which theists argue is best explained by a necessary being-God. Quantum Mechanics and Causality: Quantum mechanics does show that at subatomic levels, particles can appear and disappear in seemingly random ways. Yet, this quantum behavior does not straightforwardly scale to the macroscopic world we inhabit. The fact that quantum events appear uncaused does not invalidate the broader philosophical arguments for a cause of the universe itself. The delayed choice experiment and other quantum phenomena suggest that our understanding of time and causality is incomplete, but they do not wholly undermine the idea of a prime cause. Reorganization of Matter and Energy: It’s accurate that what we see in the universe is often a reorganization of existing matter and energy. However, the cosmological argument isn’t just about things beginning to exist in their current form, but about the existence of the universe itself. The question remains: Why does anything exist at all, rather than nothing? Special Pleading and God’s Existence: The assertion that God does not require a cause is not special pleading but rather a fundamental aspect of classical theism. God is posited as a necessary being-one that exists by the necessity of its own nature and does not depend on anything else for its existence. This is different from contingent beings, which do require causes. The singularity from which the universe emerged, if proposed as uncaused, would need to be a necessary being itself, but it lacks the explanatory power attributed to a transcendent creator. In conclusion, while modern physics and cosmology provide fascinating insights into the nature of existence and causality, they do not definitively rule out the cosmological argument for God's existence. The philosophical reasoning behind the argument complements scientific inquiry, offering a holistic view that seeks to understand why there is something rather than nothing, and why the universe operates with the order and regularity that it does. Finally, god bless you
@NightmareRex64 күн бұрын
mandella effect explained? seems to be two "timelines" otherwise why do peaople from 1960s remember SAME mandella effects that "changed" in 1970/80 as those born in 2000s that remember it changing in 2014?
Пікірлер
This feels like something I’d find on special features in a Justice League CD
And what ever you do, don't let Ra's A Ghul see this file 😮
Great video love watching this type of content just binge watched the rogue gallery video series I hope we get more videos talking about the rogues gallery or maybe have batman talk about his training with his mentors before he become batman or talks about the bat computer or talk about his family history or Wayne enterprises or his charities as a philanthropist or the bat vehicles
4:02 Wouldn't “Phantom Zone" be an option for everyone on this list?
This makes the whole doesn't kill thing make a whole lot more since, because he risk his salvation if he does cross that road.
Thank you, Kevin Conroy. RIP legend.
Lol batman didn't think of this when superman became the head of the regime
Is Bane compared to being like the devil himself, or is it the joker?
Or is Catwoman as devilish like the female demon named Lillith? Does she take lives of innocent people?
Let's also not forget one more crucial detail: There's a very good reason why Batman won't kill criminals like The Joker: IT'S WHAT THE JOKER WANTS! The Joker wants nothing more than to break Batman mentally. The Joker wants Batman to lose control. And The Joker wants to see Batman's sanity crumble. If the Injustice franchise has taught us anything, it is The Joker ALWAYS gets the last laugh. Even beyond the grave.
What about the Injustice league 😏
I’m always here for you Batman ❤️
Poor Guy Gardner. Wonder what he did to deserve being tested on by Batman
I hope that's a joke. Because his comic version did a lot.
@@SamuelGracefell Ik nothing about Guy Gardner so please inform me
@ice_springtrap8225 He isn't hated a lot (many people actually like him) but he was poorly written in a lot of series. Batman face punched him after guy challenged batman for the leadership role. Aside from that, he isn't very bright, is a jerk, occasional *ssh*le, committed sexual misconduct while drunk and he joined the red lantern corps. Though many fans don't consider this cannon, it is written.
@@SamuelGracefell what was he like in brave and the bold?
@ice_springtrap8225 I might not remember clearly since I saw it a long time ago, but guy was pretty decent in that. He did cause problems (fights) here and there, but aside from that and his arrogance, he was a good guy.
Missed your videos, hope you make more.
A lot more
BATMAN, religion itself is idolatry: love principles *NOT* people. With that said, If Jesus was the son of god, should the alien Races of Oa, Thanagar and Korugar worship him?🤔
Let's first address the notion of idolatry. True religion, at its core, is not about idolizing people but about embracing principles and values that transcend individual human beings. Christianity, when understood correctly, emphasizes the love of God and the adherence to principles such as love, justice, and mercy, which are personified in the figure of Jesus Christ. Jesus represents the ultimate embodiment of these divine principles. Regarding the question of whether alien races like those from Oa, Thanagar, and Korugar should worship Jesus if He is the Son of God, it's essential to recognize that the message of Jesus transcends human boundaries and cultures. If we accept the premise that Jesus is the Son of God, His teachings and sacrifice have universal implications. The principles He espoused-love, compassion, self-sacrifice-are not limited to Earth or to humans but apply to all sentient beings capable of understanding and embracing these values. However, worship in Christianity is not about forced allegiance but about a personal relationship with God through Jesus. The decision to worship or follow these principles would be a matter of personal conviction for any being, regardless of their origin. The essence of Christianity is the transformative power of love and redemption, which has the potential to reach and resonate with any soul, human or otherwise. Whether on Earth or in the far reaches of the universe, the principles of love, justice, and selflessness can guide any being toward a higher purpose and a deeper understanding of their existence. Ultimately, the core message is to love and uphold principles that elevate us beyond our limitations, much like the philosophy that guides me in my fight for justice in Gotham. Whether we’re talking about humans or aliens, the principles that Jesus taught can serve as a beacon for all.
i love jesus altho i dont like the archane 99/100 to hell system vs the non archane 1/3 to hell system (free will, ALL knowlage VS free-will and MASS deception)
I understand your concerns about the concept of hell and the different interpretations of salvation. It's a complex topic, and one that has been debated by theologians and scholars for centuries. However, let's consider a few points that might help clarify this issue. First, the essence of Jesus' teachings is love, compassion, and redemption. The central message of Christianity is that through Jesus, we have a path to salvation. It's not about arbitrary rules or a punitive system, but about a relationship with God, based on faith and love. The idea of free will is crucial here. God has given us the freedom to choose our path. This freedom means that we are responsible for our actions and their consequences. The notion of hell can be seen as the natural outcome of a life lived in deliberate separation from God, rather than a punishment imposed without reason. Moreover, the knowledge and understanding of divine justice are beyond our human comprehension. What may seem harsh or unfair to us might be viewed differently from a divine perspective, where ultimate justice and mercy are perfectly balanced. Regarding the concept of deception, it's important to differentiate between genuine faith and the misuse of religion by individuals who might twist its teachings for their own ends. True faith is not about being deceived, but about seeking truth and living according to principles of love, justice, and humility. Remember, Jesus' message was about offering hope, forgiveness, and a way to reconnect with God. It's about understanding that, despite our flaws and failures, we are loved and given the chance to turn our lives around. In defending the existence of God and Christianity, it's vital to focus on the core of Jesus' message - love, forgiveness, and redemption - rather than getting lost in the complexities of doctrinal differences. Faith is a journey, and each person's path to understanding and accepting God's love is unique.
This isn't canon to DC comics. Also God in DC is the Presence and it's existence as well as magic, demons, angels and all manner of creatures are explicitly self evident and commonplace unlike in our world.
Aww Batman's proud of his son 🥰
This was one of the best videos I've seen and I'm so glad I watched it praise God
Alfred has left very clear that he is a Christian and since he raised Bruce Wayne, I wouldn't doubt he raise Bruce as a Christian too.
I like this dynamic
This is “evidence”?! From the perspective of a Biblical archaeologist, I can’t even begin to enumerate the gross inaccuracies, blatant fallacies, and outright lies in this one...
I appreciate your passion for archaeology and your dedication to seeking the truth. As someone who values evidence and logical reasoning, I understand where you're coming from. However, let me address your concerns from a different perspective. Archaeological Evidence There are several instances where archaeology has supported biblical accounts. For example: The City of David: Excavations in Jerusalem have revealed structures that align with descriptions of the City of David in the Bible. The Pool of Siloam: Discovered in 2004, this pool matches the description in John 9:7 where Jesus heals a blind man. The Dead Sea Scrolls: These ancient manuscripts, discovered in the 1940s and 1950s, include texts from the Hebrew Bible that date back to the Second Temple period, confirming the antiquity and preservation of biblical texts. Historical Consistency The Bible, particularly the New Testament, contains numerous references to historical figures and events that are corroborated by external sources: Pontius Pilate: An inscription discovered in Caesarea Maritima confirms his existence and role as the prefect of Judea during the time of Jesus. Herod the Great: His extensive building projects and political influence are well-documented by historians like Josephus. Census of Quirinius: Luke 2:1-3 mentions a census during Quirinius's governorship of Syria, which aligns with historical records of a census around that time. Addressing Inaccuracies While there may be discrepancies and debates about specific details, it’s essential to consider the broader picture. The Bible was written over centuries by different authors with varying perspectives. Despite this, its core messages and many historical references have been remarkably consistent. Eyewitness Accounts The New Testament, particularly the Gospels, is based on eyewitness accounts. While written decades after Jesus' death, these texts reflect the testimonies of those who lived with and followed Jesus. Early church fathers, such as Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, also attest to the authenticity of these accounts. Philosophical and Moral Consistency Beyond archaeology, the Bible's philosophical and moral teachings have had a profound impact on Western civilization. Concepts of justice, mercy, and human dignity found in the Bible have shaped legal systems, social norms, and ethical standards. Faith and Reason Faith isn't just about believing without evidence; it’s about interpreting the evidence in a way that makes sense of the world and our experiences. While archaeology and history provide valuable insights, they are part of a larger tapestry that includes personal experiences, philosophical reflections, and spiritual insights. Conclusion As Batman, I rely on evidence, logic, and reason. While there may be debates and differences in interpretation, it’s crucial to approach the Bible with the same rigor and openness we apply to any historical text. By doing so, we can appreciate its profound impact on humanity and its enduring relevance.
Amen. U got my subscription
And fighting sports 🗿
Why does he dress like a demon?
There a Time & Place For Everything, Batman. Why? Because We're the Good Guys. (smile) In Time.
i'm glad you believed in god batman i accepted jesus as my savior and was baptized a year ago
Amen! Jesus Is Lord!
That was fantastic. It's clear a great deal of work went in to not only the edit itself, but presenting the information in a clear, concise and gripping manner. Bravo. I used to be agnostic, and was even an atheist for a short while. I had major issues with the church, and couldn't stand Christians. I didn't even like hearing (I am ashamed to say) Jesus's name spoken because of all the baggage that came with it. Many years later I have seen things most wouldn't believe. I have seen and heard and experienced enough to know for a fact that Jesus exists, he is the son of God and that God is real. That doesn't make things any easier, going from faith to knowing. It actually makes it much harder, because even if people are open minded and will speak with you about your experiences, no one has any answers. Still, I can't imagine existing without a relationship with God or Christ. It informs almost everything I do, and I am in constant contact with my savior. For any on the fence: seek God with a true and earnest heart and he WILL reveal himself to you. All you need to do is take that first step. Ask Jesus to come into your heart and soul and reside there with you. God is unknowable to men, so you must seek Christ, for if you reject the son, how can you possibly have a relationship with the father? That's it. And in time that seed of earnestness and willingness will become a mountain of faith. Besides, if God is the greatest good, the highest reality, and the greatest intellect, why would you not want to align yourself with the will of the greatest good, greatest intellect and highest reality? God bless.
Batman is as real as Jesus. :D
Empirically prove that pls
@@MAC_Productions Clearly its true since Batman was talking about god.
@@DeconvertedMan bruh
Comparing the reality of Batman to that of Jesus is an intriguing thought, but it's important to distinguish between fictional characters and historical figures. I, Batman, am a creation of the comic book world. My existence is rooted in stories, crafted by writers and artists to entertain, inspire, and explore complex themes. I'm a symbol, an idea, created to fight against the darkness within Gotham City. But at the end of the day, I'm fictional. Jesus, on the other hand, is a historical figure. There's substantial historical evidence that Jesus of Nazareth lived around 2,000 years ago. Multiple sources, both religious and secular, document his life and impact. The Gospels, written within decades of his life, provide detailed accounts of his teachings, crucifixion, and the claims of his resurrection. These documents have been scrutinized and studied by historians and scholars for centuries. The comparison also touches on a deeper level of belief and faith. Believing in Jesus isn't just about acknowledging his historical existence; it's about recognizing his teachings and the profound impact he has had on billions of lives throughout history. Christianity has shaped cultures, ethics, and civilizations in ways that are undeniable, whether one is a believer or not. While Batman is a figure of fiction designed to inspire hope and justice, Jesus is a figure whose life and message have inspired faith, transformation, and a moral framework for countless people over millennia. In Gotham, I fight against physical crime and corruption, striving to bring justice and hope to a city in need. But the message of Jesus addresses the human condition on a deeper, spiritual level. His teachings on love, forgiveness, and redemption provide a pathway to inner transformation and eternal hope. In essence, while Batman and Jesus may share the ability to inspire, their realities are fundamentally different. One is the creation of human imagination, and the other is a cornerstone of human history and faith. Thank you for the thought-provoking comparison. Remember, in our search for truth, it's crucial to discern the lines between fiction and reality, symbol and substance.
@@MAC_Productions checkmate.
Christ is King
I'm disappointed that Batman can't deduce that the Bible is mostly fiction. But I take comfort in 3 things. That this is not Batman but someone who projects his beliefs through Batman. That even if this was Batman.. well he met 'actual' gods, so that's fine in his reality. I personally prefer Batman when he was in more grounded stories, but I'm fine with a fictional character believing in another fictional character, as long as this has some meaning in a story. And that I'm okay with smart characters like Batman being wrong from time to time, or having flaws. Now, this is a nice presentation, and I generally like your videos. Great work with the voice and content. But if God exists or not, is a debate that can never be resolved in a crystal clear manner. It all boils down to faith. I think that this 'Batman' thinks more like Daredevil than the Batman that I believe in. Here's my comments about this video: 0:55 You talk about consistency only in NT. Still that doesn't prove anything. Even Harry Potter is consistent and that's fiction. 1:30 Real locations are not proof. Spiderman 'lives' in NY but that's fiction. 2:30 How come these historians never talked about miracles and resurrections? 3:20 It is like you cherry-pick which scientists you prefer to believe. That's confirmation bias. 4:25 This starts well, but the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments are nothing but weak opinions. Just by displaying "accidental chance" shows that you have looked this from the perspective that suits you. 4:40 Personal experiences do not count. It may as well be a delusion. 5:37 Even if all that's bullshit, I'm glad that the message is positive. But the Bible and Faith can easily be distorted into justifying killing and torturing. So, please don't kill someone who works on Saturday! 7:35 Nice chapter. I like it when people try to look other perspectives. The spiritual world is something Batman could believe in, since in his universe he has seen zombies and resurrections (Ra's al Ghul for example). 9:12 What is that greatest purpose?
Harry Potter has 1 author. The new testament has several writers corroborating the same event The locations being mentioned is not proof, but it does show that the writers were familiar with the area, adding credibility to the notion that they were eyewitnesses Personal experiences do count in this context. It's this version of Batman explaining why *he* believes in God
I appreciate your thoughts and your passion for grounded, well-reasoned discussions. While our perspectives may differ, it’s important to explore these topics with respect and depth. Faith and Evidence: You're right that the existence of God ultimately involves faith, but faith is not opposed to reason. Historical and philosophical arguments can provide a rational basis for belief in God. The New Testament, for instance, offers historical consistency and early eyewitness accounts, which many historians find compelling when investigating the resurrection of Jesus. Historical References and Fiction: Consistency and real locations in the Bible don’t conclusively prove its divine inspiration, but they do lend credibility to its historical claims. Unlike fictional works, the Bible’s historical details have been corroborated by archaeological findings and extra-biblical sources. This doesn’t automatically validate every miracle, but it suggests the Bible is more than mere fiction. Historians and Miracles: Ancient historians like Josephus and Tacitus mention Jesus and his crucifixion. While they may not detail miracles, their references to Jesus lend weight to his historical existence. The Gospels, written by those close to Jesus, focus on his miracles and resurrection, which were central to their message. Philosophical Arguments: The Cosmological, Teleological, and Moral arguments are not mere opinions but long-standing philosophical discussions. While some may find them unconvincing, they provide a framework for understanding the existence of a creator. The fine-tuning of the universe, for example, suggests an intelligent designer rather than random chance. Personal Experiences: While personal experiences are subjective, they can be powerful indicators of reality. Many people, including myself, have had encounters that point towards a divine presence. These experiences, coupled with historical and philosophical evidence, form a cumulative case for belief in God. Faith and Morality: The misuse of faith to justify violence is a serious issue, but true Christianity, based on Jesus' teachings, promotes love, forgiveness, and peace. The New Testament condemns violence and emphasizes loving one’s neighbor and even one’s enemies. Spiritual Realities: In my universe, I’ve encountered extraordinary phenomena that challenge a purely materialistic view of reality. While fictional, these experiences mirror the spiritual truths that many believers attest to in the real world. Greatest Purpose: The greatest purpose, from a Christian perspective, is to know and love God, and to love others. This purpose provides a foundation for meaning, moral values, and hope that transcends our immediate circumstances. In conclusion, while faith in God involves personal belief, it is supported by a rich tapestry of historical evidence, philosophical reasoning, and personal experience. As Batman, I seek truth and justice, and these lead me to believe in something greater than myself. (I also have more answers to your questions in the comments that I have responded to. Also feel free to ask more)
@@DarkKnightArchive Having respectful debates is nice. You have a nice project here and I do follow you. I like your content. Regardless if there is a God or not, all we need is to be good to each other in this life. I appreciate it when religions are used for good. But there is also a dark side that we need to be aware of. Empty promises, false hope, holy texts used to rationalize bad behaviours and liars who take advantage of people in a weak state. My religious Batman would fight against all that.
@@Veins1 I appreciate your support for my content. The importance of being good to each other in this life is undeniable, and many religious teachings, including Christianity, emphasize this principle. The Essence of True Faith: True Christianity calls for love, compassion, and justice. Jesus' teachings focus on loving one's neighbor, caring for the marginalized, and promoting peace. When religion is practiced in its genuine form, it becomes a force for immense good in the world. Addressing the Dark Side: You're right; there are those who misuse religion for personal gain or to justify harmful actions. As Batman, I would stand against such abuses. The Bible warns against false prophets and those who exploit faith for selfish purposes. It's crucial to discern genuine faith from manipulation. Hope and Promises: While some may see religious promises as empty, many find profound hope and purpose in their faith. This hope can inspire positive change, resilience in adversity, and a sense of community. It’s important to distinguish between false hope peddled by charlatans and the genuine hope that sustains millions. Rationalizing Bad Behavior: Misusing holy texts to justify bad behavior is a perversion of faith. True Christianity does not condone violence, discrimination, or exploitation. The teachings of Jesus are clear in their call for humility, service, and sacrificial love. As Batman, I would confront and challenge any misuse of religion that harms others. Living Out Faith: The challenge for believers is to live out their faith authentically, demonstrating the love and justice that their faith demands. When practiced sincerely, Christianity motivates people to work towards social justice, support the needy, and build a more compassionate society. Fighting Injustice: A religious Batman would indeed fight against those who use faith to manipulate and harm. He would defend the vulnerable, expose corruption, and promote truth and integrity. The fight against injustice is a core part of both Batman’s mission and Christian teaching. In conclusion, while there are challenges and abuses within religious practice, the core teachings of Christianity align with the values of justice, love, and compassion. It’s essential to uphold these values and challenge any misuses of faith. As Batman, I stand for truth and justice, values that resonate deeply with the true essence of Christianity.
@@DarkKnightArchive I agree with all that. I do think however that Batman most of all believes in himself. He built his entire persona and life on his own. When in despair, I have never seen him pray or turn to God. He never expects a miracle to save him. He prevails on his own. Most weak people get on their knees and pray. Batman takes action to clean up Gotham. Also, Batman is control freak and has trust issues. He needs to be in control of everything... from Robins, to Gotham, to Superman! Perhaps if he knew for sure that there was a God (or any supernatural being) he would try to device a contingency plan to subdue them! I like how you use words to express yourself and this was a nice discussion! Thanks Batman!
Praise be to the only true God, the Lord Jesus Christ 🙏🏾 ✝️
I’ve always imagined Batman’s religious beliefs as being something like a mix of Roman Catholic Christianity and Episcopalian Christianity with a flavoring of Buddhism and a tacit acknowledgment of the Greek Pantheon (but only after meeting Wonder Woman).
Interesting, oddly specific. Could be, lol.
Couldn't have put it better.
Dude... THIS VIDEO IS WHY I USE KZread. To be able to find GEMS LIKE THIS. Thank you :) I believe in God too.
Aww man I thought it was gonna be the dark knight batman voice. R.I.P.
This is a great idea because many nonchristians might click on this video as a meme.
yea lol. altho the modern owners of the IP of batman milking it dry (66sne6) (disney) dont like God, i mean look at there 6-666 syolbol in name.
I saw how long it was before I clicked it, and thought it was going to take itself seriously and provide arguments. After watching it, I feel like it really is a meme. And I’m still an atheist.
Can this Batman be cannon to the DCEU. I would so watch this movie.
Rest In Peace Kevin Conroy.
Why? Because We're the Good Guys. Keeping the Faith in You, My Lord. Thank You, God. From the Bottom of My Bat Heart, Amen.
Amen, god bless you.
Science and Christianity are totally at odds. One of the foundational axioms of the scientific method is reproducibility. This is the concept that says that if an experiment is repeated in exactly the same conditions in exactly the same way, then the result will be the same, or within the same statistical distribution. If it were true that experiments could just go any way at all regardless of how you control for variables there would be no way to describe laws of nature, and no science. Christianity deposits the existence of an omnipotent God who interacts with reality by changing the laws of physics at whim. If it is true that such a being exists it is impossible to ever know what the outcome of any experiment will be, since every outcome is simply the whim of a Divine being and not the result of specific laws being followed. Both axioms cannot simultaneously be true, they are mutually exclusive. And this is true for all religions that believe in an omnipotent interactive God
It's funny that Christians try to take credit for what they did to help during a genocide while simultaneously celebrating as God ordained several other genocides. What the Nazis did was bad, but what the Israelites did under the command of your God, specifically killing every man and boy, Every Woman who was pregnant or had any children, crush the skulls of every single infant, and take the young girls that are left for yourselves to rape at your leisure. Please explain to me how this genocide was fine but the Nazi Genocide was not. I can explain perfectly clearly from a secular position why both of these genocides, all genocides actually, are horrendous and wrong . So I suppose that's something secular morality has that Christian morality doesn't, as you're forced to celebrate at least some genocides.
You like that story of Corrie Ten Boom huh? Saving all those Jewish people. Those Jewish people who you believe will be tortured in fire for eternity for failing to believe was she and you believe? Not okay for the Nazis to kill them, but fine for your God to torture them for eternity. Perfect sense.
Christians in the United States are largely conservatives. These are the same people that proudly brag about their Gun Arsenal that they're going to use to kill anyone that comes on their property, votes to have the death penalty instituted, vote to keep immigrants out of our country, vote to prevent programs that would feed or provide medicine for the poor or needy. It is clear that claiming to be Christian is not an indicator that a person will show any even marginal measure of forgiveness, tolerance, or compassion. Atheists are almost exclusively liberal voters, the party that supports feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, taking care of children who don't have parents, providing medical care for people who need it, to find non warlike solutions to International problems etcetera
The percentage of atheists in prison is almost zero. The percentage of the prison population which is Christian or Muslim is incredibly High. Countries which have high rates of religiosity, have the lowest standards of living, the highest crime rates, the highest poverty, the lowest education rates, the highest rates of violence etcetera, while Nations which are largely atheists rank among the best in the world on nearly every metric. It is pretty clear that having religion cannot be a strong indicator that a person will be good or moral, nor that being an atheist will mean they are immoral, quite the opposite in fact
Correlation vs. Causation: It's important to distinguish between correlation and causation. The fact that certain countries with high rates of religiosity have lower standards of living and higher crime rates does not necessarily mean that religion is the cause of these issues. Socioeconomic factors, historical contexts, and governance quality play significant roles. Countries with high poverty and crime rates often face complex challenges that cannot be attributed solely to religious belief. Prison Demographics: The demographics of prison populations reflect a variety of factors, including socioeconomic status, education levels, and systemic issues within the justice system. The high percentage of Christians and Muslims in prison might be more reflective of the general population’s demographics rather than the inherent morality of religious individuals. Additionally, many prisoners might identify with a religion for cultural reasons or as a source of hope and rehabilitation during incarceration, rather than as a genuine reflection of their pre-incarceration beliefs. Moral Behavior and Belief: Morality is not exclusive to religious belief, nor is it absent in atheists. People of all belief systems can exhibit moral or immoral behavior. Christianity teaches that humans are inherently flawed and in need of grace and redemption. This means that simply identifying as a Christian does not make one immune to immoral actions. True Christian teaching emphasizes transformation and living according to the values taught by Jesus, such as love, compassion, and justice. Positive Influence of Religion: Despite the criticisms, religion has been a force for good in many areas. Religious organizations often lead charitable efforts, provide social support, and promote ethical behavior. In many societies, religious institutions play a crucial role in fostering community, aiding the poor, and promoting moral values. Societal Benefits of Religion: There are numerous studies showing that individuals who engage in regular religious practices tend to have better mental health, lower rates of substance abuse, and greater social support networks. The sense of community, purpose, and ethical framework provided by religious belief can be beneficial to individuals and society. Atheist Nations and Metrics: While some predominantly atheist nations rank high on various societal metrics, these countries also benefit from strong governance, robust social systems, and high levels of education. These factors contribute significantly to their success and cannot be attributed solely to the absence of religion. Objective Morality and God: The existence of objective moral values provides a strong argument for the existence of God. If moral values are merely subjective and evolved, then they lack a solid foundation. Christianity posits that objective moral values are rooted in the nature of God, giving them an unchanging and universal standard. In conclusion, while the statistics about religiosity and societal well-being might raise questions, they do not provide a comprehensive picture. The relationship between belief, morality, and societal health is complex and influenced by many factors. Christianity offers a robust framework for understanding morality and provides a source of hope, purpose, and community for countless individuals. The existence of God and the teachings of Christianity remain a powerful and compelling foundation for moral values and ethical behavior.
Your personal feelings of warmth, or love, or strength, or expansiveness, or whatever you happen to be feeling that you're attributing to God, may be evidence to you, but by its nature it can't be evidence to anyone else. And if you have ever used psychedelic drugs, you will be aware that many of these same feelings, if not all of them, can definitely be achieved without any Divine assistance. Your brain is able to create those brain States that make you have those feelings
Gospel Accounts and Historical Reliability: The Gospels, while indeed biblical texts, are also valuable historical documents. They provide multiple attestations to Jesus' burial in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea. This is significant because it is independently reported in all four Gospels (Matthew 27:57-60, Mark 15:42-46, Luke 23:50-53, John 19:38-42). The criterion of multiple attestation increases the reliability of this claim. Early Creeds and Paul's Letters: Early Christian creeds, such as the one found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7, which dates to within a few years of Jesus' crucifixion, also mention Jesus' burial. Paul's letters are considered by many historians, including skeptical ones, to be genuine and early sources of information about Jesus. Roman Practices and Exceptions: While it is true that Romans commonly left crucifixion victims to rot or disposed of them in mass graves, there were exceptions. Roman authorities sometimes allowed for the burial of crucified individuals, especially in the case of those with influential friends or family. Joseph of Arimathea, described as a member of the Sanhedrin and a wealthy man, could have had the necessary influence to request and receive Jesus' body for burial. Archaeological Evidence: Archaeological discoveries have shown that tombs consistent with the description in the Gospels existed during this period. The discovery of the "James Ossuary" and the tomb of Caiaphas, the high priest who played a role in Jesus' trial, demonstrate that rock-cut tombs were used in Jerusalem at the time. Jewish Burial Customs: Jewish customs also play a role in understanding the burial of Jesus. Jewish law emphasized the importance of burying the dead, and leaving a body on a cross overnight was considered a violation of Jewish law (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). This cultural context supports the Gospel accounts of Jesus being taken down and buried before the Sabbath. Historical Consensus: Many historians, regardless of their religious beliefs, accept that Jesus was buried in a tomb. For instance, John Dominic Crossan, a highly skeptical scholar, acknowledges that Jesus' burial by Joseph of Arimathea is historically probable. Similarly, Bart Ehrman, another skeptical scholar, recognizes the burial as one of the more certain facts about Jesus' life.
Suggesting that a higher power is helping you in times when you are in need is totally uncompassionate to the countless individuals throughout history who have suffered and died horribly without anyone intervening, Divine or otherwise. What makes you so special that God reaches his hand down and helps you find your car keys, but let's that toddler remain locked in a Psychopaths basement being tortured? If your God does in fact sometimes choose to help people his choices are absolutely appalling.
Free Will and Human Responsibility: One of the central tenets of Christian theology is the concept of free will. God has given humans the freedom to choose their actions. This freedom allows for genuine love and moral growth, but it also opens the door to the possibility of evil actions. The atrocities committed by individuals are a tragic misuse of this gift of free will. Blaming God for human evil overlooks the responsibility we have for our choices and actions (Deuteronomy 30:19). The Nature of Divine Intervention: The idea that God selectively intervenes in our lives does not imply that He acts whimsically or with favoritism. The Christian understanding of God’s intervention is often subtle and not always in the form of miraculous rescues. God’s help can come in many forms, such as inner strength, courage, and wisdom to face difficult situations. The apparent randomness of divine intervention can be difficult to comprehend, but it's not necessarily a reflection of God’s character but rather of our limited understanding (Isaiah 55:8-9). The Mystery of Suffering: Christianity does not shy away from the reality of suffering. The Bible is filled with accounts of individuals who suffered greatly, yet maintained their faith. Job, for instance, experienced profound suffering and loss, yet he held onto his faith in God’s ultimate goodness. The presence of suffering in the world is a complex issue that intersects with human free will, the consequences of living in a fallen world, and the mysterious ways in which God’s purposes are worked out through human history (Romans 8:28). Jesus and the Cross: The central event of Christianity is the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, which shows that God is not distant from human suffering. Jesus’ suffering on the cross is seen as God’s ultimate act of empathy and solidarity with humanity. Through Jesus’ death and resurrection, Christians believe that God has provided a way to redeem suffering and offer hope beyond this life (Hebrews 4:15-16). The Role of the Church and Believers: Christians are called to be God’s hands and feet in the world, to bring relief and compassion to those who are suffering. While we may not understand why certain tragedies occur, we are called to respond with love and action. The church has a long history of providing care for the suffering, feeding the hungry, and advocating for justice. These acts of compassion are ways in which God works through believers to address suffering in the world (Matthew 25:35-40). The Hope of Redemption: Christianity offers a vision of ultimate justice and redemption. The belief in a final resurrection and a new creation where there will be no more suffering or death provides hope that the injustices and pains of this world are not the final word. This eschatological hope is a central aspect of Christian faith and provides a framework for understanding present suffering in the light of future restoration (Revelation 21:4). In conclusion, while the presence of suffering and evil in the world is a profound challenge, the Christian faith provides a robust framework for addressing these issues. It acknowledges human free will, the mystery of divine action, and the hope of ultimate redemption. My faith in God helps me to navigate the darkness, find strength in adversity, and work towards a world where justice and compassion prevail.
The seeming fine tuning of the universe implies that the various constants which describe the nature of our universe could have been anything other than what they are. There is simply no evidence that any of these values could be different. It is sort of like saying that if the value of pi were off by even one billionth, you wouldn't get true circles. Which is true, but silly, because Pi is defined by circles. Pi exists precisely because the geometry of the universe, and the geometry of circles, dictate what it will be, and it therefore cannot be anything other than what it is. It's very likely that the constants of our universe are like this, what they are because of the geometry of the universe and unchangeable . And if you don't like that one, and you just can't accept that the constants might not be variable, there's another theory in quantum physics called the many worlds Theory which is extremely popular among the leading physicists on the planet, which suggests that the Universe splits itself over and over again every time a Quantum decision is made, and therefore an infinite, or nearly infinite number of branching universes exist. There would therefore be countless other universes which did not have the correct constants and simply failed, and countless other universes like ours in which the constants were correct for life to develop. And obviously we should not be surprised that we find ourselves in one of these universes, as if we tried to exist in one of the other universes we wouldn't exist
The argument about the fine-tuning of the universe often leads to profound questions about our existence and the nature of reality. Let's break it down. First, you mentioned that there's no evidence the constants of the universe could be different, comparing it to the value of Pi. Pi is indeed a mathematical constant defined by the geometry of circles, and it can't be anything other than what it is. However, the fine-tuning argument isn't about redefining mathematical constants; it's about the specific values of the physical constants that govern our universe-like the gravitational constant, the cosmological constant, and the charge of the electron. These constants determine the structure and behavior of our universe. If they were even slightly different, the universe might not be capable of supporting life as we know it. It's not that these constants are unchangeable like Pi, but that their specific values appear finely tuned to allow for the existence of life. Now, let's address the Many-Worlds Theory. This interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that all possible outcomes of quantum decisions actually occur, creating an infinite number of parallel universes. In some of these universes, the physical constants would not support life. In others, like ours, they do. The theory posits that we find ourselves in a universe with the right conditions for life simply because we couldn't exist in any other kind. While the Many-Worlds Theory is fascinating and widely discussed among physicists, it remains one of several interpretations of quantum mechanics. It provides a naturalistic explanation for the fine-tuning, suggesting that our universe is just one of many where the right conditions happened to occur by chance. However, this doesn't necessarily negate the possibility of a designer. The fine-tuning argument suggests that the precise calibration of these constants points to an intelligent cause. Even if countless other universes exist, the fact that our universe allows for life can still be seen as evidence of design. The improbability of these constants aligning perfectly might suggest that a guiding hand was involved. Ultimately, the debate between fine-tuning and the Many-Worlds Theory reflects the ongoing exploration of our universe's mysteries. Whether through faith, science, or a combination of both, our quest for understanding continues. For me, belief in a higher power doesn't detract from the marvels of science but rather enhances the wonder of our existence. Thank you for engaging in this discussion. Remember, it's through these conversations that we deepen our understanding of the universe and our place within it. Stay curious and never stop seeking the truth.
As to the cosmological argument, we do not know that everything that exists has a Cause. The universe exists and we don't know that it has a Cause, to Simply claim that it does in your opening premise is begging the question . Secondly, we have never experienced true nothing. We have never in reality found a space that didn't have stuff in it, which wasn't permeated with fields. We have absolutely no idea of what the properties of true nothing would be. It could be that it's highly unstable, and prone to creating matter and energy. We just don't know Furthermore, quantum mechanics is discovering that at small enough levels it does seem that things are created and destroyed constantly with seemingly no cause. We have never seen anything above that Quantum level begin to exist in any meaningful way. Everything that we encounter is just reorganizations of matter and energy which already exists. A chair doesn't begin to exist, many molecules simply start to become a chair and eventually it's chair enough like that we say it's a chair, but there was no point where there wasn't a chair and then a chair began to exist . Quantum mechanics further muddies the question with experiments that seem to indicate that causality can work backward in time. Several experiments have been done which seem to confirm the fact that an event which has occurred in the past can be affected by an event which will occur in the future. Bizarre, I know, but look into it and you'll see I'm not making this up . It's called the delayed Choice experiment Finally, if it were in fact true that everything that exists requires a cause, and God exists, then definitionally God requires a cause. To Simply state that God doesn't require a cause is special pleading. I could just as easily say the singularity from which the universe came into existence requires no cause, but you wouldn't accept that. So neither will i.
He didn’t say “everything that exist”. He said @everything that begins to exist”. There is a difference
The Cosmological Argument and Causality: It's true that we cannot empirically prove that everything has a cause, especially when it comes to the universe. However, the principle of sufficient reason, which states that everything must have a reason or cause, is a foundational concept in both philosophy and science. It’s not merely begging the question; it’s an attempt to understand the underlying reasons for existence. The universe’s existence without a cause would challenge our understanding of causality itself. The Nature of Nothing: You correctly point out that we haven't experienced "true nothingness." The concept of nothingness being unstable and potentially giving rise to matter and energy is intriguing and aligns with some interpretations of quantum mechanics. However, this does not necessarily negate the cosmological argument but rather adds depth to our understanding of how something could arise from nothing. This notion of instability in nothingness still leaves open the question of why there is something rather than nothing, which theists argue is best explained by a necessary being-God. Quantum Mechanics and Causality: Quantum mechanics does show that at subatomic levels, particles can appear and disappear in seemingly random ways. Yet, this quantum behavior does not straightforwardly scale to the macroscopic world we inhabit. The fact that quantum events appear uncaused does not invalidate the broader philosophical arguments for a cause of the universe itself. The delayed choice experiment and other quantum phenomena suggest that our understanding of time and causality is incomplete, but they do not wholly undermine the idea of a prime cause. Reorganization of Matter and Energy: It’s accurate that what we see in the universe is often a reorganization of existing matter and energy. However, the cosmological argument isn’t just about things beginning to exist in their current form, but about the existence of the universe itself. The question remains: Why does anything exist at all, rather than nothing? Special Pleading and God’s Existence: The assertion that God does not require a cause is not special pleading but rather a fundamental aspect of classical theism. God is posited as a necessary being-one that exists by the necessity of its own nature and does not depend on anything else for its existence. This is different from contingent beings, which do require causes. The singularity from which the universe emerged, if proposed as uncaused, would need to be a necessary being itself, but it lacks the explanatory power attributed to a transcendent creator. In conclusion, while modern physics and cosmology provide fascinating insights into the nature of existence and causality, they do not definitively rule out the cosmological argument for God's existence. The philosophical reasoning behind the argument complements scientific inquiry, offering a holistic view that seeks to understand why there is something rather than nothing, and why the universe operates with the order and regularity that it does. Finally, god bless you
mandella effect explained? seems to be two "timelines" otherwise why do peaople from 1960s remember SAME mandella effects that "changed" in 1970/80 as those born in 2000s that remember it changing in 2014?