The areas were you find permeable rock, water and heat are more common than talked about here. We are very far from exhausting those areas. Going to enhanced geothermal systems opens up nearly the whole world for geothermal power plants. It is actually strange how little geothermal energy is used for producing electricity, space heating and industrial applications. It produces energy 24/7/365, is inexpensive to run, costs far less to build compared to nuclear and is that abounded, it could provide all the primary energy needs of the USA for example.
@mtamech53521 сағат бұрын
Was this channel made by Big Wind and Big Solar? It's not hard to make a propaganda video. This is a propaganda video as well. The truth is that it is impossible to pull off the tom foolery that is the green agenda without first turning the world into a 3rd world country. Do you know the environmental waste that comes from mining batteries. A whopping ton of rare earth metals are needed for EACH wind turbine, along with 500,000 TONS of concrete (FOR EACH ONE). Big Green DOESN'T work and steals billions of dollars from the tax coffers to give us less reliable energy from companies that oftentimes go belly up.
@ambergimbel2 күн бұрын
Ummm agriculture transportation is one of the top producers of CO2. NYC's food transportation is the highest in the country. Mid-sized cities are far more sustainable than large cities for this reason. I used to work in NYC and it was full of trash, everyone eats at restaurants, and the businesses' recycling services are scarce, if any. All but one friend moved away from NYC to cleaner mid-sized cities like Miami, Denver, San Diego, and parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota.
@adrienbeauduin63072 күн бұрын
I always hated Paris but last time I went, a friend gave me his bike and it was amazing. I still hate Paris, but transport is now great!
@GiacomoMilazzo3 күн бұрын
Being a recent video is very strange that no mention has been made to the real revolution in geothermal: the deep and everywhere millimetric wavelength drilling by Quaise Energy. That's really seems the future.
@symbioticape4 күн бұрын
I won't trust a word the WHO says
@gregderuiter5836 күн бұрын
It’s not propaganda it’s the truth !! There is no historical evidence at all of a leading correlation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. Without it, the AGW theory simply falls apart, as 'climate change' is just a new-fangled term for global warming. 'Climate change' became the term to use when there was no warming at all between 1998 and 2016, despite ever increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere. After the strong El Nino of recent years we are now in a multi years-long 'pause' in temperature rise, even though CO2 concentration continues to rise inexorably. There are no trends at all in extreme weather events including hurricanes and floods, fire burn acreage is at one of its lowest points since records began, and sea level has been rising at a constant 2mm/year for the last 8,000 years - prior to that, between 15,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago it rose 110m after the end of the last ice age. So, there is no 'climate crisis' and 'climate scientists' (actually just modellers, and look at the mess they've made of things recently) have never got any predictions right. We can no more "tackle climate change" than we can turn back the tides - temperatures have gone up and down throughout history, irrespective of CO2 levels. So we must start seriously questioning the 'climate crisis' nonsense being peddled by our government - it will bankrupt us and bring unprecedented restrictions on our freedom of choice and way of life - for no benefit at all.
@ratelslangen6 күн бұрын
You missed that cities and suburbs in the Netherlands are cut up into sections or made really windy, similar to us suburbs, except for walking and cycling, which have quick acces and even dedicated through fares, which means it the distance traveled by bike is way shorter than for cars, which really helps the bike win out for short to medium sized trips. Its not just traffic calming, its actively discourcouraging rat running and preventing car from taking the most direct route, and forcing them onto dedicated ring roads, which means for short distances even for a rally driver with empty streets, its quicker to go by bike than by car.
@roelsiebrand71817 күн бұрын
Amsterdam wasn't bombed at all during WW2, Rotterdam was bombed but not completely flattened as stated in this video.
@docholiday91758 күн бұрын
That’s why most of us love living in the United States. We don’t answer to any of this nonsense.
@solal_ww8 күн бұрын
0:08 and there is already a mistake... you just had to check the map come on
@aassassin9 күн бұрын
Not a single second explained why automotive companies stationed at Amsterdam are so weak versus those stationed at North America. Smh.
@jesseknaub844210 күн бұрын
Where to hell does the Constitution say government pays for your hot water??? DAMN SOCIALIST
@xieulong10 күн бұрын
"Make it a pain to drive". Hah! It's already a pain to drive here in the US.
@aaronfloyd198510 күн бұрын
PragerU isn't right about communism either? I have lived half a century in communism and they fall short on that hateful system. If PragerU is equally right about the climate as they are about communism, they are absolutely right about everything. The equation is very simple.
@aaronfloyd198510 күн бұрын
What I know is that “Green” technologies is also a monumental business, I lnow that the western world was built over the fossil fuels, and I know that every millionaire in this world wants to have as many coastal real state properties is possible (the shores won’t be engulfed by the increasing sea level?) but those rich people also use big combustion cars, yatchs and jets to go everywhere including to meet each other in Davos to coordinate how to convince us to do what they not do. By the way, who earn a lot of money with the green extremism? I don’t trust in green “science”.
@markkronenberg470711 күн бұрын
I get what the author is saying about oil funding driving the message at Prager U. Can't the same argument be made about government funding for scientists where grants go to those who believe that humans are the main cause of temperature increases? If government grants went to neutral scientists who don't know how much of temp increase is man-made, wouldn't the results be more credible? Now I don't know which side to believe.
@AndrewNuttallWearsPants11 күн бұрын
Fervo's geothermal tech is pretty good, but Eavor's is significantly better. While Fervo relies on fracking tech, Eavor uses a closed-loop system that eliminates the fracking piece and all the problems that go with it. Details on Eavor's KZread channel.
@beyondfossil13 күн бұрын
Good summary. Also, people should check out Adam Ragusea's video about ways in which gas stoves actually underperform in cooking compared to electric induction. A big problem is the fossil fuel industry is adept at marketing and business. See how they labeled their product "natural" gas when it's just 99.9% methane (CH₄). Next to mother nature, the 2nd most powerful force on the planet is the fossil fuel industry with their massive annual profits, government subsidies and deep political influence. They own many high-ranking politicians like Greg Abott and Danielle Smith both of whom have zero shame in pushing blatant fossil fuel agenda out in the open. Countries around the world regularly go to war or engage in military operations _on behalf_ of their petroleum industries! As covered, methane has 80X the greenhouse potential as CO₂. In the US alone, there are over 2-million miles of gas piping and small leaks over such a long distance actually equally a lot of waste that directly accelerates global warming. The massive natural gas processing facilities actually freely vent large volumes of methane since its cheaper that way. This is called the *fugitive emissions* problem and adds some 6% annually to greenhouse gas emissions on a pure waste stream that costs the US billions annually. Methane is a lightweight gas that absolutely wants to escape any vessel it's contained within.
@Antwan8614 күн бұрын
“Paris” and “leading” in the same sentence 😂 This city is nothing but a combination of the worse from LA (cars) + a mess from Amsterdam (cycles everywhere).
@andrewmacnab2115 күн бұрын
Heat sand then heat water ? To improve efficiency
@maunaowakea77716 күн бұрын
4 P's (profit)
@andrewjenery178319 күн бұрын
Because in many nations, the sun is not strong enough, continuously enough.
@banksiasong20 күн бұрын
It's about progressive governments. While the Australian federal government was conservative, many states had progressive governments which gave rebates, and the cost/benefit ratio was worth the purchase, as well as reducing carbon emissions. Look at US states with higher solar, they will have progressive legislators.
@AnoNymous-dh2sv20 күн бұрын
Americans in the south States, should ALWAYS install those. They give hot water even from March.
@sebastianmontesinos169321 күн бұрын
America is not a country
@scottk496023 күн бұрын
If it's propaganda then you should take Dennis Prager's standing offer of cash to debate him. You will literally get paid to prove him wrong. Will you put your money where your mouth is?
@eriknervik900323 күн бұрын
But let’s be clear, liberals like you are who created SUVs with bad regulation. Whereas if CAFE was never passed then most Americans who wanted a luxury car would get sedans or coupes. The gas guzzler tax is what killed the luxury coupe in America
@johnnydoe360323 күн бұрын
Blame Shifting Typical c0n-servative Trait. 😂😂
@82delta24 күн бұрын
Just install a vent...DOOOOOH !!!!! LOL...let the (D)propaganda begin. USING KIDS AS PROPS LOL. (D)Biden is really working overtime on this NON ISSUE !!!! Q) which pollutes more ? ; 1) gas stove 2) Al Gore's private jet?
@multy62200225 күн бұрын
Ice Core Data which is real science shows that at the end of ever interglacial period over the last 300,000 years there was a spike in atmospheric methane. This could be the reason, that at the tundra melts due to the natural rise in temperature and it releases methane. The leap to the "man made climate change" religion, defeats the scientific method completely. I suddenly felt I was at a come to Jesus meeting of some fringe Jesus cult! There has been a spike in temperatures, a break from core data since 1900, which might coincide with mankind's use of "core fuels (no longer are they fossil fuels, except Coal)," and the massive jump in human population which are concerns, but THERE IS NO SETTLED SCIENCE on mankind's carbon output doing anything but greening the earth. So please stop the religion! Let's just stick with science. The only real scientific cause is that the tundra is melting at the end of our current interglacial period, so I guess governments should tax the tundra like they do cows.
@normanmazlin674125 күн бұрын
The typical, uneducated and opinionated Woke arguments are employed here. Attack the person and their assets rather than question their facts. For example: "....97% of scientists believe that humans are putting CO2 into the atmosphere and that CO2 contributes to climate change..." this fact is so specious it should not even be considered 'science'. It's a fact that man puts CO2 into the atmosphere. It's a fact that CO2 will have an effect on the climate. The real SCIENCE is accurately defining BY HOW MUCH....anything less than that is just Chicken Little screaming 'de sky is a fallin'
@tedclapham483326 күн бұрын
It is your information that is the disinformation! Your likely supporting the globalist/alarmist point of view started by the Club of Rome and now the WEF in their bid for totalitarian world government. The WEF has backed your side with tens of billions of advertising world wide, not just a few millions. Name 10 scientists who say definitively that CO2 from hydrocarbons is detrimentally affecting the climate, even the IPCC doesn't. It is the policy makers who interpret incorrectly the IPCC report who make the claims, also in the IPCC mandate they are told to ignore any natural causes of climate change, so their result will be biased. If you are paid to find a specific result you will find it if you wish to get paid!
@decnijfkris370626 күн бұрын
SMART AMERICANS NOT WANTING THAT CHINESE SHIT ON THEIR ROOFS
@lesvoutesparis135126 күн бұрын
Biking concept in Paris is forgetting old people and mothers with baby.
@simplypositiveme27 күн бұрын
Well, I grew up with gas stoves. I now have severe asthma at 51. And the last 20 years I was exposed to high radon. In between I was exposed alot of secocd hand smoke. (Sigh)
@godontog27 күн бұрын
We don't need any more censorship. PragerU videos bring another point of view to many subjects. If you watch the entire video instead of picking snippets, you may learn something. I am glad there are billionaires funding PragerU!
@passdasalt28 күн бұрын
I got my panels in 2009. Best investment I ever made. I haven't had a power bill since and even get paid almost $2K a year for my excess. South Australia got this right.
@southwerk29 күн бұрын
My thanks for a well done video essay.
@psyklown519829 күн бұрын
. I dont know how this country will survive with this generation coming up. Install a range hood for ventilation and come outside again, dont worry the sun wont melt u.
@Anikanoteven29 күн бұрын
Hmmmand the climate crisis industry hasn’t spent a dime😅
@dougandersen64529 күн бұрын
Carbon is good, more is better. I wasn’t paid one penny to tell the truth.
@dougandersen64529 күн бұрын
It takes money to tell lies, it also takes money to get the truth out there..😊
@davidunwin7868Ай бұрын
I love my solar. I only pay electric bills in winter. Cant wait for an EV to soak up all that extra exported energy.
@drraghunath83Ай бұрын
0:30 why is Australia mentioned twice in the chart?
@aur.cАй бұрын
It's very hard to compare Paris with Amsterdam or Copenhagen, Paris is very dense and has more than thrice the population
Пікірлер
The areas were you find permeable rock, water and heat are more common than talked about here. We are very far from exhausting those areas. Going to enhanced geothermal systems opens up nearly the whole world for geothermal power plants. It is actually strange how little geothermal energy is used for producing electricity, space heating and industrial applications. It produces energy 24/7/365, is inexpensive to run, costs far less to build compared to nuclear and is that abounded, it could provide all the primary energy needs of the USA for example.
Was this channel made by Big Wind and Big Solar? It's not hard to make a propaganda video. This is a propaganda video as well. The truth is that it is impossible to pull off the tom foolery that is the green agenda without first turning the world into a 3rd world country. Do you know the environmental waste that comes from mining batteries. A whopping ton of rare earth metals are needed for EACH wind turbine, along with 500,000 TONS of concrete (FOR EACH ONE). Big Green DOESN'T work and steals billions of dollars from the tax coffers to give us less reliable energy from companies that oftentimes go belly up.
Ummm agriculture transportation is one of the top producers of CO2. NYC's food transportation is the highest in the country. Mid-sized cities are far more sustainable than large cities for this reason. I used to work in NYC and it was full of trash, everyone eats at restaurants, and the businesses' recycling services are scarce, if any. All but one friend moved away from NYC to cleaner mid-sized cities like Miami, Denver, San Diego, and parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota.
I always hated Paris but last time I went, a friend gave me his bike and it was amazing. I still hate Paris, but transport is now great!
Being a recent video is very strange that no mention has been made to the real revolution in geothermal: the deep and everywhere millimetric wavelength drilling by Quaise Energy. That's really seems the future.
I won't trust a word the WHO says
It’s not propaganda it’s the truth !! There is no historical evidence at all of a leading correlation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. Without it, the AGW theory simply falls apart, as 'climate change' is just a new-fangled term for global warming. 'Climate change' became the term to use when there was no warming at all between 1998 and 2016, despite ever increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere. After the strong El Nino of recent years we are now in a multi years-long 'pause' in temperature rise, even though CO2 concentration continues to rise inexorably. There are no trends at all in extreme weather events including hurricanes and floods, fire burn acreage is at one of its lowest points since records began, and sea level has been rising at a constant 2mm/year for the last 8,000 years - prior to that, between 15,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago it rose 110m after the end of the last ice age. So, there is no 'climate crisis' and 'climate scientists' (actually just modellers, and look at the mess they've made of things recently) have never got any predictions right. We can no more "tackle climate change" than we can turn back the tides - temperatures have gone up and down throughout history, irrespective of CO2 levels. So we must start seriously questioning the 'climate crisis' nonsense being peddled by our government - it will bankrupt us and bring unprecedented restrictions on our freedom of choice and way of life - for no benefit at all.
You missed that cities and suburbs in the Netherlands are cut up into sections or made really windy, similar to us suburbs, except for walking and cycling, which have quick acces and even dedicated through fares, which means it the distance traveled by bike is way shorter than for cars, which really helps the bike win out for short to medium sized trips. Its not just traffic calming, its actively discourcouraging rat running and preventing car from taking the most direct route, and forcing them onto dedicated ring roads, which means for short distances even for a rally driver with empty streets, its quicker to go by bike than by car.
Amsterdam wasn't bombed at all during WW2, Rotterdam was bombed but not completely flattened as stated in this video.
That’s why most of us love living in the United States. We don’t answer to any of this nonsense.
0:08 and there is already a mistake... you just had to check the map come on
Not a single second explained why automotive companies stationed at Amsterdam are so weak versus those stationed at North America. Smh.
Where to hell does the Constitution say government pays for your hot water??? DAMN SOCIALIST
"Make it a pain to drive". Hah! It's already a pain to drive here in the US.
PragerU isn't right about communism either? I have lived half a century in communism and they fall short on that hateful system. If PragerU is equally right about the climate as they are about communism, they are absolutely right about everything. The equation is very simple.
What I know is that “Green” technologies is also a monumental business, I lnow that the western world was built over the fossil fuels, and I know that every millionaire in this world wants to have as many coastal real state properties is possible (the shores won’t be engulfed by the increasing sea level?) but those rich people also use big combustion cars, yatchs and jets to go everywhere including to meet each other in Davos to coordinate how to convince us to do what they not do. By the way, who earn a lot of money with the green extremism? I don’t trust in green “science”.
I get what the author is saying about oil funding driving the message at Prager U. Can't the same argument be made about government funding for scientists where grants go to those who believe that humans are the main cause of temperature increases? If government grants went to neutral scientists who don't know how much of temp increase is man-made, wouldn't the results be more credible? Now I don't know which side to believe.
Fervo's geothermal tech is pretty good, but Eavor's is significantly better. While Fervo relies on fracking tech, Eavor uses a closed-loop system that eliminates the fracking piece and all the problems that go with it. Details on Eavor's KZread channel.
Good summary. Also, people should check out Adam Ragusea's video about ways in which gas stoves actually underperform in cooking compared to electric induction. A big problem is the fossil fuel industry is adept at marketing and business. See how they labeled their product "natural" gas when it's just 99.9% methane (CH₄). Next to mother nature, the 2nd most powerful force on the planet is the fossil fuel industry with their massive annual profits, government subsidies and deep political influence. They own many high-ranking politicians like Greg Abott and Danielle Smith both of whom have zero shame in pushing blatant fossil fuel agenda out in the open. Countries around the world regularly go to war or engage in military operations _on behalf_ of their petroleum industries! As covered, methane has 80X the greenhouse potential as CO₂. In the US alone, there are over 2-million miles of gas piping and small leaks over such a long distance actually equally a lot of waste that directly accelerates global warming. The massive natural gas processing facilities actually freely vent large volumes of methane since its cheaper that way. This is called the *fugitive emissions* problem and adds some 6% annually to greenhouse gas emissions on a pure waste stream that costs the US billions annually. Methane is a lightweight gas that absolutely wants to escape any vessel it's contained within.
“Paris” and “leading” in the same sentence 😂 This city is nothing but a combination of the worse from LA (cars) + a mess from Amsterdam (cycles everywhere).
Heat sand then heat water ? To improve efficiency
4 P's (profit)
Because in many nations, the sun is not strong enough, continuously enough.
It's about progressive governments. While the Australian federal government was conservative, many states had progressive governments which gave rebates, and the cost/benefit ratio was worth the purchase, as well as reducing carbon emissions. Look at US states with higher solar, they will have progressive legislators.
Americans in the south States, should ALWAYS install those. They give hot water even from March.
America is not a country
If it's propaganda then you should take Dennis Prager's standing offer of cash to debate him. You will literally get paid to prove him wrong. Will you put your money where your mouth is?
But let’s be clear, liberals like you are who created SUVs with bad regulation. Whereas if CAFE was never passed then most Americans who wanted a luxury car would get sedans or coupes. The gas guzzler tax is what killed the luxury coupe in America
Blame Shifting Typical c0n-servative Trait. 😂😂
Just install a vent...DOOOOOH !!!!! LOL...let the (D)propaganda begin. USING KIDS AS PROPS LOL. (D)Biden is really working overtime on this NON ISSUE !!!! Q) which pollutes more ? ; 1) gas stove 2) Al Gore's private jet?
Ice Core Data which is real science shows that at the end of ever interglacial period over the last 300,000 years there was a spike in atmospheric methane. This could be the reason, that at the tundra melts due to the natural rise in temperature and it releases methane. The leap to the "man made climate change" religion, defeats the scientific method completely. I suddenly felt I was at a come to Jesus meeting of some fringe Jesus cult! There has been a spike in temperatures, a break from core data since 1900, which might coincide with mankind's use of "core fuels (no longer are they fossil fuels, except Coal)," and the massive jump in human population which are concerns, but THERE IS NO SETTLED SCIENCE on mankind's carbon output doing anything but greening the earth. So please stop the religion! Let's just stick with science. The only real scientific cause is that the tundra is melting at the end of our current interglacial period, so I guess governments should tax the tundra like they do cows.
The typical, uneducated and opinionated Woke arguments are employed here. Attack the person and their assets rather than question their facts. For example: "....97% of scientists believe that humans are putting CO2 into the atmosphere and that CO2 contributes to climate change..." this fact is so specious it should not even be considered 'science'. It's a fact that man puts CO2 into the atmosphere. It's a fact that CO2 will have an effect on the climate. The real SCIENCE is accurately defining BY HOW MUCH....anything less than that is just Chicken Little screaming 'de sky is a fallin'
It is your information that is the disinformation! Your likely supporting the globalist/alarmist point of view started by the Club of Rome and now the WEF in their bid for totalitarian world government. The WEF has backed your side with tens of billions of advertising world wide, not just a few millions. Name 10 scientists who say definitively that CO2 from hydrocarbons is detrimentally affecting the climate, even the IPCC doesn't. It is the policy makers who interpret incorrectly the IPCC report who make the claims, also in the IPCC mandate they are told to ignore any natural causes of climate change, so their result will be biased. If you are paid to find a specific result you will find it if you wish to get paid!
SMART AMERICANS NOT WANTING THAT CHINESE SHIT ON THEIR ROOFS
Biking concept in Paris is forgetting old people and mothers with baby.
Well, I grew up with gas stoves. I now have severe asthma at 51. And the last 20 years I was exposed to high radon. In between I was exposed alot of secocd hand smoke. (Sigh)
We don't need any more censorship. PragerU videos bring another point of view to many subjects. If you watch the entire video instead of picking snippets, you may learn something. I am glad there are billionaires funding PragerU!
I got my panels in 2009. Best investment I ever made. I haven't had a power bill since and even get paid almost $2K a year for my excess. South Australia got this right.
My thanks for a well done video essay.
. I dont know how this country will survive with this generation coming up. Install a range hood for ventilation and come outside again, dont worry the sun wont melt u.
Hmmmand the climate crisis industry hasn’t spent a dime😅
Carbon is good, more is better. I wasn’t paid one penny to tell the truth.
It takes money to tell lies, it also takes money to get the truth out there..😊
I love my solar. I only pay electric bills in winter. Cant wait for an EV to soak up all that extra exported energy.
0:30 why is Australia mentioned twice in the chart?
It's very hard to compare Paris with Amsterdam or Copenhagen, Paris is very dense and has more than thrice the population
VRAU BANI MEJ.CHES 990.BILLION. /£/data.3.maj.2023
Climate change, of course the climate changes, always has always will. Definitely not a crisis, biggest hoax ever.
America is a landmass comprising the totality of North and South America. USA and just a part of that landmass btw.
NO. and I say that Because Yes It is No
Look at the circular walls...they are so uniform and smooth