Martin Perhiniak is a Certified Adobe Design Master and Instructor. He was voted to be one of the top 10 Adobe instructors in the world by student feedback in 2015. In his online courses besides the technical knowledge you need, Martin will also teach you a lot about design principles, compositional techniques and plenty of best practices that he picked up and developed while working as a designer and retoucher on projects such as Pixar’s Cars and Toy Story, BBC’s Dr Who or Mattel’s Team Hot Wheels.
Пікірлер
I agree with the main premise of the video and I think that companies should be paying out royalties for copywritten images used in generation. Something like the way Spotify pays artists for each song played would be a good starting point. However, I feel it's disingenius to state that using AI generators is like torrenting, espectially after establishing that other generative programs are using their own libraries of non-copywritten material. It's also depressing to me that people wouldn't be on board with plebs have access to programs that would allow them to put their inner creative vision into images or videos. How many truly innovative ideas are we missing out on because they are stuck in the head of a trained teacher instead of a director or trained artist?
Shere Khan in Mowgli looks like he got fetal alcohol syndrome.
You'll have to update this video now because of Adobe's recent policy update about allowing them to use all work you make with their tools for their AI learning algos.
when I try it it doesn't render my image but a completely different creation. What am I doing wrong?
I'm completely new to this, is it okay to go on and learn Illustration with this?
Bulerian Jihad when?
If someone takes your course can they get the education rate with Adobe?
It´s done! There are no way comeback
Very interesting.
Amazing video
Simple solution: don't have a style.
This tutorial was as smooth as butter in Summer. Thanks! 🤜🤛
Adobe scraped all user images without letting users know and only belated tried to cover themselves with a new user agreement “clarification”. This is causing everyone to leave Adobe and stop all subscriptions, but Adobe forces every to agree to their new user terms even to cancel their subscriptions.
You know, I feel hand drawn art would pay alot more in the future, just like how hand made scarf are much more expensive than machine made one.
Hello! I'm thrilled to tell that im really impressed with your Udemy course. Our offer is to help increase enrollments and generate positive reviews plus more revenue. Let's connect & explore customized strategies to elevate the course even further. I'm eager to discuss on this exciting opportunity
I'm here because I need to create letters like your shirt. Do you have a video for this or can you create a video on this? Thanks...
Artists have been doing the same thing forever stealing and replicating other ideas so what's new ?
Humans =/= Machines. Learn the difference.
@@AlexW1495 still the same damn thing .
This was incredible and the result is amazing.
What good for art can come from this fuckery?
Thank you so much. Your tutorial is very wonderful
Would anyone know why this does not change the text size when the page size is changed? We have a 2-page document that uses paragraph and object styles. Even though we've selected Auto-adjust margins and Adjust font size, the page size changes, but the font size and margins do not. On 12JUNE 2024, we're working with InDesign 18.5.2.
Hello - I have an example of a picture that I want to create but I can't figure out what program or technique was used in Photoshop. Can anyone help? Thank you.
Okay so if you don't like the AI company scraping the internet for your art I understand that. But there's really no putting this cat back in the bag. Reason being, individual users using existing stable diffusion model and Midjourney 5 and 6 can either use any image they want as a reference image for a style or in the case of either model they can fine-tune either mid journey or stable diffusion around a set of say 10 to 100 images of whatever art they would like. So it's not just a matter of the company that made the engine irresponsibly or over aggressively scraping for art online, it's just how the thing works now even at the level of the end user. Mid journey is more of a service so I mean technically you can just stop it at their central office, but stable diffusion can be sort of easily run on any personal computer with a decent graphics card. So all the stuff that you already hate that comes from stable diffusion is literally going nowhere unless I don't know what, we lose electricity I guess.
THis is not working with the new update.
What do you think about the use of AI in the following case. I'm setting up a scene in 3D (nothing hardcore), but to save time and energy resources, I'm going to create a background (street, city, trees/forest, desert, mountains etc.) with AI, which I'll put behind it in post, and blur it as much as I need. Is it a sin, or simply stay at stock photoes? Im curious what do you think!
13:10 This sounds like a grade schooler wrote it....
Ux and ui design
Just look everywhere and you will see that ai is not only ruining the art. Read the bible and you will see what it really is for.
Board is gone :(
Unfortunately Adobe has removed this feature
P.S: To actually join the two points in PS (because the result in the video still has free-floating points), select all the points, and in the combine shapes menu (the one with two squares overlapping) click the "Merge Shape Components" option. This will unify the shape as well as turn any intersecting two points into one point.
'Adobe is undeniably the more ethical model' ... that's aged poorly
It was never legal to use any copyrighted material even for the research project that lead to the for profit version. These teams are liable and should be held accountable along with the for-profit companies. But how strong is your copyright really? In the US a copyright only states that the government agrees that you own the rights to the work you claim. Protecting your rights is 100% on you. To work a claim through the system could cost $100,000 or more just to get your case to the threshold of a courtroom. Many times more to try the case and you still could lose. And with “data washing” you would face a nearly impossible battle to prevail. The question of how different a piece needs to be from the original is subjective with no clear rules. And stealing in our society today holds very little risk for the thief. So what then? Have we already lost? Maybe. Or have we? What are we losing really? In the arts; in advertising; in entertainment; in every facet of every discipline - what haven’t we done? To me it has felt like we hit a brick wall decades ago. We ran out of ideas. But instead of stopping we just kept working - another painting; another Anime Character; another Photograph; another Fashion Dress; another bag for potato chips and box for cereal. Another Pop Song; another Story. But everything just feels like a slightly different version of something we have already done over and over and over. We can blame Tech or Social Media or the System but really, in my opinion, we’ve just done it. We’ve done it to death. But the profit machines need to keep churning so we keep rehashing, depending on younger people who never saw the originals. Maybe it’s time to let this kind of creativity go. Maybe we’ve done and said all that needs to be done or said with these tools. Maybe God recognized what a massive rut we’ve fallen into, re-making everything over and over, so he sent us Ai to get it out of our system and move on. “Want a painting of a Tuscan Landscape or an illustration of a Naked Cyberpunk slave trader? Here’s a hundred - in seconds, in every possible style. Now move on”. I don’t know what’s coming, but it’s coming, you can feel it. Will it be good? Will it be bad? Probably both. But maybe we’ll need our human creativity for much greater things. And isn’t this always the way? Corporations never have any new ideas, they just steal from what already exists. Ai tech is new perhaps, but the intent is just more of the same. Steal from the creative thinkers and doers. Maybe it’s time to think and do the completely new. That’s the gift of adversity, isn’t it?- to kick you in the butt. And God knows we’ve been needing a good butt kicking.
What a great video. It certainly was informative. I even found my images in the 'Have I been trained' tool.
Very good explanation of the Pen tool. Thanks
Thank you!
34:45 aged liked milk in light of Adobe's current TOS.
I have an idea ehy Don't us artist steal AI "art" and make them ourselves and then copy write the AI "art"
We have night shade. I'll be using that for my art.
i did everything u said and it doesnt work
Just like in books, I love the original ones.
This isn’t nearly as intuitive as Mix, which I would’ve had no problem paying for. Instead you nixed Mix with zero warning (goodbye projects!) & now i have this monstrosity to deal with, which this too rushed tutorial is not helping in the least 👍
AI is a tool, an outlet, for lazy people that don't want to put in the work.
need a library of artists who opt-in, where the business model of the library (shared equally amongst the artists) is to license art specifically and exclusively for training AI. Then scraping the photos/paintings changes from copyright infringement to actual theft and tortious interference. Make the fee several million dollars per painting for those who don't want their art used for training, and a more reasonable fee for artists who want to make a profit from AI scraping. Maybe even make the fee annual, as long as the ai trained by the data is available for use, the ai producers need to renew their license. Probably a dumb idea, but the transformative clause in copyright law means that we need a new direction reign in the art scraping.
We artists should all share a middle finger in our personal style that says : “ use this in your database, I agree” . A middle finger a day and that’s it.
This goes so far beyond simply "taking peoples' jobs." Machines have been "taking peoples' jobs" since the advent of industrialization. We are largely adaptable and know how to find other jobs, though we may not like or accept change at first. But AI taking over the creative sector is different, because art isn't just a job for people, it's a form of unique human expression. It's what we've been doing since the dawn of our existence on this planet. From cave markings to sculptures to museums full of incredible paintings, poems, and songs, spanning all throughout recorded history, we as a species have always been driven to express ourselves creatively. It's what makes us human. Flipping burgers doesn't make us human, being a lawyer doesn't make us human, any number of other careers and job descriptions is not what makes us who we are, at our cores. We are an imaginative, inspired species that thrives on creative expression in any form, we desire to communicate to ourselves and those around us. If you take that away from us, it will effectively neuter us. What are we without it? This constant flood of AI generated content is a devaluation of art right before our eyes. What will we become when our creativity means nothing anymore, when everything we see around us is no longer a part of who we are? That is what scares me the most. Losing our souls, not losing our silly jobs.
Hello sir . thank you so much for your courses can you please make a course ui/ux figma course ....
Are there any law firms interested in taking up a class action lawsuit against the AI community and anyone who used AI to produce something that referenced copyrighted material?
Amazing tutorial! I walked away feeling like I was able to express myself when I came back and used all your tips to create my version of your tutorial. Thank you so much.
Most ai art is photo bashed. Its just stolen Art from other people. If you make Ai art. You are in possesion of stolen images just so you know.