Martin Perhiniak is a Certified Adobe Design Master and Instructor. He was voted to be one of the top 10 Adobe instructors in the world by student feedback in 2015. In his online courses besides the technical knowledge you need, Martin will also teach you a lot about design principles, compositional techniques and plenty of best practices that he picked up and developed while working as a designer and retoucher on projects such as Pixar’s Cars and Toy Story, BBC’s Dr Who or Mattel’s Team Hot Wheels.
Пікірлер
37:20 - Did the painter completely miss the brush holder?
thank you for covering this. so many people really don't understand how AI was developed and how harmful it is to artists
Ai is the beginning of the end. A society of unskilled snowflakes of all ages.
Generative AI is a plagiarizing hack.
we may need to look at blockchain and nft's to bring about peer to peer interaction while we decentralise away from tech monoliths
Thank you for your work on this
Great Video. Thank you for sharing this.
clip artwork to artboard would be great
To be fair, lots of modern Art don't contain much emotion or something the artist want to transport. And AI Art has (for now) the problem to get the exact composition, content and style you want to achive. But i was non the less able to create some AI Pictures (with lots of itterations), some people stopped and ask questions about it. I newer saw the rendering process of an image as the most creative part of my pictures. The most creative Part for me was allways to get the vision of the picture/film and the rest was 'just' the skill to render it as fast as possible. I am really happy that AI helps me to speed up the Rendering of the Images/Films.
1. just like science starts with good intention it mostly goes the opposite way. see war and big pharma.. profits. something that should heal you should'nt keep you sick or dependant. 2. having a massive resource made of thousands of years of human results (art, literature, science, etc) it's still mind blowing to have access to almost everything and compile new ideas or give them a shape. yeah, the downside is this contest for $ (i'll remind you that there was no free tutorial back in my day). to be able to get in seconds something that you can think of.. fast sketching. just like i skipped the classic posing for my paintings and just went faster by having a quick photoshooting with my model. was that cheating? 3. i'm 41 yo and for more than 30 years i;ve been going on so many types of art that AI is to me like having an assistant and just delegating prompts. i have experience in digital art (illustration, fractal art), musc and songwriting, photography, airbrush work, glass, resin, wood and a few more). 4. artists will not be replaced, just filtered. this is how the market works. getting flooded by AI will just increase handmade's value. no matter how advanced an AI piece would get 5. should i be upset for having tens of thousands of my images ripped and marketed? our info is out there on every click so..
Sorry to play devils advocate, but didn't artists (specifically Painters) complain that their livelihoods would be gone when photography came along, it didn't happen. I am not saying AI "Art" is right or wrong, there are people who can't draw or paint to save their lives no matter how much they practice (me included), and they derive pleasure from creating/prompting in Midjourney or other AI sites, and based on some of the comments here you are happy to take that little bit of pleasure away from them.
Did photographers exclusive take photos of artists paintings? It's ok when people aren't good at something, that is not an excuse for leechware.
I learned how to use .bmp textures as a student more than ten years ago, but I have not had a texture lesson since then. This is all WAY cooler! Thank you!!
The irony is I've seen a lot of AI "artists" whining about "stealing and piracy" of "their" images. Also some people with Instagram accounts who's whole thinh is sharing other people's work without credit begging that people go credit them for their ai images.
3:17 windows phone start it first haha
It's not theft when you train a Large Language Model on all human literature? Is it not also theft if you train an AI on human faces from public records? I think it's tough that artists are being given the short end of a stick that was short to begin with. It's tough that society doesn't care about visual static arts as much as they care about cinema. I'm sorry but, making a living as an artist was always going to be like ice-skating up hill. You have to either be so shockingly talented AND have an in AND have a safety net (because for all intents and purposes, artists don't get hired, they get a freelance gig. Like being a ride-sharing-app driver. It's horrible being an artist for many many reasons. I think the technology will have a net positive effect on society and the economy, and more people benefit than do not, and there is not necessarily a cost or damage to artists. I think artists will have to do the work of AI-proofing their talent, but perhaps it might be easier to just take advantage of the new tools, that we artists all contributed to, albeit unwittingly. So if you can't beat em, join em. I believe artists can use these tools better than a typical laymen. It would make so many things easier for artists and make something that a layman can't with the same tools.
Thank you for filling in the blanks and having the argue-stretch for me up to this point. It's hard to know where to begin. I value the process of nearly 60 years that has had me draw, learn, try, fail, master most mediums, 2D and 3D, teach art, design and illustration for 21 years, loose my creative mojo, and find it again in liberated ways. This journey of depth and meaning that a human undertakes can not be replicated by anyone, least of all AI. It's called 'LIFE', and each one of us has a unique fingerprint and experience of it. People will get better at spotting AI art because sameness begets sameness, and lack of meaning contains no nourishment. Vision is something else entirely. Humans are the future.
I agree with the main premise of the video and I think that companies should be paying out royalties for copywritten images used in generation. Something like the way Spotify pays artists for each song played would be a good starting point. However, I feel it's disingenius to state that using AI generators is like torrenting, espectially after establishing that other generative programs are using their own libraries of non-copywritten material. It's also depressing to me that people wouldn't be on board with plebs have access to programs that would allow them to put their inner creative vision into images or videos. How many truly innovative ideas are we missing out on because they are stuck in the head of a trained teacher instead of a director or trained artist?
Shere Khan in Mowgli looks like he got fetal alcohol syndrome.
You'll have to update this video now because of Adobe's recent policy update about allowing them to use all work you make with their tools for their AI learning algos.
when I try it it doesn't render my image but a completely different creation. What am I doing wrong?
I'm completely new to this, is it okay to go on and learn Illustration with this?
Bulerian Jihad when?
If someone takes your course can they get the education rate with Adobe?
It´s done! There are no way comeback
Very interesting.
Amazing video
Simple solution: don't have a style.
This tutorial was as smooth as butter in Summer. Thanks! 🤜🤛
Adobe scraped all user images without letting users know and only belated tried to cover themselves with a new user agreement “clarification”. This is causing everyone to leave Adobe and stop all subscriptions, but Adobe forces every to agree to their new user terms even to cancel their subscriptions.
You know, I feel hand drawn art would pay alot more in the future, just like how hand made scarf are much more expensive than machine made one.
Hello! I'm thrilled to tell that im really impressed with your Udemy course. Our offer is to help increase enrollments and generate positive reviews plus more revenue. Let's connect & explore customized strategies to elevate the course even further. I'm eager to discuss on this exciting opportunity
I'm here because I need to create letters like your shirt. Do you have a video for this or can you create a video on this? Thanks...
Artists have been doing the same thing forever stealing and replicating other ideas so what's new ?
Humans =/= Machines. Learn the difference.
@@AlexW1495 still the same damn thing .
This was incredible and the result is amazing.
What good for art can come from this fuckery?
Thank you so much. Your tutorial is very wonderful
Would anyone know why this does not change the text size when the page size is changed? We have a 2-page document that uses paragraph and object styles. Even though we've selected Auto-adjust margins and Adjust font size, the page size changes, but the font size and margins do not. On 12JUNE 2024, we're working with InDesign 18.5.2.
Hello - I have an example of a picture that I want to create but I can't figure out what program or technique was used in Photoshop. Can anyone help? Thank you.
Okay so if you don't like the AI company scraping the internet for your art I understand that. But there's really no putting this cat back in the bag. Reason being, individual users using existing stable diffusion model and Midjourney 5 and 6 can either use any image they want as a reference image for a style or in the case of either model they can fine-tune either mid journey or stable diffusion around a set of say 10 to 100 images of whatever art they would like. So it's not just a matter of the company that made the engine irresponsibly or over aggressively scraping for art online, it's just how the thing works now even at the level of the end user. Mid journey is more of a service so I mean technically you can just stop it at their central office, but stable diffusion can be sort of easily run on any personal computer with a decent graphics card. So all the stuff that you already hate that comes from stable diffusion is literally going nowhere unless I don't know what, we lose electricity I guess.
THis is not working with the new update.
What do you think about the use of AI in the following case. I'm setting up a scene in 3D (nothing hardcore), but to save time and energy resources, I'm going to create a background (street, city, trees/forest, desert, mountains etc.) with AI, which I'll put behind it in post, and blur it as much as I need. Is it a sin, or simply stay at stock photoes? Im curious what do you think!
13:10 This sounds like a grade schooler wrote it....
Ux and ui design
Just look everywhere and you will see that ai is not only ruining the art. Read the bible and you will see what it really is for.
Board is gone :(
Unfortunately Adobe has removed this feature
P.S: To actually join the two points in PS (because the result in the video still has free-floating points), select all the points, and in the combine shapes menu (the one with two squares overlapping) click the "Merge Shape Components" option. This will unify the shape as well as turn any intersecting two points into one point.
'Adobe is undeniably the more ethical model' ... that's aged poorly
It was never legal to use any copyrighted material even for the research project that lead to the for profit version. These teams are liable and should be held accountable along with the for-profit companies. But how strong is your copyright really? In the US a copyright only states that the government agrees that you own the rights to the work you claim. Protecting your rights is 100% on you. To work a claim through the system could cost $100,000 or more just to get your case to the threshold of a courtroom. Many times more to try the case and you still could lose. And with “data washing” you would face a nearly impossible battle to prevail. The question of how different a piece needs to be from the original is subjective with no clear rules. And stealing in our society today holds very little risk for the thief. So what then? Have we already lost? Maybe. Or have we? What are we losing really? In the arts; in advertising; in entertainment; in every facet of every discipline - what haven’t we done? To me it has felt like we hit a brick wall decades ago. We ran out of ideas. But instead of stopping we just kept working - another painting; another Anime Character; another Photograph; another Fashion Dress; another bag for potato chips and box for cereal. Another Pop Song; another Story. But everything just feels like a slightly different version of something we have already done over and over and over. We can blame Tech or Social Media or the System but really, in my opinion, we’ve just done it. We’ve done it to death. But the profit machines need to keep churning so we keep rehashing, depending on younger people who never saw the originals. Maybe it’s time to let this kind of creativity go. Maybe we’ve done and said all that needs to be done or said with these tools. Maybe God recognized what a massive rut we’ve fallen into, re-making everything over and over, so he sent us Ai to get it out of our system and move on. “Want a painting of a Tuscan Landscape or an illustration of a Naked Cyberpunk slave trader? Here’s a hundred - in seconds, in every possible style. Now move on”. I don’t know what’s coming, but it’s coming, you can feel it. Will it be good? Will it be bad? Probably both. But maybe we’ll need our human creativity for much greater things. And isn’t this always the way? Corporations never have any new ideas, they just steal from what already exists. Ai tech is new perhaps, but the intent is just more of the same. Steal from the creative thinkers and doers. Maybe it’s time to think and do the completely new. That’s the gift of adversity, isn’t it?- to kick you in the butt. And God knows we’ve been needing a good butt kicking.
What a great video. It certainly was informative. I even found my images in the 'Have I been trained' tool.