Google why does kasporaf like magnus .=magnus defected Vishwanath!
@Amer1kop9 сағат бұрын
“Be the big brother!” (Until you’re an adult… at that point we’re not interested!)
@thecrippledone332517 сағат бұрын
Overrated is the word
@Schtoinkus23 сағат бұрын
I feel like if I was born into privilege and my father was skilled and eager to train me to do the one thing we both liked from the age of 5 and I only ever had to do that for my entire life I’d be just as good
@dayhawk12Күн бұрын
11
@punchgodКүн бұрын
Why the fuck does lex talk like that
@luigicantoviani3232 күн бұрын
Hikaru makes zero sense here.
@cosmiclight66332 күн бұрын
Magnus is socially dumb than hikaro
@mrose41322 күн бұрын
Kasparov showing pure class here
@rahulupadhyay35703 күн бұрын
Maurice Ashley is greater but no one talks about him because of politics.
@scruffygitt58263 күн бұрын
why is got-ham in this lol
@lavendergooms79583 күн бұрын
Hahahaha Levy
@dopeyaf824 күн бұрын
Paul morphy the goat
@lelouch84704 күн бұрын
After 40 games Magnus understood Hikaru’s weaknesses and Hikaru understood that Magnus has no weakness.
@user333-us4qz4 күн бұрын
AI is the Goat of chess
@Xxxxyyyyxxxx4 күн бұрын
come on guys... The 8 years old knows chess better than me :D little fail take her for the first stage, sorry guys
@slibbs28695 күн бұрын
It’s like Jordan vs Wilt. You give Wilt the same benefits of today’s technology and he’s probably still the best dude on the court
@tonisense01615 күн бұрын
The only game i remembered is fischer vs byrne
@nathen17905 күн бұрын
Well you can’t even say that he would just be an IM. He quit chess because he couldn’t find anybody good enough to play him. If he had the challenge that he had longed for then he would’ve kept practicing, inventing, and developing his tragedies. I don’t think he would’ve been WC or even come close to Magnus right now, but he definitely had the potential to be a modern day Grand Master and I stand by that..
@JosePanesso-mh2sd4 күн бұрын
He could have been magnus, we are talking about true, pure, unfiltered genius to differentiate yourself by hundreds of elo points to anyone in the world. Without the luxury of all the training books, theory, computers, nothing, he learned something off pure genius, hundreds of elo points into the realm of the unknown beyond what anyone else could do. Had he had the formalities of today, to add to his pure genius, he would easily stomp on most of today's GMs. We are talking 2400 before anyone else even hit 2100. More conservatively, let's say someone else managed to be 2200. That would be the equivalent of magnus being 3000 while the next best player who himself would maybe have 1 rival other than magnus, being 2800.
@JosePanesso-mh2sd4 күн бұрын
So it isn't some "wild theory" or estimation for you to say "I think he'd be a GM". No, he'd be a monstrous one.
@mk-ww7ii6 күн бұрын
Than he said ‘’i put him 16.’’
@palatonian96186 күн бұрын
Kasparov is a goat of a human. I've never heard him begrudge Magnus anything, even though they are often considered to be in competition for greatest. He was also one of the first chess figures to really accept computers, even though arguably he stood to lose the most from their rise. He's so humble and brilliant
@user-mt9mt5ms9e6 күн бұрын
Kasparov Azerbaijan?
@ludovicbeck27316 күн бұрын
Well, but see immediately this doesn’t make sense though… Cause, if he was able to “understand” your style of chess during those matches then why haven’t you done the same on your end ? Cause, sounds like you were both playing, but only him could retrieve useful information from those matches. And if that’s the case, then he’s just much better regardless. And playing these matches or not wouldn’t have changed a thing in the long run cause he would have figured it out and you apparently wouldn’t.
@pavankumar200017 күн бұрын
Alexander Alekhine (born October 31, 1892, Moscow, Russian Empire-died March 24, 1946, Estoril, Portugal) was a world champion chess player from 1927 to 1935 and from 1937 until his death, noted for using a great variety of attacks.
@alessandroguglielmo7197 күн бұрын
Sorry Garry,but youre the goat
@anshulff49587 күн бұрын
13 year magnus beats karpov 👽
@Billyball358 күн бұрын
"Very strong IM isn't saying much" Levy watching this
@BigZapdos9 күн бұрын
I’m a be honest it sound like Karpov and Fisher have pretty much the same style
@ethanalexpamujula-lf6gy9 күн бұрын
He shouldn't be mad. A computer can make complex calculations in milliseconds.
@michaelwright88963 күн бұрын
A machine can make millions of calculations in a second but Kasparov could calculate faster.
@ethanalexpamujula-lf6gy3 күн бұрын
@@michaelwright8896 naw
@phonegaming81229 күн бұрын
Magnus destroy everybody, him include... How can he said that... Delusional. He is one of the 3 goats but there is a reason why he is not THE goat, and that reason is call Magnus.
@harrycampbell75949 күн бұрын
I don't think chess requires genius, if you play chess from a child A lot during your developmental years and develop a neurology that is literally centred around chess patterns puzzles openings endings you'll become one of the best , if 90% of modern kids spent as much time playing chess as they do watching tiktoks theyd be grandmasters at 8
@niccolopaganini17824 күн бұрын
I'd do such things to my children when they're young once I have them. Make them learn different languages, making them learn music and chess.
@harrycampbell75944 күн бұрын
@@niccolopaganini1782 yeah I'll be the doing the same , martial arts chess music language
@AageKush3 күн бұрын
Everyone can play chess. Though, there's cognitive differences and limitations in people. Like in all sports, you see some kids are just built different and perform better than their peers despite comparative experience. Some brains are just built different as well. It's not a given anyone could play at the same level as current GM's even if they dedicated their life to chess from when they were toddlers. An average brain can become very good at chess. Only an extraordinary brain can become GM. The ELO rating system only measure players skills based on wins/losses against other rated players. The overall quality of players may increase, but no matter how good the average is, only the cream of the crop will be GM. You severely underestimate the current caliber of GM's and Super GM's. You also don't understand the definition of the grandmaster title. Only 0.85% of FIDE registered players are GM. ELO score of 2600 or above. The overall quality of players may increase, but there's still only a very small elite that can be GM. If every 4yo alive from today dedicated themselves fully to chess for the next 4 years it's not a given even a single one of them would become GM in 2028. Youngest GM ever was 12y and 4 months. Chess doesn't require genius. An idiot can learn to play chess. But to become GM stars have to align. You have to be born with incredible cognitive abilities on top of immense nurture and dedication from a young age. You're severely underestimating and trivializing what it entails to become a chess grandmaster. With pure dedication one may become a very good at chess, but chances are genetics will be the limiting factor stopping one short of the GM title.
@andrea66849 күн бұрын
But no one is like Tal ❤
@janicelgo452210 күн бұрын
I cant contain my jealously over his memory and recall (very important!)
@mr_mr10 күн бұрын
Where? Gary: behind me
@drisskettani169210 күн бұрын
Magnous
@vtwin197910 күн бұрын
Sooooo. Where do you put Magnus amongst all time greats???
@wasd____10 күн бұрын
I think Paul Morphy quit chess for more complicated reasons than having no competition. For one thing, he had a pretty awful time on tour in Europe, and might not have been inclined to keep traveling extensively in order to attend tournaments and matches. For another, at the time there wasn't really such a thing as a "professional chess player" and there really wasn't much of a living to be made at it. Chess was just a board game, and being extremely good at it was at the time viewed by and large as a novelty, not a respectable profession. A big part of why he quit chess was apparently because, sure, the chess thing was fun and all, but after a while he felt like it was time to settle down into a respectable professional life instead of just playing a game all day.
@rakshitjain345011 күн бұрын
He was talking about at last about magnus Carlsen 🐐
@ykwis12 күн бұрын
Father and son hahaha
@nerminsnowhuseinbasic934012 күн бұрын
Fischer would destroy him, this is just a lame attempt to make someone else legend, actually to make a guy legend who wasn't chanpion of the world which is stupid. This pathetic asian American and Norwegian drunk took over chess and are ruining it.
@wooshifgay4623 күн бұрын
If morphy was born in the same time period as fischer(or vise versa) morphy would wreck fischer
@AB-nb2iy3 күн бұрын
The only drunk is you
@muthukrishnan918313 күн бұрын
Hikaru trying to convince himself that Magnus is better of him😂
@abhimanyunaik955413 күн бұрын
Hikaru: This guy is superhuman Magnus:😏
@jonardcayton139514 күн бұрын
You cant easily beat an excellent positional player with attcking brilliance .Tal ,,fischer and morphy can still be at par with our present day chessplayers
@thomasSgacheru14 күн бұрын
What a bunch'o'bullocks 😂. Why did you not also take that opportunity to learn Magnus' style and go on to dominate him?
@Danobir15 күн бұрын
Tyler1 is one the way
@PurpleCh4lk15 күн бұрын
"He has this style where he uses the pawns to win, very great"
@ericlizada157016 күн бұрын
Magnus the GOAT Not kasparov
@rueltabanyagjr11716 күн бұрын
There's no engine that time
@asmithgames592616 күн бұрын
I'm beginning to feel like a chess god, chess god.
@Brukernavnn4 күн бұрын
All your pieces from the front to the back gone, back gone
Пікірлер
Google why does kasporaf like magnus .=magnus defected Vishwanath!
“Be the big brother!” (Until you’re an adult… at that point we’re not interested!)
Overrated is the word
I feel like if I was born into privilege and my father was skilled and eager to train me to do the one thing we both liked from the age of 5 and I only ever had to do that for my entire life I’d be just as good
11
Why the fuck does lex talk like that
Hikaru makes zero sense here.
Magnus is socially dumb than hikaro
Kasparov showing pure class here
Maurice Ashley is greater but no one talks about him because of politics.
why is got-ham in this lol
Hahahaha Levy
Paul morphy the goat
After 40 games Magnus understood Hikaru’s weaknesses and Hikaru understood that Magnus has no weakness.
AI is the Goat of chess
come on guys... The 8 years old knows chess better than me :D little fail take her for the first stage, sorry guys
It’s like Jordan vs Wilt. You give Wilt the same benefits of today’s technology and he’s probably still the best dude on the court
The only game i remembered is fischer vs byrne
Well you can’t even say that he would just be an IM. He quit chess because he couldn’t find anybody good enough to play him. If he had the challenge that he had longed for then he would’ve kept practicing, inventing, and developing his tragedies. I don’t think he would’ve been WC or even come close to Magnus right now, but he definitely had the potential to be a modern day Grand Master and I stand by that..
He could have been magnus, we are talking about true, pure, unfiltered genius to differentiate yourself by hundreds of elo points to anyone in the world. Without the luxury of all the training books, theory, computers, nothing, he learned something off pure genius, hundreds of elo points into the realm of the unknown beyond what anyone else could do. Had he had the formalities of today, to add to his pure genius, he would easily stomp on most of today's GMs. We are talking 2400 before anyone else even hit 2100. More conservatively, let's say someone else managed to be 2200. That would be the equivalent of magnus being 3000 while the next best player who himself would maybe have 1 rival other than magnus, being 2800.
So it isn't some "wild theory" or estimation for you to say "I think he'd be a GM". No, he'd be a monstrous one.
Than he said ‘’i put him 16.’’
Kasparov is a goat of a human. I've never heard him begrudge Magnus anything, even though they are often considered to be in competition for greatest. He was also one of the first chess figures to really accept computers, even though arguably he stood to lose the most from their rise. He's so humble and brilliant
Kasparov Azerbaijan?
Well, but see immediately this doesn’t make sense though… Cause, if he was able to “understand” your style of chess during those matches then why haven’t you done the same on your end ? Cause, sounds like you were both playing, but only him could retrieve useful information from those matches. And if that’s the case, then he’s just much better regardless. And playing these matches or not wouldn’t have changed a thing in the long run cause he would have figured it out and you apparently wouldn’t.
Alexander Alekhine (born October 31, 1892, Moscow, Russian Empire-died March 24, 1946, Estoril, Portugal) was a world champion chess player from 1927 to 1935 and from 1937 until his death, noted for using a great variety of attacks.
Sorry Garry,but youre the goat
13 year magnus beats karpov 👽
"Very strong IM isn't saying much" Levy watching this
I’m a be honest it sound like Karpov and Fisher have pretty much the same style
He shouldn't be mad. A computer can make complex calculations in milliseconds.
A machine can make millions of calculations in a second but Kasparov could calculate faster.
@@michaelwright8896 naw
Magnus destroy everybody, him include... How can he said that... Delusional. He is one of the 3 goats but there is a reason why he is not THE goat, and that reason is call Magnus.
I don't think chess requires genius, if you play chess from a child A lot during your developmental years and develop a neurology that is literally centred around chess patterns puzzles openings endings you'll become one of the best , if 90% of modern kids spent as much time playing chess as they do watching tiktoks theyd be grandmasters at 8
I'd do such things to my children when they're young once I have them. Make them learn different languages, making them learn music and chess.
@@niccolopaganini1782 yeah I'll be the doing the same , martial arts chess music language
Everyone can play chess. Though, there's cognitive differences and limitations in people. Like in all sports, you see some kids are just built different and perform better than their peers despite comparative experience. Some brains are just built different as well. It's not a given anyone could play at the same level as current GM's even if they dedicated their life to chess from when they were toddlers. An average brain can become very good at chess. Only an extraordinary brain can become GM. The ELO rating system only measure players skills based on wins/losses against other rated players. The overall quality of players may increase, but no matter how good the average is, only the cream of the crop will be GM. You severely underestimate the current caliber of GM's and Super GM's. You also don't understand the definition of the grandmaster title. Only 0.85% of FIDE registered players are GM. ELO score of 2600 or above. The overall quality of players may increase, but there's still only a very small elite that can be GM. If every 4yo alive from today dedicated themselves fully to chess for the next 4 years it's not a given even a single one of them would become GM in 2028. Youngest GM ever was 12y and 4 months. Chess doesn't require genius. An idiot can learn to play chess. But to become GM stars have to align. You have to be born with incredible cognitive abilities on top of immense nurture and dedication from a young age. You're severely underestimating and trivializing what it entails to become a chess grandmaster. With pure dedication one may become a very good at chess, but chances are genetics will be the limiting factor stopping one short of the GM title.
But no one is like Tal ❤
I cant contain my jealously over his memory and recall (very important!)
Where? Gary: behind me
Magnous
Sooooo. Where do you put Magnus amongst all time greats???
I think Paul Morphy quit chess for more complicated reasons than having no competition. For one thing, he had a pretty awful time on tour in Europe, and might not have been inclined to keep traveling extensively in order to attend tournaments and matches. For another, at the time there wasn't really such a thing as a "professional chess player" and there really wasn't much of a living to be made at it. Chess was just a board game, and being extremely good at it was at the time viewed by and large as a novelty, not a respectable profession. A big part of why he quit chess was apparently because, sure, the chess thing was fun and all, but after a while he felt like it was time to settle down into a respectable professional life instead of just playing a game all day.
He was talking about at last about magnus Carlsen 🐐
Father and son hahaha
Fischer would destroy him, this is just a lame attempt to make someone else legend, actually to make a guy legend who wasn't chanpion of the world which is stupid. This pathetic asian American and Norwegian drunk took over chess and are ruining it.
If morphy was born in the same time period as fischer(or vise versa) morphy would wreck fischer
The only drunk is you
Hikaru trying to convince himself that Magnus is better of him😂
Hikaru: This guy is superhuman Magnus:😏
You cant easily beat an excellent positional player with attcking brilliance .Tal ,,fischer and morphy can still be at par with our present day chessplayers
What a bunch'o'bullocks 😂. Why did you not also take that opportunity to learn Magnus' style and go on to dominate him?
Tyler1 is one the way
"He has this style where he uses the pawns to win, very great"
Magnus the GOAT Not kasparov
There's no engine that time
I'm beginning to feel like a chess god, chess god.
All your pieces from the front to the back gone, back gone
That is NOT Levy 😭😭😭😭😭