Luckily for us cars enthusiast, there is footage of the early days of the car and car racing, otherwise people in the future would hardly be able to trust what was done in those cars. Kinda awesome that the cinema and cars were invented at the same time 😂
@techwiz350619 күн бұрын
This video is just preambles.
@DysonSwarm27 күн бұрын
10:40 What if the particles are coming out of each body and they produce space waves , each particle has the same momentum and when they colloid, momentum becomes zero and no further waves are produced. These particles have a constant speed (c) and doesn't depend on the speed of the body producing them.
@Billfish57Ай бұрын
Richard has always been my favorite teacher since the first time I saw him. The best and I love this guy.
@duytdlАй бұрын
Oh may god! How does he deal with constant interruptions!? I mean, I get it as a host on a time-limited segment you have to squeeze a lot in but holy shit it's annoying. Kudos to Smolin for not flipping out.
@danielbrigham3233Ай бұрын
Phase pattern movement moment, lost now?
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-TimeАй бұрын
Could we have a probabilistic future coming into existence with the absorption and emission of light waves? We could explain light waves as a process over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics or photons as the future unfolds. A potential probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future unfolds with potential photon ∆E=hf energy, of what might happen, exchanging into kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, of what is actually happening. Light photon energy cascades down forming greater degrees of freedom for entropy and the irreversible processes of Classical Physics with heat energy always flowing from hot to cold and friction always changing motion into heat forming the ‘Arrow of Time’ within each reference frame.
@KevinsDisobedienceАй бұрын
What a case Lee made here. And the interviewer did a good job, too.
@elkhuntr2816Ай бұрын
Creative fiction. All the "puddle analogy" shows is that appearances can be deceiving. Just because something appears to be designed doesn't mean it was. It doesn't mean it wasn't either. What if the puddle found itself in a pool, a man made lake, a coffee cup? The puddle analogy doesn't provide any kind of evidence or argument on how you can determine if something is designed or not. You still have to investigate the evidence to determine if something is designed or not. The fine tuning argument provides this. The puddle analogy is simply an analogy, not an argrument.
@jonnymokaАй бұрын
Thanks for sharing
@Tbone913Ай бұрын
Couldn't a ring of gravity wave detectors around the apparatus (that are sensitive enough), detect which hole the electron went through?
@JesusOwnsАй бұрын
Fifth! You know you've found your passion when you can speak with such enthusiasm about it! It was a joy seeing his face light up talking about what he enjoys.
@Jackson_ZhengАй бұрын
The most impressive thing is that people actually laughed at the political expediancy joke when most would not be able to understand what he meant if Feynman gave the exact same lecture to people these days. The greatest thing we lost from the past is the depth of thought that people had and the willingness to think deeply about subjects rather than to confidently speculate about those that are outside of your field of expertise.
@dongameleone2489Ай бұрын
If we ever get to die and go to science heaven, I want to have a cup of jiggling atoms with this guy more than anything
@johnkoury1116Ай бұрын
Such an incredible documentary !!! Well done and well narrated. The collection of photos , videos and audio from all those people involved such a long time ago is absolutely wonderful!!
@georgecooke90102 ай бұрын
Richard Feynman talked about getting a 124 on the only IQ test he ever took. I think 160 or higher. He schooled NASA on the Challenger disaster. Rrocket science, safe cracker, extremely gifted at explaining complex subjects in understandable terms. A supurlative person!
@blessonsamvarghese45252 ай бұрын
What does the arrow described corresponds to ?
@MTGandP2 ай бұрын
Feynman says that there must be not any internal mechanism in the electron that determines which slit it goes through, because if there were, we would always be able to see it going through one or the other. But what if the electron does have that internal mechanism, but it only decides to use it if another particle bumps into it? The electron says, "I'm going to go through these slits like a wave, and interfere with myself, unless something bumps into me, in which case I'm going to go through slit number 2, which I already picked ahead of time."
@chillfluencer2 ай бұрын
Fourth!
@Warios4Christians2 ай бұрын
48:46 did a waveform hand geature
@dallasbrunson36772 ай бұрын
Great Scott! That’s the same narrator that did Threads! Outstanding
@Tacko142 ай бұрын
This is a vid 13 years old. Why haven’t I come across it before? I’m sure gplaps has seen and liked it. This is bliss.
@hermanvonsprudelwasser2 ай бұрын
38 min. ‘Financed by the german government! ‘ Rediculous understatement! It was Adolf Hitler guys!
@peterells17202 ай бұрын
Many thanks to Tinkerin' Thinkers for providing these four lectures. The lecture notes were written up as a book by Feynman: "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter". At the beginning of Chapter 1 he writes, " I prepared some lecture notes [on QED] and I went to New Zealand to try them out..." This book makes it easier to follow these lectures - it doesn't have the slips of the tongue or the sound problems. Of course, the videos show Richard Feynman as a complete human being, which no book could do.
@carlsmyth71982 ай бұрын
Brilliant
@garneauweld11002 ай бұрын
This is super-cool! I have always had a particular interest in pre-war, supercharged racing cars. They rock!
@divided_and_conquered18543 ай бұрын
If only Feynman could see the images we have now!
@stevensargent40593 ай бұрын
We all thought Art Carney from the honeymooners was dumb, sounds just like him
@ardaagn11053 ай бұрын
Hats off to the cameraman!
@wearemany733 ай бұрын
“Nature uses only the longest threads to weave her patterns, so that each small piece of her fabric reveals the organisation of the entire tapestry” - Richard Feynman.
@DeepFriedDave3 ай бұрын
Damn Mr. Feynman, what I would give to have had a teacher like you. Thank goodness we at least have some videos of you. Thank you universe for having been Mr. Feynman for a while.
@marcelgrguric37853 ай бұрын
Fantastic
@gerardopc13 ай бұрын
The best teacher we never had.
@damienluxford44803 ай бұрын
Fantastic video.
@simoncasson33273 ай бұрын
Super upload... had this taped on VHS years ago when it first was shown on TV. Lovely to see it again. Thanks.
@ve__the3 ай бұрын
In other words "Dont believe everything you think"
@user-un5vb9gq3t4 ай бұрын
?
@user-un5vb9gq3t4 ай бұрын
왜 고개숙이고있냐 킹받네 ㅋㅋ
@tolifeandlearning39194 ай бұрын
Brilliant lectures
@Gandalf_the_Fey4 ай бұрын
Only an idea, but it could be because each of us hold these silly irrational beliefs, or indeed know how we feel holding them - so we know how they feel about these and why they believe them - to cope.
@quentinbailey35824 ай бұрын
The accent is gold
@elberethreviewer55584 ай бұрын
What I heard from the first half hour of his speech was, if you have religious views that differ from what I'm about to say, I'm sorry, but you'll have to get over it or go somewhere else. He must have run into a lot of religious opposition from somewhere. Whoever got to him really got to him. Is New Zealand a very religious country?
@egillossur33884 ай бұрын
RIP
@aqu99234 ай бұрын
Despsir that now he is rarely delivering his public talks. I search every day if there is any fresh presentation by Lee. A great mind of the era yet so humble!
@jesperkouijzer38994 ай бұрын
Dont forget that the Miller engines where in the first way based on the Franse Peugeot engines (the first engine in te world with dubbel overhead camshaft) from 1914 ... the Peugeot L45 is the best example
@tolifeandlearning39195 ай бұрын
Great talk.
@tolifeandlearning39195 ай бұрын
Absolutely marvelous
@johntower20052 ай бұрын
😋😛😜🤪😝😘🤤
@Paulo_Dirac5 ай бұрын
4:10 Glasses..glasses everywhere
@johnguillemette19695 ай бұрын
I also laughed that he learned Spanish so he could talk in Brazil (For those not understanding, they speak Portuguese in Brazil).
@spaceghost89956 ай бұрын
This is my sleep aid. I don't actually remember anything he said even though I've started the video four different nights. 😂
@deepdrag81314 ай бұрын
I do the same thing - and I dream about subnuclear particles.
Пікірлер
Luckily for us cars enthusiast, there is footage of the early days of the car and car racing, otherwise people in the future would hardly be able to trust what was done in those cars. Kinda awesome that the cinema and cars were invented at the same time 😂
This video is just preambles.
10:40 What if the particles are coming out of each body and they produce space waves , each particle has the same momentum and when they colloid, momentum becomes zero and no further waves are produced. These particles have a constant speed (c) and doesn't depend on the speed of the body producing them.
Richard has always been my favorite teacher since the first time I saw him. The best and I love this guy.
Oh may god! How does he deal with constant interruptions!? I mean, I get it as a host on a time-limited segment you have to squeeze a lot in but holy shit it's annoying. Kudos to Smolin for not flipping out.
Phase pattern movement moment, lost now?
Could we have a probabilistic future coming into existence with the absorption and emission of light waves? We could explain light waves as a process over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics or photons as the future unfolds. A potential probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future unfolds with potential photon ∆E=hf energy, of what might happen, exchanging into kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, of what is actually happening. Light photon energy cascades down forming greater degrees of freedom for entropy and the irreversible processes of Classical Physics with heat energy always flowing from hot to cold and friction always changing motion into heat forming the ‘Arrow of Time’ within each reference frame.
What a case Lee made here. And the interviewer did a good job, too.
Creative fiction. All the "puddle analogy" shows is that appearances can be deceiving. Just because something appears to be designed doesn't mean it was. It doesn't mean it wasn't either. What if the puddle found itself in a pool, a man made lake, a coffee cup? The puddle analogy doesn't provide any kind of evidence or argument on how you can determine if something is designed or not. You still have to investigate the evidence to determine if something is designed or not. The fine tuning argument provides this. The puddle analogy is simply an analogy, not an argrument.
Thanks for sharing
Couldn't a ring of gravity wave detectors around the apparatus (that are sensitive enough), detect which hole the electron went through?
Fifth! You know you've found your passion when you can speak with such enthusiasm about it! It was a joy seeing his face light up talking about what he enjoys.
The most impressive thing is that people actually laughed at the political expediancy joke when most would not be able to understand what he meant if Feynman gave the exact same lecture to people these days. The greatest thing we lost from the past is the depth of thought that people had and the willingness to think deeply about subjects rather than to confidently speculate about those that are outside of your field of expertise.
If we ever get to die and go to science heaven, I want to have a cup of jiggling atoms with this guy more than anything
Such an incredible documentary !!! Well done and well narrated. The collection of photos , videos and audio from all those people involved such a long time ago is absolutely wonderful!!
Richard Feynman talked about getting a 124 on the only IQ test he ever took. I think 160 or higher. He schooled NASA on the Challenger disaster. Rrocket science, safe cracker, extremely gifted at explaining complex subjects in understandable terms. A supurlative person!
What does the arrow described corresponds to ?
Feynman says that there must be not any internal mechanism in the electron that determines which slit it goes through, because if there were, we would always be able to see it going through one or the other. But what if the electron does have that internal mechanism, but it only decides to use it if another particle bumps into it? The electron says, "I'm going to go through these slits like a wave, and interfere with myself, unless something bumps into me, in which case I'm going to go through slit number 2, which I already picked ahead of time."
Fourth!
48:46 did a waveform hand geature
Great Scott! That’s the same narrator that did Threads! Outstanding
This is a vid 13 years old. Why haven’t I come across it before? I’m sure gplaps has seen and liked it. This is bliss.
38 min. ‘Financed by the german government! ‘ Rediculous understatement! It was Adolf Hitler guys!
Many thanks to Tinkerin' Thinkers for providing these four lectures. The lecture notes were written up as a book by Feynman: "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter". At the beginning of Chapter 1 he writes, " I prepared some lecture notes [on QED] and I went to New Zealand to try them out..." This book makes it easier to follow these lectures - it doesn't have the slips of the tongue or the sound problems. Of course, the videos show Richard Feynman as a complete human being, which no book could do.
Brilliant
This is super-cool! I have always had a particular interest in pre-war, supercharged racing cars. They rock!
If only Feynman could see the images we have now!
We all thought Art Carney from the honeymooners was dumb, sounds just like him
Hats off to the cameraman!
“Nature uses only the longest threads to weave her patterns, so that each small piece of her fabric reveals the organisation of the entire tapestry” - Richard Feynman.
Damn Mr. Feynman, what I would give to have had a teacher like you. Thank goodness we at least have some videos of you. Thank you universe for having been Mr. Feynman for a while.
Fantastic
The best teacher we never had.
Fantastic video.
Super upload... had this taped on VHS years ago when it first was shown on TV. Lovely to see it again. Thanks.
In other words "Dont believe everything you think"
?
왜 고개숙이고있냐 킹받네 ㅋㅋ
Brilliant lectures
Only an idea, but it could be because each of us hold these silly irrational beliefs, or indeed know how we feel holding them - so we know how they feel about these and why they believe them - to cope.
The accent is gold
What I heard from the first half hour of his speech was, if you have religious views that differ from what I'm about to say, I'm sorry, but you'll have to get over it or go somewhere else. He must have run into a lot of religious opposition from somewhere. Whoever got to him really got to him. Is New Zealand a very religious country?
RIP
Despsir that now he is rarely delivering his public talks. I search every day if there is any fresh presentation by Lee. A great mind of the era yet so humble!
Dont forget that the Miller engines where in the first way based on the Franse Peugeot engines (the first engine in te world with dubbel overhead camshaft) from 1914 ... the Peugeot L45 is the best example
Great talk.
Absolutely marvelous
😋😛😜🤪😝😘🤤
4:10 Glasses..glasses everywhere
I also laughed that he learned Spanish so he could talk in Brazil (For those not understanding, they speak Portuguese in Brazil).
This is my sleep aid. I don't actually remember anything he said even though I've started the video four different nights. 😂
I do the same thing - and I dream about subnuclear particles.