ENEBA - great place to buy games (PS5, Xbox, PC)! ene.ba/Bang4Buck
All games, DLC! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-Store
Gift Cards! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-GiftCards
Affiliate
SCAN.CO.UK - A great place to buy PC parts tidd.ly/4aLCyyk
This channel is mainly about bringing gameplay from the latest games on PC, in a way that all the settings and in game performance is very clear.
My PC
Intel i9 14900KS
Custom Waterloop
EK-WB Velocity 2 RGB Alder Lake Water block
Mo-Ra 3 420 LT External Radiator
8 x Bitfenix 230mm fans Push Pull
EK-XTOP Revo Dual Water Cooling D5 Serial Pump
EK-RES X3 150 Lite
ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE DDR5 ATX Motherboard
MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB SUPRIM X
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 48 GB 2 x 24 GB DDR5 7200 MHz @8400MHz
Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass Case
Corsair AX 1200W Gold PSU
3x WD Black SN850X 2TB SSD M.2 2280 NVME PCI-E Gen4
Windows 11 Pro Version 23H2
Samsung S95B QD OLED 4K G-Sync 120/144Hz
Пікірлер
Does anyone else get worse performance the longer you play the game? It works pretty well for me for the first 20min, then I have to turn on upscaling to Quality, then eventually Balanced. And then restart my whole computer. Then repeat.
Damn not 100% gpu usage 5800x3d 4090 here 95%+ usage
It's the mod that introduces the GPU bottleneck. The vanilla game works fine.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer ah understand
Hey bro,just a personal question! I'm just wondering that what job or business you do to buy these kind of high end components? Also what's your age?:)
Nvidia may not rely solely on gamers' money these days. However, they could consider publishing cutting-edge PC-exclusive single-player games like Crysis and GTA to boost their graphics card sales. I'm fairly certain that a 3070 Ti or 4070 paired with a mid-range processor could outperform the PS5 or Series X with relative ease. They would have the capability to scale the game from a 4060 to a 4090, unlike current multi-platform games that mainly offer ray tracing, higher resolution, and increased FPS, without much difference in console and PC ports.
Man, that Ascension level is still brutal. lol
I was blown away when I first saw this game in 2007. I had just bought the PS3 at the time, but playing Crysis was like experiencing the next generation. I had to wait until 2016 before I was as impressed with the jungle rendering in other games (Uncharted 4). I played Crysis in moded DX9 very high settings (with DX10 effects) on my Core 2 Quad 6600 + 8800Ultra at 1680x1050p at only 30fps, but at the time I thought the game was perfectly playable. At 720p I had around 45fps and compared to PS3 games (Splinter Cell 4 20-30fps) I was really happy with the performance. My 8800U already died a long time ago, but I wonder how the game would run on this card with a much faster CPU and maxed out settings, because my Q6600 was certainly bottlenecking my 8800U. I saw a video with i7+8800U and the game ran at 50fps in 1080p with medium settings, so I think on similar CPU my old 8800U could probably run crysis 1 at 60fps at 720p with some medium / high settings.
why use 8x MSAA in 4K? This creates an unjustified, inadequate load on the video memory, while the 4090 chip itself is most likely loaded by a maximum of 20%.
Because the game is so single threaded, if you don't make it as GPU bound as possible, you just get a CPU bottleneck. You really don't gain anything from using less anti aliasing in this game.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer This brings us back to the fact that the game still runs poorly not because of the videocard, but because the CPU progress over the years has not been as fast as we would like. I think playing with 8x MSAA in 4K is about the same as playing in 16K, which is impressive even for a 4090.
They are not even remotely the same, try playing at native 8K and you would struggle. The bandwidth these newer cards have due to memory speeds and bus width make Anti Aliasing easy.
@@user-cn1qw5mm3j but because the CPU progress over the years has not been as fast as we would like. In reality, the issue lies in the game's inability to effectively utilize modern hardware. If someone had the time and resources, they could rewrite the game to be compatible with current-generation hardware. Although AMD and Intel could manufacture top-tier single-core, single-thread processors, there would likely be no market for them.
Whats the program to see all the parameters on the left? The temp usage etc
MSI Afterburner and Riva Tuner Statistics server.
This dude is trash in the game
2024 and we still can't run Crysis...
One of the best games ever made
The story is kinda weak, but it's an ok game I guess
For the full length video with performance stats kzread.info/dash/bejne/eo6M08eSlbGanto.html
The real ones know, just being able to play this game at 1080p 60fps back in the day was a flex. 2007 OG Crysis is still a Cryengine Legend
As far as I remember, there was never 60fps on release... there was a 25-40 fps on the GTX 8800 :)
@@user-cn1qw5mm3j I never used the words release.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer I remember playing this game on a amd 4870, man this game was brutal on hardware
Yep, and I can honestly say my mind wasn't blown again until DICE revealed BF3 in collaboration with AMD at a special event for the Radeon 7970 which then ran the demo on.
Crysis 3 was the best. The coding was made for multi core cpu's and the graphics were incredible. That's when the cry engine really shined.
i managed to get a used NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX for £720 when brand new they were about £1000 in the UK. the gpu box was brand new and the gpu looked like it hadnt even been touched. i got so lucky, i pretty much got a brand new card for a £280 discount because someone had returned it for whatever reason. i have had it for almost 7 months now and it is great
I can play better than this even with my hands tied
I am sure all 14 of your viewers are impressed by your skill. Keep up the good work.
why is the allocated VRAM so high? im getting stutters on a 8GB gpu
I’m stuck in an endless loop of remakes and rereleases.
Sorry guys I made a mistake on with the NVIDIA RTX 4090 native 4K results. Frame gen was accidentally enabled, and the correct score should be around 144 FPS. Native 4K ibb.co/wNR3dkd All other results however are correct, sorry for the confusion.
please answer my question bang4buck are you using frame gen on the native gameplay how are you getting 190 fps
The average FPS score on this video for the native performance was 175 FPS. I ran the scores again and I scored 144 FPS for native 4K with the same settings, and with frame gen on I s cores 174FPS. So I accidentally had frame gen on for my native results and that explains the inconsistency. I did check all the results again and the native 4K results is the only incorrect one. Even so I will pull the video and redo that part. Here are my screen shots for my results. Native 4K ibb.co/wNR3dkd Frame gen enabled ibb.co/6HSWvzP
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer Thank you so much for clearing this up mate. Great professionalism on your part I really thought my card was scuffed for a minute. I'm averaging 140fps same as you pretty much :)
How are you keeping your temps this low, insane. Love it
My card was only a few days old, and I live in the United Kingdom where October can be pretty cold. Finally I use a custom fan profile at around 70% fan speed with the stock cooler.
Thank you for the reply
@@Bang4BuckPCGamervery cool!
look the same with all that improvement, just imagine using that specs you have there on the old 2005 re4, your be blown away!
The 4090 is such a beast of a GPU, I can't imagine how good the 5090 is going to be. Such a nice fidelity and performance, even with DLAA at 4K. I have a question for you: do you think there will be a DLSS 4 coming, and if yes, what do you think DLSS 4 will be? There's a rumor going around on Videocardz and Reddit from a couple of months ago that it's going to be something related to AI texture/shading. If it's true, DLSS 4 is probably going to be a great tech improvement for VRAM and texture-related stuff.
I am looking forward to the RTX 5090 or any Titan class GPU. It sounds interesting, but I already know how it will be received. People will just say we first had fake frames, now we have fake textures. NVIDIA is going all in with AI, so I know DLSS will get some strong enhancements.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer Can't wait to see your RTX 5090 benchmarks! Your channel is my go-to for game benchmarks <3. Yeah, I've noticed some people despise DLSS or any other upscaler, calling it "fake frames" and such, but I'm all for better graphics and performance, "fake" or not. The thing is, DLSS now is not the same as it was 4 years ago, it's so much better. In 4K Quality mode, the quality is indistinguishable, and even in 4K Performance mode, there's only a minor difference in most games if you use preset E. Exciting times ahead for future DLSS tech from NVIDIA. Let them cook!
Well, nothing happens, the RTX 5090 in theory is going to be 48% more powerful, I think that with that it will never drop below 60 FPS in 4k with Epic Settings. It is logical, if you go here very fair, you should no longer go fair in the next generation. What do you think? As a last resort, you lower the resolution to 1440p and that way you play well and that's it, you compensate for the poor optimization of the game by having the best hardware.
The 5090 was always my plan, so I guess we will find out how fast it is when it comes out.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer ok, good.
i heard from other review videos that there is noticable input lag when you use DLSS + FG...how noticeable is it? I'm not sure i'd trade better visuals for slower react time.
Until you use it personally, I guess you will never know. It works perfectly fine and doesn't compromise your experience in a game like this.
compare with HT off and E cores off, see if u can do more OC
4:16 Anthony prime 2008
How much difference in performance is there, compared to the base game?
ps5 version is wow !
You avoided looking over the valley as it tanks frames, I have a 4090 too and I get smooth over 60 FPS but that valley makes it chug 😂
I avoided looking over the valley, because the boat can see you and you get shot at lol. As If I care if the fps drops, it's a performance video.
This game is meant to be experienced at native 4K. Truly something to behold
I'm the last person you need to tell that.
is this overclocked? I'm doing +180 core +1575 memory and im only getting 140fps everything maxed native 4k how are you getting 190??? im on 4090 7800x3d btw edit: gigabyte gaming oc 4090 card
so your 4090 is like manualy OC or some other stuff? i see it keeps stable on 3000+ also memory is very high.. how do you cool it so core is so stable and high?
This is just how the MSI Suprim X performs with the stock cooler. Sure I use a slightly more aggressive fan curve to help with the temps. But the Overclock is all manual, +1900 on the memory and +185 on the core, with max power limit and voltage.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer have you ever considered to test the 4090 with the 7800x3d to see if it performs better since the cpu bottleneck on the 14900ks is higher it seems from the benchmark results
120+W power draw difference between the 7800x 3d and 14900ks is crazy
test the newest AMD AFMF2 beta
Not until its out of Beta.
Not gonna lie this is the one game I thought the 7900xtx would win in lol.
Why?
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer forums and Facebook posts all saying that amd 7900xtx beats the 4090 in every call of duty. Nice to see it isn't true.
@@reviewforthetube6485 i believe in MW2 (2022) it did marginally beat the 4090 if i recall correctly i'm on the same boat, didn't expect the 4090 to pull that far ahead interesting.. although the 7900xtx is still the better GPU IMO given the price difference
@someone-wi4xl yeah I just wat he'd another live showcase and the 7900xtx edged it out. But again. Bang4bucj is getting amazing 4090 performance. I almost feel like some people are limiting the 4090 or something?
@@someone-wi4xl to be fair from what I understand Bang4Buck tends to OC the f out of his 4090 and intel cpu and cranks everything to the max I suspect he didn't do the same to his amd it's not really a good benchmark at all.
7800X3D is ~80C on some games even with custom waterloop? hmm i know it still safe, but its still hot plus what if you live in hot country
Despite the fact that this game does not use more than 11GB of VRAM at 4K/Max, it still runs out of VRAM on my 4070 Ti somehow. Looks like it is not able to allocate all 12GB of available memory (only 11,3GB), thus it switches a small portion of data (~500MB) to RAM. DLSS does not help here at the slightest. No matter what preset I tried to use, it still runs out of VRAM during a short run through Fleets End settlement. I imagine how bad of an experience 4060 provides in this game, since it has just 8GB buffer and can only run this game w/o any issues at 1080p with textures set to "Medium".
Do you still have LLC 6 on the asus motherboard? And also the Intel default settings?
LLC level 6 and custom settings.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer ok thx
I'm getting 45 fps max with the same card where ami going wrong ?
For the full length video with performance stats kzread.info/dash/bejne/gJ1n1KSHicnFnNo.html
it will looks same when it will get PS5 Pro enhanced update
Hardly. Guys running the best gpu and cpu. What I will say is this game is almost a direct port so resolution and framerates are the main differences nothing more.thisvcould be so much more enhanced for the high end pcs. Your ps pro will have +70% gpu power which equates to +25% ish performance so it would need to be +380% performance to equal what you are watching here. And that’s just the gpu….Sorry.
@@colinbrydon7659 really lol
@@sahibhamza3970 really really explain your views. Why do you think it’s going to be more powerful.
@@colinbrydon7659 ok
@@sahibhamza3970 The existing PS5 is a 10.28-teraflop console, but comparing teraflops directly between these consoles is complicated due to changes in AMD’s RDNA architecture. While it sounds like tripling the teraflops would be a significant performance increase on the GPU side, comparing the base PS5 and PS5 Pro would be closer to 10.28 vs. around 17 teraflops. It’s basically a 70% increase in power, so will equate to 20-25% performance increase. Really not worth the wait. Would need 2x performance or 100% performance increase for minimum 60fps on quality modes keeping resolution the same as well as details. All smokes and mirrors marketing jargon. Neither wonder consumers end up disappointed. THE GPU IN THIS VIDEO IS THE MOST POWERFUL BY FAR AT 83t/fs and overclocked can be +100t/flops. So basically 8.3x the power of a console with near 4x performance increases. Simply it’s a £4K pc. So it’s quite obvious surely. At the end of the day a console is built to mass sell, cheap hardware and low grade now at mid gen. PC’s are the pinnacle of gaming and will never be caught by any console as new tech is always being released, but console’s stand still.
PS5 guys may ask.. Well we can do 4k 60 Hz at 499 USD and why the PC gamers spent 2999 on a PC. Well they would never understand it. Sure 4090 is expensive but the experience U get here while drawing that much power from ur walls is INSANE
Great video. Thanks for doing this.
Hello. Will you be returning your i9 14900KS to the store? Looks like 13 and 14 gen Intels are burning like matches.
Lol no, my processor works fine.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer so far
They are fantastic. No issues so far with the 14900
amd or intel i think 1.4 1.45 is quite high
الانترو في البدابه البنت الشعر الاحمر في اي لعبه هيا ما اسم لعبتها
Katarina from League of Legends
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer thanks naic intro all vedio
Graphic Ali not showing up in my settings
And that Guy talks in the same manner as Nil.
The game looks nice.
I find It’s such a bummer that your progression doesn’t carry over from ps5 to pc , I would’ve bought it again
If you buy something, it's rather to play the game from start to finish. For me, it's obvious. However, there's no big graphical difference compared to PC, although thanks to the higher resolution, the game looks sharper than on PS5, where often and densely native 4K/30fps is unattainable without using dynamic resolution