We strongly believe in "There is a winner in every student, Waiting to be discovered".
There is a number of Potential Students/Aspirants who are not able to continue his/her Studies/Preparation due to LACK OF RESOURCES. Through this channel, we are providing all the required guidance to LLB Students and Aspirants of all other Competitive Exams (in a phase wise manner).
"Ab inito" means 'From the beginning'. A topic on a particular subject shall be covered from basic to advanced level. So, it might be that one may get bored initially, but at the end of the video contents one will be equipped with sufficient knowledge to perform better in the concerned examination.
Service being rendered without any Charge (Free of Cost):-
1. Basic to advance knowledge of a Subject;
2. PYQ Analysis, to know Question Pattern of an examination;
3. Detailed and short Summary of Land-mark verdict of the Supreme Court.
4. Essay Writing;
5. How to improve Writing Skills; and
A lot in the list...........
Пікірлер
Sir agar 19:44 par, A ke bacchon mein only daughter hoti, fir kya A ki wife ko share milta ?
It is a case of bigamy means before 1955. Wives were getting share when the partition was taking place between two coparceners ( father and son). If son is not there and only daughter is available then the coparcenary property in the hand of father would be treated as his property as a sole surviving coparcener. And partition will not take place. I hope it is clear.
I think.......you should always add/use female members as well in every example or questions you give for better understanding of concept because from my perspective when i think what would be the answer if there are female members at every step....i get confused and it could be with other students as well following your videos...... @abinitio1 rest your teaching method and content is amazing....thanks you so much for that
The canter of power of a family system was always in the hand of male. A female was the only member whose membership with regard to a HUF was changing as per her marital status. Female's (specially daughter's) right on coparcenary property is the latest and progressive phenomenon which started in 1930s and still going on i.e. right of a daughter on agricultural land - a disputed matter. So, wherever example was required, we tried to incorporate. Video is just a supportive matter to make you understand about the concepts of HJF, HUF, Coparcenary right, legislative changes and so on. It is a very tiny part of knowledge base. In order to get clear picture on the subject-matter, one must read supplementary books like Poonam Pradhan on Family Law-II, and case-laws. Thanks for your valuable feedback. 🙏
great work done by @ab initio team
Thanks a lot 🙏
sir 14:23 w1 and w2 will collectively take one share na
Yes, that is why they git 1/200th share
@@ROHITKUMAR-nl5qg but will they get share separately in notional partition
Bigamy is not allowed after HMA,1955. Notional Partition is the concept of HSA, 1956.
Great work Rohit sir
Thanks a lot
I hope it was useful at the last moment
bhai iske aage ka solution daal do please.
sorry to inform you that we are running out of time for 6th Sem PYQ analysis. So we will not be able to make video on Family Law-II this time. Moreover, 3 videos of Muslim Law is enough to solve any numerical question. Just practice on its questions. It will be easy to solve. A Book (Only compilation of question paper topic wise and not the solution) on the same is available with Arora Graphics, Patel Chest (9650509200)
now worries. thanks for quality lectures
Thanks a lot for your understanding
If there is no doctrine of reprensentation in muslim law then why son and daughter of predeceased son inherit property?
Sir 5 minutes 33 seconds par jo question hai. Question number 1. 2022(2) - Ashok has the following properties: Sir can you please provide the answer to that question. Which of them is separate and which is ancestral ?
i) Under a will = Separate Property ii) Car purchase out of own earning = Separate Property iii) Inherited as a Class -I heir = Section 08 of HSA, 1956 = Separate property iv) Property received on partition = Coparcenary property with respect to his son. For more details and clarification please watch - kzread.info/dash/bejne/e4pl1pKNXZvdeNI.html
kzread.info/dash/bejne/rImfpKqLZ8WodsY.html kzread.info/head/PLNvAkJWOcTd2MULySpd_A1NH9_lYtGk2L
Okay sir. Thank you.
@@abinitio1Sir when we say "inherited" do we mean after the death of the person from whom we got the property ?
Inherited means property received under HSA. Intestate means the person died without giving instructions how the property will devolve.
Remarriage of Divorced Daughter: While the welfare of family members, including daughters, is a consideration, the mere purpose of remarriage of a divorced daughter does not automatically constitute legal necessity. However, if it can be demonstrated that the remarriage is necessary for her social well-being or is considered a duty in the community's customs, it may be considered a valid reason.
Here are references to some relevant case laws that address the issue of alienation of joint family property for the remarriage of daughters: Srinivasa v. Saraswathi Ammal (1957 AIR 577): In this case, the Madras High Court held that the remarriage of a widowed daughter could be considered a valid purpose for alienation of joint family property under certain circumstances, particularly when it was necessary for her social welfare and was not merely for personal reasons. Jaswantsingh v. Bholasingh (1986 AIR 1693): The Supreme Court held that alienation of joint family property for the marriage expenses of daughters can be justified if it is for their social welfare and not for merely personal reasons. Radhakrishna v. Saraswatibai (AIR 1966 SC 1884): In this case, the Supreme Court emphasized that the Karta's power to alienate joint family property for religious or customary duties and for legal necessity extends to actions that are essential for the maintenance and welfare of the family members, including daughters. V. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddi (1977 AIR 1944): The Supreme Court held that the remarriage of a daughter could be considered a valid purpose for alienation of joint family property if it is considered essential for her social well-being and if it aligns with the customs and traditions of the community. These cases illustrate that while the primary concern is legal necessity or benefit to the estate, courts have recognized certain social and customary obligations, such as the remarriage of daughters, as valid reasons for alienation of joint family property under specific circumstances.
Once the daughter gets married Legal necessity ends here. After marriage she become member of HUF of her husband. During divorce petition She can claim maintenance right if she is not economically independent. After 2005 she has right on coparcenary property which is based on gender equality. Remarriage "as social well being" is accepted but it cannot be considered as legal necessasity on the part of Karta, for which he has to alienate property. Hence, Karta cannot alienate property for remarriage of his any child (Son was not considered due to patriarchal nature of the society).
Srinivasa v. Saraswathi Ammal (1957 AIR 577): word "Could be" used Jaswantsingh v. Bholasingh (1986 AIR 1693): - talks about marriage of daughter and not remarriage Radhakrishna v. Saraswatibai (AIR 1966 SC 1884): - not talks about remarriage V. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddi (1977 AIR 1944): - word Could be used for remarriage Its true that the courts have recognized certain social and customary obligations. Moreover, it is necessary to get the context of the case to understand the observation/decision of the appex court. So before giving a attentive and proper reading of the case, I cannot have any contrary opinion. Untill I come acrossy any contrary view (after reading full judgement of the appex court) As per the reading of some cases and on my understanding I admit that Remarriage of any children (Daughter/Son) does not come under the preview of legal necessity and hence the property alienated by Karta for the purpose is invalid.
Bhai shab u were a student of FOL? Kyu na LLM krke idhr prof ban jao ..what a nice teaching style as well as presentation 🙌🙌
I am still a student of FOL (CLC). Last semester.
Thank you so much for these helpful videos Sir!
Most welcome 😊
Excellent explanation! This content is really insightful.... Great job!!
Thanks a lot
Idhar mother ko kyun Mila hai nagpur wale me .mother doesn't include step mom
As per Maharashtra amendment follows General rule of partition
Is pyq analysis of taxation law going to be posted?
yes
11:29 Trail Smelter Case (US/Canada) 13:20 Gabcikovo-Nagyamaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) 15:06 Pulp Mills ( Argentina/Uruguay) 17:09 (Costa Rica/Nicaragua) 21:44 Topic -2 24:00 Indian Council For Enviro-Legal (1996) 27:06 Indian Council For Enviro-Legal (2011) 27:18 Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum Case (1996) 30:43 Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (2000) 33:03 Intellectual Forum Case (2006) 36:16 Jitendra Singh (2019) 38:09 Hanuman Laxman Aroskar (2019) 41:44 Unit 3 43:09 Subhash Kumar 1991 46:37 Rural Litigation 1985 49:40 M C Mehta (Taj Trapezium Case) 1997 52:31 M C Mehta v. Kamal Nath 1997 57:39 M C Mehta v. Kamal Nath 2000 59:36 M C Mehta v. Kamal Nath 2002 1:00:03 Sachidanand Pandey 1987 1:07:20 Unit 4 1:12:03 M C Mehta (Ganga Pollution) 1988 1:13:26 M C Mehta (Kanpur) 1988 1:15:20 Delhi Bottling 1986 1:16:57 Municipal Council, Ratlam 1980 1:21:41 State of M.P. v. Kedia Leather & Liquor Ltd., AIR 2003 SC 3236 1:24:57 Forum Prevention of Envn. & Sound Pollution v. Union of India, AIR 2005 SC 3136 180 1:27:24 Church of God (Full Gospel) in India v. KKR Majestic Welfare Colony Welfare Association, AIR 2000 SC 2773 1:35:11 Unit 5 1:37:50 S. Jagannath v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 811 1:41:37 MC Mehta v Union of India, 1987 AIR 1086 (Oleum Gas Leak case) 1:46:23 Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 248 1:48:49 Unit 6 1:49:44 Techi Tagi Tara v. Rajendra Singh Bhandari & Ors, Supreme Court, Civil Appeal No. 1359/017, Judgement of 22 September 2017. 1:52:48 University of Delhi v. Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change & Ors. NGT Principal Bench, Appeal No. 112/2018, MANU/GT/0014/2021 1:54:44 QA 1:56:24 Unit 7
Thanks a lot 🙏
wow wow
Partition to 2022 m ho rha h fir cheenai m mother or wife ko share q nhi mila.
Due to partition Rule at chennai... One video is made on Rule of partion of 5 states, which came with State Amendment. Kindly refer to the video. this video will be helpful if you cover the earlier one.
Sir can you please solve family law 2, 2021 numericals of devolution of property
Yes we can provide solution of Numerical problem of Family Law-II, but this time we are working on subjects of 6th Semester specially PYQ Analysis, Case laws and few topics. Due to paucity of time we are unable to provide solution this time. Howerever, concept of solving numerical problem and solution of some numerical problem are available in the playlist. kzread.info/head/PLNvAkJWOcTd2MULySpd_A1NH9_lYtGk2L It will be sufficient to solve any numerical problem.
Please provide pdf
Please contact to Arora graphics, Patel Chest
Aise har subjects k liye videos bna dijiye
PYQ Analysis Videos on Ethics and Environment are available. Rest we are working on PYQ Analysis Videos on 1. Taxation Law 2. ADR and 3. Insurance and Banking Rest we are trying to cover Case laws of Taxation-law in detail
Ohh thank you@@abinitio1
Most welcome!
बहुत बहुत आभार और धन्यवाद
Most welcome!
Super video. Very informative
Thanks a lot
Thank a lot bro U videos really helpful us ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I love your teaching ❤❤ 😍😍😍😍 bro
Most Welcome!
❤❤❤❤❤
🙏 Thanks a lot
I request you to make video lectures on all law subjects of 5th &6th semester of LLB as per Du law faculty syllabus and make video on pyqs also...the videos you have made have helped me immensely.... please do cover all subjects of 5-6th semester of LLB as per du
Thanks a lot for your words. We are working on it and we will try to cover syllabus of 1st to 6th semester as soon as possible.
you must calculate once( vedio part at 27min ) each son get 6/21 , which is further subdivided into grandsons ,so the share will be different
Yes, each son is getting 6/7 X 1/3 = 6/21 = 2/7 (26:22 - 26:36), which is further divided and the allocated share is S1S1 = 2/7 S2S1 = S2S2 = 2/7 X 1/2 = 2/14 = 1/7 S3S1 = S3S2 = S3S3 = 2/7 X 1/3 = 2/21 I hope there would be no doubt how 6/21 became 2/7 and so the share of each grandsons
where is the rest of the video?
Please find the play list of IPR - 1 kzread.info/head/PLNvAkJWOcTd00Alvf7D-trQAgi9MPSMkT
Sir video was very helpful, please make on 2nd topic, exams are near..
We are sorry to inform you that we are working on the project of 6th Semester videos. So, we are not going to work on PIL this time. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. 🙏
Apne apna channel chalane ke liye exams postpone kara diye, ye bahot galat baat hai hai. Aur ek aur baat aapne previous year papers ka link bhi description me nhi daala hai. YOU ARE ADOLF HITLER. OUR ADOLF HITLER.
Thank You Rohit ji for making it crisp and simple.
Most Welcome!
Is illegitimate son entitled for share in partition?
Not during partition but gets share in personal property of father.
What will be the answer of jewels inherited of rs 10 lakhs from his father? Can a son claim partition or not? 2016(b) question
Here "inherited" refers to HSA, 1956. It is of Separate Nature. Hence his son cannot demand for partition.
25:20, pe son ka share 17/36 hoga na sir,aapne 7/36 likh diya kyoki son ko double share milta hai,,
If son and daughter both are there, residuary amount gets divided into the ration 2:1 Condition - 1 - Husband is alive and wife is dead for daughter (value of x) = 7/36; and for son (value of 2x) = 7/18 Condition - 2 - Wife is alive and Husband is dead. for daughter (value of x) = 17/36 for son (value of 2x) = 17/18 23:40 to 24:59-25:40 I hope, there would not be any confusion.
Thank you so much for sharing such helpful videos and being a saviour Rohit Ji
Thanks and Most welcome!
Plz make videos on rest subjects of 6th semester syllabus 🙏🙏..your video always prove to be worthy
Will try our best.
Most helpful video on env law on the internet.
Thanks a lot 🙏
Sir pdf description mei daldo..
Hi, if you are looking for the PDF of the lecture then sorry to inform you that it is not available. And if you are seeking for the pdf of Topic Wise PYQ analysis then it is available at Arora Graphics, Patel Chest. Ultimately your own notes will be helpful during examination. Good luck!
THANK YOU SIR
Most Welcome!
super duper analyst hai bhai mera
Thanks a lot 🙏
love u bhai
LOVE U BHAI
Thanks and Most welcome!
This is known as SMART WORK👌🏼
It comes after a lots of efforts and hard works. Thanks
love you bhai
Most welcome!
sir can you explain what the difference between involuntary and voluntary alienation
Voluntary Alienation - with unequivocal intention. involuntary alienation - Without consent or intetion of other coparcener/s. Voluntary Partition - With Unequivocal intention of severance and communicated to Karta. Involuntary Partition - at the moment of Conversion or marriage u/Special marriage Act.
@@abinitio1 thanks
Most welcome!
❤❤
Please provide link for the pdf of pyq analysis
It is available at Arora Graphics, Patel Chest
Where can i download the paper from
It is available at Arora Graphics, Patel chest. You can contact them. Topic wise Questions of all the papers are available there. All the best for exam!
Maza aa gya sir, aap to Eminem se bhi tez the 😅,mujhe bas ek doubt hai ki ye playlist mai family law 2 complete hai kya?
Due to paucity of time it is a bit fast. Yes, entire syllabus of family law-II is covered except few case laws.
Well explained!
Thanks