Пікірлер

• 
  @edwinotabor77319 күн бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @user-wc5ev9ny6v21 күн бұрын

  Nice one ❤

• 
  @jonyhopkins1Ай бұрын

  Sure it’s very hard work but we didn’t understand without explanation. We can’t repeat this

• 
  @kepronix1098Ай бұрын

  thank you for helping me in my TLE subject, All blessings to you my friend. “Philippians 4:13”. ✝️😀😘

• 
  @akalbilatimothyАй бұрын

  Thanks so much, I'll teach my children very well

• 
  @cavinomondi-tf8lkАй бұрын

  Thank you so much

• 
  @elizabethmarkus2997Ай бұрын

  Bravo good so understandable thanks

• 
  @elizabethmarkus2997Ай бұрын

  But It is too long

• 
  @ezekielclydelabrador8562Ай бұрын

  Real

• 
  @ituneigiri12352 ай бұрын

  Thnx for helping me do my homework ❤❤😊

• 
  @AdijatAbosede-tg9oi3 ай бұрын

  Nice job 😂🎉❤❤❤😊

• 
  @filipkoula14824 ай бұрын

  😯😮

• 
  @sneekysmurf47545 ай бұрын

  6 out of 10 but thank you I’m on the right track & and so are you

• 
  @sneekysmurf47545 ай бұрын

  Always spear to be available but nerve be/ “keep ur legs closed head up eyes open”-2Pac

• 
  @ThePaulTM5 ай бұрын

  Nice Video ! This is also how the Quad Step Strings of Helical Order for DNA and Creation of Life Forms work. This method does not use irrational Numbers so these polygons can form an accurate Helical Form without Pi. This Wonderful 3D Geometric Order is suppressed by the Important People who want everyone to buy their books about the Theory of Chaos.

• 
  @user-ry5hm7ho8t7 ай бұрын

  The equations are false.

• 
  @user-yb4kb8oy1v8 ай бұрын

  Tried this for regular polygons up to 13 sides and all are inaccurate. The hexagon is the closest but still not perfect and that can drawn perfectly accurately much more simply. Other methods give much more accurate result so for me this is a complete waste of time.

• 
  @pjaj439 ай бұрын

  Unfortunately most of these constructions are not 100% accurate. The square and the hexagon, yes. Whilst you can construct an accurate pentagon with only a straight edge and a pencil, this method is about 0.3% out. The heptagon and 9-gon are proven to be impossible so this can only be an approximation. The points 4,5,6,... define the radii of the circumscribed circles of the desired polygons. Unfortunately in the real world, these radii are not in a simple arithmetic progression. The errors in this method, starting at the square are (to 2 digits) 0, . 34%, 0, -.52%, -1.06%, -1.57%, -2.03% (10-gon) and so on. One further observation is that, in the video, the line AC does not pass through A! It misses by a small amount and this will throw off all subsequent points and constructions.

• 
  @rohanpatel236810 ай бұрын

  Aap konsi mechanical pancil use karte ho?

• 
  @LiquidAnomaly11 ай бұрын

  Bisect line A-B, by how much? 1/4th? 1/3rd? 10mm? 20m? 15m?

• 
  @matthewcrouse5449 Жыл бұрын

  Who discovered this? Is it in the Elements by Euclid?

• 
  @9tailspirit Жыл бұрын

  10 lakh view

• 
  @isaiahfayinto5898 Жыл бұрын

  I love this it has helped me a lot pls post more of this

• 
  @HolyKingdomnation Жыл бұрын

  Very nice video

• 
  @pepsiontop_ Жыл бұрын

  W rizz fr

• 
  @user-zj6wj7eg5q Жыл бұрын

  Dring

• 
  @rahulpatel7839 Жыл бұрын

  Thåñk yøu for this video

• 
  @haotrietdang3831 Жыл бұрын

  Best video ever Best video ever

• 
  @richardbailey2001 Жыл бұрын

  Would have been better without the terrible background piano noise....

• 
  @anuragtiwari1680 Жыл бұрын

  Tell everything without speak a word

• 
  @pranesht669 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you so much ♥️♥️

• 
  @amirahbello6123 Жыл бұрын

  Very helpful thanks

• 
  @Fifa_gamer_23 Жыл бұрын

  So helpful sir thankyou so much

• 
  @shubhamjyadav Жыл бұрын

  Thanks sir very helpful video ❤️

• 
  @florenceigbo9531 Жыл бұрын

  I can't see but it was relevant

• 
  @harshitjoshi1784 Жыл бұрын

  All stop commentons

• 
  @harshitjoshi1784 Жыл бұрын

  Yes

• 
  @pramodchandrapandey6190 Жыл бұрын

  My teacher also share this video India

• 
  @archnanayak4868 Жыл бұрын

  Helped me a lot saved me from my graphics teacher thanks a lot

• 
  @hirenmakwana900 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @marthachandu4760 Жыл бұрын

  Tq for your video this so Heplefull to me

• 
  @sachaindewmina5038 Жыл бұрын

  The music inspired me a lot

• 
  @DarthTwilight Жыл бұрын

  Are there some (I know I sound stupid because probably) formulæ that provide the angles and offsets between and for every additional side of these polygons, all the way to a circle? .....Iiiii'mmm... probably using shoddy terminology. Basically, angular relationships, offsets, etc. I never had the chance to learn geometry or trig (but topology weirdly enough is intuitive to me,) and had to teach myself from the ground up; seeing as my 5th grade teacher had it out for me, made sport of me by publicly relegating me to the hallway during maths, and started the ball rolling on screwing me with everything maths related, all the way through high school; thanks to permanent records. Frankly, none of them even knew what they were teaching, because they couldn't provide nor demand visual proofs, as they just copied from a textbook and whoever understood it? Great. As for everyone but the three or four Gausses? They didn't care what happened to us.

• 
  @theprodigyfmwm7509 Жыл бұрын

  There is a formula which relates the angles of all polygons. (number of sides - 2) x 180° = sum of internal angles (there isn't a shape with just two sides) This formula is based on two observations. One, any triangle has angles which add up to 180°. Two, any polygon can be divided into triangles. For example, have you noticed that a square is really just 2 triangles? Or that a pentagon is a triangle with two other triangles attached left and right? A hexagon is a rectangle (which contains two triangles) with two triangles on opposite sides. The same pattern carries on. From the formula you can calculate the angle of each corner: Sum of internal angles ÷ number of sides = angle of a corner I don't know of a formula that relates the lengths, unfortunately. But, according to this video's demonstration all the sides of the polygons are of equal length. But the circles have to get bigger. If a the circle is fixed, the side lengths of polygons with increasing number of sides must shrink. This is because each side length is a division of the circle. By analogy, if the pizza is divided more times, then each slice is narrower.

• 
  @randallmarsh446 Жыл бұрын

  bisect?

• 
  @69420guyhaha Жыл бұрын

  its nonagon not nanogon

• 
  @mariolegaspi681 Жыл бұрын

  Why not continue at the END of the ARC?

• 
  @shreyanshchauhan08th Жыл бұрын

  Thanks for this vdo.its really easy and helpfully. ❤

• 
  @hardikpatil1927 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks your method is so easy bro

• 
  @gugunkhongsai13 Жыл бұрын

  Effective and easy method. I'll try this method for my ES21151 drawing assignment

• 
  @shiyashibu3783 Жыл бұрын

  Hello I have a doubt when we draw this in chart what is length

• 
  @ashleycharles5255 Жыл бұрын

  Your utmost dedication towards your work has given me full confidence, Dr Ofenmu KZread channel. Sometimes we do need trust with a great sense of humor to get things accomplished, I never thought I could get cured from Herpes. Thanks for curing me Dr Ofenmu KZread channel

• 
  @RB-vf9xn Жыл бұрын

  Doesn't make PERFECT polygons. Just tried building and measuring in Geogebra and it fails to produce perfect equilateral polygons above 6 sides