Пікірлер

• 
  @flakcannonhans6170Күн бұрын

  This entire movie is just Bradley slander

• 
  @TheDominionOfElites2 күн бұрын

  Bradley is serving very well in Ukraine and destroying many Russian vehicles of all sizes. It also wrecked iraqi armour in the gulf war. The generals here were completely right. Being large and conspicuous doesn’t matter in the era of drone warfare and satellite reconnaissance. See how the Russians who made low-profile vehicles have increased those profiles by many feet with anti-drone cope cages.

• 
  @jesusdiaz37762 күн бұрын

  Bradley, Zumwalt, LCS, F-35 and now Constellation.

• 
  @ginog50374 күн бұрын

  Great movie scene! 👏 Still laughing 😃

• 
  @rtasvadam17765 күн бұрын

  5:55 The other side wont care.

• 
  @okisukmawan9 күн бұрын

  george' s (yours against tersebutlah juga' s lagi & lagi & seterusnya' s juga lagi & lagi &?! = or' s &: cina - cina, jepang, korea, india or' s & sakit - sakit pikiran jiwa raganya, radikalisme or' s & sudah dipecat' s., & seenaknya & semaunya saja juga' s lagi & lagi & seterusnya' s juga lagi & lagi., di: usa., jancok, bang ass jug l l

• 
  @Bruh-td7ex11 күн бұрын

  Ah no mention of the bmp1

• 
  @waltermater204211 күн бұрын

  Esta pelicula es muy famosa en ucrania .😂😂😂

• 
  @tuomaman288812 күн бұрын

  I used to fell for this kind of criticizm. The Bradley proved to ve very effective in combat and also the F-35 seems to be a very good fighter jet. Of course US military spends money sometimes in inefficient things and there is corruption, but ny nature, in every military it is line this. The decisions done by leaders are always far away from perfect.

• 
  @eastcoastsailingcenter776813 күн бұрын

  And then it was sold as a game changer in Ukraine

• 
  @zulualpha35514 күн бұрын

  T-90M prolly wanted to have a word with you. Yes, a tank which were put into service in 2012 were knocked out by 2x 1980s IFVs. Optic gone, hydraulic broken, crews left. That's from 25mm alone.

• 
  @geezlers13 күн бұрын

  Along with the many other things this movie gets wrong, one thing I've not seen mentioned is the original cost (that they probably made up, shocker) of $1.5 million per vehicle. That was in 1968, which is equivalent to $13.5 million in 2024. That's more than the price of an M1 Abrams. So yeah, not really a "bargain".

• 
  @dmitriyv710318 күн бұрын

  It's funny that along with his patience and nerves, the amount of hair on the guy's head also decreases over time

• 
  @OfCourseIStillLoveU19 күн бұрын

  The best thing is to read the wikipedia entry about the Bradley M2/M3. They really did find a reasonable argument for every design decision. Even for the embrasures. It's hilarious!

• 
  @whynot-tomorrow_194527 күн бұрын

  It's weird watching this "critique" as American Bradleys make mincemeat of Russian tanks and APCs in the fields of Ukraine.

• 
  @whynot-tomorrow_194527 күн бұрын

  I think they may have accidentally reinvented the light tank tbh xD

• 
  @PaulBreitner-ox6btАй бұрын

  Russian tech won over western tech in Vietnam, Georgia (2008), Syria and now Ukraine. Even a very old soviet air defense system shot down an "invisible" F-117 in Yugoslavia. But still some western propaganda is bragging about their tech. 😄

• 
  @usul573Ай бұрын

  No Russia hasn't won in Ukraine.

• 
  @miguellopez3392Ай бұрын

  ​@usul573 the US force the north Vietnamese to cease fire, the US then left and they broke the treaty by invading 2 years later. F117 was shot down because it flew the same path for 2 weeks straight and had its Bombay doors open, making it a non stealth target In a known bombing path as it was unmolested by the air defense system before that mistake. Old atacms missile are making it past S400 defense, something that was made to shoot down largest like atacms, this is russias most advance air defense system and is failing against a 3 decade old weapon.

• 
  @jonny2954Ай бұрын

  A Bradley just smoked a T-80BV with its TOW in Ukraine. That's why i'm here lol

• 
  @EggwardEgghands29 күн бұрын

  Russia has lost 500k men in permanent casualties, 5 times that of Ukraine. Russia's military is pathetic and humiliated.

• 
  @adamtruong175926 күн бұрын

  So? It's completely expected for losses to occur. What is unacceptable is when those losses become absurdly high (like those few thousand Russian armored vehicles that were destroyed in Ukraine).

• 
  @G-Cole-01Ай бұрын

  that ending bit is basically the cybertruck

• 
  @dannyzero6922 ай бұрын

  I love how they show the passing of time by using the former Presidents portraits.

• 
  @henrikmeid91982 ай бұрын

  BAINBw likes

• 
  @sylvan470702 ай бұрын

  This movie convinced me that an infantryman should be the final design authority on all aircraft.

• 
  @tommystoner6893 ай бұрын

  This didn’t age well. Through every conflict since it came into service, the features they are making fun off are what allows it to dominate on the battlefield.

• 
  @raymondyee20082 ай бұрын

  And it recently took out a BMP-2; i’m still waiting for BlackTail to give his critiques on his YT channel.

• 
  @someguy37462 ай бұрын

  @@raymondyee20082 Bradleys shredded a t90 with 25mm a couple months ago;t90 crew missed and the optics got shredded by the 25mm, Bradleys had no tow

• 
  @AnhTuNguyen-xb6wvАй бұрын

  @@someguy3746well at least the T-90 kept the crew alive. Well alive and one less limb

• 
  @jonny2954Ай бұрын

  It just TOW smoked a T-80BV.

• 
  @matthewjones393 ай бұрын

  It’s a shame that so many people think this movie is accurate.

• 
  @okay_ic3 ай бұрын

  Bradley vs T-90 and this short movie show us how easy we can fell to propaganda. Looks like Bradley is a good fighting vehicle and designed as it should be. But couple of years ago most of us (me included) thought that general is stupid and we all know better how it should be designed. Sad.

• 
  @PlayerJ13 ай бұрын

  Politicians still do this shit in congress

• 
  @shirolee3 ай бұрын

  This has aged well...

• 
  @markmiranda33643 ай бұрын

  so accurate... design engineer lol.

• 
  @lafayettemclaren51953 ай бұрын

  And Odin invented the Bradley...

• 
  @AC-SlaUkr3 ай бұрын

  Only the colonel was actually the bad guy in real life, but don’t let a rib-tickler if a story get in the way for historical fact.

• 
  @v4ngeloz3 ай бұрын

  "Actually sir that has come to our attention"

• 
  @mikerotch62343 ай бұрын

  Unironically the Bradley is such a cool piece of equipment tho (not literally cool, sorry for no air conditioning lmao)

• 
  @miswojtek61014 ай бұрын

  I just love how it's pictured with ukrainian flag in 0:06. They knew something.

• 
  @MyDoodad4 ай бұрын

  Thought as a joke, is now considered the most effective fighting vehicle in a 2024 conflict against Russia. God bless america.

• 
  @TigOriMish4 ай бұрын

  No, they are not effective. Mines, artillery, drones, missiles are effective, as well as reliable and strong relationships between different branches of the military. Without all of the above, any armored vehicle is a useless piece of scrap metal, especially Bradley, an overpriced piece of scrap metal.

• 
  @miswojtek61014 ай бұрын

  ​@@TigOriMishthat's funny how you just f**ked up whole your sane point with just one word. When you got to "overpriced" - that was kinda clear that you find vatnik more protective than kevlar.

• 
  @TigOriMish4 ай бұрын

  @@miswojtek6101 in war, every penny is worth gold if you can produce a lot of equipment for cheap, but with slightly lower quality, then this is great, if not good. The problem with expensive equipment is that its losses are very difficult to make up for; during World War 2, the Germans produced excellent equipment, but it was very expensive to produce and maintain, and because of this they lost.

• 
  @miswojtek61014 ай бұрын

  @@TigOriMish nope, mate, don't make it even worse. You were so cool in the beginning and now just drown yourself with that "finest german equipment". Truth is things cost as they cost. It's impossible to make a good piece, which will be also cheap - if we're still talking about war machinery. I'd be amused if I've been proved wrong - so please, go on and try with example.

• 
  @TigOriMish4 ай бұрын

  @@miswojtek6101 You know, I really love the German Tiger tanks, but at the same time I hate the disgusting transmission on this tank, because of this these tanks were not able to overcome many kilometers of marches. The Germans, instead of producing cheap equipment, created expensive Tigers, Panthers, as well as the Tiger 2 and Mouse tanks. For you to understand the Tiger 2 and Mouse tanks, they devoured all the metal of the Reich....

• 
  @Stadtpark904 ай бұрын

  Now that aged well.

• 
  @bossdog14804 ай бұрын

  There's an old saying; "Too many cooks spoil the broth."

• 
  @efosaodiase5014 ай бұрын

  I have not laughed this hard in a long time.

• 
  @MrAnt-sf2sk4 ай бұрын

  5:07 does this make any sense? I don’t think it matters weather you’re a tank or not. Your enemy will attack you regardless.

• 
  @watwat25404 ай бұрын

  yea but how intense will the firepower be? if they just saw a light apc they probaly wouldn't fire everything they have at it but with this design it becomes more than a light apc nearly a small tank so it will be targeted more with more firepower

• 
  @BenersantheBread2 ай бұрын

  @@watwat2540 It's not an APC

• 
  @cherryscarlett4 ай бұрын

  _l)Ə _*_B£øπl)AĞ∅π. ._*

• 
  @bryanos1184 ай бұрын

  The revisionist in me now sees the generals as the good guys who just want to make an awesome fighting vehicle, and the other guy is a conformist who revels in mediocrity.

• 
  @balancingact83554 ай бұрын

  Without Bob we wouldn't have Bradleys taking out T90s.

• 
  @raymondyee20084 ай бұрын

  Hahaha well money well spent wasn’t it?

• 
  @culterwaleddy4 ай бұрын

  Me in 2023: Wow so true. Me in 2024: I always knew this movie was a lie.

• 
  @miswojtek61014 ай бұрын

  That's the best part of it. The movie perfectly shows how any production is going on. Althought it's absolute fiction in the case of Bradley.

• 
  @enotred26364 ай бұрын

  Just watched the Bradley Knock out a T-90. "The General says add more ammo"

• 
  @raymondyee20084 ай бұрын

  The irony indeed from this scene in the movie.

• 
  @wsbchk_4 ай бұрын

  Didn't knock it out. Ukraine propaganda.

• 
  @Stadtpark904 ай бұрын

  @@wsbchk_well: its turret spun out of control, they panicked and drove it against a big tree, and the crew left, as they didn’t want to wait for the finishing drone strike, artillery strike or whatever they assumed to be next… It’s not knocked out, but it’s abandoned and useless in it’s current state and location.

• 
  @Iberny33 ай бұрын

  @@Stadtpark9025mm must have damaged hydraulics somehow. Definitely a tank russia wants to recover and inspect it so it doesn’t happen again.

• 
  @jordanwhite3523 ай бұрын

  It didn't knock it out, but that's the M3 Bradley which is the improvement on the design and as closer to its original concept, not the M2 monstrosity that's featured here.

• 
  @Buttnubs4 ай бұрын

  Came here as soon as I heard that two Bradleys just defeated a T-90M using only it’s 25mm guns

• 
  @AwkwardYet4 ай бұрын

  This aged so well 🤣

• 
  @24pavlo4 ай бұрын

  Yeah, Bradley is a really good machine. And Col. Burton is a liar.

• 
  @alexestevez82664 ай бұрын

  Same here

• 
  @raymondyee20084 ай бұрын

  Not bad for a “quasi tank that has less armor than a snowblower (but) got enough ammo to take out half of DC”.

• 
  @levikazama23234 ай бұрын

  this man who made this book lied the bradly was under budget and was always meant to be what it was an all rounder. ​@@raymondyee2008

• 
  @viliussmproductions4 ай бұрын

  I want to say "in hindisght, what a clueless movie this is", but the Bradley had more tank kills than the Abrams even back in Desert Storm, so there's really no excuses

• 
  @Booze_Rooster7 күн бұрын

  While facing knockdown T-55s and T-72s manned by badly trained crews in fixed positions with only surprise and better optics to their advantage.

• 
  @viliussmproductions7 күн бұрын

  @@Booze_Rooster Exactly. Top of the line combloc tanks at the time.

• 
  @Booze_Rooster7 күн бұрын

  @@viliussmproductions not knockdown kit versions and Lion of Babylons. I think you missed my point

• 
  @jimothyjameson63114 ай бұрын

  And yet the last laugh goes to the committee who designed it - it's the best AFV in Ukraine.

• 
  @raymondyee20084 ай бұрын

  Some “big taxi cab” actually humiliated a tank.

• 
  @Quadrenaro4 ай бұрын

  T-90 is kill

• 
  @The_Mess854 ай бұрын

  And despite all it's problems and it's jank and cost blowouts, the war in Ukraine has shown just how damn effective the Bradley's are. It's fucking ironic as hell how this has turned out. Especially since the current 25mm autocannon can take out a T-90 with just the cannon and some smart tactics lawl. It's even funnier given the army hasn't found a replacement for it despite 3 decades of trying to.

• 
  @spartand0014 ай бұрын

  aged like milk

• 
  @Bruh-td7ex4 ай бұрын

  I mean the real Burton who is part of the reformers wants to discredit the bradley. Also note the bradley has more armor kills in ODS than the m1 abrams

• 
  @samovarmaker96734 ай бұрын

  Hits a little different now that it took down a T-90M

• 
  @prodigalfraudaddy-es1gl23 күн бұрын

  Propoganda

• 
  @cosmicfarer22 күн бұрын

  That T-90 was ambushed. His tower was broken and he could not answer. Two Bradleys fired from both sides. There was no harm to the tank from their fire. And the Kontakt dynamic protection units exploded. The guys calmly drove away from the fire, but because of the broken rotating turret they crashed into a tree. They calmly left the car. The tank remained there. Whole. You can search for photos and videos. In Ukraine, Bradleys are burned in batches every day. The film is completely true. This is an easy target. It's bad to be a thoughtless victim of propaganda.

• 
  @Alte.Kameraden4 ай бұрын

  Gotta say this film didn't age well. Bradley has proven to be one of the best vehicles on the battlefield throughout the 1980/90/2000s. Similar to the people who say Grr F-22 is terrible, or Grr F-35 is a waste of money. Honestly starting to wonder if these people are paid to spread misinformation around to get weapon projects cancelled. ie agents of America's enemies.

• 
  @SeanP71954 ай бұрын

  I’m not sure. But people who say things like that get paid handsomely to talk in media outlets all over the world. They spoke of the F-15 Eagle in similar terms and it became the greatest fighter jet of all time.

• 
  @anthonynehoda20644 ай бұрын

  in most cases they are just useful idiots

• 
  @T9193494 ай бұрын

  Pierre Sprey appeared a lot on r*ssia today spreading misinformation about the F-35. Connections to r*ssian state media are purely coincidental....

• 
  @ChucksSEADnDEAD4 ай бұрын

  Here after it knocked out a T-90M in Ukraine.

• 
  @Alte.Kameraden4 ай бұрын

  Same.

• 
  @someone4964 ай бұрын

  Bradley in Ukraine killed a t90