ahaha=)) if two cars collides at 64km/h each it doesn't sum up to 128km/h=)))) learn basic physics, China professionals... but so glamour....
@ukup12312 сағат бұрын
都是主观评测，带有春秋笔法先抑后扬，如果小米和智己的牌子互换一下，l6要被吹爆。
@yindu_Weige88815 сағат бұрын
❤❤❤
@mikapeltokorpi7671Күн бұрын
That poison gas venting to Model Y cabin is no good. And you could see that passenger whiplash was not survivable. But it is good to know that the low tire pressure alarm was working.
@kandianyingКүн бұрын
👍👍👍
@iohengwong3602Күн бұрын
長城哈弗大狗追獵版？
@andywoo8554Күн бұрын
啊！啊！五环
@user-pv1hp5qn4cКүн бұрын
黑加油站，趕緊報警！
@victor.nexus72 күн бұрын
你们这种带有堵车情况的驾驶比较，不能体现出真正的续航。 差评
@user-pk6mq1er2q3 күн бұрын
卡罗拉双擎多少？秦多少钱？
@cat2.95703 күн бұрын
今年必须要搞一趟，666
@SunShineAlwaysEveryday3 күн бұрын
非常好的内容，真實，客觀，直接。VOLVO XC60 真是台好車❤
@SunShineAlwaysEveryday3 күн бұрын
很難得的實車測試，彌足珍貴。讚❤
@biaohan43584 күн бұрын
I am guessing this Tesla is a RWD version? If so we can expect it not to catch fire during a front collision as there's almost no HV parts in the front crump zone. However the result could be different if it's an AWD version with HV wires and motor at front. This type of textbook collision test would not be a problem to most Teslas or EVs. However some non-textbook accidents could be quite fatal. For example a road hazard that can deform the battery from bottom, or a T-bone collison. With today's Autopilot and collision prevention technologies front end collison is happening less and less often. Tests on EV fire safety should focus more on those type of non-textbook accidents. A little more explanation: Test designers should focus more on the nature of the vehicles. They are quite different. As an example on ICE cars it's very easy to increase range however not easy to increase power, so traditionally power is a top measure of an ICE car. However on EVs it's just the opposite -- it's very easy for EVs to increase power however quite difficult to increase range. So on EVs range becomes a top metric. Similarly on safety tests EVs with flat battery at bottom would perform completely different than ICE cars with engine in the front. This should be taken into consideration when designing the tests.
@TripleJuen4 күн бұрын
Hahahha how they shade Audi. Lol so obvious
@leeaoslife90664 күн бұрын
吉利就是中国版大众也开始玩套娃三兄弟了😂
@leeaoslife90664 күн бұрын
敢问这位主播是台湾人吗😂
@yindu_Weige8884 күн бұрын
感谢分享！❤❤
@SuperMrgentleman4 күн бұрын
Should have run an XC90
@haydnzhu26635 күн бұрын
維護費，維修費怎麼比較啊⋯⋯？😂
@jdiazsilva50405 күн бұрын
Great video boys thanks for sharing my best regards 🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙
@130319836 күн бұрын
这口音。。。。看不下去了。
@shadowsocks56 күн бұрын
低频共振
@yindu_Weige8887 күн бұрын
💜💜
@Volta247 күн бұрын
Great. You are best👏👏💪. Love from Romania. 👏👏👏
@yindu_Weige8887 күн бұрын
❤❤❤
@machinevisionledlightingco71858 күн бұрын
开起来像开船，不知道为什么那么多人买。
@user-om2sl7dz1z9 күн бұрын
不錯.....這測試挺好.......
@uodian99389 күн бұрын
个人感觉充值了。可以直接搜小米 主动安全，就可以看更多的相关视频了
@jasonliu450110 күн бұрын
等着看虎克呢, 结果啥也没有.
@heruhg814810 күн бұрын
more cinematic than ncap 🗿
@chunress423810 күн бұрын
你可能说错了，遇到路牌时会自动把亮度变暗，以免反光造成驾驶员刺眼！
@adamkai82013111 күн бұрын
好身材
@afqt8011 күн бұрын
The Tesla dummies had better protection scores but the presenter argues the Tesla has some risk concerns..... Hmmm ok....
@user-pj7td1us5y9 күн бұрын
Где же лучшие задний пасажир шею сломал)))
@stach7911 күн бұрын
Fantastic video! You should try an "old/new" car crash. I don't know how an 2010 Volvo S80 (for example) will perform in situations like this Thanks again!!
@user-kk8zx8jo3m11 күн бұрын
我要3.0！
@invasion182411 күн бұрын
Both cars did really well. I own both, but the X instead of Y.
@andreiderme12 күн бұрын
Fantastic video, guys! Very very informative! Insane amout of work! Ps: Volvo for life
@cliffburtonnkardesiyim372512 күн бұрын
Volvo fanboys trying to hold their breath
@manlaw6912 күн бұрын
霸王龍內外都做得好靚
@kdcnnn112 күн бұрын
广汽AION 在很多城市满大街
@yindu_Weige88812 күн бұрын
✌️✌️💜
@vinceender701012 күн бұрын
都不是一个档次的品牌
@a.rodriguez126412 күн бұрын
Great video! thanks God for the air bags….and the closed captions. 😊
@andreiderme12 күн бұрын
Man they talk fast!
@VesmarTejttinen9 күн бұрын
@@andreidermeI changed the speed of video to 1/2, so I could easily read the subtitles.
@marinoint13 күн бұрын
這價位在中國有很多其它更好的選擇。不大幅降價的話銷售量會很慘...
@makeyoursoul13 күн бұрын
在我們台灣肯定超過百萬
@haotianjiang191913 күн бұрын
A柱画面一直在抖动呀
@Dark_Vader88814 күн бұрын
TESLA best ........Volvo is Sh#t
@juanbc216412 күн бұрын
tesla is shit
@eugh695616 күн бұрын
Good show 👍
@tiefutu16 күн бұрын
既检验消费者智商，也检验车评人底线
@sackboy568316 күн бұрын
The production value of this series is insane. However the relative speed is not 128kmh as started in this video at 4:01. Mythbusters already corrected and proven this in a special episode.
Пікірлер
不好看啊
ahaha=)) if two cars collides at 64km/h each it doesn't sum up to 128km/h=)))) learn basic physics, China professionals... but so glamour....
都是主观评测，带有春秋笔法先抑后扬，如果小米和智己的牌子互换一下，l6要被吹爆。
❤❤❤
That poison gas venting to Model Y cabin is no good. And you could see that passenger whiplash was not survivable. But it is good to know that the low tire pressure alarm was working.
👍👍👍
長城哈弗大狗追獵版？
啊！啊！五环
黑加油站，趕緊報警！
你们这种带有堵车情况的驾驶比较，不能体现出真正的续航。 差评
卡罗拉双擎多少？秦多少钱？
今年必须要搞一趟，666
非常好的内容，真實，客觀，直接。VOLVO XC60 真是台好車❤
很難得的實車測試，彌足珍貴。讚❤
I am guessing this Tesla is a RWD version? If so we can expect it not to catch fire during a front collision as there's almost no HV parts in the front crump zone. However the result could be different if it's an AWD version with HV wires and motor at front. This type of textbook collision test would not be a problem to most Teslas or EVs. However some non-textbook accidents could be quite fatal. For example a road hazard that can deform the battery from bottom, or a T-bone collison. With today's Autopilot and collision prevention technologies front end collison is happening less and less often. Tests on EV fire safety should focus more on those type of non-textbook accidents. A little more explanation: Test designers should focus more on the nature of the vehicles. They are quite different. As an example on ICE cars it's very easy to increase range however not easy to increase power, so traditionally power is a top measure of an ICE car. However on EVs it's just the opposite -- it's very easy for EVs to increase power however quite difficult to increase range. So on EVs range becomes a top metric. Similarly on safety tests EVs with flat battery at bottom would perform completely different than ICE cars with engine in the front. This should be taken into consideration when designing the tests.
Hahahha how they shade Audi. Lol so obvious
吉利就是中国版大众也开始玩套娃三兄弟了😂
敢问这位主播是台湾人吗😂
感谢分享！❤❤
Should have run an XC90
維護費，維修費怎麼比較啊⋯⋯？😂
Great video boys thanks for sharing my best regards 🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙
这口音。。。。看不下去了。
低频共振
💜💜
Great. You are best👏👏💪. Love from Romania. 👏👏👏
❤❤❤
开起来像开船，不知道为什么那么多人买。
不錯.....這測試挺好.......
个人感觉充值了。可以直接搜小米 主动安全，就可以看更多的相关视频了
等着看虎克呢, 结果啥也没有.
more cinematic than ncap 🗿
你可能说错了，遇到路牌时会自动把亮度变暗，以免反光造成驾驶员刺眼！
好身材
The Tesla dummies had better protection scores but the presenter argues the Tesla has some risk concerns..... Hmmm ok....
Где же лучшие задний пасажир шею сломал)))
Fantastic video! You should try an "old/new" car crash. I don't know how an 2010 Volvo S80 (for example) will perform in situations like this Thanks again!!
我要3.0！
Both cars did really well. I own both, but the X instead of Y.
Fantastic video, guys! Very very informative! Insane amout of work! Ps: Volvo for life
Volvo fanboys trying to hold their breath
霸王龍內外都做得好靚
广汽AION 在很多城市满大街
✌️✌️💜
都不是一个档次的品牌
Great video! thanks God for the air bags….and the closed captions. 😊
Man they talk fast!
@@andreidermeI changed the speed of video to 1/2, so I could easily read the subtitles.
這價位在中國有很多其它更好的選擇。不大幅降價的話銷售量會很慘...
在我們台灣肯定超過百萬
A柱画面一直在抖动呀
TESLA best ........Volvo is Sh#t
tesla is shit
Good show 👍
既检验消费者智商，也检验车评人底线
The production value of this series is insane. However the relative speed is not 128kmh as started in this video at 4:01. Mythbusters already corrected and proven this in a special episode.