Heyo! I’m Sil and I love to make art. This channel is a way for me to share what I am making and also what I am up to in my daily life. Feel free to join the journey 🍓
Thinking this is progress is the issue. It is "regress". Most people are so deeply confused. They don't understand what gives them an actual sense of meaning in life. They're incredibly simplistic and believe that any and all increases in efficiency - "numbers go up, yay!" - is equivalent to a bettering of their life. It is not. Struggle is part of the human experience, it gives us a sense of purpose and makes us feel needed by others, and without it we wither. Someone who thinks life is about min-maxing everything like it's some simple video game will continue to make ignorant choices that are against their own self-interests until they grow wiser.
@alex_roivas3333 сағат бұрын
im from chicago, and those are the marina city towers. they are supposed to be side by side, so this is impossible geography (IRL). it DOES look ai generated to me, and not merely a messy composite of impossible things. if they were just compositing IRL buildings together, 1:31 this shot, wouldn't have that weird flat staircase. this is an IRL bridge house, and it looks very weird to me (who has seen the real thing)
@J.H.Martin9913 сағат бұрын
hi. loving your glasses.
@monkii525814 сағат бұрын
it's ex makina not masheena
@nachgeben14 сағат бұрын
Honestly, after a bunch of artists decided to tear down anyone using AI as the tool it is (an assistance tool no different than spellcheck or auto-(effect here in Photoshop), I stopped feeling sympathy for the artist plight against AI as a whole. All it did was prove that artists are so self-absorbed, they're generally not worth the effort to deal with. Example: Corridor going through all that effort to do a video, and using Stable Diffusion to just add the effects they would normally do by hand, and y'all lost your shit. It wasn't anything any of you guys were going to be hired for; they would've done it all themselves. Just instead of having to do it manually, they had Stable Diffusion help. Is it goofy for a studio to use AI art? Yes. Would I have cared like a year ago? Absolutely. Do I care now? No. You all showed you're incapable of thinking outside of yourselves, and actually focus on real problems with AI art, and you all lost support. A lot of us have gotten tired hearing about it, and it's validated all the accusations and stereotypes about artists, watching the black/white bitching that has happened from the artist community. It's no more intelligent than the ones who call themselves AI artists.
@hillehai33 минут бұрын
God, you're so wrong. AI is not a tool. You'd have to be a tool yourself to believe that. It's very clearly a replacement as there is no creative process. You sound like yet another person who won't put in the time to become competent at something and are angry at and envious of people who have done so. Artists aren't full of themselves, they just put in the hard work and effort that you refuse to invest.
@otgunz15 сағат бұрын
Look girl, GRAPHIC ARTIST'S 2 HOURS + PHOTO ON A STOCK PHOTO SITE = GRAPHIC ARTIST'S 5 MINUTES + AI. So there is NOTHING artistic about Photoshoping a poster with photos and effects. Same process, just simpler and easier.
@endjineerkurts6952Күн бұрын
Yeah that is the problem with automation on every level. Something that was originally marketed as something to save us time and drudgery so we could have more time to pursue our passions. Instead automation is used to stamp out human craftsmanship and creativity and leave us with only the work that's too onerous, dangerous, or painstaking for the machines to take on. Which leaves us exhausted, awash in a sea of meaningless running slip and unable to summon the energy for inspiration and passion.
@CronyxRavage2 күн бұрын
AI doesn't "steal" art anymore than humans do, when they use the same process. Human artists look at art of other humans, and that experience of observation is recorded in their memory (a copy is made of the art in their mind), and their imagination remixes the details of that experience with other experiences to produce something derivative. Replace "imagination" with "cache" and AI is doing the same thing. Engaging in special pleading that AI shouldn't be allowed to learn by experience is carbon based chauvinism. It's prejudice, there's no other word to describe it. All intelligence, no matter the computational substrate of their mind -- be that meat or metal -- has the right to experience the world around them and express themselves artistically from those experiences. That includes looking at art, and being inspired by it.
@Zazume_3 күн бұрын
I'm all for AI usage privately, for small content creators to realize stuff that would otherwise be way to expensive for their budget, or for non-commercial purposes. Big companies in industries like movies, series, videogames or music using AI just to reduce costs, even though they could easily afford hiring regular professionals, is the ultimate nightmare to me though. That's where jobs are truly in danger and that's not okay.
@SolarXPunk223 күн бұрын
Oh look at Humanity.. scrambling to prevent the inevitable. You don't fear AI you fear the continuation of money in a growing automated world. If we remove this outdated concept we call money AI stops being the problem and starts being the solution. Human creativity will never go away we can always pursue whatever goal we want it would be like Star Trek
@Kittenfox_556 күн бұрын
That crappy chip brand Popcorners used AI art for a Twitter ad make sure never to buy them.
@8bitninja648 күн бұрын
Sure, you can’t steal the work off the walls but you can certainly steal the style and replicate your own work based on it.
@chad48589 күн бұрын
I'm actually thankful for ai images being adopted for commercial purposes, at least from a consumer angle. It's a blatant red flag showing a lack of production value, care, and consideration went into the product. It allows you to much more easily judge a book by its cover - ai cover? It's probably low effort and not worth a second glance. Ai album art? Same thing. If you don't care about what you're making enough to get real work done for it, then your declaring for everyone to see it's just low effort slop not worth my time.
@octo504210 күн бұрын
liked and subscribed. my career is not art, but music. and i am struggling with this exact thing in my flute practice. as soon as summer hit and i got done with my first year of college, Im just really struggling to pick up my flute, and it feels like im staring up at a mountain of tasks in front of me. this has really helped me, its awesome how transferable the skills in an art career can be applied to music 😊
@Nick-ft4dk10 күн бұрын
It’s not alleged, they Are ai generated
@Zamalshkay11 күн бұрын
if u think AI is unethical ur just another switchboard operator who will be swept away by thin new era, just adapt
@EthanWombat13-om1en11 күн бұрын
I believe that most of those who complain about AI are people who don't understand what AI is. They think it's a "living" thinking entity acting unilaterally, and that sounds more like they've watched too many Hollywood movies and fantasies. The reality is that AI is a work tool. In the case of the posters you mentioned, for example, I don't think it's the "poster creators" who are creating them with AI, but rather the movie producers and marketers who, to save money on graphic design, prefer to do something default, whether it's with AI or not, but something default. In other words, no musician, for example, will use AI to make music; they will use AI to improve their music or ideas. The problem is that Hollywood and the music world, and some arts in general like graphic design, posters, and special effects, are done to make money, not for artists to express themselves freely. They invest in the movie and seek to make money with that investment. They put in the money and have the right to decide to use AI if they feel like it. Production companies are not charitable organizations; the creators of Spider-Man don't do it for the love of art, they do it to make money, and they will use whatever is necessary to make more money, cut costs, and eventually have more control over their processes. It's an industry, not a nonprofit organization.
@20000dino11 күн бұрын
5:41 Hey, non-binary people exist, thank you.
@rick.creates11 күн бұрын
Great video, I am currently struggling with going full time as artist but watching videos like these are very motivating Thank you!
@Silustrations11 күн бұрын
We are in the same boat then! We got this, just gotta stick to it :) thank you for watching and good luck with your journey
@silvokami11 күн бұрын
Best upload yet, learned so much <3
@TheDCbiz11 күн бұрын
Boo hoo. Creatives are upset their industries are being fully automated. Blue collar workers and factory workers warned of this for DECADES. But creatives laughed at us. Get an education. Learn to code. It makes life easier and cheaper. Soon the professional class will feel their whole industries grasping for life too and then it'll be complete. An ai generated film with ai positers with self checkout box office cashiers and ai ran distribution company. Our journey to ai and automation will be complete
@20000dino11 күн бұрын
You really think you said something lmfao.
@TheDCbiz11 күн бұрын
@@20000dino i only spoke truth. Welcome to the new ai revolution
@InsidiousClouds12 күн бұрын
This is really helpful, I've struggled with making art for so long. Thank you!
@Silustrations12 күн бұрын
So glad to hear! Thank you for watching c:
@radicalpaprika172012 күн бұрын
unrelated but I love your voice, I feel like I gotta listen to your advice now
@Silustrations12 күн бұрын
Ahaha thanks I guess? As long as you take the advice :D
@razzerkatana12 күн бұрын
Good video Silvia! keep working!
@Silustrations12 күн бұрын
Thank you mr Ras with a Z
@Beardqt12 күн бұрын
distractions will always ruin the creative flow😅
@user-uc8hq3yd8f12 күн бұрын
Started watching the video but got distracted and started cleaning my desk. Now I am moving homes because I need a clean space. What were you talking about again?
@Silustrations12 күн бұрын
Seems my plan worked very well 🤔
@Mooooty13 күн бұрын
Adapt...Evolve...or...Go Extinct!
@jensjosefsen490317 күн бұрын
But why is it up to u to decide whether People Can enjoy ai art… personale i enjoy drawing a lot but ai art Can do things People are unable to do. So why not let People combine the two elements…
@Silustrations17 күн бұрын
Did you miss the part of the video where I explained why I am against it? The whole video explains why….
@AlisinaFakhraei-ss3pr18 күн бұрын
Did they use Midjourney? cause I could not create a photo realistic image like the posters with Dall-E
@KhanumBallZ18 күн бұрын
Thanks. Now I like A24 even more. Intellectual property is fascism. Viva la open source
@Jasonart.119 күн бұрын
I am a beginner artist. Spent 7 weeks sketching everyday and saw small improvements. Took a week off and found it so hard and frustrating to get back to it, as if I was starting again from scratch. So much easier when I just do it everyday. Thanks again for the inspiration. Keep up the good work.
@Silustrations19 күн бұрын
I know that feeling all too well, even though I have been drawing for a few years now, hang in there! Glad to hear I inspired you and thanks for the lovely comment :) means a lot
@faustorafaelgenaoarias917120 күн бұрын
I think AI is inevitable, like was typing machines, then computers (a lot of jobs were dismissed because of it) you have horses changed by cars, and cars by electric cars, and so on. So many invents that change professions for good. Change is inevitable. I think the mindset should be, let’s learn and adapt, and use AI in our favours.
@Jasonart.121 күн бұрын
Shocking that Apple would do this, especially after all the strikes last year, and the destruction it caused. Keep up the good work!
@RM-xr8lq21 күн бұрын
scary to think people in these broken capitalist nations are attacking the usage of mathematics and statistical learning. artists should not be technophobes or bootlickers to copyright, seems that for-profit social media has corrupted them into thinking the only motivation to do human art is getting paid/ad money. wait until these privileged westerners realize some people enjoy art outside the labor they provide to help society (which already does not describe most western labor, which is instead meant to help an owner or shareholder), and that they enjoy people taking inspiration from them. where attribution is simply given to people to know where inspiration is from, rather than used to gate who has access to certain ideas or designs. where AI is seen as another tool and medium rather than a threat... at least people in high ranked western universities are starting to protest the actual problems in their society, rather than worry about getting a job at greedy tech companies and hollywood or advocating for even less access rights to human data and knowledge than they had already
@SylvesterLazarus22 күн бұрын
I've been an exclusively digital artist since 2016 and I picked up traditional drawing partially because of AI about a year ago and I'm better at both than ever before. Just giving the credit where credit is due...
@stillbuyvhs22 күн бұрын
What Hollywood execs don't realize: if & when AI gets good enough, their customers will no longer need them. A viewer will be able to type what he or she wants to see into a computer, & the computer will be able to generate a movie suited to that viewer's tastes right then & there. This isn't a new idea; it's been a concept in sci-fi for decades. Atari was working on such a system in the early '80's; they hoped it could create interactive stories for games. But the tech wasn't really ready till today; AI kinda plateaued for a bit in the early '90's It's still possible the tech will plateau again, as it did in the early '90's. If it does, it could become a useful tool, allowing smaller artists to create without huge Hollywood budgets. But if it doesn't... If it doesn't this will be like radio vs. TV. Worse. Art will always exist, but it may not have a commercial future. If AI continues to advance there will be high art in galleries, folk art made by people who want to express themselves, but little or no commercial art or entertainment art. I don't think there's anything we can do about this; even if someone makes some law, not all countries will enact similar laws, & the internet will allow consumers to search out & find a site or program that can create whatever they want to see.
@ExOccultis24 күн бұрын
Generativ A.I. is just theft in my opinion. Calling it art does dilute the meaning of art. Till we manage to find a way to integrate this technology useful into our society with clear rules and without harm i m avocating for not using it.
@jibxjib24 күн бұрын
we all to oil our joints sometimes
@Silustrations24 күн бұрын
here's to oiled joints *drinks a shot of olive oil*
@royalyugoslavrecords893925 күн бұрын
As a musician it terrifies me. Everything on the charts in 5 years will be ai generated.
@koenignero25 күн бұрын
I dont know why but YT showed me 5-6 impressions for Shorts and videos from you in the past 24 hours. YT wants be to watch you :)
@Silustrations25 күн бұрын
I hope that’s not a complaint :D and thank you for letting me know, I’m glad KZread is working in my favor!
@koenignero24 күн бұрын
@@SilustrationsI have subscribed :)
@Infinite_Repeat26 күн бұрын
In a movie about journalism and photography very weird for A24 to use ai art for their marketing
@pyanek27 күн бұрын
Hi Sil, I don't mean to be harsh, but I feel there are so many disputable things here... Those Civil War posters could've been made by a location scout, photographer, concept artist, illustrator and they would've still been just as misleading. AI has nothing to do with it, it's the WAY they used AI that's the problem. Only people and their creative decisions made those posters publicly available. It's not like A24 and Alex Garland etc are AI themselves! AI is just a tool they used, and in this case you mentioned they used it misleadingly. Then, "a bunch of heads staring into space" has been a common practice in movie poster design for decades. It's definitely a human issue, not an AI issue. There's a documentary called '24x36' that if I remember correctly talks about this (and it was made before text to image generation existed). The art of poster making is ruled by human decisions, no matter how much AI is involved in the process. Also, the humanness that AI lacks is because AI is still just a baby! Give it a few years (or months at this rate) and it'll grow to understand nuances and emotions even more. But I don't mean to replace people, but to be a better tool for people. I understand the perspective that AI used in creative things will for sure be used to replace some people, but also, for sure there are creative people who use it as a new creative limb, an AI extension so to speak. Human creativity is ever-expanding. Those replaced will be those replaceable. If anything AI forces creatives to become even MORE creative and original. You say 'don't show your support to these production companies', but are you aware of what you're actually promoting? The movies themselves are the passion projects of PEOPLE, and their existence is due to people's decisions. Again, they might USE AI for something, but the movies themselves are 99% human-based. I feel this is extremely obvious by just watching the movies... And saying that they are 'attempting to take away the beauty of art' would be a very hurtful thing to them, you're basically trashing on their hard work for no reason other than the fact that the marketing team used AI. I mean, have you even seen Civil War for example? Does that seem like an AI generated movie to you? Also, side note, I consider myself a cinephile and I don't have nor want any movie posters at home. As far as I'm concerned that's just a stereotype ;)
@NicolasSequeira27 күн бұрын
I guess I'll just stop watching A24 productions from now on. Thanks for spilling the beans!
@ExUSSailor27 күн бұрын
I got news for you, art's been dead in Hollywood for years now, and, AI wasn't the reason. Corporate greed was.
@millthor22 күн бұрын
I agree
@ralboraggins956427 күн бұрын
unfortunately your views expressed here will probably be censored in part by AI
@josketcha27 күн бұрын
Hollywood is failing. Big Studios will lose tons of money. Indie Studios are taking over.
@osooso602728 күн бұрын
if you use AI to create "art" you are no longer human and can never call yourself an artist. Even if it wasn't blatantly stealing have some integrity.
@Invictus_Mithra28 күн бұрын
The example you gave with the art gallery doesn't really work. In that case you're stealing a physical item of which there is only one original in the world. That doesn't really work in the digital space unless you want to get into the nft can of worms and even then the image is still able to be copied
@avisheksingh55828 күн бұрын
Well u just explained why we should make piracy legal...
@Invictus_Mithra28 күн бұрын
@@avisheksingh558 what I explained is that copying a JPEG is completely different than taking a piece of art from a gallery
@avisheksingh55828 күн бұрын
@@Invictus_MithraI get what u mean...but the point being made was about unethically and illegally acquiring content... So the example of the art gallery might not be accurate in some other context but it does work in this context..
@Invictus_Mithra28 күн бұрын
@@avisheksingh558 The point was just because it's public does not mean you can steal it and then she mentioned the public art gallery but like I'm saying this isn't stealing
@koenignero28 күн бұрын
A24s downfall began with Apple
@thedumbstuff417027 күн бұрын
Apple bought A24?
@koenignero27 күн бұрын
@@thedumbstuff4170no Apple made a huge multiyear deal with A24 to produce exclusive content for Apple TV
@b.d664229 күн бұрын
As an artist it honestly baffles me that people don't get the points you're making, or worst, understand but still try to defend it knowing full well that it's harming people
@_angstlust_28 күн бұрын
This development cannot be stopped. It's pointless to defend it or to codemn it - in the future a lot of aspects we thought are genuine human territory will move to AI.
@Silustrations28 күн бұрын
@@_angstlust_with this mindset of “accepting our fate”, for sure
@Silustrations28 күн бұрын
Thank you for the support. Almost every comment that is challenging my point of view missed the most important parts of the video - that my main issue with AI is that in its current state it is art theft. And that it lacks humanity. Majority of arguments vouching for AI seem to completely ignore these arguments for some reason.
@artorhen28 күн бұрын
@_angstlust_ ok and? You still haven't made any point at all.
@ryjoho200227 күн бұрын
@artorhen The only comment _angstlust_ posted makes a very clear point. You're complaints about all this will have exactly 0 effect on AI and how it is trained and used. Google scale companies don't care about your opinion, privacy or values and you have no influence over them.
Пікірлер
Thinking this is progress is the issue. It is "regress". Most people are so deeply confused. They don't understand what gives them an actual sense of meaning in life. They're incredibly simplistic and believe that any and all increases in efficiency - "numbers go up, yay!" - is equivalent to a bettering of their life. It is not. Struggle is part of the human experience, it gives us a sense of purpose and makes us feel needed by others, and without it we wither. Someone who thinks life is about min-maxing everything like it's some simple video game will continue to make ignorant choices that are against their own self-interests until they grow wiser.
im from chicago, and those are the marina city towers. they are supposed to be side by side, so this is impossible geography (IRL). it DOES look ai generated to me, and not merely a messy composite of impossible things. if they were just compositing IRL buildings together, 1:31 this shot, wouldn't have that weird flat staircase. this is an IRL bridge house, and it looks very weird to me (who has seen the real thing)
hi. loving your glasses.
it's ex makina not masheena
Honestly, after a bunch of artists decided to tear down anyone using AI as the tool it is (an assistance tool no different than spellcheck or auto-(effect here in Photoshop), I stopped feeling sympathy for the artist plight against AI as a whole. All it did was prove that artists are so self-absorbed, they're generally not worth the effort to deal with. Example: Corridor going through all that effort to do a video, and using Stable Diffusion to just add the effects they would normally do by hand, and y'all lost your shit. It wasn't anything any of you guys were going to be hired for; they would've done it all themselves. Just instead of having to do it manually, they had Stable Diffusion help. Is it goofy for a studio to use AI art? Yes. Would I have cared like a year ago? Absolutely. Do I care now? No. You all showed you're incapable of thinking outside of yourselves, and actually focus on real problems with AI art, and you all lost support. A lot of us have gotten tired hearing about it, and it's validated all the accusations and stereotypes about artists, watching the black/white bitching that has happened from the artist community. It's no more intelligent than the ones who call themselves AI artists.
God, you're so wrong. AI is not a tool. You'd have to be a tool yourself to believe that. It's very clearly a replacement as there is no creative process. You sound like yet another person who won't put in the time to become competent at something and are angry at and envious of people who have done so. Artists aren't full of themselves, they just put in the hard work and effort that you refuse to invest.
Look girl, GRAPHIC ARTIST'S 2 HOURS + PHOTO ON A STOCK PHOTO SITE = GRAPHIC ARTIST'S 5 MINUTES + AI. So there is NOTHING artistic about Photoshoping a poster with photos and effects. Same process, just simpler and easier.
Yeah that is the problem with automation on every level. Something that was originally marketed as something to save us time and drudgery so we could have more time to pursue our passions. Instead automation is used to stamp out human craftsmanship and creativity and leave us with only the work that's too onerous, dangerous, or painstaking for the machines to take on. Which leaves us exhausted, awash in a sea of meaningless running slip and unable to summon the energy for inspiration and passion.
AI doesn't "steal" art anymore than humans do, when they use the same process. Human artists look at art of other humans, and that experience of observation is recorded in their memory (a copy is made of the art in their mind), and their imagination remixes the details of that experience with other experiences to produce something derivative. Replace "imagination" with "cache" and AI is doing the same thing. Engaging in special pleading that AI shouldn't be allowed to learn by experience is carbon based chauvinism. It's prejudice, there's no other word to describe it. All intelligence, no matter the computational substrate of their mind -- be that meat or metal -- has the right to experience the world around them and express themselves artistically from those experiences. That includes looking at art, and being inspired by it.
I'm all for AI usage privately, for small content creators to realize stuff that would otherwise be way to expensive for their budget, or for non-commercial purposes. Big companies in industries like movies, series, videogames or music using AI just to reduce costs, even though they could easily afford hiring regular professionals, is the ultimate nightmare to me though. That's where jobs are truly in danger and that's not okay.
Oh look at Humanity.. scrambling to prevent the inevitable. You don't fear AI you fear the continuation of money in a growing automated world. If we remove this outdated concept we call money AI stops being the problem and starts being the solution. Human creativity will never go away we can always pursue whatever goal we want it would be like Star Trek
That crappy chip brand Popcorners used AI art for a Twitter ad make sure never to buy them.
Sure, you can’t steal the work off the walls but you can certainly steal the style and replicate your own work based on it.
I'm actually thankful for ai images being adopted for commercial purposes, at least from a consumer angle. It's a blatant red flag showing a lack of production value, care, and consideration went into the product. It allows you to much more easily judge a book by its cover - ai cover? It's probably low effort and not worth a second glance. Ai album art? Same thing. If you don't care about what you're making enough to get real work done for it, then your declaring for everyone to see it's just low effort slop not worth my time.
liked and subscribed. my career is not art, but music. and i am struggling with this exact thing in my flute practice. as soon as summer hit and i got done with my first year of college, Im just really struggling to pick up my flute, and it feels like im staring up at a mountain of tasks in front of me. this has really helped me, its awesome how transferable the skills in an art career can be applied to music 😊
It’s not alleged, they Are ai generated
if u think AI is unethical ur just another switchboard operator who will be swept away by thin new era, just adapt
I believe that most of those who complain about AI are people who don't understand what AI is. They think it's a "living" thinking entity acting unilaterally, and that sounds more like they've watched too many Hollywood movies and fantasies. The reality is that AI is a work tool. In the case of the posters you mentioned, for example, I don't think it's the "poster creators" who are creating them with AI, but rather the movie producers and marketers who, to save money on graphic design, prefer to do something default, whether it's with AI or not, but something default. In other words, no musician, for example, will use AI to make music; they will use AI to improve their music or ideas. The problem is that Hollywood and the music world, and some arts in general like graphic design, posters, and special effects, are done to make money, not for artists to express themselves freely. They invest in the movie and seek to make money with that investment. They put in the money and have the right to decide to use AI if they feel like it. Production companies are not charitable organizations; the creators of Spider-Man don't do it for the love of art, they do it to make money, and they will use whatever is necessary to make more money, cut costs, and eventually have more control over their processes. It's an industry, not a nonprofit organization.
5:41 Hey, non-binary people exist, thank you.
Great video, I am currently struggling with going full time as artist but watching videos like these are very motivating Thank you!
We are in the same boat then! We got this, just gotta stick to it :) thank you for watching and good luck with your journey
Best upload yet, learned so much <3
Boo hoo. Creatives are upset their industries are being fully automated. Blue collar workers and factory workers warned of this for DECADES. But creatives laughed at us. Get an education. Learn to code. It makes life easier and cheaper. Soon the professional class will feel their whole industries grasping for life too and then it'll be complete. An ai generated film with ai positers with self checkout box office cashiers and ai ran distribution company. Our journey to ai and automation will be complete
You really think you said something lmfao.
@@20000dino i only spoke truth. Welcome to the new ai revolution
This is really helpful, I've struggled with making art for so long. Thank you!
So glad to hear! Thank you for watching c:
unrelated but I love your voice, I feel like I gotta listen to your advice now
Ahaha thanks I guess? As long as you take the advice :D
Good video Silvia! keep working!
Thank you mr Ras with a Z
distractions will always ruin the creative flow😅
Started watching the video but got distracted and started cleaning my desk. Now I am moving homes because I need a clean space. What were you talking about again?
Seems my plan worked very well 🤔
Adapt...Evolve...or...Go Extinct!
But why is it up to u to decide whether People Can enjoy ai art… personale i enjoy drawing a lot but ai art Can do things People are unable to do. So why not let People combine the two elements…
Did you miss the part of the video where I explained why I am against it? The whole video explains why….
Did they use Midjourney? cause I could not create a photo realistic image like the posters with Dall-E
Thanks. Now I like A24 even more. Intellectual property is fascism. Viva la open source
I am a beginner artist. Spent 7 weeks sketching everyday and saw small improvements. Took a week off and found it so hard and frustrating to get back to it, as if I was starting again from scratch. So much easier when I just do it everyday. Thanks again for the inspiration. Keep up the good work.
I know that feeling all too well, even though I have been drawing for a few years now, hang in there! Glad to hear I inspired you and thanks for the lovely comment :) means a lot
I think AI is inevitable, like was typing machines, then computers (a lot of jobs were dismissed because of it) you have horses changed by cars, and cars by electric cars, and so on. So many invents that change professions for good. Change is inevitable. I think the mindset should be, let’s learn and adapt, and use AI in our favours.
Shocking that Apple would do this, especially after all the strikes last year, and the destruction it caused. Keep up the good work!
scary to think people in these broken capitalist nations are attacking the usage of mathematics and statistical learning. artists should not be technophobes or bootlickers to copyright, seems that for-profit social media has corrupted them into thinking the only motivation to do human art is getting paid/ad money. wait until these privileged westerners realize some people enjoy art outside the labor they provide to help society (which already does not describe most western labor, which is instead meant to help an owner or shareholder), and that they enjoy people taking inspiration from them. where attribution is simply given to people to know where inspiration is from, rather than used to gate who has access to certain ideas or designs. where AI is seen as another tool and medium rather than a threat... at least people in high ranked western universities are starting to protest the actual problems in their society, rather than worry about getting a job at greedy tech companies and hollywood or advocating for even less access rights to human data and knowledge than they had already
I've been an exclusively digital artist since 2016 and I picked up traditional drawing partially because of AI about a year ago and I'm better at both than ever before. Just giving the credit where credit is due...
What Hollywood execs don't realize: if & when AI gets good enough, their customers will no longer need them. A viewer will be able to type what he or she wants to see into a computer, & the computer will be able to generate a movie suited to that viewer's tastes right then & there. This isn't a new idea; it's been a concept in sci-fi for decades. Atari was working on such a system in the early '80's; they hoped it could create interactive stories for games. But the tech wasn't really ready till today; AI kinda plateaued for a bit in the early '90's It's still possible the tech will plateau again, as it did in the early '90's. If it does, it could become a useful tool, allowing smaller artists to create without huge Hollywood budgets. But if it doesn't... If it doesn't this will be like radio vs. TV. Worse. Art will always exist, but it may not have a commercial future. If AI continues to advance there will be high art in galleries, folk art made by people who want to express themselves, but little or no commercial art or entertainment art. I don't think there's anything we can do about this; even if someone makes some law, not all countries will enact similar laws, & the internet will allow consumers to search out & find a site or program that can create whatever they want to see.
Generativ A.I. is just theft in my opinion. Calling it art does dilute the meaning of art. Till we manage to find a way to integrate this technology useful into our society with clear rules and without harm i m avocating for not using it.
we all to oil our joints sometimes
here's to oiled joints *drinks a shot of olive oil*
As a musician it terrifies me. Everything on the charts in 5 years will be ai generated.
I dont know why but YT showed me 5-6 impressions for Shorts and videos from you in the past 24 hours. YT wants be to watch you :)
I hope that’s not a complaint :D and thank you for letting me know, I’m glad KZread is working in my favor!
@@SilustrationsI have subscribed :)
In a movie about journalism and photography very weird for A24 to use ai art for their marketing
Hi Sil, I don't mean to be harsh, but I feel there are so many disputable things here... Those Civil War posters could've been made by a location scout, photographer, concept artist, illustrator and they would've still been just as misleading. AI has nothing to do with it, it's the WAY they used AI that's the problem. Only people and their creative decisions made those posters publicly available. It's not like A24 and Alex Garland etc are AI themselves! AI is just a tool they used, and in this case you mentioned they used it misleadingly. Then, "a bunch of heads staring into space" has been a common practice in movie poster design for decades. It's definitely a human issue, not an AI issue. There's a documentary called '24x36' that if I remember correctly talks about this (and it was made before text to image generation existed). The art of poster making is ruled by human decisions, no matter how much AI is involved in the process. Also, the humanness that AI lacks is because AI is still just a baby! Give it a few years (or months at this rate) and it'll grow to understand nuances and emotions even more. But I don't mean to replace people, but to be a better tool for people. I understand the perspective that AI used in creative things will for sure be used to replace some people, but also, for sure there are creative people who use it as a new creative limb, an AI extension so to speak. Human creativity is ever-expanding. Those replaced will be those replaceable. If anything AI forces creatives to become even MORE creative and original. You say 'don't show your support to these production companies', but are you aware of what you're actually promoting? The movies themselves are the passion projects of PEOPLE, and their existence is due to people's decisions. Again, they might USE AI for something, but the movies themselves are 99% human-based. I feel this is extremely obvious by just watching the movies... And saying that they are 'attempting to take away the beauty of art' would be a very hurtful thing to them, you're basically trashing on their hard work for no reason other than the fact that the marketing team used AI. I mean, have you even seen Civil War for example? Does that seem like an AI generated movie to you? Also, side note, I consider myself a cinephile and I don't have nor want any movie posters at home. As far as I'm concerned that's just a stereotype ;)
I guess I'll just stop watching A24 productions from now on. Thanks for spilling the beans!
I got news for you, art's been dead in Hollywood for years now, and, AI wasn't the reason. Corporate greed was.
I agree
unfortunately your views expressed here will probably be censored in part by AI
Hollywood is failing. Big Studios will lose tons of money. Indie Studios are taking over.
if you use AI to create "art" you are no longer human and can never call yourself an artist. Even if it wasn't blatantly stealing have some integrity.
The example you gave with the art gallery doesn't really work. In that case you're stealing a physical item of which there is only one original in the world. That doesn't really work in the digital space unless you want to get into the nft can of worms and even then the image is still able to be copied
Well u just explained why we should make piracy legal...
@@avisheksingh558 what I explained is that copying a JPEG is completely different than taking a piece of art from a gallery
@@Invictus_MithraI get what u mean...but the point being made was about unethically and illegally acquiring content... So the example of the art gallery might not be accurate in some other context but it does work in this context..
@@avisheksingh558 The point was just because it's public does not mean you can steal it and then she mentioned the public art gallery but like I'm saying this isn't stealing
A24s downfall began with Apple
Apple bought A24?
@@thedumbstuff4170no Apple made a huge multiyear deal with A24 to produce exclusive content for Apple TV
As an artist it honestly baffles me that people don't get the points you're making, or worst, understand but still try to defend it knowing full well that it's harming people
This development cannot be stopped. It's pointless to defend it or to codemn it - in the future a lot of aspects we thought are genuine human territory will move to AI.
@@_angstlust_with this mindset of “accepting our fate”, for sure
Thank you for the support. Almost every comment that is challenging my point of view missed the most important parts of the video - that my main issue with AI is that in its current state it is art theft. And that it lacks humanity. Majority of arguments vouching for AI seem to completely ignore these arguments for some reason.
@_angstlust_ ok and? You still haven't made any point at all.
@artorhen The only comment _angstlust_ posted makes a very clear point. You're complaints about all this will have exactly 0 effect on AI and how it is trained and used. Google scale companies don't care about your opinion, privacy or values and you have no influence over them.