Пікірлер

• 
  @TheSymbiot3Venom2 сағат бұрын

  Thank you. I remember there being a hidden rule just didn’t remember

• 
  @ThatOneGDDasher10 күн бұрын

  W’bout BODMAS? Edit: BODMAS = Brackets, Order, Division, Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction

• 
  @jasondevera253924 күн бұрын

  Her tutorial is wrong, the correct answer is 1 Because there is no sign of multiplication in the given. in pemdas rule, The parenthesis is also a multiplication even without a sign of multiplication but you can't change or replace it in multiplication sign. if you want to know how the answer became 1, here's the correct solution below. 16÷4(3+1) 16÷4(4) 16÷16 =1 If you confused, you can try it to solve in scientific calculator.

• 
  @dantekyle177525 күн бұрын

  Thank you.

• 
  @WisteriatheFirstАй бұрын

  Thank you!!!

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  Perhaps you'd all be better off asking ChatGPT instead of some random KZreadr:- a) What is 16 ÷ 4(3 + 1) ChatGPT To solve the expression 16 ÷ 4(3 + 1), you need to follow the order of operations, which is often remembered by the acronym PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and Addition and Subtraction (from left to right). So, first, you should solve what's inside the parentheses: 3 + 1 = 4 Then, you multiply: 4(4) = 16 Finally, you divide: 16 ÷ 16 = 1 So, 16 ÷ 4(3 + 1) equals 1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conversely:- What is 16 ÷ 4 x (3 + 1) ChatGPT To correctly solve the expression 16 ÷ 4 x (3 + 1), we follow the order of operations: Parentheses: Evaluate what's inside the parentheses. Multiplication and Division (from left to right). Addition and Subtraction (from left to right). So: Inside the parentheses, we have 3 + 1 = 4. Now, we perform the multiplication and division from left to right. We first divide 16 by 4: 16 ÷ 4 = 4 Now, we multiply the result by 4: 4 x 4 = 16 So, the result of the expression 16 ÷ 4 x (3 + 1) is 16. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE THE DIFFERENCE IN PRECEDDENCE BETWEEN EXPLICIT AND IMLICIT/JUXTAPOSED MULTIPLICATION.

• 
  @Cartoonist_EditxАй бұрын

  I was already know that the ans is going to d btw superb explanation 👏

• 
  @PaulRushing88Ай бұрын

  4() is implied / juxtaposition, the true ambiguity is whether juxtaposition shares the same priority as an explicit multiplication sign.

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  Another example of why PEMDAS is only suitable for young children:- 2^^2^^3 PEMDAS evaluates it as 64 It's actually 256 PEMDAS is a primary school tool that breaks down with anything more advanced than very basic math.

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  Wrong. PEMDAS is only fit for primary school level maths. The answer is 1. Learn about the priority of juxtaposed multiplications. PEMDAS says 2a/2a = a² But 2a/2a = 1. Ask anyone who actually USES math professionally instead of just learning ridiculous rules by rote. THIS is the video you should be watching kzread.info/dash/bejne/noB3psWaZse_oKQ.html

• 
  @bryantheutuberАй бұрын

  16÷4(3+1)=? 16+4(4) 16÷16=0

• 
  @Sleezmania52Ай бұрын

  That would be 1

• 
  @qsquared88332 ай бұрын

  Juxtaposition is needed

• 
  @Joao-se9fi2 ай бұрын

  I didn't understand nothing she said your saying too fast

• 
  @patrick-hl9gm2 ай бұрын

  My math grade has gone up so much bc of you tysm

• 
  @SunnyXkjj2 ай бұрын

  Thanks bc my teacher explain it a way that I don’t understand but u helped me because my New York State test is tomorrow wish me luck 🍀

• 
  @jamesconklin1202 ай бұрын

  That’s why I never liked math 🧮, back in my days, The (3+1 ) would have been multiplied by 4 to 16 , then 16 divided by 16= 1 , we followed by the letters PEMDAS , there was no left to right rule

• 
  @maddyXjianhao_edits2 ай бұрын

  PEMDAS PEMDAS OHHHHH

• 
  @melanierodriguez-morey96833 ай бұрын

  Can you please do a part two of PEMDAS

• 
  @melanierodriguez-morey96833 ай бұрын

  1/9 < 1/4 Because 1/4 it’s a quarter of 100% which would make it 25% and for the 1/9 idk how to explain but it would be 11.11% of 100%

• 
  @E_Cleazy3 ай бұрын

  You have to distribute the 4 across (3+1) 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️. The answer is 1. PEMDAS is convention. Distribution is a mathematical law. 16÷4(3+1) = 16÷(4(4+1) = 16÷(4×4) = 1

• 
  @dinahussaini-co8bt3 ай бұрын

  Thank sow much

• 
  @Awesome_Sause134 ай бұрын

  12 cups thank you so much I needed this for my first year of science AASA!

• 
  @user-lr7me6pt1k4 ай бұрын

  or boadmas

• 
  @kevinsolari27444 ай бұрын

  BODMAS/PEMDAS isn't the issue here. It's how the 4(3+1) is treated. It's arguably ambiguous (though you could argue that once the brackets are worked out you lose the brackets so are left with 44 or 4×4. Treating it as 44 is daft so we are left with 4×4 and then 12÷4×4 is clearly 16.)

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  No it's not. Learn about juxtaposed multiplication. The answer is 1.

• 
  @user-sy4te9kg9eАй бұрын

  m.kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZqxhpMWSc8yxc84.html&pp=ygUedGhlIGhvdyBhbmQgd2h5IG9mIG1hdGhlbWF0aWNz

• 
  @user-sy4te9kg9eАй бұрын

  Multiplicación Yuxtapuesta: m.kzread.info/dash/bejne/noB3psWaZse_oKQ.html&pp=ygUedGhlIGhvdyBhbmQgd2h5IG9mIG1hdGhlbWF0aWNz

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  > ...,though you could argue that once the brackets are worked out you lose the brackets No you don't. Once the INSIDE of the brackets are worked out, you're left with 4(4). There are STILL brackets, so they get worked out next to leave 16. Only THEN do you do multiply & divide.

• 
  @Unnie364 ай бұрын

  This is actually so helpful

• 
  @M.T7774 ай бұрын

  Just got a new sub

• 
  @IsraMuse-wl4sx4 ай бұрын

  you write how you doing

• 
  @IsraMuse-wl4sx4 ай бұрын

  is not pemdas is bodmas😊

• 
  @joaoemanoel38033 ай бұрын

  Its the same thing

• 
  @ben-cy6jg4 ай бұрын

  left to right and the multiplication is first before the division why did you start division before multiplication?

• 
  @liliwen33415 ай бұрын

  1/4

• 
  @glenmartin24375 ай бұрын

  Thank you. Never taught this.

• 
  @vanstromi78105 ай бұрын

  Why do I remember an alternate rule where you have to multiply the number in front of the parenthesis then? Seriously, Idk why I’m thinking that. Eg. In this example, 4x3 and 4x1, then add?

• 
  @ericaLopez9225 ай бұрын

  E means Exponents if you’re new to pemdas

• 
  @domicianocatienza76985 ай бұрын

  Where did you buy that pen😅😅

• 
  @Jojo-mc5ho5 ай бұрын

  But why did you use addition first? It's second to the last, before Subtraction, i didn't get the logic for this one, since you mentioned earlier that pemdas is the proper ORDER we need to follow but you didn't follow it really.

• 
  @graysiadhi7 күн бұрын

  It's in parentheses

• 
  @Jojo-mc5ho5 ай бұрын

  PEMDAS rule doesn't really makes sense since you didn't really follow it. I dunno why people created this shtty rule

• 
  @ghostpaul47426 ай бұрын

  Does it only work for 9?

• 
  @minipurse14126 ай бұрын

  Thank you very much😊

• 
  @Waffles20096 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your content. 😊

• 
  @cadencastillogaming6 ай бұрын

  Perfect for my exam! Thank you so much.

• 
  @Itz_Keira9676 ай бұрын

  Tysm THIS HELPS ALOT OMG (pin pls? +EARLY!)

• 
  @user-jb3vq2bg2v6 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much now am not stressing no more 😊😃

• 
  @_.justdior_6 ай бұрын

  Still don’t make sense shouldn’t divide go first since it’s first on (pemdas) or do you go from left to right what’s on the problem

• 
  @realmrdack6 ай бұрын

  Nice 🎉

• 
  @Islam-and-boxing6 ай бұрын

  Finally a video that just gave me the explanation without nonsense haha

• 
  @teetee-zq3og6 ай бұрын

  Lmaoooo😂😂😂😂😂

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  Unfortunately, the explanation is 100% wrong.

• 
  @Islam-and-boxingАй бұрын

  ​@@peterthomas5792 it really isn't wrong. I used this method in a question in my coding course. You have to know about pemdas for coding. The result was correct because I followed this explanation.

• 
  @peterthomas5792Ай бұрын

  ​@@Islam-and-boxing Coding knows nothing about juxtaposed multiplication or stacked exponentiation, so coding will never teach you why PEMDAS is wrong. Try doing a maths course taught by someone who actually USES maths professionally such as, well, a mathematician, physicist or engineer.

• 
  @Islam-and-boxingАй бұрын

  @@peterthomas5792 Well you've made a claim... Can you now provide the evidence of how it's 100% wrong?

• 
  @hk212146 ай бұрын

  RECIPROCAL (i think)

• 
  @sundtuber85916 ай бұрын

  We have bodmas bruh

• 
  @user-_human5307 ай бұрын

  I’m in 3rd. Grade and I know this

• 
  @shahgaming.17 ай бұрын

  Can you plezz make a one video for me about the math begner to advaced❤❤

• 
  @ILOVECHICKEN6987 ай бұрын

  I like she uses 2 digits number when in real life u use three or more