Пікірлер

• 
  @idontcare4490Ай бұрын

  Okay so it’s been 13 years since this talk. What are the updates? Did we do it?

• 
  @granitfogАй бұрын

  Existential security gives rise to liberalism; liberalism thrives in an environment of existential security, while the deficit of security allows liberalism ot be rejected or to gives rise to fundamentalism - excellent (~TS 8:20+)

• 
  @user-yi3dw1uk8gАй бұрын

  Neil always trying to show how insignificant humans are

• 
  @markrussell34282 ай бұрын

  How about: Shadbreet (transmasculine) Mushareff (CIS-lesbian) and Adele (non-Binary) all age 4. LET US ALL AGREE - this is child abuse.

• 
  @markrussell34282 ай бұрын

  2:00 min to understand Tyson you need to see "20. Richard Dawkins - Beyond Belief 2006" Dawkin's comments were biting and they were beautifully eloquent, summoned up as: "“Roughgarden, the science doesn’t care about your feelings". Dawkins closing comment here nails it again! It is precisely what needs to be said. In hindsight, Tyson is heading down the road of intellectual appeasement. He comes out of this looking bad - really bad, given his desire for compromise and falling prey to "sensitivity" and "being nice", In 2006, this is preciously the weakness the likes of Roughgarden seek to exploit - intellectual appeasement. This is what is responsible for the deplorable state of the sciences in 2024. Roughgarden has succeeded in undermining biological realities - manipulated people and the mutilation of children has become the result. With that, Roughgarden is very happy.

• 
  @markrussell34282 ай бұрын

  So awesome to look back at Roughgarden from 2024. This person just wants everyone to be nice and ignore reality so a distorted biological perspective can take hold and the actual science is explained away. The real sadistic motives of 2006 have become all the more clear today, notice how Roughgarden even slips in "power" as the central tenants to the thesis. Another "mystical" dimension that goes along with using theology to explain things away. There is no social conflict here - its a confused scientist that is establishing a world view that grooms and confuses children. Dawkins in his own poetic manner is essentially saying "I don't care about your feelings or moral imperatives". IF more scientists actually put facts and the best scientific truth forward the world would be in a better place and the U.S. sex reassignment surgery market size wouldn't have ballooned to an estimated USD 2.1 billion in 2022.

• 
  @markrussell34282 ай бұрын

  This is a pathetic attempt by Roughgarden to feel validated and will go so far as to use faith as an instrument. Roughgarden wants to make nice and in so doing doesn't give a crap about the collateral damage being done to children.

• 
  @spockspock3 ай бұрын

  Very good.

• 
  @gonzalogarcia-atance58403 ай бұрын

  For ultrasonic cavitation, you can use this dimensionless number: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Garcia-Atance_number_for_ultrasonic_cavitation.png

• 
  @moesypittounikos3 ай бұрын

  Its wierd seing Ben Stiller buying a ticket to a V.S Ramachandran talk instead of being in films when he was younger.

• 
  @moesypittounikos3 ай бұрын

  Why does Richard Dawkins insist the priest who reported seeing nothing when wearing the Persinger helmet was lying when he himself says he saw nothing? Did you miss that slight of hand? Another slight of hand is when Dawkins goes on to say that he himself saw nothing to force the conclusion of the hypothesis of Persinger, as he wants the conclusion to be true, when both subjects reported the same thing. Then Richard Dawkins smuggled an anti-scientific idea in his monologue in arguing the Persinger helmet produces religious experiences to those who want to believe. This why Dawkins said the priest was lying. What a agoistic man to presume the conclusion and insist another subject isn't telling the truth because it doesn't fit his conclusion. Isn't Richard Dawkins acting like those religious people who insist the other guy is sinful? And the fact V.S Ramachandran doesn't spot Dawkins absurdities is because he also wants to believe his own model of the universe. I think Americans think Brits are sophisticated, like James Bond, and this must be why Richard Dawkins is sean as a heavyweight mind😅 I'm baffled as the near adulation and worship surrounding Richard Dawkins. The man is a narcissist. And the above one upmanship from Richard Dawkins peppers most of his KZread clips. He isnt a fair player in he arena of truth but, like a cult leader, his adoring devotees hang on his every word. Richard Dawkins is wined and dined by a dumbed down world.

• 
  @srewsmurf4 ай бұрын

  ❤

• 
  @DrZoonotics4 ай бұрын

  Quack Wakefield, like tRump, is a whiny SOB crying how he is a "victim".

• 
  @ingeniousmechanic4 ай бұрын

  Craziest, most insane thing ever, is that peter popoff has been BACK on television selling his miracle water for several years now 🙄 Mr Randi spent many years doing a great service to his fellow man, by calling out these frauds. I hope he found peace with God and Christ. I firmly believe in the God of the Bible, i understand Mr Randi had doubts about that. Unfortunately, he was brought into a group, like many, that have spent centuries misinterpreting that old book for their own gain. I've had the privilege and blessings of being born and surrounded by many who simply and himbly take the Bible for what it is, and continually seek Gods guidance and blessing in interpreting and applying it to our lives not for gain, but for His Glory.

• 
  @youtubezcyАй бұрын

  Are there any religions or Holy Books that are not real in your estimation?

• 
  @ingeniousmechanicАй бұрын

  @@youtubezcy the only 'holy book' worth mentioning is the Bible. There are thousands of things and ideas through the ages that humans have worshipped, and I understand that the Bible isn't 'easy' to believe, but there's no question there's no other book in history quite as unique as the Bible. And just on a personal note, I feel there is power in that old book. No other spiritual idea has been copied, questioned, misrepresented, or emulated, or plagiarized as much as God of the Bible.

• 
  @colincharlton93394 ай бұрын

  That's a very old trick...😂😂, I knew few people who could do that..

• 
  @dirtycelinefrenchman6 ай бұрын

  Atran presents science, empirical data, which goes against Harris’s claims and, tellingly, Harris rolls on past, refusing to engage with the evidence. This is a good example of Harris’s zealotry and preference for scientism over actual science. This is where his commitment to logical argumentation breaks down. Ironically, for Harris, the cause trumps the evidence. All these years later and it’s a paradox h’s never brought himself to confront.

• 
  @dirtycelinefrenchman6 ай бұрын

  Buddhists martyr themselves for political causes, it’s called self-immolation.

• 
  @dirtycelinefrenchman6 ай бұрын

  Buddhists martyr themselves for political causes, it’s called self-immolation.

• 
  @weavethehawk6 ай бұрын

  I LOVE this guy. He performs tricks and calls them TRICKS. He's an atheist, just like me, and there is no magical nonsense to being a person who does NOT believe in the supernatural, unfortunately, he died. He did NOT PASS AWAY, he simply died. I have never heard anyone explain where people "pass away" to when they say "he/she passed away". There is no "passing". there is living, and dying. We will, all of us, experience both conditions. Unfortunately we will be unable to relate to the rest of the fortunate remaining living, what death is like. I'd love to know, and be able to deliver a report, but unfortunately, I'll be dead.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  Yes. HE DID PASS AWAY. DEAD IS NOT THE END. THERE IS SIMPLY LIFE AND LIFE AFTER DEATH. ACCEPT IT. DEAL WITH FACT. HE IS NOT DEAD. HE IS IN ASTRAL. YOU HAVE 0 EVIDENCE THERE IS DIFFERENT.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  Yes. There is passing because death is not the end. 😊

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  Not. Unfortunately he not died. He Pass away because death is not permanent. There is hard fact life after death. You must get over it.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  Supernatural is fact. 😊

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  This Guy was miseable people

• 
  @ashwin2466 ай бұрын

  OK ramkumar

• 
  @ochithyafernando10507 ай бұрын

  which one was the phony movie scene tho

• 
  @DANCEGARAGEPUNK7 ай бұрын

  Fooled by 1 man, Gellor - The CIA spent millions of $$$s on paranormal investigation : ( 1 man, Randi, also paid by the CIA, proved the CIA wrong ! We know the CIA are incompetent, but anyone smell a rat ? ? : )

• 
  @user-kh5yo8mr3n7 ай бұрын

  miss you so much, my love

• 
  @Bar_Steward7 ай бұрын

  sometimes i think these PHD guys just wanted an excuse to talk to the amazing Randi

• 
  @failurehaus59798 ай бұрын

  this is great content, but why the hell is this the only visual fluid videos available? like i don't even think my professors know what the shit they're teaching in the textbook means or represents, everything is just a simulation. Why the hell doesn't anyone still do stuff like this anymore to actually teach people something

• 
  @fretzT_T2 ай бұрын

  physical fluid simulation takes time and resources. So most of the simulation is done on computers. But concepts like this are very hard to simulate on computer for the average professor and requires deep simulation knowledge. So they leave it altogether.

• 
  @connorgreenwell10318 ай бұрын

  Rodi's fluids class where you at

• 
  @joaopedrobustamante40829 ай бұрын

  Really god video, but quality let desire... hugs from argentina!! messi n°1!!!!

• 
  @luisclaudio46229 ай бұрын

  Harris is like an 8 year old with anger issues. Tysons question n Harris' answer tells me everything about Harris. People and groups of people (including himself n what he is doing in this very video) make claims all the time. So y is he so uptight about this one?

• 
  @Horace__635 ай бұрын

  Are u retarded?

• 
  @user-bc6iq2zi6r9 ай бұрын

  one of the greatest people in the world

• 
  @fernbracken9 ай бұрын

  operation bluebook and majestic 12 were both senate and CIA agendas to ridicule anything paranormal such as UFOs and psychics james randi was well paid to assist in this do not forget he was filmed at the jersey care home where small boys were regularly abused by homosexuals he was exposed by david icke for the criminal pervert he was

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinNo. He is not paranoid and delusional. You And Randi are paranoid and delusional. People has gift. Grow up.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinIf you believe that bs you gullible that a flat earther.

• 
  @joeelliott39809 ай бұрын

  kzread.info/dash/bejne/doalztiqeKW8c8o.html

• 
  @notlock9 ай бұрын

  I have two premises which if you accept then I believe that a certain outcome arises. The first premise is that we believe other minds exist; i.e. we are not solipsists. The second premise is that we can never have direct access to another’s subjective experience (consciousness for brevity) independently of our own in such a way as to verify that they do in fact have consciousness independent of our own. If you accept both premises it follows that we have some criteria for judging if an entity is having subjective experience and that that criteria must involve some comprehension regarding the behavior of the subject. Note that our criteria for judging whether an entity has consciousness normatively is an anthropomorphic procedure. We acknowledge our own subjective experience, and that which behaves similarly - most notably other humans - we conclude must have it too. Insofar as we try to determine if a thing has subjective experience at all, we cannot put the cart before the horse so to speak and say that the ostensibly 'conscious' entity must have any determinate physical makeup. The reason for this has to do with that we cannot understand the mechanism that generates 'consciousness' before we determine what has it. 'Consciousness'/subjective experience is a behavioral indication that is reflective. Complex reflective behavior should be expected of complex entities like humans but one ought to ask what the smallest increment of a 'reflective behavior' might be and what that tends to include and or exclude from our assignation of 'having a subjective experience'.

• 
  @notlock9 ай бұрын

  And in my first premise when I refer to mind I'm referring to 'a subjective experience' to be clear.

• 
  @lmfao694209 ай бұрын

  Santa Claus really did a lot in his life.

• 
  @claudiamuller37989 ай бұрын

  Richard Dawkins is brilliant. Always authentic and understandable.

• 
  @richardadu-gyamfi79569 ай бұрын

  2:38 What was the question beyond belief to Sam Harris

• 
  @davidpeterzell7899 ай бұрын

  Back when it was somewhat safer to talk about this.

• 
  @allpsychicsarefraudsfact835710 ай бұрын

  if you believe the dead can communicate then you are beyond simple! dead = dead!

• 
  @brianmueller791310 ай бұрын

  Simply put, his unclaimed 'million dollar challenge' does not prove that deceased spirits have never been contacted. Randi strongly implies that, but will never say it. IMO, he is one of the hucksters too.

• 
  @allpsychicsarefraudsfact835710 ай бұрын

  Do you REALLY think the dead can communicate!? Remember that the dead cannot possibly communicate because they are DEAD! How was Randi a huckster?

• 
  @brianmueller791310 ай бұрын

  @@allpsychicsarefraudsfact8357 Because he found an audience of folks like you that think the same way. Folks that don't believe in the spirit realm and think that all psychics are frauds, so he crafted a skit with his beard, his humor and his knowledge of magic tricks. Together he found quite a nitch for himself...viciously using Uri Geller as an object of hate and opportunity to springboard his new career. The harm is that he exploited psychic frauds in an attempt to debunk the entire spirit realm. When actually he did no such thing. If Jesus appeared to him and touched his heart, Randi wouldn't be swayed unless Jesus passed his blockheaded million dollar challenge. Also, since Randi has not been convinced yet that the spirit realm exists, and that sometimes spirits communicate with us, it proves his closed mindedness. Besides, he personally gained more from what he was doing than he ever prevented. Bet he knows now that what he was doing was self-serving and wrong. Oh, can you tell that I don't like blockheads that pretend to be smart? He is the definition of dense.

• 
  @origenjerome80318 ай бұрын

  To be honest, it should be very easy to pass Randi's blockheaded million dollar challenge. You can dissolve in thin air, resurrect cremated ashes back into an alive human again, or maybe turn an entire building from concrete into solid gold instantly. Just do it, man.

• 
  @brianmueller79138 ай бұрын

  @@origenjerome8031 Have you ever experienced the highly trained, true masters of deception work their magic? I am talking about lawyers. It is shocking to see in action. It starts with picking an audience (jury) that is already in their corner...very similar to what Randi is doing. In Randi's case it is easy to find people that hate fraud. Yet it is his unspoken undertone that says nothing paranormal has ever happened on the face of the earth. That is where people like Randi, Penn and Teller and Neil deGrasse Tyson show that they have no common sense. You appear to be in the "no common sense" category.

• 
  @Emma-Queenofhell5 ай бұрын

  ​@brianmueller7913 common sense various person by person I find what is common knowledge to you is in all likelihood not to others before you say well you simply never experienced the supernatural I haven't you are correct that's because I don't think there is such a thing as supernatural events. But I have had experienced that can be called ghostlike. I later found a logic explanation for all of them.

• 
  @walter657410 ай бұрын

  What does it feel like to be in a room full of brilliant minds, and they know each other? I wish I had the horse power to belong in that group.

• 
  @DaveO131010 ай бұрын

  That fluctuating momentum dance at 18:52 is priceless.

• 
  @CalloohCalley10 ай бұрын

  Locating consciousness is a bit like asking "where is the ecosystem?"

• 
  @chrispmar10 ай бұрын

  The self is an illusion, andalong with it all it's most cherished beliefs, the belief in space, time, causality, subject and object, that the universe and all it's object are substantial and real, the belief that life has meaning and purpose, or that we humans at least feel compelled to create them (which is true, but they are only apparently real and sensical pursuits for a self). No self, no reason to try to create meaning and purpose. And when there is seen to be no self the idea of a creator or intelligence or any source behind the universe becomes absurd. Science is still caught in the illusion of the reality of a self even as they show experimentally that it is just an illusion. Feeling the apparent reality of a self compels the self to give significance to itself. But there is no self and nothing to give significance to.

• 
  @dwwheelock10 ай бұрын

  Amen, Brother Tyson! Praise science!

• 
  @woodysdrums808310 ай бұрын

  Tyson is such a phoney schill hack..he's everything wrong with modern science and is a horrible representative I think people see through him these days.

• 
  @jesusbermudez677510 ай бұрын

  well I do have the paranormal capacity to see the subconscious of people.

• 
  @jesusbermudez67758 ай бұрын

  Yes, I do. I've been writing what I observe; however, one such story of the subconscious is this one An encounter with the perfect man I'm sitting outside a coffee shop opposite the university where I work when a lecturer colleague, Fred, as he's going past says to me, 'What's this irresponsible Venezuelan doing in the UK?' Ignoring his remark I ask, 'Have you noticed how students seem to be quite late to classes nowadays?' He checks his stride to say, 'Well, I've noticed how people no longer seem to queue at bus stops.' I continue by telling him about the ring scam where the perpetrator bends just in front of one pretending he's picking up a ring he's just found; he then tries to fit it on one of his fingers, but as it doesn't, he's willing to exchange it for any cash one wishes to volunteer. Remembering how silent I used to be Fred is stunned by my chattiness, and comes to a halt. He gives me a perplexed look as if I were an extra-terrestrial. Rather than continue walking, he backtracks, enters the coffee shop, comes out with a salad and sits beside me. I quiz him on Bill Gates. He replies, belittling this famous person, 'Who's that? Who's that?' So I give him my thoughts on Gates through my interpretation of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, 'There are two main characters - the Witch and Snow White. The witch represents the person who, although not superior, demands superiority at whatever activity. She is the person who is fuming for not having been born superior. Whereas, Snow White is the person who is superior.' Giving me an inquisitive look he drawls, 'How do you think of that?' I was truly enjoying this. I was finally getting even with Fred after many years of being on the losing side. I go for the killer blow and tell him my thoughts on the perfect man - 'The perfect man goes to Trafalgar Square and stands there like a statue for the rest of his life.' After a silence, he exclaims, 'That's Nelson!' Again he goes silent, whilst I wait to see if the blow has done the trick. Yes it has! He can't take it any more. Suddenly he stands up; with terror filled eyes he asserts, 'It's a question of security.' I lower my head and acknowledge, 'Yes that's the word, security' Staring at me suspiciously he picks the empty plate. 'I'm going to pay the man his security,' he says, and goes into the coffee shop. He comes out, and walking close to me, giving me a distasteful, suspicious, angry and frightened look, and nearly head-butting me he exclaims, 'The birds will shit on him!' Lowering my head, I reply, 'No, he's too strong.' He then distances himself from me. Well, it's now time to introduce the perfect man to others and as there are two colleagues in my office, I ask them, 'Do you know who the perfect man is?' both in tandem reply, 'me!' By now, I can hardly contain my laughter, but I do manage to keep a straight face and tell them, 'No, the perfect man goes to Trafalgar Square and stands there like a statue for the rest of his life.' Both immediately reply, 'The birds will shit on him!' My fourth introduction of the perfect man is to a Kenyan friend. The others had been from Scotland, England and Wales. It just goes to show all human beings are the same because as soon as I mention that the perfect man walks to Trafalgar Square and stands there like a statue, my Kenyan friend tightens his fingers and moving his hand as if he were about to lay something says, 'The birds will shit on him!' Again I laugh, and he remarks, “what are you some kind of psychologist?” Poor perfect man - he is not welcomed anywhere! Questions: why do the people want to attack the statue? What has the statue done to them? If they want to destroy the statue is because they fear the statue, why should they fear an inanimate object? Copyright JA Bermúdez Silva All Rights reserved February 2008 Just a few observations as to why this is of the subconscious. When the people in the office say, "the birds will shit on him!" they are not conscious of saying it. It is their subconscious that is saying it. Similarly when the Kenyan moves his hand, he is not conscious he is doing this, but it is his subconscious that is doing it. I wish Randy were alive so that I could explain to him what I can see. @@sea-pin

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinYes. There is no natural. Paranormal phenomena are fact.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinYou are deluded. Only paranormal are real.

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinYes, yes. There is no paranormal like there is no dogs and cats. 😂😂🤣🤣🤣

• 
  @jakubdub75575 ай бұрын

  ​@@sea-pinonly in your gullible brain

• 
  @hemantdhakwal648910 ай бұрын

  Excellent experiment

• 
  @NikhilRajBirua11 ай бұрын

  This is gold.

• 
  @shyamasingh902011 ай бұрын

  Super Articulation of Complex Natural Sciences Phenomenon deciphering the physics behind in between geochemical interaction surfaces earthing elements and grounding gaseous pipeline bonds breaking molecular machinery cavitation leading weight loss to brain damage sensitivity altered shock waves treatment induced high tensions caused heavy stresses strained penetrations through glasses and walls washed white noises amplified by external sources traced environment energy directed flows states chained both sides channeling magnetohydrodynamic drive controlled cognitive systems regulating effects focused mindset shifts lifts drags or drifts and distorts tunnelled vision during both rest friction and movement fragmentation by invisible enemy design enforced silence outside yet symbolic violence inside as cause of death still unknown but indeed widely known mechanism for protection of black critical mass void of corruption

• 
  @andreamangolini547311 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much! 🙏🏻

• 
  @SciMajor111 ай бұрын

  When you take away all the nonsense from religion nothing is left so the idea that Neil, whom we all know and love, is proposing is non sequitur.