Hello, I would like to ask which adapter ring is used for the mir-11 12mm/2.2 lens installed on eosm? I have one now, but I bought the wrong adapter😭😭😭
@CarmineTavernaPhotographyАй бұрын
Great content...cheers
@mononciovisualАй бұрын
Splendid !
@givara13Ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this amazing knowledge
@dairennАй бұрын
Absolutely gorgeous. Quit possibly the best non-film footage I have ever seen. What a lens.
@thehedgeknightnc3681Ай бұрын
Just curious. Does anyone know what size filter threads does this lens use?
@Jailoyal1Ай бұрын
Very beautiful footage 🙌
@FIRUFILMSАй бұрын
Nice, the shots was on the original BMPCC ?, any crop in post?, thanks
@alanbesedinАй бұрын
No crop on the original BMPCC :)
@FIRUFILMSАй бұрын
@@alanbesedin OHH Amazing! you shot the videos on CINEMA DNG RAW? or prores?
@theotherHOLLYWOOD2 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation. Thank you. You answered a lot of the questions I had.
@randallstewart12242 ай бұрын
I'm a big fan of the SP class of Adaptall II lenses from Tamron, of which its 28mm prime lens is NOT included. I own a number of them. However, in terms of doing what you buy a lens for, putting an image on a piece of film, this 28mm is no better than a mediocre to average performer by the standards of its time, and even less so now. That is perfectly expected, as it is not one of the SP lenses, where Tamron pulled out the stops and made lenses which were as good or better and most of the maker camera/lens producers. Depending on your need lens mount, you should be able to find a 28mm from a major maker or another independent maker which will exceed the performance of this lens for a similar price. Example, for Nikon, the later versions of its 28mm 3.5 will greatly blow this lens away, and probably cost less because of the hype given this lens.
@LaceyFilm2 ай бұрын
'it's very sharp, even wide open' then cuts to a soft shot of a pretty girl.
@Apollolabsphoto2 ай бұрын
Years later but pretty helpful. Which is the lighter of the tokina or tamron?
@AC7_79 күн бұрын
Probably the tamron since it’s not made of metal
@DentReversal3 ай бұрын
I have a 70-210 RMC 3.5 the look is very similar to your f4 especially background bokeh
@RosaIselaUrbanoGonzslez3 ай бұрын
Iugh Canon 😂
@dimaksinc42824 ай бұрын
😍😍😍
@vintageaudiohifi55454 ай бұрын
please tell me, what do you know about sankor 16c anamorphic lens ? is better then kowa ?
@vintageaudiohifi55454 ай бұрын
very nice video ! tnx a lot! one single question please. What is the minimum focal taken lens you can use with these anamorphic adaptors ? you can use below 50mm lenses ?
@safemode85984 ай бұрын
looks very pleasing for video, but I think it might be to soft of an image for Photos
@apostolicbible14 ай бұрын
I have a Konica Hexanon 35mm f2.8 to do my YT videos; but I just purchased a FD 35mm f2.8. It will be interesting to see the difference on my Canon R8. The Hexanon is super sharp. I do head shots at f16 trying to get the background library super sharp. Help stamp out Northrup Bokeh!
@user-yu6hm3ns5c4 ай бұрын
чому не державною?
@awolsurf-TC5 ай бұрын
Nice!!! I'm just getting back into shooting with FD lenses on a Sony camera. Always loved the look.
@lowIQstuff5 ай бұрын
radioactive lenses
@sdufg5 ай бұрын
come on people..is this just a m42 mount?? ...is that all i need..i'm not gonna spend $75 on an adapter to m43. help please
@jorge-37686 ай бұрын
Great video. Very nice birds and music. I could relax and think about manu nice stuff watching it
@makemystronger..freemegapi68006 ай бұрын
Tokina or tamron? For image quality
@luisadrianlara55617 ай бұрын
5 years later we’re looking at closer to 3k for this set
@353Studios7 ай бұрын
I just bought it ... I'm anxious to try it. I searched for the flexible track .... dang, it's expensive!!!!!!
@ZeLoShady8 ай бұрын
Why do you need a capturing lens for some of these?
@alanbesedin8 ай бұрын
Anamorphic projection lenses and adapters can’t focus to infinity without a spherical lens behind them
@pix4work8 ай бұрын
Great conversation with amazing content/information! Thank you.
@D1N028 ай бұрын
I think this is the same lens as the Raynox 135mm 1:2.8 and the Ringfoto 135mm 1:2.8 It was made by Cimko in Japan. But take care, there are several versions, also by different manufacturers. It has to look like the lens in the beginning of the video (58mm filter thread if I'm right). Simply being called Optomax 135mm 1:2.8 means zilch since different suppliers were used for the same brand name. This video looks excellent. I guess you stopped down for some sharpness.
@VietinghoffAlex9 ай бұрын
Awesome interview! Thanks for doing this! Last winter I shot a short film with my FX3 to Prores Raw (on Helios lenses with a Great Joy 1.33x anamorphic adapter), and I used Assimilate Scratch to convert the Prores Raw to CDNG so I could edit in Resolve. There's also an app called Raw Converter that can do the same thing.
@MarkHoltze9 ай бұрын
Great convo you two!! The Cinema Lens Manual is my favourite piece of literature I've bought....EVER.
@alanbesedin9 ай бұрын
It's so good!
@pokrovsky-production9 ай бұрын
Hi, which exact gears you used from cool lax?
@dpixvid9 ай бұрын
Great interview! Thanks so much!!! Best of luck in the future Oren! Great work! Merci Alan! Love the lens info and why you like what you like 👍👍👍 + the lighting 👍👍👍
@YOUAREMYKIN9 ай бұрын
Such a great conversation to witness as a filmmaker. Looking forward to what Oren does next
@Seafox00119 ай бұрын
Excellent conversation and questions. Interesting the choice of going for a more human ‘look’ i.e. less clinical digital even though the movie is as heavy with CGI as any contemporary movie can be.
@PeaLoop9 ай бұрын
Fantastic discussion.
@alanbesedin9 ай бұрын
Hope everyone enjoyed this. I didn't ask all the nerdy vintage lens questions I had for Oren, but hopefully, we'll do a part 2 soon!
@amermeleitor9 ай бұрын
The Vivitar one is great. I had it in FD mount and sold it with all my FD lenses, only because i hate the FD mount
@nicklaytonUK9 ай бұрын
I just bought the ISCO 2000. On the Sigma FP with a Nikkor 50mm F1.2 taking lens it is lovely, hardly any vignetting and fine if you don't pixel peep!
@LogEducation9 ай бұрын
DOES ANY ONE Know how to change the battery for controller pd2 HT air?
@jocknarn322510 ай бұрын
Tamron-F 200/f3.5 62mm filter dia. Managed AUD $70 incl post. Clean glass. Smooth focussing. 6 aperture blades. 4 elements / 3 grps. Hi-qual feel & handling.
@KaceyBakerFilms11 ай бұрын
Sensational
@AlekseyProxy11 ай бұрын
hello, where did you buy the adapter for Mir-11 12.5mm F2.2 ?
@pjfsr702411 ай бұрын
First camera I ever bought was in an army PX, it was ( still is ) my Canon FT Ql- with this 55 F1.2, still kicking, but now on my Sony A6000 with FD-E adapter. My son wanted to do film photography, I had a Canon G3, so I gave him the Canon F,T a month later he gifted me his A6000 and 4 lenses- 16mm 2.8, 16-50 kit, a 55-210 kit TWO 35mm Sony 1.8 and Neewer 1.7. Son found my 55 a bit heavy so he bought his own 50mm1.4 SSC and returned my 55-1.2. I also have these lenses below, my problem is never what lens to buy, but which lens do I want to use. Camera FT with 55 F1.2 Lens cost me..125$, in 1971. I have a Canon 50-1.8, Tamron 28mm and 135mm Tele, Canon 35-105 with macro, Vivitar 75-205, a Sigma 75-200mm and finally a INA 350mm F5.5
@1stsquadrone81011 ай бұрын
I was so impressed with this cinematography I got the lens and an adapter THANKS!!!
@KarbisSarafyan11 ай бұрын
what mount did you use to attach your this lens to the blackmagic?
@ianzhao569311 ай бұрын
Is this the new fd? Thanks
@randallstewart1224 Жыл бұрын
I bought the Tamron 17mm about 40 years ago. At that time, it was just about the only choice short of paying twice as much or more for a Nikkor. I've actually used it very little over the years because ultra wide imaging and I just do not seem to get along. A friend of mine used it a couple of times on our landscape trips and thought quite highly of it. (Thanks Adaptall II mounts) I always assume that these types of lenses will not perform very well wider than f 8.0, so sharpness isn't an issue. At least, my copy of the lens will flare like nothing else I've ever owned if you are foolish enough to get the sun in the image, its open major flaw.
Пікірлер
Thx! Like you video so much!
Hello, I would like to ask which adapter ring is used for the mir-11 12mm/2.2 lens installed on eosm? I have one now, but I bought the wrong adapter😭😭😭
Great content...cheers
Splendid !
Thank you for sharing this amazing knowledge
Absolutely gorgeous. Quit possibly the best non-film footage I have ever seen. What a lens.
Just curious. Does anyone know what size filter threads does this lens use?
Very beautiful footage 🙌
Nice, the shots was on the original BMPCC ?, any crop in post?, thanks
No crop on the original BMPCC :)
@@alanbesedin OHH Amazing! you shot the videos on CINEMA DNG RAW? or prores?
Excellent presentation. Thank you. You answered a lot of the questions I had.
I'm a big fan of the SP class of Adaptall II lenses from Tamron, of which its 28mm prime lens is NOT included. I own a number of them. However, in terms of doing what you buy a lens for, putting an image on a piece of film, this 28mm is no better than a mediocre to average performer by the standards of its time, and even less so now. That is perfectly expected, as it is not one of the SP lenses, where Tamron pulled out the stops and made lenses which were as good or better and most of the maker camera/lens producers. Depending on your need lens mount, you should be able to find a 28mm from a major maker or another independent maker which will exceed the performance of this lens for a similar price. Example, for Nikon, the later versions of its 28mm 3.5 will greatly blow this lens away, and probably cost less because of the hype given this lens.
'it's very sharp, even wide open' then cuts to a soft shot of a pretty girl.
Years later but pretty helpful. Which is the lighter of the tokina or tamron?
Probably the tamron since it’s not made of metal
I have a 70-210 RMC 3.5 the look is very similar to your f4 especially background bokeh
Iugh Canon 😂
😍😍😍
please tell me, what do you know about sankor 16c anamorphic lens ? is better then kowa ?
very nice video ! tnx a lot! one single question please. What is the minimum focal taken lens you can use with these anamorphic adaptors ? you can use below 50mm lenses ?
looks very pleasing for video, but I think it might be to soft of an image for Photos
I have a Konica Hexanon 35mm f2.8 to do my YT videos; but I just purchased a FD 35mm f2.8. It will be interesting to see the difference on my Canon R8. The Hexanon is super sharp. I do head shots at f16 trying to get the background library super sharp. Help stamp out Northrup Bokeh!
чому не державною?
Nice!!! I'm just getting back into shooting with FD lenses on a Sony camera. Always loved the look.
radioactive lenses
come on people..is this just a m42 mount?? ...is that all i need..i'm not gonna spend $75 on an adapter to m43. help please
Great video. Very nice birds and music. I could relax and think about manu nice stuff watching it
Tokina or tamron? For image quality
5 years later we’re looking at closer to 3k for this set
I just bought it ... I'm anxious to try it. I searched for the flexible track .... dang, it's expensive!!!!!!
Why do you need a capturing lens for some of these?
Anamorphic projection lenses and adapters can’t focus to infinity without a spherical lens behind them
Great conversation with amazing content/information! Thank you.
I think this is the same lens as the Raynox 135mm 1:2.8 and the Ringfoto 135mm 1:2.8 It was made by Cimko in Japan. But take care, there are several versions, also by different manufacturers. It has to look like the lens in the beginning of the video (58mm filter thread if I'm right). Simply being called Optomax 135mm 1:2.8 means zilch since different suppliers were used for the same brand name. This video looks excellent. I guess you stopped down for some sharpness.
Awesome interview! Thanks for doing this! Last winter I shot a short film with my FX3 to Prores Raw (on Helios lenses with a Great Joy 1.33x anamorphic adapter), and I used Assimilate Scratch to convert the Prores Raw to CDNG so I could edit in Resolve. There's also an app called Raw Converter that can do the same thing.
Great convo you two!! The Cinema Lens Manual is my favourite piece of literature I've bought....EVER.
It's so good!
Hi, which exact gears you used from cool lax?
Great interview! Thanks so much!!! Best of luck in the future Oren! Great work! Merci Alan! Love the lens info and why you like what you like 👍👍👍 + the lighting 👍👍👍
Such a great conversation to witness as a filmmaker. Looking forward to what Oren does next
Excellent conversation and questions. Interesting the choice of going for a more human ‘look’ i.e. less clinical digital even though the movie is as heavy with CGI as any contemporary movie can be.
Fantastic discussion.
Hope everyone enjoyed this. I didn't ask all the nerdy vintage lens questions I had for Oren, but hopefully, we'll do a part 2 soon!
The Vivitar one is great. I had it in FD mount and sold it with all my FD lenses, only because i hate the FD mount
I just bought the ISCO 2000. On the Sigma FP with a Nikkor 50mm F1.2 taking lens it is lovely, hardly any vignetting and fine if you don't pixel peep!
DOES ANY ONE Know how to change the battery for controller pd2 HT air?
Tamron-F 200/f3.5 62mm filter dia. Managed AUD $70 incl post. Clean glass. Smooth focussing. 6 aperture blades. 4 elements / 3 grps. Hi-qual feel & handling.
Sensational
hello, where did you buy the adapter for Mir-11 12.5mm F2.2 ?
First camera I ever bought was in an army PX, it was ( still is ) my Canon FT Ql- with this 55 F1.2, still kicking, but now on my Sony A6000 with FD-E adapter. My son wanted to do film photography, I had a Canon G3, so I gave him the Canon F,T a month later he gifted me his A6000 and 4 lenses- 16mm 2.8, 16-50 kit, a 55-210 kit TWO 35mm Sony 1.8 and Neewer 1.7. Son found my 55 a bit heavy so he bought his own 50mm1.4 SSC and returned my 55-1.2. I also have these lenses below, my problem is never what lens to buy, but which lens do I want to use. Camera FT with 55 F1.2 Lens cost me..125$, in 1971. I have a Canon 50-1.8, Tamron 28mm and 135mm Tele, Canon 35-105 with macro, Vivitar 75-205, a Sigma 75-200mm and finally a INA 350mm F5.5
I was so impressed with this cinematography I got the lens and an adapter THANKS!!!
what mount did you use to attach your this lens to the blackmagic?
Is this the new fd? Thanks
I bought the Tamron 17mm about 40 years ago. At that time, it was just about the only choice short of paying twice as much or more for a Nikkor. I've actually used it very little over the years because ultra wide imaging and I just do not seem to get along. A friend of mine used it a couple of times on our landscape trips and thought quite highly of it. (Thanks Adaptall II mounts) I always assume that these types of lenses will not perform very well wider than f 8.0, so sharpness isn't an issue. At least, my copy of the lens will flare like nothing else I've ever owned if you are foolish enough to get the sun in the image, its open major flaw.