Пікірлер

• 
  @mutteringmale5 күн бұрын

  "powerful engines producing 1250 Hp...." Lol. We have cars that have that horsepower to day. We've come a long way.

• 
  @cheezit0-08 күн бұрын

  Underated

• 
  @iainb157712 күн бұрын

  Why is Sam Willis not narrating?

• 
  @seanbigay104228 күн бұрын

  This is excellent. However, I really feel the battle can't be fully understood without knowing the Via Dolorosa the Russians trod in somehow coming over 18,000 miles to meet the Japanese in the Straits of Tsushima. Put simply, the Russian fleet was the worst on the high seas, an "archaeological collection of naval architecture" (to quote the bitter words of its commander Adm. Rozhestvensky), manned by ill-trained and demoralized conscripts led by often incompetent and untrustworthy officers (whose presence accounts for the competent and trustworthy Rozhestvensky's temper, which only grew more vile as he shepherded this ragtag gang of lunatic cats to its doom). The result of the Russians' ill-preparedness can be seen in this video's schematic view of the battle. To be blunt, the Japanese know what they're doing; the Russians don't. Thus the former systematically and mercilessly slaughter the latter, no matter how hard the Russians try to fight.

• 
  @Electric725Ай бұрын

  I have one of these shrouds it has a black coffin on it with a jolly roger

• 
  @plymouthnnfАй бұрын

  what angle do you put the Titanic at when it split? looking at the animations that seems like 30+ angle which is incorrect if you follow James Cameron Titanic "1997" version.

• 
  @doomguydudeАй бұрын

  Awsome and outstanding job.

• 
  @riccardosilva57362 ай бұрын

  TOP.

• 
  @thebadasseryfactory2 ай бұрын

  how about making sure dolphins, whales, and other marine life dont get cut by propellers

• 
  @marguskiis77112 ай бұрын

  Propeller was really invented in middle ages Holland for windmills btw.

• 
  @holymagg3 ай бұрын

  How was the titanics engines tirple expansion with 4 pistons? Its quite a stretch to say they are identical.

• 
  @user-ri3ob1ro5o3 ай бұрын

  Sunt Gabriel SĂNDIȚĂ.pasionatorul de corăbii 😮.

• 
  @melisa4653 ай бұрын

  Excellent video! ❤️

• 
  @DeepakSharma-ci9hi3 ай бұрын

  Nice video

• 
  @user-yr4ii4su1v5 ай бұрын

  Algae in the water: Oh, this is my client!

• 
  @deepbludude46975 ай бұрын

  I lived on Ascension Island where WD spent what was probably a pretty miserable time.

• 
  @Will466665 ай бұрын

  Interesting. It’s difficult to get to the truth about the Titanic, but always good to hear real information from the inquiry.

• 
  @Spartacus-42975 ай бұрын

  The titanic took hours to sink most people had sunk due to hypothermia within 25 minutes of entering the water. By the time she had sunk anyone still in the water was already dead.

• 
  @PeteH01215 ай бұрын

  Apart from that lady it seems...

• 
  @Spartacus-42975 ай бұрын

  ​@@PeteH0121 the woman testifying was in a lifeboat the entire time. And Rose the woman who was found on the door was out of the water on the door meaning she wasn't treading water using energy to keep afloat. That excess energy was used by her body to keep her core temperature warmer than had she been in the water.

• 
  @PeteH01215 ай бұрын

  @@Spartacus-4297 Two very lucky people (relatively)

• 
  @Spartacus-42975 ай бұрын

  @@PeteH0121 indeed.

• 
  @seekingabsolution19075 ай бұрын

  Sinking ships displace so much water that they create a suction effect. Dragging smaller things around them into the depths. Add that to the freezing temperatures of the water. It is feasible that anyone still alive after the ship sank was too weak to cry out.

• 
  @johncina6215 ай бұрын

  NICELY EXPLAINED, WELL DONEE❤❤

• 
  @tylermcneill5 ай бұрын

  🎉

• 
  @Whiteshirtloosetie5 ай бұрын

  That is one seriously incredible model of a truly mind blowing ship.

• 
  @131alexa5 ай бұрын

  Nice clear animations 👍

• 
  @Firemarioflower5 ай бұрын

  3:09 But Collapsible A sank..... oh well, she was found anyway

• 
  @desantotony775 ай бұрын

  Where do l get this 3D file?!😢

• 
  @GallagherGeotecminning6 ай бұрын

  BRILLIANT

• 
  @craigmulcahy6 ай бұрын

  This is fantastic!

• 
  @MrMaddox576 ай бұрын

  And it would take the joy away from exploration and discovery, but maybe they should look into Sat. technology that can see ALL of underwater items, ruins, hahaha. Probably will become real one day, if not already (government probably has the capabilities but is still classified. Probably MANY crazy technologies the public does NOT know about).

• 
  @MrMaddox576 ай бұрын

  totally amazing. Might have been completely destroyed by now, the ruins, that is. Maybe they will find it FROZEN in the Antarctica one day, would be epic if completely intact, though doubtful. Big wave and washing the ruins far away does indeed seem probable. Whirlpool idea is an interesting one, there are probably even CONSPIRACY theories about the ship by now, lol. Even extreme ones.

• 
  @vijaysurada13396 ай бұрын

  Brilliant explanation

• 
  @jonkayl94166 ай бұрын

  Typical. Money and vested interest coupled with curruption and greed (in short stupidity). BP, Shell. Look out.

• 
  @Guaterson6 ай бұрын

  4:49 WHAT?

• 
  @adrienvellacott59427 ай бұрын

  You may have seen this or similar. I have a yearning!

• 
  @captlurch7 ай бұрын

  I’ve never agreed with the much stated remark that the clipper ship was the zenith of sailing ships. While they were sleek, the sail plans required large crews, they lacked cargo capacity & therefore limited to high value cargo. The iron & later steel hulled ships, especially after 1870 were far superior in capacity and many could match the clippers in speed. Innovations such as the Jarvis Brace Winch allowed smaller crews to handle bigger sail plans. Ship designs like Prëussen, Potosi, Herzogin Cecilie showed that sail was still an efficient means of transport. There was still plenty of room for innovation. Where all sailing vessels fell short compared with steam ships was in port operations. Small hatches reduced access & speed of cargo ops. The low freeboard when loaded was partly to blame for the small hatches, since decks could be awash in foul weather. All steel hatch covers as we have now could have helped. The need by most of the square riggers to use solid ballast, such as sand or stone instead of water, also greatly extended the time in port. They could have easily had ballast tanks but owners were typically cheap (still are) & chose not to build them into the design. This was rather short sighted.

• 
  @markiliff7 ай бұрын

  I was an adult during The Falklands and I found this absolutely fascinating. Thank you. (But *please* lose the on-screen dancing doodads if you do something like this again.)

• 
  @user-si8eh7gb7u7 ай бұрын

  Dredging refugees.

• 
  @user-si8eh7gb7u7 ай бұрын

  Dredging NOT climate change.

• 
  @vitusthemad30437 ай бұрын

  Thank you . I was searching high and low for an animation that made sense of this engagement.

• 
  @SkibidiGman-not-playing-roblox7 ай бұрын

  the propellers aren't the same

• 
  @sibelsezer78297 ай бұрын

  I'm experiencing exam stress, listening to your voice calms me down, thank you.❤❤❤

• 
  @sibelsezer78297 ай бұрын

  It's so good to hear your voice this morning.❤❤❤

• 
  @sibelsezer78298 ай бұрын

  Only you speak...let the world listen ❤❤❤

• 
  @tedsinclair45568 ай бұрын

  It skips the description of the furnace with the firebar arrangement and the ash door.

• 
  @mariuszszymczak36448 ай бұрын

  Love it!

• 
  @quentlusk61788 ай бұрын

  Fantastic.

• 
  @Happy118078 ай бұрын

  HAVE TO LAUGH WHEN YOU TRY TO COMPARE BRITISH CARRIERS in EARLY 40’s to Japanese!WITH THE NON EXISTENT BRITISH CARRIER AIRCRAFT. 2 Japanese carriers could have sunk the entire British NAVY!

• 
  @kaiten-2 ай бұрын

  they can because British AA are no different with Japanese AA .

• 
  @ginestraginestra96248 ай бұрын

  Very interesting and inspiring

• 
  @user-pk1oh8do4j8 ай бұрын

  Thh]ere are at least 2 active in New Zealand, Nelson and Auckland.

• 
  @orphanoforbit75889 ай бұрын

  Essentially, an utterly pointless task. Nice music though.

• 
  @luciobricks67999 ай бұрын

  Beautiful video!