I think this car is the best price performance for the money I seen deals around 27000 in my area maybe I get one with performance package
@osomeric327711 күн бұрын
Wheels my guy i need the wheels
@EUROCOMPULSION10 күн бұрын
Avant Garde man, we can get them for you.
@andrascseh302621 күн бұрын
What downpipe and exhaust?
@c43sedan24 күн бұрын
Do i need to find what the total boost of my car is supposed to be and half that since its only one of the turbos?
@FrignSkooter27 күн бұрын
Can I use it if I've already gotten a tune from a small business? Like, can I reset it to stock if it already has a different tune?
@Dr.reese_UBR328 күн бұрын
Does this work for 2020 Guilias?
@EUROCOMPULSION27 күн бұрын
Absolutely, yes.
@WarPigRSАй бұрын
Does the ecoboost have octane learning? Would it benefit from 93, E30 or even E50 on stock fuel system?
@dougsteele51042 ай бұрын
Woo how just waiting for my tuned file
@sal33n2 ай бұрын
Will this work/fit in a Stelvio? You only specify the Giulia and I know that many things work/fit on both. If not are you going to make one that will?
@EUROCOMPULSION2 ай бұрын
Yes, it will definitely work on a Stelvio for sure. Most if not all the performance related parts are interchangeable between the Giulia and Stelvio.
@myrieke13 ай бұрын
wow im sorry but this makes me sad because i had one and i love the italian feel that came with it.
@panglingaow3 ай бұрын
Since you tested the performance package with a 3.55 will the will the base model 3.15 without the performance package be less torquey?
@UTPGIO3 ай бұрын
any tutorial how to remove the original one
@anirbano3 ай бұрын
Does not sound good under 4000 rom at all. Did not like the startup, idle, mild acceleration. Was considering getting this for a relatively cheap upgrade but now really not sure..
@nerisalvarado78923 ай бұрын
let me know when the tunes drop and imma be there i got the 2024 so i will need it
@panglingaow27 күн бұрын
Me too!
@Bilf563 ай бұрын
Please get some 1/4 mile times!
@dougsteele51044 ай бұрын
What’s your lighting guy sick that day? Why is it so dark?
@mavr1ck8534 ай бұрын
Can i upgrade from the v2?
@sheldor7804 ай бұрын
Dont buy anything. Bunch of amateurs and lyers. Got a ecu that didnt work. Send it back a year ago. They dont answer theyre mails and if they do after months of waiting they lie to you. I cant recomend these amateurs to anyone.
@sheldor7804 ай бұрын
Dont buy anything. Bunch of amateurs and lyers. Got a ecu that didnt work. Send it back a year ago. They dont answer theyre mails and if they do after months of waiting they lie to you. I cant recomend these amateurs to anyone.
@ryandyson53984 ай бұрын
You did not do dragstrip though I’d bet another 10 hp
@EUROCOMPULSION4 ай бұрын
No extra power in Drag mode (not anymore than would be in Track mode), which is why we didn't publish that test. The Drag mode changes have more to do with throttle response and shift mapping, steering, torque reserve, etc. No real changes to peak torque and power for the purposes of this kind of testing. Now if we were at the drag strip, it's possible drag mode would produce the best results because of the changes outlined.
@FunkyBananaBear4 ай бұрын
@EUROCOMPULSION Every time I've run my 2020 or 2021 Ecoboost in drag mode, I've never gotten good results. Just straight sport mode with traction control off has always been given me the best. Any reason why? I'd say I'm no expert in drag racing lol. And it's just a brand new perfectly flat side street im driving on.
@vincentcrifasi16905 ай бұрын
Throw the whole car away
@Cowboyking124 ай бұрын
Probably outrun your Chevy bolt
@cars.withdave5 ай бұрын
Your first problem is no V8, nice job though
@1state1525 ай бұрын
769..00 lmao this is more than most german performance cars. The premium payed on this is nuts. this intake at best should be in the sub 500 dollar range. 420-450 would be more reasonable for this unless there’s parts of silver and gold on this thing too lol. please elaborate on why the cost is this cost lol
@Dr.reese_UBR328 күн бұрын
This is a ram air intake, different from a normal intake. They offer some for 500$ but those don’t use cold air, just boxed temp. That’s because you have to get rid of the stock intake tube that feeds the air intake. This one is designed to fit with oem air duct, and provides a longer filter instead, hence the “v4” just means their latest design. You can still buy old design, but on paper this type of intake actually provides improved efficiency and performance, 800 is pretty entry level considering it’s a 40-50k new car. Picked one up for 22k with only 23k miles. Next is turbo upgrade!
@1state15228 күн бұрын
@@Dr.reese_UBR3 i understand the difference between a true cold air and a ram hot box. This intake is identical to the previous minus the housing but then again it’s only a matter of time before this material surrounding the filter gets hot being so close to the engine still and begins to heat soak. again 800 bucks is not entry level by any means when 90 percent of the highest branded intakes for my m4 range from 4-600 and the m4 is actually worth the money u stated. 800 for a guilia not even a qv is not worth it. guilias can be found anywhere from 20-35k almost brand new. those cars make crap for power and 800 bucks will net u next to nothing.
@Dr.reese_UBR328 күн бұрын
@@1state152 it will still beat 85% of the cars on the road, as for track…. Maybe 5% 😂 also this engine isn’t producing the amount of heat you think it is… have you seen them up close? There’s almost a full arm length from the radiator to the front on the intake… it’s not the v6 one. That one basically has no space in the engine bay, this is fully enclosed and will definitely be cooler than stock abs plastic
@Cgee35 ай бұрын
Your final dyno numbers dont add up. It seems that you applied a 15% drivetrain loss for 261 whp to equal 307 flywheel hp. For the torque rating, it seems like you used only a 10% loss for 325 wtq to equal to equal 360 flywheel torque. A 15% loss equation for 325 wtq would to equate to 382 flywheel torque.
@EUROCOMPULSION5 ай бұрын
First off, we didn't apply any loss corrections. The dyno reads the dissipation (drive train loss) for a given gear, and applies the correction it detects at any given moment. We explained that in the video, but what you're seeing is what the dyno detected. Secondly, drivetrain loss is not necessarily a fixed # across the power band (I don't know if people know this or not). Dissipation is linear in nature, and dependent upon the gear, rpm/speed/load, and the amount of power generated at a given rpm/moment in the powerband. A peak drivetrain loss happens near peak power and near the upper part of the powerband, depending on gear and speed. At a lower rpm/speed, the dissipation is not as high (for example, where you would see peak torque occurring or just before). The dyno detects and measures the resistance through the powertrain going from redline back to below the starting rpm for the dyno run. Resistance/dissipation is less at that point in the power band. Again, mentioned in the video, this is why we don't solely go off of the flywheel hp data. There are too many variables involved, it's only a small part of the bigger picture. We only show them at the end so everyone else can see them. EDIT: Look at the WHP charts in the video, the lines at the bottom show the dissipation reading throughout the run.
@QuangusFr5 ай бұрын
mine pops sometimes without the throttle tap, especially during a cold start
@AutobotLeader_16 ай бұрын
Is it true the ecoboost mustang 2024 takes less gas?
@EUROCOMPULSION5 ай бұрын
Honestly, I haven't paid attention to that at all. I will check and see the next time we fill up.
@Hersses-tech5 ай бұрын
If you talking about fuel economy is the same I have a 2023 before and now 2024 my new is making 21 by gallons with only 350 miles in odometer, my old 2023 mark 22.3 miles by gallons .
@EUROCOMPULSION5 ай бұрын
@@Hersses-tech I have noticed that the 2024 runs a bit richer for longer across the middle to top end of the powerband.
@josh_motorsports85216 ай бұрын
Is the car also on a tune ?
@EUROCOMPULSION6 ай бұрын
Yes, it has our tune as well.
@peterjd.w7946 ай бұрын
Thank you for your video show. I understand. Great Video 👍
@AgeofEon6 ай бұрын
Hello, I like the sound of the atmospheric BoV and I'm interested in upgrading the OEM ones on my '18 QV. Is there any performance change (good or bad) when going to an atmospheric setup over recirc? Any codes or issues? Thank you!
@tomislavknezovic17 ай бұрын
I would like to know when the engine is off is the westgate open or closed? and in what position is he when the engine is on and how it continues to work when I add a lot of gas. my engine lost power when I accelerate after 2 thousand revolutions, I don't go into save mode and the diagnostics dont report errors. I get acceleration but very slowly, like I don't have turbine. Sorry for my english i hope you understand my question, thanks
@Reptile789Ай бұрын
It should be in the closed position when the engine is off. It should only open when the pressure that it is meant to open at is met.
@bobanvukovic4187 ай бұрын
Nicely explained. Does anyone know if crack pressure is the same on smaller multiair turbo variant GT1238Z. Thank you
@dipndalip8 ай бұрын
such an ugly interior and its no muscle car with a 4 cylinder
@michaelfried31237 ай бұрын
Your mom is calling you kid, shut off your xbox and wash up!
@EUROCOMPULSION7 ай бұрын
Thank you for taking the time to comment and tell us your thoughts 🙃
@ProjectFairmont5 ай бұрын
Style is subjective, and nobody ever claimed the Mustang EB is a muscle car. If you like 200 less pounds on the nose for better handling, yet appreciate the strong S550/S650 chassis…
@FunkyBananaBear4 ай бұрын
Muscle is in the exterior style first and foremost imo. The rest about cars is just so damn hard to objectify. They have V8s in NON-muscle cars all over, so that's not a great way to value it.
@mybass80388 ай бұрын
nice license plate
@radicalgamer26349 ай бұрын
I have a 2013 v6 is it worth getting this instead?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
My personal opinion is yes. I think the S650 has a better base platform to build off for performance, and just superior drivability. It's fantastic to drive. I would say both the Ecoboost and the GT are better options than the V6 (overall, all things considered). You really cannot go wrong with either one. I wasn't expecting such a huge difference between my 2018 and the 2024, it was a bit surprising how much better the 2024 is. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the V6, it has its place, but worth upgrading? Definitely.
@namir919 ай бұрын
cool promo video but like... no intake sound, terrible lighting, can't really tell where the ram air is supposed ot be and the box the air filter is in is restricted by that tiny opening?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
It's probably hard to tell without seeing it in person (and holding it in your hands) but the filter and canister are huge. They aren't tiny openings, they're about 4 inches in diameter. The canister design is as such that it allows the air to swirl through the box, gaining velocity. This thing is anything but short on air flow. The ram air piece connects directly at the factory ram air duct inlet at the front of the car, go to the link in the description, you can see photos off the car in technical section. There's no sound clips because there isn't much, the entire thing is sealed. This is why we have the V2 intake, for people that care about sound, the V4 is for people who want max performance (regardless of sound).
@ohh4889 ай бұрын
Does it have paddle shifters
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
Yes, it does. And they work well (shifting is faster and better than the previous gen 10speed cars).
@Whigaro5 ай бұрын
No
@non-binaryunicorn53029 ай бұрын
Why didn’t you test drag strip mode? That’s what everyone’s getting 4.5 second 0-60’s on. Would’ve been very interesting to see the difference. Also, if I live in Las Vegas, do you see only having access to 91 octane as a big performance difference from 93? Thanks
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
No, I think that the car will perform just fine on 91, the primary issue is cooling. Front bumper is off and the intercooler just isn't large enough to handle what the car is truly capable of, similar to the previous generation. Keep the temps down, upgraded intercooler and all of sudden a whole new world of performance opens up, even on 91 octane. Didn't test Drag Strip mode for the dyno, because the majority of the changes in Drag Strip mode are down to throttle masking, drivability masking, and transmission characteristics. The car is faster in that mode over a series of gears and rpm ranges, not through a single gear pull like we would be doing on the dyno. You can expect the tuning parameters in Track mode to be similar to Drag mode, being familiar with the ECU and tuning, and the previous generation ecoboosts ECUs, that's how they have always done it and seem to be doing it on this generation as well. So a dyno of Drag Strip mode over a 1 gear pull would not have yielded anything much different than you see in track mode.
@michaelfried31237 ай бұрын
Those 4.5 numbers are a hoax. I'm seeing real world numbers on the OE tire more in the low 5's.
@panglingaowАй бұрын
It's not a hoax I got 4.64 in my 24 EcoBoost I will post it soon but go to my page I have a video getting 4.72 @@michaelfried3123
@theonemacduff9 ай бұрын
Really hard to see the readouts on my laptop. Did you consider making it bigger and placing it at top right?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
There's a link in the video description to our dyno database on our site. You can see the charts really big there if these are difficult to see in the video.
@jaym80279 ай бұрын
Over 100hp/liter at the wheels! That's better than my S550 GT by a long shot. I do love the Coyote motor, though.
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
I hear you, there's nothing quite like a V8 sound at full tilt! But Ford definitely didn't overlook this engine setup, even though it's technically the base model now. It's very solid and performs well.
@YktdPillsbury9 ай бұрын
Throw a turbo on the coyote and watch it make 150hp per liter
@GoGoggansGo7 ай бұрын
100 hp per liter ain’t shit and these numbers aren’t impressive by any means
@danny30canes2 ай бұрын
@@GoGoggansGo compared to the CTR, GTI, and SI it is and cheaper 🤡🤡
@Lifeof7289 ай бұрын
Seems like torque carries out further up the rev range than the previous gen while still having that low spool. Nice
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
Definitely, and you can feel it while driving on the road, it's a noticeable difference. The torque is more linear and smooth, especially in the midrange. They aren't dumping fuel as early in the rpm range as they did on the previous gen, and there's a bit more peak boost as well, so that may be contributing.
@M4B21S889 ай бұрын
Is this run with 93 octane ?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
We ran with 91 octane on these runs, that's the most common premium around us (with exception to one station I know of that has 93 octane). We mention this in the full dyno video, which I will link below. kzread.info/dash/bejne/l5holq6noty7g9Y.html
@jpcaspers89519 ай бұрын
Do you think 93 octane would be good for living in FL?
@arno73039 ай бұрын
93 in turbo cars will always give better results, the hotter the climate the higher octane really as it is prone to pre-ignite with lower octane fuels
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles9 ай бұрын
I'm sure Toby will dyno it on 93 so real data will be coming. My guess is that under high heat conditions 93 will be a little better but in normal temps, like 80F and below I doubt it will matter much .
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
Yes, as someone else mentioned, the hotter the climate and higher humidity, higher octane will always yield more knock protection and more consistent performance on a turbocharged car. Below 75F and the comparison will be only slightly different, but it definitely makes a difference in certain conditions. We will likely do some testing on 93 octane as well, but I always start tune development on 91 octane, as that is usually the minimum premium anyone has access to, and by doing this I can ensure it runs safely on the minimum required octane.
@killer1963daddy9 ай бұрын
I'd add 4 more cylds......
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
Well they've got the GT for that.
@arno73039 ай бұрын
so original lol
@WillHughesTV9 ай бұрын
Americompulsion?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
We'll call it 'Murca Division
@WillHughesTV9 ай бұрын
@@EUROCOMPULSION What the F#%@ is a Kilometer!!
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
@@WillHughesTV 🤣There are many things I can appreciate about the metric system...the kilometer is not one of them.
@Ilovegirlfights22 ай бұрын
Have the Ecms been unlocked yet?
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles9 ай бұрын
First :) Thanks Toby, that was well done.
@ThomisticAmerican13FOX9 ай бұрын
2021 Mach 1 owner here, Great explanation regarding your dyno specifics. Greg if you are interested in 4 cylinder Mustangs, the previous generations HPP Ecoboost with the 2.3L 330hp 350tq seems like a pretty cool car.
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles9 ай бұрын
@ThomisticAmerican13FOX Thanks Thomas, we already have a 2018 and a 2024, I do like the cars. Our 2018 has quite a bit more power than stock, but it's Toby's job to talk about that when the time is right @@ThomisticAmerican13FOX
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles10 ай бұрын
Well done video guys, I think it looks great.
@thetyz0810 ай бұрын
Where can I get that rear diffuser🔥?!
@whotfisog436210 ай бұрын
link is in the bio
@chrisbreezy302410 ай бұрын
Wheres the diffuser from?
@EUROCOMPULSION9 ай бұрын
We had it custom fabricated. So it's a one off.
@valeriobertucci615910 ай бұрын
i have 4c....waiting the mechanics doing the job....downpipe, new bigger intercooler, light wiegh pulleys, central exit exhaust, new reinforced clutch, tcm and ecm remap. Next steps: pistons, rods, bigger turbo, then full carbon body
@marianadm432010 ай бұрын
fiat punto evo 1.4. i've shortened it by 6 full turns. will that be bad for the turbo/car?
Пікірлер
I think this car is the best price performance for the money I seen deals around 27000 in my area maybe I get one with performance package
Wheels my guy i need the wheels
Avant Garde man, we can get them for you.
What downpipe and exhaust?
Do i need to find what the total boost of my car is supposed to be and half that since its only one of the turbos?
Can I use it if I've already gotten a tune from a small business? Like, can I reset it to stock if it already has a different tune?
Does this work for 2020 Guilias?
Absolutely, yes.
Does the ecoboost have octane learning? Would it benefit from 93, E30 or even E50 on stock fuel system?
Woo how just waiting for my tuned file
Will this work/fit in a Stelvio? You only specify the Giulia and I know that many things work/fit on both. If not are you going to make one that will?
Yes, it will definitely work on a Stelvio for sure. Most if not all the performance related parts are interchangeable between the Giulia and Stelvio.
wow im sorry but this makes me sad because i had one and i love the italian feel that came with it.
Since you tested the performance package with a 3.55 will the will the base model 3.15 without the performance package be less torquey?
any tutorial how to remove the original one
Does not sound good under 4000 rom at all. Did not like the startup, idle, mild acceleration. Was considering getting this for a relatively cheap upgrade but now really not sure..
let me know when the tunes drop and imma be there i got the 2024 so i will need it
Me too!
Please get some 1/4 mile times!
What’s your lighting guy sick that day? Why is it so dark?
Can i upgrade from the v2?
Dont buy anything. Bunch of amateurs and lyers. Got a ecu that didnt work. Send it back a year ago. They dont answer theyre mails and if they do after months of waiting they lie to you. I cant recomend these amateurs to anyone.
Dont buy anything. Bunch of amateurs and lyers. Got a ecu that didnt work. Send it back a year ago. They dont answer theyre mails and if they do after months of waiting they lie to you. I cant recomend these amateurs to anyone.
You did not do dragstrip though I’d bet another 10 hp
No extra power in Drag mode (not anymore than would be in Track mode), which is why we didn't publish that test. The Drag mode changes have more to do with throttle response and shift mapping, steering, torque reserve, etc. No real changes to peak torque and power for the purposes of this kind of testing. Now if we were at the drag strip, it's possible drag mode would produce the best results because of the changes outlined.
@EUROCOMPULSION Every time I've run my 2020 or 2021 Ecoboost in drag mode, I've never gotten good results. Just straight sport mode with traction control off has always been given me the best. Any reason why? I'd say I'm no expert in drag racing lol. And it's just a brand new perfectly flat side street im driving on.
Throw the whole car away
Probably outrun your Chevy bolt
Your first problem is no V8, nice job though
769..00 lmao this is more than most german performance cars. The premium payed on this is nuts. this intake at best should be in the sub 500 dollar range. 420-450 would be more reasonable for this unless there’s parts of silver and gold on this thing too lol. please elaborate on why the cost is this cost lol
This is a ram air intake, different from a normal intake. They offer some for 500$ but those don’t use cold air, just boxed temp. That’s because you have to get rid of the stock intake tube that feeds the air intake. This one is designed to fit with oem air duct, and provides a longer filter instead, hence the “v4” just means their latest design. You can still buy old design, but on paper this type of intake actually provides improved efficiency and performance, 800 is pretty entry level considering it’s a 40-50k new car. Picked one up for 22k with only 23k miles. Next is turbo upgrade!
@@Dr.reese_UBR3 i understand the difference between a true cold air and a ram hot box. This intake is identical to the previous minus the housing but then again it’s only a matter of time before this material surrounding the filter gets hot being so close to the engine still and begins to heat soak. again 800 bucks is not entry level by any means when 90 percent of the highest branded intakes for my m4 range from 4-600 and the m4 is actually worth the money u stated. 800 for a guilia not even a qv is not worth it. guilias can be found anywhere from 20-35k almost brand new. those cars make crap for power and 800 bucks will net u next to nothing.
@@1state152 it will still beat 85% of the cars on the road, as for track…. Maybe 5% 😂 also this engine isn’t producing the amount of heat you think it is… have you seen them up close? There’s almost a full arm length from the radiator to the front on the intake… it’s not the v6 one. That one basically has no space in the engine bay, this is fully enclosed and will definitely be cooler than stock abs plastic
Your final dyno numbers dont add up. It seems that you applied a 15% drivetrain loss for 261 whp to equal 307 flywheel hp. For the torque rating, it seems like you used only a 10% loss for 325 wtq to equal to equal 360 flywheel torque. A 15% loss equation for 325 wtq would to equate to 382 flywheel torque.
First off, we didn't apply any loss corrections. The dyno reads the dissipation (drive train loss) for a given gear, and applies the correction it detects at any given moment. We explained that in the video, but what you're seeing is what the dyno detected. Secondly, drivetrain loss is not necessarily a fixed # across the power band (I don't know if people know this or not). Dissipation is linear in nature, and dependent upon the gear, rpm/speed/load, and the amount of power generated at a given rpm/moment in the powerband. A peak drivetrain loss happens near peak power and near the upper part of the powerband, depending on gear and speed. At a lower rpm/speed, the dissipation is not as high (for example, where you would see peak torque occurring or just before). The dyno detects and measures the resistance through the powertrain going from redline back to below the starting rpm for the dyno run. Resistance/dissipation is less at that point in the power band. Again, mentioned in the video, this is why we don't solely go off of the flywheel hp data. There are too many variables involved, it's only a small part of the bigger picture. We only show them at the end so everyone else can see them. EDIT: Look at the WHP charts in the video, the lines at the bottom show the dissipation reading throughout the run.
mine pops sometimes without the throttle tap, especially during a cold start
Is it true the ecoboost mustang 2024 takes less gas?
Honestly, I haven't paid attention to that at all. I will check and see the next time we fill up.
If you talking about fuel economy is the same I have a 2023 before and now 2024 my new is making 21 by gallons with only 350 miles in odometer, my old 2023 mark 22.3 miles by gallons .
@@Hersses-tech I have noticed that the 2024 runs a bit richer for longer across the middle to top end of the powerband.
Is the car also on a tune ?
Yes, it has our tune as well.
Thank you for your video show. I understand. Great Video 👍
Hello, I like the sound of the atmospheric BoV and I'm interested in upgrading the OEM ones on my '18 QV. Is there any performance change (good or bad) when going to an atmospheric setup over recirc? Any codes or issues? Thank you!
I would like to know when the engine is off is the westgate open or closed? and in what position is he when the engine is on and how it continues to work when I add a lot of gas. my engine lost power when I accelerate after 2 thousand revolutions, I don't go into save mode and the diagnostics dont report errors. I get acceleration but very slowly, like I don't have turbine. Sorry for my english i hope you understand my question, thanks
It should be in the closed position when the engine is off. It should only open when the pressure that it is meant to open at is met.
Nicely explained. Does anyone know if crack pressure is the same on smaller multiair turbo variant GT1238Z. Thank you
such an ugly interior and its no muscle car with a 4 cylinder
Your mom is calling you kid, shut off your xbox and wash up!
Thank you for taking the time to comment and tell us your thoughts 🙃
Style is subjective, and nobody ever claimed the Mustang EB is a muscle car. If you like 200 less pounds on the nose for better handling, yet appreciate the strong S550/S650 chassis…
Muscle is in the exterior style first and foremost imo. The rest about cars is just so damn hard to objectify. They have V8s in NON-muscle cars all over, so that's not a great way to value it.
nice license plate
I have a 2013 v6 is it worth getting this instead?
My personal opinion is yes. I think the S650 has a better base platform to build off for performance, and just superior drivability. It's fantastic to drive. I would say both the Ecoboost and the GT are better options than the V6 (overall, all things considered). You really cannot go wrong with either one. I wasn't expecting such a huge difference between my 2018 and the 2024, it was a bit surprising how much better the 2024 is. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the V6, it has its place, but worth upgrading? Definitely.
cool promo video but like... no intake sound, terrible lighting, can't really tell where the ram air is supposed ot be and the box the air filter is in is restricted by that tiny opening?
It's probably hard to tell without seeing it in person (and holding it in your hands) but the filter and canister are huge. They aren't tiny openings, they're about 4 inches in diameter. The canister design is as such that it allows the air to swirl through the box, gaining velocity. This thing is anything but short on air flow. The ram air piece connects directly at the factory ram air duct inlet at the front of the car, go to the link in the description, you can see photos off the car in technical section. There's no sound clips because there isn't much, the entire thing is sealed. This is why we have the V2 intake, for people that care about sound, the V4 is for people who want max performance (regardless of sound).
Does it have paddle shifters
Yes, it does. And they work well (shifting is faster and better than the previous gen 10speed cars).
No
Why didn’t you test drag strip mode? That’s what everyone’s getting 4.5 second 0-60’s on. Would’ve been very interesting to see the difference. Also, if I live in Las Vegas, do you see only having access to 91 octane as a big performance difference from 93? Thanks
No, I think that the car will perform just fine on 91, the primary issue is cooling. Front bumper is off and the intercooler just isn't large enough to handle what the car is truly capable of, similar to the previous generation. Keep the temps down, upgraded intercooler and all of sudden a whole new world of performance opens up, even on 91 octane. Didn't test Drag Strip mode for the dyno, because the majority of the changes in Drag Strip mode are down to throttle masking, drivability masking, and transmission characteristics. The car is faster in that mode over a series of gears and rpm ranges, not through a single gear pull like we would be doing on the dyno. You can expect the tuning parameters in Track mode to be similar to Drag mode, being familiar with the ECU and tuning, and the previous generation ecoboosts ECUs, that's how they have always done it and seem to be doing it on this generation as well. So a dyno of Drag Strip mode over a 1 gear pull would not have yielded anything much different than you see in track mode.
Those 4.5 numbers are a hoax. I'm seeing real world numbers on the OE tire more in the low 5's.
It's not a hoax I got 4.64 in my 24 EcoBoost I will post it soon but go to my page I have a video getting 4.72 @@michaelfried3123
Really hard to see the readouts on my laptop. Did you consider making it bigger and placing it at top right?
There's a link in the video description to our dyno database on our site. You can see the charts really big there if these are difficult to see in the video.
Over 100hp/liter at the wheels! That's better than my S550 GT by a long shot. I do love the Coyote motor, though.
I hear you, there's nothing quite like a V8 sound at full tilt! But Ford definitely didn't overlook this engine setup, even though it's technically the base model now. It's very solid and performs well.
Throw a turbo on the coyote and watch it make 150hp per liter
100 hp per liter ain’t shit and these numbers aren’t impressive by any means
@@GoGoggansGo compared to the CTR, GTI, and SI it is and cheaper 🤡🤡
Seems like torque carries out further up the rev range than the previous gen while still having that low spool. Nice
Definitely, and you can feel it while driving on the road, it's a noticeable difference. The torque is more linear and smooth, especially in the midrange. They aren't dumping fuel as early in the rpm range as they did on the previous gen, and there's a bit more peak boost as well, so that may be contributing.
Is this run with 93 octane ?
We ran with 91 octane on these runs, that's the most common premium around us (with exception to one station I know of that has 93 octane). We mention this in the full dyno video, which I will link below. kzread.info/dash/bejne/l5holq6noty7g9Y.html
Do you think 93 octane would be good for living in FL?
93 in turbo cars will always give better results, the hotter the climate the higher octane really as it is prone to pre-ignite with lower octane fuels
I'm sure Toby will dyno it on 93 so real data will be coming. My guess is that under high heat conditions 93 will be a little better but in normal temps, like 80F and below I doubt it will matter much .
Yes, as someone else mentioned, the hotter the climate and higher humidity, higher octane will always yield more knock protection and more consistent performance on a turbocharged car. Below 75F and the comparison will be only slightly different, but it definitely makes a difference in certain conditions. We will likely do some testing on 93 octane as well, but I always start tune development on 91 octane, as that is usually the minimum premium anyone has access to, and by doing this I can ensure it runs safely on the minimum required octane.
I'd add 4 more cylds......
Well they've got the GT for that.
so original lol
Americompulsion?
We'll call it 'Murca Division
@@EUROCOMPULSION What the F#%@ is a Kilometer!!
@@WillHughesTV 🤣There are many things I can appreciate about the metric system...the kilometer is not one of them.
Have the Ecms been unlocked yet?
First :) Thanks Toby, that was well done.
2021 Mach 1 owner here, Great explanation regarding your dyno specifics. Greg if you are interested in 4 cylinder Mustangs, the previous generations HPP Ecoboost with the 2.3L 330hp 350tq seems like a pretty cool car.
@ThomisticAmerican13FOX Thanks Thomas, we already have a 2018 and a 2024, I do like the cars. Our 2018 has quite a bit more power than stock, but it's Toby's job to talk about that when the time is right @@ThomisticAmerican13FOX
Well done video guys, I think it looks great.
Where can I get that rear diffuser🔥?!
link is in the bio
Wheres the diffuser from?
We had it custom fabricated. So it's a one off.
i have 4c....waiting the mechanics doing the job....downpipe, new bigger intercooler, light wiegh pulleys, central exit exhaust, new reinforced clutch, tcm and ecm remap. Next steps: pistons, rods, bigger turbo, then full carbon body
fiat punto evo 1.4. i've shortened it by 6 full turns. will that be bad for the turbo/car?