Patricia Jenkinson

Patricia Jenkinson

This channel focuses on communication-related concepts to accompany various communication courses: Public Speaking, Argumentation & Debate, Communication Experience, Interpersonal Communication, Small Group Communication. The most recent addition is Mediated Oral Communication (oral communication and presentations via mediated channels such a KZread, video conferencing, etc.).
Additionally, concepts related to Survey Research are included.
(And, of course, the rare personal videos, or those that others have requested I create.)
I am a professor emeritus of Communication at Sacramento City College in California, as well as California State University, Sacramento. My experience is in both face-to-face and online teaching.
Additionally, I own a Communication Consulting business, Jenkinson Associates.

Cicero's Canons of Rhetoric

Cicero's Canons of Rhetoric

What is Rhetoric?

What is Rhetoric?

Why Use Captions in Videos?

Why Use Captions in Videos?

Present Like a Zoom Pro!

Present Like a Zoom Pro!

Self-Concept vs. Self-Esteem

Self-Concept vs. Self-Esteem

Empirical Research

Empirical Research

Hypotheses

Hypotheses

Types of Hypotheses

Types of Hypotheses

Sampling Error

Sampling Error

Types of Research Studies

Types of Research Studies

Пікірлер

  • @TeaBagOfChaos
    @TeaBagOfChaos3 күн бұрын

    Thank you, my rhetorics teacher forgot to explain the Delivery

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson2 күн бұрын

    That’s odd. Unless they were only focusing on written rhetoric. In public speaking, delivery is an important part of rhetoric.

  • @user-ig3el1qo9x
    @user-ig3el1qo9x10 күн бұрын

    ❤ thank you

  • @emead528
    @emead52827 күн бұрын

    Thank you for this. ❤

  • @sserwaddaderrick1523
    @sserwaddaderrick1523Ай бұрын

    The best 🎉

  • @newmanv4
    @newmanv4Ай бұрын

    Thank you so much, my cia part 3 test book is a mess but now everything is clear

  • @thedolphin5428
    @thedolphin5428Ай бұрын

    Aristotle annoys the sh*t out of me. He's such a persistent left-brainer, an OCD rationalist, a masculine, chauvanist thinker. He has no time for either right hemisphere intuition, nor dual hemisphere integrated realisation. The ancient Eastern philosophers and pundits were not solely logicians but took all modes of human perception as means towards truth. Modern Westerners falsely consider reasoning to be the highest human faculty of mind -- hence the elevation of sciences into religious canons. Sorry, but not true. Logic has its place, but rhetoric is not always the best tool of communication.

  • @mirosDV
    @mirosDV2 ай бұрын

    Thank you for the beautiful explanation

  • @RY-fe3rt
    @RY-fe3rt2 ай бұрын

    Long live parallel relationships! ✊ I unwittingly learned about how complimentary relationships function a few years ago. Growing up, my best friend and I were in a parallel relationship, except for the difference in our socio-economic backgrounds, which, like with most kids, wasn't an issue... at the time. My affluent friend was happy to lend me his stuff as often as he could and I was happy to borrow it. It didn't define the friendship... yet... Cut to: End of 9th grade, 1996. My parents bought me one of those swanky technical drawing sets for me to take the end of year exam with. You know the drill; T-square, drawing board, set squares etc. I knew I wouldn't be taking the subject beyond this point, but my best friend would. That year, for his birthday, I cleaned up the TD set (I'd only ever used it once) wrapped it in newspaper (couldn't afford wrapping paper but added a bunch of bougainvillea flowers from outside his gate where the bow would traditionally be 😂) and left it with his mother when it turned out he wasn't home. I never got to see him open it, but he loved it and for the last 3 years of highschool, it was always a source of pride for me to see him with it (even if his parents could afford to get him 10 more without batting an eye) because I'd never been able to give him anything as materially substantial before. And, of course, most of the other students relied on the school's old-fashioned wooden sets. Cut to: A few years ago, now both working adults, we were chatting idly and the TD set somehow came up. I was taken aback when he dismissively (and even irritably when contradicted ) insisted it had been a gift from his brother and not me. I didn't push the issue further but when I got home, I mulled it over for ages, part indignant, part amused and completely baffled. I recognized there was no malice in the mix up. The guy genuinely seemed to believe the gift had come from his brother and, more so, was very protective of this "memory". But why had he subconsciously transferred the association from me to his older sibling? I figured out complementary power dynamics were at play (even though I didn't know the term for them). Receiving the gift from me had, somewhere along the line, made him uncomfortable. It messed with our tried & tested dynamic where I was the borrower and he was the lender. I had unwittingly overstepped by making this gesture. I think recognizing this is part of the reason I didn't push back too much against his reimagined history. Plus it was so long ago, it seemed petty to bicker over. Cut to: Present day. The friendship has completely imploded because of an insistence by this now ex friend to, not only cling to this obsolete power dynamic between us, but also attempt to influence the dynamics between myself, my ex work colleagues, my friends (some of them exes too now) and even my family. He has flagrantly crossed the line and, I can only imagine, justifies it through our childhood friendship, even if it's disintegrated in adulthood for reasons I wont go into. I still can't imagine involving myself in his family's politics, especially behind his back, even in spite of how close I once was to them. Perhaps that's also a vestige of our past dynamic... and thank God for it! Moral of the story: interpersonal dynamics are as fascinating as they are precarious. NEVER involve yourself in other people's. It's impossible to fully grasp how two people's (nevermind a whole family's) rhythm works. Insinuating yourself into the rhythm is simply arrogant, naive, disruptive and often destructive. RIP Jason Turner. Rot In Purgatory, Ulcer Van Hermit. You both know who you are. PS: Thank goodness I'm still not a rich man. Can you imagine how much that would rub him the wrong way? 🙄🤡 #2341 #KnowYourPlace

  • @abedabubaker5860
    @abedabubaker58602 ай бұрын

    Best video EVER! Thanks for the help and I love your examples

  • @Radblur
    @Radblur2 ай бұрын

    Excellent dive into rhetoric, I think it's perfect as a 2nd visit to rhetoric, after a student initially understands the triangle more simply. This deeper dive reinforces the concepts well. Very clearly presented, with refined inventio, dispositio, and elocutio. :)

  • @pabloalves1732
    @pabloalves17322 ай бұрын

    good video

  • @telkomindonesia17
    @telkomindonesia172 ай бұрын

    ADUH ADUH ADUHHHHH

  • @intanfatmawati4481
    @intanfatmawati44812 ай бұрын

    Thanks you

  • @user-zg6jg8sr5h
    @user-zg6jg8sr5h2 ай бұрын

    thank you for this! it really helped me understand my statistics notes more

  • @rinisartika275
    @rinisartika2752 ай бұрын

    Thank you for sharing this very information video

  • @RiniWahyuni-qr9ff
    @RiniWahyuni-qr9ff2 ай бұрын

    thanks for sharing this very information video

  • @TheMitchRacePodcast
    @TheMitchRacePodcast2 ай бұрын

    This is a Great video Patricia! Well summarized and very clear. Thank you!

  • @22-twentytwo
    @22-twentytwo3 ай бұрын

    I tried to find about Aristotle 9 feelings and didn't find anything about it at the media. I would love to get the source\link of this theory.

  • @margaretwatkins7008
    @margaretwatkins70083 ай бұрын

    Im confused. The null supposed to be accepted because the r is greater than the p value. Please correct me.

  • @patienceowusuwiredu375
    @patienceowusuwiredu3753 ай бұрын

    Thank you.

  • @hgriff14
    @hgriff144 ай бұрын

    1 in 2 marriages ending in divorce has nothing to do with what will happen in the future because the statistic is about historical data. this is nonsense.

  • @MisheckKazembe-hv4nc
    @MisheckKazembe-hv4nc4 ай бұрын

    You are a great teacher 🔥🔥🔥. Only 14 minutes, very beneficial

  • @MisheckKazembe-hv4nc
    @MisheckKazembe-hv4nc4 ай бұрын

    You are a great teacher 🔥🔥🔥. Only 14 minutes, very beneficial

  • @nelisiwemarcia2274
    @nelisiwemarcia22744 ай бұрын

    I was here for the bread!!

  • @user-wp4pi3ef2b
    @user-wp4pi3ef2b4 ай бұрын

    Can you help me to find where in Aristotles' work he talks about the 3 proofs? I can't find it anywhere!

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson4 ай бұрын

    The Rhetoric. Do a Google search and it should come up. www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/Aristotle-rhetoric.pdf

  • @Fireis_bests
    @Fireis_bests4 ай бұрын

    My report has been helped for school

  • @elkincarmona5846
    @elkincarmona58465 ай бұрын

    Fantastic video. lots of useful insights

  • @yuvarajRChemEMS-
    @yuvarajRChemEMS-5 ай бұрын

    You said we rejected r=0.62 then it means more time you spent to study the less mark u will get right

  • @joshuafritz1386
    @joshuafritz13865 ай бұрын

    This is incorrect. Sophists were not teaching philosophy. Rather, they were obscuring it. D minus.

  • @TheBraunzone
    @TheBraunzone2 ай бұрын

    The conflating of rhetorical sophism with philosophy is the down fall of the West.

  • @thedolphin5428
    @thedolphin5428Ай бұрын

    You should have watched the video and listened to what she said. Laughing at what you said.

  • @EPMTUNES
    @EPMTUNES5 ай бұрын

    Great use of Rhetoric in this presentation

  • @user-qv6ir3dh1n
    @user-qv6ir3dh1n5 ай бұрын

    Concise explanation. Good job!

  • @slate1496
    @slate14965 ай бұрын

    Thank you for making this. I have watched this video twice to be able to write a speech in my politics class, and it has helped me create a speech that my teacher has praised.

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson5 ай бұрын

    Yay! That makes me smile. Thanks for the feedback!

  • @LostArchivist
    @LostArchivist5 ай бұрын

    B.C.

  • @ibrahimsheha8902
    @ibrahimsheha89026 ай бұрын

    Thank you so much Patricia, I have a final in a couple of hours and you just saved my GPA, I really appreciate your efforts.

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson6 ай бұрын

    This makes me smile. Thank you!

  • @temimegraham1904
    @temimegraham19046 ай бұрын

    Concise and so simple to learn. Better than my professor and those lousy materials.

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson6 ай бұрын

    Thank you! My students found it helpful.

  • @nicholasto896
    @nicholasto8966 ай бұрын

    Thank you!

  • @_its.christy143
    @_its.christy1436 ай бұрын

    Such a great video !

  • @aghniasofyan3577
    @aghniasofyan35776 ай бұрын

    Thanks, Patricia! Really helped me understand more about these stages. And it's great that you clarified with DeVito too. Amazing presentation 🤩

  • @KhristienVR
    @KhristienVR6 ай бұрын

    This helped a lot

  • @astranger7438
    @astranger74386 ай бұрын

    This video made me need bread!😂😂 On my way to the bread store to get me my bread!

  • @laurieford6373
    @laurieford63737 ай бұрын

    Thanks for vid.

  • @michaeld.johnson5235
    @michaeld.johnson52357 ай бұрын

    I think this video interprets uncertainty avoidance incorrectly. Cultures that are high on uncertainty avoidance have a low tolerance for ambiguity. Watchers should note that the cultures identified here as being tolerant of ambiguity are not (Sweden, Singapore, Denmark, Germany), and those identified as being intolerant of ambiguity are (Russia, Hungary, Guatemala, Bolivia). The confusion might be because Hofstede classified the USSR as having high uncertainty avoidance, while Project GLOBE found Russians to be low in uncertainty avoidance.

  • @matthewademola9020
    @matthewademola90207 ай бұрын

    Plainly explained. The steps are easy to follow. Simplicity at its best.

  • @yuvitech5157
    @yuvitech51577 ай бұрын

    thank you ma'am it helped a lot

  • @josephngoran1517
    @josephngoran15178 ай бұрын

    Great topic!!! It is very informative. Thank you for sharing.

  • @kinzaqasim2208
    @kinzaqasim22088 ай бұрын

    Thank you for making this easy to understand!

  • @nabuusodoreen-6442
    @nabuusodoreen-64428 ай бұрын

    it was very help ful to me,true definition of a teacher

  • @MuhammadSuleiman
    @MuhammadSuleiman8 ай бұрын

    This is so inspiring

  • @TEBAKBENDA
    @TEBAKBENDA8 ай бұрын

    come to learn

  • @PatriciaJenkinson
    @PatriciaJenkinson8 ай бұрын

    I hope it helped!