Пікірлер

• 
  @CaptnHampton223 күн бұрын

  when did people start using the word "whenever" to mean "when"? Like nails on a chalkboard.

• 
  @DeMortuisAutNilAut10 күн бұрын

  Nice informative video, but why is the background music so fire 🔥

• 
  @willlane238813 күн бұрын

  tapered

• 
  @jerichoj519320 күн бұрын

  hello sir , can i request how to do a 3D view on this monitor?

• 
  @echologged498627 күн бұрын

  Thanks for the instructional video, very helpful!

• 
  @vlotaАй бұрын

  Useful info. But you don't leave the details screens up for long enough to read the info [and I'm a fast reader!]. Maybe you shouldn't have been such a slave to that "less than 5 min" hook.

• 
  @PitPwny19 күн бұрын

  There’s a message at the begging that states “pause video as needed”. It’s there specifically for people like you who are “fast” readers.

• 
  @rayRay-pw6gzАй бұрын

  Using this type of machine you are prone to side mill using an end mill. They do not call them END mill for nothing. You should plunge cut an end mill and just light finish side climb mill. That way you only have to sharpen the bottom . End mill last much longer and less time grinding just the bottom.

• 
  @akolkar2530Ай бұрын

  Thanks for brief summarised video can you add inches and mm size in video so that will be helpfull practical use.

• 
  @ianmcgougan1173Ай бұрын

  Pity that you don't have time to read the important text! Annoying!

• 
  @briand6671Ай бұрын

  Very Nicely Done , It's as if my machinery handbook came to life with a quaint song playing in the background. P.S. It's much more than 5 minutes with the pauses.

• 
  @papajohn365Ай бұрын

  Why is it labeled "inch" instead of SAE, which is more accurate?

• 
  @MrStevosАй бұрын

  You left out "British Standard". In the 70's I owned a Wickman Screw machine, which had Metric, Whitworth, & British Standard , threads on it !

• 
  @HDJessАй бұрын

  Cool. I work in aviation and I have to deal with both ISO and SAE threads, which is interesting. And confusing, sometimes. Metric is for sure the better logic, but aviation still hangs on to SAE for the most parts, unfortunately. Regarding drill bits (as I've noticed some people commented), we only use metric drill bits, even for inch holes. It's just much easier to measure with a digital caliper and say "I need a 7.5mm drill", instead of dealing with the fractions.

• 
  @toordog1753Ай бұрын

  Its not inch, ots standard

• 
  @roberts1677Ай бұрын

  Thanks for the refresher. ME3180 was a long time ago.

• 
  @chadportenga7858Ай бұрын

  Buttress looks similar to a standard inch or metric thread that has been over stressed but not quite stripped out.

• 
  @kevenquinlanАй бұрын

  Great Vid. I love interesting factoid type stuff like this. Who knew there were so many different types- super cool and Thanks.

• 
  @Bob-ke9inАй бұрын

  Fascinating!

• 
  @ejoldmanАй бұрын

  BSF and BA no longer around I guess.

• 
  @jamiekent1970Ай бұрын

  Why is it “ inch” instead of “imperial”??

• 
  @qpwodkgh2010Ай бұрын

  Doesn't ACME also make rocket skates, anvils, giant springs, invisible anything, tunnels painted on a rock face, all sorts of munitions and all sorts of falling objects?

• 
  @flamencoprofАй бұрын

  A day class's worth of info. Excellent!

• 
  @ianh.6825Ай бұрын

  Great video. Informative and entertaining.

• 
  @RsBGroupsАй бұрын

  Thanks, I did learn something useful.

• 
  @aluminumfalcon552Ай бұрын

  Nothing like when someone over torques a standard thread and it becomes a buttress

• 
  @ninalliАй бұрын

  Nice work and very informative. Very good education for us amateur engineers.

• 
  @nigtturnerАй бұрын

  Not inch surely it’s imperial

• 
  @mirandahotspring40192 ай бұрын

  What? No BSF?

• 
  @jasonh52662 ай бұрын

  Perfect explanation

• 
  @rohitdhiman-ph3fs2 ай бұрын

  Inches thread angle 55 hota h .. aap ne 60 de rkha h... This is wrong

• 
  @Isaac-gj4ww2 ай бұрын

  *Promosm* 😑

• 
  @mrcoolabhishek1232 ай бұрын

  Great video

• 
  @rixretros2 ай бұрын

  Excellent vid with great animaton. One caveat for the newbies out there. Mass produced capscrews/bolts and nuts have ROLLED threads which have zero stress points at the rounded root and crest. This makes them stronger than MACHINED threads which have sharp edges at the root and crest. These sharp edges are stress prone and thus make machined capscrews/bolts and nuts weaker. ALWAYS use fasteners with rolled threads whenever possible, especially in high load and/or vibration prone areas.

• 
  @midnightrunner6842 ай бұрын

  I'm forced to Cha Cha dance while i watch this video .The music got me dancing .Ive got no control over the music 😮

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  haha, same here!

• 
  @IanBradford-MusicIan2 ай бұрын

  No mention of the effective diameter, for the uninformed is the diameter used when rolling threads

• 
  @oscarmoretti82382 ай бұрын

  Hola, TRADUCIDO AL ESPAÑOL/CASTELLANO POR FAVOR🙏....Bahhhh, si te interesa la "TELEAUDIENCIA LATINA" 🤷‍♂️!!!!! GRACIAS 👋👋🇦🇷🇦🇷

• 
  @Vlad220519692 ай бұрын

  Ого

• 
  @DaveEtchells2 ай бұрын

  Huh, so simple. The central concept is to support at 3 points and zero those points. Bingo, you’ve got a plane. Saw it and felt a little dumb for not having realized it in the first place. (I have a good understanding of geometry, had just never connected the dots like this.) Thanks! (Very nice animation, btw👍)

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  No problem, thanks for watching!

• 
  @DaveEtchells2 ай бұрын

  Some of this should be required viewing for high schoolers - and every college student these days as well 😁

• 
  @DaveEtchells2 ай бұрын

  Kudos and thanks! This was so clear, concise and understandable, it’s by far the best reference on thread types I’ve seen - thanks again! (Just scanned your other vids - new subscriber! 😁)

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  Glad it was helpful!

• 
  @12345NoNamesLeft2 ай бұрын

  I hate that rickety tick music. If you speak english well, do a voice over.

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  I have other videos with me talking, we do both visual 3D animations and others with me teaching "in person". Hopefully you can find some with music you like. Thanks for watching!

• 
  @12345NoNamesLeft2 ай бұрын

  @@Machining-tutorials The best music is no music.

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  @@12345NoNamesLeftthat explains why I drive home in silence time to time 😂

• 
  @jercki722 ай бұрын

  Doesn't that give you a measurement that depends on where you positionned the 3 reference points? At least it gives an upper bound on flatness

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  By setting three jacks to zero, you create a reference plane. As you scan the entire face from this plane, identifying all highs and lows, you accurately measure the surface's flatness. This method ensures consistency; regardless of how you might reposition the jacks and establish a new plane, the maximum deviation found-the total flatness-remains the same. Essentially, no matter where the jacks are placed, as long as they're zeroed to form a plane, your measurement of the surface's maximum deviation (its flatness) will always be consistent and reliable.

• 
  @jercki722 ай бұрын

  @@Machining-tutorials There definitely seems to be something missing. For example setting the three jacks very close together could give a much greater deviation on a point much farther away... although no sane person would think of doing that. Probably though if the jacks are at the edges the difference would be minimal anyway

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  Exactly! Measuring within the area defined by the three jacks, especially when they're placed towards the edges of the part, ensures greater accuracy. This practice minimizes potential deviations that could occur if measuring outside this area. Positioning the jacks near the edges is indeed good practice, as it provides a stable and representative base for assessing the entire surface's flatness. Thanks for the question. I might pin this to the top to hopefully further explain this process. Ill cover this with an actual example and link to this video to help others. Basically stay within the jack parameter for more accuracy. @@jercki72

• 
  @polobik42312 ай бұрын

  recommended gang

• 
  @ghostrider-be9ek2 ай бұрын

  worked in aviation - radius root threads are known as J threads - did not realize it was the norm with imperial threads???

• 
  @mariociaramellano75092 ай бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @cwi38952 ай бұрын

  pitch ?should be axial distance in pitch diameter

• 
  @brandons91382 ай бұрын

  The pitch and the pitch diameter are 2 different things.

• 
  @amadeussocal78332 ай бұрын

  You missed the 30 degree ISO Stub thread, which is a modified Acme thread, and has a widespread application.

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  There are so many more, we will include pipe threads in the future too. Thanks and noted!

• 
  @TechnikMeister22 ай бұрын

  Its not "inch". It's called "imperial".

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the clarification! You're right, "Imperial" is the correct term for the system, and "inch" refers to the unit of measurement within it. I appreciate the insight and will keep this distinction in mind for future discussions.

• 
  @MsPrince672 ай бұрын

  Strange, always knew inch threads are 55 degrees, you have 60, why?

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  The 60-degree angle you're seeing is actually the standard set by William Sellers in the 1860s, which deviates from the previously established 55-degree Whitworth thread. Sellers introduced a thread with a 60-degree angle and flat crests and roots, aimed at simplifying manufacturing and improving efficiency. His design was adopted in the United States and laid the groundwork for the Unified Thread Standard we often use today. So, while the Whitworth thread is 55 degrees, the standard for many inch-based threads, especially in the U.S., is indeed 60 degrees due to Sellers' innovations.

• 
  @shaneabbas39852 ай бұрын

  First of all amazing and love from India...My question to u is thread angle of Inch bolts is 55 or 60 please clarify...

• 
  @Machining-tutorials2 ай бұрын

  Both Metric and standard are 60 degrees. Whitworth threads started this at 55 degrees but the industry wanted to make it easier and Im sure if you do a deep dive in google it will unlock the history of why these decisions were made.