Пікірлер

• 
  @OhioFootHills18 сағат бұрын

  Trying to get a broken bolt out of and aluminum intake is a whole different kind of 🐮.

• 
  @ultimateusername7 күн бұрын

  12:51 I think he meant to say "mode". (the median and the mode are 5K, but the mean is 129k)

• 
  @GromaticiAeternus24 күн бұрын

  @ 1:52 fewer words professor FEWER!

• 
  @fluffycolt5608Ай бұрын

  2:30 theranos! Had they been busted by the time this was recorded?

• 
  @theultimatereductionist7592Ай бұрын

  When cuntservaturds take quantitatively trillion-times more massive problems like Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) seriously, caused by breeders overpopulating, caused by addiction to fossil fuels, addiction to extremist car centrism that denies freedom to use public space for cyclists and public trains, to meat-eaters raping torturing murdering billions of innocent animals each year when they can easily go vegan instead, which would ALSO greatly reduce FF consumption, than imaginary BS like "pizzagate" or MONUMENTALLY ALARMIST exaggerations of the number of instances of sex slave rings, only then should anyone give a fuck what cuntservatives want.

• 
  @theultimatereductionist7592Ай бұрын

  There is NOTHING special about cuntservatives using this law to their advantage. Everyone else, from Liberals and Leftists to Communists to Marxists to Anarchists & Separatists, Atheists, Animal Rights Vegans, can use Brandolini's Law to spread lies and bullshit about THEIR opponents THEIR enemies, too.

• 
  @JoesMusicandMemesАй бұрын

  Thanks so much for all your support throughout my time in the MLIS program! Can't believe I'm a real librarian now!!!

• 
  @squid17122 ай бұрын

  boy this aged poorly

• 
  @jeevacationАй бұрын

  How so

• 
  @ohiorobertstephens2 ай бұрын

  There should be efforts to combat waste, but programs should not be cut because waste exists. If there is waste due to fraud, then there should be efforts to prosecute the fraud. A Pentagon-sanctioned study in 2016 found $125 billion in waste over a 5-year period or $25 billion a year, but that is out of budgets approaching $900 billion a year, but we don't advocate cutting the Department of Defense. Some studies indicate the average worker engages in non-productive activity around 3 hours out of every 8, which mean companies are wasting close to 40% of salaries and wages paid. All the waste is significant and needs to be curtailed, but the percentages of the whole also need to be considered. Meanwhile, a more expansive cost-benefit analysis should really be done to determine whether a specific program or approach is cut.

• 
  @ConniHutton2 ай бұрын

  Damn shame

• 
  @ConniHutton2 ай бұрын

  Google fake news and each user hears something different- social media

• 
  @m.oldani2 ай бұрын

  Vomit.

• 
  @calmhorizons4 ай бұрын

  The book was great too. Needs a re-issue with a large section on "AI" - which is a bullshit minefield enabled by data science.

• 
  @avradio0b4 ай бұрын

  Hm, I think both Hybrid Cars and Fuel Prices are heavily impacted by a third force, development of technology. Since oil is limited, fuel prices will increase over time. We're able to get more oil, driving up prices at a quicker rate in the long run, because of the development of new technology. Similarly, hybrid car sales increase as hybrid cars become more affordable/available, which is likewise caused by the development of new technology that allows manufacturers to produce them more cheaply/efficiently. So, my hypothesis is that both gas prices and hybrid car sales are caused by this third force, advances in technology, and that the "either-or" choice is a trick

• 
  @Jo156735 ай бұрын

  2:37

• 
  @Jo156735 ай бұрын

  3:25 6:15

• 
  @johnries55935 ай бұрын

  Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

• 
  @josiaphus6 ай бұрын

  CS Lewis called it scientism.

• 
  @CanadianPranks126 ай бұрын

  Living in bullshit in canada with bullshit people

• 
  @MisterTutor20107 ай бұрын

  It's hard for me to care since I got cheated out of my lead author papers as a grad student and postdoc. All this tells me is that PIs are corrupt.

• 
  @Dalme-eu6db7 ай бұрын

  .

• 
  @jrodriguez82168 ай бұрын

  Thank you for such clear and simple illustration using these different examples, beautiful to watch this lecture.

• 
  @JavierBonillaC9 ай бұрын

  If you prolong the graph of running times ... oh they said it.

• 
  @TS-009 ай бұрын

  For DARPA AI-alphas to use as a near-term reference. Similar to its bankers, ChatGPT couldn't find it's butt with a flashlight. Now it has to work out if the BS goes into or out of it's butt, or is that BUT?

• 
  @fraslex9 ай бұрын

  This speaker is ignorant of science. Flying airplanes has nothing to do with problems in psychology.

• 
  @fraslex9 ай бұрын

  Well psychology and neuroscience are social sciences, not science. So replication cannot happen in social science.

• 
  @sunway13745 ай бұрын

  Ya, we need to look into the scale of the problem in biological and physical sciences.

• 
  @Vejita129 ай бұрын

  Hahaha bullshit.

• 
  @NickofTime-vv7eg9 ай бұрын

  Party line gossip

• 
  @Jsmaw2029er9 ай бұрын

  Can't stand the sniffling. That person ruined the video. Go blow your damn nose.

• 
  @MBACCR9 ай бұрын

  George Carlin would agree.

• 
  @user-ug2hk3go6i9 ай бұрын

  The speaker took four minutes to acknowledge t irritating interference? Wow.

• 
  @williamwalker3910 ай бұрын

  Science today is deeply flawed in so many ways. It is no longer about the search for truth as it used to be. The problem started as scientists began to professionalize and money and scientific politics entered the game. Today scientists are motivated by career advancement and play the game to that end. Their papers are not clear and use jargon and mathematics to impress. It has gotten to the point that even specialists, much less laymen, have difficulty reading and understanding scientific papers. Researcher often regurgitate papers and republish them in an altered form so that they can increase their number of publications. It is all about quantity and not quality as it used to be. Fundamental science is not possible today. The foundations of science can not be challenged, because the gatekeepers will not allow it. Science has become a religion, with its gods, and priests, and writings only they can read and interpret. The gatekeepers fear change and control the game to remain in power. I am a PhD physicist and I am deeply troubled at what science has become. For the past 30 years I have been researching the foundations of physics. During this time I have amassed both theoretical and experimental evidence proving Special and General Relativity is wrong. It is the foundation of physics and the gate keepers will not allow it to be published or discussed. So I am quite familiar with this problem. Einstein was clearly aware of the argument I present, but never discussed it. What is really disturbing is that so many experiments claim to have confirmed these theories, which points to a very serious problem in science. For more information on my research, I have made a short KZread video: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZmExqxwpra3prQ.html

• 
  @seanrrr9 ай бұрын

  "Today scientists are motivated by career advancement and play the game to that end." Just want to add to this, since it comes across like scientists are scammers trying to rig the system. There are plenty of scientists that are genuinely passionate about their field, and don't want to do this. They'd much rather spend their time pursuing foundational research and big stories, but are forced to into playing politics to keep their jobs and get funding. This is happening in my lab (small group led by a young career scientist). My PI and I would love nothing more than to publish a big story in a top journal that pushes our field forward; and we could. Instead, we have to spend our time on a dozen small side projects that no one cares about and no one cites just to keep afloat. Her, so she can get funding for the lab and get tenure for job security, me so I can get scholarships to stay in grad school. She was reprimanded by admin since we weren't publishing enough, and they compared us to another lab that literally publishes the same f-ing paper over and over with different species ("Genome of species x", "Genome of species y", "Genome of species z", over 20 times). These smaller projects are a waste of time, but admin just looks at the publication numbers and say we're doing good. This is just one of the reasons I'm planning on jumping ship from academia after graduation...

• 
  @williamwalker399 ай бұрын

  I really sympathize. I know many regret what has become of science, and academia, and wish it were otherwise. But this is not enough. We need to fight back and try to change the system, or it will not change and may get even worse. I encourage you to stay in academia if you can, since it is easier to change the system from within.

• 
  @emmarector67710 ай бұрын

  Another component to overfitting is interaction, where there are multiple aspects that are related in and of themselves. As a result, the model starts "double counting" that aspect. Reminds me of the previous videos on correlation and causality.

• 
  @eotikurac10 ай бұрын

  it's not a diamond if it's on a nano scale. a diamond is not an element, it's basically a rock and i don't know anyone who would say a speck of dust is a rock. these guys are bullshit artists on a mission to shit on trump.

• 
  @okoegualeeromosele192410 ай бұрын

  And does the course require coding and advance maths?

• 
  @okoegualeeromosele192410 ай бұрын

  What foundational courses do I need to take to do well in this program?

• 
  @ozanox670010 ай бұрын

  5:20 thats bullshit. If government gets involved it will manipulate even more

• 
  @HeatherWhiteman10 ай бұрын

  Thanks for sharing your work Lucy! Love hearing how students can learn to be independent researchers and the need for exposure to it to help find their passions.

• 
  @daisyqvq407010 ай бұрын

  That's what I thought about Francesca Gino's work...

• 
  @stevetaxpayer666410 ай бұрын

  Research fraud has facilitated the entire climate change lie. Climate research fraud has in turn led to billions and billions of dollars being diverted from real issues (like hunger, homelessness, illness, etc.) to useless climate action instead.

• 
  @microdesigns200010 ай бұрын

  Abandonment of morality. “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. Exodus 20:16 You might also make a case that there is an institutional problem, the prioritization of paper writing which is supposed to be the culmination of excellent work but has the practical reward for quantity over quality. And the moral problem with that is trickier, that the value of a man or woman is linked to their productivity, the principle of slavery. This principle is taught in academia at a young age by the giving of tests and awards to the high achievers rather than the focus of making all people productive.

• 
  @craigbenz483511 ай бұрын

  The best yet.

• 
  @craigbenz483511 ай бұрын

  Analogous to this are studies finding voters are more easily bullshitted when watching political debates on T. V. than they are when listening to them on radio.

• 
  @craigbenz483511 ай бұрын

  Last weekend I went round and round about this with a cousin while discussing the value of the equipment left in Afghanistan during the pull out. Especially after considering the cost of removing the equipment.

• 
  @craigbenz483511 ай бұрын

  How do we square the portion leading up to 3:12 with ad hominem fallacies? Is it the difference between convincing oneself and convincing others?

• 
  @toddmcdaniels156711 ай бұрын

  If this were really just attributable to type 1 errors and p hacking, why is it that when authors were contacted for assistance replication went up from 33% to 49% (4:51) ? Still far too low, but from approximately a third to approximately a half suggests to me that the competence of those trying to do the replication is a factor, otherwise why would there be any disparity in replicability between the assisted and non-assisted groups? Data is data. It should be irrelevant whether it comes from paper or from the authors. So, it would appear likely that advice from the authors provides a leg up in replicating their experiments. I haven't read the article in question, but it might be that one actually has to have expertise with a specific subject matter or methodology before attempting to replicate. Did they? How far off was the significance in the replication failures (e.g. p < .07 ?)? It might also be a question of communication perhaps not enough information is going into the methodology sections, or perhaps they need to be more didactic or narrativized. I find it ironic that I cannot determine the answers to my questions from this presentation.

• 
  @plursocks11 ай бұрын

  Little did they know six years later, we will have entered a world that is so wild the actual real is almost indistinguishable from the onion and Donald Trump has been arrested for attempting a coup

• 
  @coleride11 ай бұрын

  This is what happens when you replace competence with gender parity and diversity quotas

• 
  @azsunburns11 ай бұрын

  Science is violence. Science IS broken.