Пікірлер

• 
  @mackysobrevega17804 күн бұрын

  For the Quick Scan Plus software, it automatically crops some of my scans. Is there a way to disable this?

• 
  @flowermaze___9 күн бұрын

  You forgot the humble Kiev 60 - a solid and pretty fun 6x6

• 
  @anthonyfullwood535511 күн бұрын

  I was just gifted one of these but without a power cord! Got to find one now. I'm excited after watching this!

• 
  @kalenderquantentunnel941115 күн бұрын

  A very good comparison! I have been using Hasselblad 500 and 2000 for 15 years and would not go down that route again. They might be easy to carry but if you carry the whole system it gets heavy too and in both cases you are wishing for a cart to carry it a longer distance. If you are using just the 80 mm Planar the Hblad is portable and the RZ still isn't but neither camera will give you critically sharp photos this way due to mirror-slap, compared to a TLR-Rolleiflex which I also owned for some time. Also, the Hasselblad needs more maintainance than any other systems I ever owned with regular cleaning and tuning of shutters every few years, complete deadlock in a 500 ELM and uneven spacing in two backs which came back dead as a brick from cla. Before you look for a Hasselblad first find a competent repairer you trust. You can imagine that my trust in that system is rather limited now and my love for the 80 mm F-Planar and 150 mm C-Sonnar cant make up for this. Some of the other lenses, notably the non-fle 4/50 mm and the 5.6/250, aren't really much to write home about btw. The Mamiya is a great camera for working from the trunk or around your house and on a tripod and there it is more flexible due to the available tilt/shift accessories, bellows-focussing and rotating back. The blad is more of an elegantly executed compromise in everything coming from the Rolleiflex 6x6 (55x55 mm actually) heritage.

• 
  @garethhayes998216 күн бұрын

  Just bought a hasselblad 500c cant wait

• 
  @jasongold675125 күн бұрын

  Mamiya too heavy for me! Hasselblood needs constant services, that are pricey! I use a '50's Rolleiflex Automat. Lens hood, filter and close up lens! A system that you can hold in one hand!

• 
  @jacovanlith508227 күн бұрын

  The sheetfilm holder is not just for making a test exposure. Dozens of special photographic emulsions were for sale as sheet films, butnot in 120 rollfilm. With the special purpose Hasselblad scissors you had to make your 6x6 cm sheetfilm. There are A32 and A32s backs There is an A 2456 back for 35 mm film. The 70 mm back with double perforatiefilm was for aerial photography, for scientific photography, for medical photography etc. The short extension tubes are great for a closer shot with the Zeiss tele lenses. Two types of Hasselblad Polaroid backs for test shots and instant BW negatives. Mount a Hasselblad 500 C/M body to any 4x5 view camera by a special adapter.

• 
  @faribahiАй бұрын

  Using the term " Analog " already indicates that you know nothing about the subject you are discussing about !

• 
  @JonathanNotleyАй бұрын

  It’s a catch all term for cameras without digital sensors used by the non-autistic community

• 
  @faribahiАй бұрын

  @@JonathanNotley As a person you do not need to follow other people if they are wrong. Specially if you contribute to the knowledge of something, you need to make your research and not just superficially publish erroneous terms just because many young people and new to the art, like yourself, don't know the history and the progression of the art and technic of photography. Make a research before publishing something. Just the wrong term in the title tells us the whole review is greatly dubious. Unfortunately social medias these days are full,of people who just are in search for publishing contents without value just to gain followers and money.

• 
  @faribahiАй бұрын

  @@JonathanNotley And by the way, there is no such a thing as "digital sensor" as you say, all sensors are analog !

• 
  @davinozenАй бұрын

  Isn’t it an incident meter?

• 
  @JonathanNotleyАй бұрын

  White bobble = incident, viewfinder = reflective … some are both!

• 
  @faiosungАй бұрын

  THANKS FOR VERY GOOD COMPARISON. NOT BEING FUNNY, BUT IS THERE ANY POINT AT LOOKING AT 600%?IS IT NOT ALL DIGITAL NOISE AT ANYTHING MORE THAN 100%?

• 
  @JonathanNotleyАй бұрын

  The closer you look the more the details come apparent - that’s the point of comparison. You can make anything look the same if you print it the size of a postage stamp and view it from 15ft.

• 
  @faiosungАй бұрын

  @@JonathanNotley if you need to blow it up 6x maybe you need more 6x more megapixels in your scanner/ camera?

• 
  @b6983832Ай бұрын

  This Provia looks like it has been developed for 7 minutes in first developer. Fuji films often need to be processed slightly longer than Ektachrome, but adding a full minute to Provia is too much. 30 seconds is enough. Velvia 50 should be developed for 7 minutes (standard time is 6:00(. This is most likely the reason for your Provia looking about half a stop overexposed compared to Ektachrome.

• 
  @JonathanNotleyАй бұрын

  I didn’t know that tidbit about the timings but I still feel my experience is representative. I handed both rolls to the best film lab I know and they were likely processed in the same batch so the difference is what others would experience too.

• 
  @salembiad2Ай бұрын

  Hi Jonathan. I hope you’re well! I just wanted to say I really enjoy your videos and hope you post again.

• 
  @EurokaGirl2 ай бұрын

  Thanks so much for this detailed video. It has been instrumental in helping me understand the Hasselblad system before I go and buy myself one.

• 
  @timcmiles2 ай бұрын

  Just purchased a 500cx! This was very helpful! Thanks for taking the time to put this together! Very much appreciated! I am looking forward to getting acquainted with my Hassy!

• 
  @JonathanNotley2 ай бұрын

  Glad it helped!

• 
  @don71172 ай бұрын

  I bought this camera a couple years ago because I wanted to use the lens on my digital camera. Starting to think about trying film. Will run a couple rolls and see how it goes. This is an excellent tutorial for newbies to both film and this camera body. Thanks!

• 
  @rvbsoundfactory2 ай бұрын

  Super late to the party, think I'm more interested in the Delta 100. Like you said it as a little bit more (pop contrast) which I personally like. These days good software can do a nice job of reducing contrast. Now, the search is on for a good developer for Delta 100.

• 
  @maximeandrieu78342 ай бұрын

  Great video lad ! ❤

• 
  @harlhequim2 ай бұрын

  it shows your passion for tthe exelence of the camera, and in the process helped to remind me many things.....after watching the video got out everything hasselblad I own and realize many lenses needs service, also 1 body and 1 back . Got my work cut out for me, but at least is a starting point.

• 
  @arneheeringa963 ай бұрын

  There's a vid on KZread by Figital Revolution (Stephen Schaub) who explains how you can do variating ISO on ONE FILM with Stand Dev. He uses DDX 45 Min. and always does a 5 Minute presoak to prevent bromide drag (streaking). I have tried T-Max Dev and T-Max mixed with Parodinal, but not with variating ISO. Roger from SFLAB did a Rodinal stand test and the best I thought was the one without any agitation apart from the starting ones.

• 
  @iDONTdoFacebook3 ай бұрын

  Thank You! Very helpful review!

• 
  @jameshanes75743 ай бұрын

  You should do the video holding and looking into the Zenzanon as though you are talking to the Bronica.

• 
  @jcollins13053 ай бұрын

  Im a rolleiflex shooter, but I still have not given up on a hassy if I can find one in good condition for a good price. I hear repairs are inevitable and expensive, but who knows. Both of my rolleis have been dead reliable and offer superb results.

• 
  @magiccarpetrider45943 ай бұрын

  Not any 35. It’s the most boring compromising focal length out there. Not wide enough to count, and impossible to shoot square. What lens? I’d vote 50mm. Then 28. Go from there, if you want wider or longer. I went 21, 90. Maybe another 50. My 28 is the Summilux, so I bought a 24 for a lighter option without getting a second 28. I’m up to 5 leica, 2 voightlanders.

• 
  @SourPlanet19 күн бұрын

  @@magiccarpetrider4594 LOL imagine blaming the focal length for your inability to make it interesting or use it correctly. Love how you're on voigtlanders when you told me "yOu BuY LeiCa fOr ThE gLaSs" 😂

• 
  @SourPlanet3 ай бұрын

  There's a super budget category now too! The Chinese manufacturers are on a roll. I had to test a M240 and picked up the cheapest local sale I could find-- 7Artisans 35/2, $150. It's shockingly good. So good I haven't even replaced it yet. Great video. Kinda confirms what I've found, which makes it perfect for people who haven't the time to research. Nice work 👌👌

• 
  @magiccarpetrider45943 ай бұрын

  Why buy a $6-8000 body and cheap out on the glass? The reason to buy Leica is for the lenses!

• 
  @SourPlanet3 ай бұрын

  @@magiccarpetrider4594 Nah. The reason I bought a Leica is because I want a rangefinder. I didn't pay $6k for my 12 year old M240 lol. I'm on budget so I got the lens I could manage. You suggest that I instead let the camera collect dust on a shelf while I save up? Lens is perfectly good and built like a tank. You've never used it, so you have no idea. Armchair expert, as usual.

• 
  @karlgreene21773 ай бұрын

  Beautiful camera.

• 
  @michaelappleyard63003 ай бұрын

  There seem to be a lot of usability downsides to switching from the Hasselblad 500CM to the RZ67, with the only benefit being the small increase in negative width from 56mm to 68mm. This results in an aspect ratio of roughly 6:5. Is it worth it for the extra inconvenience and the back ache? One might just as well crop the 6cm x 6cm frame down to 6cm x 5cm when editing since the effect on image quality of doing that is fairly slight. To go seriously "unsquare" and yet gain in IQ, maybe the logical step is to go to 6 x 9 (actually 56 x 84mm) and get the genuine 2:3 aspect ratio. That train of thought leads to the Fujica GL690 series of rangefinder cameras, since there are no other practical alternatives for this format. Having recently acquired one of these, along with three lenses, I can vouch for the image quality which is top class. Being a rangefinder camera, close-up work with the GL690 is probably not its forte although the viewfinder does have parallax compensation. However, the portability and ease-of-use are much closer to the 500CM than the RZ67 while the prices are nearer to the RB67 system than to the Hassy. Of course, like with all these old medium format cameras, one has to buy with great care to avoid big repair bills.

• 
  @byok.lighting3 ай бұрын

  Such a great video, thank you very much! Highly informative and entertaining!

• 
  @JTroker3 ай бұрын

  You're talking boloney.

• 
  @JonathanNotley3 ай бұрын

  Is that a word that means “sense, specifically in reference to light meters?”

• 
  @anthonys_expired_film3 ай бұрын

  Hi Jonathan! Really like your videos, and this one I found very helpful. I do a lot of expired film photography on my Instagram account (same name as you see here) and I do a lot of color balancing (I usually call it color correcting) with my film scans. Expired film has a lot of color shifts, so it’s a challenge! I don’t have an Epson scanner, I use a less expensive scanner from Wolverine, so I usually open my bad color scans in Photoshop Elements. I never knew how to use the color curve so I found that helpful. You are very knowledgeable and I hope you continue with videos when you can. Thank you so much for what you do here on KZread. Cheers from USA 🇺🇸. Anthony

• 
  @yellowshuttle4 ай бұрын

  Excellent review. You mention slide film a couple of times -- do you just scan that too? What's the advantage, compared to negative film?

• 
  @eyesonly44514 ай бұрын

  This somewhat confirms what I've always thought about Provia having a ½-stop over/under larger dynamic range than does E100. And also that Provia is a bit more neutral, making it a better starting point in a scanning workflow. I'd rather be adding contrast in post than trying to remove it.

• 
  @woodypigeon4 ай бұрын

  Rawtherapee has some comprehensive negative inversion features.

• 
  @HarveyWallbanger-ho2cq4 ай бұрын

  I'm sorry I bought all of my film cameras. Film and processing costs have left me penniless

• 
  @renee-claudetanguay97384 ай бұрын

  Been looking to purchase one for a bit now, and can’t seem to locate one.

• 
  @j797s254 ай бұрын

  i love that "90s mums" will forever have beautiful photos from this camera to remember their memories with their families, compared to the era of low quality digital/early phone cameras we went through in the first 2 decades of 2000s. Only now do phones and digital cameras actually take good photos and now we are circling back to used cameras from the 20th century.

• 
  @6Holtabe94 ай бұрын

  Brilliant video! I like that it's not your typical over the top youtuber content while not taking yourself too seriously at the same time. All the information I was looking for is there. Audio quality is impeccable and the setting is great. An all around good job. Cheers chap!

• 
  @theaustralianchef4 ай бұрын

  I bought a 501cm, £3000, was it worth it.... yes, and Im a chef lol

• 
  @theaustralianchef4 ай бұрын

  My 501cm just arrived, loved your video. thanks for the info.

• 
  @Havsorm4 ай бұрын

  Brilliant video mate, very helpful insigts! Might I ask how you scan your negatives, they come out so sharp? Let the lab do it or you have a scanner yourself?

• 
  @peterbear29294 ай бұрын

  Love your work Jonathan. Don't even have this camera but enjoyed all the explanations about a timeless piece of technology.

• 
  @Mazzeltoph4 ай бұрын

  Honestly, got a three-pack for christmas two years ago and searched a video to check if my scans were just wacky or not. Turns out, even though i like grain, the xpro grain is too destructive for my taste and the color shifts are too reddish for me. Will keep this in the fridge for now, maybe shoot it in the future. Not that big of a fan.

• 
  @13ahab4 ай бұрын

  Great video but kill the music please, because it makes you difficult to hear.

• 
  @Alaric20304 ай бұрын

  What kind of film scanner are you using?

• 
  @Tsudkyk5 ай бұрын

  Stand developing is excellent for darkroom printing.

• 
  @RickTepes5 ай бұрын

  Kiev 60🥰

• 
  @Film_Fog5 ай бұрын

  In January 2024 (exactly 6 years after this video was posted) Delta 400 from AG Photographic now costs £118. That’s a year on year price rise of %9.09 from £70 six years ago.

• 
  @Goldsteinphoto5 ай бұрын

  I used Hassies early in my career. (Starting in 1973) They take great quality photos. But the lack of instant return mirtor bothered me. The screen was not bright. (I did buy a third party Britescreen) The interlock of F stop and shutter speed selectors is awkward and makes bracketing exposures difficult. Doesn't have 1/3 F click stops. Loading film is slow. The pins that hold the backs on bend. There is a lot of vibration with the mirror and rear light blind. The mechanical connection between body and leaf shutter cocking can get out of sync...locking a lens on. Polaroid back could prevent use of some 90 degree prisms. I switched to the Rollei 6006 system as soon as it came out. Like going from a WWII prop plane to a jet fighter. Just one example: on a Hassie, after your last shot, you wind on and try to take another shot but the camera is locked up...sometimes just as the model has a perfect expression. My assistant had to watch the frame counter and stop me to reload. On the Rollei, the film automatically winds off after the last shot. Then you can just swap in a cheap preloaded film insert...no need to change backs. The film will advance to the first frsme.

• 
  @sanguyer66835 ай бұрын

  Very nice description of the options in this format - intelligently presented.

• 
  @peterkennedy55966 ай бұрын

  This was great. I’ve had hasselblad 500c/m and el/m’s for years. I think it’s time to bring them out and use them. It’s been years.

• 
  @mohammadaqeel73576 ай бұрын

  Very informative. Great work. Just curious, what camera you use to capture your videos? Cheers