The entirety of Judges 13 disagrees strongly with this.
@JoshD87052 күн бұрын
My understanding of Trinity vs Oneness is Trinitarians think of God like an Egg; egg shell, egg white, egg yolk, and Oneness thinks of God like Ice, water, and steam.
@gideonopyotuadebo23044 күн бұрын
LOGOS (WORD) IS GREEK PLUTO IDOLATROUS THEOLOGY WHICH WAS IMPORTED BY HELENISTIC ANTILAW CHRISTIANS THAT EMBRACE SYNCRETISM WITH GREEK CULTURE
@Republican_Banana7 күн бұрын
There were numerous times Richie said God is two persons. I'm oneness and have never heard or read that. Saying God is two persons is the same as the trinity.
@nito21377 күн бұрын
You should write your own Bible.
@jimbobhaha8 күн бұрын
John 20:17 NASB Jesus said to her, “Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.’”
@CalledChosenandFaithful8 күн бұрын
Trinitarians only came into existence in 381 when the teaching was created. Thus, Jesus and the Apostles were not such. It is a satanic addition to God's word.
@bobjames374810 күн бұрын
Steve Morrison lost badly here, it wasn't even close, man didn't prove his Tritheistic view ( and that is what he is left with a Catholic Mother religious idea, taken from The Ancient Paganistic cultures that were against The Jews and One God. One must keep in mind that the Catholic and Protestant Harlots got in power by murder, torture, lying, false doctrines and hate. Steve is holding the bag here of that, his Trinity church idea and false baptismal formula which actually makes him a Catholic stooge, is not the biblical truth taught by Jesus or the Apostles. On e God is not three persons! Notice Steve must become like the Mormon Tritheists in using many extrabiblcal word and phrases to prop up a Triune godhead. He thinks us Oneness have a hard time, while he denies who Jesus truly is, the one only True God. The old three headed monstrosity that mother sauntered out, has been shelved by the Protestant error filled churches, but if possible these would be beheading and torturing Monarchians aka Oneness Pentecostals if they could fir the very same old triad with just different names, because they don't know Jesus is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.Ibstead they are a composite committee of beings and Jesus the 2nd one and a junior God and the Holy Spirit truant at almost every turn. I wouldn't trust Steven, as far as I could throw him. His. Church missing and he must accept the 2nd century inventors of a logos 2 god or subordinationalist or the vertical theory of F S HS Which is not what they are throwing around today. See this godless vile religious idea of three god as Jimmy Swaggart and Finis Dake believed. Steve I'm sure hates to be a Catholic, but make no bones, he is stuck as a pig in a spot and the religious group he is in, has no support from the Bible. Jesus is not the one only true God, he is not even all of God, he is not even a glimmer in mother's eye of the Full Deity.
@timgaskey225813 күн бұрын
Let "Us" make Man in "Our" image... Totally 2nd person pronouns no way around it.
@timgaskey225813 күн бұрын
But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. One verse shows 2 different minds. 2 different people.
@S.R.M.19 күн бұрын
Most Christians believe the doctrine of the Trinity to be biblical, and they cite Matthew 28:18-20 or 1 John 5:7. But is the following the original quote of Christ? “And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” These verses are the modern-day rendition identifying an interpolation, so the question must be asked, “Did Christ speak every word found in these verses?” The first Church Historian Eusebius (quotes Matthew 28:19 as it appeared in the early 4th century, Christ said, “Go and make disciples of all nations in My name” (Matthew 28:19, as it was originally quoted, Eusebius, The History of the Church, p. 68, Penguin Classics, 1965). Note, He never said, “...baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.” Which commandment did the disciples hear? It appears the latter quoted by Eusebius from an original manuscript of the NT, for there is no instance of the disciples ever baptizing anyone “In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,” according to the New Testament! On baptisms specifically were done in the name of {YAHSHUA}, Martin Luther notes, “The apostles certainly used this formula in baptizing in the name of Christ only, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles,’ citing Acts 2:38; 10:48; and 19:5” (Erik H. Herrmann, Paul W. Robinson, The Annotated Luther, Volume 3: Church and Sacraments. Fortress Press. p. 66, 2016). In a documented sermon, Martin Luther made this astonishing statement, “It is indeed true that the name ‘Trinity’ is nowhere to be found in the Holy Scriptures, but has been conceived and invented by man” (The Sermons of Martin Luther, Vol. 3, 1988, p. 406). The disciples of Christ in the first two or more centuries did not know of any doctrine of the Trinity. Historically, “There is no evidence that the apostles of Jesus ever heard of the trinity-at any rate from him” (H. G. Wells, The Outline of History, Vol. 2, p. 499, 1920). Therefore, without a doubt, The so-called Great Commission, as written is an interpolation: "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19, the words “...in the name of the Father and of the Son, and the Holy Ghost” were added centuries later). The disciples were to make disciples in His name, and they were baptized in the name of Christ only as the NT gives evidence. The formula is mentioned in the Didache (7:1-3), and it is mostly accepted as authentic due to its supporting manuscript evidence (Everett Ferguson, Baptism in the Early Church, 2013, pp. 134-5). Nevertheless, some scholars have held the view that the passage in the Didache is an interpolation as it is absent from the first few centuries of early Christian quotations, in which case it is believed it would be part of an apostolic or early Christian oral tradition from which both the received texts of Matthew and the Didache emerged, however, the conclusion is the church only baptized in the name of Christ. The view of the passage as an interpolation was in recent times maintained, and this particular line of opposing arguments by Trinitarians is pure eisegesis, meaning the process of interpreting a text in such a way as to introduce one's presuppositions, agendas, or biases, that artificially supports the Trinitarian formula, and based on interpolated verses added to the New Testament. Catholics and Protestants would agree with Protestant Theologian James White, who writes, “We hang a person’s very salvation upon the acceptance of the doctrine…We must know, understand, and love the Trinity to be fully completely Christian” (The Forgotten Trinity, pp. 14-15). And yet most other scholars know that the Trinity is beyond human understanding, “The mind of man cannot fully understand the mystery of the Trinity. He who has tried to understand the mystery fully will lose his mind, but he who would deny the Trinity will lose his soul” (Harold Lindsell and Charles Woodbridge, A Christian Handbook, pp. 51-52, 1953). Nowhere in the New Testament is believing in the Trinity a prerequisite for one’s salvation. Nowhere in the Bible did the LORD ever reveal Himself as a Trinity, or Triune God. Interpolations exist in the New Testament, which are words added later to prove the Trinity. Matthew 28:19 and 1 John 5:7 are proven interpolations, and therefore not of the original Scriptures. 1 John 5:7 is known as “The Johannine comma,” due to a sequence of extra words in 1 John 5:7-8 which appear in later versions of the Bible, but not in earlier Scriptures. Compare these words below in italics in the KJV and the same verse from the newer ESV. "For there are three that bear record (witness) in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one" (1 John 5:7-8 KJV). "For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree" (1 John 5:7-8, ESV). These extra words are generally absent from the early Greek manuscripts. They only appear in the text in late medieval manuscripts, which were done by Trinitarians to bolster the man-made doctrine of the Trinity. The Trinitarian doctrine only existed since the 4th century! A religion unexamined is not worth having. Besides, most Christians when questioned about the Trinity prove to be Modalists, not Trinitarians (The Forgotten Trinity, p. 16). Christians have given examples of the Trinity, and one is the steam, water, and ice, which is not a good example for it only proves modalism. The Trinity is not so much a mystery as it is the doctrine of confusion, and we know that God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33).
@Republican_Banana7 күн бұрын
If you can't trust matthew 28;19 to be authentic, then you can't trust any of scripture to be authentic.
@S.R.M.5 күн бұрын
@@Republican_Banana Truth is consistent. 1 John 5:7 is an interpolation, and Matthew 28:19 is an interpolation, which means words were added and not in the original text. The apostate Church redacted these verses, but I know of no others. I trust that 99.9% of the verses in the Bible are correct. All interpolations cause inconsistencies. I have exposed them to you. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
@Republican_Banana5 күн бұрын
@@S.R.M. How do you know Acts 2:38 is authentic? Or John 8 with the woman in adultery? How do we know John's gospel is authentic? Once you start saying something is wrong in the Bible, then all of it is suspect.
@S.R.M.5 күн бұрын
@@Republican_Banana Once again, truth is consistent, so when you see inconsistencies in the Bible, you prayerfully search asking the Father for the Truth. So no, not all is suspect.
@Republican_Banana5 күн бұрын
@@S.R.M. You say the truth is consistent, but then you say there are inconsistencies in the Bible. Therefore the Bible according to you cannot be truth. This is why picking it apart doesn't work
@OldGuy70s19 күн бұрын
No one knows the day or hour, except the father in heaven.....? 1) This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased. Baptism (Mark 1:11) 2) This is my Son listen to Him. Transfiguration (Matthew 17:5) 3) I have glorified your Name and will do it again. Last week of his life (John 12:28)
@ralphowen336722 күн бұрын
A Oneness historian, possibly David Bernard, said Clement was one of the last non- trinity bishops of Rome. I suppose this was due to the falling away from the first century faith predicted by Paul in Acts 20:29.
@ralphowen336722 күн бұрын
Apostolic Oneness people are good on the Godhead, but miss it on eternal security.
@user-pf7vt2rp1l23 күн бұрын
Did you mean Clement did not think Jesus is God, I'm confused
@ralphowen336724 күн бұрын
The Spirit is not separate from the Son of God, but distinct, just as humanity is distinct fro the Deity. When Jesus was the word in eternity, it was God Himself, as says Jn. 1:1-2.
@BigTimeFaith25 күн бұрын
Praise be to the only true God and His Son - Jesus
@marcushill358826 күн бұрын
Perfect teachimg Amen
@alanhales112327 күн бұрын
Global impact ministries stop deceiving people Huparcho, in Phil 2: 6. means, "Eternally existing" as God, with God. It goes with Jn 1: 1. Jn 17: 5. Where Jesus WAS WITH, Face to face alongside God, eternaly before the world began. Trust you to only use the meanings that suit your erroneous beliefs.
@AMG4663229 күн бұрын
Friends! Hallelu YAH. Hallelu YAH = YAH is Savior. Thank you for your service! Just as a supplement, to our existing knowledge. Ask: is that for as relevant??? o “What is his NAME, and what is his son`s NAME, if thou canst tell?” Proverbs 30,4 b. o This is our goal the restoration from the father's NAME and his son! o “YAHUAH, is our Elohim / God; his judgments are valid all over the earth." 1 Chronicles 16:14 o “I, YAHUAH, am your ELOHIM; walk in my statutes, and keep my statutes, and do them." Ezekiel 20:19 NAMES YAHUAH - ONE NAME o SIGILIUL LUI YAHUVAH kzread.info/dash/bejne/fKSTuriyd67fnco.html IONELA TUDOR o Christianity teaches "all you must do is believe in Jesus!" kzread.info/dash/bejne/dICasbSPqtDIoKQ.html o YAHUAH'S NAME IS NOT GOD kzread.info/dash/bejne/gHunlNqRoKrSj5c.html o One YAHUAH - kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6B6r6eDd8bOd7w.html o YaHuWaH (Yahuah) One Name! From Genesis To Revelation kzread.info/dash/bejne/e6NrpcqgpNyqkpM.html o MOST USED WORD IN SCRIPTURES WHAT IS IT kzread.info/dash/bejne/maVks7qPfrO8Xbg.html o IDENTITY OF YAHUSHA IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4V-xNpse6SoqcY.html o What is the name of the creator & the meaning of His name? (Yahuah) kzread.info/dash/bejne/fnVs1bR8fZvRj7g.html o YAHUAH REMOVED HIS NAME o kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaeIuNutlrGoYrw.html o Who is Yahuah? | Yahuah Is The Creator And Ruler Of The Universe | Yahuah Meditation kzread.info/dash/bejne/lKuLpZR7n7fSYpM.html o Yahuah's name great again - kzread.info/dash/bejne/nZ1qp5exptneZ8o.html o WHAT IS THE TRUE NAME OF OUR CREATOR & MESSIAH? kzread.info/dash/bejne/k62K0ZqKc6-ph9Y.html o Shema Yisreal (Israel) YAHUAH version kzread.info/dash/bejne/h5plrK2Jo8_fmtY.html o Yahweh is...a DESERT PAGAN God! - Dr. Gene Kimkzread.info/dash/bejne/dICb1cqTlZe6aNo.html o The lost Name YHVH. It is not lost, it just have been forgotten kzread.info/dash/bejne/pWZ_qcyCfNvSkdY.html o Set part unto Yahuah, our Master and King! kzread.info/dash/bejne/qmakmqatqcu8XdY.html o MY PEOPLE WILL KNOW MY NAME Lew White - kzread.info/dash/bejne/a212zrVyf9fSl7g.html o My Name is YAHUAH - kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4d5t5iJhsfJc6g.html o Seal Of YAH: Promise of Protection! - kzread.info/dash/bejne/fnlrlZuQh8a1law.html o The Seal of Yahuah - kzread.info/dash/bejne/n4yi09OriNqqisY.html o His name Yahuah is of great importance ! - kzread.info/dash/bejne/pq56ssOHpaSemrQ.html o Key of knowledge Yahuah's name ! kzread.info/dash/bejne/da2bptx7abKbkrQ.html o The Key of Knowledge kzread.info/dash/bejne/Ypl-qM-Qp66YptI.html Hallelu YAHUAH. Amen. Gepostet am 06.06.2024 / 5784
@alanhales112329 күн бұрын
Global impact ministries, Steve 0:42 Ritchie, like all oneness people, twists the Bible and the Biblical Hebrew and Greek, and makes things up, things that oppose the Bible.
@alanhales1123Ай бұрын
Global impact ministries, because you are an unsaved antichrist, (As the Bible says about those who deny the Father AND the Son as two distinct persons in the ONE God), you have been blinded by the spirit of antichrist that's in you, so you can't see the Biblical truths. The Biblical Greek preposition "WITH" demonstrates a relationship between two or more persons existing simultaneously. It also means (Face to face). The meaning of, "WAS", is, (Eternally). So Jn 1: 1. The Word WAS, (Eternally) WITH, (Face to face) God. 1st person singular, And the Word was God 2nd person singular. Two distinct persons in the ONE God. V 2, HE, (Personal pronoun) was in the beginning WITH (Face to face) God. Two distinct persons. The ""Word" in this context, isn't a thought, or plan, it doesn't have an impersonal pronoun, it has an Personal pronoun. The same thing with Jn 17: 5. Stop twisting the scriptures, you devil inspired man.
@DON72657Ай бұрын
Sorry but I’m still not buying what he’s selling! Even if God was talking to his angels when he said US then he should have then said in MY image not OUR image, angels are not human but created beings although they can manifest themselves to look like humans. He never did mention 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. The Word is Jesus. The Trinity is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost or Spirit. That's why God said in Genesis 1:26 us and our! It’s just my interpretation as the video is his. All that really matters in the end is the Gospel of Salvation! 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.
@ScriptureRealityАй бұрын
Mary would not believe your words.Mary was not told no such thing in Luke 1:35 that God would become a man.
@dariuszadler147Ай бұрын
I have a question, did I understand you correctly that the HOLY SPIRIT of GOD became incarnate in the body and became the Lord JESUS? If so, when did it happen? at the time of John's baptism? then the SPIRIT OF GOD dwelt in the Lord JESUS?
@kimberHD45Ай бұрын
Your faith isn't apostolic, it's purely 20TH century revisionism. It can trace it's history no further back than Azuza Street and Methodism influence. This video is misdirection and far-reaching, relying on one quote by a critic of a then current of popular heresies brewing among the poorly un-catechised roman population. Popularity isn't a mark of truth, how many evil things are quite popular? There were several heresies brewing in the region, and adoptionism and modalism weren't alone. Like all other heresies the various forms of modalism died out, but persist in sporadic eruptions as private interpretation always revives them. This explains oneness pentecostalism, the modern iteration. The simplest refutation is that modalism erupts and disappears, each time different than the previous. Noetus had a significantly different form than Sabellius, and the modalists of today aren't any different, and both forms faded away into obscurity when the Church refuted them. The one universal distinctive of all Christians of the time, even in an age when the Christological controversies hadn't ran their course and been "ironed out" yet, was the belief in the Real Presence. No modalist can pretend to have any apostolic connection because modalists reject the apostolic teaching of the Real Presence, which is only one of the many distinctives that separate the true apostolic Church form modalist pretenders.
@lindamorgan2678Ай бұрын
Do oneness pent get baptized in the name of Jesus only? Because the bible says in the NAME of the father son and Holy Ghost not the title. Anyhow the first thing that came to mind and I asked him while scratching my head" What did John say when he baptized Jesus " Hey Jesus I baptize you in the name of Jesus" Maybe that is not the same as oneness I have no clue but kinda sick and tired of the the silly changes and revelations from these NEW denomination "in the last 150 years" and their BS gimmicks
@richardhill3rdАй бұрын
I think this is first century and even more pointed is the attack on Pauline practices...outlining the debate between the Church of Jerusalem and the Apostolic Church....It says any prophet asking for money is a false prophet ..1 Corinthians 16:2...asking for money....Prophets not walking in the way of God...Paul preaches you don't need Torah only Jesus...it all fits perfectly with James the Just and Jude and the Church of Jerusalem
@richardhill3rdАй бұрын
Also this has to be Jewish sect writing...it says "do not the gentiles" in comparison to the way of life. Also notice that in food it says try but if you can't do what you can. This is exactly the argument with Paul, the Laws of Moses, and the Church of Jerusalem.... coincidentally....this was what the Council of Jerusalem lead by James the Just ruled on....don't impose the laws on them but "They will learn in the synagogue from communion with Jews...
@richardhill3rdАй бұрын
The commentary on baptism without submersion is erroneous...the argument goes back before Christ. Mikva in Judaism has been argued by Rabbis whether or not submersion or sprinkling was good enough. It's usually settled the same way the Didache says... submersion is best sprinkling works in the event submersion isn't possible.
@ronaldotorres7937Ай бұрын
LOGOS= THOUGHT, IDEA, CONCEPT, PLAN.
@waynejarvis370Ай бұрын
Oneness foolishness, you are lying about Dr. Brown. He has again and again exposed you who lie in the oneness movement. You are deceiving your followers for if you say “boon” many would say hallelujah. If Michael Brown said God is one Person was mispoken for he never has taught that nonsense. There is only one God who manifests Himself in three Persons. You “say” you respect Dr. Brown, He is not a oneness Pentecostal, he has said that “if you follow the oneness doctrine fully that you cannot be saved for you reject God the Son.” Now that is what he said. You sound like a Unitarian who says Jesus was not God in the flesh but a “created being” by God. People do not listen to this man’s lies about Dr. Michael Brown who is an actual Bible Scholar who is born-again, who is filled with the Holy Spirit and speaks in tongues daily, who believes in divine healing and the gifts of the Holy Spirit still functioning today, and understands the Trinity or God the Fahter, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Do not listen to this shyster of the scriptures preying on a mistake spoken once, not listening to the context of the whole message of Dr. Brown. Go to “The line of Fire” and hear Dr. Brown for yourself what he believes on Oneness Pentecostalism. And to clear up another shyster remark, a Trinitarian believes there is one God, and only one God. But we do not believe like a Unitarian or oneness and that God limits Himself to one Person. The New Testament is replete with this understanding of the Trinity. Lastly, Jesus Himself said to baptize in the NAME of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The word name is singular, there is only one God, but Jesus reveals the three Persons Himself! Just read it!
@waynejarvis370Ай бұрын
Oneness foolishness, you are lying about Dr. Brown. He has again and again exposed you who lie in the oneness movement. You are deceiving your followers for if you say “boon” many would say hallelujah. If Michael Brown said God is one Person was mispoken for he never has taught that nonsense. There is only one God who manifests Himself in three Persons. You “say” you respect Dr. Brown, He is not a oneness Pentecostal, he has said that “if you follow the oneness doctrine fully that you cannot be saved for you reject God the Son.” Now that is what he said. You sound like a Unitarian who says Jesus was not God in the flesh but a “created being” by God. People do not listen to this man’s lies about Dr. Michael Brown who is an actual Bible Scholar who is born-again, who is filled with the Holy Spirit and speaks in tongues daily, who believes in divine healing and the gifts of the Holy Spirit still functioning today, and understands the Trinity or God the Fahter, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Do not listen to this shyster of the scriptures preying on a mistake spoken once, not listening to the context of the whole message of Dr. Brown. Go to “The line of Fire” and hear Dr. Brown for yourself what he believes on Oneness Pentecostalism. And to clear up another shyster remark, a Trinitarian believes there is one God, and only one God. But we do not believe like a Unitarian or oneness and that God limits Himself to one Person. The New Testament is replete with this understanding of the Trinity. Lastly, Jesus Himself said to baptize in the NAME of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The word name is singular, there is only one God, but Jesus reveals the three Persons Himself! Just read it!
@roberthornbrook8374Ай бұрын
Pastor Richie thank you so much for your great debate I believe this pastor is very since pastor Bruce I hope he will see the truth one day but it is so hard for them to leave it’s tradition but God can show him I have met trinity believers who are baptised in Jesus name
@roberthornbrook8374Ай бұрын
It’s easy to understand the oneness if you open your heart I remember I was in a living room I attended a baptist church I was praying with oneness people they said they wanted to pray for me to receive the holy spirit but I said I have the Holy Spirit. I was praying and I then just felt water coming from my belly and I spoke in other tongues I was so excited to tell my pastor he wasn’t happy. I started to see baptism in Jesus name and one scripture saying Father son holy spirit . I prayed and said Lord when I go out to work today lead me to someone to speak to me about Jesus name baptism . I went out then a sister approached me and started talking about baptism I got baptised in Jesus name. I invited a married couple from my baptist church penny and Roger they both decided to get re Baptised in Jesus name one of them came out the water speaking in tongues. The trinity people are good people but it’s tradition we mustn’t judge them let’s pray for them
@loishenley7605Ай бұрын
They spend so much time debating about god and Jesus, I want to know where god came from, was he married? Did he ever have a body? Where did the beginning come from? How was sin in heaven? Questions!!
@loishenley7605Ай бұрын
This is confusing but I’m trying to understand. If you don’t have a body are you a spirit or person? Why did god send his spirit to Mary? She conceived, so is Jesus god in a baby ? Confusing
@AstariahFoxАй бұрын
Both sides are wrong
@Jeff-xt7xsАй бұрын
God cannot die, yet Jesus was killed and then resurrected (Acts 5:30). The Bible does not say that only his “human nature” died; it says that Jesus died, which would include all of Jesus (100%).
@Jeff-xt7xsАй бұрын
God cannot die, yet Jesus was killed and then resurrected (Acts 5:30). The Bible does not say that only his “human nature” died; it says that Jesus died, which would include all of Jesus (100%).
@etwi-mensahalbright792Ай бұрын
Thank you Jesus
@alanhales6369Ай бұрын
Global impact ministries, Stop twisting the scriptures and the Biblical Greek. The Biblical Greek preposition "WITH", in Jn 1: 1--2. And Jn 17: 5. demonstrates a relationship between two or more persons simultaneously existing. It also means (Face to Face alongside). Jesus was and is Eternally WITH (Face to Face alongside) God. The "Word", in Jn 1:1, isn't a plan or thought, the Bible and the Biblical Greek gives the Word a personal pronoun, whereas, you being an unsaved antichrist, (As the Bible says about those who deny the trinity), give the Word an impersonal pronoun. You really are inspired by the devil.
@alanhales6369Ай бұрын
Global impact ministries, forget what people say, we have to go by what the Biblical Greek says, and it says HE was in the beginning WITH, (Face to Face alongside) God. The Bible and the Biblical Greek gives the Word a personal pronoun. Whereas you give the Word an impersonal pronoun. You twist the Biblical Greek to get your erroneous beliefs. Stop deceiving people you unsaved antichrist.
@bobjames3748Ай бұрын
It was a absolute beat down of Ethan Smith, the man may want to try studying the Bible and knowing something what he is gonna say and not try to put the other fellows ideas out, without knowledge what he knows.
@bobjames3748Ай бұрын
Walter Martin tried to use uparkon in his debate with Robert Saban and Nathaniel Urshan on the John Ankerberg. He was wrong then and here Ethan Smith is wrong as well to use that. I do believe that if we did not have laws on the books in western civilization countries that they would be hunting us down like they did as Catholics and then Protestants. If one merely went to foxes book of Martyrs and martyrs mirror they would find that these people couldn't help but kill monarchy ends unitarians ariens Jews and others ,. non-believers
@EasternRomanOrthodox.Ай бұрын
You are lying heretics! "Semi-Arian" is a later term you invented! The Blessed Tertullianus was never a modalist nor an Arian, he was 100% Orthodox & so were Eusebius, Calixus & Zepherinus! You are the Modalist heretics!!!
@andrewlopez638Ай бұрын
i would like to point out that he said muslims that watch him put back out his videos online for him for some reason. and he looks shocked at this. i would like to suggest that maybe they are doing that because you are helping the same team that is the devil.....i dont trust wicked men like John Calvin to understand the nature of God let alone to affirm how He exists. its educated men who exalt learning as if it was holiness arguing about conjugates and nouns, verbs and the like. Its men like James who follow Calvin and other heretics that frustrate the simplicity of the Gospel and identity of God.
@lutherbronnerАй бұрын
That lie out Hell. When said that my well beloved Son heard Him. When God push all power in Son Jesus Christ Hand. God lie he don’t have a Son. To the true and living God. Without beginning or ending of time . Without mother without Father. To be eternity. Anything that was made or created is a False God. Study the scripture let the Holy Spirit. You can’t interpret God . Only the Spirit know God.
@bobstine3785Ай бұрын
In regard to an eternal Son, didn't Origen live after the Gospel of John was written? And weren't the Modalists deemed heretics?
@Talk-jn7xoАй бұрын
The problem with this, is. Personhood isn't bound to our human nature. We have out of body experiences and it's still me. So Jesus is the Father, you're making it like the Father is a seperate conciousness in his Human nature. Jesus said Him and the Father are TWO WITNESSES.
Пікірлер
The entirety of Judges 13 disagrees strongly with this.
My understanding of Trinity vs Oneness is Trinitarians think of God like an Egg; egg shell, egg white, egg yolk, and Oneness thinks of God like Ice, water, and steam.
LOGOS (WORD) IS GREEK PLUTO IDOLATROUS THEOLOGY WHICH WAS IMPORTED BY HELENISTIC ANTILAW CHRISTIANS THAT EMBRACE SYNCRETISM WITH GREEK CULTURE
There were numerous times Richie said God is two persons. I'm oneness and have never heard or read that. Saying God is two persons is the same as the trinity.
You should write your own Bible.
John 20:17 NASB Jesus said to her, “Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.’”
Trinitarians only came into existence in 381 when the teaching was created. Thus, Jesus and the Apostles were not such. It is a satanic addition to God's word.
Steve Morrison lost badly here, it wasn't even close, man didn't prove his Tritheistic view ( and that is what he is left with a Catholic Mother religious idea, taken from The Ancient Paganistic cultures that were against The Jews and One God. One must keep in mind that the Catholic and Protestant Harlots got in power by murder, torture, lying, false doctrines and hate. Steve is holding the bag here of that, his Trinity church idea and false baptismal formula which actually makes him a Catholic stooge, is not the biblical truth taught by Jesus or the Apostles. On e God is not three persons! Notice Steve must become like the Mormon Tritheists in using many extrabiblcal word and phrases to prop up a Triune godhead. He thinks us Oneness have a hard time, while he denies who Jesus truly is, the one only True God. The old three headed monstrosity that mother sauntered out, has been shelved by the Protestant error filled churches, but if possible these would be beheading and torturing Monarchians aka Oneness Pentecostals if they could fir the very same old triad with just different names, because they don't know Jesus is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.Ibstead they are a composite committee of beings and Jesus the 2nd one and a junior God and the Holy Spirit truant at almost every turn. I wouldn't trust Steven, as far as I could throw him. His. Church missing and he must accept the 2nd century inventors of a logos 2 god or subordinationalist or the vertical theory of F S HS Which is not what they are throwing around today. See this godless vile religious idea of three god as Jimmy Swaggart and Finis Dake believed. Steve I'm sure hates to be a Catholic, but make no bones, he is stuck as a pig in a spot and the religious group he is in, has no support from the Bible. Jesus is not the one only true God, he is not even all of God, he is not even a glimmer in mother's eye of the Full Deity.
Let "Us" make Man in "Our" image... Totally 2nd person pronouns no way around it.
But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. One verse shows 2 different minds. 2 different people.
Most Christians believe the doctrine of the Trinity to be biblical, and they cite Matthew 28:18-20 or 1 John 5:7. But is the following the original quote of Christ? “And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” These verses are the modern-day rendition identifying an interpolation, so the question must be asked, “Did Christ speak every word found in these verses?” The first Church Historian Eusebius (quotes Matthew 28:19 as it appeared in the early 4th century, Christ said, “Go and make disciples of all nations in My name” (Matthew 28:19, as it was originally quoted, Eusebius, The History of the Church, p. 68, Penguin Classics, 1965). Note, He never said, “...baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.” Which commandment did the disciples hear? It appears the latter quoted by Eusebius from an original manuscript of the NT, for there is no instance of the disciples ever baptizing anyone “In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,” according to the New Testament! On baptisms specifically were done in the name of {YAHSHUA}, Martin Luther notes, “The apostles certainly used this formula in baptizing in the name of Christ only, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles,’ citing Acts 2:38; 10:48; and 19:5” (Erik H. Herrmann, Paul W. Robinson, The Annotated Luther, Volume 3: Church and Sacraments. Fortress Press. p. 66, 2016). In a documented sermon, Martin Luther made this astonishing statement, “It is indeed true that the name ‘Trinity’ is nowhere to be found in the Holy Scriptures, but has been conceived and invented by man” (The Sermons of Martin Luther, Vol. 3, 1988, p. 406). The disciples of Christ in the first two or more centuries did not know of any doctrine of the Trinity. Historically, “There is no evidence that the apostles of Jesus ever heard of the trinity-at any rate from him” (H. G. Wells, The Outline of History, Vol. 2, p. 499, 1920). Therefore, without a doubt, The so-called Great Commission, as written is an interpolation: "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19, the words “...in the name of the Father and of the Son, and the Holy Ghost” were added centuries later). The disciples were to make disciples in His name, and they were baptized in the name of Christ only as the NT gives evidence. The formula is mentioned in the Didache (7:1-3), and it is mostly accepted as authentic due to its supporting manuscript evidence (Everett Ferguson, Baptism in the Early Church, 2013, pp. 134-5). Nevertheless, some scholars have held the view that the passage in the Didache is an interpolation as it is absent from the first few centuries of early Christian quotations, in which case it is believed it would be part of an apostolic or early Christian oral tradition from which both the received texts of Matthew and the Didache emerged, however, the conclusion is the church only baptized in the name of Christ. The view of the passage as an interpolation was in recent times maintained, and this particular line of opposing arguments by Trinitarians is pure eisegesis, meaning the process of interpreting a text in such a way as to introduce one's presuppositions, agendas, or biases, that artificially supports the Trinitarian formula, and based on interpolated verses added to the New Testament. Catholics and Protestants would agree with Protestant Theologian James White, who writes, “We hang a person’s very salvation upon the acceptance of the doctrine…We must know, understand, and love the Trinity to be fully completely Christian” (The Forgotten Trinity, pp. 14-15). And yet most other scholars know that the Trinity is beyond human understanding, “The mind of man cannot fully understand the mystery of the Trinity. He who has tried to understand the mystery fully will lose his mind, but he who would deny the Trinity will lose his soul” (Harold Lindsell and Charles Woodbridge, A Christian Handbook, pp. 51-52, 1953). Nowhere in the New Testament is believing in the Trinity a prerequisite for one’s salvation. Nowhere in the Bible did the LORD ever reveal Himself as a Trinity, or Triune God. Interpolations exist in the New Testament, which are words added later to prove the Trinity. Matthew 28:19 and 1 John 5:7 are proven interpolations, and therefore not of the original Scriptures. 1 John 5:7 is known as “The Johannine comma,” due to a sequence of extra words in 1 John 5:7-8 which appear in later versions of the Bible, but not in earlier Scriptures. Compare these words below in italics in the KJV and the same verse from the newer ESV. "For there are three that bear record (witness) in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one" (1 John 5:7-8 KJV). "For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree" (1 John 5:7-8, ESV). These extra words are generally absent from the early Greek manuscripts. They only appear in the text in late medieval manuscripts, which were done by Trinitarians to bolster the man-made doctrine of the Trinity. The Trinitarian doctrine only existed since the 4th century! A religion unexamined is not worth having. Besides, most Christians when questioned about the Trinity prove to be Modalists, not Trinitarians (The Forgotten Trinity, p. 16). Christians have given examples of the Trinity, and one is the steam, water, and ice, which is not a good example for it only proves modalism. The Trinity is not so much a mystery as it is the doctrine of confusion, and we know that God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33).
If you can't trust matthew 28;19 to be authentic, then you can't trust any of scripture to be authentic.
@@Republican_Banana Truth is consistent. 1 John 5:7 is an interpolation, and Matthew 28:19 is an interpolation, which means words were added and not in the original text. The apostate Church redacted these verses, but I know of no others. I trust that 99.9% of the verses in the Bible are correct. All interpolations cause inconsistencies. I have exposed them to you. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
@@S.R.M. How do you know Acts 2:38 is authentic? Or John 8 with the woman in adultery? How do we know John's gospel is authentic? Once you start saying something is wrong in the Bible, then all of it is suspect.
@@Republican_Banana Once again, truth is consistent, so when you see inconsistencies in the Bible, you prayerfully search asking the Father for the Truth. So no, not all is suspect.
@@S.R.M. You say the truth is consistent, but then you say there are inconsistencies in the Bible. Therefore the Bible according to you cannot be truth. This is why picking it apart doesn't work
No one knows the day or hour, except the father in heaven.....? 1) This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased. Baptism (Mark 1:11) 2) This is my Son listen to Him. Transfiguration (Matthew 17:5) 3) I have glorified your Name and will do it again. Last week of his life (John 12:28)
A Oneness historian, possibly David Bernard, said Clement was one of the last non- trinity bishops of Rome. I suppose this was due to the falling away from the first century faith predicted by Paul in Acts 20:29.
Apostolic Oneness people are good on the Godhead, but miss it on eternal security.
Did you mean Clement did not think Jesus is God, I'm confused
The Spirit is not separate from the Son of God, but distinct, just as humanity is distinct fro the Deity. When Jesus was the word in eternity, it was God Himself, as says Jn. 1:1-2.
Praise be to the only true God and His Son - Jesus
Perfect teachimg Amen
Global impact ministries stop deceiving people Huparcho, in Phil 2: 6. means, "Eternally existing" as God, with God. It goes with Jn 1: 1. Jn 17: 5. Where Jesus WAS WITH, Face to face alongside God, eternaly before the world began. Trust you to only use the meanings that suit your erroneous beliefs.
Friends! Hallelu YAH. Hallelu YAH = YAH is Savior. Thank you for your service! Just as a supplement, to our existing knowledge. Ask: is that for as relevant??? o “What is his NAME, and what is his son`s NAME, if thou canst tell?” Proverbs 30,4 b. o This is our goal the restoration from the father's NAME and his son! o “YAHUAH, is our Elohim / God; his judgments are valid all over the earth." 1 Chronicles 16:14 o “I, YAHUAH, am your ELOHIM; walk in my statutes, and keep my statutes, and do them." Ezekiel 20:19 NAMES YAHUAH - ONE NAME o SIGILIUL LUI YAHUVAH kzread.info/dash/bejne/fKSTuriyd67fnco.html IONELA TUDOR o Christianity teaches "all you must do is believe in Jesus!" kzread.info/dash/bejne/dICasbSPqtDIoKQ.html o YAHUAH'S NAME IS NOT GOD kzread.info/dash/bejne/gHunlNqRoKrSj5c.html o One YAHUAH - kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6B6r6eDd8bOd7w.html o YaHuWaH (Yahuah) One Name! From Genesis To Revelation kzread.info/dash/bejne/e6NrpcqgpNyqkpM.html o MOST USED WORD IN SCRIPTURES WHAT IS IT kzread.info/dash/bejne/maVks7qPfrO8Xbg.html o IDENTITY OF YAHUSHA IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4V-xNpse6SoqcY.html o What is the name of the creator & the meaning of His name? (Yahuah) kzread.info/dash/bejne/fnVs1bR8fZvRj7g.html o YAHUAH REMOVED HIS NAME o kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaeIuNutlrGoYrw.html o Who is Yahuah? | Yahuah Is The Creator And Ruler Of The Universe | Yahuah Meditation kzread.info/dash/bejne/lKuLpZR7n7fSYpM.html o Yahuah's name great again - kzread.info/dash/bejne/nZ1qp5exptneZ8o.html o WHAT IS THE TRUE NAME OF OUR CREATOR & MESSIAH? kzread.info/dash/bejne/k62K0ZqKc6-ph9Y.html o Shema Yisreal (Israel) YAHUAH version kzread.info/dash/bejne/h5plrK2Jo8_fmtY.html o Yahweh is...a DESERT PAGAN God! - Dr. Gene Kimkzread.info/dash/bejne/dICb1cqTlZe6aNo.html o The lost Name YHVH. It is not lost, it just have been forgotten kzread.info/dash/bejne/pWZ_qcyCfNvSkdY.html o Set part unto Yahuah, our Master and King! kzread.info/dash/bejne/qmakmqatqcu8XdY.html o MY PEOPLE WILL KNOW MY NAME Lew White - kzread.info/dash/bejne/a212zrVyf9fSl7g.html o My Name is YAHUAH - kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4d5t5iJhsfJc6g.html o Seal Of YAH: Promise of Protection! - kzread.info/dash/bejne/fnlrlZuQh8a1law.html o The Seal of Yahuah - kzread.info/dash/bejne/n4yi09OriNqqisY.html o His name Yahuah is of great importance ! - kzread.info/dash/bejne/pq56ssOHpaSemrQ.html o Key of knowledge Yahuah's name ! kzread.info/dash/bejne/da2bptx7abKbkrQ.html o The Key of Knowledge kzread.info/dash/bejne/Ypl-qM-Qp66YptI.html Hallelu YAHUAH. Amen. Gepostet am 06.06.2024 / 5784
Global impact ministries, Steve 0:42 Ritchie, like all oneness people, twists the Bible and the Biblical Hebrew and Greek, and makes things up, things that oppose the Bible.
Global impact ministries, because you are an unsaved antichrist, (As the Bible says about those who deny the Father AND the Son as two distinct persons in the ONE God), you have been blinded by the spirit of antichrist that's in you, so you can't see the Biblical truths. The Biblical Greek preposition "WITH" demonstrates a relationship between two or more persons existing simultaneously. It also means (Face to face). The meaning of, "WAS", is, (Eternally). So Jn 1: 1. The Word WAS, (Eternally) WITH, (Face to face) God. 1st person singular, And the Word was God 2nd person singular. Two distinct persons in the ONE God. V 2, HE, (Personal pronoun) was in the beginning WITH (Face to face) God. Two distinct persons. The ""Word" in this context, isn't a thought, or plan, it doesn't have an impersonal pronoun, it has an Personal pronoun. The same thing with Jn 17: 5. Stop twisting the scriptures, you devil inspired man.
Sorry but I’m still not buying what he’s selling! Even if God was talking to his angels when he said US then he should have then said in MY image not OUR image, angels are not human but created beings although they can manifest themselves to look like humans. He never did mention 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. The Word is Jesus. The Trinity is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost or Spirit. That's why God said in Genesis 1:26 us and our! It’s just my interpretation as the video is his. All that really matters in the end is the Gospel of Salvation! 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.
Mary would not believe your words.Mary was not told no such thing in Luke 1:35 that God would become a man.
I have a question, did I understand you correctly that the HOLY SPIRIT of GOD became incarnate in the body and became the Lord JESUS? If so, when did it happen? at the time of John's baptism? then the SPIRIT OF GOD dwelt in the Lord JESUS?
Your faith isn't apostolic, it's purely 20TH century revisionism. It can trace it's history no further back than Azuza Street and Methodism influence. This video is misdirection and far-reaching, relying on one quote by a critic of a then current of popular heresies brewing among the poorly un-catechised roman population. Popularity isn't a mark of truth, how many evil things are quite popular? There were several heresies brewing in the region, and adoptionism and modalism weren't alone. Like all other heresies the various forms of modalism died out, but persist in sporadic eruptions as private interpretation always revives them. This explains oneness pentecostalism, the modern iteration. The simplest refutation is that modalism erupts and disappears, each time different than the previous. Noetus had a significantly different form than Sabellius, and the modalists of today aren't any different, and both forms faded away into obscurity when the Church refuted them. The one universal distinctive of all Christians of the time, even in an age when the Christological controversies hadn't ran their course and been "ironed out" yet, was the belief in the Real Presence. No modalist can pretend to have any apostolic connection because modalists reject the apostolic teaching of the Real Presence, which is only one of the many distinctives that separate the true apostolic Church form modalist pretenders.
Do oneness pent get baptized in the name of Jesus only? Because the bible says in the NAME of the father son and Holy Ghost not the title. Anyhow the first thing that came to mind and I asked him while scratching my head" What did John say when he baptized Jesus " Hey Jesus I baptize you in the name of Jesus" Maybe that is not the same as oneness I have no clue but kinda sick and tired of the the silly changes and revelations from these NEW denomination "in the last 150 years" and their BS gimmicks
I think this is first century and even more pointed is the attack on Pauline practices...outlining the debate between the Church of Jerusalem and the Apostolic Church....It says any prophet asking for money is a false prophet ..1 Corinthians 16:2...asking for money....Prophets not walking in the way of God...Paul preaches you don't need Torah only Jesus...it all fits perfectly with James the Just and Jude and the Church of Jerusalem
Also this has to be Jewish sect writing...it says "do not the gentiles" in comparison to the way of life. Also notice that in food it says try but if you can't do what you can. This is exactly the argument with Paul, the Laws of Moses, and the Church of Jerusalem.... coincidentally....this was what the Council of Jerusalem lead by James the Just ruled on....don't impose the laws on them but "They will learn in the synagogue from communion with Jews...
The commentary on baptism without submersion is erroneous...the argument goes back before Christ. Mikva in Judaism has been argued by Rabbis whether or not submersion or sprinkling was good enough. It's usually settled the same way the Didache says... submersion is best sprinkling works in the event submersion isn't possible.
LOGOS= THOUGHT, IDEA, CONCEPT, PLAN.
Oneness foolishness, you are lying about Dr. Brown. He has again and again exposed you who lie in the oneness movement. You are deceiving your followers for if you say “boon” many would say hallelujah. If Michael Brown said God is one Person was mispoken for he never has taught that nonsense. There is only one God who manifests Himself in three Persons. You “say” you respect Dr. Brown, He is not a oneness Pentecostal, he has said that “if you follow the oneness doctrine fully that you cannot be saved for you reject God the Son.” Now that is what he said. You sound like a Unitarian who says Jesus was not God in the flesh but a “created being” by God. People do not listen to this man’s lies about Dr. Michael Brown who is an actual Bible Scholar who is born-again, who is filled with the Holy Spirit and speaks in tongues daily, who believes in divine healing and the gifts of the Holy Spirit still functioning today, and understands the Trinity or God the Fahter, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Do not listen to this shyster of the scriptures preying on a mistake spoken once, not listening to the context of the whole message of Dr. Brown. Go to “The line of Fire” and hear Dr. Brown for yourself what he believes on Oneness Pentecostalism. And to clear up another shyster remark, a Trinitarian believes there is one God, and only one God. But we do not believe like a Unitarian or oneness and that God limits Himself to one Person. The New Testament is replete with this understanding of the Trinity. Lastly, Jesus Himself said to baptize in the NAME of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The word name is singular, there is only one God, but Jesus reveals the three Persons Himself! Just read it!
Oneness foolishness, you are lying about Dr. Brown. He has again and again exposed you who lie in the oneness movement. You are deceiving your followers for if you say “boon” many would say hallelujah. If Michael Brown said God is one Person was mispoken for he never has taught that nonsense. There is only one God who manifests Himself in three Persons. You “say” you respect Dr. Brown, He is not a oneness Pentecostal, he has said that “if you follow the oneness doctrine fully that you cannot be saved for you reject God the Son.” Now that is what he said. You sound like a Unitarian who says Jesus was not God in the flesh but a “created being” by God. People do not listen to this man’s lies about Dr. Michael Brown who is an actual Bible Scholar who is born-again, who is filled with the Holy Spirit and speaks in tongues daily, who believes in divine healing and the gifts of the Holy Spirit still functioning today, and understands the Trinity or God the Fahter, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Do not listen to this shyster of the scriptures preying on a mistake spoken once, not listening to the context of the whole message of Dr. Brown. Go to “The line of Fire” and hear Dr. Brown for yourself what he believes on Oneness Pentecostalism. And to clear up another shyster remark, a Trinitarian believes there is one God, and only one God. But we do not believe like a Unitarian or oneness and that God limits Himself to one Person. The New Testament is replete with this understanding of the Trinity. Lastly, Jesus Himself said to baptize in the NAME of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The word name is singular, there is only one God, but Jesus reveals the three Persons Himself! Just read it!
Pastor Richie thank you so much for your great debate I believe this pastor is very since pastor Bruce I hope he will see the truth one day but it is so hard for them to leave it’s tradition but God can show him I have met trinity believers who are baptised in Jesus name
It’s easy to understand the oneness if you open your heart I remember I was in a living room I attended a baptist church I was praying with oneness people they said they wanted to pray for me to receive the holy spirit but I said I have the Holy Spirit. I was praying and I then just felt water coming from my belly and I spoke in other tongues I was so excited to tell my pastor he wasn’t happy. I started to see baptism in Jesus name and one scripture saying Father son holy spirit . I prayed and said Lord when I go out to work today lead me to someone to speak to me about Jesus name baptism . I went out then a sister approached me and started talking about baptism I got baptised in Jesus name. I invited a married couple from my baptist church penny and Roger they both decided to get re Baptised in Jesus name one of them came out the water speaking in tongues. The trinity people are good people but it’s tradition we mustn’t judge them let’s pray for them
They spend so much time debating about god and Jesus, I want to know where god came from, was he married? Did he ever have a body? Where did the beginning come from? How was sin in heaven? Questions!!
This is confusing but I’m trying to understand. If you don’t have a body are you a spirit or person? Why did god send his spirit to Mary? She conceived, so is Jesus god in a baby ? Confusing
Both sides are wrong
God cannot die, yet Jesus was killed and then resurrected (Acts 5:30). The Bible does not say that only his “human nature” died; it says that Jesus died, which would include all of Jesus (100%).
God cannot die, yet Jesus was killed and then resurrected (Acts 5:30). The Bible does not say that only his “human nature” died; it says that Jesus died, which would include all of Jesus (100%).
Thank you Jesus
Global impact ministries, Stop twisting the scriptures and the Biblical Greek. The Biblical Greek preposition "WITH", in Jn 1: 1--2. And Jn 17: 5. demonstrates a relationship between two or more persons simultaneously existing. It also means (Face to Face alongside). Jesus was and is Eternally WITH (Face to Face alongside) God. The "Word", in Jn 1:1, isn't a plan or thought, the Bible and the Biblical Greek gives the Word a personal pronoun, whereas, you being an unsaved antichrist, (As the Bible says about those who deny the trinity), give the Word an impersonal pronoun. You really are inspired by the devil.
Global impact ministries, forget what people say, we have to go by what the Biblical Greek says, and it says HE was in the beginning WITH, (Face to Face alongside) God. The Bible and the Biblical Greek gives the Word a personal pronoun. Whereas you give the Word an impersonal pronoun. You twist the Biblical Greek to get your erroneous beliefs. Stop deceiving people you unsaved antichrist.
It was a absolute beat down of Ethan Smith, the man may want to try studying the Bible and knowing something what he is gonna say and not try to put the other fellows ideas out, without knowledge what he knows.
Walter Martin tried to use uparkon in his debate with Robert Saban and Nathaniel Urshan on the John Ankerberg. He was wrong then and here Ethan Smith is wrong as well to use that. I do believe that if we did not have laws on the books in western civilization countries that they would be hunting us down like they did as Catholics and then Protestants. If one merely went to foxes book of Martyrs and martyrs mirror they would find that these people couldn't help but kill monarchy ends unitarians ariens Jews and others ,. non-believers
You are lying heretics! "Semi-Arian" is a later term you invented! The Blessed Tertullianus was never a modalist nor an Arian, he was 100% Orthodox & so were Eusebius, Calixus & Zepherinus! You are the Modalist heretics!!!
i would like to point out that he said muslims that watch him put back out his videos online for him for some reason. and he looks shocked at this. i would like to suggest that maybe they are doing that because you are helping the same team that is the devil.....i dont trust wicked men like John Calvin to understand the nature of God let alone to affirm how He exists. its educated men who exalt learning as if it was holiness arguing about conjugates and nouns, verbs and the like. Its men like James who follow Calvin and other heretics that frustrate the simplicity of the Gospel and identity of God.
That lie out Hell. When said that my well beloved Son heard Him. When God push all power in Son Jesus Christ Hand. God lie he don’t have a Son. To the true and living God. Without beginning or ending of time . Without mother without Father. To be eternity. Anything that was made or created is a False God. Study the scripture let the Holy Spirit. You can’t interpret God . Only the Spirit know God.
In regard to an eternal Son, didn't Origen live after the Gospel of John was written? And weren't the Modalists deemed heretics?
The problem with this, is. Personhood isn't bound to our human nature. We have out of body experiences and it's still me. So Jesus is the Father, you're making it like the Father is a seperate conciousness in his Human nature. Jesus said Him and the Father are TWO WITNESSES.