Well, I put alot of weight on what Jesus said to Thomas, "Now that you see you believe. Blessed are those who believe without seeing." Those who 'believe without seeing' are of course the 5 wise with oil - who will be Raptured. Jesus promised that 'all who believe will live' . . . over & over again . . . OT & NT scriptures all leading to Revelation . . . the 144,000 will be evangelizing, the 2 witnesses, 3 angels fly through the heavens proclaiming the truth of the gospel over all the earth until all have heard - Tribulation Saints suddenly appear in heaven before the throne, a number so great that it cannot be counted & John does not recognize who they are . . . these are those "who believe now that they have seen", Prodicals who got indoctrinated away from what they were raised to believe, those who believe but were foolish, let themselves run out of oil, hesitated . . . God gives every possible opportunity to come to belief in Him & will by no means turn anyone away who comes to Him - anyone who does not take the mark of the beast, anyone who rejects the beast & false prophet & will not worship them, can come to believe & be saved! THIS is to put your trust in the LORD who made HIS plans & knows the heart of all.
@brendacooper57296 күн бұрын
I know the chronology does not seem to tine up, but just looking at the biblical narrative, if Ahkenaten had been the Pharaoh who Joseph had influenced, both the biblical narrative and the Egyptian narrative would have dovetailed nicely. The Israelite moving into Egypt, welcomed by Joseph and Akhenaten, then later despised by Ahkenaten's successor, probably taking the heat for Akhenaten's apostasy, according to the restored priesthood, then generations later escaping to Israel during a natural catastrophe. The two narratives would line up if we accepted that one or both of the timelines were inaccurate. Without that congruence the two narratives are so out of sync that they really don't make a lot of sense. According to the scriptures things were going great until a new Pharaoh took office, then they went from high favour to slavery, as if they were being held accountable for the past Pharaohs misdeeds. Perhaps they were. If Abraham was the first monotheist perhaps Joseph was who taught it to Ankenaten.
@CaseTrick8 күн бұрын
With the contradictions in time historically the idea Iochim (Hellene) or Ra Moshe (Kemetic) in the same part of the planet within fifty years of Henotheism presentation is absurd, calendars have been edited at least three times.
@CaseTrick8 күн бұрын
Great assembly of information ~
@THEGINPI8 күн бұрын
He is a great scholar.
@CaseTrick8 күн бұрын
The village of Sepp Horus became Sepphoris and in 1948 was torn down as Israel wanted to establish cultural history. The name was changed to Zippori yet it was the home and birth place of Ioanchim and Anna parents of Maria and grand parents of Isho the healer. In Hellene Khristos is a translation of the belief an Inorex will bring about a Khristos. Henotheism is a translation of Sumerian. Vedic texts.
@77timotheus7714 күн бұрын
Great message thanks Simon. Thank you for your encouragement.
@gillesandfio844016 күн бұрын
It is true that there’s only one single reality, and thus one set of Universal principles of truth and morality (epistemology and ethics respectively) that Aristotle was on the right track towards discovering. Dual reality monotheism however, formalized by Plato, has gravely hampered the progress towards this discovery.
@user-sz5wn9cy8i19 күн бұрын
My Favorite New Testament Scholar
@user-sz5wn9cy8i19 күн бұрын
My Favorite New Testament
@arahat.athersata20 күн бұрын
It's not about one God, but one Creation, and that is what the'Sun' disk represents.
@deepspring0923 күн бұрын
Thank you for this timely word… I was feeling that I had reached an end to my usefulness because of my age and my physical condition 😊
@randysawyer793524 күн бұрын
Great message
@colewindemuth824728 күн бұрын
1:06
@almostfaxАй бұрын
I know very little about religion but in my own thoughts, the sun gives life, nurtures life, so wouldn't it be our creator?
@mitchmclean5435Ай бұрын
Thanks be to God
@FTV678Ай бұрын
WHICH IS BEST FOR ME? BACHELORS IN BIBLE AND THEOLOGY OR BACHELOR IN CHURCH LEADERSHIP
@roberthaugen9871Ай бұрын
What about Sinuhe?
@118pickleАй бұрын
Tutmosis 🤫
@pattubeАй бұрын
I love Desi Alexander! 😊A phenomenal biblical scholar. Among other things, he's quite creative within the bounds of orthodoxy in his Genesis interpretations. For example, his position that when God clothed Adam and Eve after they had sinned, it was not to symbolize a cover for their sins with the Messiah's coming atonement, but it was to signify that Adam and Eve had become like the beasts. Also, arguing Canaan is the one whom Noah cursed, not Ham. He is a teacher who is "like the owner of a house who brings out of his storeroom treasures new and old" (Mt 13:52). I've already purchased his The Message of the Kingdom of God (published this year) and I'm working through it. I can't wait for his commentary on Genesis!
@AWICKEDVIXEN1999Ай бұрын
Y haplogroups a-h are pre-flood from Cannan. I-t are the 12 tribes of Israel. The entire house of Israel is saved. We got nothing to worry about so
@scrabbymcscrotus7481Ай бұрын
4:20 but if thats so then monotheism doesnt exist. Yahwe never denied the existence of any of the gods, in fact he acknowledges them. Yahwe is seth a god who hates to see other gods being worshipped. Envy is his primary quality- look it up, sounds familiar? I am talking abt seth. So he knows they exist or existED as he- using the story of christ- actually succeeded in annihilating the pantheons of the pagan world. But the gods arent fully dead, just extremely weakened
@ECLECTRIC_EDITSАй бұрын
The other "gods" are the fallen angels and starry host who sided with lucifer. Remember they got kicked out for their pride of not wanting to worship us.
@DiegoChavez-rr9swАй бұрын
wouldnt it be great it for once..... these sort of talk from a professor began with THE TRUTH. ie iwant to began this talk by saying. old testament charachers are mere metaphors they never existed.......
@gk-qf9hvАй бұрын
The weakest conclusion ever.
@MrSinusu24 күн бұрын
Give us the reason!
@yusuftengriverdi210210 күн бұрын
He literally ends with a meme lol what could be more weakest? He is very solid academician ofc tho
@josea.cedeno9178Ай бұрын
I be tankful . I ha ve answered all my dubs .MOses wAs apart and diferent of aton
@josephwilliammarek9566Ай бұрын
Author Ahmed Osman argues that Moses WAS Akhenaten!
@jeronims3079Ай бұрын
A scientist cannot speak objectively because they will take away the grants....money
@sandrasynar1358Ай бұрын
Sigmond Freud said it before Osman
@bellydown2927 күн бұрын
Thutmosis III was King David Amenhotep III was King Solomon Thutmosis IV/Akhenaten was Moses Don't go by bible timeline Find events in actual history and start there. Ahmed Osman blessed man of our times
@lukejones52728 күн бұрын
Moses is Sunenmut, Pharoah’s Daughter is Hatchepsut, the Pharoah’s who died while Moses was in Midian was Thutmose III, the Pharoah of the Plagues was Amenhotep II, his successor, the NOT firstborn was Thutmose IV. Akhenaten began monotheism because the gods of Egypt had all died in the plagues and Egypt lost faith
@TupacMakaveli19967 күн бұрын
@@bellydown29akhenantan let people out to Canaan ?
@M.Gultekin2 ай бұрын
I recommend you read the Corpus Hermeticum. (This book was written by the Greeks in Alexandria between 100-300 BC with information received from Egyptian priests). You will see that some parts are similar to Akhenaten's religion. ''And though the Cosmos, that is to say the Sun, is also sire himself to them that share in him; yet so far is he not the cause of good unto the lives, he is not even of their living." ''Thou therefore, O Tat, my Son, pray first to the Lord and Father, and to the Alone and to the One from whom is one to be merciful to thee, that thou mayest knowest and understand so great a God; and that he would shine one of his BEAMS upon thee In thy understanding.'' ''The sun's the greatest god of gods in heaven; to whom all of the heavenly gods give place as unto king and master And he, this so−great one, he greater than the earth and sea, endures to have above him circling smaller stars than him. Out of respect to Whom, or out of fear of Whom, my son, [doth he do this]? '' At the end of the seminar, the professor says that the Aton religion has disappeared and there is no source left. How can he be that sure? Couldn't it be that some of Aton's priests secretly continued this religion that was abolished by Tutankhamon? In my opinion, this is one of the reasons why teachings such as Hermeticism are based on secrecy. In addition, the book shares many common points with the books of Abrahamic religions. Ramses II reigned 30 years after Akhenaten. Isn't this enough time for the adherents of a religion to increase secretly and attract attention, and perhaps be exiled from Egypt? I would love to hear answers to these questions from the Professor.
@scrabbymcscrotus7481Ай бұрын
sun worship isnt the defining factor of akhenatens cult. All indoeuropean people worshipped the sun as the highest god, the swastika is the primary symbol for it, even today jesus is the main god of europe and he is a sun god as well(look up mithras for reference, the 25th of december is the time when the sun is in the middle of the star constellation crux or southern cross for 3 days before reascending. Jesus is the sun)
@M.Gultekin29 күн бұрын
@@scrabbymcscrotus7481 I know Chistianity is based on Sun worship, islam is based on Moon worship and Akhenatens religion is more complex than only sun worship, I mentioned there are similarities between the Corpus Hermeticum (which is also not just sun whorship) and the abrahamic religions and Akhenatens religion. Just look how Hermes describes God's BEAMS while shine upon on his worshipers, and imagine the hyerogliphs how Sun shines and touches Akhenaten and Nefertiti with its beams with hands at the tips of each beam.
@AbebeGodebo-op2si2 ай бұрын
God bless you
@AbebeGodebo-op2si2 ай бұрын
❤👍
@richardlopez43182 ай бұрын
Akhenaten practiced monolatry, not monotheism.
@dukeon20 күн бұрын
So did the early Isaelites
@antonius37452 ай бұрын
Evangelic means biased with literal understanding of the Bible. And as Hillel already said: he who read and explains the Thora literal is a liar .
@michaelfalsia60622 ай бұрын
All men know there is one and only true God, the creator and moral governor of the universe. See Romans chapter 1:16-32. and why man deliberately suppresses this knowledge.
@josephwilliammarek9566Ай бұрын
All the old pagan gods are real! The Abrahamic religions are false.
@jonpob74Ай бұрын
The irish magi were before all of them ie Druids(Arya)...they moved in all directions ...the bible is a twisted Roman / British church rip off of the irish original ...the 1st king Pharaoh menes is buried in Eire you can even visit it...he was going home after his reign ...theres nothing holy in the middle east the holy land is Eire ...the evidence is everywhere about it ...and covered up by academia and political powers
@user-xo9dd8hg5s2 ай бұрын
From the finds it is clear that the monotheistic doctrine of the heretical Pharaoh Akhenaten was the cause of malformation and desertification in contrast with the constitution of Egypt which depended on the prosperity of the Nile river!
@lennyvarvillejr.37882 ай бұрын
Monotheism and its roots are the reason for inquisitions ,bloodshed, and wars. Lets not forget expulsions from Egypt
@lennyvarvillejr.37882 ай бұрын
Amun Ra was an earlier monotheism and was practiced without the power hungry maniac of an Akhenaten.
@geraldpolymath2 ай бұрын
Finally, the truth is told. Moses and Akhenaten are not the same person.
@richardlopez43182 ай бұрын
True. Because Moses never existed. He’s a fictional character.
@shayadayan33432 ай бұрын
Roughly 50 years apart
@josephwilliammarek9566Ай бұрын
I refer you to the writings of Ahmed Osman.
@jminor3182 ай бұрын
People got married YOUNG in Europe as well. This was not only happening inside of AFRICA.
@danielpfaff18022 ай бұрын
The word of truth carrying the cross and knowledge given from the Lord. <3 I love that it will come together one day. Job worked hard to be a good guy.
@jaydils96803 ай бұрын
Omg finally people are just starting to see a little light through the cracks of wisdom
@jophoenix39193 ай бұрын
Ahmed Osman did it first and i have all his books they are wonderful and the FIRST and by far the BEST written in 1987
@sandrasynar1358Ай бұрын
I have read Osman, but Sigmond Freud said it first that we know of
@tommytomtom3203 ай бұрын
Bible Schools and Bible Collages Teach religious Bias... If your using religion to prove religion. Your not proving anything but religious Biases... The Bible can't prove the Bible to be True. Again that is religious Bias... “Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence” was a Phrase made Popular by Carl Sagan Who Reworded Laplace's Principle, Which Says that “The Weight of Evidence for an Extraordinary Claim Must be Proportioned to its Strangeness” Witch means Claims and Evidence Have the Same Weight... Religions and Holy Books Does Not Do This... They Claim Supernatural Story's with No Real Evidence... The Bible is not a Scientific Text Book. Or is it a Historical Text Book. The Bible is a Book of Mythology... Examples are Fables, Fairy Tales, Folktales, Sagas, Epics, Legends, and Etiologic Tales (Which Refer to Causes or Explain Why a Thing is The Way It Is). Another form of Tale, the Parable, Differs from Myth in its Purpose and Character. Things That are Not To Be True... If you can't Understand this it's Not my Problem... “If you think you know everything, you’ll never learn anything,”
@stuj40392 ай бұрын
Prove your reasoning faculties are sound without using your reasoning faculties.
@tommytomtom3202 ай бұрын
@@stuj4039 Being Educated often Means Having a Critical Mindset. Simply Put, You Don’t Take Things For Granted and You Don’t Believe Stuff Just Because an Authority Figure or Book Says So. That Transfers to the Bible and Gods as Well: “It Says So in the Bible” Isn’t Automatically True for Someone with a Critical Mindset, and Things are not Necessarily Believable Just Because a Pastor Says It. The problem is that in Particular Islam and Christianity are Authoritative Religions. In Christianity, the Only Path to Heaven is to Accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, and in Islam, You Submit to Allah as Muhammad Revealed Through the Qur’an - The Word “Islam” Even Means “Submission”. The Natural Response From the Educated Critical Mind is, of Course, “Why?” And “Because Muhammad/Jesus/God/the Bible/the Qur’an Says So” Is Not a Valid Answer. Because We Had the Luxury of an Education That Afford us The Skills to Think Critically, Rationally, and Reasonably. This, in Turn, Allowed us to Objectively Read the Bible, Koran, Dhammapada, Vedas, and Other Scriptures and Holy Books. When that Happens We Often Reject the Claim That the Characters Found Within Being Educated Often Means Having a Critical Mindset. Simply Put, You Don’t Take Things for Granted and You Don’t Believe Stuff Just Because an Authority Figure or Book Says So. Because We had the Luxury of an Education that Afford us the Skills to Think Critically, Rationally, and Reasonably. This, in Turn, Allowed us to Objectively Read the Bible, Koran, Dhammapada, Vedas, and Other Scriptures and Holy Books. When that Happens We Often Reject the Claim that the Characters Found Within Exist in Reality. If So Many Highly Educated People Don’t Believe in God… Maybe It Is Because They Know Something You Don’t, It’s Because, Due to Their High Intelligence and Education, They Have Realized That All Gods Are Imaginary. Educated People Tend to Believe in Things That Can Be Proved and For Which There is Evidence. I don’t Believe in God for the Same Reason You Don’t Believe in Vampires, Faeries, Werewolves, Pegasus, Mermaids, and Numerous other Supernatural Beings from Myth, Folklore, and Fantasy. You Make an Exception for One Preferred Flavor of Myth; I don’t. I believe in the Power of Loving Kindness, Illuminated by Self-Reliance and Mindfulness. I Neither Need, Nor Desire, a Belief in Deities to Walk That Path. To Exist in Reality. “No amount of Evidence will Ever Persuade an Ignorant Person.” “If You Think You Know Everything, You’ll Never Learn Anything,”
@DrRemorse3 ай бұрын
20:01 so sad that in a college he point to the bust of nefertiti when the discoverer says himself its fake and a personnal idea of what the original might look like and not at all representative of her ... weird that details is left out
That opening anecdote is interesting. You may think that many newcomers get turned off because the singing/worship isn't reverent enough. But in my Baptist church, many newcomers don't come back after 1 visit. And quite a few of them say to the pastor/leadership team person that "the music isn't big budget, charismatic or Pentecostal enough". A Catch-22. You can't satisfy both groups of newcomers.
@JefferyHunt3 ай бұрын
I’m appreciating the book, at Peter Gentry’s recommendation, as I prepare sermons on Psalms.
@sethball13194 ай бұрын
Such a helpful walkthrough of Exodus!
@sethball13194 ай бұрын
Absolutely wonderful and quite convincing!
@dok90244 ай бұрын
What makes more sense is that the exodus took place under Amenhotep 2 and he died in the Red Sea. Another body was placed in his tomb. His first son died through the plague, the older brother of Akhenaten, probably Tutankhamen. And Akhenaton becomes pharaoh. But he looses his faith in Amun and worships his understanding of the God of Moses, the one God. He defaces reference to Amun. He depicts himself not as a god but as a human being in the artwork. That’s why his image is shown more realistic. He builds alters and sets himself as priest. He devoted his life for religion instead of ruling the nation. After his death Egypt reverts to Amun. This makes sense if you consider that he could have witnessed Moses the plagues and the power of God.
@deviantoutcast2 ай бұрын
In your mind, why would another body be placed in Amenhotep III's tomb? How would it be justified when considering the religious beliefs held at the time surrounding the afterlife and kingship? [You write "Amenhotep II", but I'm assuming that's a mistake on your part seeing how the third Amenhotep is the father of Akhenaten/Amenhotep IV, while Amenhotep II is Akhenaten's great grandfather.] I'm also curious to what evidence you're basing the idea that Akhenaten's older brother is "probably Tutankhamun"? For an Egyptologist - or someone who is knowledgeable of ancient Egyptian beliefs of the afterlife and the burial practices that were the direct result of said belief - I'm sad to say, it doesn't make any sense at all in the light of the mind of an ancient Egyptian to replace the body with someone else's in some odd cover-up/conspiracy attempt. Not in regards to any ancient Egyptian, and *_especially_* not in regards to the pharaoh! It would, in fact, make more sense to them to place *_a statue_* of the dead king in the tomb, than it would another dead body! And, even if we were to disregard the religious beliefs - the core doctrine of their entire worldview none the less! - of the ancients, we have the mummy (CG 61074, KV 35 room jb) of Amenhotep III, whose identity been concluded and established beyond resonable doubt with the application of multiple methodologies, using multiple technologies, and in multiple studies. Also, We know that Akhenaten's older brother was named Thutmose. We also know that Akhenaten was the father of Tutankhamun. Furthermore, we know that Tutankhamun was born in Amarna - the city built by Akhenaten - and that he ascended the throne after the death of Akhenaten's Great Royal Wife Nefertiti, who ruled Egypt, as a pharaoh in her own right, upon Akhenaten's death. We also know when both Akhenaten, and Tutankhamun, was born, as well as the years they ruled. All in all, in light of all the research data, all the evidence, that's been thoroughly analyzed and studied by numerous, dedicated, experts in multiple different countries around the world and spanning multiple scientific disciplines, over the past 100 years, to say that there's any sense, or reason in the narrative you're presenting would be far beyond the fathomable. *_And yet!_* I'm still curious to know your reasoning and the evidence you're using in support of your conclusions! Stay Safe, and Stay Sane! Cheers /Xenu Approves this Message
@user-dp9ch8xb5q4 ай бұрын
The monotheism of God is the basis of the call of all the prophets, as stated in the Qur’an. There are also anthropological studies of primitive tribes in Australia, the Red Indians, and African tribes that confirm the existence of the monotheism of God.
Пікірлер
Well, I put alot of weight on what Jesus said to Thomas, "Now that you see you believe. Blessed are those who believe without seeing." Those who 'believe without seeing' are of course the 5 wise with oil - who will be Raptured. Jesus promised that 'all who believe will live' . . . over & over again . . . OT & NT scriptures all leading to Revelation . . . the 144,000 will be evangelizing, the 2 witnesses, 3 angels fly through the heavens proclaiming the truth of the gospel over all the earth until all have heard - Tribulation Saints suddenly appear in heaven before the throne, a number so great that it cannot be counted & John does not recognize who they are . . . these are those "who believe now that they have seen", Prodicals who got indoctrinated away from what they were raised to believe, those who believe but were foolish, let themselves run out of oil, hesitated . . . God gives every possible opportunity to come to belief in Him & will by no means turn anyone away who comes to Him - anyone who does not take the mark of the beast, anyone who rejects the beast & false prophet & will not worship them, can come to believe & be saved! THIS is to put your trust in the LORD who made HIS plans & knows the heart of all.
I know the chronology does not seem to tine up, but just looking at the biblical narrative, if Ahkenaten had been the Pharaoh who Joseph had influenced, both the biblical narrative and the Egyptian narrative would have dovetailed nicely. The Israelite moving into Egypt, welcomed by Joseph and Akhenaten, then later despised by Ahkenaten's successor, probably taking the heat for Akhenaten's apostasy, according to the restored priesthood, then generations later escaping to Israel during a natural catastrophe. The two narratives would line up if we accepted that one or both of the timelines were inaccurate. Without that congruence the two narratives are so out of sync that they really don't make a lot of sense. According to the scriptures things were going great until a new Pharaoh took office, then they went from high favour to slavery, as if they were being held accountable for the past Pharaohs misdeeds. Perhaps they were. If Abraham was the first monotheist perhaps Joseph was who taught it to Ankenaten.
With the contradictions in time historically the idea Iochim (Hellene) or Ra Moshe (Kemetic) in the same part of the planet within fifty years of Henotheism presentation is absurd, calendars have been edited at least three times.
Great assembly of information ~
He is a great scholar.
The village of Sepp Horus became Sepphoris and in 1948 was torn down as Israel wanted to establish cultural history. The name was changed to Zippori yet it was the home and birth place of Ioanchim and Anna parents of Maria and grand parents of Isho the healer. In Hellene Khristos is a translation of the belief an Inorex will bring about a Khristos. Henotheism is a translation of Sumerian. Vedic texts.
Great message thanks Simon. Thank you for your encouragement.
It is true that there’s only one single reality, and thus one set of Universal principles of truth and morality (epistemology and ethics respectively) that Aristotle was on the right track towards discovering. Dual reality monotheism however, formalized by Plato, has gravely hampered the progress towards this discovery.
My Favorite New Testament Scholar
My Favorite New Testament
It's not about one God, but one Creation, and that is what the'Sun' disk represents.
Thank you for this timely word… I was feeling that I had reached an end to my usefulness because of my age and my physical condition 😊
Great message
1:06
I know very little about religion but in my own thoughts, the sun gives life, nurtures life, so wouldn't it be our creator?
Thanks be to God
WHICH IS BEST FOR ME? BACHELORS IN BIBLE AND THEOLOGY OR BACHELOR IN CHURCH LEADERSHIP
What about Sinuhe?
Tutmosis 🤫
I love Desi Alexander! 😊A phenomenal biblical scholar. Among other things, he's quite creative within the bounds of orthodoxy in his Genesis interpretations. For example, his position that when God clothed Adam and Eve after they had sinned, it was not to symbolize a cover for their sins with the Messiah's coming atonement, but it was to signify that Adam and Eve had become like the beasts. Also, arguing Canaan is the one whom Noah cursed, not Ham. He is a teacher who is "like the owner of a house who brings out of his storeroom treasures new and old" (Mt 13:52). I've already purchased his The Message of the Kingdom of God (published this year) and I'm working through it. I can't wait for his commentary on Genesis!
Y haplogroups a-h are pre-flood from Cannan. I-t are the 12 tribes of Israel. The entire house of Israel is saved. We got nothing to worry about so
4:20 but if thats so then monotheism doesnt exist. Yahwe never denied the existence of any of the gods, in fact he acknowledges them. Yahwe is seth a god who hates to see other gods being worshipped. Envy is his primary quality- look it up, sounds familiar? I am talking abt seth. So he knows they exist or existED as he- using the story of christ- actually succeeded in annihilating the pantheons of the pagan world. But the gods arent fully dead, just extremely weakened
The other "gods" are the fallen angels and starry host who sided with lucifer. Remember they got kicked out for their pride of not wanting to worship us.
wouldnt it be great it for once..... these sort of talk from a professor began with THE TRUTH. ie iwant to began this talk by saying. old testament charachers are mere metaphors they never existed.......
The weakest conclusion ever.
Give us the reason!
He literally ends with a meme lol what could be more weakest? He is very solid academician ofc tho
I be tankful . I ha ve answered all my dubs .MOses wAs apart and diferent of aton
Author Ahmed Osman argues that Moses WAS Akhenaten!
A scientist cannot speak objectively because they will take away the grants....money
Sigmond Freud said it before Osman
Thutmosis III was King David Amenhotep III was King Solomon Thutmosis IV/Akhenaten was Moses Don't go by bible timeline Find events in actual history and start there. Ahmed Osman blessed man of our times
Moses is Sunenmut, Pharoah’s Daughter is Hatchepsut, the Pharoah’s who died while Moses was in Midian was Thutmose III, the Pharoah of the Plagues was Amenhotep II, his successor, the NOT firstborn was Thutmose IV. Akhenaten began monotheism because the gods of Egypt had all died in the plagues and Egypt lost faith
@@bellydown29akhenantan let people out to Canaan ?
I recommend you read the Corpus Hermeticum. (This book was written by the Greeks in Alexandria between 100-300 BC with information received from Egyptian priests). You will see that some parts are similar to Akhenaten's religion. ''And though the Cosmos, that is to say the Sun, is also sire himself to them that share in him; yet so far is he not the cause of good unto the lives, he is not even of their living." ''Thou therefore, O Tat, my Son, pray first to the Lord and Father, and to the Alone and to the One from whom is one to be merciful to thee, that thou mayest knowest and understand so great a God; and that he would shine one of his BEAMS upon thee In thy understanding.'' ''The sun's the greatest god of gods in heaven; to whom all of the heavenly gods give place as unto king and master And he, this so−great one, he greater than the earth and sea, endures to have above him circling smaller stars than him. Out of respect to Whom, or out of fear of Whom, my son, [doth he do this]? '' At the end of the seminar, the professor says that the Aton religion has disappeared and there is no source left. How can he be that sure? Couldn't it be that some of Aton's priests secretly continued this religion that was abolished by Tutankhamon? In my opinion, this is one of the reasons why teachings such as Hermeticism are based on secrecy. In addition, the book shares many common points with the books of Abrahamic religions. Ramses II reigned 30 years after Akhenaten. Isn't this enough time for the adherents of a religion to increase secretly and attract attention, and perhaps be exiled from Egypt? I would love to hear answers to these questions from the Professor.
sun worship isnt the defining factor of akhenatens cult. All indoeuropean people worshipped the sun as the highest god, the swastika is the primary symbol for it, even today jesus is the main god of europe and he is a sun god as well(look up mithras for reference, the 25th of december is the time when the sun is in the middle of the star constellation crux or southern cross for 3 days before reascending. Jesus is the sun)
@@scrabbymcscrotus7481 I know Chistianity is based on Sun worship, islam is based on Moon worship and Akhenatens religion is more complex than only sun worship, I mentioned there are similarities between the Corpus Hermeticum (which is also not just sun whorship) and the abrahamic religions and Akhenatens religion. Just look how Hermes describes God's BEAMS while shine upon on his worshipers, and imagine the hyerogliphs how Sun shines and touches Akhenaten and Nefertiti with its beams with hands at the tips of each beam.
God bless you
❤👍
Akhenaten practiced monolatry, not monotheism.
So did the early Isaelites
Evangelic means biased with literal understanding of the Bible. And as Hillel already said: he who read and explains the Thora literal is a liar .
All men know there is one and only true God, the creator and moral governor of the universe. See Romans chapter 1:16-32. and why man deliberately suppresses this knowledge.
All the old pagan gods are real! The Abrahamic religions are false.
The irish magi were before all of them ie Druids(Arya)...they moved in all directions ...the bible is a twisted Roman / British church rip off of the irish original ...the 1st king Pharaoh menes is buried in Eire you can even visit it...he was going home after his reign ...theres nothing holy in the middle east the holy land is Eire ...the evidence is everywhere about it ...and covered up by academia and political powers
From the finds it is clear that the monotheistic doctrine of the heretical Pharaoh Akhenaten was the cause of malformation and desertification in contrast with the constitution of Egypt which depended on the prosperity of the Nile river!
Monotheism and its roots are the reason for inquisitions ,bloodshed, and wars. Lets not forget expulsions from Egypt
Amun Ra was an earlier monotheism and was practiced without the power hungry maniac of an Akhenaten.
Finally, the truth is told. Moses and Akhenaten are not the same person.
True. Because Moses never existed. He’s a fictional character.
Roughly 50 years apart
I refer you to the writings of Ahmed Osman.
People got married YOUNG in Europe as well. This was not only happening inside of AFRICA.
The word of truth carrying the cross and knowledge given from the Lord. <3 I love that it will come together one day. Job worked hard to be a good guy.
Omg finally people are just starting to see a little light through the cracks of wisdom
Ahmed Osman did it first and i have all his books they are wonderful and the FIRST and by far the BEST written in 1987
I have read Osman, but Sigmond Freud said it first that we know of
Bible Schools and Bible Collages Teach religious Bias... If your using religion to prove religion. Your not proving anything but religious Biases... The Bible can't prove the Bible to be True. Again that is religious Bias... “Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence” was a Phrase made Popular by Carl Sagan Who Reworded Laplace's Principle, Which Says that “The Weight of Evidence for an Extraordinary Claim Must be Proportioned to its Strangeness” Witch means Claims and Evidence Have the Same Weight... Religions and Holy Books Does Not Do This... They Claim Supernatural Story's with No Real Evidence... The Bible is not a Scientific Text Book. Or is it a Historical Text Book. The Bible is a Book of Mythology... Examples are Fables, Fairy Tales, Folktales, Sagas, Epics, Legends, and Etiologic Tales (Which Refer to Causes or Explain Why a Thing is The Way It Is). Another form of Tale, the Parable, Differs from Myth in its Purpose and Character. Things That are Not To Be True... If you can't Understand this it's Not my Problem... “If you think you know everything, you’ll never learn anything,”
Prove your reasoning faculties are sound without using your reasoning faculties.
@@stuj4039 Being Educated often Means Having a Critical Mindset. Simply Put, You Don’t Take Things For Granted and You Don’t Believe Stuff Just Because an Authority Figure or Book Says So. That Transfers to the Bible and Gods as Well: “It Says So in the Bible” Isn’t Automatically True for Someone with a Critical Mindset, and Things are not Necessarily Believable Just Because a Pastor Says It. The problem is that in Particular Islam and Christianity are Authoritative Religions. In Christianity, the Only Path to Heaven is to Accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, and in Islam, You Submit to Allah as Muhammad Revealed Through the Qur’an - The Word “Islam” Even Means “Submission”. The Natural Response From the Educated Critical Mind is, of Course, “Why?” And “Because Muhammad/Jesus/God/the Bible/the Qur’an Says So” Is Not a Valid Answer. Because We Had the Luxury of an Education That Afford us The Skills to Think Critically, Rationally, and Reasonably. This, in Turn, Allowed us to Objectively Read the Bible, Koran, Dhammapada, Vedas, and Other Scriptures and Holy Books. When that Happens We Often Reject the Claim That the Characters Found Within Being Educated Often Means Having a Critical Mindset. Simply Put, You Don’t Take Things for Granted and You Don’t Believe Stuff Just Because an Authority Figure or Book Says So. Because We had the Luxury of an Education that Afford us the Skills to Think Critically, Rationally, and Reasonably. This, in Turn, Allowed us to Objectively Read the Bible, Koran, Dhammapada, Vedas, and Other Scriptures and Holy Books. When that Happens We Often Reject the Claim that the Characters Found Within Exist in Reality. If So Many Highly Educated People Don’t Believe in God… Maybe It Is Because They Know Something You Don’t, It’s Because, Due to Their High Intelligence and Education, They Have Realized That All Gods Are Imaginary. Educated People Tend to Believe in Things That Can Be Proved and For Which There is Evidence. I don’t Believe in God for the Same Reason You Don’t Believe in Vampires, Faeries, Werewolves, Pegasus, Mermaids, and Numerous other Supernatural Beings from Myth, Folklore, and Fantasy. You Make an Exception for One Preferred Flavor of Myth; I don’t. I believe in the Power of Loving Kindness, Illuminated by Self-Reliance and Mindfulness. I Neither Need, Nor Desire, a Belief in Deities to Walk That Path. To Exist in Reality. “No amount of Evidence will Ever Persuade an Ignorant Person.” “If You Think You Know Everything, You’ll Never Learn Anything,”
20:01 so sad that in a college he point to the bust of nefertiti when the discoverer says himself its fake and a personnal idea of what the original might look like and not at all representative of her ... weird that details is left out
Great explanation
and Circumstance at the University: The Origin of the Honorary Degree February 2013European Review of History 20(1) DOI:10.1080/13507486.2012.742876 Authors: Pieter Dhondt University of Eastern Finland Download full-text PDF Citations (4) References (91) Abstract Opinion on the age and origin of the honorary degree differs according to the region under study and the criteria used to define what precisely constitutes an honorary promotion. By applying a flexible definition of the honorary degree, and combining existing research on the background and origin of early honorary degrees in different regions, this article aims to offer an answer to the question of the origin of the tradition of conferring honorary degrees. The giving and receiving of honorary degrees emerged in a variety of situations. Such degrees were awarded by popes and emperors - or their representatives - who wished to honour their ‘disciples’. They were also granted to meritorious professionals seeking a way around the strict rules for academic promotion via a promotion in absentia. And they were granted by universities wishing to benefit from the prestige of the celebrities they honoured, or which offered these degrees to professors without a doctoral degree, as a practical answer to the need for academic ceremonies and/or by way of thanks to their friends and benefactors. The emergence of the honorary promotion can only be explained through a combination of all these factors. ResearchGate Logo Discover the world's research 25+ million members 160+ million publication pages 2.3+ billion citations Join for free Public Full-text 1 Content uploaded by Pieter Dhondt Author content Content may be subject to copyright. A preview of the PDF is not available Citations (4) References (91) ... The awarding of this academic degree is still ongoing today, albeit with different practice contextualisation. Higher education institutions confer an honorary doctorate on someone deemed to have significantly contributed to developing a particular discipline or contributing to society or the public (Dhondt, 2013). As a degree-granting institution, the University has ignored all general requirements for general doctoral students, such as attendance, course credits, writing research proposals, dissertations, and passing comprehensive examinations. ... ... Studies on conferring honoris causa doctorates or honorary doctorates are still limited. Several scholars have studied honoris causa, such as Pollard (1941), Lady (1967), Haffernan and Jons (2007), Dhondt (2013Dhondt ( , 2014, Mudzakkir (2017), Badrun (2021) and Lee & Marshall (2021). These scholars mostly examine the giving of this academic practice using historical and sociological perspectives. ... ... From previous studies, Dhondt (2013) mapped out more comprehensively the practise of conferring honorary doctorates in the history of higher education. Based on his findings, the awarding of honorary degrees occurs in a variety of situations. ... The Policy of Honoris Causa Doctorate in Indonesian Higher Education (2000-2020) Article Full-text available Oct 2021 Moh MudzakkirMohammad Reevany BustamiIkomatussuniah IkomatussuniahWani Maler View Show abstract ... In practice however, the university fell back on an old custom to award an honorary doctorate to professors without a doctorate, to enable them to examine future doctors themselves and to grant doctoral degrees, as only a doctor could create a doctor (Epler, 1943, pp. 6-7;Dhondt, 2013). Eirikur Briem was one of them. ... ... See among other publications: Busch, 1959;Simpson, 1983. 5. The introduction of the honorary degree as an alternative for the ceremonious doctor promotions in order to add lustre to academic events is only one explanation in the history of the origin and development of the honorary degree (Dhondt, 2013). 6. Hwasser had been ill during the spring of 1840 and he did not want to interrupt his course of treatment in Stockholm to leave on a sea voyage to Helsinki. ... ... The rules governing the award of doctoral degrees dated from 1824, and stipulated that the University must in each case obtain royal permission to award the honorary doctoral degree, a provision not repealed until 1927. Partly this stipulation can also be explained by referring to the role of the king as one of the sources of the honorary doctoral degree at medieval and early modern European universities in general (Dhondt, 2013). 12. Academic assembly minutes, KU 13.01.01 ... Honorary Doctoral Degrees as Expressions of Political and Cultural Relationships at Nordic University Jubilees (1840-1911) Article Apr 2014Centaurus Pieter Dhondt View Show abstract Doktorat honoris causa i tradycja uniwersytecka Article Full-text available Dec 2020 Agnieszka Aleksandra Gromkowska-Melosik View Show abstract Naturalizing the centennial: History, memory, and the limits of human lifespans Article Jun 2020 Paul Morrow View Show abstract Recommended publications Discover more about: Celebrity Article The State of Robotics Education: Proposed Goals for Positively Transforming Robotics Education at Po... July 2017 · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine Joel M. Esposito This article presents the results of an online survey of faculty opinions on the state of robotics education with a focus on three topics: degree programs, introductory robotics courses, and educational resources. There were 67 institutions represented, the majority of which are doctoral granting universities located in the United States. I confirmed the existence of seven bachelor programs ... [Show full abstract] Read more Article Honorary Doctoral Degrees as Expressions of Political and Cultural Relationships at Nordic Universit... April 2014 · Centaurus Pieter Dhondt The traditional conferment of honorary doctorates on the occasion of university celebrations goes back to the beginning of the 19th century. However, particularly in Northern Europe, on the occasion of university jubilees, the solemn promotion of honorary doctors was still combined with the traditional and ceremonious interpretation of the normal doctor's promotion. Both ceremonies had its own ... [Show full abstract] Read more Article Full-text available Transnational currents in Finnish medical education (C. 1800-1920), starting from a 1922 discourse October 2012 · Paedagogica Historica Pieter Dhondt In Finnish historiography, received wisdom about increasing German influence in the universities throughout the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century prevails. However, along with the German neo-humanistic model, universities in Sweden and, particularly, Russia also played an important role in reforming the Finnish higher education system. Broadly speaking, medical ... [Show full abstract] View full-text Article Full-text available Doktorat honoris causa i tradycja uniwersytecka December 2020 · Studia Edukacyjne Agnieszka Aleksandra Gromkowska-Melosik The article is devoted to the analysis of the role of honoris causa doctorate in academic culture. The history of the honorary doctorate is reconstructed to a certain extent and the difference between the research doctorate and honoris causa is considered. Furthermore, the author focuses on the controversial issues connected with the honoris causa, including cases of buying or rejecting the honor ... [Show full abstract] View full-text Book Full-text available Un double compromis. Enjeux et débats relatifs à l'enseignement universitaire en Belgique au XIXe si... January 2011 Pieter Dhondt Ce livre a pour objet l'histoire des discussions relatives à l'enseignement universitaire en Belgique, depuis la suppression de l'ancienne université de Louvain en 1797 jusqu'à la promulgation des lois organiques sur l'enseignement supérieur dans les années 1890 et 1891. Plusieurs questions y sont envisagées comme le nombre et la localisation des universités, les conditions d'entrée, le programme ... [Show full abstract] View full-text ResearchGate Logo Join for free Login App Store Get it on Google Play Company About us News Careers Support Help Center Business solutions Advertising Recruiting © 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. TermsPrivacyCopyrightImprint
Doctor of Philosophy
That opening anecdote is interesting. You may think that many newcomers get turned off because the singing/worship isn't reverent enough. But in my Baptist church, many newcomers don't come back after 1 visit. And quite a few of them say to the pastor/leadership team person that "the music isn't big budget, charismatic or Pentecostal enough". A Catch-22. You can't satisfy both groups of newcomers.
I’m appreciating the book, at Peter Gentry’s recommendation, as I prepare sermons on Psalms.
Such a helpful walkthrough of Exodus!
Absolutely wonderful and quite convincing!
What makes more sense is that the exodus took place under Amenhotep 2 and he died in the Red Sea. Another body was placed in his tomb. His first son died through the plague, the older brother of Akhenaten, probably Tutankhamen. And Akhenaton becomes pharaoh. But he looses his faith in Amun and worships his understanding of the God of Moses, the one God. He defaces reference to Amun. He depicts himself not as a god but as a human being in the artwork. That’s why his image is shown more realistic. He builds alters and sets himself as priest. He devoted his life for religion instead of ruling the nation. After his death Egypt reverts to Amun. This makes sense if you consider that he could have witnessed Moses the plagues and the power of God.
In your mind, why would another body be placed in Amenhotep III's tomb? How would it be justified when considering the religious beliefs held at the time surrounding the afterlife and kingship? [You write "Amenhotep II", but I'm assuming that's a mistake on your part seeing how the third Amenhotep is the father of Akhenaten/Amenhotep IV, while Amenhotep II is Akhenaten's great grandfather.] I'm also curious to what evidence you're basing the idea that Akhenaten's older brother is "probably Tutankhamun"? For an Egyptologist - or someone who is knowledgeable of ancient Egyptian beliefs of the afterlife and the burial practices that were the direct result of said belief - I'm sad to say, it doesn't make any sense at all in the light of the mind of an ancient Egyptian to replace the body with someone else's in some odd cover-up/conspiracy attempt. Not in regards to any ancient Egyptian, and *_especially_* not in regards to the pharaoh! It would, in fact, make more sense to them to place *_a statue_* of the dead king in the tomb, than it would another dead body! And, even if we were to disregard the religious beliefs - the core doctrine of their entire worldview none the less! - of the ancients, we have the mummy (CG 61074, KV 35 room jb) of Amenhotep III, whose identity been concluded and established beyond resonable doubt with the application of multiple methodologies, using multiple technologies, and in multiple studies. Also, We know that Akhenaten's older brother was named Thutmose. We also know that Akhenaten was the father of Tutankhamun. Furthermore, we know that Tutankhamun was born in Amarna - the city built by Akhenaten - and that he ascended the throne after the death of Akhenaten's Great Royal Wife Nefertiti, who ruled Egypt, as a pharaoh in her own right, upon Akhenaten's death. We also know when both Akhenaten, and Tutankhamun, was born, as well as the years they ruled. All in all, in light of all the research data, all the evidence, that's been thoroughly analyzed and studied by numerous, dedicated, experts in multiple different countries around the world and spanning multiple scientific disciplines, over the past 100 years, to say that there's any sense, or reason in the narrative you're presenting would be far beyond the fathomable. *_And yet!_* I'm still curious to know your reasoning and the evidence you're using in support of your conclusions! Stay Safe, and Stay Sane! Cheers /Xenu Approves this Message
The monotheism of God is the basis of the call of all the prophets, as stated in the Qur’an. There are also anthropological studies of primitive tribes in Australia, the Red Indians, and African tribes that confirm the existence of the monotheism of God.