Пікірлер

• 
  @generalgrievous4942Күн бұрын

  What am i doing wrong man im following it and i fail everytime

• 
  @user-dn4ll6jy8u2 күн бұрын

  Well x3⚡️⚡️

• 
  @boneman97512 күн бұрын

  I don’t mind it being slow, I just don’t like that I’m losing advisors and I’m basically on a time limit. I’d rather be able to liberate people from gulags at a cost of increasing paranoia

• 
  @littlecoma3203 күн бұрын

  whats wrong with them putting 2 units on the capital?

• 
  @moodycxnt3 күн бұрын

  After 800 hrs I got the relevant DLC and played as Ethiopia, I realised that with a combination of waiting and pinning down certain enemies on the south, you can actually cap the ports and encircle their troops within (if I remember correctly) 12 days, which prevents Italy's incoming reinforcements from landing.

• 
  @carnelianexile3 күн бұрын

  I used to load up a game as Ethiopia every so often, because the war was kinda fun to play as a short campaign. The two units in Aussa have actually stopped me doing that, as it makes reinforce memes so much more frequent as you'll mostly need to juggle forces more frequently. I've seen the Carlists in Spain rise up a couple of times on historical, and at least one early war Italian naval invasion of Britain too. Neither of these happened much less frequently than an Ethiopia AI win, although if it was only the last few patches, I may have missed a sudden uptick.

• 
  @jeremyglass42833 күн бұрын

  the thing is, the secret path for Poland is way better than both, and it gets you the same focuses wit the commonwealth, so there is little reason to do these.

• 
  @MartinHutasoit093 күн бұрын

  Lend-lease nerf is way worse than 2 divs on Aussa. You really stuck at the game with gun deficit and no ones going to help you until Germany invades Poland 😤

• 
  @BubblesZest3 күн бұрын

  I mean there is gun purchases in the LoN tree and the free 10k in the Soviet tree, and you could just rush scavenging tactics. It ain't great sure, but it ain't the end of the world.

• 
  @MartinHutasoit093 күн бұрын

  @@BubblesZest Considering that any path gives you guns at some point, yeah that makes sense. Any recommendation for path thats fun post war? Like I dont really like to just exit the game after the white peace.

• 
  @doctorwhat7793 күн бұрын

  Great work. Can you make something about Ethiopia exile paths comparison?

• 
  @owand50173 күн бұрын

  Nice background music!

• 
  @HokushoSociety3 күн бұрын

  Idk when it happened but before Italy would never call in germany to the war with ethiopia but if you play the civil war out long enough to have the colonies rise up Italy calls in the whole axis

• 
  @marioc.81493 күн бұрын

  is it possible to do something like this with Poland and its "Prepare for the Inevitable" branch? I want to do it with Karl Albrecht as leader without capitulating

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  Gonna be a bit of an contrarian, but i like Aussa spawning divisions when it gets annexed by Italy, before the change, the event annex which is supposed to be a positive thing for Italy was mostly a good thing for Ethiopia as you got excellent defensive terrain from it, a free military factory and Italy had to occupy and push from 2 desert tiles, one of the worst terrains in the game to be in.

• 
  @BubblesZest3 күн бұрын

  The problem with that though is that this change fails the "Does it make the game more fun?" test. A good Italy player could already win without those extra units, just use your air and you'll be okay. Pin Ethiopia's divisions if you must. And for Ethiopia all it does is make it a worse experience, they already had to deal with the lend-lease nerf, the constant threat of reinforce memes and now this. I think one extra mil and a good tile to defend is fine, gameplay balance wise.

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  @@BubblesZest Lets be honest, doing a "is this change fun" test for most things is shit, nerfs are almost never fun but still they happen often, you can find a good amount of people that cry about how many additions to the game are too confusing or hard and thus, not fun. Ethiopia is piss easy to win as if your anything above a beginner, this change does nothing to that, also the change is not targeted towards Italy players, they never had a problem with the war but to address how an event annexing a country that is meant to be a negative to Ethiopia, open a surprise front For Italy to use and let the try and get a foothold in the inner parts of Ethiopia was really just a free factory delivery to the Ethiopian player.

• 
  @BubblesZest3 күн бұрын

  "This change does nothing to that" Except, you know. Taking away 33% of Ethiopia's mils, who also starts in a massive deficit which only grows thanks lack of air. The way it was before both Italy and Ethiopia _could_ take advantage of the annexation if either was quick enough, which was fair. Sure maybe made the wording of one event slightly inaccurate, but that's nothing new for this game. And yeah, the change is clearly targeted for the ai as I said. It's just not the right solution, but it's the one Paradox went for as it was the quickest they could find.

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  @@BubblesZest Before it was always just a good thing for Ethiopia, as their troops were always closer to the new free defensive tile that´s undefended, i don´t think Italy could have even gotten to it outside of them already pushing next to it. For the mills, sure it slows you down, but at the same time your only making basic guns and each of the paths has a "tons of free guns" focus except for annachist and fascist, but one flips so it dosen´t matter and anarchists is meant to be the hardest one to win, also it has the easiest time getting rid of "conservative high command" so it balances out somewhat. Ethiopian main strategy remains the same, you still hold the same lines and tiles, you just have to adjust your hold on tile to the two behind it, which funny enough is better as Italy´s supply goes even worse, pushing them back just gets harder.

• 
  @someother55123 күн бұрын

  I have found pushing in the south is easier than in the north. Try micro a blitz to surround a port (don't take) in the south and then let Italy lose all its divisions by constantly destroying the reinforcements it sends to the port. Soon enough Italy will have no army left and taking the north will be easy.

• 
  @BubblesZest3 күн бұрын

  streamable.com/7wnvyx Cut because it ruined the flow of the scenes around it.

• 
  @MartinHutasoit093 күн бұрын

  I have tried doing this with Mogadishu port, surrounded by 7 irregular divs Yeah that turned out to be just WW1 lmao, cant even destroy the divs in the port

• 
  @JDothan3 күн бұрын

  Dude I just did this too, too funny. Couldn’t quite push them out until WT was high enough to get some LL. They never walked out of Aussa so I was at a bit of a disadvantage compared to yours. Fun stuff

• 
  @cameronmcgregor25833 күн бұрын

  I think if you have a bog standard frontline they don't ever walk out but they usually but not always walk out when you surround them with fallback lines

• 
  @ryankline11643 күн бұрын

  So scavenging has a small default value? I thought that it only worked with maintenance companies.

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  Scavenging work with maintenance or/and the scavenger trait for generals, with out either there is no capture rate to my knowledge.

• 
  @royale76203 күн бұрын

  When did the lend lease get nerfed? You cant improve opinion with anyone now anymore and get free stuff? :(

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  You can improve but lend lease has a higher world tension limit than before, so you can´t get any early into a game.

• 
  @royale76203 күн бұрын

  @@Thedefenses ah ok thx

• 
  @generalgrievous25804 күн бұрын

  1:29 AHH🔊AHH🔊AHH🔊good🇬🇧

• 
  @vitorsoriano54404 күн бұрын

  I survivade as finland now a want to try as ethiopia

• 
  @me3473 күн бұрын

  It’s much easier as Ethiopia

• 
  @bonjourcoucou53284 күн бұрын

  I think the scavenging effect only improves already existing scavenging effects, so you go from 3% from the leader trait to 4.2%.

• 
  @BubblesZest4 күн бұрын

  Yeah that's what I heard too.

• 
  @x-uca74654 күн бұрын

  Doesn't scavenging only work if you're attacking?

• 
  @BubblesZest4 күн бұрын

  Considering I got equipment when I switched to a scavenger, no. It works both ways. Still kinda annoying that I didn't get a single piece of equipment until I switched over to them, but that's hoi4.

• 
  @slava3136304 күн бұрын

  Without lend lease and "free" mill in Aussa - pretty good focus anyway.

• 
  @x-uca74654 күн бұрын

  @@BubblesZest I think it’s most effective in encirclements and attacking still

• 
  @Thedefenses3 күн бұрын

  @@x-uca7465 same effectiveness for all but due to working off how much equipment the enemy lost, its most effective when closing encirclement due to the enemy losing all their equipment, also as the equipment goes first into your divisions and after that your stockpile, defending or attacking your not gonna notice it most of the time due to your divisions using most or all of the equipment they capture.

• 
  @x-uca74653 күн бұрын

  @@Thedefenses Pretty much what I was arguing but yeah 😂

• 
  @enriquegarcia72074 күн бұрын

  Amazing content!!!!!!!!!!!

• 
  @BubblesZest4 күн бұрын

  When I finished filming this I thought it was a lot longer than it actually was, the main body of the recording was only 76 minutes long. But when you consider that playing Ethiopia usually requires going down to speed four for a significant period of time. I guess it makes sense.

• 
  @a_person_of_all_time5 күн бұрын

  I assume you can still do both Greater Italy and Mere Nostrum with the Pope path

• 
  @animeXcaso7 күн бұрын

  What is the point of bringing back democracy in the party?

• 
  @user-fb4zu8td6c8 күн бұрын

  Good. We neeed serius update here

• 
  @theexecutiveassociated8 күн бұрын

  1946 ouch

• 
  @DragonMasterRH8 күн бұрын

  I think both paths should eventually allow you to peacefully negotiate with the UK and France for French territories

• 
  @beefyblom9 күн бұрын

  frankly the german civil war focus tree needs a blanket nerf

• 
  @thatcharlotte32489 күн бұрын

  13:52 I assume the decisions are for the AI. The AI doesn’t usually justify unless given claims/cores, and as such the decisions would offer a simple way for the Soviet AI to be more aggressive.

• 
  @BubblesZest9 күн бұрын

  I'm tired of this "made for the ai" excuse, even if it were true it would just make the left opposition look worse. Why make the main upside of a tree only something the ai can use? Just silly.

• 
  @viligerm65929 күн бұрын

  TrotskyFortress2

• 
  @pootispow7919 күн бұрын

  Thx didn’t realize the tf2 summer update was out

• 
  @avrgbritishguy10 күн бұрын

  Yoooo I was the exactly 1000th person to like the video

• 
  @rauhau_10 күн бұрын

  (:

• 
  @Mrcoffe-xw8gz10 күн бұрын

  Just one thing, the decisions to steer the masses don't only give you war goals. After they are done you have a decision to spaw additonal divisions in enemy territory, kinda like soviet partisants. It's not a game changer but it's something.

• 
  @ruansteenkamp428910 күн бұрын

  The consumer good factor thing isn’t even a good thing for the right side anymore since you cap out at a certain point regardless of nation On the “Permanent Revolution”, it’s a lot better than the Austro-Hungary tree that only gives claims

• 
  @corvo_..10 күн бұрын

  why do you talk sooo femininely? not that im complaining of course, im hard as shit.

• 
  @Veniczar_pa10 күн бұрын

  Actually, Trotsky as a leader is a bad pick. Since you don't get him as an advisor. And he has a very strong +10% army organization buff in his advisor slot. And he does not take up a military advisor slot either. Practically nullifying the Soviet Union's Initial army organization debuff (I guess you can get it later by switching to the supreme soviet) I don't like the left opposition path but I think it has strong military potential both for early-game USSR and late-game USSR after you remove the org debuffs, I think that was the intention with the 15% attack for a year. You are meant to early game rush everyone as much as possible and just attack attack attack attack attack with no build-up and abandonment of the 5 year plan.

• 
  @jeremyglass428310 күн бұрын

  Considering the Consumer goods rework, I think left opposition is better than the right, just not as good as historical

• 
  @juncheok857910 күн бұрын

  Wait, what rework?

• 
  @azh69810 күн бұрын

  ​@@juncheok8579The consumer goods reduction is not additive anymore, it's a multiplier that is applied to the expected number of factories from your economy law. This means it's almost impossible to get 0% consumer goods anymore.

• 
  @kermoots926110 күн бұрын

  @@azh698 It is still additive, it's just the introduction of "Consumer goods *factor"*. If it only says consumer goods, it's still additive. The factor however, is a percentage based of your main consumer goods value. For example, if you have 30% consumer goods, a -20% consumer goods factor would be (30 * 0.8), which gives a total of -6%. This is exactly how recruitable population works as well, since you have your recruitable population percentage, but then there's also the recruitable population factor as well. This means that the higher base value on both of them, the better the factor(s) are going to be, but it's always way more worth to decrease your base consumer goods value than to keep it high with your consumer goods factor bonuses. That being said, there are still some focuses, advisors etc on some countries that give + or - on just consumer goods, which then is additive.

• 
  @dogan195410 күн бұрын

  Not going to lie, there really isnt much to like about the left opposition. Its unique focus branch at the bottom which lets you release countries isnt really good. And the most you can get is some wargoals. In my opinion, the centre path is just much better. (Tho the left opposition ussr name is very cool)