The John Locke Foundation employs research, journalism, and outreach programs to transform government through competition, innovation, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. JLF seeks a better balance between the public sector and private institutions of family, faith, community, and enterprise. The John Locke Foundation was created in 1990 as an independent, nonprofit think tank that would work "for truth, for freedom, and for the future of North Carolina."
Пікірлер
Great talk
Voter ID laws are not only not racist, but are necessary for a legitimate and secure election. An election without Voter ID required is illegitimate and it will not be accepted by We The People. 🇺🇸
"co2 is not a control knob that can fine tune climate..." judith curry, atmospheric scientist.
"Michael Mann made" global warming
"Michael Mann made" global warming
CO2 is plant food
That the Jews were not moneylenders is the real myth !!! Christians and Muslims were prohibited by their religions to practice usury !!! But the Jews can be usurers to gentiles but not with a fellow jew !!! This woman is a great liar !!!
I refer to the medieval era and not to the modern era !!! If we abolish usury today we will abolish capitalism !!!
Why do they say it'll be a runaway greenhouse effect if that didn't happen when there was 3 times as much for millions of years? Rhetorical question for libs... and yes it's political, propaganda pushes the end of the world crap. Fear is a great motivator, and a good way to demonize all critics and even truth. The sun is about 98% of the heat. We can't measure it, not completely, it's chaos. The orbits also.. there's a slight perturbation. They never say anything about that. They never say they don't know either. They claim 97% of scientists agree (that's a lie, 97% do what? Believe in climate change? Well gee golly the climate always changes as demonstrated) They call it fossil fuels. That's misleading. It's found all around the universe. Fact!!! we aren't even close to running out. That started in the late 1800s at the Geneva Convention and by that rich dude who owned trains and transported oil, it was a marketing strategy. What's his name? LOL I can't remember everything geez I know his name hahahaha. Starts with R(?) Hyper rich dude..
1. Being a jerk won't change anyone's mind. 2. Yes, people ARE censored for claiming "climate change" is a hoax etc. They also demonizing and will call you "MAGA" "right wing" etc etc etc (be honest, we see it all the time, left wing censorship, accusations of racist, sexist, homophobic etc etc etc) Don't blindly trust media. I just went through my channels on TV and PBS came up.. (example) EVERY single topic they talked about was left wing biased and either lies or omits important details or was simply false. 100% propaganda. Who funds propaganda? Find out... it's insane. And we all see every single main news station like NBC, ABC, CNN etc (except Fox, who used to be full of crap, or was it though(?)). New York Times etc etc Wall Street Joural.. lies lies lies. Lots of narratives that leave out important details (such as cops on blacks, the stats speak for themselves and propaganda blatantly lies and pushes stories to make us all rage). They've done studies.. racism is on life suport by democrats. FACT.. I knew there'd be a war in the middle east when I saw protests!!!!! Wait until your older, it's soooo obvious. I'm 44. I watched how they try to sway our minds before it even happens. Sick. All that death and these jerks want votes and power!!!!
Its changed from global warming to climate change i feel soon they will need to change it again. As George carlin said and I agree, " I cant wait for that astroid or comet to hit the earth so maybe a new species can take the ranes.
She forgot her interests in boosting her Raytheon stock portfolio
We are suffering more from Petro pollution, and I don’t mean in the air
We should not diminish the fact that we’re putting toxins all over the ground and then the water localized that is an issue
And what happened to ozone
Absolutely I love CO2
CO2 is an exchange gas. It was Frenchman Eugene Howdry who invented the catalytic convert for car exhausts circ. 1973 that turned Carbon Monoxide poison (CO) into Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Up to then every city on Earth was smothered in a cloud of SMOG causing eye and breathing problems, headaches, lung issues etc - today the skies are blue but our youth who weren't there have nothing to compare today's sky with. The catalytic converter was nothing more than a metal chamber containing wafers of rare earth minerals that at engine temp. produced a wind of CO2 from the engines exhaust passing through it - in went the CO and out came the CO2 the only source of carbon for plants.
Here is what an evangelical scholar says about the conquest of Canaan, Digging for Answers Biblical Archaeologists are about as certain as you can be about these things that the conquest of Canaan as the Bible describes did not happen: no mass invasion from the outside by an Israelite army and no extermination of Canaanites as God commanded One thing archaeologists can tell us is whether or not a city was violently destroyed by outside invaders and whether a new group of people took up residence, Battle and destructions of cities leave archaeological footprints - things like soot(if the town was burned0, weapons, smashed pottery, and human bones. Mass migrations of people groups as the Bible describes with Israel entering Canaan would cause some cultural upheaval and leave some sort of remains for archaeologists to dig up and write long books about to help them get tenure. Remember those thirty-one Canaanite towns listed in the Book of Joshua (plus other towns on either side of the Jordan River)? Sixteen towns were destroyed according to the stories in the books of Numbers, Joshua and Judges. Of those sixteen, two or three maybe four cities show signs of violent desctruction at or around the time when Joshua and his army would have been ploughing through Canaan(thirteenth centuryBCE about 200 years before the time of King David)). That’s it The towns on the other side of the Jordan River, in Moab, don’t look like they were even occupied at the time. We also read in the Bible that twelve towns were taken over without a fight. But of those twelve only seven were even occupied at the time , according to archaeological findings. And of those same twelve towns that the Bible says weren’t destroyed, three actually do show signs of destruction. In other words, archaeology and the biblical story don’t line up well at all. Jericho, the first of the towns to be razed in the Book of Joshua, is the most famous example. Not only was Jericho minimally inhabited at the best of time, but it had no massive protective walls, which means the biblical story of the “walls of Jericho” tumbling down - at least that’s what a hundred years of digging there has shown us. What most everyone is certain about however, is that the Bible;’s version of events is not what happened. And that puts the question “How could God have all those Canaanites put to death?” in a different light, indeed. He didn’t. From Peter Enns The Bible Tells Me So, pp. 58-60 HarperOne , 2015.
From i understand, we now have as death tax in NC
We are taking the oil out on purpose
Wish the cameraman was better at his job
He was drunk.
This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet.
"there is no mechanism" Are you out of your ignorant mind? Where the fuck you get that fantasy? You know fucking ANYTHING about science at all? All your learning from your degree in Hair Styling? Go back, because you fucking FLUNKED.
Co2 naudingos dujos todėl jei jų sumažėja ? tada augalai ir planktonai jaučiasi blogiau !
It's INCREASING you ignoramus.
Co2 gas protect earth from Solar radiation !
Su foto šopu galima bet kokią nuotrauką sukurti ypač tų kurie išmoko gerai dirbti su juo, yra ir video programų panašių ten kuria irgi visokių feikų !.
So climate change is "fake?"
Notice how screaming about CO2, Carbon and "cLiMaTe cHaNgE" is propped up and funded by the same entities and govts that are actively driving our economies, standards and education off a cliff.
That's right! Not like the Fossil Fuel Narrative is "actively driving our economies" you incredible moron. Last anyone knows YOU stuck that nozzle up your tank and filled up with GAS. IDIOT.
Ffs
Good point, the real racist bigots are those who don't want black kids to learn the skills to get a job and prosper.
It's racist to think we're not all human. It doesn't matter what race you are. If you're stupid you're stupid. Can't change shit to make stupid people look better..
Your Foundation is intriguing but definitely not a venue to help African-Americans. We scanned your website themes, none regarding fighting racism, ending gentrification, voting rights for African-Americans, ending the exploitation of Africa, or empowering marginalized students. You're not as bad as the Klan but you're definitely not going to help poorer black people.
Your Foundation is intriguing but definitely not a venue to help African-Americans. We scanned your website themes, none regarding fighting racism, ending gentrification, voting rights for African-Americans, ending the exploitation of Africa, or empowering marginalized students. You're not as bad as the Klan but you're definitely not going to help poorer black people.
Mark Robinson
Lol blatant lies
Mark. Only choice
It’s because USA heavily sanctioned the Venezuela
What horrible dishonest BS. ANYTHING… can be a pollutant in the wrong place or in the wrong amount or if it has negative consequences. Gasoline is a pollutant in your water… and water is a pollutant in your gas tank. CO2 nourishes plants but it also traps heat. More CO2 means more heat. No matter what the baseline is, adding more makes it warmer and adding too much… as we have… makes it too warm.
Yes, more CO2 does increase warming, but only so much. Not enough to constitute a "climate crisis". Not even close.
@@KelliAnnWinkler: Well, a century of climate science says otherwise. There are actual formulas for this. "So much" can be too much for us. -“MET Office UK, Causes of climate change” -"Columbia Climate School, How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?" -“MIT, How do greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere? -NASA: Vital Signs, Global Temperature -NASA: Watching the Land Temperature Bell Curve Heat Up
@@lrvogt1257 Yes, there are tons of articles and papers like the ones you cited. But, where is the actual empirical science that confirms the "climate crisis". I would be interested in seeing the formula you refer to that "says otherwise". Can you provide it?
@@KelliAnnWinkler : That's BS. you've moved the goal posts like most deniers do. I didn't say the formula showed a crisis. I said the formula shows how to project warming. Look it up yourself unless you're to intellectually lazy. I know the sort seen this kind of disingenuousness a thousand times. Any authority will be dismissed for some specious reason so I know it's a waste of time. Just look at the trajectory of temperature. before and after the use of fossil fuels began and in the modern record (NASA Vital Signs global temperature) It's not only accelerated dramatically but contrary to natural trends. Look at that moving bell curve I sent you. WMO reports extreme events have increased 5-fold in 50 years. You'll promote your agenda for your own purposes but others should look to real science.
@@KelliAnnWinkler Just plain fucking wrong. SHOW me YOUR fucking MATH proving your statement. Hard to do that with your degree in Hair Styling isn't it?
Mark Robinson God is With Him He Will Win❤️❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍👍
Affordable Care Act WHO WOULD QUILIFY 178,000 In North Carolina = 51%White, 49% Color, 60%Work and still Qualify. ARP- The American Rescue Plan offers $ARP- 1.7 Billion a year additional FEDERAL MONEY to the State of North Carolina to offset Expenses should it expand Medicaid. To qualify for Medicaid in North Carolina, parents must earn less than 39% of the federal poverty line (or less than $8,982 for a family of three annually).
And it took 10 years for North Carolina to join Obama Care March 2024! Welcome aboard folks!
Here’s the simple solution to any claim that “math’s racist” - pass a law that anyone making this claim has no legal recourse if affected in any way by a math error. If a doctor prescribes a wrong dosage - the “math-is-racist” believer cannot sue for malpractice. If a car crashes, or a bridge collapses, due to a mathematical error in its engineering: no lawsuit, no class-action suit, no legal settlement for the “math-is-racist” believer. Likewise for the “punctuality-is-racist” believer, the “literacy-is-racist” believer, the “accuracy-is-racist” and so on - anyone who believes that a concept or a skill is racist (or is otherwise wrong) should not expect to gain from the existence of that concept or the competent application of that skill. Who are we, after all - we who benightedly believe that math isn’t wrong, literacy isn’t wrong, punctuality isn’t wrong, accuracy isn’t wrong - to impose our beliefs, to impose our lived experience of benefiting from such concepts and such skills, on any or all of the people who disagree? 😉
Here’s the simple solution to any claim that “math’s racist” - pass a law that anyone making this claim has no legal recourse if affected in any way by a math error. If a doctor prescribes a wrong dosage - the “math-is-racist” believer cannot sue for malpractice. If a car crashes, or a bridge collapses, due to a mathematical error in its engineering: no lawsuit, no class-action suit, no legal settlement for the “math-is-racist” believer. Likewise for the “punctuality-is-racist” believer, the “literacy-is-racist” believer, the “accuracy-is-racist” and so on - anyone who believes that a concept or a skill is racist (or is otherwise wrong) should not expect to gain from the existence of that concept or the competent application of that skill. Who are we, after all - we who benightedly believe that math isn’t wrong, literacy isn’t wrong, punctuality isn’t wrong, accuracy isn’t wrong - to impose our beliefs, to impose our lived experience of benefiting from such concepts and such skills, on any or all of the people who disagree? 😉
Here’s the simple solution to any claim that “math’s racist” - pass a law that anyone making this claim has no legal recourse if affected in any way by a math error. If a doctor prescribes a wrong dosage - the “math-is-racist” believer cannot sue for malpractice. If a car crashes, or a bridge collapses, due to a mathematical error in its engineering: no lawsuit, no class-action suit, no legal settlement for the “math-is-racist” believer. Likewise for the “punctuality-is-racist” believer, the “literacy-is-racist” believer, the “accuracy-is-racist” and so on - anyone who believes that a concept or a skill is racist (or is otherwise wrong) should not expect to gain from the existence of that concept or the competent application of that skill. Who are we, after all - we who benightedly believe that math isn’t wrong, literacy isn’t wrong, punctuality isn’t wrong, accuracy isn’t wrong - to impose our beliefs, to impose our lived experience of benefiting from such concepts and such skills, on any or all of the people who disagree? 😉
A step-by-step guide on how to apply: www.ncseaa.edu/k12/opportunity/how-to-apply-for-the-opportunity-scholarship/
The simple answer to teachers who claim that math is racist: calculate their paychecks wrong … with the errors NOT in their favor. Take it farther: make a law that nobody who regards math as racist has any legal recourse when he or she is injured by anyone’s mathematical error.
Ridiculously gorgeous!
Read more: www.johnlocke.org/reservations-for-7-billion-the-general-assemblys-budgetary-reserve-shell-game/
People who were o social security took out loans lm sure these folk i trouble
The firearms prohibitions should be based on dangerousness, not based on virtue. Justice Amy Barrett dissented on Kanter v. Barr while on the 7th Circuit for this same issue.
This guy is a numb.
Spot on. How 'bout yourself??
Nikole Hannah Jones has really ticked off the history deniers! 😁 The so-called Founding Fathers created this country with the enslavement of Africans woven into it. That cannot be changed. Deny it all you want. My hope is that Nikole continues to shed light on the history of the USA.
Dr. Happer speaks the truth. Bless you Sir.
He speaks the WEATHER. And is PAID by the fossil fuel industry to do so. And it obviously achieves it's intended purpose, to confuse the CLIMATE MAGA Morons. Why don't you go ask Dr. HappyHorseShit about the 2,400 gigatons of co2 that we have pumped into the atmosphere so far? Go ask him to SHOW you HIS climate model that forecasts warming. ?
@@mrunning10Why don't you show us exactly how a 2 part in 10,000 part increase in atm CO2 over a 100 year time span constitutes a "climate crisis" with actual scientific evidence? Climate models are NOT empirical science.