Пікірлер

• 
  @ejack4961Ай бұрын

  Yay… finally people who can dance 😊

• 
  @user-cn9nj1yf8rАй бұрын

  I would love to go back 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

• 
  @PoeticJusticeSC2 ай бұрын

  We need a name for this style of country dancing. It's definitely country, and definitely dance, but it's not two step. The swing moves in between are swing (or Country Swing), but the forward, forward, back movement seems relatively common but I haven't found a definitive source to say what it should be called.

• 
  @anonymous1.0533 ай бұрын

  Cool I like how it started to snow to

• 
  @rob-ge7wz3 ай бұрын

  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 so dumb

• 
  @HarleyCutright3 ай бұрын

  She’s tall asf

• 
  @user-alreadydead3 ай бұрын

  Badass! I can't do that😢

• 
  @user-qb8xb7ob1j4 ай бұрын

  You don't stop in the two-step people would run into you from behind the two-step whatever turns you make you make them while you're going counterclockwise along with the rest of everybody else on the dance floor that you're not in a competition here you're two step is not a competition dance it's intended to be a march with 200 people on the dance floor all moving counterclockwise at the same speed you teach him the stuff and then they think they're supposed to do this in the nightclub no no no no no no no no no no no no you're marching it's just like square dancing square

• 
  @joenevin37466 ай бұрын

  Solid content and professional production, thanks!

• 
  @2ADADDY6 ай бұрын

  Thanks Joe! We appreciate the support 🙏🏼

• 
  @amandahastings50146 ай бұрын

  Truth is the key to freedom. Praying the light of God’s countenance will expose everything corrupt officials are hiding in the darkness. Great job! #benzozombies - like that!

• 
  @garima54876 ай бұрын

  Which song

• 
  @HunterTMounce6 ай бұрын

  Awesome video from an awesome crew!

• 
  @ScottRandolph-dd7dr6 ай бұрын

  🎉 greetings from coastal Mississippi. Impressive y'all. 😂

• 
  @lsdave426 ай бұрын

  jfc that music should be ashamed of itself

• 
  @nicolestutts73467 ай бұрын

  That they did!!! They took our village!!! And it is going to continue to drive this country to nothing!!!

• 
  @nathancarver51307 ай бұрын

  This remix is pretty decent! Who made this?

• 
  @2ADADDY7 ай бұрын

  Come learn with us www.nashvilledancefest.com

• 
  @jcom8347 ай бұрын

  Very COOL!! With those steps, y'all can definitely dance some mexican cumbia. 😁👍

• 
  @andromedagalaxynebula57516 ай бұрын

  Salsa and cumbia

• 
  @TylerPotter-ch9lg28 күн бұрын

  Very cool with those steps yall can definitely dance some Mexican cumbia

• 
  @s0ph_0027 ай бұрын

  the steps that yall are doing, is this considered a half-step?

• 
  @2ADADDY7 ай бұрын

  Two Steppin with some swingggg

• 
  @jeanstout40358 ай бұрын

  True country. Puts a smile on your heart and your feet to dancing. Hugs Cody.❤

• 
  @Sniper_Wcue9 ай бұрын

  Relatable 😂

• 
  @MrGeekPanda9 ай бұрын

  He said we don't know when the individual is fonna flip about it and then said we need to stop that individual, hes contradicting his own statement

• 
  @2ADADDY9 ай бұрын

  The difficulty being expressed is that it is very difficult to determine who is going to be a threat because real life is not Minority Report and people are innocent until proven guilty. By stopping the individual he means by physically meeting them in that moment as fast as possible to neutralize the threat.

• 
  @afrayedknott17019 ай бұрын

  In 1939, the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller denied the claim of a defendant that certain provisions of Federal law regulating the possession of certain firearms was Unconstitutional. The reason the Court denied the claim is crucial to the current debate over Federal and State regulation of firearms, and the meaning of the Second Amendment according to the Supreme Court. [By the way, the Heller decision did not overturn or modify the decision in Miller, which therefore remains binding precedent. The two decisions are completely compatible.] To understand the Court's decision in Miller, one must first comprehend how the Miller Court interpreted the Second Amendment: SCOTUS: "The Constitution, as originally adopted, granted to the Congress power -- To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress. With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces, the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted and applied with that end in view. The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train is set in contrast with Troops which they [p179] were forbidden to keep without the consent of Congress. The sentiment of the time strongly disfavored standing armies; the common view was that adequate defense of country and laws could be secured through the Militia -- civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion. The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. "A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline." And further, that ordinarily, when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time. Blackstone's Commentaries, Vol. 2, Ch. 13, p. 409 points out "that king Alfred first settled a national militia in this kingdom," and traces the subsequent development and use of such forces." ~ United States v. Miller (No. 696) 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. [Decided: May 15, 1939] If that's how the Court interpreted the Second Amendment, then why did it deny the defendant's claim that the Federal laws regulating firearms at the time were Unconstitutional? The reason was clearly not, as has often been falsely claimed, that the Miller Court concluded that the Second Amendment did not grant an individual right to keep and bear arms. Instead, the Court explained its reason this way: "In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense. Aymette v. State, 2 Humphreys (Tenn.) 154, 158." In other words, no evidence had been entered into the official record of the case proving that the weapon possessed by the defendant (a shotgun with a a barrel length of less than 18") was "any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense." The Court interpreted the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right to keep and bear military grade firearms, and as far as it knew based on the evidence presented, a short-barreled shotgun was not "ordinary military equipment," nor was it useful for the common defense of the nation. So the defendant lost the case solely because his firearm wasn't--in the opinion of the Court in the absence of any evidence on the subject in the official record of the case--a military grade weapon useful for "the common defense." Therefore, per current binding Supreme Court precedent, any outright prohibitions of firearms that qualify as "ordinary military equipment" or that would be useful "for the common defense" are Unconstitutional

• 
  @jdz19 ай бұрын

  And that’s why gun regulations are needed, that those certain individuals are not getting a hold of a gun.. it is way harder to control these people and their minds or get each single one of them the therapy they need, than it is to just change gun regulations, that each individual who wants to own a gun gets tested and checked for certain mental problems which potentially make this person unstable. That’s just purely logical and works in nearly every other western country.

• 
  @2ADADDY9 ай бұрын

  You can’t take away good people’s rights who are the majority because of the evil of few.

• 
  @jdz19 ай бұрын

  @@2ADADDYThe rights of the general people aren’t in question right now. People who don’t have any mental incapacity, will continue to have the right to own and acquire guns. Just those people won’t, that either committed some what of a major crime before or simply are proven to be mentally unstable and tend towards being more violent and dangerous than other people. Trying to find each individual who belongs to exactly this group in society and placing him into therapy is just not possible and would waste way too many recourses.

• 
  @2ADADDY9 ай бұрын

  @@jdz1 so you suggest making laws that affect everyone because of the actions of few as the solution?

• 
  @jdz19 ай бұрын

  @@2ADADDY How does a background check effect you as a mentally healthy person, besides the extra time you need to wait for approval??

• 
  @zenscout9 ай бұрын

  Agree, up to the point of the innocents shot

• 
  @henloampepe9 ай бұрын

  Based and 2apilled but still ACAB

• 
  @Zurich_for_Beginners9 ай бұрын

  so we should part the individual from the guns.

• 
  @Beensock9 ай бұрын

  good luck with that

• 
  @2ADADDY9 ай бұрын

  How if there is nothing to warrant taking away an individual’s constitutional rights?

• 
  @Zurich_for_Beginners9 ай бұрын

  @@2ADADDY kzread.info/dash/bejne/rJqFxMyAc83fls4.html

• 
  @MrRickybhere9 ай бұрын

  Idiots with guns !

• 
  @yvonneflores987510 ай бұрын

  Wow this is so beautiful! I love the dancing ! I’ve been waiting for this song to finally come out and this video is on repeat since it’s all I got for now 😢 😂

• 
  @Lucas-en3jw10 ай бұрын

  😢 P r o m o s m

• 
  @studiosylvestre10 ай бұрын

  Really cool dance but i don't know why that not look real for me. Mooved like npc or real npc, what a weird feeling when the reality look fake...

• 
  @randyreuwer872710 ай бұрын

  💯🇺🇲2A

• 
  @hansgordy10 ай бұрын

  Yes they are thinking... and President Biden will be elected again in a fair and democratic election.

• 
  @foreign_baby230610 ай бұрын

  Currently WATCHING THIS IN A COUNTRY CLUB. I SHA LEARN THE WAYSSSSS

• 
  @bobbyb712710 ай бұрын

  slick!!!

• 
  @renepcj4017 Жыл бұрын

  Hey, where is your rhythm at?🙃

• 
  @eighthofmayrainyday Жыл бұрын

  this deserves more likes

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Thank ya! We got more ideas coming soon

• 
  @xDARTHxMOx-Clips Жыл бұрын

  Bro became every boy's daydream in school.

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  It’s odd you willingly comment something like this for everyone to see.

• 
  @xDARTHxMOx-Clips Жыл бұрын

  @@2ADADDY Im a bot 🤖

• 
  @michaelstone7626 Жыл бұрын

  Why you playing with your school supplies when its summer?

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Class is always in session

• 
  @thaikeayrr Жыл бұрын

  🤣🤣🤣🤣💋

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Thank you 🙏🏼 haha

• 
  @Dude_Im-Not_Scared Жыл бұрын

  Underrated

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Felt like we did a decent job on this transition 👏🏼

• 
  @Dude_Im-Not_Scared Жыл бұрын

  @@2ADADDY it was an amazing transition

• 
  @jay5281 Жыл бұрын

  Where u going

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Casual wear

• 
  @my._.name_ Жыл бұрын

  Pff lmao

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  I can tell you LOVED it 😊

• 
  @my._.name_ Жыл бұрын

  @@2ADADDY yeah you looked super cool and not insecure at all

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Exactly, you get it 🙌🏼

• 
  @fyodordostoyevski5816 Жыл бұрын

  Oh yeah, but take away a woman’s rights to control her body. Uh huh. Oh that.

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  Totally different conversations. I appreciate your insight though. Where do you feel life begins?

• 
  @fyodordostoyevski5816 Жыл бұрын

  READ THE 2ND AMENDMENT! Assault weapons weren’t even conceivable then, much less protected.

• 
  @imtallpaul Жыл бұрын

  You sure a hell know what they are. Go look at the heads of children shot with those weapons! Look at them! Mass shootings were down 70% when there was an assault weapon ban. Do you need them to protect your home? Then you should move! Do you need them to protect you from a tyrannical government? They have cruise missiles. Do you hunt with one? Nope. AND PS: The bullets used in assault style weapons didn't exist when the 2nd amendment was written. We can ban the bullets.

• 
  @traceysorensen2753 Жыл бұрын

  Treason!!

• 
  @mikerevendale4810 Жыл бұрын

  Too many machine gun toting 18-year-olds have sacrificed their lives in foreign wars to deny them of the most basic of rights now.

• 
  @Idolhands7007 Жыл бұрын

  Sweet!! We almost have enough guns to be safe. Of course, we won’t be truly safe from gun violence until the children have two guns each, but we’re working on it. I think we should just hand out pistols in schools from now on.

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  We never said children. We said adults.

• 
  @nimrodpaul6875 Жыл бұрын

  @2A DADDY yesterday I saw one of those guns walking down the street threatening folks lol

• 
  @Idolhands7007 Жыл бұрын

  @@2ADADDY well wouldn’t the guns make them safer? I took hunter’s safety at 12. I was shooting guns at age 9. Are you saying children shouldn’t be able to use guns?

• 
  @2ADADDY Жыл бұрын

  @@Idolhands7007 we said children shouldn't own firearms and only be used under adult supervision.

• 
  @Idolhands7007 Жыл бұрын

  @@2ADADDY why?

• 
  @sircolinlesleyrowling Жыл бұрын

  Dumbgun muricans 🤪👈 !