Пікірлер

• 
  @akebouz6 күн бұрын

  Stop kinderen lastig te vallen met gestoorde linkse ideologieën. Van klimaatcrisis tot gender onzin.

• 
  @nicohendriks327823 күн бұрын

  Er is geen eens een werkende thorium reactor in de wereld.

• 
  @veronicagomezdeemiliani448123 күн бұрын

  Great concepts here by Dr Vazquez, but what a dreadful interviewer, probably speechless.

• 
  @BiancaNaima26 күн бұрын

  This was a great intro to decolonisation, showing the importance of positioning yourself!

• 
  @hermanvandervoort4807Ай бұрын

  John d,well done.

• 
  @jochem2348Ай бұрын

  Wat het kernenergie want de thorium reactor is in de jaren 50 ontwikkeld voor vliegen.

• 
  @Stefan-gh7xrАй бұрын

  Er is helemaal geen bewijs dat CO2 bijdraagt tot de opwarming van de aarde. Sterker nog, kijk eens naar historische grafieken en dan zie je dat altijd de temperatuur eerst toeneemt en daarna pas de CO2 concentratie. Plantjes groeien lekker op CO2, daarom verhoogt men de CO2 concentratie in de kastuinbouw. Bekijk ook eens de nieuwe documentaire "Climate Change: The cold truth"

• 
  @noeactuallyАй бұрын

  THANK YOU! Now onto jujutsu Kaisen

• 
  @atsukorichards1675Ай бұрын

  Wow, rule for underwear, really? I think it was not a general rule.

• 
  @haggaigertzАй бұрын

  Min 11:26 it's a quote from the Dao De Ying, ten centuries older than the Buddhism

• 
  @Engineersoldinterstingstuff2 ай бұрын

  What happens if you measure the states of two entangled qubits at the same time..?

• 
  @georgeangles65422 ай бұрын

  It was a good watch. It's funny to me how when he's asked a solid question. He dismisses it in a defensive manner

• 
  @anneloreboxum89062 ай бұрын

  Eerst dacht ik….wat een apart idee, maar…..ik wil toch weten waarom Rutger zo denkt, ik kan dus zijn boek gaan lezen en dan weer kijken hoe ik er na dit boek over denk.

• 
  @user-pf7cn6un5e2 ай бұрын

  Er is met jou iets mis gore deuger

• 
  @user-pf7cn6un5e2 ай бұрын

  Kapot schiete jou

• 
  @user-pf7cn6un5e2 ай бұрын

  Rutger viezerik.

• 
  @rmd20633 ай бұрын

  Kijk eens naar de FvD….

• 
  @quantumwaver3 ай бұрын

  Ah. Trees in the way of the woods. There is nothing new happening. There has only ever been one thing happening. It just changes form on a regular basis.

• 
  @johndagugewoon3 ай бұрын

  The voices of torrents are from one great tongue, the lions of the hills are the pure body of Buddha. 'Isn't that right?' he said to the teacher. 'It is,' said the teacher, 'but it's a pity to say so.'

• 
  @roberth98143 ай бұрын

  The Tesla dip is about to hit 180, amazing to see

• 
  @craow45744 ай бұрын

  amazing

• 
  @rinskekegel4014 ай бұрын

  De tao moet je voelen en ervaren door middel van training. Tegenwoordig kan dat ook in Nederland.

• 
  @tikaanipippin4 ай бұрын

  Brainwashed by hyperbole. There is no crisis, merely a challenge, not to undo past mistakes, but to create solutions to a world that has always had a changing climate, because the people who seem to believe that the planet should be in equilibrium are simply wrong. There is no energy budget. There is no reason that whatever comes in must = the same value that must come out! Technology will not fix the world, just move the problem somewhere else. Too long, didn't watch.

• 
  @WillArtie4 ай бұрын

  oohh! Ive never understood the surface of a BH is what is needed to describe the information contained within. How? The volume of a sphere is so much bigger than its surface. But the way he described it, it has to do with limits which i never knew! Thats the max because any more and you would create a BH. It's sort of like ti determine a particles position to higher and higher accuracy you need to use ever increasing frequency and energy until at the Planck length again you create a BH. Gee I hope this understanding is right because ever since the PBS Space-time episode about this topic ive been confused and frustrated that I didnt get it.

• 
  @HansKeesom4 ай бұрын

  Utopisch denken komt op mij over als een slimme truc om logisch nadenken met onderbouwing en kritische vragen als 1 heeft dit idee ooit gewerkt? 2 Waar heeft dit gewerkt? 3 Heeft dit ooit op grote schaal gewerkt, te omzeilen. Komt over als een noodzakelijk truc om toch weer communisme in te voeren, ondanks de vele bewijzen dat het niet werkt. We hebben een redelijk goed werkend systeem waar wat wijzigingen nodig zijn. Bijvoorbeeld dat werkgevers gemakkelijker bullshitbanen kunnen opheffen. Dan is vervolgens een basisinkomen prima voor allen die toch niet meer productief kunnen worden ingezet. Probleem is echter dat veel bullshitbanen een midden of hoger inkomen hebben en die houden maar al te graag vast aan hun bullshitinkomen.

• 
  @rave17045 ай бұрын

  iedereen gaat dood dus

• 
  @tomjansen15915 ай бұрын

  Buy Bitcoin

• 
  @willemoosterom24385 ай бұрын

  Als contant geld verdwijnt dan krijgen we negatieve rentes en giga bankkosten. Maar dat gelooft natuurlijk niemand. Nou dat zijn dan zielige goed gelovige schaapjes en daar zijn er veel teveel van onder de burgerbevolking..

• 
  @hakancandemir19915 ай бұрын

  verstdehe ich halbl nischt aber DA AHOY ALLEMAHL

• 
  @diekstra8975 ай бұрын

  Het Engelse ‘billion’ moet je niet vertalen naar biljoen, knullemans, maar naar miljard. Het Engelse ‘trillion’ is het equivalent van het Nederlandse biljoen, maar van zulke hoge investeringen is helaas nog geen sprake in de wereld van de kwantumcomputers.

• 
  @tarikyurtgezer17005 ай бұрын

  As a photographer, I often experience the feeling of emptiness while shooting. At that moment, the subject-object duality disappears, I feel one with the entire universe. Thank you for this presentation and shairing.

• 
  @IngeDieleman5 ай бұрын

  Ik geloof ook in optimisme, je hebt gelijk,maar er zijn ook nog altijd warhoofden, oekranie, israel,hamas, en daar staan we o zo machteloos. We kunnen op alle manieren bijdragen tot een altijd betere wereld. Maar hoe breng je de gevaarlijken tot andere inzichten-poetin_hamas,en dergelijke. Spijtig dat de balans en evenwichten weer zwaar verstoord worden.

• 
  @lsdc16 ай бұрын

  Woof!

• 
  @TheVincent02686 ай бұрын

  Rot op met je racistische 'wit'.

• 
  @mmondt94406 ай бұрын

  her philosophy is best described as "White man bad". 10 minutes in I still haven't learned anything about this African philosophy I was hoping to understand.

• 
  @leophysics6 ай бұрын

  How fool the professor doesn't even talk about praman 😂😂

• 
  @ankitbishnoi5 ай бұрын

  What is praman? why that is necessary?

• 
  @PhysicsMath5 ай бұрын

  It is proof part of the religion. Is not only believe

• 
  @harkema80906 ай бұрын

  Is dit stof voor de TU? 😮 Ik vrees dat dit richting complotdenken gaat!

• 
  @TheVincent02687 ай бұрын

  Laat dat Critical Thinking maar weg 😀

• 
  @estelley14247 ай бұрын

  Thank you for the lecture ! Where can we find the booklist?

• 
  @blaiseheath39307 ай бұрын

  Promo-SM

• 
  @hoihoi98667 ай бұрын

  Hoe deze man praatte nadat Israël beelden heeft laten zien van hamas en hoe die moorden, de gedachte van hem is dat Israël dat heeft gedaan om hun te beïnvloeden.hoe ziek kan je zijn als je zo kan denken. A de journalisten waren vrijwillig en B ja wat daar gebeurde moest de wereld zien of had deze man het liever onder het tapijt geschoven. Hamas liefhebber?

• 
  @GuerrasLaws7 ай бұрын

  The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity. ~Guadalupe Guerra

• 
  @mtjoeng7 ай бұрын

  IPPC fraud Tuig van de Richel Ice Core Data: Temperature >> CO2 Not CO2 >> Temperature

• 
  @akebouz7 ай бұрын

  Five stages of climate derangement syndrome would make more sense

• 
  @TheVincent02687 ай бұрын

  Ook een keer een debat in het Nederlands organiseren.

• 
  @erfanpour.60408 ай бұрын

  Er wordt betekenis gegeven aan deze fenomenen zonder context. b.v het gaat om zelfdiscipline en gevecht kunst is een manifest daarvan. Confucius geloofde in respect en bescheidenheid in de sociale orde en in enorme masculiene samenleving van zijn tijd was man de top van het gezin. en zo zijn er heel veel voorbeelden die alleen de oppervlakte van de situatie belichten.

• 
  @Rico-Suave_8 ай бұрын

  Watched all of it 57:16

• 
  @pluribus8 ай бұрын

  The selfish impulse is not intrinsic as Daniel Schmachtenberger pointed out in his GITA talk kzread.info/dash/bejne/oKp1xK1-aJDQiaQ.html "I had a teacher of anthropology that would have been like 110 now when I was young. He was very old and he had the fortune of getting to be the first Western person to contact many indigenous tribes, or one of the first, that were still separate from Western civilization and modern civilization writ large. He was doing cultural analysis on seeing how much the current modern society model had become ubiquitous conditioning (in all of our studies of human nature were inside of ubiquitous conditioning, so you can't really call it nature), and so he wanted to see the things that hadn't been conditioned in that way and if human nature actually expressed differently. So he was looking at the most violent and least violent cultures and looking at what it's a function of, and one of the key things was looking at how it was a function of language. I actually had a couple teachers that had looked at this deeply. One of the most profound insights was they said that in some of the island Polynesian cultures and some of the Amazonian cultures that were still extremely non-violent, both inter and intra-tribe, they didn't have the word mine in their language. First person possessive just wasn't even a word. And in other ones they had the word, but it was extremely de-emphasized. It was like a strange word to refer to a bad idea. And they had "ours", but even "ours" (possession) didn't mean the same thing, it had the concept of stewardship built into the semantic itself. And mine is actually one of the first words that most kids in our culture learn. And one of the things that they found was that the cultures that didn't have the word mine also didn't have the word or the prevalence of the words greed, selfish or jealousy. Because those were not just innate human emotions that are always there, they were actually memetic constructs. If you have a shared ownership situation in a tribe, but it's not ownership because you don't have massive surplus, so you don't have radical wealth inequality, everybody shares stuff, whoever goes fishing, that's for everybody, whoever is picking berries... is you just don't build those same constructs in terms of I want what they have, it just doesn't occur in the same way. So there are so many constructs that we have that we take for granted as just human nature that we have to work with that are actually at the foundation of our problems. So I mentioned that because the word resource is an inherently violent word. The way we think of it. The way we've defined it. Human Resources is: how do we see sentient human beings, who are somebody's baby, who are going to be on their deathbed reflecting upon their purpose in life, and if they use their time, how do we see them as a resource for a company that has a fiduciary responsibility to profit maximize. They're, not f#$king human resources, they're human beings. And talking about natural resources - is a whale a natural resource? Because it is if you're running a whaling boat. A whale's a natural resource. Is it any sentient animal? Is an ecosystem that we devastate a natural resource? Black people used to be natural resources - meaning part of the chattel the same way we treat cows. So the word and concept resource has to go. Like it just fundamentally the idea man's dominion over everything is here for us. If we can control it and extract it, it's about its utility value, rather than intrinsic value for us. At the heart of the ideas that has to go is that. So I want to throw out the concept of resource to begin with. And I want to say that words like mine and resource and like they're colonized colonizer-mind concepts."

• 
  @Gordan1098 ай бұрын

  Yes this is the answer on all questions John💚Real wealth is our ecosystem period.

• 
  @MarieJoseO9 ай бұрын

  Logisch dat hij en zijn vrouw op bepaald moment dezelfde herinnering hebben in de auto; ze rijden samen langs een bepaald object in de omgeving dat bij hen dezelfde gedachte oproept