It's a fine airplane. Many of the DC-10s crashes weren't the airplanes fault, but rather improper maintenance. Ground crew checking their work and improper production of spares by secondary contractors, not MD. There were some flaws. Every airplane has them, but they were fixed. And before you hate on the DC-10/MD-11, I'll bet more than one occasion, an MD-11 has gotten that Amazon order to you.
@user-wb1hy3dg1k2 ай бұрын
MD-11
@medic_gamnig_savetf24 ай бұрын
Man I wish had returned to the mcdonelle douglas company gero
@bosnianaviation55315 ай бұрын
My cousin Amna is in love with MD-11
@coconutdreams12384 ай бұрын
Tell Anna she's not alone
@bosnianaviation55314 ай бұрын
@@coconutdreams1238 Meanwhile, I fell in love too. I flew St Marteen to Boston - Continental old livery. Tomorrow I will take Dublin to Boston with add-on airports.
@jay-rus44378 ай бұрын
Looking forward to flying the soon to be released Microsoft flight simulator version. Love these airliners.
@user-rj6td5ht4i10 ай бұрын
Mcdonald douglas md 11???
@oldriver1478 Жыл бұрын
A great bird. I had the good luck to fly it for 12 years in my 40 year pilot career.
@bobl78 Жыл бұрын
it also featured a super flamable insulation.. Swiss 111 .. it was a shitbox airplane
@coconutdreams12384 ай бұрын
Which was not the aircrafts fault but mainly Swissairs cost cutting choice (and also the misleading information that the insulation was fireproof)
@Extratone Жыл бұрын
dat after-body drag 😮😮😮
@noway9880 Жыл бұрын
I assume this video was intended for airlines/pilots?
@RobbertsTravelGuides Жыл бұрын
Such an underrated airplane. Sadly it had an insulation wich was lightly flameable. wich brought down the MD11 from Swissair One of my favorite planes though
@twiff3rino2811 ай бұрын
Bad wiring too.
@Josh.Davidson27 күн бұрын
The wiring insulation was not at fault of McDD. This was an aftermarket entertainment system put in by SWISSAIR.
@smesui1799 Жыл бұрын
Compared to the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, the DC-10/MD-11 is a stove-pipe with wings.
@sergiohenriquevinhas. Жыл бұрын
MD11 junto com os 07, 27,47, 67, 77, são aeronaves fantásticas. Maravilhas da engenharia aeronáutica!
@vladilenkalatschev4915 Жыл бұрын
Boeing killed this aircraft
@FLT1112 жыл бұрын
The MD-11 could've been just as successful as the Boeing 747-400 was however McDoodle Air failed to design a wing applicable to a stretched DC-10 which is really what the aircraft was. They just added a modern cockpit and winglets really. The 747-400 was better executed as a new gen 747 than the DC-10.
@coconutdreams1238 Жыл бұрын
There were plans to cooperate with Airbus and built the AM-300, basically an MD-11 fuselage with a330/a340 wings. Unfortunately, those wings were to big for the McDonnellDouglas's factory.
@antoniodavirbrito2 жыл бұрын
The mistake of MD-11 was the engine on tail. Being a two engine aircraft would not prevent to reach the range goals.
@fixedon2 жыл бұрын
pretty sure the reason for that is so it could travel transatlantic since i believe at the time when it was made, you needed 3 or more engines to cross the atlantic
@Maxime-pk6cu2 жыл бұрын
@@fixedon yup ETOPS regulations for transatlantic flight
@toddwieland7664 Жыл бұрын
That was a safety move
@FLT111 Жыл бұрын
Nothing to do with the third engine.. Look at the 747-400.. And it was pretty successful. The problem was an inefficient wing and and inefficient engines.
@anjinsanx442 жыл бұрын
rotate for xplane tfdi for msfs or P3D soon !
@simonwelser6973 Жыл бұрын
Have only found the Cargo variant of the Rotate MD11 so far, is there a PAX version too?
@Mr.President3 жыл бұрын
5:15 oh boy :( ....... that aged badly
@rosaliedollente56302 жыл бұрын
The insulation installed was incorrect
@daktarioskarvannederhosen25683 жыл бұрын
dc-10 / md-11 = hazardous junk
@rosaliedollente56302 жыл бұрын
br
@rosaliedollente56302 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@lekoman3 жыл бұрын
Man, that chipper 80s music at the beginning just does not fit.
@ryankenyon50103 жыл бұрын
Love the video!
@gunston9993 жыл бұрын
These people are actually proud of the DC 10..A plane responsible for thousands of deaths.
@Spaceworld-9510 ай бұрын
DC 10 was later fixed and it's safety was improved.
@wisnuadiputra48434 жыл бұрын
3:05 MD 11 Garuda Indonesia 😍😍😍
@ricardotate33924 жыл бұрын
Automatic stability augmentation system sounds like mcas to me.
@rosaliedollente56302 жыл бұрын
Dont worry they are different
@jumpnrun33682 жыл бұрын
More like a 777
@Thoar0032 жыл бұрын
funny
@FLT1114 жыл бұрын
Nice looking place but a fucking lemon and a half because MDC was too tight to invest in future development of aircraft. MDC was a shit company and once they merged with Boeing it's been like a cancer..
@WSPROJECT082 жыл бұрын
Bapakmu heang
@tenforetenfore4 жыл бұрын
Too fast V-ref at final and long enough sorta crash easily after landing however they were The American Beauty.
@userDFboeing3 жыл бұрын
Wtf?
@daktarioskarvannederhosen25683 жыл бұрын
????
@MikeAbignale4 жыл бұрын
classic video! Love the channel guys! This is great!
@paupau79045 жыл бұрын
Excellent airplane 🛬 🛬 🛬 🛬 now just for cargo ✈️✈️😎🙏🙏
@trains_thru_the_lens6 жыл бұрын
0:17 that reminds me of Swissair 111
@originalpadoru4 жыл бұрын
Trainspotting Finland same here but it has a different livery so not too much
@daktarioskarvannederhosen25683 жыл бұрын
@@originalpadoru no it doesn't. that image is of an actual swissair md-11. flight 111 was painted up just like that image.
@originalpadoru3 жыл бұрын
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 no? swissair 111 had the new fully bottom half grey livery, whilst this is the old brown strip livery
@daktarioskarvannederhosen25683 жыл бұрын
@@originalpadoru yea you're right, 111 is grey along bottom. good eye ! however, and as an aside, isn't the swissair md-11 at 17secs in the video painted white all along the bottom?
@originalpadoru3 жыл бұрын
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 I meant there’s a brown strip along the middle of the plane
@DowntownCanon6 жыл бұрын
That smaller and lighter horizontal stabilizer made this plane a bitch to land.
@johnschmidt8440 Жыл бұрын
Not even slightly true. It was very easy to land.
@timjacobi46737 жыл бұрын
I love this dc 11 plane my favoret
@originalpadoru4 жыл бұрын
Tim Jacobi “dc plane”
@originalpadoru4 жыл бұрын
It’s the same aircraft with lots of different small details, such as a bigger fuselage and the rear engine is higher on the wing (also the vertical stabiliser is smaller)
@pcressma2 жыл бұрын
@@originalpadoru It's hardly a "DC-11". The MD-11 has multiple differences over the DC-10. So much so that it flies under its own type certificate. So, no....it's not a DC-11.
@julosx7 жыл бұрын
0:17 Swissair MD-11…mmmkay…
@riot21366 жыл бұрын
julosx I don’t get it
@sexyguy36476 жыл бұрын
I think he`s referring to Swiss Air 111 where an MD-11 crashed
@originalpadoru4 жыл бұрын
It’s okay, plus it’s a different livery, don’t be too sad.
@robertdemeo60817 жыл бұрын
what is the beginning music?
@tem_porary5 жыл бұрын
Headstart - Main Theme kzread.info/dash/bejne/qKOpl8VmZrnfp9o.html :D
@Tnenamrep27 жыл бұрын
Anyone else want to hurt the commentator? :P
@necu93655 жыл бұрын
Gavin Taverner nope
@erikgag5 жыл бұрын
Why
@KALFRID5 жыл бұрын
@Christopher Crepon 😂👍
@r3al_master3862 жыл бұрын
No???
@coconutdreams1238 Жыл бұрын
No...?
@willamesdelas77477 жыл бұрын
e uma grande pena por não darem continuidade a essas Aeronaves! Hoje só de Carga são usados por muitas companhias Aéreas Parabéns.
@alperensahin74079 жыл бұрын
Mc donnel douglas is worst company
@FarhanSyafiqFadhillah9 жыл бұрын
Really?
@alperensahin74079 жыл бұрын
Really,some companies don't care about safety rules (in fact they can look danger in cargo door and etc. in test) and their planes crash. Finally, they have to failed
@alperensahin74079 жыл бұрын
Each people's life travel with planes is so important
@alperensahin74079 жыл бұрын
Sorry for awful English :)
@FarhanSyafiqFadhillah9 жыл бұрын
Better MD-11 is reborn, but with HIGH safety from Boeing. . . . . Oh, you're right, Mcdonnell Douglas didn't aware for the safety.
@mrcannotfindaname9 жыл бұрын
Such a shame that MD11 is quitting the aviation stage. It could have been in service if they put more fuel efficient and cleaner engines on it.
@NJUNDERGROUND9 жыл бұрын
I'm doing a C check on one now...it's configured for cargo but it's still an MD-11
@bobalobalie8 жыл бұрын
I know this is old but, why would they do anything wi0th the MD-11? The company doesn't even exist anymore and hasn't for quite a while. Boeing bought them out, as a favor, when they were in bankruptcy.
@FGCounter18 жыл бұрын
+BewareTheIdes I believe Boeing bought them out to be able to continue selling their highly successful military jets such as the C-17 and the F/A-18 hornet so as to make money instead of letting their military rival, Lockheed gain any advantage.
@that_llama_in_a_tuxedo45847 жыл бұрын
The MD-11 will be a freighter forever.
@Matson7576 жыл бұрын
As I have understood, the biggest problems of MD-11 were it's old fashion wing desing (from DC-10) and three engine layout. McDonnell Douglas calculated at the late 1980's that it would be pointless to design a whole new wing because Jet-A1 were so cheap.
Пікірлер
It's a fine airplane. Many of the DC-10s crashes weren't the airplanes fault, but rather improper maintenance. Ground crew checking their work and improper production of spares by secondary contractors, not MD. There were some flaws. Every airplane has them, but they were fixed. And before you hate on the DC-10/MD-11, I'll bet more than one occasion, an MD-11 has gotten that Amazon order to you.
MD-11
Man I wish had returned to the mcdonelle douglas company gero
My cousin Amna is in love with MD-11
Tell Anna she's not alone
@@coconutdreams1238 Meanwhile, I fell in love too. I flew St Marteen to Boston - Continental old livery. Tomorrow I will take Dublin to Boston with add-on airports.
Looking forward to flying the soon to be released Microsoft flight simulator version. Love these airliners.
Mcdonald douglas md 11???
A great bird. I had the good luck to fly it for 12 years in my 40 year pilot career.
it also featured a super flamable insulation.. Swiss 111 .. it was a shitbox airplane
Which was not the aircrafts fault but mainly Swissairs cost cutting choice (and also the misleading information that the insulation was fireproof)
dat after-body drag 😮😮😮
I assume this video was intended for airlines/pilots?
Such an underrated airplane. Sadly it had an insulation wich was lightly flameable. wich brought down the MD11 from Swissair One of my favorite planes though
Bad wiring too.
The wiring insulation was not at fault of McDD. This was an aftermarket entertainment system put in by SWISSAIR.
Compared to the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, the DC-10/MD-11 is a stove-pipe with wings.
MD11 junto com os 07, 27,47, 67, 77, são aeronaves fantásticas. Maravilhas da engenharia aeronáutica!
Boeing killed this aircraft
The MD-11 could've been just as successful as the Boeing 747-400 was however McDoodle Air failed to design a wing applicable to a stretched DC-10 which is really what the aircraft was. They just added a modern cockpit and winglets really. The 747-400 was better executed as a new gen 747 than the DC-10.
There were plans to cooperate with Airbus and built the AM-300, basically an MD-11 fuselage with a330/a340 wings. Unfortunately, those wings were to big for the McDonnellDouglas's factory.
The mistake of MD-11 was the engine on tail. Being a two engine aircraft would not prevent to reach the range goals.
pretty sure the reason for that is so it could travel transatlantic since i believe at the time when it was made, you needed 3 or more engines to cross the atlantic
@@fixedon yup ETOPS regulations for transatlantic flight
That was a safety move
Nothing to do with the third engine.. Look at the 747-400.. And it was pretty successful. The problem was an inefficient wing and and inefficient engines.
rotate for xplane tfdi for msfs or P3D soon !
Have only found the Cargo variant of the Rotate MD11 so far, is there a PAX version too?
5:15 oh boy :( ....... that aged badly
The insulation installed was incorrect
dc-10 / md-11 = hazardous junk
br
Bruh
Man, that chipper 80s music at the beginning just does not fit.
Love the video!
These people are actually proud of the DC 10..A plane responsible for thousands of deaths.
DC 10 was later fixed and it's safety was improved.
3:05 MD 11 Garuda Indonesia 😍😍😍
Automatic stability augmentation system sounds like mcas to me.
Dont worry they are different
More like a 777
funny
Nice looking place but a fucking lemon and a half because MDC was too tight to invest in future development of aircraft. MDC was a shit company and once they merged with Boeing it's been like a cancer..
Bapakmu heang
Too fast V-ref at final and long enough sorta crash easily after landing however they were The American Beauty.
Wtf?
????
classic video! Love the channel guys! This is great!
Excellent airplane 🛬 🛬 🛬 🛬 now just for cargo ✈️✈️😎🙏🙏
0:17 that reminds me of Swissair 111
Trainspotting Finland same here but it has a different livery so not too much
@@originalpadoru no it doesn't. that image is of an actual swissair md-11. flight 111 was painted up just like that image.
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 no? swissair 111 had the new fully bottom half grey livery, whilst this is the old brown strip livery
@@originalpadoru yea you're right, 111 is grey along bottom. good eye ! however, and as an aside, isn't the swissair md-11 at 17secs in the video painted white all along the bottom?
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 I meant there’s a brown strip along the middle of the plane
That smaller and lighter horizontal stabilizer made this plane a bitch to land.
Not even slightly true. It was very easy to land.
I love this dc 11 plane my favoret
Tim Jacobi “dc plane”
It’s the same aircraft with lots of different small details, such as a bigger fuselage and the rear engine is higher on the wing (also the vertical stabiliser is smaller)
@@originalpadoru It's hardly a "DC-11". The MD-11 has multiple differences over the DC-10. So much so that it flies under its own type certificate. So, no....it's not a DC-11.
0:17 Swissair MD-11…mmmkay…
julosx I don’t get it
I think he`s referring to Swiss Air 111 where an MD-11 crashed
It’s okay, plus it’s a different livery, don’t be too sad.
what is the beginning music?
Headstart - Main Theme kzread.info/dash/bejne/qKOpl8VmZrnfp9o.html :D
Anyone else want to hurt the commentator? :P
Gavin Taverner nope
Why
@Christopher Crepon 😂👍
No???
No...?
e uma grande pena por não darem continuidade a essas Aeronaves! Hoje só de Carga são usados por muitas companhias Aéreas Parabéns.
Mc donnel douglas is worst company
Really?
Really,some companies don't care about safety rules (in fact they can look danger in cargo door and etc. in test) and their planes crash. Finally, they have to failed
Each people's life travel with planes is so important
Sorry for awful English :)
Better MD-11 is reborn, but with HIGH safety from Boeing. . . . . Oh, you're right, Mcdonnell Douglas didn't aware for the safety.
Such a shame that MD11 is quitting the aviation stage. It could have been in service if they put more fuel efficient and cleaner engines on it.
I'm doing a C check on one now...it's configured for cargo but it's still an MD-11
I know this is old but, why would they do anything wi0th the MD-11? The company doesn't even exist anymore and hasn't for quite a while. Boeing bought them out, as a favor, when they were in bankruptcy.
+BewareTheIdes I believe Boeing bought them out to be able to continue selling their highly successful military jets such as the C-17 and the F/A-18 hornet so as to make money instead of letting their military rival, Lockheed gain any advantage.
The MD-11 will be a freighter forever.
As I have understood, the biggest problems of MD-11 were it's old fashion wing desing (from DC-10) and three engine layout. McDonnell Douglas calculated at the late 1980's that it would be pointless to design a whole new wing because Jet-A1 were so cheap.