Easy to listen to, but funky. I like it. Adding it to my playlist
@mikebuquicc31248 күн бұрын
nice work Jay!! keep it up
@DharmYogi29 күн бұрын
Excellent points made about taking the full view. Imagine how the world would be if we thought about the impact on environment with our actions. This guy is educating him on the deeper philosophy of Vedic culture and philosophy
@Groovethrough2 ай бұрын
As a western man, I have to say thi s "other" guy, who I dindn't even know the name, is so write.
@protonman89472 ай бұрын
Stupid header. I guess you didn't pay attention to "the context". They are talking past each other. Words have distinct meanings - that is the point Dawkins was making and he is correct. That does not contradict the understanding that "a tree" is part of an ecosystem that includes sun, soil and atmosphere.
@moespaghetticonfetti50412 ай бұрын
No one was schooled they were having decent conversation with each other.
@carlschjelderup55322 ай бұрын
He has a point
@billkotas90492 ай бұрын
Pretty good "sh_t" this has to say to response to Dawkins...
@nitishgautam57282 ай бұрын
Both were good but title is not... Less intelligent people tend to conclude before even listening
@books47392 ай бұрын
yawn. 🥱 He said nothing original, all truisms that small children understand. That is why asia never progressed until western intervention.
@sophiarevel69522 ай бұрын
Network, that's what we learnt in basic biology. The web of life. Dawkins is so wrong.
@GET0V3RHERE3 ай бұрын
Wow.
@adayah29333 ай бұрын
I think Satish Kumar has a sort of unpolished scientific mind - he has the skills to analyze the reality, but he lacks the ability to think and communicate clearly. It is as though Dawkins and Kumar were to paint a picture of their thought. Dawkins is like a laser printer: he lays out everything in complete detail from bottom to top, resulting in a clear picture. Kumar, however, is like an oldschool painter: smudge here, splatter there, finally some dabbing - and you get an artistic picture which you can kind of relate to, but it has several shortcomings and feels nothing like "bullseye". This conversation also makes me reflect on something. Many Europeans praise the eastern masters for their wisdom, yet they fail to appreciate how gigantic of an achievement was made within their very own culture... S c i e n c e. The depth of thought that Dawkins presents in this video, the laserlike accuracy and crystal clear communication are a hallmark of the scientific enterprise which the West should be extremely proud of.
@AM_o20003 ай бұрын
I see the opposite of Kumar schooling Dawkins, i.e. Dawkins politely encouraging Kumar to hone his very simplistic and frankly obvious idea.
@imax3d5393 ай бұрын
Love the vid. Just two people having an intelligent conversation and trying to understand each other's perspectives on a topic. But i think the title is a bit misleading.
@tiromandal63994 ай бұрын
Satish Kumar schools Richard Dawkins just as a flashlight without batteries schools a quasar on how to be bright.
@grandmastershek4 ай бұрын
You don't school people by playing word games
@billybobobenner4 ай бұрын
A Ridiculous title for the video. "2 men having a reasonable chat" would be fairer, though that wouldn't be quite so clickbaity eh @Jay Hunt Music
@mganla4 ай бұрын
Another click bait heading. Nonsense, no one schooled anyone
@Walker-ld3dn4 ай бұрын
Lovely conversation by two intelligent gentlemen. This not a "competition" and nobody lost and nobody won. This is not Michigan vs.Ohio State. Enjoy the dialogue. Period.
@anandsharma74304 ай бұрын
Satish Kumar is wrong because you can grow trees in hydroponics and aquaponics environments. The environment changes, but the functional unit remains the same. There is a unique DNA signature for a given tree, whatever the soil, sunlight, humidity. True, the tree does not grow and live without an environment, but that is different from saying the tree itself does not exist as a unit. Structural and functional analyses both are needed. His point about society being a mess due to not seeing the whole ecosystem of interactions is very true and very pertinent, especially in the context of climate change. But he is refusing to see Dawkins' point - that study of the structural is necessary for knowlegde. Dawkins is, in turn, not seeing the point of Satish Kumar that in our narrow structural focus, we have messed up the planet and society by "externalising costs" and not seeing the whole picture. In effect, while both are talking about trees, they are repeating their correct (both) beliefs about different phenomena - Dawkins about learning / knowledge, and Satish Kumar about the foolishness of ignoring the environment as a species. IMO. It's a bit funny that they cannot remove themselves from their points of view and see that they are talking about different things, being in the heat of debate or something like that.
@bike4aday4 ай бұрын
Kumar looks at the tree's dependent origination whereas Dawkins looks at the tree's composition. It seems Dawkins doesn't understand the difference between these when he says it's just semantics.
@counterculture104 ай бұрын
“The greatest illusion in this world is the illusion of separation.” - Albert Einstein
@rudolfpianos4 ай бұрын
Haha! More than schooling- educating..
@anirprasadd4 ай бұрын
Nobody got schooled here. It's Two rational men discussing. Some religious folk will just jump at any opportunity to dump on Richard Dawkins.
@EndOfFed5 ай бұрын
Who is Satish Kumar? He sounds great and I like the way he puts things.
@guenelguerrier27535 ай бұрын
He definitely schooled Dawkins. He sat there deflecting and contributed nothing to the dialogue. His own body language showed he felt pinned down by his inability to make a valid point.
@wrdfgrred112_wq5 ай бұрын
Terrible title for the video
@Astrophile23455 ай бұрын
Tons of brainless people in the comment section 💀
@oya2706 ай бұрын
Context is everything. Most Western intellectuals actually think in a shallow reductionist way and believe that they've arrived at some absolute Truth. Sri Aurobindo spoke on this in a very in-depth way.
@zahraexshiatruthseeker16 ай бұрын
Awesome Sir Satish Kumar!
@mindyourownbusinessfatty6 ай бұрын
Satish Kumar is just trying the "oh God made it all." Its a long winded way of saying, "everything is interconnected." Whereas Dawkins is saying, "we know that, you are toi simplistic, now im interested in how the tree works. If anything
@InvinciblePepe2 ай бұрын
Not really.
@kundanchhabra6 ай бұрын
Also: you can't compare a tree (Nature-made) to a damned compiuter (man-made) because it's apples and oranges! Bahahaa!!!!
@kundanchhabra6 ай бұрын
LOL Dawkins is clearly ignorant of fractals and chaos science if he is still thinking in terms of his reflexive colonial hierichical thinking! Still stuck in Newtonian times! Bahahaha! It's NOT a hierarchy! It's a holism, dude! His arrogance despite his ignorance is just SAD!
@D9gbka7 ай бұрын
This is exactly how my interactions at the local curry house look each time I'm waiting for my takeaway lamb tikka balti
@knightspygaming12877 ай бұрын
Change the title, its just a conversation
@Dragon123Slayer4 ай бұрын
But you don't get the point. That way it won't get as many views.
@knightspygaming12874 ай бұрын
@@Dragon123Slayer basically a clickbait 😕
@Dragon123Slayer4 ай бұрын
@@knightspygaming1287 Yup.
@unscriptedrides7 ай бұрын
Very good Debate. Not a schooling. This is classic example of fundamental difference between Western and Eastern way of thinking
@cristiano27417 ай бұрын
Its a conversation not schooling
@MegaKiller19607 ай бұрын
Why is everything a schooling or a versus. Can’t there just be a conversation?
@INSHALLAH_SUBAH8 ай бұрын
Love both of them ❤
@Ayush-pn8jk8 ай бұрын
Schools? Both are right in their particular context. One is thinking at micro level and other at macro level. Seems like a respectful healthy conversation
@Tracequaza9 ай бұрын
zeus is gaming tonight lads
@JayHuntMusicDPNY9 ай бұрын
I’m godly like Zeus but haven’t played a video game in 25 years..
@lakshmisharma61829 ай бұрын
Very rightly said sir , the new neuroscience proving that.That every action our brain is context dependent,no rationality , no irrationality no one way of thinking
@harman19579 ай бұрын
Satish kumar just humiliated himself. Unlike in hindu pretentious intellectual circles, bare assertions in the name of "philosophy" are frowned upon. He just kept on spewing unfounded mumbo jumbo which sounds good but has no substance and quite honestly nothing new.
@AnonymousAlien20997 ай бұрын
You can barely understand an entire philosophy based on what he spoke. Try reading books about it instead of being ignorant and name calling something that you cannot comprehend.
@Hitesh.4 ай бұрын
@@AnonymousAlien2099 What are you going on about, bro? Harman never claimed to understand an entire philosophy and neither did he condescendingly 'NAME-CALL' anything that you are asserting that he did. He commented on & hinted at his own anecdotal experiences and on what he saw in THIS KZread video.
@danesboricua9 ай бұрын
Schools? You mean babble?
@dr.abhinavsoppin9 ай бұрын
I'll answer it in simple way. Scientists who know how exactly the tree works are more holistic than you guys who say tree is made of soil,air,water etc😂
@tomashultgren41179 ай бұрын
Dawkins does not want to see the whole picture, it is too complicated. He wants simplistic answers, preferably based on mathematics and digital language. He isn't interested in biology as such, only his fantasy that "life" can be "explained" by the mechanics of "the selfish blind watchmaker". So, we are to believe that the magnificent incredible living planet that we live on is the product of a "selfish" molecule that spontaneous appeared from nothing and created every living creature, including ourselves and our consciousness. He wants us to believe that this is scientifically true. It is not science - it is a monumental leap of faith.
@humanitech10 ай бұрын
Sure everything is connected.... but only in the broadest sense that everything exidts together and is evolved from oositive and negative interactions........however study further and see it's all clearly dipolar, conflicting and unstable ...i.e.always both positive and negative, creative and distructive and recycling. ...and so the connection of all things are neither harmonious or polarised but a mix... which is why many humans struggle to grasp dipolar life and reality for what it really Is....just a temporary opportunity to experience being positive and negative beings and formations in w positive negative cosmos
@driewiel10 ай бұрын
Not sure what this guy is getting at? Things are related? Holy crap how genius. Who would have guessed?
@tomashultgren41179 ай бұрын
Who would have guessed? Well, not Dawkins. He is disturbed by a holistic view. He wants simplistic solutions, preferably based on digital computer language. A blind molecule that appeared from nothing and runs the whole show.
@driewiel9 ай бұрын
@@tomashultgren4117 And your solution is an invisible magician who came out of nowhere and created the universe out of nothing? Well I think that's a bit simplistic. I wonder if you would accept that solution if you have bring your car to the garage? 'Sir we had a look, but we believe there is a ghost under the hood. If you just pray the car will work again'. We are not in the Bronze Age anymore. We don't know everything, but we know a hell of a lot more. Turns out the Earth is not flat resting on four pillars and has a dome on top.
Пікірлер
💚💚💚. Firme BRo. Apreciate. Baby bandit 🍼 music 🎵🎶 Revolution ⭐✨⭐✨⭐✨⭐✨⭐✨⭐✨⭐✨
Easy to listen to, but funky. I like it. Adding it to my playlist
nice work Jay!! keep it up
Excellent points made about taking the full view. Imagine how the world would be if we thought about the impact on environment with our actions. This guy is educating him on the deeper philosophy of Vedic culture and philosophy
As a western man, I have to say thi s "other" guy, who I dindn't even know the name, is so write.
Stupid header. I guess you didn't pay attention to "the context". They are talking past each other. Words have distinct meanings - that is the point Dawkins was making and he is correct. That does not contradict the understanding that "a tree" is part of an ecosystem that includes sun, soil and atmosphere.
No one was schooled they were having decent conversation with each other.
He has a point
Pretty good "sh_t" this has to say to response to Dawkins...
Both were good but title is not... Less intelligent people tend to conclude before even listening
yawn. 🥱 He said nothing original, all truisms that small children understand. That is why asia never progressed until western intervention.
Network, that's what we learnt in basic biology. The web of life. Dawkins is so wrong.
Wow.
I think Satish Kumar has a sort of unpolished scientific mind - he has the skills to analyze the reality, but he lacks the ability to think and communicate clearly. It is as though Dawkins and Kumar were to paint a picture of their thought. Dawkins is like a laser printer: he lays out everything in complete detail from bottom to top, resulting in a clear picture. Kumar, however, is like an oldschool painter: smudge here, splatter there, finally some dabbing - and you get an artistic picture which you can kind of relate to, but it has several shortcomings and feels nothing like "bullseye". This conversation also makes me reflect on something. Many Europeans praise the eastern masters for their wisdom, yet they fail to appreciate how gigantic of an achievement was made within their very own culture... S c i e n c e. The depth of thought that Dawkins presents in this video, the laserlike accuracy and crystal clear communication are a hallmark of the scientific enterprise which the West should be extremely proud of.
I see the opposite of Kumar schooling Dawkins, i.e. Dawkins politely encouraging Kumar to hone his very simplistic and frankly obvious idea.
Love the vid. Just two people having an intelligent conversation and trying to understand each other's perspectives on a topic. But i think the title is a bit misleading.
Satish Kumar schools Richard Dawkins just as a flashlight without batteries schools a quasar on how to be bright.
You don't school people by playing word games
A Ridiculous title for the video. "2 men having a reasonable chat" would be fairer, though that wouldn't be quite so clickbaity eh @Jay Hunt Music
Another click bait heading. Nonsense, no one schooled anyone
Lovely conversation by two intelligent gentlemen. This not a "competition" and nobody lost and nobody won. This is not Michigan vs.Ohio State. Enjoy the dialogue. Period.
Satish Kumar is wrong because you can grow trees in hydroponics and aquaponics environments. The environment changes, but the functional unit remains the same. There is a unique DNA signature for a given tree, whatever the soil, sunlight, humidity. True, the tree does not grow and live without an environment, but that is different from saying the tree itself does not exist as a unit. Structural and functional analyses both are needed. His point about society being a mess due to not seeing the whole ecosystem of interactions is very true and very pertinent, especially in the context of climate change. But he is refusing to see Dawkins' point - that study of the structural is necessary for knowlegde. Dawkins is, in turn, not seeing the point of Satish Kumar that in our narrow structural focus, we have messed up the planet and society by "externalising costs" and not seeing the whole picture. In effect, while both are talking about trees, they are repeating their correct (both) beliefs about different phenomena - Dawkins about learning / knowledge, and Satish Kumar about the foolishness of ignoring the environment as a species. IMO. It's a bit funny that they cannot remove themselves from their points of view and see that they are talking about different things, being in the heat of debate or something like that.
Kumar looks at the tree's dependent origination whereas Dawkins looks at the tree's composition. It seems Dawkins doesn't understand the difference between these when he says it's just semantics.
“The greatest illusion in this world is the illusion of separation.” - Albert Einstein
Haha! More than schooling- educating..
Nobody got schooled here. It's Two rational men discussing. Some religious folk will just jump at any opportunity to dump on Richard Dawkins.
Who is Satish Kumar? He sounds great and I like the way he puts things.
He definitely schooled Dawkins. He sat there deflecting and contributed nothing to the dialogue. His own body language showed he felt pinned down by his inability to make a valid point.
Terrible title for the video
Tons of brainless people in the comment section 💀
Context is everything. Most Western intellectuals actually think in a shallow reductionist way and believe that they've arrived at some absolute Truth. Sri Aurobindo spoke on this in a very in-depth way.
Awesome Sir Satish Kumar!
Satish Kumar is just trying the "oh God made it all." Its a long winded way of saying, "everything is interconnected." Whereas Dawkins is saying, "we know that, you are toi simplistic, now im interested in how the tree works. If anything
Not really.
Also: you can't compare a tree (Nature-made) to a damned compiuter (man-made) because it's apples and oranges! Bahahaa!!!!
LOL Dawkins is clearly ignorant of fractals and chaos science if he is still thinking in terms of his reflexive colonial hierichical thinking! Still stuck in Newtonian times! Bahahaha! It's NOT a hierarchy! It's a holism, dude! His arrogance despite his ignorance is just SAD!
This is exactly how my interactions at the local curry house look each time I'm waiting for my takeaway lamb tikka balti
Change the title, its just a conversation
But you don't get the point. That way it won't get as many views.
@@Dragon123Slayer basically a clickbait 😕
@@knightspygaming1287 Yup.
Very good Debate. Not a schooling. This is classic example of fundamental difference between Western and Eastern way of thinking
Its a conversation not schooling
Why is everything a schooling or a versus. Can’t there just be a conversation?
Love both of them ❤
Schools? Both are right in their particular context. One is thinking at micro level and other at macro level. Seems like a respectful healthy conversation
zeus is gaming tonight lads
I’m godly like Zeus but haven’t played a video game in 25 years..
Very rightly said sir , the new neuroscience proving that.That every action our brain is context dependent,no rationality , no irrationality no one way of thinking
Satish kumar just humiliated himself. Unlike in hindu pretentious intellectual circles, bare assertions in the name of "philosophy" are frowned upon. He just kept on spewing unfounded mumbo jumbo which sounds good but has no substance and quite honestly nothing new.
You can barely understand an entire philosophy based on what he spoke. Try reading books about it instead of being ignorant and name calling something that you cannot comprehend.
@@AnonymousAlien2099 What are you going on about, bro? Harman never claimed to understand an entire philosophy and neither did he condescendingly 'NAME-CALL' anything that you are asserting that he did. He commented on & hinted at his own anecdotal experiences and on what he saw in THIS KZread video.
Schools? You mean babble?
I'll answer it in simple way. Scientists who know how exactly the tree works are more holistic than you guys who say tree is made of soil,air,water etc😂
Dawkins does not want to see the whole picture, it is too complicated. He wants simplistic answers, preferably based on mathematics and digital language. He isn't interested in biology as such, only his fantasy that "life" can be "explained" by the mechanics of "the selfish blind watchmaker". So, we are to believe that the magnificent incredible living planet that we live on is the product of a "selfish" molecule that spontaneous appeared from nothing and created every living creature, including ourselves and our consciousness. He wants us to believe that this is scientifically true. It is not science - it is a monumental leap of faith.
Sure everything is connected.... but only in the broadest sense that everything exidts together and is evolved from oositive and negative interactions........however study further and see it's all clearly dipolar, conflicting and unstable ...i.e.always both positive and negative, creative and distructive and recycling. ...and so the connection of all things are neither harmonious or polarised but a mix... which is why many humans struggle to grasp dipolar life and reality for what it really Is....just a temporary opportunity to experience being positive and negative beings and formations in w positive negative cosmos
Not sure what this guy is getting at? Things are related? Holy crap how genius. Who would have guessed?
Who would have guessed? Well, not Dawkins. He is disturbed by a holistic view. He wants simplistic solutions, preferably based on digital computer language. A blind molecule that appeared from nothing and runs the whole show.
@@tomashultgren4117 And your solution is an invisible magician who came out of nowhere and created the universe out of nothing? Well I think that's a bit simplistic. I wonder if you would accept that solution if you have bring your car to the garage? 'Sir we had a look, but we believe there is a ghost under the hood. If you just pray the car will work again'. We are not in the Bronze Age anymore. We don't know everything, but we know a hell of a lot more. Turns out the Earth is not flat resting on four pillars and has a dome on top.