Пікірлер

• 
  @avismore3938Күн бұрын

  Only problem is that the TR is after the kjv. The TR is a Greek edition of the NT deriving from an English translation (kjv) which comes for about 6 Greek manuscript and also relied on Latin. It’s backwards i know.

• 
  @CornerTalkerКүн бұрын

  Erasmus created the Textus Receptus in 1516 from eight Greek miniscule manuscripts, although in a few verses, he followed the 4th Century Latin Vulgate translation by Jerome. The King James Bible was first printed in 1604, eighty-eight years later. Erasmus, the translator of the TR, died in 1536.

• 
  @squrpion2 күн бұрын

  Thank you for this. So helpful.

• 
  @donovanreed32365 күн бұрын

  So what manuscripts did the Latin Vulgate use?

• 
  @donovanreed32365 күн бұрын

  How does Matthew 19 9 read before Eramus copied them?

• 
  @randyd98059 күн бұрын

  If a true believer in Jesus Christ cannot figure out if such passages as the woman taken in adultery or the last verses of the Gospel of Mark belong in their Bible, I would question if that person has ever really been born again and has the Spirit of God in them who shall "guide them into ALL TRUTH." There are glaring doctrinal discrepancies between those two lines of text. If you can't see that you might want to ask yourself, am I a real believer? Have I ever truly trusted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior? Did God truly promise to preserve His word for all generations? If you can't answer in the affirmative you need to be saved through the blood of the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ. Btw, YES the story of the woman taken in adultery is INSPIRED SCRIPTURE and so are the last verses of Mark just for starters. I would not recommend any Bible that even suggested in the notes otherwise. Again, do you have the Spirit of God in you? Are you saved?

• 
  @Brian_L_A13 күн бұрын

  The Majority Text is slowly gaining support among scholars, for it is the real text. It may take a few decades, but the Majority Text will eventually overtake the Critical Text.

• 
  @user-sx2gj9tp3b15 күн бұрын

  Excellent video, but ´please, the word for the old majuscule manuscripts is UNCIAL, and not UNICAL.

• 
  @cryptoemcee17 күн бұрын

  Huge thanks, as I have understood, these are quotations from this book.

• 
  @MyNnavarro20 күн бұрын

  Well done👍🏽

• 
  @KyleHart_pixsymАй бұрын

  Seems odd you say the Papyrus was earliest... yet Dead Sea Scrolls dating to before Christ were mostly parchment. Perhaps the most notable being the great Isaiah scroll which was dated older than 100 BCE is made of 17 sheets of parchment. Kinda strange statement as I see it. Do you have sources you're leaning on for this claim? Also stating the writing style of miniscule came later seems equally odd. Would like to know your source for that also.

• 
  @CornerTalker29 күн бұрын

  This is in reference to New Testament manuscripts only. The oldest Old Testament bit is written on copper.

• 
  @pheriwinkleАй бұрын

  Unical is not a word... it's uncial. Also there were some fallacies in the formation of some of the arguments. Not the best video.

• 
  @kingofkingsreformedchurch7399Ай бұрын

  Thank you for this nice summary of the issues.

• 
  @yoshkebenstadapandora11812 ай бұрын

  Gnosticism was dominant in Alexandria? Isn't that a consideration here?

• 
  @Obediah0022 ай бұрын

  Uh, book of the Sini was called a fraud even back when it was found, and we know today it most certainly is a fraud. The book of Vatican is too considered dubious in it's promoters claimed age as its first mention in history is 1475. Both texts are of the corrupted/leavened Alexandrian source text. Wescott and Hort loved it as they hated the KJV which is of Traditional text line, the one we have and can trust. These two corrupted texts are today he basis for ALL modern Bible versions including NKJV and they are against over %99 of extant texts too btw, but scholars and blind christians have swallowed this corruption whole. kzread.info/dash/bejne/h41nppRsf72apaw.html

• 
  @madpoet16.2.152 ай бұрын

  Excellent work! Thanks.

• 
  @MrMeineNamen2 ай бұрын

  Not to get pedantic, but you’re using catch all phrases to describe belligerents here. Yes some LIBERALS might hold sympathies with leftists or progressives, you likely wouldn’t seeing them shake hands on the battlefield. Same goes with Conservatives and fascist militias. A second American civil war would not be one v one. It would probably pertain dozens of different factions fighting amongst themselves with wildly differing ideologies. Additionally, the US military might be fractured, but they may still be the most cohesive force in this kind of conflict. I expect Civil War 2 to look like a sporadic display of indiscriminate violence and massacres across the country, not so much a “blue vs red” battle line

• 
  @CornerTalker2 ай бұрын

  They might try to hold together as the Russian Whites did, but you are probably correct - too fractured - unless some unforeseen inciting event fractures the military as well.

• 
  @paultrosclair17753 ай бұрын

  I suggest that you watch "Netiher oldest nor best" by the King James Bible research council on KZread. It will shed more light on the subject.

• 
  @paultrosclair17753 ай бұрын

  Both Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are forgeries that didn't appear until much later.

• 
  @paultrosclair17753 ай бұрын

  You show an image of a page from Vaticanus as an example of 4th to 8th century manuscripts. However, it shows obvious initial drop caps. Initial drop caps were not used until the middle ages.

• 
  @JPH48863 ай бұрын

  @2:05 he should have included "that despite minor variations the monks missed, copies from those manuscript mistakes can be compared to properly copied manuscripts, because properly copied manuscripts were MUCH more plentiful" thus we could trace that we have God's Word

• 
  @bigt10133 ай бұрын

  Before I was Christian and researched eastern religions, I learned that Hero’s Journey comes from the Ramanaya which could be one of the oldest if it actually predates the odyssey. I don’t see how the Mew Testament is a Hero’s Journey though it doesn’t have any of the characteristics of one.

• 
  @alexjflow3 ай бұрын

  The only proof you need that the byzantine text is corrupted is Matthew chapter 5, verse 22. Satan uses this verse corruption to effectively alter the sixth commandment.

• 
  @mayginnes74763 ай бұрын

  This is a very helpful video. Thank you. Please be aware that the word is uncial, not unical.

• 
  @keithgale16413 ай бұрын

  ❤ I love this .

• 
  @johnsavard75833 ай бұрын

  I've seen it claimed that the numerous differnces between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are nearly all very minor differences. Also, since the Catholic Church used the Western Text (Gospels and Acts in Codex Bezae, Pauline Epistles in Codex Claromontanus) as the basis for most of the Old Testament in the Vetus Latina before Jerome, it should have gotten a little mention.

• 
  @TheSeptuagint4 ай бұрын

  I thank Adonai for leading me to this video. This is an issue I was completely in the dark about. Byzantine vs. Alexandrian. This coming from someone who is currently comparing and contrasting all the differences between the Septuagint and the Masoretic Text!

• 
  @CornerTalker4 ай бұрын

  Ex-Trump Aide Peter Navarro sent to prison. Mr. Navarro, 74, was sentenced to four months in prison in January for contempt of Congress after defying a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot.

• 
  @CornerTalker4 ай бұрын

  Stephanie Lambert, a pro-Trump attorney who pushed back against the results of the 2020 presidential election, was arrested Monday in Washington on a bench warrant from Michigan. “It has been nearly four years. When does it stop?” Davida Brook, an attorney for the company, said in court, according to the Post. Brook said Dominion has filed lawsuits “to stop the lies, to end the threats of violence.” She accused Lambert of “using these very lawsuits … to spread yet more lies and do yet more harm."

• 
  @caldylangoss22874 ай бұрын

  Nice work

• 
  @caldylangoss22874 ай бұрын

  Really nice work

• 
  @TheKingdomOfHeavenIsAtHand3335 ай бұрын

  so interesting thank you god bless

• 
  @CornerTalker5 ай бұрын

  I am uncertain where the number 5800 originated. Determining the actual number of manuscripts is difficult. Considering the ones in Greek: The Institute for New Testament Textual Research (INTF) in Münster, Germany has catalogued over 320 uncial codices, which are the older ones. However, many believe a few of these should be removed from the list (055 is actually a commentary; 0100, 0129, and 0192 are lectionaries; 0168 is lost; 0212 is a diatessaron; 0152 and 0153 are not manuscripts at all). The same institute has catalogued 2911 minuscule codices. These were generally created between 700 and the invention of the printing press. As of 2021, only 141 papyri fragments were known, and some of these have been judged to be fragments of the same original manuscript. Manuscripts also include at least 100 in Old Latin and many more of the Vulgate; also New Testament manuscripts in Syriac, German (Codex Koridethi, for example), and Ethiopian Ge’ez (The Garima Gospel).

• 
  @blackeyedturtle5 ай бұрын

  Over 5800 manuscripts is slightly misleading as close to 1000 are simply fragments and not what the average lay person would imagine to be understood as a "manuscript".

• 
  @alanmunch57795 ай бұрын

  Excellent overview, thank you.

• 
  @AeonsAegis5 ай бұрын

  thanks

• 
  @superproducercbiz5 ай бұрын

  Dope video 💯💯💯 I started with the NIV , slowly transitioning to the King james. As of now I’m reading them side to side.

• 
  @justinian4205 ай бұрын

  this is an outstanding summary of the issue. The visuals you composed are edifying.

• 
  @TheKingdomOfHeavenIsAtHand3335 ай бұрын

  amen

• 
  @Jaunyus5 ай бұрын

  Great video. It sums up the whole topic better than any other presentation I've seen before. Peace

• 
  @jonhenning5 ай бұрын

  It seems to me that the textual criticism of the alexandrian text pointing to writer errors can just be differences between the two.

• 
  @gregorynelson96826 ай бұрын

  Excellent video! Thank you!

• 
  @SaneNoMore6 ай бұрын

  At some points you overstate the affect of the variants. At no point do they concern Christian doctrine. Someone reading ANY of the textual schools will learn the same doctrinal teachings.

• 
  @SaneNoMore6 ай бұрын

  Meaningful, viable differences are found in less than 1% of the text. Most variants (like when you say 3000 of them in the Gospels) are simple spelling or word order differences and these make zero difference in translations (word order in Greek is not important like in English).

• 
  @einrazer6 ай бұрын

  I have been saying this was the same movie since the day that Atlantis came out.

• 
  @truthseeker33646 ай бұрын

  Mistake at 4:27mins. The Latin Vulgate was translated by Jerome from the Masoretic, NOT Lxx. He was even rebuked by St. Augustine for this. - Also the Latin Vulgate was not considered as standard by the Orthodox (Greek speaking Christians) because they always only followed the Lxx which was in their native language. It was however considered standard by the Catholic church of which the Orthodox church was part.

• 
  @CornerTalker6 ай бұрын

  thank you

• 
  @kelliejohnson37666 ай бұрын

  I am a Christian and trying to learn more about the history of how we have the Bible. This was easy to understand and provided a lot of information. Thank you!

• 
  @Hannah-J26 ай бұрын

  Thank you for the list. My fav is " Cross and the switchblade by David Wilkerson ", "God's smuggler by Brother Andrew, "Smith wigglesworth The secret of his power by Albert Hibbert". Also " Good morning Holy spirit- Benny hinn" (not purely an autobiography but still amazing)

• 
  @timothyIII19776 ай бұрын

  Just two quick points and a couple suggestions. First God preserved his Word according to many verses in the Scriptures. Second Desidarius Erasmus revised his work a total of 5 times to try to perfect it. I suggest you look into the writings of Hort and Wescott published after their deaths and definitely look up and listen to the testimony of repentance that Dr. Frank Logsdon gave. Dr. Logsdon wrote the Preface of the NASB version when it was first put out. It along with nearly ALL the new translations are based on the Hort, Wescott, Nestle and Aland Greek text. Then you can discern and decide for yourself what Scripture you should be using. God Bless All

• 
  @joseramonperez96095 ай бұрын

  The fact that NIV, CSB, HCSB, NET, ESV, NASB, LSB and many others are based on the work of these four non-real christians, it is evidence of how the enemy has blinded the eyes of most of the people involved in the work of translating these modern bible translations, what a big shame. Desideruis was used by God to bring us the real and trustworthy word of God, that's why the Reformers' translations are the way to follow.

• 
  @TheDmitriProject5 ай бұрын

  @@joseramonperez9609So God inspired Erasmus to lie about the last 6 verses of Revelation? Get out of here with the KJVonlyism. It’s 2024, that’s a tired gag.

• 
  @joseramonperez96095 ай бұрын

  @@TheDmitriProject Hi, I think that God used the *_Reformers_* to give us translations in English, Spanish, German, French, Italian and Portuguese from the most truthworthy sources, the latest modern translation have cut off verses which were part of the original, the manuscripts before the corrupted *_"Alexandrian manuscripts"_*

• 
  @joseramonperez96095 ай бұрын

  @@TheDmitriProject Hi, I'm not a KJVonlysm at all, I'm just seeing how the modern English Translations which almost all of them are based on the corrupted *_"Alexandrian manuscripts*"_** not in the earliest ones used by the **_*"Church Fathers"_* these corrupted manuscripts are the base for these translations which have cutt off important verses which were part of the *_Scriptures_* and that's the problem.

• 
  @ShepherdMinistry3 ай бұрын

  @@joseramonperez9609Thoughts on the johannine comma?

• 
  @dogewood54996 ай бұрын

  It goes without saying that a “Holocaust” had indeed occurred late in the War with Goebbel’s, Himmler’s, and Eichman’s “Final Solution”, (the numbers are anywhere between 1 - 6 million Jews depending on who you ask). Now, what is up for debate is the fact that Elie Wiesel had lied about his experience there: there is evidence that perhaps he wasn’t even imprisoned in any concentration camp whatsoever. Mr. Wiesel is still Human, and all Humans lie for whatever reasons that benefit them personally (or for perhaps a socio-political narrative). You should not be labeled as Antisemitic for calling out a liar just because he was Jewish. It should be: despite him being Jewish, he lied about his experiences and benefited from it (also his constituents and affiliates), while true concentration camp survivors did not and eventually called him out on his lies. I can recall whenever someone had asked to see Mr. Wiesel’s prisoner tattoos that he would often refuse, and had various reasons as to why. The photos of it were too blurry to make any real distinction that they were in fact prisoner numbers to begin with, and that was kinda suspicious…

• 
  @cognoscenticycles43517 ай бұрын

  A concise overview of the various manuscript traditions. Thanks for sharing that!

• 
  @samuelvasquez5897 ай бұрын

  This was an excellent and very interesting explanation of positions on both sides. This is what I refer to as objective evidence as opposed to the subjective one sided view of people like James White.

• 
  @vincent.mazkett1877 ай бұрын

  I have doctrinated by an Iglesia ni Cristo member and they didn't know any of these stuff, they are just only do bible quoting.