- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
„I had to be a cinephile, ciné-fils, a child of the cinema, mythologically born in such and such a film."
(SERGE DANEY)
When the french film critic Serge Daney (1944 - 1992) refers to himself as a cine-fils, he`s talking about his passionate adoration for cinema and the almost familial relation cinephile enters with films.
How do we live with cinema and its pictures? Where does cinema step out of the dark movie hall and adds something to the world? These are the questions CINE-FILS.com ist devoted to in its collection of interviews and essays.
The online magazine CINE-FILS.com offers free video interviews with filmmakers, artist, critics and scientists to start a dialouge about cinema. The interviews are accompanied by essays on the according topic.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MORE INTERVIEWS COMING SOON
SUBSCRIBE NOW
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EDITED BY: Felix von Boehm, Constantin Lieb
CONTRIBUTORS: Alexia Berkowicz, Felix von Boehm, Daniel Costelloe, Brian Fawcett, Constantin Lieb, Clemens von Lucius, Sebastian Seidler, Lina Maria Stahl, Alexander Waszynski, Felix Zwinzscher
Пікірлер
👏👏👏
Genius and my favorite filmmaker
I love her!!!!!
Representation.
Finally the algorithm brought us all here…wait….
incredible interviewer, Felix von Boehm. Standing up and applauding right now !!
a river of detritus with odd diamonds - love his films
I love to listen to Isabella and look at her beautiful & expressive!!
face!
Immer wieder ein Genuss, diesem Typen zuzuhören.
what a great man. we still miss you Harris.
Interesting insight into an interesting human being
wonderful. still appreciated 13 years later :)
such an open minded, curious beautiful magnificent artist!!
Such an insightful woman ❤
Partially for personal reasons...the particular point I was at in my life...seeing The Draughtman's Contract remains my favourite film and has affected my aethetics, preferences in narrative and sense of humour permanently. The Screen on the Hill at Belsize Park is fixed point in my firmament.
Thank you
great 👍👍👍
Charlotte's insights on looking and being seen are something I'd not thought about, but gave me pause. She's given so much to the cinema and I'm glad I found this interview. Thanks for posting it.
I'm in awe of Greenaway's talents as a director. His cinema is so original in comparison to anything else out there. I do not care for all of his films, but the ones I do appreciate, I really, really admire.
Anyone think seventh continent was boring af? It makes you uncomfortable…that’s fine…but at Least make it interesting…I like Polanski films better.. Haneke films makes for an unpleasant viewing… That’s his style and I don’t mind it….but dude you Can still make em interesting…I only like the piano teacher Of his.. and bennys video..his films might be impactful… But mostly they are all boring..
stick to Bollywood. haneks is too complex for you.
@@c.augustedupin8860damn
She is absolutely amazing.
thank you so much :)
I am an Ottinger I'm trying to find my history. Please contact me
Such a babe.
toller Komponist
holy shit. This video was posted October 8, 2012, and he died on October 9, 2012. How??
Keren, From Indonesian fans
You left too soon
he says "xenophia", did he meant "xenophobia"? I can´t find that word
It was definitely xenophobia, probably a mistake from the person who made the subtitles.
Its unfortunate that I think I already spoiled myself on the... meta aspect of Funny Games? Is that okay wording? I've heard as a viewer, I'm "incriminated". If "incriminate" means condemn, am I condemning myself even further for wanting to watch this motion picture out of pure curiosity for speculation? I don't think I'm mature at all. I'm only 17, so I don't know jack. I shouldn't watch a film so I can like the thought of myself "thinking deeply" about it while being entertained by what I presume to be "dark comedy" (I presume too, to say that Funny Games looks like an anti-comedy). I feel like I should look inward towards my taste in movies, and how "manipulation" is used bad or well in the stories I like.
I read over 6000 books 😲
Cool
It's interesting because modern film sadly isn't about seeing something new, rather it's about seeing something visualized that you have already seen, heard, read. Even the greats as Kubrick, Tarkovsky etc etc use books as their source material, I think what people crave is narrative, not visual stimuli there are plenty of "experimental" films that are pure visuals, and those aren't going to entertain someone for 3 hours. I do believe what he says has merit though I think people get stuck way to hard on traditional narrative structure and it ends up really limiting the types of storys and visuals you can use
You raise a good point - I think of modern day commercials - which do have some textual basis but are overall much more imagistic than narrative films. But nobody really remembers commercials - so it seems a greater context is needed for images to shine and that context seems to be narrative.
I like that.
Thank you so much for uploading, so deep and so much to learn.
Excuse the mound of text: Greenaway - and I'm only speaking to his films here - has always seemed to have this sort of tug and pull dichotomy between high society/high art and paradoxically the most banal, base aspects of culture, society, etc. He teeters somehow on a complex mirage of artifice and utterly stripped down, [poetically] simplistic, brutal frankness (often in a hellish inversion of British gentility, par for the satire) skewing on vulgar. And now having watched him more, I don't think it's all about the seamy underbelly of the jet set. I don't think he's entirely skewering or indicting these garish monstrosities at the subject of his films; is it fair to say that I think he actually identifies on some level with a bit of the, what many of us might assess to be, vapid glitz? He feels just as at home with the high-flown as much as the unpretentious. He vacillates from resistance to and embrace of these two clashing extremes. Like any good artist he's a bit of a walking contradiction, a self-negating mentality dominates his films, and this discrepancy produces some truly interesting, preposterously good works meditating on refined ugliness that are just as stilted, just as magniloquent..sometimes bloated, as they are incisive; cutting no doubt to the quick in all its starkness. Brash you could call him, and not one to tiptoe around class warfare. It's of course no coincidence that he often picks the incongruity of the genteel Victorian era [and the opposing flotsam of society] to canvas tasteful 'filth'. The result is a very different film each time. No film - or few - is etched in the same rhythms. They're mental exercises divested of complete linearity a fair portion of the time. He rigorously follows conventions of aesthetic beauty in one sense and then bends them. You can tell he takes painstaking measures to assert that no film is alike - I can tell, and I praise that. Often the movies will have some otherworldly Nicolas Roeg-worthy pacing with an ambiguous stew of tonalities that I'm not sure you can altogether call surreal anymore, because that term has worn out its welcome. He usually hits all the right notes, to me. He's an uneven director. But a great one, as I see it. One that can't be overlooked. Each of his films are so suffused with his DNA that you can't not be at least intrigued by the imprint on the sums of its parts. Somewhere, he is situated on some elevated plane of madness that shouldn't be addressed too exigently, as we'd lose someone touched in the head for the greater service of art, you see. Peter Greenaway is at his best when he is at his worst if that makes any sense. When he does not glad-hand the viewer with subtext too viciously spelt out he is on fire.
Great insights and philosophy, I could listen for hours
This son of a bitch, Michael Haneke, says that he cannot stand to see violence, that he is extremely scared of violence, and yet he abuses and slays animals for the purpose of his stories. He says that he has never been beaten. He should be beaten to death. I had respect for this author. Now, not any more. Because he is a despicable liar.
Wonderful
❤️
Nice tips
You see somone beating somone else it is definitely your business.
Merci!
very interesting!
Aagghh ! I’m having a Mandela moment ... his name has always been Wim Wender ??
Great person who works a lot with Claire Denis !! :-D
I feel so grateful to film-makers like Greenaway, or Tarkovsky, or Bergman for pushing the medium in directions not normally explored by mainstream Hollywood, for instance. Film is a relatively young medium and as such still very malleable (or should be). Why always linear narratives? Why always explanatory dialogue or voice-over's? Trust (or educate) your audience, film-makers!! Do we always (immediately or at all) "understand" every work of art we experience? Of course not, so why should film be any different!?!
People are taught that if they are not told meaning then there must be none. It's quite sad actually.
Greenaway tought us one amazing way to understand films, but he is not obsessed by the idea to understand a movie completly. Therefore I'm grateful that artists like Tarkowski, Greenaway, Almodóvar, Hosokawa, Hitchcock and the unforgotten Pina Bausch from Wuppertal Dance Théâtre influenced my way of thinking, self-awareness and reflection a lot. The "Greenaway" episode in my life was just the moment, when I decided to study chemistry, not art history. I'm quite worried about the uncertain future of small cinemas in the SarsCov Crisis, about the influence of mainstream Hollywood and Bollywood, and moreover about the way Netflix is concepting new films based only on economic success, to fulfill the "obvious" expectations of the audience. The level of physical violence, horror and bizarre stunts in so-called "Block Busters" is disgusting and far from real, far from Vilsmaier. My recommendation is 16 y.o. Grace Vanderwaal, not the Disney movie, but her music and poetry, she went on headline tour with her band and her dog at the age of 13, she's at least as funny and inspiring as literature nobel price winner Elfriede Jelinek.
Le Hasard vous a envoyé à nous à travers vos films, vos réflexions, comme il a bien fait les choses ! Comme j'aurais aimé pouvoir passer un peu de temps avec vous, vous voir réaliser votre (vos) métier(s) et entretenir une discussion avec vous. Hélas cela ne se fera pas puisque vous nous avez quitté il y a quelques jours ! Quelques jours seulement, mais vous nous manquez déjà, Madame. Je n'oublierai pas ce vendredi 29 mars 2019 où j'ai appris votre décès. Vous avez suivi de quelques semaines Michel Legrand et j'espère que vous vous êtes retrouvé tous les 3 avec votre Grand Amour Jacques Demy. Il nous reste vos œuvres à tous trois, mais votre absence est définitivement un gouffre. Vous étiez 3 génies, mais 3 génies Humains, ce qui manque à beaucoup de gens que l'on dit également être des génies (et qui le pensent...). Au revoir Madame,. Merci d'avoir été. J'espère que les générations suivantes vous découvriront et continueront à transmettre notre admiration pour vous.
#AvantGarde #pretentious #talentless #shite 💩
Warum bleiben Leute auf der Autobahn stehen wenns einen Unfall gab? WEIL ES FAHRERFLUCHT WÄRE WENN MAN DAS NICHT TUN WÜRDE! Duh. Wtf. Oder gibts so ne Straftat wie Fahrerflucht nich in Österreich? Is doch selbstverständlich dass man bei nem Unfall stehenbleibt und versucht zu helfen.
da hats jemand offensichtlich nicht verstanden;)
pleasure + duration = time