Where is Peace Show people, Always said Peaceful Angel,Show ? Money give to Rich nothing done for same people,Same as Kerala politics party.😮😮😮😂😂😂 Any Ankokia Patrick BAVA was in CM, Clips house? And In Amarica Under Home land security system ,Moran are you put your identity on Ketala politics man feet? Who was tell you doing this they are Siners not weked people.😢😢😢
@jacobgeorge548422 күн бұрын
Indian Orthodox Church not responsible for what they done for Patrick Bava! Jacobites people always come to Old Church for Holy,A Bishop made a Small church and said to Patrick Bava this is your church go thair this is shime and play against the Holy Spirit?❤❤❤❤
@danielvarghese41835 ай бұрын
Hypocrisy is the most hatred sin according to the scripture. Hope and pray, the patriarch remembers that the "Yacob Burdenah was ordained by the Coptic Church during the zurich church crisis, but the Coptic Pop never did this atrocities to the Antioch Syriac Church" May God Almighty pour His blessings to the patriarch, and provide devine heavenly wisdom.
@danielvarghese41835 ай бұрын
St Mathew: 18:35 "So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses".
@jacobgeorge548410 ай бұрын
Time is changed / zIs need a change, with G20 India. ❤❤❤
@aliasrejipaul-xu1jd11 ай бұрын
😮
@nithinyacobc Жыл бұрын
Amen
@eldhosepa4473 Жыл бұрын
Amen. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
@varghesepjparackal55342 жыл бұрын
പട്ടം ഇല്ലാത്ത താറാവ് പാപ്പി യോഹന്നാനെ എന്തിനാണ് സ്റ്റേജിൽ ഇരുത്തിയിരിക്കുന്നത്,, 👎
@tisho19242 жыл бұрын
Amen
@soumyaabraham3792 жыл бұрын
Ashik mb
@philipshealthcareservices77182 жыл бұрын
Prayerful wishes to the newly ordained 🙏
@shirlychacko75322 жыл бұрын
Blessed moments
@mathewchacko31013 жыл бұрын
പരുമല പള്ളിയോ? വിഘടൻ്റെ തമാശകൾ
@daveedyohannan99283 жыл бұрын
Prayer
@stallangeorge65173 жыл бұрын
Thank God
@peacefilledsoul75953 жыл бұрын
Is Syrian Patriarch creating spilts and issues everywhere including India (Malankara Orthodox Church) for power and money? Check videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a3uIqqp-gLvAe6g.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/dYGmlppuftqXoMo.html It is felt without money from India they cannot survive: kzread.info
@peacefilledsoul75953 жыл бұрын
Church Case was started by the failed side (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobite_Syrian_Christian_Church)/ (syriacpatriarchate.org/) by siezing the assets of Malankara Orthodox Church in India by force. (Now failed side don't like to honour final supreme court verdict and resorting to violence and Anti Jesus teachings in India under the able leadership of (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_Aphrem_II) ? Matthew 22:21 Jesus said "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God the things that are God's." Romans 13:1 "Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities.
@peacefilledsoul75953 жыл бұрын
"Bare Facts: Simply stated its an asset dispute case. Simplest Solution: The leaders of failed side shall respect final court verdict. They should stop instigation of followers to violence. They should vacate the properties and assets forcibly kept under their possession. Rest of the arguments now for peace, Christ, belief etc. by failed side and their supporters from various sides is just for misguiding people. Key Essence: Rule of Law should prevail in India and Supreme Court final judgements should be implemented by all State Governments including Kerala." For quick info, Refer KZread Videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d66nvMiMYM6nY8o.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/aY2d3NugYJSth8Y.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/a4ps1LmxksKuk7w.html For Truth of the Church Case, Refer to Supreme Court Latest Order of 06 Sep 2019 and Final Judgement of 03 Jul 2017 (Especially last few pages) in the Representative Suit. Any layman can understand the clear instructions / order of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Order and Judgement Links: main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2013/32130/32130_2013_Order_03-Jul-2017.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/2609/2609_2019_Order_15-Feb-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/11346/11346_2019_Order_08-Apr-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/16323/16323_2019_4_22_14633_Order_02-Jul-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/22350/22350_2019_4_6_16498_Judgement_06-Sep-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/31451/31451_2019_3_15_18255_Order_18-Nov-2019.pdf It can be seen that all issues were clearly addressed in the Hon. Supreme Court Judgement with absolute clarity in favour of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, India. Basic thing is Puthencruz Society Group/ Patriarch faction of Bishops and Priests (Claims as Jacobite ) needs to accept their continued defeat in the cases and inform real truth to the innocent followers. They should accept the reality and refrain from creating law and order situations through emotions instigations: by establishing Parallel Administrations and grab power for their existence (Money, Power) against the Supreme Court Order. At the same time every judgement implementation depends on Executive will to implement final Judiciary Judgements to ensure rule of law. Relevant Quotes from Supreme Court Order of 2019 Page 1 - 7: " 2. ............ This Court has passed several judgments and orders to the effect that no such interference can be made by any court after the decision has been rendered by this Court in a representative suit which is binding on all concerned and it is the constitutional duty of all concerned to obey the judgment and order of this Court. As per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law declared by this Court is binding on all courts and under Article 144, civil and judicial authorities within the territory of India shall act in aid of Supreme Court. Kerala being Indian Territory all concerned are bound to act accordingly. We have intended peace to come in Church but due to such orders passed in contravention of law laid down by this Court law can never be obeyed. This amount to a violation of judgment and order. The High Court has passed an interim order in violation of the judgments and orders passed by this Court. We are not able to understand what kind of judicial discipline is reflected while passing the impugned order, which should not have been passed at all. We restrain all the Civil Courts and the High Court in Kerala not to pass any order in violation of the mandate of this Court's decision in K.S. Varghese (supra)." (supra). 3. The appeal arises out of the suit, pending before the High Court, is disposed of in terms of the decision passed by this Court in K.S. Varghese (supra) as there is no scope left for further litigation on the issue. The High Court has no right to tinker with the judgment and order passed by this Court which is binding and the judicial propriety has to be maintained at all costs. There is no scope for further litigation in the matter which we have concluded. We direct the Courts to decide all pending matters following the aforesaid decision which has been affirmed thereafter by umpteen number of times. 6. It is made clear to all concerned more so, to the Courts that in future the violation of judgment and order to be viewed seriously. Let similar matters which are pending be decided following aforesaid judgment and order. There can be no further litigation as the decision in representative suit is binding." Quotes from Supreme Court Final Judgement of 2017 Page 266-274: Catholicos & Malankara Metropolitan Power: "(v) The Primate of Orthodox Syrian Church of the East is Catholicos. He enjoys spiritual powers as well, as the Malankara Metropolitan. Malankara Metropolitan has the prime jurisdiction regarding temporal, ecclesiastical and spiritual administration of Malankara Church subject to the riders provided in the 1934 Constitution." Syrian Jacobite Patriarch Power: "(vi) Full effect has to be given to the finding that the spiritual power of the Patriarch has reached to a vanishing point. Consequently, he cannot interfere in the governance of Parish Churches by appointing Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. and thereby cannot create a parallel system of administration. The appointment has to be made as per the power conferred under the 1934 Constitution on the concerned Diocese, Metropolitan etc. (xix) The authority of Patriarch had never extended to the government of temporalities of the Churches. By questioning the action of the Patriarch and his undue interference in the administration of Churches in violation of the 1995 judgment, it cannot be said that the Catholicos faction is guilty of repudiating the spiritual supremacy of the Patriarch. The Patriarch faction is to be blamed for the situation which has been created post 1995 judgment. The property of the Church is to be managed as per the 1934 Constitution. The judgment of 1995 has not been respected by the Patriarch faction which was binding on all concerned. Filing of writ petitions in the High Court by the Catholicos faction was to deter the Patriarch/his representatives to appoint the Vicar etc. in violation of the 1995 judgment of this Court." Right of believer: "(vii) Though it is open to the individual member to leave a Church in exercise of the right not to be a member of any Association and as per Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Parish Assembly of the Church by majority or otherwise cannot decide to move church out of the Malankara Church. Once a trust, is always a trust. (viii) When the Church has been created and is for the benefit of the beneficiaries, it is not open for the beneficiaries, even by a majority, to usurp its property or management. The Malankara Church is in the form of a trust in which, its properties have vested. As per the 1934 Constitution, the Parishioners though may individually leave the Church, they are not permitted to take the movable or immovable properties out of the ambit of 1934 Constitution without the approval of the Church hierarchy." Vicar: "(xiv) Appointment of Vicar is a secular matter. There is no violation of any of the rights encompassed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India, if the appointment of Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. is made as per the 1934 Constitution. The Patriarch has no power to interfere in such matters under the guise of spiritual supremacy unless the 1934 Constitution is amended in accordance with law. The same is binding on all concerned." Church, its Properties and the Cemetry: "(xvii) The Church and the Cemetry cannot be confiscated by anybody. It has to remain with the Parishioners as per the customary rights and nobody can be deprived of the right to enjoy the same as a Parishioner in the Church or to be buried honourably in the cemetery, in case he continues to have faith in the Malankara Church. The property of the Malankara Church in which is also vested the property of the Parish Churches, would remain in trust as it has for the time immemorial for the sake of the beneficiaries and no one can claim to be owners thereof even by majority and usurp the Church and the properties. (xx) The 1934 Constitution is enforceable at present and the plea of its frustration or breach is not available to the Patriarch faction. Once there is Malankara Church, it has to remain as such including the property. No group or denomination by majority or otherwise can take away the management or the property as that would virtually tantamount to illegal interference in the management and illegal usurpation of its properties. It is not open to the beneficiaries even by majority to change the nature of the Church, its property and management. The only method to change management is to amend the Constitution of 1934 in accordance with law. It is not open to the Parish Churches to even frame bye-laws in violation of the provisions of the 1934 Constitution. (xxvi) The 1934 Constitution is appropriate and adequate for management of the Parish Churches, as such there is no necessity of framing a scheme under section 92 of the CPC." Puthencruz Society Group Constitution: "(xxiv) The formation of 2002 Constitution is the result of illegal and void exercise. It cannot be recognized and the parallel system created thereunder for administration of Parish Churches of Malankara Church cannot hold the field. It has to be administered under the 1934 Constitution." Shared Services: "(xxvii) The plea that in face of the prevailing dissension between the two factions and the remote possibility of reconciliation, the religious services may be permitted to be conducted by two Vicars of each faith cannot be accepted as that would amount to patronizing parallel systems of administration."
@innerpeace40433 жыл бұрын
"Rule of Law should prevail in India and Supreme Court final judgements should be respected by all State Governments including Kerala:" For quick info, Refer KZread Videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d66nvMiMYM6nY8o.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/aY2d3NugYJSth8Y.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/a4ps1LmxksKuk7w.html For Truth of the Church Case, Refer to Supreme Court Latest Order of 06 Sep 2019 and Final Judgement of 03 Jul 2017 (Especially last few pages) in the Representative Suit. Any layman can understand the clear instructions / order of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Order and Judgement Links: main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2013/32130/32130_2013_Order_03-Jul-2017.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/2609/2609_2019_Order_15-Feb-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/11346/11346_2019_Order_08-Apr-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/16323/16323_2019_4_22_14633_Order_02-Jul-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/22350/22350_2019_4_6_16498_Judgement_06-Sep-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/31451/31451_2019_3_15_18255_Order_18-Nov-2019.pdf It can be seen that all issues were clearly addressed in the Hon. Supreme Court Judgement with absolute clarity in favour of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, India. Basic thing is Puthencruz Society Group/ Patriarch faction of Bishops and Priests (Claims as Jacobite ) needs to accept their continued defeat in the cases and inform real truth to the innocent followers. They should accept the reality and refrain from creating law and order situations through emotions instigations: by establishing Parallel Administrations and grab power for their existence (Money, Power) against the Supreme Court Order. At the same time every judgement implementation depends on Executive will to implement final Judiciary Judgements to ensure rule of law. Relevant Quotes from Supreme Court Order of 2019 Page 1 - 7: " 2. ............ This Court has passed several judgments and orders to the effect that no such interference can be made by any court after the decision has been rendered by this Court in a representative suit which is binding on all concerned and it is the constitutional duty of all concerned to obey the judgment and order of this Court. As per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law declared by this Court is binding on all courts and under Article 144, civil and judicial authorities within the territory of India shall act in aid of Supreme Court. Kerala being Indian Territory all concerned are bound to act accordingly. We have intended peace to come in Church but due to such orders passed in contravention of law laid down by this Court law can never be obeyed. This amount to a violation of judgment and order. The High Court has passed an interim order in violation of the judgments and orders passed by this Court. We are not able to understand what kind of judicial discipline is reflected while passing the impugned order, which should not have been passed at all. We restrain all the Civil Courts and the High Court in Kerala not to pass any order in violation of the mandate of this Court's decision in K.S. Varghese (supra)." (supra). 3. The appeal arises out of the suit, pending before the High Court, is disposed of in terms of the decision passed by this Court in K.S. Varghese (supra) as there is no scope left for further litigation on the issue. The High Court has no right to tinker with the judgment and order passed by this Court which is binding and the judicial propriety has to be maintained at all costs. There is no scope for further litigation in the matter which we have concluded. We direct the Courts to decide all pending matters following the aforesaid decision which has been affirmed thereafter by umpteen number of times. 6. It is made clear to all concerned more so, to the Courts that in future the violation of judgment and order to be viewed seriously. Let similar matters which are pending be decided following aforesaid judgment and order. There can be no further litigation as the decision in representative suit is binding." Quotes from Supreme Court Final Judgement of 2017 Page 266-274: Catholicos & Malankara Metropolitan Power: "(v) The Primate of Orthodox Syrian Church of the East is Catholicos. He enjoys spiritual powers as well, as the Malankara Metropolitan. Malankara Metropolitan has the prime jurisdiction regarding temporal, ecclesiastical and spiritual administration of Malankara Church subject to the riders provided in the 1934 Constitution." Syrian Jacobite Patriarch Power: "(vi) Full effect has to be given to the finding that the spiritual power of the Patriarch has reached to a vanishing point. Consequently, he cannot interfere in the governance of Parish Churches by appointing Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. and thereby cannot create a parallel system of administration. The appointment has to be made as per the power conferred under the 1934 Constitution on the concerned Diocese, Metropolitan etc. (xix) The authority of Patriarch had never extended to the government of temporalities of the Churches. By questioning the action of the Patriarch and his undue interference in the administration of Churches in violation of the 1995 judgment, it cannot be said that the Catholicos faction is guilty of repudiating the spiritual supremacy of the Patriarch. The Patriarch faction is to be blamed for the situation which has been created post 1995 judgment. The property of the Church is to be managed as per the 1934 Constitution. The judgment of 1995 has not been respected by the Patriarch faction which was binding on all concerned. Filing of writ petitions in the High Court by the Catholicos faction was to deter the Patriarch/his representatives to appoint the Vicar etc. in violation of the 1995 judgment of this Court." Right of believer: "(vii) Though it is open to the individual member to leave a Church in exercise of the right not to be a member of any Association and as per Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Parish Assembly of the Church by majority or otherwise cannot decide to move church out of the Malankara Church. Once a trust, is always a trust. (viii) When the Church has been created and is for the benefit of the beneficiaries, it is not open for the beneficiaries, even by a majority, to usurp its property or management. The Malankara Church is in the form of a trust in which, its properties have vested. As per the 1934 Constitution, the Parishioners though may individually leave the Church, they are not permitted to take the movable or immovable properties out of the ambit of 1934 Constitution without the approval of the Church hierarchy." Vicar: "(xiv) Appointment of Vicar is a secular matter. There is no violation of any of the rights encompassed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India, if the appointment of Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. is made as per the 1934 Constitution. The Patriarch has no power to interfere in such matters under the guise of spiritual supremacy unless the 1934 Constitution is amended in accordance with law. The same is binding on all concerned." Church, its Properties and the Cemetry: "(xvii) The Church and the Cemetry cannot be confiscated by anybody. It has to remain with the Parishioners as per the customary rights and nobody can be deprived of the right to enjoy the same as a Parishioner in the Church or to be buried honourably in the cemetery, in case he continues to have faith in the Malankara Church. The property of the Malankara Church in which is also vested the property of the Parish Churches, would remain in trust as it has for the time immemorial for the sake of the beneficiaries and no one can claim to be owners thereof even by majority and usurp the Church and the properties. (xx) The 1934 Constitution is enforceable at present and the plea of its frustration or breach is not available to the Patriarch faction. Once there is Malankara Church, it has to remain as such including the property. No group or denomination by majority or otherwise can take away the management or the property as that would virtually tantamount to illegal interference in the management and illegal usurpation of its properties. It is not open to the beneficiaries even by majority to change the nature of the Church, its property and management. The only method to change management is to amend the Constitution of 1934 in accordance with law. It is not open to the Parish Churches to even frame bye-laws in violation of the provisions of the 1934 Constitution. (xxvi) The 1934 Constitution is appropriate and adequate for management of the Parish Churches, as such there is no necessity of framing a scheme under section 92 of the CPC." Puthencruz Society Group Constitution: "(xxiv) The formation of 2002 Constitution is the result of illegal and void exercise. It cannot be recognized and the parallel system created thereunder for administration of Parish Churches of Malankara Church cannot hold the field. It has to be administered under the 1934 Constitution." Shared Services: "(xxvii) The plea that in face of the prevailing dissension between the two factions and the remote possibility of reconciliation, the religious services may be permitted to be conducted by two Vicars of each faith cannot be accepted as that would amount to patronizing parallel systems of administration."
@philippm13474 жыл бұрын
ഏന്താ കഥ! നാലാം തലമുറക്കാരൻ ജൊസഫ് മോർ ഗ്രിഗോറിയോസ് തിരുമേനി! അദ്ദേഹത്തിൻ്റെ കൈയ്യിൽ തിരുശേഷി പ്പുണ്ട് എന്ന്! അപ്പോൾ പരുമലയിലൊ! ഇവർ പരസ്പരം മൽസരിക്കയാണ്;
@philippm13474 жыл бұрын
ഉപ്പിനൊളം വരുമോ ഉപ്പിലിട്ടത്.? പരുമല പള്ളി ഉള്ളപ്പോൾ മറ്റൊരു പള്ളി! പരുമല പള്ളിയിൽ ഏല്ലാവർക്കും പോകാം പ്രാർത്തിക്കാൻ അവസരം അവിടെ ഉണ്ട്.
@abinbabu89914 жыл бұрын
പറഞ്ഞത് ശരി തന്നെ... athu പറയുമ്പോൾ ഒന്ന് ചിന്തിച്ചേ... സിറിയൻ ഓർത്തഡോൿസ് എന്നതിനോട് പകരം ആകുമോ ഇന്ത്യൻ ഓർത്തഡോൿസ് സിറിയൻ എന്നു പറയുന്നത്...
@philippm13474 жыл бұрын
Shri.കെ.പി.യോഹന്നാൻ മെത്രാൻ അത്താനാസിയൊസ് ആയി 'എന്താ വേഷം!. മുടി നീട്ടി- യു ഹാനൊൻ മോർ അത്താനാസിയോസ് എന്ന പേരും.കല്യാണം കഴിച്ചു കുട്ടികളും ഉണ്ട് ' നല്ല കാശുണ്ട്.
@abrahamej38372 жыл бұрын
Ippon oan njammante aala ...
@shanthageorge82544 жыл бұрын
Wish we the common man of India could raise our voice against the foolish decisions and actions taken by the hot-headed, biased Supreme Court judges. We are now ashamed of the ones highly respected Supreme Court.
@trueworship65 жыл бұрын
A humble request to the followers. Please open your Bible and read; at least the 4 Gospels. Jesus have mercy! Open their eyes to see you.
parumala vanna seminary palleykall Thomas 1 qurbana cholleytta undo
@unnikrishnanmk14735 жыл бұрын
His crown was from the heaven give by the God he is sitting in throne of Peter which right was give by Jesus when Peter say to Jesus you're son of God👑👑👑
@mathewvmathew13575 жыл бұрын
Save us.
@ramachandrant84266 жыл бұрын
except Jesus no one deserve greatness.
@ramachandrant84266 жыл бұрын
that crown worn is anti crist.because he receive great importance than Jesus.
@josephmy9094 Жыл бұрын
The crown is eternal and moran got from heaven and the crown will be remain forever 🙏🙏🙏
@ramachandrant84266 жыл бұрын
why do cristians give great importants to a man? why do crowd shouted at him? then who is great a man or Jesus ? Acts 4-12.Jesus is the maddiastan, the God then whoelse ?
@mariajohn136 жыл бұрын
he is the representative o our christ why do hindu give importance to sai baba whydo muslims give importance to tipu
@chackojames6 жыл бұрын
He is syrian christians holy father.. we won't pray to him but we are respecting and faith full to him than any priest who living in this world ...
@ramachandrant84266 жыл бұрын
Why did cristians great importans to a man? why do believers shout at him , whether he is God ? quite unfortunate it is adegradation of cristianity.cristians must think in sense . Acts 4-12.
@bijuphilipvilloth3 жыл бұрын
u cant understand
@ramachandrant84266 жыл бұрын
Acts 4 te 12.All dies except Jesus(God) How a dead man save and pray for us
Where can I get this song: christhuvin aayi thirusabha il ?
@jacobgeorge548410 ай бұрын
First, stop this nonsense, think we are under Christ, our mother is our mother India is our mother, He Moran is always our leader/ Father of the Church, who made it Catholics from India. So learn and understand more not lessons from blinds both together go to hole.😂😂❤❤❤
@georgecherian65209 жыл бұрын
Very good service. I would like to see more disipline in a church. It is not a political convention. How do we control a croud in India?. People should be educated to control their imotions atleast in a church service.
@cijoykjose6 жыл бұрын
George Cherian True...
@cijoykjose6 жыл бұрын
George Cherian Also people acting like a celebrity coming or forcing each other to touch him..
@truth-digest24829 жыл бұрын
is he the one having all authority in heaven and earth?
Пікірлер
Where is Peace Show people, Always said Peaceful Angel,Show ? Money give to Rich nothing done for same people,Same as Kerala politics party.😮😮😮😂😂😂 Any Ankokia Patrick BAVA was in CM, Clips house? And In Amarica Under Home land security system ,Moran are you put your identity on Ketala politics man feet? Who was tell you doing this they are Siners not weked people.😢😢😢
Indian Orthodox Church not responsible for what they done for Patrick Bava! Jacobites people always come to Old Church for Holy,A Bishop made a Small church and said to Patrick Bava this is your church go thair this is shime and play against the Holy Spirit?❤❤❤❤
Hypocrisy is the most hatred sin according to the scripture. Hope and pray, the patriarch remembers that the "Yacob Burdenah was ordained by the Coptic Church during the zurich church crisis, but the Coptic Pop never did this atrocities to the Antioch Syriac Church" May God Almighty pour His blessings to the patriarch, and provide devine heavenly wisdom.
St Mathew: 18:35 "So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses".
Time is changed / zIs need a change, with G20 India. ❤❤❤
😮
Amen
Amen. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
പട്ടം ഇല്ലാത്ത താറാവ് പാപ്പി യോഹന്നാനെ എന്തിനാണ് സ്റ്റേജിൽ ഇരുത്തിയിരിക്കുന്നത്,, 👎
Amen
Ashik mb
Prayerful wishes to the newly ordained 🙏
Blessed moments
പരുമല പള്ളിയോ? വിഘടൻ്റെ തമാശകൾ
Prayer
Thank God
Is Syrian Patriarch creating spilts and issues everywhere including India (Malankara Orthodox Church) for power and money? Check videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a3uIqqp-gLvAe6g.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/dYGmlppuftqXoMo.html It is felt without money from India they cannot survive: kzread.info
Church Case was started by the failed side (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobite_Syrian_Christian_Church)/ (syriacpatriarchate.org/) by siezing the assets of Malankara Orthodox Church in India by force. (Now failed side don't like to honour final supreme court verdict and resorting to violence and Anti Jesus teachings in India under the able leadership of (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_Aphrem_II) ? Matthew 22:21 Jesus said "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God the things that are God's." Romans 13:1 "Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities.
"Bare Facts: Simply stated its an asset dispute case. Simplest Solution: The leaders of failed side shall respect final court verdict. They should stop instigation of followers to violence. They should vacate the properties and assets forcibly kept under their possession. Rest of the arguments now for peace, Christ, belief etc. by failed side and their supporters from various sides is just for misguiding people. Key Essence: Rule of Law should prevail in India and Supreme Court final judgements should be implemented by all State Governments including Kerala." For quick info, Refer KZread Videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d66nvMiMYM6nY8o.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/aY2d3NugYJSth8Y.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/a4ps1LmxksKuk7w.html For Truth of the Church Case, Refer to Supreme Court Latest Order of 06 Sep 2019 and Final Judgement of 03 Jul 2017 (Especially last few pages) in the Representative Suit. Any layman can understand the clear instructions / order of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Order and Judgement Links: main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2013/32130/32130_2013_Order_03-Jul-2017.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/2609/2609_2019_Order_15-Feb-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/11346/11346_2019_Order_08-Apr-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/16323/16323_2019_4_22_14633_Order_02-Jul-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/22350/22350_2019_4_6_16498_Judgement_06-Sep-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/31451/31451_2019_3_15_18255_Order_18-Nov-2019.pdf It can be seen that all issues were clearly addressed in the Hon. Supreme Court Judgement with absolute clarity in favour of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, India. Basic thing is Puthencruz Society Group/ Patriarch faction of Bishops and Priests (Claims as Jacobite ) needs to accept their continued defeat in the cases and inform real truth to the innocent followers. They should accept the reality and refrain from creating law and order situations through emotions instigations: by establishing Parallel Administrations and grab power for their existence (Money, Power) against the Supreme Court Order. At the same time every judgement implementation depends on Executive will to implement final Judiciary Judgements to ensure rule of law. Relevant Quotes from Supreme Court Order of 2019 Page 1 - 7: " 2. ............ This Court has passed several judgments and orders to the effect that no such interference can be made by any court after the decision has been rendered by this Court in a representative suit which is binding on all concerned and it is the constitutional duty of all concerned to obey the judgment and order of this Court. As per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law declared by this Court is binding on all courts and under Article 144, civil and judicial authorities within the territory of India shall act in aid of Supreme Court. Kerala being Indian Territory all concerned are bound to act accordingly. We have intended peace to come in Church but due to such orders passed in contravention of law laid down by this Court law can never be obeyed. This amount to a violation of judgment and order. The High Court has passed an interim order in violation of the judgments and orders passed by this Court. We are not able to understand what kind of judicial discipline is reflected while passing the impugned order, which should not have been passed at all. We restrain all the Civil Courts and the High Court in Kerala not to pass any order in violation of the mandate of this Court's decision in K.S. Varghese (supra)." (supra). 3. The appeal arises out of the suit, pending before the High Court, is disposed of in terms of the decision passed by this Court in K.S. Varghese (supra) as there is no scope left for further litigation on the issue. The High Court has no right to tinker with the judgment and order passed by this Court which is binding and the judicial propriety has to be maintained at all costs. There is no scope for further litigation in the matter which we have concluded. We direct the Courts to decide all pending matters following the aforesaid decision which has been affirmed thereafter by umpteen number of times. 6. It is made clear to all concerned more so, to the Courts that in future the violation of judgment and order to be viewed seriously. Let similar matters which are pending be decided following aforesaid judgment and order. There can be no further litigation as the decision in representative suit is binding." Quotes from Supreme Court Final Judgement of 2017 Page 266-274: Catholicos & Malankara Metropolitan Power: "(v) The Primate of Orthodox Syrian Church of the East is Catholicos. He enjoys spiritual powers as well, as the Malankara Metropolitan. Malankara Metropolitan has the prime jurisdiction regarding temporal, ecclesiastical and spiritual administration of Malankara Church subject to the riders provided in the 1934 Constitution." Syrian Jacobite Patriarch Power: "(vi) Full effect has to be given to the finding that the spiritual power of the Patriarch has reached to a vanishing point. Consequently, he cannot interfere in the governance of Parish Churches by appointing Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. and thereby cannot create a parallel system of administration. The appointment has to be made as per the power conferred under the 1934 Constitution on the concerned Diocese, Metropolitan etc. (xix) The authority of Patriarch had never extended to the government of temporalities of the Churches. By questioning the action of the Patriarch and his undue interference in the administration of Churches in violation of the 1995 judgment, it cannot be said that the Catholicos faction is guilty of repudiating the spiritual supremacy of the Patriarch. The Patriarch faction is to be blamed for the situation which has been created post 1995 judgment. The property of the Church is to be managed as per the 1934 Constitution. The judgment of 1995 has not been respected by the Patriarch faction which was binding on all concerned. Filing of writ petitions in the High Court by the Catholicos faction was to deter the Patriarch/his representatives to appoint the Vicar etc. in violation of the 1995 judgment of this Court." Right of believer: "(vii) Though it is open to the individual member to leave a Church in exercise of the right not to be a member of any Association and as per Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Parish Assembly of the Church by majority or otherwise cannot decide to move church out of the Malankara Church. Once a trust, is always a trust. (viii) When the Church has been created and is for the benefit of the beneficiaries, it is not open for the beneficiaries, even by a majority, to usurp its property or management. The Malankara Church is in the form of a trust in which, its properties have vested. As per the 1934 Constitution, the Parishioners though may individually leave the Church, they are not permitted to take the movable or immovable properties out of the ambit of 1934 Constitution without the approval of the Church hierarchy." Vicar: "(xiv) Appointment of Vicar is a secular matter. There is no violation of any of the rights encompassed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India, if the appointment of Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. is made as per the 1934 Constitution. The Patriarch has no power to interfere in such matters under the guise of spiritual supremacy unless the 1934 Constitution is amended in accordance with law. The same is binding on all concerned." Church, its Properties and the Cemetry: "(xvii) The Church and the Cemetry cannot be confiscated by anybody. It has to remain with the Parishioners as per the customary rights and nobody can be deprived of the right to enjoy the same as a Parishioner in the Church or to be buried honourably in the cemetery, in case he continues to have faith in the Malankara Church. The property of the Malankara Church in which is also vested the property of the Parish Churches, would remain in trust as it has for the time immemorial for the sake of the beneficiaries and no one can claim to be owners thereof even by majority and usurp the Church and the properties. (xx) The 1934 Constitution is enforceable at present and the plea of its frustration or breach is not available to the Patriarch faction. Once there is Malankara Church, it has to remain as such including the property. No group or denomination by majority or otherwise can take away the management or the property as that would virtually tantamount to illegal interference in the management and illegal usurpation of its properties. It is not open to the beneficiaries even by majority to change the nature of the Church, its property and management. The only method to change management is to amend the Constitution of 1934 in accordance with law. It is not open to the Parish Churches to even frame bye-laws in violation of the provisions of the 1934 Constitution. (xxvi) The 1934 Constitution is appropriate and adequate for management of the Parish Churches, as such there is no necessity of framing a scheme under section 92 of the CPC." Puthencruz Society Group Constitution: "(xxiv) The formation of 2002 Constitution is the result of illegal and void exercise. It cannot be recognized and the parallel system created thereunder for administration of Parish Churches of Malankara Church cannot hold the field. It has to be administered under the 1934 Constitution." Shared Services: "(xxvii) The plea that in face of the prevailing dissension between the two factions and the remote possibility of reconciliation, the religious services may be permitted to be conducted by two Vicars of each faith cannot be accepted as that would amount to patronizing parallel systems of administration."
"Rule of Law should prevail in India and Supreme Court final judgements should be respected by all State Governments including Kerala:" For quick info, Refer KZread Videos: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d66nvMiMYM6nY8o.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/aY2d3NugYJSth8Y.html, kzread.info/dash/bejne/a4ps1LmxksKuk7w.html For Truth of the Church Case, Refer to Supreme Court Latest Order of 06 Sep 2019 and Final Judgement of 03 Jul 2017 (Especially last few pages) in the Representative Suit. Any layman can understand the clear instructions / order of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Order and Judgement Links: main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2013/32130/32130_2013_Order_03-Jul-2017.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/2609/2609_2019_Order_15-Feb-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/11346/11346_2019_Order_08-Apr-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/16323/16323_2019_4_22_14633_Order_02-Jul-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/22350/22350_2019_4_6_16498_Judgement_06-Sep-2019.pdf main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/31451/31451_2019_3_15_18255_Order_18-Nov-2019.pdf It can be seen that all issues were clearly addressed in the Hon. Supreme Court Judgement with absolute clarity in favour of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, India. Basic thing is Puthencruz Society Group/ Patriarch faction of Bishops and Priests (Claims as Jacobite ) needs to accept their continued defeat in the cases and inform real truth to the innocent followers. They should accept the reality and refrain from creating law and order situations through emotions instigations: by establishing Parallel Administrations and grab power for their existence (Money, Power) against the Supreme Court Order. At the same time every judgement implementation depends on Executive will to implement final Judiciary Judgements to ensure rule of law. Relevant Quotes from Supreme Court Order of 2019 Page 1 - 7: " 2. ............ This Court has passed several judgments and orders to the effect that no such interference can be made by any court after the decision has been rendered by this Court in a representative suit which is binding on all concerned and it is the constitutional duty of all concerned to obey the judgment and order of this Court. As per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law declared by this Court is binding on all courts and under Article 144, civil and judicial authorities within the territory of India shall act in aid of Supreme Court. Kerala being Indian Territory all concerned are bound to act accordingly. We have intended peace to come in Church but due to such orders passed in contravention of law laid down by this Court law can never be obeyed. This amount to a violation of judgment and order. The High Court has passed an interim order in violation of the judgments and orders passed by this Court. We are not able to understand what kind of judicial discipline is reflected while passing the impugned order, which should not have been passed at all. We restrain all the Civil Courts and the High Court in Kerala not to pass any order in violation of the mandate of this Court's decision in K.S. Varghese (supra)." (supra). 3. The appeal arises out of the suit, pending before the High Court, is disposed of in terms of the decision passed by this Court in K.S. Varghese (supra) as there is no scope left for further litigation on the issue. The High Court has no right to tinker with the judgment and order passed by this Court which is binding and the judicial propriety has to be maintained at all costs. There is no scope for further litigation in the matter which we have concluded. We direct the Courts to decide all pending matters following the aforesaid decision which has been affirmed thereafter by umpteen number of times. 6. It is made clear to all concerned more so, to the Courts that in future the violation of judgment and order to be viewed seriously. Let similar matters which are pending be decided following aforesaid judgment and order. There can be no further litigation as the decision in representative suit is binding." Quotes from Supreme Court Final Judgement of 2017 Page 266-274: Catholicos & Malankara Metropolitan Power: "(v) The Primate of Orthodox Syrian Church of the East is Catholicos. He enjoys spiritual powers as well, as the Malankara Metropolitan. Malankara Metropolitan has the prime jurisdiction regarding temporal, ecclesiastical and spiritual administration of Malankara Church subject to the riders provided in the 1934 Constitution." Syrian Jacobite Patriarch Power: "(vi) Full effect has to be given to the finding that the spiritual power of the Patriarch has reached to a vanishing point. Consequently, he cannot interfere in the governance of Parish Churches by appointing Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. and thereby cannot create a parallel system of administration. The appointment has to be made as per the power conferred under the 1934 Constitution on the concerned Diocese, Metropolitan etc. (xix) The authority of Patriarch had never extended to the government of temporalities of the Churches. By questioning the action of the Patriarch and his undue interference in the administration of Churches in violation of the 1995 judgment, it cannot be said that the Catholicos faction is guilty of repudiating the spiritual supremacy of the Patriarch. The Patriarch faction is to be blamed for the situation which has been created post 1995 judgment. The property of the Church is to be managed as per the 1934 Constitution. The judgment of 1995 has not been respected by the Patriarch faction which was binding on all concerned. Filing of writ petitions in the High Court by the Catholicos faction was to deter the Patriarch/his representatives to appoint the Vicar etc. in violation of the 1995 judgment of this Court." Right of believer: "(vii) Though it is open to the individual member to leave a Church in exercise of the right not to be a member of any Association and as per Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Parish Assembly of the Church by majority or otherwise cannot decide to move church out of the Malankara Church. Once a trust, is always a trust. (viii) When the Church has been created and is for the benefit of the beneficiaries, it is not open for the beneficiaries, even by a majority, to usurp its property or management. The Malankara Church is in the form of a trust in which, its properties have vested. As per the 1934 Constitution, the Parishioners though may individually leave the Church, they are not permitted to take the movable or immovable properties out of the ambit of 1934 Constitution without the approval of the Church hierarchy." Vicar: "(xiv) Appointment of Vicar is a secular matter. There is no violation of any of the rights encompassed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India, if the appointment of Vicar, Priests, Deacons, Prelates (High Priests) etc. is made as per the 1934 Constitution. The Patriarch has no power to interfere in such matters under the guise of spiritual supremacy unless the 1934 Constitution is amended in accordance with law. The same is binding on all concerned." Church, its Properties and the Cemetry: "(xvii) The Church and the Cemetry cannot be confiscated by anybody. It has to remain with the Parishioners as per the customary rights and nobody can be deprived of the right to enjoy the same as a Parishioner in the Church or to be buried honourably in the cemetery, in case he continues to have faith in the Malankara Church. The property of the Malankara Church in which is also vested the property of the Parish Churches, would remain in trust as it has for the time immemorial for the sake of the beneficiaries and no one can claim to be owners thereof even by majority and usurp the Church and the properties. (xx) The 1934 Constitution is enforceable at present and the plea of its frustration or breach is not available to the Patriarch faction. Once there is Malankara Church, it has to remain as such including the property. No group or denomination by majority or otherwise can take away the management or the property as that would virtually tantamount to illegal interference in the management and illegal usurpation of its properties. It is not open to the beneficiaries even by majority to change the nature of the Church, its property and management. The only method to change management is to amend the Constitution of 1934 in accordance with law. It is not open to the Parish Churches to even frame bye-laws in violation of the provisions of the 1934 Constitution. (xxvi) The 1934 Constitution is appropriate and adequate for management of the Parish Churches, as such there is no necessity of framing a scheme under section 92 of the CPC." Puthencruz Society Group Constitution: "(xxiv) The formation of 2002 Constitution is the result of illegal and void exercise. It cannot be recognized and the parallel system created thereunder for administration of Parish Churches of Malankara Church cannot hold the field. It has to be administered under the 1934 Constitution." Shared Services: "(xxvii) The plea that in face of the prevailing dissension between the two factions and the remote possibility of reconciliation, the religious services may be permitted to be conducted by two Vicars of each faith cannot be accepted as that would amount to patronizing parallel systems of administration."
ഏന്താ കഥ! നാലാം തലമുറക്കാരൻ ജൊസഫ് മോർ ഗ്രിഗോറിയോസ് തിരുമേനി! അദ്ദേഹത്തിൻ്റെ കൈയ്യിൽ തിരുശേഷി പ്പുണ്ട് എന്ന്! അപ്പോൾ പരുമലയിലൊ! ഇവർ പരസ്പരം മൽസരിക്കയാണ്;
ഉപ്പിനൊളം വരുമോ ഉപ്പിലിട്ടത്.? പരുമല പള്ളി ഉള്ളപ്പോൾ മറ്റൊരു പള്ളി! പരുമല പള്ളിയിൽ ഏല്ലാവർക്കും പോകാം പ്രാർത്തിക്കാൻ അവസരം അവിടെ ഉണ്ട്.
പറഞ്ഞത് ശരി തന്നെ... athu പറയുമ്പോൾ ഒന്ന് ചിന്തിച്ചേ... സിറിയൻ ഓർത്തഡോൿസ് എന്നതിനോട് പകരം ആകുമോ ഇന്ത്യൻ ഓർത്തഡോൿസ് സിറിയൻ എന്നു പറയുന്നത്...
Shri.കെ.പി.യോഹന്നാൻ മെത്രാൻ അത്താനാസിയൊസ് ആയി 'എന്താ വേഷം!. മുടി നീട്ടി- യു ഹാനൊൻ മോർ അത്താനാസിയോസ് എന്ന പേരും.കല്യാണം കഴിച്ചു കുട്ടികളും ഉണ്ട് ' നല്ല കാശുണ്ട്.
Ippon oan njammante aala ...
Wish we the common man of India could raise our voice against the foolish decisions and actions taken by the hot-headed, biased Supreme Court judges. We are now ashamed of the ones highly respected Supreme Court.
A humble request to the followers. Please open your Bible and read; at least the 4 Gospels. Jesus have mercy! Open their eyes to see you.
parumala therumaneyuda kaber ullapoll aerenkellom therushasheypa nokuvoo thirumaney
parumala vanna seminary palleykall Thomas 1 qurbana cholleytta undo
His crown was from the heaven give by the God he is sitting in throne of Peter which right was give by Jesus when Peter say to Jesus you're son of God👑👑👑
Save us.
except Jesus no one deserve greatness.
that crown worn is anti crist.because he receive great importance than Jesus.
The crown is eternal and moran got from heaven and the crown will be remain forever 🙏🙏🙏
why do cristians give great importants to a man? why do crowd shouted at him? then who is great a man or Jesus ? Acts 4-12.Jesus is the maddiastan, the God then whoelse ?
he is the representative o our christ why do hindu give importance to sai baba whydo muslims give importance to tipu
He is syrian christians holy father.. we won't pray to him but we are respecting and faith full to him than any priest who living in this world ...
Why did cristians great importans to a man? why do believers shout at him , whether he is God ? quite unfortunate it is adegradation of cristianity.cristians must think in sense . Acts 4-12.
u cant understand
Acts 4 te 12.All dies except Jesus(God) How a dead man save and pray for us
Ramachandran T settan bible motham vayikku marichu 3am nal uyarthu karthav
edited....speech is edited :(
Where can I get this song: christhuvin aayi thirusabha il ?
First, stop this nonsense, think we are under Christ, our mother is our mother India is our mother, He Moran is always our leader/ Father of the Church, who made it Catholics from India. So learn and understand more not lessons from blinds both together go to hole.😂😂❤❤❤
Very good service. I would like to see more disipline in a church. It is not a political convention. How do we control a croud in India?. People should be educated to control their imotions atleast in a church service.
George Cherian True...
George Cherian Also people acting like a celebrity coming or forcing each other to touch him..
is he the one having all authority in heaven and earth?