Christianity dosnt really have a worldview but simply some jammed up beliefs and dogmas derived from other religions and civilizations before it...
@momdad53683 ай бұрын
I think we must watch the same utube channels, Patrick.
@leahunverferth82473 ай бұрын
Fantastic interview. Just ordered the book
@momdad53683 ай бұрын
Sound keeps going out.
@principled.not.pragmatic4 ай бұрын
Oppression , power, slavery..... Thank you mr. Marxist.
@DD-sz8nw4 ай бұрын
Did Bonhoeffer believe that Jesus was God come in the body of a Man? Did he believe in the literal Resurrection of Jesus from the tomb?
@ddcll95384 ай бұрын
I just love having to interact with my phone every 5-7 minutes to skip an ad, otherwise I will be punished with even more ads that if I don't skip them would take up more time than the actual video content itself.
@shannonglasford91754 ай бұрын
I'm commenting here because you're not allowing comments in the Sola Scriptura debate. I'm surprised Mr. White is still debating this subject after being thoroughly defeated by Patrick Madrid many years ago: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fqCAztx9cqvOmKQ.htmlsi=wAwmlNhu5KkSaI8e
@porschedk4 ай бұрын
He devil disguises as an angel of light...and also misuses the Bible to deceive people
@frederickanderson18604 ай бұрын
Is it evil to hate sin
@frederickanderson18604 ай бұрын
Running out of isms such is theological debates
@qwerty-so6ml4 ай бұрын
Only one Gospel: The Gospel of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.
@user-tf7yq7jq3q4 ай бұрын
$10 Keith is gay.
@Erik_Danley4 ай бұрын
6 genders huh? Check the nutjob narrative. The claim is there are many many more than 6. Nice try Keith. And a challenge I’d like to see presented to these progressive Christian (supposed) wokesters is to ask if it’d be just as acceptable that instead of Adam and Eve, the first humans were Adam and Steve. Yup I’m sure
@noahcole68564 ай бұрын
Hello
@Davis_Carlton4 ай бұрын
I wrote a multi-part response which is still available on Faith & Heritage which deunks McDurmon's spurious claims.
@friendlyolbum5 ай бұрын
Looking forward to how White will defend to truth in this. Should be a piece of cake.
@friendlyolbum5 ай бұрын
Oh this is worse than I thought.
@KnowItsTrue5 ай бұрын
1:36:58 Still waiting on that debate.
@TuggyBear75 ай бұрын
James at the end of was correct on Giles comment “weird) on Giles understanding and twisting marriage and gender identity, not helping the LGBT community. We need to speak the truth in love on this serious sin issue. Secondly 6 genders James was right on helping Keith on be careful what you watch on the internet And agree we were deceived on wearing masks , praying for Keith on his unbelievable reading into holy scriptures with horrible hermeneutics if you can even call that .
@leahunverferth82475 ай бұрын
Jason’s opening shows he doesn’t understand what the actual issue is in this debate (which is the case for most presuppositionatlists). They argue it’s a consequence of total depravity which is false - total depravity never removes the ability of man to understand logical progression. In order for the presuppositionalists' objections to be true they actually have to assume general revelation and the use of reason do not point to the one true and living God (hence the charge of deism) ironically subtly denying general revelation and validating man’s sinful use of reason apart from God. We present God’s truth *not* in order to give them the option to reject it (which would be a sinful putting of God on trial like Eve did) but in order to tear down their excuses and show that accepting God’s truth is the only logical and reasonable thing to do. They are capable of reasoning in this way otherwise speaking to them (which assumes they’re capable of reason) would be pointless though we know morally they are incapable of believing this truth without the Holy Spirit. YES, we want me to *judge* God’s truth as truth because they can’t be saved without holding this judgment for themselves. The idea that classical apologetics stood behind the first sin is so utterly absurd. Does he really believe Eve was using reason *rightly* by considering the serpent’s words over God’s? Of course she was not. And so classical apologetics would actually correct such thinking pointing out God created and provided every need for you Eve, do you really think this serpent has your best interest at heart? It is *irrational* for you to listen to him. And classical apologetics would move us itself beyond classical apologetics to point out the simple truth that duty and love to God demand that you obey him. It doesn’t deny that the Christian must have God’s Word as foundational, it simply allows for other rational arguments in support of it to give even greater weight and even further press biblical duty. Lesser motivations are still valid motivations. And in fact in evangelizing to those who don’t know the Bible, it’s absolutely vital to give extra biblical motivations to begin with then move into Scripture and the gospel - exactly as Paul did in Acts 17. Presuppositionalists cut off their own legs by denying this. It's a shame Eric rejects Calvinism and he's also wrong about its implications, sadly. But he did a good job otherwise.
@opinionbrewing74686 ай бұрын
I’ll debate Keith against nothing but his own words! He’s back and forth, falling all over his own points! Stop and think about what you’re saying! To support the world view, his view, would end Christianity in a single generation.
@davidmichael51537 ай бұрын
Giles... is stomach bile. Bad bad theology
@anthonycostello60557 ай бұрын
Giles is the poster boy for informal logical fallacies.
@anthonycostello60557 ай бұрын
Keith Giles hersey is? Marcionism!
@markp18458 ай бұрын
When Dr. White asks the question of what Paul was saying about those who practice homosexuality Mr. Giles begins with some disingenuous word redefinitions. He starts with the statement that the word homosexual did not appear in English translations of the Bible until 1946. That is technically correct but the word was not even developed until 1892. What was the word used before? It was sodomite, the noun form of sodomy. What was sodomy? According to Etymology online it means, "unnatural sexual relations," such as those customs imputed to the inhabitants of Biblical Sodom, especially between men but also with beasts, from Old French sodomie. Compare Late Latin peccatum Sodomiticum "anal sex," literally "the sin of Sodom," Mr. Giles then says that the word arsenokoitēs was described as temple prostitution. And that this is what Matthew Henry described it as. That is a false statement. Matthew Henry said that it meant sodomite. (Here in 1 Corinthians 6:9 the KJV uses the phrase abusers of themselves with mankind. There is no mention of temple prostitution.) The word appears only in two places the other being 1 Timothy 1:10 where the KJV uses the phrase “them that defile themselves with mankind”. Abuse and defile are strong words and it could indicate lying with a male prostitute but that is not mentioned in either place indicating that Mr. Giles has to read that into the accounts. This is the tactic of many that want to justify the sin of homosexuality and let us just plainly say that they are liars.
@ericcasey75938 ай бұрын
45:25 is brilliant.
@Burberryharry9 ай бұрын
Sola scripture unfolding before our eyes
@shaggytheshaman9 ай бұрын
Christians seem to think that condescendingly over pro-nounc-ing three syll-a-ble words is the same thing as making a good point.
@saulgoo23349 ай бұрын
James White couldn’t even say slavery was wrong. That’s how you turn scripture into an idol and choose to look into your suffering neighbors face and check the Bible before you serve them. Disgraceful.
@jayjonah8310 ай бұрын
The confidence Eric displays in his stupidity, the arrogance in his ignorance is absolutely amazing. He seems to go out of his way to be contrary and to misunderstand questions and concepts.
@PrenticeBoy168810 ай бұрын
'It's impossible to *other* a group of people...'. I don't believe I've ever heard the word 'other' used as a verb before.
@gowdsake710310 ай бұрын
The soul is the result of stone age ignorance of AIR
@joshe928611 ай бұрын
Few things in the modern church can sadden me quite like churches bearing the name of Luther having an abhorrently low view of scripture.
@friendlyfire7509 Жыл бұрын
Mr. Giles is an outstanding candidate for the papacy.
@jasonr.8822 Жыл бұрын
Always love Carrier debates, so well done.
@andreatimmers1720 Жыл бұрын
What is Giles talking about? Rambling on about nothing
@andreatimmers1720 Жыл бұрын
Dr James White I could listen to him for hours!! Brilliant man and warrior for God
@mariankeller5852 Жыл бұрын
MARRIAGE is a SACRED UNION BETWEEN A BIOLOGICAL MAN AND WOMAN....its a union SANCTIFIED BY GOD..there is no where in SCRIPTURE that states marriage is a union or right of homosexuals..transgender or same sex partners..on the Contr6..JESUS tells us in 1 Corinthians 6: 9-11..those who practice or participate in lawlessness ..pedophilia.. deviant behavior...adultery..etc..will NEVER inherit the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN but will be cast into everlasting Hellfires..
@SgtPwnVids Жыл бұрын
1:06 carrier says that being happy isnt a moral imperative. What would he say about “making effort towards being happy” being one?
@Hamann9631 Жыл бұрын
James shouldn't have equated Darwinism with the redefining of marriage. Real science shows no ability for 2 women or 2 men to make the next generation.
@Hamann9631 Жыл бұрын
Keith Giles: If arsen acoita (the Greek word translated as "homosexual", "effeminate", or "abusers of themselves with mankind") certainly means temple prostitutes, why isn't the word for "temple" or "prostitute" used in the compound word? I see no basis for the claim the it means temple prostitute.
@Hamann9631 Жыл бұрын
Giles was being ridiculous when he cited scriptures about people of all races being accepted, then he tried to equate that to sinful behaviors. Race isn't a behavior.
@Hamann9631 Жыл бұрын
So there are 15 words in ancient Greek which mean homosexual? What if Paul didn't use them because they were vulgar?
@deniseadkins2901 Жыл бұрын
"I'll email it to you..." belongs no where in a debate. By the way, First Lutheran Huston, if you agree with 95% of your chat then you need to repent and close down your church. If not, thanks for this debate.
@ginoorcullo2052 Жыл бұрын
This is a good topic to listen to. I wished the audio was mixed better because everytime the ads plays, the volume blasts my ear drums
@Levij83 Жыл бұрын
I think it’s really evident once cross examination begins that Giles bit off far more than he could chew. Man, this was painful to watch.
@BrianOxleyTexan Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Texasguy316 Жыл бұрын
Can we all just admit, this other guy Giles or whatever. Is a lost soul. Good grief, how sad.
@dorryshaddock5330 Жыл бұрын
No sound?
@Bane_questionmark Жыл бұрын
What he says about eunuchs is disgusting. He mentions that they were not considered men like that's such a great thing. The reality is that they were seen as *less than* men because their genitals were disfigured, either deformed or due to physical injury. This is worldly and materialistic, progressives love to call things "dehumanizing" but this is an actual example of dehumanization and he celebrates it. I reject this wholeheartedly as a Christian, God made them men and they are not any less of a man because they are deformed, were injured, or were mutilated.
@holinessofthebride1935 Жыл бұрын
Yes. I would be on par with saying we are not really human if we were missing an arm or a leg, or were mentally disabled. But we are. We are simply an injured human.
Пікірлер
Christianity dosnt really have a worldview but simply some jammed up beliefs and dogmas derived from other religions and civilizations before it...
I think we must watch the same utube channels, Patrick.
Fantastic interview. Just ordered the book
Sound keeps going out.
Oppression , power, slavery..... Thank you mr. Marxist.
Did Bonhoeffer believe that Jesus was God come in the body of a Man? Did he believe in the literal Resurrection of Jesus from the tomb?
I just love having to interact with my phone every 5-7 minutes to skip an ad, otherwise I will be punished with even more ads that if I don't skip them would take up more time than the actual video content itself.
I'm commenting here because you're not allowing comments in the Sola Scriptura debate. I'm surprised Mr. White is still debating this subject after being thoroughly defeated by Patrick Madrid many years ago: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fqCAztx9cqvOmKQ.htmlsi=wAwmlNhu5KkSaI8e
He devil disguises as an angel of light...and also misuses the Bible to deceive people
Is it evil to hate sin
Running out of isms such is theological debates
Only one Gospel: The Gospel of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.
$10 Keith is gay.
6 genders huh? Check the nutjob narrative. The claim is there are many many more than 6. Nice try Keith. And a challenge I’d like to see presented to these progressive Christian (supposed) wokesters is to ask if it’d be just as acceptable that instead of Adam and Eve, the first humans were Adam and Steve. Yup I’m sure
Hello
I wrote a multi-part response which is still available on Faith & Heritage which deunks McDurmon's spurious claims.
Looking forward to how White will defend to truth in this. Should be a piece of cake.
Oh this is worse than I thought.
1:36:58 Still waiting on that debate.
James at the end of was correct on Giles comment “weird) on Giles understanding and twisting marriage and gender identity, not helping the LGBT community. We need to speak the truth in love on this serious sin issue. Secondly 6 genders James was right on helping Keith on be careful what you watch on the internet And agree we were deceived on wearing masks , praying for Keith on his unbelievable reading into holy scriptures with horrible hermeneutics if you can even call that .
Jason’s opening shows he doesn’t understand what the actual issue is in this debate (which is the case for most presuppositionatlists). They argue it’s a consequence of total depravity which is false - total depravity never removes the ability of man to understand logical progression. In order for the presuppositionalists' objections to be true they actually have to assume general revelation and the use of reason do not point to the one true and living God (hence the charge of deism) ironically subtly denying general revelation and validating man’s sinful use of reason apart from God. We present God’s truth *not* in order to give them the option to reject it (which would be a sinful putting of God on trial like Eve did) but in order to tear down their excuses and show that accepting God’s truth is the only logical and reasonable thing to do. They are capable of reasoning in this way otherwise speaking to them (which assumes they’re capable of reason) would be pointless though we know morally they are incapable of believing this truth without the Holy Spirit. YES, we want me to *judge* God’s truth as truth because they can’t be saved without holding this judgment for themselves. The idea that classical apologetics stood behind the first sin is so utterly absurd. Does he really believe Eve was using reason *rightly* by considering the serpent’s words over God’s? Of course she was not. And so classical apologetics would actually correct such thinking pointing out God created and provided every need for you Eve, do you really think this serpent has your best interest at heart? It is *irrational* for you to listen to him. And classical apologetics would move us itself beyond classical apologetics to point out the simple truth that duty and love to God demand that you obey him. It doesn’t deny that the Christian must have God’s Word as foundational, it simply allows for other rational arguments in support of it to give even greater weight and even further press biblical duty. Lesser motivations are still valid motivations. And in fact in evangelizing to those who don’t know the Bible, it’s absolutely vital to give extra biblical motivations to begin with then move into Scripture and the gospel - exactly as Paul did in Acts 17. Presuppositionalists cut off their own legs by denying this. It's a shame Eric rejects Calvinism and he's also wrong about its implications, sadly. But he did a good job otherwise.
I’ll debate Keith against nothing but his own words! He’s back and forth, falling all over his own points! Stop and think about what you’re saying! To support the world view, his view, would end Christianity in a single generation.
Giles... is stomach bile. Bad bad theology
Giles is the poster boy for informal logical fallacies.
Keith Giles hersey is? Marcionism!
When Dr. White asks the question of what Paul was saying about those who practice homosexuality Mr. Giles begins with some disingenuous word redefinitions. He starts with the statement that the word homosexual did not appear in English translations of the Bible until 1946. That is technically correct but the word was not even developed until 1892. What was the word used before? It was sodomite, the noun form of sodomy. What was sodomy? According to Etymology online it means, "unnatural sexual relations," such as those customs imputed to the inhabitants of Biblical Sodom, especially between men but also with beasts, from Old French sodomie. Compare Late Latin peccatum Sodomiticum "anal sex," literally "the sin of Sodom," Mr. Giles then says that the word arsenokoitēs was described as temple prostitution. And that this is what Matthew Henry described it as. That is a false statement. Matthew Henry said that it meant sodomite. (Here in 1 Corinthians 6:9 the KJV uses the phrase abusers of themselves with mankind. There is no mention of temple prostitution.) The word appears only in two places the other being 1 Timothy 1:10 where the KJV uses the phrase “them that defile themselves with mankind”. Abuse and defile are strong words and it could indicate lying with a male prostitute but that is not mentioned in either place indicating that Mr. Giles has to read that into the accounts. This is the tactic of many that want to justify the sin of homosexuality and let us just plainly say that they are liars.
45:25 is brilliant.
Sola scripture unfolding before our eyes
Christians seem to think that condescendingly over pro-nounc-ing three syll-a-ble words is the same thing as making a good point.
James White couldn’t even say slavery was wrong. That’s how you turn scripture into an idol and choose to look into your suffering neighbors face and check the Bible before you serve them. Disgraceful.
The confidence Eric displays in his stupidity, the arrogance in his ignorance is absolutely amazing. He seems to go out of his way to be contrary and to misunderstand questions and concepts.
'It's impossible to *other* a group of people...'. I don't believe I've ever heard the word 'other' used as a verb before.
The soul is the result of stone age ignorance of AIR
Few things in the modern church can sadden me quite like churches bearing the name of Luther having an abhorrently low view of scripture.
Mr. Giles is an outstanding candidate for the papacy.
Always love Carrier debates, so well done.
What is Giles talking about? Rambling on about nothing
Dr James White I could listen to him for hours!! Brilliant man and warrior for God
MARRIAGE is a SACRED UNION BETWEEN A BIOLOGICAL MAN AND WOMAN....its a union SANCTIFIED BY GOD..there is no where in SCRIPTURE that states marriage is a union or right of homosexuals..transgender or same sex partners..on the Contr6..JESUS tells us in 1 Corinthians 6: 9-11..those who practice or participate in lawlessness ..pedophilia.. deviant behavior...adultery..etc..will NEVER inherit the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN but will be cast into everlasting Hellfires..
1:06 carrier says that being happy isnt a moral imperative. What would he say about “making effort towards being happy” being one?
James shouldn't have equated Darwinism with the redefining of marriage. Real science shows no ability for 2 women or 2 men to make the next generation.
Keith Giles: If arsen acoita (the Greek word translated as "homosexual", "effeminate", or "abusers of themselves with mankind") certainly means temple prostitutes, why isn't the word for "temple" or "prostitute" used in the compound word? I see no basis for the claim the it means temple prostitute.
Giles was being ridiculous when he cited scriptures about people of all races being accepted, then he tried to equate that to sinful behaviors. Race isn't a behavior.
So there are 15 words in ancient Greek which mean homosexual? What if Paul didn't use them because they were vulgar?
"I'll email it to you..." belongs no where in a debate. By the way, First Lutheran Huston, if you agree with 95% of your chat then you need to repent and close down your church. If not, thanks for this debate.
This is a good topic to listen to. I wished the audio was mixed better because everytime the ads plays, the volume blasts my ear drums
I think it’s really evident once cross examination begins that Giles bit off far more than he could chew. Man, this was painful to watch.
Thank you
Can we all just admit, this other guy Giles or whatever. Is a lost soul. Good grief, how sad.
No sound?
What he says about eunuchs is disgusting. He mentions that they were not considered men like that's such a great thing. The reality is that they were seen as *less than* men because their genitals were disfigured, either deformed or due to physical injury. This is worldly and materialistic, progressives love to call things "dehumanizing" but this is an actual example of dehumanization and he celebrates it. I reject this wholeheartedly as a Christian, God made them men and they are not any less of a man because they are deformed, were injured, or were mutilated.
Yes. I would be on par with saying we are not really human if we were missing an arm or a leg, or were mentally disabled. But we are. We are simply an injured human.