AI is everywhere. Every walk of life is adding an element of AI into their workflow. Every business, every app, everything everywhere. But is AI any good, and do we need to be worried about it?
These were the questions I had in mind when I started the channel. All I see is that AI is going to take everyone's job, and will be the future, but, I think AI has a long long way to go before we are in that position.
Through a tool, I am creating fully generated AI videos. The facts are checked, so the information is accurate (if not debate-able depending on which side of the argument you sit on) but not fabricated in some AI electric-sheep dream. The images/voices/scene length/direction etc however is all determined by AI.
When videos here are posted and people can not tell they are AI, that is when I believe we need to worry!
Welcome to my Canary in the coal mine.
History being made, on history, by history for future generations to track AI progression.
Пікірлер
Have the Greeks ever won a war?
These images are garbage and the script is terrible. Another pointless channel in the age of endless content that lacks any substance.
YOU MAY TAKE MY LIFE, BUT YOU CAN NEVER TAKE MY FREEDOM!
You've really been churning out the videos. I watched a bunch of them. They were anywhere from kinda too vague to OK. I just watched this one, this is by far the best. Yeah it's not perfect by any means but AI can work well.🙂
Every time I hear the narrator say "Custer underestimated the size of the Indian camp" I know this person had done zero research- For months leading up to the Battle Newspapers were running quote from Sitting Bull " I have 8000 warriors and if the army comes near me we will fight " days before the battle - indian camp sights were abandoned where there were 800 plus fires lit - Custer had zero respect for the Indians and knew exactly how big that camp was - Custer had 80 staghounds that's right 80 and has them black Velveteen uniform custom made as he leaves his widow the debt of 8000 dollars to deal with ----
What a mess! Horses with no heads, two heads, two bums, bendy rubber legs, riders mounted backwards, bows that suddenly end at the hand grip... How bad can it get? Only AI could get it THIS wrong.
Bla bla bla,where were the chivalry that were the moral obligation of this Time,you English were the first too make people not worthy of being considered as equal, stop this boolshit
There’s nothing I hate more then AI history content
Did you know that in the US, AI garbage like this cannot be copyrighted, so you can download and re-sell them to other AI-loving fools?
Only if you can prove no human was involved in the creation. The images themselves are probably fairgame, but when they are collated into video format it becomes slightly "murkier" from a legal perspective. However, you have my full permission to sell this on if you fancy!
Biden no.😊
Why A.I.? So we can not only have imaginary kings features but also people in top hats in the 10th century (min. 4.20 to 4.25) ? Have we run out of talented artists? Experts for historical authenticity? This is going all wrong, and we are shoveling away like moles...Yes, the graveyard of human culture. Watched to the end, it is getting worse and worse. Even those Monarchs we have portraits of are nilly willy popped together, like a child paints a sun or person. On top of all of that: wrong armour, wrong clothes and costumes, wrong depicted age assumption. I beg you: STOP!
日本人から見て画像とか凄く違和感あります。特に衣装や甲冑や髪型なんかは、偽物です。
WTF- was that!? This is dry monologue with pictures that portray absolutely nothing about this battle correctly.
OMGOODNESS , this really BIT MY AZZ ! near ALL yu stated is iether common knowledge {common mistakes} or just plain STUNODITY ! the indians got LUCKY !all that jazz bout NAPOLEANS IN WESTERN AMERICA {craz horse or sat in bull} NOPE not close , the only tactic used by indians in general NOT l.b.h stuff but the bait and switch had been used at very least time wise was before or at using horses in larger numbers than previous , NADDA BIG DEAL at ALL !
That was pretty dreadful in terms of any accurate portrayal of the parties involved or their numbers.
Doesn't that happen now? 🤔
History just repeats itself. Always and forever.
The pictures in this video are a little weird. There are parts of it that are a bit like China. From a Japanese perspective, this is a really strange picture.
The AI sucked... Try again.
NO NO PLEASE DONT ! me head cant take another DOSE OF THIS CLAPTRACK ! bed of nails is prefferable!
Hey bro which software do you use
It's called Flickify- does the script, images, music etc
First
I am from Carthage tunis
Good video that shot past a lot of info. You did well to get it all in but needs follow ups to explain each part. Nice.
Not even close
well that was utter crap.
Goodness. If this is the way AI interprets Custer's Last Stand, we ordinary humans have nothing to worry about.
I cant get my head around how Napoleon was allowed to escape
Battle of Little Big Horn and the situation with the "Native Americans"....from a Brit............... Great, then we should have Bubba from Arkansas, go into the history and social background to the battle of ISANDLUWANA......................... "Well see here, ...............these tea drinking, crumpet eating, limey's were trying to force their will on the noble ZULU".. The Zulu kicked their buts real good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cheers!!!!!!!!!!1 Carry On! IIll be back with another brilliant, history lesson about Shilo!! Pip, Pip.............................🤮
AI? OK! For the older monarchs, one can accept a mock-up photograph. But modern monarchs who have been photographed extensively were portrayed very badly. The bearded Edward VII and his son George V are unrecognizable clean-shaven men. Edward VIII was a young man when he abdicated but shown older. George VI does not resemble the man. And who designed that stupid headgear for King Charles III? AI... drop the "I" from your name. You do not deserve to be called "Intelligent!"
And now they are giving it all away to Trump. All hail the new king!
Ok AI, but is there some kind of reseach about the true features of the different sovraigns? Having in mind the most known portraits, coins or written sources, I should say no, just suggestive, imaginative drawings without any historical ground. At least for the most ancient rulers...🤔
Its the same today, nothing has changed.
Wow thats crap