Пікірлер

• 
  @SombreHistoireYT4 күн бұрын

  Bonjour ! Étant actuellement en train de réaliser une vidéo documentaire sur le Surcouf, j'aurais aimé connaitre la personne qui a réalisée cette animation 3D, peut-être vous même ? J'aimerais échanger avec cette personne pour voir si il serait possible d'obtenir une version haute résolution de cette animation. Et je suis, bien entendu, prêt à donner une rémunération contre ce service. En vous remerciant, belle journée à vous !

• 
  @bernardhuc58284 күн бұрын

  Bonjour, j'ai fait cette vidéo en 2003. Qu'entendez-vous par haute résolution. Que me proposez-vous ? Bernard Huc

• 
  @SombreHistoireYT4 күн бұрын

  @@bernardhuc5828 Merci de votre retour rapide. Ah oui, 2003 cela commence à faire loin, en effet ! Ce type d'animation 3D serait idéal pour présenter le sous-marin, son hangar à hydravion, et notamment la manière avec laquelle pivote sa tourelle ainsi que le télémètre. Le principal problème est la résolution de la vidéo, qui est de seulement 360p, trop faible pour un rendu satisfaisant (trop pixellisé). Si jamais il vous serait possible de refaire un rendu de cette animation, avec une résolution Haute Définition d'au moins 1080p, dans ce cas je serais fortement intéressé.

• 
  @Roman-hx3qjАй бұрын

  Bernard, is this 3D digital file the base for the figures being sold by ANCRE at 1/48, 1/36 and 1/24 scales?

• 
  @bernardhuc5828Ай бұрын

  no, the ANCRE model has a more twisted body. Mine is more in line with reality. You can see it here: www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/3d-model-carpenter-1700-1800-2095966

• 
  @Roman-hx3qjАй бұрын

  @@bernardhuc5828 can these be obtained 3D printed or just the file?

• 
  @jaredcreel-sx6mz3 ай бұрын

  this needs missisipi queen

• 
  @Lux-Sphinkx4 ай бұрын

  Очень красиво ❤

• 
  @LargeBlueCircle4 ай бұрын

  such a shame this is ~10k feet below sea level. Oh and a tomb for all, what, 115 crew? Incredible piece of engineering. I wish it was a museum.

• 
  @sebastienpajot852304 ай бұрын

  superbe !!!

• 
  @stopredless84474 ай бұрын

  That fact it just disappeared without a trace makes this all the more better, because for all we know the turret could’ve just popped open and the guns were like a typical deck gun of a U-Boat 😂

• 
  @knightofavalon864 ай бұрын

  I feel like this is the closest real life is going to get to the SSV Normandy😊

• 
  @Redduck_XD4 ай бұрын

  Its the fuckin french technology again

• 
  @Shaun_Jones4 ай бұрын

  The aft deck also concealed a pair of swiveling torpedo launchers.

• 
  @cactusdu67f4 ай бұрын

  Its all fun until you discover that it can launch a plane !

• 
  @blyatpotato94845 ай бұрын

  So the actual angel of the cannon is capable of firing is limited by how much the fire director can turn, what a design flaw but damn it looks cool

• 
  @HandleMyBallsYouTube5 ай бұрын

  Le Surcouf lore:

• 
  @user-pn5tn8sy4b5 ай бұрын

  ナチスに接収された後に日本に引き渡され「イ501」と呼ばれるようになる

• 
  @trainexplore21495 ай бұрын

  Wouldn’t that sink immediately as the turret terns?

• 
  @theca695 ай бұрын

  It’s supposed to fire its gun once surfaced, so i think it won’t sink it

• 
  @tssteelx5 ай бұрын

  Rumor has it that it is still out their saving french sailors from sea rations.

• 
  @trainenthusiast51995 ай бұрын

  oui oui french engineering is le best 😂

• 
  @azimus17765 ай бұрын

  Innovative, and a bit crazy - though not as crazy as the "aircraft carrier subs" of the same era.

• 
  @scifidino50225 ай бұрын

  Song tip for 200% additional enjoyment: kzread.info/dash/bejne/qZuCsqWEpbuflNY.html

• 
  @TristanMorrow5 ай бұрын

  Isn't this the one Hemingway sank with hand grenades and a tommy gun back when he was out "submarine hunting" on his Cuban fishing boat?

• 
  @shakal_5 ай бұрын

  everybody gangsta until french put 8 inch cannons on a submarine

• 
  @MBT605 ай бұрын

  Charles De Gaulle

• 
  @jonsmitt97695 ай бұрын

  I didn’t know the gun could rotate. I thought it was a casemate like a bunker. If the angle is too far I’d expect the recoil to roll the sub. A curious concept but advances in anti submarine tactics should have outpaced its construction so I’m puzzled why land power France would waste resources actually building it. It’d make more sense if the US, Britain or Germany had tinkered with this concept. The US and Britain ended up using large subs to smuggle supplies to besieged islands like Malta and the Philippines. As it turns out Surcoef was plagued with mechanical issues and/or the free French crew were considered so unreliable so it had a unhappy career being sent away from several assignments until it went missing.

• 
  @shipmasterkent91765 ай бұрын

  Ah yes, the original Alicorn

• 
  @longtsun82865 ай бұрын

  Well done.

• 
  @samnelson90385 ай бұрын

  One of those in concept ideas that would seem to be brilliant.

• 
  @vincentbeau42035 ай бұрын

  Merci de m'avoir fait découvrir cette curiosité française.

• 
  @JustAsPlanned15 ай бұрын

  Hello

• 
  @IdiotfromNorway5 ай бұрын

  le fishe au metel

• 
  @nhatlamvo63075 ай бұрын

  I think this is from the inspiration about the Japanese cuz they made a subcarrier (a submarine that can carry planes)

• 
  @EireIkkiForoyar5 ай бұрын

  When, War Thunder?

• 
  @abdoulakehal47464 ай бұрын

  It was in Mobile War Thunder but it was in the event and you can't get it anymore

• 
  @hiro-ox6vi5 ай бұрын

  測距儀其処に付いてたのか

• 
  @rodiculous94645 ай бұрын

  The thing on top looks like a detachable mini sub until you see the turret turning

• 
  @Galejro5 ай бұрын

  ... Pointless idea IMO, submarine is there to not be seem, to act coverlty and avoid detection. The only reason early subs had a gun turret was because it was a better alternative to an expensive torpedo to take down a merchant ship that already surrendered. Mechant vessels werent armored so even a crappy gun turret could penetrate it. That plus a submarine itself is not armored, water is it's armor, just go 20 feet under and you're safe, it has no need to engage a superior armed vessel with a cannon if it can just torp it from beneath. Early subs are economy weapons, they're not even built or meant to engage enemy military but mercantile vessels, it's cargo you're after not munitions.

• 
  @shrouddreamer5 ай бұрын

  It's easy to write this with today's knowledge. But you don't know what works out if you don't try it. The eventual role of early submarines was not clear during WW1. They were even almost ignored in the beginning, thought of as a simple toy that wouldn't accomplish much. This thinking was changed when the German submarine SM U-9 sunk three British Cruisers on 22 September 1914 in less than an hour, which was more or less a traditional naval engagement. As early torpedoes were expensive and unreliable (about your "just torp it from beneath"...), several navies tried to design submarine cruisers like the one depicted here, including the Royal Navy and the German Imperial Navy. Again, it wasn't clear that submarines of the time would be unsuited for fleet support. Submarines really were well protected by diving during WW1 (although they'd need to get much deeper than just 20 feet!), but that meant they were also unable to attack, stuck below the surface with barely any battery capacity. So keeping on the surface was desirable. And finally, the main anti-submarine method of the time was the deployment of Q-ships, seemingly harmless merchants with secret armament, hoping to lure submarines towards the surface. Arming submarines with heavier guns could have made that less effective.

• 
  @Neurax-lx7ck5 ай бұрын

  and what about torpedo tubes?

• 
  @cynthiablackthorn5 ай бұрын

  Seeing this my brain went to space engineers and the water mod and using crains to swap weapon systems easily

• 
  @lone_grizzly13285 ай бұрын

  One. This is cool. Two: Wargaming probably will add this later on. Three: I want them to add the Japanese submarine carriers so frickin bad

• 
  @matthewkurniawan40815 ай бұрын

  World of warship player: write that down

• 
  @melee-dexterdexterious28785 ай бұрын

  Silencing and quieting that submarine must be nothing sort of grand and royal headache.. 😮

• 
  @k956upg5 ай бұрын

  It’s French so shouldn’t the turret be on the back so it can shoot while running away…& that flag isn’t it supposed to be white..

• 
  @teslashark5 ай бұрын

  It has rotating torpedo turrets too

• 
  @j-aaxch96585 ай бұрын

  Add the I-400 to this and bam you have the Alicorn

• 
  @g11operator5 ай бұрын

  Wonder where she went

• 
  @turinturambar50155 ай бұрын

  Ля Скуф

• 
  @SuperS055 ай бұрын

  What depth was it rated for? I'm curious how /if it kept the loader dry or if it was setup similar to the small deck guns more commonly used.

• 
  @uppbentertaiment46715 ай бұрын

  Sir is that UX 99? NEIN THATS FRENCH SUBMARINE

• 
  @khrystree92335 ай бұрын

  Brilliant design. More accurate than torpedoes and you carry more ammo . Formidable 👏

• 
  @Briselance5 ай бұрын

  Still had to surface to fire. Much less stealthy.

• 
  @Arandohistorian2025 ай бұрын

  Let me tell you a story… back when I was a gunnery officer

• 
  @InevitableD34th5 ай бұрын

  WG pls

• 
  @johnprice62715 ай бұрын

  I know this isn't a Japaneese sub, but I swear this looks like a cursed I-400, which is already cursed by design!