OVR Orbit +

OVR Orbit +

Underneath Mercury

Underneath Mercury

Terrifying Planets Beyond

Terrifying Planets Beyond

Gravity Is An Illusion

Gravity Is An Illusion

Voyager 1 Phone Home!

Voyager 1 Phone Home!

Пікірлер

  • @GA_MEA_DDICT
    @GA_MEA_DDICT16 күн бұрын

    When I go to p***n site it's direct me to this channel 🤦🏻 why so many pop let me watch something

  • @michaelkahn8744
    @michaelkahn874422 күн бұрын

    Gravity is not a force but the joint effect of "Curvature od Spacetime" and "Expansion of Universe". 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Gravity, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

  • @ishmielknight9191
    @ishmielknight919124 күн бұрын

    Ai generated video!!! This thumbnail screams china.

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus24 күн бұрын

    Thanks for your concern. But no robots were hurt in the making of this video lol. I assure you it's real people making this content! Thanks for checking us out!

  • @ishmielknight9191
    @ishmielknight919124 күн бұрын

    Be wary af AI GENERATED VIDEOS !!!

  • @Boballoo
    @Boballoo26 күн бұрын

    WTF!??? Nothing to do with gravity. It's all about Mercury. The voice bot is horrible.

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus26 күн бұрын

    It was our mistake. The wrong video was uploaded with the thumbnail. Sorry about that. Also it's not a bot lol. It's a real human.

  • @scottmoore4734
    @scottmoore473427 күн бұрын

    Kill the back ground music

  • @tgrigsby7
    @tgrigsby727 күн бұрын

    "The magma may have melted the planet's inside"? Seriously? Tell us, where do you suppose magma comes from? There are a number of basic mistakes like this throughout the video. Pro tip: Please learn the subject matter before you write the script for the voice bot, and use actual pictures more than generated CGI.

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    That's correct. Sulfur from the magma is presumed to have leaked into the core, lowering its melting point. Thanks for the pro tips. I'll let my robot friends know.

  • @erikdrews8598
    @erikdrews859827 күн бұрын

    Mer-kree. At least employ a voice bot whose first language is english.

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    I will let my robot friend know he isn't pronouncing Mercury properly. You know these things are made in Japan, after all. Thank you for your constructive feedback!

  • @ImTimT.
    @ImTimT.27 күн бұрын

    This is not the gravity video I am looking for

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    Thanks for feedback. We are striving to put out good, entertaining, educational space videos. We appreciate you checking out our channel and will work to improving with each video we do!

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    We made a mistake and uploaded the mercury video again by accident. Sorry about that.

  • @johnfitzgerald8879
    @johnfitzgerald887927 күн бұрын

    F=mg, Force is proportional to the product of mass x gravitational acceleration. g=G(M/r^2), gravitational acceleration is proportional to the mass and inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the mass. Combined, F=G(mM/r^2). These are describing an effect that we call gravity. I jumped up into the air and came back down again. I tossed a ball into the air and watched it fall. That's the effect and it's still happening. What part of that is an illusion?

  • @moladiver6817
    @moladiver681726 күн бұрын

    Ask Einstein. 😉

  • @Boballoo
    @Boballoo26 күн бұрын

    The ball is not falling. The Earth is rising.

  • @johnfitzgerald8879
    @johnfitzgerald887926 күн бұрын

    @@Boballoo Sure, if you are the ball.

  • @johnfitzgerald8879
    @johnfitzgerald887926 күн бұрын

    @@moladiver6817 Einstein made no claim to gravity being an illusion.

  • @moladiver6817
    @moladiver681726 күн бұрын

    @@johnfitzgerald8879If you study general relativity then that's the conclusion. Mass curves space and curved space makes mass move towards other mass. What we perceive as a force isn't a force but simply mass moving in a straight line inside curved space. Hence gravity isn't a real force. The only real force is the surface of the planet pushing you up at constant acceleration. On earth this force is defined as 1g. If you'd be in a rocket in space constantly accelerating at 1g you'd feel the exact same force and both situations would be undistinguishable if you don't look out the window. So either the rocket engine applies a force or the surface of the planet applies a force. The laws of relativity dictate that no simple experiment would allow you to tell the difference. Same when you're in free fall in a plane doing a hyperbolic flight path to simulate weightlessness. There you truly are weightless because in that hyperbole you're following a straight path through curved space. Same as when you would be flying out of the solar system like voyager going in its straight path. At that point there is no force. No force means no weight and you're just floating around. It's only when you either hit the ground or when the plane pulls up again you start to feel a force. Either from the engine or from the surface of the planet.

  • @acgolem
    @acgolem27 күн бұрын

    Merkery?

  • @acgolem
    @acgolem27 күн бұрын

    Inerestingly

  • @jswebbproductions9785
    @jswebbproductions978527 күн бұрын

    I made it 4 min. into the video and not one word about gravity.....

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    Thank you for your feedback. We appreciate it and will work to improve the quality of our content with each video we do!

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus27 күн бұрын

    So we made a mistake. We uploaded the mercury video again with the gravity thumb. Sorry about that.

  • @jswebbproductions9785
    @jswebbproductions978527 күн бұрын

    @@ovrorbitplus oh ok, good to know! Thanks for clearing that up!

  • @peace4myheart
    @peace4myheart28 күн бұрын

    This has nothing to do with gravity, a-hole.

  • @muffntheB
    @muffntheBАй бұрын

    facepalm emoji

  • @vandavang7
    @vandavang7Ай бұрын

    well, they tried.

  • @anikdasdigital
    @anikdasdigitalАй бұрын

    Your videos are amazing. I really like it. I am a new subscriber to your channel. Can I talk with you OVR Orbit?

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplusАй бұрын

    Thank you for your support and feedback! We appreciate it very much!

  • @anikdasdigital
    @anikdasdigitalАй бұрын

    @@ovrorbitplus thanks. Can i tlk to u?

  • @geewizz4414
    @geewizz4414Ай бұрын

    What has the Hadron Collider got to do with NASA?. Or do you just throw in a couple of red herrings to make your video more impressive? Some would think this is FAKE NEWS!

  • @MrBuddibaba
    @MrBuddibabaАй бұрын

    If NASA did find life on Mars, would they tell us?

  • @user-ow2kl9oz6e
    @user-ow2kl9oz6eАй бұрын

    Organic methane from Mars ocean core

  • @derekmckeown4478
    @derekmckeown4478Ай бұрын

    Can’t watch it with that background music

  • @user-zs7cc3ro2g
    @user-zs7cc3ro2gАй бұрын

    The background music is too loud

  • @markaston1995
    @markaston1995Ай бұрын

    What you been smoking. Great idea though lol

  • @courcheval
    @courchevalАй бұрын

    The sample return missions have been cancelled, since the american deep state prefer to finance civil wars (in Ukraine) than space exploration.

  • @TVSNOWOWL
    @TVSNOWOWLАй бұрын

    Nasa is militair dont trust them

  • @raystevens687
    @raystevens687Ай бұрын

    Here is an Idea I'm wondering if SpaceX could build a Delta Flyer and put it inside SpaceX largest rocket this delta flyer would have side rockets on each side of the flyer the would need 4 small rockets 🚀 under neath the front end and 2 more in the rear end. There be a lot of Engineering involved to make it work and a lot of ideas. And like I said it just an idea only.

  • @glenbentley3129
    @glenbentley3129Ай бұрын

    I have heard an interesting hypothesis that Mercury is actually just a core remnant of a much larger planet. I wonder how this idea complements that.

  • @reyvillegasjr166
    @reyvillegasjr166Ай бұрын

    Flying through space that's funny 😁😆🤣

  • @DrMJT
    @DrMJTАй бұрын

    Planets have a Lifespan. All start off as Gaseous... in various sizes. When the lighter gases 'leak' into space plus the expulsion of atmosphere into space with each Impact or an eruption / explosion on the solid surface. The Giant Red Spot is lower layers of the Atmosphere churned up to surface when a 'large Earth' sized planet enter the Gas Layers. In the far future, Jupiter will have lost all it's thick layers of gases and will be a 'large Earth' sized planet. Just as the Earth is currently loosing Atmosphere into Space... every second of every day. Earth also has had Burps. When the Dinosaurs roaming the surface the Atmospheric pressure was 80 to 100 Tor. A lot was vented with the 65mya impact. More recently, 12,800ya, the Hiawatha Impact in NW Greenland vented Atmospheric Pressure into Space. We went from 3 to 4 Tor to our current 1 Tor. Humans almost went extinct if the Tsar Bomb had been slightly Bigger. When there is an explosion on the surface greater than 50mt = creates an upwelling, updraft... vortex... like a straw from space down to the lower atmosphere. It is why there is no longer any Mega-Fauna on Earth. They can not get pregnant in our rarefied air - compared to what they evolved to exist. A human woman can get pregnant at 1tor but take her above ~5km, she can not get pregnant. She can give birth but No pregnancy. Earth is current form is on way to becoming Mars atmospheric pressure (when we loose our EM Field and if we do not put an artificial one in it's place in space to protect from the solar winds and cosmic radiation.) The next stage for a planet after Mars is Mercury... the Solidified Iron Core when all the Uranium and Plutonium inside has been exhausted. Oh, or it could end up another asteroid belt. The Atmospheric Pressure on Venus is the same as what was on Earth >65mya - just different gasses. It is why dinosaurs were Big... and why Pterodactyls and dragonflies with 1+m long wings could fly. No Jurassic Park could not exist today as the dinosaurs would suffocate. The only way would be a high pressure terrarium.

  • @melvillesequeira2485
    @melvillesequeira2485Ай бұрын

    Good job mate

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplusАй бұрын

    Thanks for you feedback and support! Much appreciated

  • @balipan09
    @balipan09Ай бұрын

    Planetestials?? C'mon maaaaaan

  • @kirk1147
    @kirk1147Ай бұрын

    Great job! You got everything right!

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplusАй бұрын

    Thanks so much for your feedback and support!

  • @anthonysaunders345
    @anthonysaunders345Ай бұрын

    You pronounced "leverage right"! Can you teach the Americans? They don't listen to we Canadians...

  • @IXTJ
    @IXTJАй бұрын

    *us Canadians...

  • @anthonysaunders345
    @anthonysaunders345Ай бұрын

    "We" is a subject pronoun, "us" an object pronoun. "Canadians" is the subject of the sentence, so "we" is correct. Learn your grammar kid, and don't correct people when they know of what they're speaking.

  • @IXTJ
    @IXTJАй бұрын

    @@anthonysaunders345 Incorrect. In the phrase "They don't listen to we Canadians," the group "we Canadians" is the object of the preposition "to." Therefore, the correct pronoun is "us," not "we."

  • @archtroll
    @archtrollАй бұрын

    would be mindblowing to find out venus had intelligent life way beforea earth and their industrialization led to the runaway greenhouse condition. but the density of the atmosphere, heat and wind over millions of years would have destroyed any trace of civilization one would imagine

  • @hunnitmanjuuve2404
    @hunnitmanjuuve2404Ай бұрын

    Good video! I just subscribed

  • @jerry5630
    @jerry5630Ай бұрын

    Enthusiastic ❤

  • @mohamadmusman5647
    @mohamadmusman5647Ай бұрын

    Who created Universe. Why Humanity is the only one. Why Earth is the only one. Why Mind Consciousness is the only one. Mind is the most only one mystery in Universe. Why only humankind can read and write in Mind then start to write on stone 20K-40K years ago. Then only humankind create civilization to read and write Universe journey of 13.8 billion years. But why civilization is just started 6000 years ago.

  • @Ted_Youtuber
    @Ted_Youtuber2 ай бұрын

    Finding life on other planets will be one of the most scariest and fascinating things to witness indeed!

  • @mathilda8925
    @mathilda89252 ай бұрын

    *promo sm*

  • @DaleAkins01
    @DaleAkins012 ай бұрын

    LOL Like a crackhead looking for his rock... Keep on looking. GL.

  • @buckroger6456
    @buckroger64562 ай бұрын

    Interesting video 👍 definitely looking forward to more videos.

  • @ManojPreshantha-pk2wt
    @ManojPreshantha-pk2wt2 ай бұрын

    I like your heading to right direction ?

  • @rezadaneshi
    @rezadaneshi2 ай бұрын

    I'm not sure the structure or construct of our physics based on a lifecycle like ours, being born to parents and dying, willfully discounting the perpetual nature of our particle's existence in a chaotic recycling, incapable of seeing a spark of consciousness experience of beginning and ending; which can be looked at as us being perpetual cyclical being. How many Stars supernovae, to live forever, in me and you. Not that it answers creation questions if viewed as such, but it lessens the ambiguity by seeing our place, in such patterns. Time is perpetual, it still slows down and speeds up without evidence of having a beginning. Where does a circle start? Now take the same circle, and look at it as a 3d image of a cork screw, but this corkscrew, goes on forever, A 2d rendition of a corkscrew, is an expanding circle. Now, we have a begriming. Beginning of an expanding circle, is its focal point, Call it as you wish, but consciousness could simply be incapable of grasping whatever truth lies behind where anything happened first, not having any frame of reference besides a cyclical universe, perpetuating itself. Or the universe that Recycles with black holes born in a galaxy born in and out of supermassive black holes, undoubtedly created before and after Big Bang, thanks almost entirely to JWST. Real truth is, we will never know. We may never have a clear picture as our species is too young or too old, where the light of previous universe hasn't arrived yet or its long gone, for clues to how the cycles might have been different leading to different possibilities.

  • @Margitataybae22
    @Margitataybae222 ай бұрын

    The universe the Earth the Moon the stars all were created by God in 7 days sorry but the truth is the truth the evidence all over also may God bless you

  • @ShrinathArolkar-en8py
    @ShrinathArolkar-en8py2 ай бұрын

    Are you a space denier😅

  • @ManojPreshantha-pk2wt
    @ManojPreshantha-pk2wt2 ай бұрын

    If you going to understand cosmology. Keeping in mind about god.. pls..conversation over .

  • @umdude.
    @umdude.2 ай бұрын

    proof?

  • @Gesus_23
    @Gesus_232 ай бұрын

    Shit video. Regurgitated and plagiarised

  • @billyhess5263
    @billyhess52632 ай бұрын

    What’s “the university of Ohio”? Are you saying “Ohio university” or “The Ohio state university”?

  • @ovrorbitplus
    @ovrorbitplus2 ай бұрын

    Ohio University. Thanks for checking out our content!!

  • @brandongreen1177
    @brandongreen11772 ай бұрын

    Cheers! And thank you.

  • @JAYDELROSARIQ
    @JAYDELROSARIQ2 ай бұрын

    VluxjLVQURJjÑ,QUR

  • @calvindibartolo2686
    @calvindibartolo26862 ай бұрын

    Bye AI spammer

  • @Fido-vm9zi
    @Fido-vm9zi2 ай бұрын

    Interesting information! Thank you!

  • @calvindibartolo2686
    @calvindibartolo26862 ай бұрын

    if only it were real....

  • @thebudman1980
    @thebudman19803 ай бұрын

    Once there is enough mass your stopped yet still have spin. In superposition. Because you can't move or go to point A or B. You cannot escape the single point itself. Not even light. Similar to absolute zero. We can't get all the way to absolute zero. No motion. No matter if your stopped or going really fast. From your own point of reference you don't move. You still go 0 percent the speed of light even at 99 percent according to another persons point of reference in comparison. Both are true. We move yet we don't move at the same time. We are all entangled and this explains jinxes and other phenomena. Feeling close to a loved one your deeply entangled with in each others lives. Knowing something bad is happening to a loved one far away with no way of knowing. Or someone telling you to not do that because your going to get in trouble or hurt and you do when this is something you normally did through your life. Your more strongly or weakly entangled in each others lives depending on how much you interact. Planck length is a constant and when anything changes everything else changes to everywhere instantly and the neutrino when something with mass is along its path having the traits of a neutrino the neutrino loses it's bond with space time goes straight oscillates and then meets back up with space time where space time levels back off and why entanglement works is information didn't have to go anywhere. It is all right here where you are. Antimatter may be us in another time. Don't forget the sun on the other side of the fabric of space. Many things become true at the same time. Such as uncertainty existing and certainty also exist at the same time. So there is a photo of adams in superposition that each time you look will be different and they are neatly arranged. This proves uncertainty. Yet one other thing is also true at the same time. If you change any of the atome you can see. The rest have to change to fit. Such as spin and position. I made a drawing of this to explain this and a video. Change any position of the way the atoms or electrons or facing. If they don't change position to fit it's more chaotic and they bounce around everywhere. They have to be in that position to fit while in superposition frozen down to near absolute zero. Change any of them the rest must change position or they are not neatly arranged. So when they entangled particles information didn't travel anywhere. Also when you do anything at all. This leaves and influence on everything else more strongly or weekly depending on how strongly or weakly your entangled. From your point of reference you do not know how anything changes everything else and you always see a new version of your friend exactly the same until this point. Timeline splits infinitely. The state changes. You still have a universe but the universe is a paradox. If you get closer to a sun or something in superposition. Time is stopped for you.