Adam Grant is Wharton’s top-rated professor and author of two New York Times bestselling books-ORIGINALS: How Non-Conformists Move the World and GIVE AND TAKE: A Revolutionary Approach to Success.
When you help someone, they often want to help you in return.
@impactmakerstribeАй бұрын
Thinking again is important to stay flexible , avoid mistakes and grow.
@impactmakerstribeАй бұрын
Waiting is important because it helps us make better decisions and appreciate things more.
@drinkapavlovic3 ай бұрын
WOW! I have just watched you and prof.Huberman, so I understand the context..thank you prof.Grant🙏
@loudenlaffnite2468 ай бұрын
Despicable that Adam Grant connivingly tried to have Coleman Hughes's TED Talk suppressed behind the scenes (and even did so by disingenuously citing a study that actually only reinforced Hughes's point). This is Marxist repressive-tolerance scumbaggery from a pop-psych snake oil salesman white saviour (who's ironically trying to suppress the voice of a black man?!).
@Kafkaesque7868 ай бұрын
Fantastic insights. Writing is a lonely job. Will deifinitely look up some of your writings. Thank you for this.
@JodyBruchon8 ай бұрын
Adam Grant is a dishonest scumbag. He tried to suppress a talk about color-blindness.
@VietStandard.Since.20129 ай бұрын
There is an excellent book. Thank you so much for your valuable contribution to the life!
@brettmorgan28211 ай бұрын
Just read Think Again. Great book, and was about to read it again, but just got Originals. What a quandary.
@wenyang5916 Жыл бұрын
Can't believe no comments and so few views. Great conversation, and a lot of good tips! Thank you Adam
@naycooknelson Жыл бұрын
This is so so good. Underrated conversation even today. This should happen again
@impactmakerstribeАй бұрын
Insightful for sure
@jessejones5699 Жыл бұрын
Where’s the rest of the video?
@MattMussett Жыл бұрын
What is boundaries are respected?
@karolina2293 Жыл бұрын
I would like to be like you !!!
@Krasbin Жыл бұрын
Values and personality should be closely connected. Values and personality are also both context dependent, of course.
@andymiron7941 Жыл бұрын
People that rise faster than others agree with those above and suck d*ck..Or they are useless as workers so they get promoted to managers instead.
@3dsong700 Жыл бұрын
Hi i am from India, Ur video most helpful for me , i wanna once talk with you for 2 min , if u will allow me then i can try to contact with u
@arthurgutierrez2729 Жыл бұрын
Please educate me. It seems to me that this talk is somewhat contradicting to your new book of "Think again" is thinking again a maximizer mindset or satisficer? Will there be a point in which the pursuit of Improvement becomes unhealthy. Does being a scientist mindset always equate to happier life?
@irishdancercm Жыл бұрын
As a former diver too, I am so glad to know the more human side of you.
@frankchavez9413 Жыл бұрын
You guys suck… like suck^3 … like SUCK to the 3rd°… like SUCK x INFINITY^2… you SUCK!
@calchase12 жыл бұрын
Don’t use that analogy again or I’ll take you out behind the barn after I knock you off your social high dive.
@talorix2 жыл бұрын
Basically, create systems. Loved this, gonna spread this 💯
@candacemyers27182 жыл бұрын
How can you accurately assess something if you don't understand it at all? I read an article you wrote in 2015 about mbti and the way you described it led me to think you know nothing about it except from easily available info from a quick Google search. Do you know anything about functions and what differentiates the different types besides a letter? I also saw a comment where you said there's not enough evidence on this theory. Well, no sh**. People get typed wrong all the time and what little evidence there is, could be inaccurate based on this alone. Doesn't mean there's no truth to be had here. "We all have blind spots in our knowledge and opinions. The bad news is that they can leave us blind to our blindness, which gives us false confidence in our judgment and prevents us from rethinking."
@GloriousGrunt2 жыл бұрын
Wow a mentorship pyramid scheme! lol
@RAJSINGH-of9iy2 жыл бұрын
I am liike WTF!!! while watching Mark Cuban.
@AlebachewTube2 жыл бұрын
Really helpful advice for decision-making to act accordingly. Thank you so much
@kimberleyknighton54102 жыл бұрын
/within us, we are both. AS PEOPLE become leaders, their extroversion increases. Most extroverts would 'fall' into introversion, unless careful and most introverts would fall into distraction unless careful
@anastasiapopelnukha16782 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing, I admire your work.
@vspatmx74582 жыл бұрын
Switch to 0.25x speed And then click on 1:01
@preetiw66302 жыл бұрын
Dwight is feeling very happy seeing himself on KZread as the best salesman
@KanchanaManyam3 жыл бұрын
Many have been labelled, judged using tools like these for years.... Cant undo. Can stop future damage
@davaajisaputra89603 жыл бұрын
Gw komen pertama
@perrinefarque3 жыл бұрын
Another inspiring video! Thank you Adam for sharing your wisdom with us!
@123axel1233 жыл бұрын
- Myers Briggs is highly correlated with Big 5. How can one critique one without the other? - Carl Jung did armchair theorising? Really? He was a psychoanalyst. Isn't talking to lots of people theory building? - Big 5 classifies some people as introverted, neurotic, disagreeable, and disordered. How useful is such a value-laden classification in woke times? - "It is disconcerting not knowing if I am introvert or extroverted" Such false crocodile tears. - "People answer the test the way they want to be" Hello? No test MBTI or Big 5 or HEXACO will work if people do not answer honestly
@joybeans103 жыл бұрын
Will get my copy asap.
@94964532173 жыл бұрын
Baldy... Bullshit
@vanessaherrera58903 жыл бұрын
Preordered it last month! 😍😎🙌🎁🎉🎉🎉
@christellis75483 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for it
@krishnapiyush13 жыл бұрын
omg this is the most informative-yet-unintentionally-oh-so-funny video I have ever seen!! you guys should start a goofing in the park and talking about stuff series..
@Aryanfeb63 жыл бұрын
I’m currently reading Originals. It’s really addictive, not a avid reader, but really like the case studies/ real unknown research cases. Making impact on my perspective . A positive one. Thank you.
@impactmakerstribeАй бұрын
Love this book
@prakash_773 жыл бұрын
Awesome.
@creativewaytolearn34343 жыл бұрын
Karma kzread.info/dash/bejne/hnyTzbSoltfQY7Q.html
@carlosdutra77213 жыл бұрын
Muito bom! Adorei!
@herbpalmerjr55623 жыл бұрын
fear vs faith
@herbpalmerjr55623 жыл бұрын
no
@herbpalmerjr55623 жыл бұрын
funny lobster lab media #sharktank #rocklobster
@scorpiorat253 жыл бұрын
This is an extremely valuable session, not just on going for a PhD (or not) but in teaching people how to successfully create a satisfying future. My biggest takeaway, and this is not a small thing, is... pick the question you want to study the rest of your life. Great work, Adam. I am grateful for your generosity.
@Bradley_Pitt3 жыл бұрын
First I'm so, very, sorry to request an answer to this question which is not related to this video. I am teaching English in a high school in South Korea and came to meet your excerpt, which has some ambiguous grammar in some sentences. However, I cannot help but ask you that question; that is, from your book, Originals, a paragraph of the book was used in the national practice exam(I hope you must have been contacted by the EBS), the part is here-(I know some more original sentences were not here, the test maker must have cut them.) If creators knew when they were on their way to fashioning a masterpiece, their work would progress only forward: they would halt their idea generation efforts as they struck gold. But they backtrack, returning to versions that they had earlier discarded as inadequate. In Beethoven’s most celebrated work, the Fifth Symphony, he scrapped the conclusion of the first movement because it felt too short, only to come back to it later. Had Beethoven been able to distinguish an extraordinary from an ordinary work, he would have accepted his composition immediately as a hit. When Picasso was painting his famous Guernica in protest of fascism, he produced 79 different drawings. Many of the images in the painting were based on his early sketches, not the later variations. If Picasso could judge his creations as he produced them, he would get consistently “warmer” and use the later drawings. But in reality, it was just as common that he got “colder.” What I'm wondering about is 3 sentences. The first sentence looks like it is a 2nd conditional, that is counterfactual. As you know, 2nd conditional is used for imaginary or false situation to the present and(or) future(if you say it isn't 2nd conditional, please tell me what it is.). But 2nd conditional is used in the present or future, but "when they were on their way to fashioning a masterpiece" is the past, we English learner fall in chaos, which seems ungrammatical. So I thought like this, ok, if when clause is the time of supposing, though that time is the surely the past, you take us on the "Time Machine" to that past moment, and you and we are watching creators 'are' making masterpieces. So that moment is the present(though seen as the past from now), so you wrote the first sentence using "at that past time " 2nd conditional. And this logic also is also applied to this sentence; if Picasso could judge his creations as he produced them, he would get consistently “warmer” and use the later drawings. He is dead. What he did is always the past bygone. So all his deed should be always used in sentences using 3rd conditional if you suppose the past events as counterfactually. But you used 2nd conditional in that sentence. So I think you take us on the time machine to the past time. Last, in "But they backtrack, returning to versions that they had earlier discarded as inadequate.", you used past perfective instead of using simple past. I suppose that all the masterpieces are past things, that is, they were made already in the past. So you used past perfective to note that all the versions had been discarded before a masterpiece was made. In addition to those above, I think you suppose all the creator are only human beings, who don't have an ability to forecast what will happen in the future. So this trait is the same throughout the timeline. So I guess you used "backtrack" instead of "backtracked". If you had used "backtracked", that wouldn' have meant that the creators backtracked in the past, which is contrary to the supposition you have about human beings who can't forecast the future. Well, I don't know whether I can get answers from you. But It's really serious to me. Please tell me whether my opinion is right or wrong.
@annarae-jones51963 жыл бұрын
I am soo happy to have stumbled upon your work and appreciate the passion and hard work you've put in for the better of others. It is extremely relevant to my own message as a coach - helping 'selfless givers' learn to give more sustainably and successfully. Thank you.
@wanlingjiang82703 жыл бұрын
I wish a saw your video before I get my PhD, I'm very easily influenced by people around me, if somebody can inspire me more to get me more interested in a certain field, that would be great. And another problem is you can only get into a research that the professor is currently working on, and that is not necessarily what I'm interested in. And it is difficult to get into a field that you are interested in.
Пікірлер
When you help someone, they often want to help you in return.
Thinking again is important to stay flexible , avoid mistakes and grow.
Waiting is important because it helps us make better decisions and appreciate things more.
WOW! I have just watched you and prof.Huberman, so I understand the context..thank you prof.Grant🙏
Despicable that Adam Grant connivingly tried to have Coleman Hughes's TED Talk suppressed behind the scenes (and even did so by disingenuously citing a study that actually only reinforced Hughes's point). This is Marxist repressive-tolerance scumbaggery from a pop-psych snake oil salesman white saviour (who's ironically trying to suppress the voice of a black man?!).
Fantastic insights. Writing is a lonely job. Will deifinitely look up some of your writings. Thank you for this.
Adam Grant is a dishonest scumbag. He tried to suppress a talk about color-blindness.
There is an excellent book. Thank you so much for your valuable contribution to the life!
Just read Think Again. Great book, and was about to read it again, but just got Originals. What a quandary.
Can't believe no comments and so few views. Great conversation, and a lot of good tips! Thank you Adam
This is so so good. Underrated conversation even today. This should happen again
Insightful for sure
Where’s the rest of the video?
What is boundaries are respected?
I would like to be like you !!!
Values and personality should be closely connected. Values and personality are also both context dependent, of course.
People that rise faster than others agree with those above and suck d*ck..Or they are useless as workers so they get promoted to managers instead.
Hi i am from India, Ur video most helpful for me , i wanna once talk with you for 2 min , if u will allow me then i can try to contact with u
Please educate me. It seems to me that this talk is somewhat contradicting to your new book of "Think again" is thinking again a maximizer mindset or satisficer? Will there be a point in which the pursuit of Improvement becomes unhealthy. Does being a scientist mindset always equate to happier life?
As a former diver too, I am so glad to know the more human side of you.
You guys suck… like suck^3 … like SUCK to the 3rd°… like SUCK x INFINITY^2… you SUCK!
Don’t use that analogy again or I’ll take you out behind the barn after I knock you off your social high dive.
Basically, create systems. Loved this, gonna spread this 💯
How can you accurately assess something if you don't understand it at all? I read an article you wrote in 2015 about mbti and the way you described it led me to think you know nothing about it except from easily available info from a quick Google search. Do you know anything about functions and what differentiates the different types besides a letter? I also saw a comment where you said there's not enough evidence on this theory. Well, no sh**. People get typed wrong all the time and what little evidence there is, could be inaccurate based on this alone. Doesn't mean there's no truth to be had here. "We all have blind spots in our knowledge and opinions. The bad news is that they can leave us blind to our blindness, which gives us false confidence in our judgment and prevents us from rethinking."
Wow a mentorship pyramid scheme! lol
I am liike WTF!!! while watching Mark Cuban.
Really helpful advice for decision-making to act accordingly. Thank you so much
/within us, we are both. AS PEOPLE become leaders, their extroversion increases. Most extroverts would 'fall' into introversion, unless careful and most introverts would fall into distraction unless careful
thanks for sharing, I admire your work.
Switch to 0.25x speed And then click on 1:01
Dwight is feeling very happy seeing himself on KZread as the best salesman
Many have been labelled, judged using tools like these for years.... Cant undo. Can stop future damage
Gw komen pertama
Another inspiring video! Thank you Adam for sharing your wisdom with us!
- Myers Briggs is highly correlated with Big 5. How can one critique one without the other? - Carl Jung did armchair theorising? Really? He was a psychoanalyst. Isn't talking to lots of people theory building? - Big 5 classifies some people as introverted, neurotic, disagreeable, and disordered. How useful is such a value-laden classification in woke times? - "It is disconcerting not knowing if I am introvert or extroverted" Such false crocodile tears. - "People answer the test the way they want to be" Hello? No test MBTI or Big 5 or HEXACO will work if people do not answer honestly
Will get my copy asap.
Baldy... Bullshit
Preordered it last month! 😍😎🙌🎁🎉🎉🎉
Can't wait for it
omg this is the most informative-yet-unintentionally-oh-so-funny video I have ever seen!! you guys should start a goofing in the park and talking about stuff series..
I’m currently reading Originals. It’s really addictive, not a avid reader, but really like the case studies/ real unknown research cases. Making impact on my perspective . A positive one. Thank you.
Love this book
Awesome.
Karma kzread.info/dash/bejne/hnyTzbSoltfQY7Q.html
Muito bom! Adorei!
fear vs faith
no
funny lobster lab media #sharktank #rocklobster
This is an extremely valuable session, not just on going for a PhD (or not) but in teaching people how to successfully create a satisfying future. My biggest takeaway, and this is not a small thing, is... pick the question you want to study the rest of your life. Great work, Adam. I am grateful for your generosity.
First I'm so, very, sorry to request an answer to this question which is not related to this video. I am teaching English in a high school in South Korea and came to meet your excerpt, which has some ambiguous grammar in some sentences. However, I cannot help but ask you that question; that is, from your book, Originals, a paragraph of the book was used in the national practice exam(I hope you must have been contacted by the EBS), the part is here-(I know some more original sentences were not here, the test maker must have cut them.) If creators knew when they were on their way to fashioning a masterpiece, their work would progress only forward: they would halt their idea generation efforts as they struck gold. But they backtrack, returning to versions that they had earlier discarded as inadequate. In Beethoven’s most celebrated work, the Fifth Symphony, he scrapped the conclusion of the first movement because it felt too short, only to come back to it later. Had Beethoven been able to distinguish an extraordinary from an ordinary work, he would have accepted his composition immediately as a hit. When Picasso was painting his famous Guernica in protest of fascism, he produced 79 different drawings. Many of the images in the painting were based on his early sketches, not the later variations. If Picasso could judge his creations as he produced them, he would get consistently “warmer” and use the later drawings. But in reality, it was just as common that he got “colder.” What I'm wondering about is 3 sentences. The first sentence looks like it is a 2nd conditional, that is counterfactual. As you know, 2nd conditional is used for imaginary or false situation to the present and(or) future(if you say it isn't 2nd conditional, please tell me what it is.). But 2nd conditional is used in the present or future, but "when they were on their way to fashioning a masterpiece" is the past, we English learner fall in chaos, which seems ungrammatical. So I thought like this, ok, if when clause is the time of supposing, though that time is the surely the past, you take us on the "Time Machine" to that past moment, and you and we are watching creators 'are' making masterpieces. So that moment is the present(though seen as the past from now), so you wrote the first sentence using "at that past time " 2nd conditional. And this logic also is also applied to this sentence; if Picasso could judge his creations as he produced them, he would get consistently “warmer” and use the later drawings. He is dead. What he did is always the past bygone. So all his deed should be always used in sentences using 3rd conditional if you suppose the past events as counterfactually. But you used 2nd conditional in that sentence. So I think you take us on the time machine to the past time. Last, in "But they backtrack, returning to versions that they had earlier discarded as inadequate.", you used past perfective instead of using simple past. I suppose that all the masterpieces are past things, that is, they were made already in the past. So you used past perfective to note that all the versions had been discarded before a masterpiece was made. In addition to those above, I think you suppose all the creator are only human beings, who don't have an ability to forecast what will happen in the future. So this trait is the same throughout the timeline. So I guess you used "backtrack" instead of "backtracked". If you had used "backtracked", that wouldn' have meant that the creators backtracked in the past, which is contrary to the supposition you have about human beings who can't forecast the future. Well, I don't know whether I can get answers from you. But It's really serious to me. Please tell me whether my opinion is right or wrong.
I am soo happy to have stumbled upon your work and appreciate the passion and hard work you've put in for the better of others. It is extremely relevant to my own message as a coach - helping 'selfless givers' learn to give more sustainably and successfully. Thank you.
I wish a saw your video before I get my PhD, I'm very easily influenced by people around me, if somebody can inspire me more to get me more interested in a certain field, that would be great. And another problem is you can only get into a research that the professor is currently working on, and that is not necessarily what I'm interested in. And it is difficult to get into a field that you are interested in.