Пікірлер

• 
  @johnstorey392323 күн бұрын

  White prople done made a new ocean smh

• 
  @scottydu81Ай бұрын

  There is a google earth review of this written by a very funny and very late sit-down comedian

• 
  @imathreat2092 ай бұрын

  I'll fight that tsunami

• 
  @grindupBaker3 ай бұрын

  Global Ocean Circulation: Antarctica. Two DIFFERENT things happen in this region. The surface water driven north as shown "pulls" deep water below south to Antarctica at depths 200m to 800m or thereabouts (so below the 0m-200m, roughly surface water being driven north above by the wind). That's a simple local overturning cycle of 200m-800m warm (0-2 degrees) water coming in, melting 2.3 trillion tonnes of ice per year off the Antarctica ice, freshening, getting "light", rising to surface because it's light, cooled to about -1.8 degrees and driven north (*so it came in at 1.0 degrees, cooled to -1.8 degrees, melting ice, rose to surface and wind drove it north. --------- Separately, the vast high--pressure, cold, salty water pumps (like pile drivers) at locations around Antarctica force water under increased pressure to the sea bed at -0.5 degrees northward up all oceans at a huge flow of 25.8 Sv and travel the sea bed at 0.0 degrees lifting the entire global ocean depth of 5,800 m above them by their high force except that the force is withheld in North Atlantic by the same thing around Greenland (the AMOC force and 17.5 Sv flow) with a Mexican Standoff at the Atlantic equator and this Antarctica AABW denser water then lifting the Greenland AMOC LNADW-UNADW to the surface further south (like a crowbar wedged under it). Arctic Ocean is a tiny paddling pool not an ocean and the 25.8 Sv AABW from the Antarctica vast high--pressure, cold, salty water pumps lifts the rest of the global ocean by about 2.7 metres (9 feet) per year. The permanent thermocline is only 650 m deep and temperature 5.0 degrees at the bottom, 27.0 degrees at the top, the lowest 89% of ocean 650 m down to 5,800 m deep is 0.0 degrees at the bottom and 5.0 degrees at the top so this vast area of "warm water lens" is literally lifted by being wedged up underneath by 2.7 metres per year which entirely replaces it with nice new 5.0 degrees water once per 650/2.7 = 240 years (of course, the sunshine and various mixings warm the water as it rises). That's called Global ThermoHaline Circulation (THC) or "Global Ocean Conveyor" and an old bloke "Wally Broecker" invented it using a giant stirring spoon and got a big bowl of pancake batter dumped on his head when he crossed the Pacific Equator. Serves him right.

• 
  @AlgoNudger4 ай бұрын

  Thanks. 😊

• 
  @shedontanks4 ай бұрын

  OK

• 
  @mistermikel69525 ай бұрын

  what a handsome and intelligent man <3

• 
  @schmiddy26695 ай бұрын

  Ich Liebe dich <3

• 
  @benjamindangelmaier38635 ай бұрын

  Ich auch <3

• 
  @joko47685 ай бұрын

  This man is very attractive and comes across as very nice, I think Lenovo has chosen just the right person.

• 
  @datsmileyypotheadd19685 ай бұрын

  The ocean nutted😂

• 
  @b0mazor6 ай бұрын

  Witness compendum 7 of Encyclopedia Galactica

• 
  @Tomas_France_6 ай бұрын

  I was there bit outran the wave

• 
  @brokenheart-yb3hc6 ай бұрын

  Tsunami is the name of a large and long wave. Tsunami can destroy an entire city. But in this simulation there are many waves coming. This is possible during tsunami??

• 
  @user-tx4wq9wd7h4 ай бұрын

  Yes

• 
  @brokenheart-yb3hc4 ай бұрын

  @@user-tx4wq9wd7h thank you

• 
  @acharawilliams6172Ай бұрын

  Yes

• 
  @stevemather74346 ай бұрын

  Could you add in the bellows effect caused by the lift and fall of floating ice forcing water into the grounding and shallow areas of the glaciers.?

• 
  @NGC-catseye6 ай бұрын

  This was a perfect opportunity to show me the volcanoes and you didn’t😾

• 
  @stewartread42356 ай бұрын

  SiSo (or GiGo) comes to mind, the Antarctic with never melt while humans are on the planet.!

• 
  @jacksmith77266 ай бұрын

  Music is annoying so i turned sound off

• 
  @bimmjim7 ай бұрын

  Humans will be better off if we return to the *STABLE* Pliocene climate. In the Pliocene, the Melakovich cycles did not control the climate. We can do this by mimicking the good feedback loops of the Pliocene, dust storms and algae blooms.

• 
  @Less1leg27 ай бұрын

  gotta love theatrics. First off. how come you guys never put up videos when your assumptions go into the ditch. You put a lot of disinformation up as factual. When so often all of your fearmongering Climate Change stuff goes off the rails and into the ditch. Please, weather changes, has forever changed, always will change. Some years its boom time in glacial growth, and then there are years of glacial retreat. For pretty much 11,000 years its been glacial retreat. It's not manmade, its cyclic and from the Sun's impingement upon the planet. But you eco-liberals can't tax the sun, but you sure can tax the living heck out of us on the planet. Tony Heller has been exposing your deceptions and outright lies for years.

• 
  @user-bk8tf6cw4b7 ай бұрын

  Thank you for making and sharing this important information.

• 
  @jimspear30337 ай бұрын

  It seems that warm water from inland is moving to the sea in places. Geothermal activity is melting ice and heating water under the ice in spots. This is an issue not addressed in the model. I remember IGY reports of subglacial geothermal activity causing ice melting. Why is this heat source ignored? Also gasses vented include carbon dioxide. Warming seawater releases carbon dioxide also.

• 
  @t00ls7427 ай бұрын

  since the 70s we have been putting more and more water in sealed containers....it can be anything from simple bottled water to dish soaps sports drinks, soups, closed chillers units, antifreeze...the list is very large and goes on water is made up of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom....which makes it a molecule ...one molecule is what we call vapor....it is only when a bunch of those molecules start clinging together that it is liquid the reason this is important is because H2O doesnt act like you think it does...because as it evaporates and becomes a vapor those molecules separate again now then...to the climate part every cooling system has a certain amount of coolant that is need to keep it at optimum temperature...earth is no different for instance take 2 pots of water...one 1/4 full and one all full.....heat them up at the same temperature.....the one that is 1/4 full heats up faster makes steam (humidity) faster same for the earth ...since all this water is being put in stored containers ...it is not circulated .....less H2O molecules in the air....they cant combine to make liquid that can circulate right now there are the same amount of H2O molecules on earth as there were in the beginning, so no, those molecules are not gone...they havent went into space....the reason they are gone is because we put them in sealed containers so if we deal with the water shortages ....water in sealed containers......then we can deal with the climate heating up or we can just wait till some of the ice is melted....yup because H2O as a solid doesnt circulate or evaporate till it is melted....once it is melted a little...the ground water and the heat index temps will be back to normal as I said...this is unrefined, I wrote it in a hurry to reply to a USA TODAY video on water disappearing I have this idea in my head and cant get it out in a coherent way for most people to understand...yes it goes way out there, but it is something that no one else is addressing , the water levels around the globe have decreased.....look at california, all the reservoirs.....michigan residents have stated that nestle has made their ground water drop in their rivers and streams.....there are documentaries on this I wish someone would actually look at this because I'm certain this is a big deal but as I said...we can just wait for the polar caps to melt and replenish the H2O molecules that are able to circulate remember...H2O is just a molecule until it combines (condenses) with another H2O molecule...then it becomes a gas, then a mist, then moisture, then water.....ask yourself...how many H2O molecules in a visible water drop...the answer is there are 1.67 sextillion H2O molecules in a water drop...fact www.thoughtco.com/atoms-in-a-drop-of-water-609425 you have to understand that H2O is not water...it is a molecule , and only becomes water when it is combined with a lot of other H2O molecules H2O goes through a cycle that is necessary for the earths temperature to remain optimum...when there isnt enough it alters that cycle I'm sorry if you people dont understand this, but this is correct the good news is, there are plenty of H2O molecules in stasis in the form of ice ....once enough has melted, the earth will go back to its optimum temperature because those molecules have been put back into the cycle the hydrologic cycle is the exchange of of energy that influences climate when water condenses, it releases energy and warms the environment when water evaporates, it takes energy from the surrounding environment, thereby dropping the temperature The bottled water market globally is rapidly growing with approximate 600 million households consuming bottled water in 2018. That’s more than 100 billion gallons (391 Billion litres) of water per year or 1 million bottles per minute.tappwater.co/en/how-many-people-consume-bottled-water-globally/ www.h2odistributors.com/pages/info/info-water-cycle.asp? fbclid=IwAR04GhTkh8vdN1N3wgiYCuLa2tCGVQZ6oPDx0FmveO-UOQY1xC3rdEPvTgc we also put oxygen and hydrogen in pressurized canisters separate from each other those atoms cant combine unless they are released...and I know there are millions and millions of those stored in warehouses all over the world

• 
  @garnet48467 ай бұрын

  More fake bs.used to push bs.

• 
  @shriRadhe...7 ай бұрын

  Radhe Radhe

• 
  @Peter-xo6bn7 ай бұрын

  Every year ice melts are the north and south poles true. However it also refreezes they never tell You that because it would counter their narrative that the sky is falling and We will all die. The truth is antarctic ice has been growing and adding more ice for the last 10 years that is true scientific fact which can be found on the net.

• 
  @bigsmiler51017 ай бұрын

  This says something is in "east Antarctica." How do we define "east or west" around the north or south pole??? If I stood on the exact South Pole and told to go "east" I'd have to spin clockwise. So please show us where east Antarctica is with a map.

• 
  @ditfos4 ай бұрын

  It's based on E or W longitudes. There is an Eastern Hemisphere and a Western hemisphere. Please see map on the wikipedia entry for "East Antarctica".

• 
  @psikeyhackr69147 ай бұрын

  This is really interesting! Scientists have the computing power and software sophistication to do things like this, but they cannot even ask if the distribution of steel down the Twin Towers is important to analyzing the collapses. How much CO2 has the US military put into the atmosphere as a consequence of 9/11? Of course the number of people killed is irrelevant.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  @2:30 Please stop your insane predictions of rapid sea level rise ... As the ice shelves rapidly melt, they will soon lose the ability to hold the thousands of glaciers in place ... and what happens next? You don't know ... ? Do you have the mind of a child or do you have the mind of an adult?

• 
  @mhandy617 ай бұрын

  As the arctic is growing so fast. Check your information. Like pole shift....

• 
  @-LightningRod-7 ай бұрын

  HILARIOUS

• 
  @cherylm2C66717 ай бұрын

  Thank you for sharing this presentation.

• 
  @ralphholiman74017 ай бұрын

  Well, I am sixty five and live a mile from the beach at 40 feet elevation. Hopefully, before I die, I will have waterfront property.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  For one second you will, and then you will have nothing - because sea level rise is irrelevant - it's the rapidly-approaching colossal tsunami waves that you should be aware of

• 
  @user-nc3up7sj8p7 ай бұрын

  Has anyone detected Quarks yet?

• 
  @lmj066 ай бұрын

  Yes. The first evidence of quarks occured from an experiment in 1968 at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

• 
  @singingway7 ай бұрын

  This does not convey what you want to the public. A "simulation" to them, means you "made this up" like an animator drawing a movie. Using "somewhat magically" just reinforces this misunderstanding of what they are actually viewing. They also don't understand "models." You should, instead, explain that you are creating this visualization by inputting observed data.

• 
  @JWRay-xh9wl7 ай бұрын

  All they need to do is show satellite imagining for the almost 8 years since this modeling was done for 2016. There is one. And it's frightening.

• 
  @garnet48467 ай бұрын

  ​@JWRay-xh9lol ya, id love to see it. wl

• 
  @garnet48467 ай бұрын

  It is fake and made up, maybe a child can explain it to you.

• 
  @xxwookey7 ай бұрын

  Very nice visualisation. Some glacier/bay-names would help those of us not intimately familiar with the Antarctic understand which bit we are looking at when the isometric view rotates around the coastline. This really helped understand what some of the process and geography looks like, but it also just brings more questions. When you strip back to the iso-salinity layer (2:02) - how deep is that 'surface' approximately? 1km? 2? And clearly parts of that 'surface' are above freezing, and thus promote melting if in contact with ice. Is all the water above that in the column colder? I was well aware of the research from a few years about about the grounding line of some WA glaciers being undermined by warm water and accelerating movement and melt rates, but I hadn;t appreciated the way that the underwater 'coastline' (is there a word for that?) is a lot shallower at the glacier mouths (analogous to a river delta I guess), so mostly the warm water is below that level and not touching the glacier foot. The simulation seems to show the ice surface, but not the underwater ice wall. Is that right, or is it just hidden? At say 2:42, should we be imagining a nearly-vertical ice-front under the glacier going down to the seafloor and touching the tongue of warmer water? If so this would be easier to understand if that was made visible in some way. Sorry to pick holes in your visualisation which no doubt took forever to make. :-) I'm just giving feedback on how it could be made clearer to laypeople.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  The undersides of the ice shelves have rapidly melted down over the past ten years - which results in the "ice wall" rapidly diminishing in height - this is documented by numerous independent sources - including underwater cameras, underwater submersibles, video footage from cruise ship passengers, video footage from work crew members, video footage from helicopters that show the ice shelves and glaciers imploding with massive cracks and so on. The rapid melting of the underside of the ice shelves and the glaciers is the result of massive heat rising up from the calderas beneath the ice sheet - especially beneath Thwaites - and from beneath the Ross Ice Shelf which is the size of France - dozens of other ice shelves and glaciers have been massively melting down over the past ten years.

• 
  @xxwookey7 ай бұрын

  @@WhirledPublishing Do you mean 'calderas' here? That's a volcanic feature, and won't have changed its heat-flux much/at all in the last few hundred thousand years. The melting of the undersides of the glaciers is due to changes in the temp/circulation of the coastal waters, as shown in this simulation, isn't it?

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  @@xxwookey When you become a Doctoral Scholar with over 50 years of research - when you've done decades of research in dozens of languages from all across our Earth - when you've compiled thousands of sources, served as an Expert Witness for the Court Judges and tested off the WAIS-R, let's you and I sit down and have an intelligent conversation - now is not the time. When you regurgitate insane theories from the fake "scientific community" that graduated with their C average from low level institutions with minimal entrance requirement, you are spewing forth the adolescent guessing games, juvenile wild imaginings and unsubstantiated claims from those with the mind of a child - since you don't have the intelligence to realize this, you can look up the 85 to 115 IQ's of the "scientific community" and you can do the research to see that the 85 to 115 IQ's are the intellectual equivalent of school children ... so hurl all their timeline lies and other lunacy into the rubbish where it belongs - because science requires facts and data - not unsubstantiated claims from those with the mind of a child.

• 
  @xxwookey7 ай бұрын

  @@WhirledPublishing Well I have compiled thousands of sources (and fixed quite a lot of them for new architectures etc), but I'm not a specialist in ice science and don't need to be to have a useful conversation. Anyone who says 'you are clearly too ill-educted to talk to, and I'm extremely clever', rather than actually answering the question comes across as a bit of a pompous twat. And when they start suggesting that the whole scientific community doesn't know what it is talking about and puts it in air quotes, then they come across as a conspiracy loon. Science does work, despite the limitations of the people doing it. I take it that you disagree with Mr Rignot about the mechanisms of WA glacier undercutting, although not the fact that it is happening? Some reasoning or alternative theories would help your case. But fine, if you don't want to answer the question, that's OK.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  @@xxwookey Please go talk to someone stupid - smh

• 
  @woodchipgardens90847 ай бұрын

  The Mostly Man Made Climate Theory is terribly inconsistent at intensifying drought or excessive rain, the Facts of Climate History that we can point to without a doubt are, Large Volcanic Eruptions only occur about once every 6-8 years, California and other States receive excessive rain fall about once every 6-8 years, the excessive rain always begins Within 6-10 months after the Eruptions, its undeniable facts were as the Man Made theory is terribly inconsistent. So what this means is California Water managers need to make it last for 6 years minimum and dont blame Climate for facts that we know about Climate. Next time we see a large Eruption, go to Vegas and place some betts.

• 
  @scratchthecatqwerty94207 ай бұрын

  Thanks! This cured my feet fetish!

• 
  @charlanpennington39897 ай бұрын

  Im sorry i told all my friends about the 2 gigaton addition of ice added to antarticas left bank every year so they went to the page and looked to see if I was lying. And then you had to close your whole national page about it. You know, the page maintained at the tip of South America, where the Antarctica records are kept by the USA.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  The public - and the glaciologists - are allowed to see only a tiny drivel of the horrifying meltdown - so next to no one realizes the catastrophic ricocheted domino effect that's rapidly approaching - I'm glad you got to see a few seconds of the kaleidoscope of hell ... so at least you know more than the others.

• 
  @chairman8237 ай бұрын

  A key word here is....simulation. It isn't real. I'm sure the scientists behind this are all very honest and worthy but you only get out of a program what you put in. Remember research projects like this need funding and you won't get that funding if you rock the boat.

• 
  @patrick247two7 ай бұрын

  That you.

• 
  @anthonymorris50847 ай бұрын

  This has been ongoing for the last 10,000 years. Anybody who thinks you can stop this by taxing people or embracing wind and solar is delusional.

• 
  @joelstanhope72317 ай бұрын

  Lol ! Its interesting you only show this for January which is the warmest month at the south pole . How about now you tell everybody what happens in july which is the coldest . Yep figured youd skip that . Satellite images show the north and south poles have just fine for the last 50 years . People do your own research , dont fall victim to a narrative

• 
  @davedixon20687 ай бұрын

  I was going to make a comment about how wrong you are but why bother, you wont change your entrenched position so lets just wait a few years and we will see who turns out to be right, hope it is you because if its me we are in deep sh*t

• 
  @calvin26417 ай бұрын

  Post your sources then, if you believe yourself to be right. Let’s see your evidence

• 
  @davedixon20687 ай бұрын

  @@calvin2641 try british antarctic expedition or nat geo

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  @@davedixon2068 If you pack and relocate and stock up and prepare for hell on Earth, you can escape the worst of the deep sh*t that will kill everyone else - but you'd need to know where to go - and you probably don't - and your survival instinct probably isn't working anymore anyway - because of all the poisons in the food and beverages and because of all the doo-doo that's spoon-fed to you and everyone else - all your life.

• 
  @adriandocherty7787 ай бұрын

  How do you measure sea levels with changing tides & weather?? I thought ice melts from the outside in??

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  Sea level rise has been minimal because of the massive extraction of sand along the coasts of Australia, Africa, South Asia and so on - massive dredging of rivers and lakes and canals have also helped to keep sea level rise to a minimum. In Hawaii, huge piles of debris were hauled out and left sitting on the beaches - this is going on - worldwide - which helps to maintain sea levels at a constant - but mostly the haul is from billions of gigatons of sand which is used to construct thousands of high-rise buildings - worldwide.

• 
  @-LightningRod-7 ай бұрын

  @@WhirledPublishing uhm,...No.

• 
  @garnet48467 ай бұрын

  ​@@WhirledPublishingwhat a hot load of bs.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  @@garnet4846 When you become a Doctoral Scholar with over 50 years of research that includes studying Chemistry and Physics for decades, Geological Formations, Wave Propagation and Cataclysms for decades, when you've studied the old literature and the reports of the Indigenous and Aborigines and tribes of Africa and the reports of the First Nations, when you've compiled thousands of sources, documented in dozens of languages from all across our Earth, when you've tested off the WAIS-R, served as an Expert Witness for the Court Judges and have dozens of other impressive accomplishments and achievements that corroborated your IQ as "off the charts", let's you and I sit down and have an intelligent conversation - now is not the time.

• 
  @George.Coleman7 ай бұрын

  Watch this in 1.5x playback speed. Youre welcome

• 
  @George.Coleman7 ай бұрын

  Yay. Human mistakes

• 
  @steventhibert95318 ай бұрын

  Hey can you show a simulation of the sun freezeng . no thats because its a simulation or your a lier.

• 
  @Outmytree18 ай бұрын

  Nice simulation. The general laws of physics for fluids and thermal transfer are there, but it's a pity it doesn't reflect the real-world dynamics of what's really happening in the Artic Sea. The natural world is too darn finicky to model. You can't model a small piece of water in isolation without considering its context. Everything is related to everything, and everything can behave unpredictably. The relationships between sea, land and atmosphere are just far too complex for our best computers to handle. Where are the relationships of air streams, coriolis effect, air pressure, humidity levels, cloud cover, ocean currents? These haven't even been mentioned in this model, which defeats it's purpose, unless the Arctic is sitting inside it's own isolated container, in a vacuum and the lights turned off, and no magnetic radiation. Still, it would be interesting to compare these predictions against real data measurements over the next 50 to 100 years or more.

• 
  @fabeobd7 ай бұрын

  this model simulates Antarctica (not Arctic), and though I agree the interplay between ocean, atmosphere, cryosphere is very complex, this model does include (in some way) all the things you've mentioned: air streams, pressure, humidity, cloud cover are all included in the atmospheric forcing (from ERA-Interim ECMWF Reanalyses), coriolis effect and ocean currents are simulated by the ocean model. On top of it, it includes thermodynamic interactions with the Antarctic ice shelves (only model of this kind to include this in a circum-Antarctic domain of 2 km horizontal). It is a showcase of the current power of coupled models being simulated in the Australian supercomputer Gadi (from the National Computational Infrastructure). The model is validated against Satellite-based estimates of the ice shelf basal melt rates.

• 
  @jimhimes64517 ай бұрын

  No simulator can ever be accurate because there is just too much that would have to be included, some of which scientists are not even aware of, that no computer will be able to model for possibly the rest of this century. Despite what scientists try to tell us; our climate cannot be simulated on a computer! This is nice, but it's Not Accurate.

• 
  @WhirledPublishing7 ай бұрын

  All those factors you mention are irrelevant in comparison with the HEAT that's been rising up from the thousands of calderas beneath the ice shelves and beneath the thousands of glaciers - if you don't realize that then you're not going to understand what's going on - and you'll be oblivious to the cause of the thousands of glacial lakes and the thousands of glacial rivers and the thousands of moulins and the numerous wateralls that cascade over the ice walls. You'll also be oblivious to the hot cinder cones and the volcanic craters and lava fields that suddenly shoved their way up through the Ross Ice Shelf ... you'll fail to understand the true cause behind the "mystery" of the polynyas ... you'll fail to understand why Thwaites suddenly imploded and hurled thousands of icebergs into the Amundensen Sea... If you overlook all that - and if you overlook the rapid meltdown of the undersides of the ice shelves and the imploding glaciers with colossal cracks and rifts, and if you deny that thousands of colossal glaciers are sliding into the sea ... If you fail to realize what happens when the ice shelves meltdown so rapidly that they can no longer hold thousands of colossal glaciers in place ... If you fail to conceptualize what happens when thousands of colossal glaciers slide into the sea ... If you can't imagine the resulting water displacement from thousands of colossal glaciers ... If you're unaware of the timeline for the previous collapse of the glaciers into the seawater ... and if you don't know the consequences of that horror then you won't know that you should expect very few survivors - worldwide - you won't know that immediate action is required. Apparently, the mass majority of the world population are oblivious to the obvious.

• 
  @victorhuffman50688 ай бұрын

  The representation of is of surface freeze and thaw the necessary representation should be of thickness and graft as such

• 
  @robertodemenezeslyra35868 ай бұрын

  Lembrete: posicionar os vários vulcões da Antártida. E seus efeitos no clima. Obrigado

• 
  @psikeyhackr69147 ай бұрын

  Trivial!

• 
  @Papa_Tri8 ай бұрын

  An excellent showcase of what human-nature interference can lead to, hopefully this will get the attention it deserves.

• 
  @anthonymorris50847 ай бұрын

  Because you think humanity can actually stop this?

• 
  @nevermorefrompast-qx5wb7 ай бұрын

  @@anthonymorris5084 we can midigate it, tell me, if are driving and sudenly a car goes at you head on, do you give up???? or try and midigate teh dmg????

• 
  @anthonymorris50847 ай бұрын

  @@nevermorefrompast-qx5wb There is nothing anybody can do to "mitigate" the melting of ice. Warming is here to stay. It's a fact of life. You could end all fossil fuel production tonight at midnight across the planet, nothing would change. Your traffic analogy is a silly analogy. It also doesn't matter. Life flourishes under warming. Melting ice isn't going to kill or harm anything. Glaciers, Antarctic ice and Arctic ice have been melting and receding consistently for 10,000 years.

• 
  @nolaspeaker56567 ай бұрын

  If you buy an electric car and stop eating meat, the ice will stop melting.

• 
  @anthonymorris50847 ай бұрын

  @@nolaspeaker5656 Yes, I've heard this too. Raising taxes cools the planet as well. Repentance and continued self flagellation also stops warming.

• 
  @DrCorvid8 ай бұрын

  Nice simulation. I can not wait much longer for the mini ice age to let up a bit.