AI (what we call AI) can help detect common data patterns which are not immediately evident to the human data mining. It is incredible how what we - for years - have called "Data Mining" and "Data Analysis" are now been merged together, and called "Artificial Intelligence". With the "Data Training" being no more than an overextended calculation of matrix differentiation. It is incredible how far this system is from true intelligence, which is a biphasic operation of "Invent and choose". Best Regards, dear Prof. Unzicker... Greetings, Anthony
@user-tp7gy4dj4lСағат бұрын
Why did the string theorist cross the road? To get to the 10th dimension. Where did the string theorist hide from the experimentalist? Inside a gravitational singularity. Who did the string theorist buy a new particle accelerator for? Sweet SUSY. How many string theorists does it take to change a light bulb? 10 to the 500th power.
@michahcc2 сағат бұрын
He said himself to be just an ordinary guy.
@kr-sd3ni9 сағат бұрын
particle physics is done. it works. unless there is new theories to test, i dont think its a good idea.
@haroonrasheed384410 сағат бұрын
Has there been a greater waste of money than building the large hadron collider?
@pascalneraudeau208412 сағат бұрын
Excellent ! Thank you for this spotlight.
@quinto19012 сағат бұрын
What physicists need to understand, is that mathematics is just a tool to understand and work with nature. Somewhere in the last century it has been made primary. This can only lead to false conclusions. And it has, plenty of them.
@7000Worlds14 сағат бұрын
This further proves the earth is flat...
@Mohammad-bg1xc14 сағат бұрын
Sir I wish you can write a book or at least do a video on scientific thinking
@samlazar105319 сағат бұрын
What we have now is q perversion Not a Koperinkan method. Speculations and guesswork not testability
@jonmcmahon90292Күн бұрын
thank you. keep questioning these fundamental scientific 'assumptions' that everyone quotes as facts
@TIENTI0000Күн бұрын
Super Thanks
@reinerwilhelms-tricarico344Күн бұрын
Even if only one percent of the hydrogen and helium atoms are ionised it would be a plasma. This calculation based on the Boltzmann distribution assumes that there is some equilibrium which is unlikely to exist, and you’re using with the assumption that all atoms are ionised.
@anotheryoutube4635Күн бұрын
Weird how AI scans of all the moon landings say they're 100% fake.
@skyw4278Күн бұрын
today's "ai" is not hollywood "ai". it's a language program.
@user-co7qs7yq7nКүн бұрын
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 27, 2024 the position of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 131 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the position of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the position of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the position of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the position of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
@user-co7qs7yq7nКүн бұрын
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 27, 2024 the position of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 131 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the position of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the position of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the position of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the position of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
@FiveFlysInThePieКүн бұрын
When talking about models one needs to distinguish between purely empirical models (statistical models applied to empirical data) and mathematical or physical models ( based on ‘known’ laws of physics with assumptions ) and models that combine both empirical and physics inputs). Predicting sea level rise lends itself to empirical modelling. An empirical model would predict average sea level rise of about 30cm over a century. Climate models that predict sea level rises of much greater than 30cm over a century, e.g. 1m, must be adding in modelling components based on some assumptions about things that are going to happen in the future but not yet observed. Sort of equivalent to using what you are going to prove to prove what you are going to prove.
@benu6305Күн бұрын
Interviewing AI is an art. Open questions are not helpful with ChatGPT. Tom Lausen (on a different topic) demonstrated very clearly how to deal with AI in his book " Die Untersuchung". You also have to feed this AI with data yourself and also point out that standard cosmology is full of free parameters. As far as the shape of galaxies is concerned, isn't it also a question of perspective (viewing angle) whether a galaxy appears as a bar, an ellipse or a spiral? Hannes Alvén had published groundbreaking work on galaxy formation. Not that a Nobel Prize is necessarily a reference, but he was also a Nobel Prize winner.
@benu6305Күн бұрын
KI zu befragen ist eine Kunst. Offene Fragen sind bei ChatGPT nicht zielführend. Wie mit KI umzugehen ist, hat Tom Lausen (bei einem anderen Thema) in seinem Buch "Die Untersuchung" sehr anschaulich vorgeführt. Man muß diese KI auch selbst mit Daten füttern und eben auch darauf hinweisen, daß die Standard-Kosmologie voll ist von freien Parametern. Was die Form der Galaxien betrifft; ist es nicht auch eine Frage der Perspektive (Betrachtungswinkel) ob eine Galaxie als Balken, Elipse oder Spirale erscheint? Hannes Alvén hatte zur Galaxienbildung bahnbrechende Arbeiten veröffentlicht. Nicht, daß ein Nobelpreis unbedingt eine Referenz wäre aber auch er war Nobelpreisträger.
@jaycorrales5329Күн бұрын
AI refused to discuss vsl, that was annoying. For example, what is the speed of gravity if it should all be constant and warp space time?
@ernestdempsey9441Күн бұрын
Being the doubting Thomas (or doubting Ernest), I wonder how much the AI programming itself would be manipulated by the human hand that is trained to selectively process data (and omit data they don't want to process) to arrive at the desired results.
@skyw4278Күн бұрын
people are finding these Ai are "left leaning" almost socialist.
@mydogbrian4814Күн бұрын
- As someone who bad mouth's *Tyson* for wasting too much effort on explaining Junior High science to the hopelessly ignorant (e.g. *Joe Rogan Pod Casts* ). I agree with his thinking on this subject. - It is not Physicists fault that we have stumbled on a vast desert in probing nature at present energy probing levels. Although nothing mind shatering has been found. It all vindicated a large block of current conjectures on our understanding of reality. - Even if it does look like Swiss Cheese in our Ham & cheese club sandwich, it does serves its purpose. Yum yum! (Would no holes Cheddar be a better choice?) - However I commend you for bringing out these facts that do have their merits. - Is the right foot more important in walking? Or is it the left? To get you to your desired destination?
@FiveFlysInThePieКүн бұрын
I don’t think AI is really artificial intelligence. It can recall data from a massive depository of data but it would still need to use models of some sort to analyse the data. The models will be no better than existing models and might therefore be an incorrect model that it chooses. AI could only at best duplicate left hemisphere brain operation. There is no right hemisphere AI equivalent to act iteratively to question the ‘left hemisphere’ AI model. A good data analyst wouldn’t be intimidated by the quantity of data. Bayesian analysis would be a preferred choice. Even the best data analysts would need input from open minded cosmologists and be prepared to rethink standard approaches to data analysis. AI would not cut it at this stage.
@xxxYYZxxxКүн бұрын
Dark energy is the constant function of a growing size ratio between system and content, this being the "Occam's razor" explanation not requiring any adjustments to the speed of light. Dark Matter has a similar explanation, but at the galactic scale. The main issue of Cosmology isn't Physical, but Metaphysical, namely: the "self-containment" of reality by reality being synonymous with "self description" of reality by reality, which is precisely "conscious perception".
@meow75714Күн бұрын
Funny you talk as if European physics had this tradition of deep physical thinking..... forgetting that in just 1800s, atomic theory was highly unpopular in your country of Germany/Prussia, that Ludwig Boltzman had to commit suicide.
@Valerii_PivovarovКүн бұрын
Лектор, видимо, не знает, что для физиков (физико-математики отдыхают) постоянная тонкой структуры является простым и понятным параметром, который определяет отношение гравитационного радиуса к электромагнитному для конкретного потенциального поля. Подробнее об этом во внятной и доступной даже школьникам форме здесь: kzread.info/dash/bejne/impouKqcka2an8o.html
@Valerii_PivovarovКүн бұрын
Лектор, видимо, не знает, что для физиков (физико-математики отдыхают) постоянная тонкой структуры является простым и понятным параметром, который определяет отношение гравитационного радиуса к электромагнитному для конкретного потенциального поля. Подробнее об этом во внятной и доступной даже школьникам форме здесь: kzread.info/dash/bejne/impouKqcka2an8o.html
@99guspuppet8Күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ the ducks THE DUCKS ! !
@arthurrobey4945Күн бұрын
Humans and artificial intelligence are still subject to GIGO. Neither modus can escape the popular but false models, but if Artificial Intelligence is truly ego free, it Might be able to make headway against the infinite chasm of the unknown.
@BlackMasterRoshi2 күн бұрын
nice, thanks
@P-B-G_YT2 күн бұрын
There is no Dark Matter or Dark Energy. They miscalculated the mass of the earth. It's only a fraction of what they say it is. That will affect every other body they look at in the universe and how it really reacts to everything around it.
@WilliamLious2 күн бұрын
They could make the presumption that distant objects that look the same as close objects are the same: in energy output and size. Then see what comes out of that?
@The_Green_Man_OAP2 күн бұрын
I find it useful generally with physics problems, but best double check any maths they do because they seem too eager to please. I even had an AI lie to me using fictious history (about 'Maxwell Gravity') to justify its argument! It claimed that Maxwell used spacetime with his theory about gravity, which is, of course, nonsense!
@walterbrownstone80172 күн бұрын
People love artificial flavors and colors and they are so good for you. How about you just stop hiding experimental data from the public? You get your money from the government literally robbing the public and you don't even share the data. Artificial intelligence is absolutely perfect for it's ability to delete humanity from the equation.
@thenextpoetician63282 күн бұрын
In Star Trek terms (whether I'm repeating myself) AI is both the Borg and the ship's computer. Pick a side. In this world, the ruling class of psychos is in charge, so good luck making AI work for anything that doesn't suit their purposes. The bad guys started the university system and it has obviously worked for them and against the sheeple. Anyway, it's GIGO, so whatever ...
@stevenverrall45272 күн бұрын
Hopefully this video inspires more high school physics teachers to think deeply and not merely completely submit to drinking all of the mainstream coolaid. Fundamental physics breakthroughs involving high-school level math are waiting to be discovered...
@shockwave3262 күн бұрын
99.9% of the universe is plasma and that plasma carries charge everywhere in the universe,,,, everything in the universe is charge and charged,,,, the so called smart people who run the MOTHER of the sciences wont even consider the universe IS electric and that proof is the magnetics seen EVERYWHERE in the universe they look yes the cosmic web has a magnetic signature or how else would we know it exists ? galaxies sitting 90 Degrees(right hand rule of electricity) to their filament(birkeland current) yes the cosmic web is filamentary pairs of twisting filaments of plasma Hannes Alfvén then halton arp all think the universe is not as described to us by the cosmologists the ELECTRIC UNIVERSE offers us the best interpretation of how things really work out there and in there as well electrons measured in volts atoms the solar wind your body's PH all electric !!!!!!
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time2 күн бұрын
We do have a lot of data, it can't have been another time in history when we had so much info!
@robbolastname67992 күн бұрын
you put so much faith in "AI" .... what they provide as "AI" today can only find the answers it's told to find. Classifying galaxies, sure, train a 6 year old one-by-one for each classification and if you feed it the examples you used to train it it would agree with you, feed it data of another it hasn't seen before, good luck, or you could sit down and train it for that one. Don't get sucked in by the hype, "AI" really is not what you think it is.
@erickallage2 күн бұрын
the field of AI and analytics overlap tremendously, machine learning is under the umbrella of ai but has a big problem of "framing" and bias. i have no doubt that if these datapoints were set in a large vector database and k nearest neighbor calculations done, some of what was mentioned in the video could be done, as well as support vector analysis. i think the question is if the framing of the result is what you wanted, arguably you may get almost infinite scope of categorical data, which isnt useful. richness of the data is another question. but i think when it comes to data science its the superstition that ai needs to deal with rather than superstition in ai.
@xxxYYZxxxКүн бұрын
Artificial = Fake. Intelligence = News.
@user-ys4cy6jw1v2 күн бұрын
They neglected surface tension of water and possibly between particles.
@xephyr4172 күн бұрын
Spinors are little aether vortices. I think they are the shankar monopole, but im not sure yet.
@xephyr4172 күн бұрын
9:43 this is the image ive been fantasizing about. I told myself "when i find it, ill know I'm on the right path." Gonna go read your papers.
@navpreetsinghnoorie19422 күн бұрын
Great Video. Please allow me to ask a silly question... So, are we saying that if there is only ONE earth and No other matter in the universe, THEN will the water curve in the rotating bucket or not? It won't?!!!
@haroonrasheed38443 күн бұрын
If inifities were indeed replaced arbitrarily by quantities as Dirac and co claim, how can QED possibly be true?
@deandeann15413 күн бұрын
There are gigantic natural particle colliders, far larger and more powerful than any we could ever build, out there in the night sky waiting to be studied. I think that there is more to be learned if we spend our research money on more advanced telescopes to study the sky rather than on what are essentially huge subatomic microscopes to study particles here on Earth.
@TheLastOutlaw2893 күн бұрын
Remember guys the first priests were scientists 😂
@oakhillclassroom48273 күн бұрын
Bless those Men upholding TRUTH
@mydogbrian48144 күн бұрын
> So dumbing down all of this to the layman level. What are you saying about gravity? That it's a composite effect of all the mass in the universe effect on itself. And if so. What is the mechanism of transmission? The long lost graviton?
@samlazar10534 күн бұрын
By the time write brothers first took of in a plane...Konstantin Tsiolkovsky was dreaming about Space exploration and SATELLITES. Elon Mosk recently eluded to that fact when he congratulated Konstantin Tsilovky on his birthday
Пікірлер
AI (what we call AI) can help detect common data patterns which are not immediately evident to the human data mining. It is incredible how what we - for years - have called "Data Mining" and "Data Analysis" are now been merged together, and called "Artificial Intelligence". With the "Data Training" being no more than an overextended calculation of matrix differentiation. It is incredible how far this system is from true intelligence, which is a biphasic operation of "Invent and choose". Best Regards, dear Prof. Unzicker... Greetings, Anthony
Why did the string theorist cross the road? To get to the 10th dimension. Where did the string theorist hide from the experimentalist? Inside a gravitational singularity. Who did the string theorist buy a new particle accelerator for? Sweet SUSY. How many string theorists does it take to change a light bulb? 10 to the 500th power.
He said himself to be just an ordinary guy.
particle physics is done. it works. unless there is new theories to test, i dont think its a good idea.
Has there been a greater waste of money than building the large hadron collider?
Excellent ! Thank you for this spotlight.
What physicists need to understand, is that mathematics is just a tool to understand and work with nature. Somewhere in the last century it has been made primary. This can only lead to false conclusions. And it has, plenty of them.
This further proves the earth is flat...
Sir I wish you can write a book or at least do a video on scientific thinking
What we have now is q perversion Not a Koperinkan method. Speculations and guesswork not testability
thank you. keep questioning these fundamental scientific 'assumptions' that everyone quotes as facts
Super Thanks
Even if only one percent of the hydrogen and helium atoms are ionised it would be a plasma. This calculation based on the Boltzmann distribution assumes that there is some equilibrium which is unlikely to exist, and you’re using with the assumption that all atoms are ionised.
Weird how AI scans of all the moon landings say they're 100% fake.
today's "ai" is not hollywood "ai". it's a language program.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 27, 2024 the position of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 131 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the position of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the position of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the position of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the position of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 27, 2024 the position of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 131 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the position of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the position of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the position of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the position of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
When talking about models one needs to distinguish between purely empirical models (statistical models applied to empirical data) and mathematical or physical models ( based on ‘known’ laws of physics with assumptions ) and models that combine both empirical and physics inputs). Predicting sea level rise lends itself to empirical modelling. An empirical model would predict average sea level rise of about 30cm over a century. Climate models that predict sea level rises of much greater than 30cm over a century, e.g. 1m, must be adding in modelling components based on some assumptions about things that are going to happen in the future but not yet observed. Sort of equivalent to using what you are going to prove to prove what you are going to prove.
Interviewing AI is an art. Open questions are not helpful with ChatGPT. Tom Lausen (on a different topic) demonstrated very clearly how to deal with AI in his book " Die Untersuchung". You also have to feed this AI with data yourself and also point out that standard cosmology is full of free parameters. As far as the shape of galaxies is concerned, isn't it also a question of perspective (viewing angle) whether a galaxy appears as a bar, an ellipse or a spiral? Hannes Alvén had published groundbreaking work on galaxy formation. Not that a Nobel Prize is necessarily a reference, but he was also a Nobel Prize winner.
KI zu befragen ist eine Kunst. Offene Fragen sind bei ChatGPT nicht zielführend. Wie mit KI umzugehen ist, hat Tom Lausen (bei einem anderen Thema) in seinem Buch "Die Untersuchung" sehr anschaulich vorgeführt. Man muß diese KI auch selbst mit Daten füttern und eben auch darauf hinweisen, daß die Standard-Kosmologie voll ist von freien Parametern. Was die Form der Galaxien betrifft; ist es nicht auch eine Frage der Perspektive (Betrachtungswinkel) ob eine Galaxie als Balken, Elipse oder Spirale erscheint? Hannes Alvén hatte zur Galaxienbildung bahnbrechende Arbeiten veröffentlicht. Nicht, daß ein Nobelpreis unbedingt eine Referenz wäre aber auch er war Nobelpreisträger.
AI refused to discuss vsl, that was annoying. For example, what is the speed of gravity if it should all be constant and warp space time?
Being the doubting Thomas (or doubting Ernest), I wonder how much the AI programming itself would be manipulated by the human hand that is trained to selectively process data (and omit data they don't want to process) to arrive at the desired results.
people are finding these Ai are "left leaning" almost socialist.
- As someone who bad mouth's *Tyson* for wasting too much effort on explaining Junior High science to the hopelessly ignorant (e.g. *Joe Rogan Pod Casts* ). I agree with his thinking on this subject. - It is not Physicists fault that we have stumbled on a vast desert in probing nature at present energy probing levels. Although nothing mind shatering has been found. It all vindicated a large block of current conjectures on our understanding of reality. - Even if it does look like Swiss Cheese in our Ham & cheese club sandwich, it does serves its purpose. Yum yum! (Would no holes Cheddar be a better choice?) - However I commend you for bringing out these facts that do have their merits. - Is the right foot more important in walking? Or is it the left? To get you to your desired destination?
I don’t think AI is really artificial intelligence. It can recall data from a massive depository of data but it would still need to use models of some sort to analyse the data. The models will be no better than existing models and might therefore be an incorrect model that it chooses. AI could only at best duplicate left hemisphere brain operation. There is no right hemisphere AI equivalent to act iteratively to question the ‘left hemisphere’ AI model. A good data analyst wouldn’t be intimidated by the quantity of data. Bayesian analysis would be a preferred choice. Even the best data analysts would need input from open minded cosmologists and be prepared to rethink standard approaches to data analysis. AI would not cut it at this stage.
Dark energy is the constant function of a growing size ratio between system and content, this being the "Occam's razor" explanation not requiring any adjustments to the speed of light. Dark Matter has a similar explanation, but at the galactic scale. The main issue of Cosmology isn't Physical, but Metaphysical, namely: the "self-containment" of reality by reality being synonymous with "self description" of reality by reality, which is precisely "conscious perception".
Funny you talk as if European physics had this tradition of deep physical thinking..... forgetting that in just 1800s, atomic theory was highly unpopular in your country of Germany/Prussia, that Ludwig Boltzman had to commit suicide.
Лектор, видимо, не знает, что для физиков (физико-математики отдыхают) постоянная тонкой структуры является простым и понятным параметром, который определяет отношение гравитационного радиуса к электромагнитному для конкретного потенциального поля. Подробнее об этом во внятной и доступной даже школьникам форме здесь: kzread.info/dash/bejne/impouKqcka2an8o.html
Лектор, видимо, не знает, что для физиков (физико-математики отдыхают) постоянная тонкой структуры является простым и понятным параметром, который определяет отношение гравитационного радиуса к электромагнитному для конкретного потенциального поля. Подробнее об этом во внятной и доступной даже школьникам форме здесь: kzread.info/dash/bejne/impouKqcka2an8o.html
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ the ducks THE DUCKS ! !
Humans and artificial intelligence are still subject to GIGO. Neither modus can escape the popular but false models, but if Artificial Intelligence is truly ego free, it Might be able to make headway against the infinite chasm of the unknown.
nice, thanks
There is no Dark Matter or Dark Energy. They miscalculated the mass of the earth. It's only a fraction of what they say it is. That will affect every other body they look at in the universe and how it really reacts to everything around it.
They could make the presumption that distant objects that look the same as close objects are the same: in energy output and size. Then see what comes out of that?
I find it useful generally with physics problems, but best double check any maths they do because they seem too eager to please. I even had an AI lie to me using fictious history (about 'Maxwell Gravity') to justify its argument! It claimed that Maxwell used spacetime with his theory about gravity, which is, of course, nonsense!
People love artificial flavors and colors and they are so good for you. How about you just stop hiding experimental data from the public? You get your money from the government literally robbing the public and you don't even share the data. Artificial intelligence is absolutely perfect for it's ability to delete humanity from the equation.
In Star Trek terms (whether I'm repeating myself) AI is both the Borg and the ship's computer. Pick a side. In this world, the ruling class of psychos is in charge, so good luck making AI work for anything that doesn't suit their purposes. The bad guys started the university system and it has obviously worked for them and against the sheeple. Anyway, it's GIGO, so whatever ...
Hopefully this video inspires more high school physics teachers to think deeply and not merely completely submit to drinking all of the mainstream coolaid. Fundamental physics breakthroughs involving high-school level math are waiting to be discovered...
99.9% of the universe is plasma and that plasma carries charge everywhere in the universe,,,, everything in the universe is charge and charged,,,, the so called smart people who run the MOTHER of the sciences wont even consider the universe IS electric and that proof is the magnetics seen EVERYWHERE in the universe they look yes the cosmic web has a magnetic signature or how else would we know it exists ? galaxies sitting 90 Degrees(right hand rule of electricity) to their filament(birkeland current) yes the cosmic web is filamentary pairs of twisting filaments of plasma Hannes Alfvén then halton arp all think the universe is not as described to us by the cosmologists the ELECTRIC UNIVERSE offers us the best interpretation of how things really work out there and in there as well electrons measured in volts atoms the solar wind your body's PH all electric !!!!!!
We do have a lot of data, it can't have been another time in history when we had so much info!
you put so much faith in "AI" .... what they provide as "AI" today can only find the answers it's told to find. Classifying galaxies, sure, train a 6 year old one-by-one for each classification and if you feed it the examples you used to train it it would agree with you, feed it data of another it hasn't seen before, good luck, or you could sit down and train it for that one. Don't get sucked in by the hype, "AI" really is not what you think it is.
the field of AI and analytics overlap tremendously, machine learning is under the umbrella of ai but has a big problem of "framing" and bias. i have no doubt that if these datapoints were set in a large vector database and k nearest neighbor calculations done, some of what was mentioned in the video could be done, as well as support vector analysis. i think the question is if the framing of the result is what you wanted, arguably you may get almost infinite scope of categorical data, which isnt useful. richness of the data is another question. but i think when it comes to data science its the superstition that ai needs to deal with rather than superstition in ai.
Artificial = Fake. Intelligence = News.
They neglected surface tension of water and possibly between particles.
Spinors are little aether vortices. I think they are the shankar monopole, but im not sure yet.
9:43 this is the image ive been fantasizing about. I told myself "when i find it, ill know I'm on the right path." Gonna go read your papers.
Great Video. Please allow me to ask a silly question... So, are we saying that if there is only ONE earth and No other matter in the universe, THEN will the water curve in the rotating bucket or not? It won't?!!!
If inifities were indeed replaced arbitrarily by quantities as Dirac and co claim, how can QED possibly be true?
There are gigantic natural particle colliders, far larger and more powerful than any we could ever build, out there in the night sky waiting to be studied. I think that there is more to be learned if we spend our research money on more advanced telescopes to study the sky rather than on what are essentially huge subatomic microscopes to study particles here on Earth.
Remember guys the first priests were scientists 😂
Bless those Men upholding TRUTH
> So dumbing down all of this to the layman level. What are you saying about gravity? That it's a composite effect of all the mass in the universe effect on itself. And if so. What is the mechanism of transmission? The long lost graviton?
By the time write brothers first took of in a plane...Konstantin Tsiolkovsky was dreaming about Space exploration and SATELLITES. Elon Mosk recently eluded to that fact when he congratulated Konstantin Tsilovky on his birthday