The Antique Airshow

The Antique Airshow

Hi, I'm Jarryd, the creator of Antique Airshow. Welcome to the Antique Airshow where we fly through aviation history to uncover the stories of the pilots and aircraft of yesteryears.

Since a little boy, I've been fascinated by powered flight. Watching the 1969 classic movie,' The Battle of Britain', as a 6-year-old captivated my imagination. Ever since my passion for historic aircraft and aviation in general has only grown. Now into my early twenties, I spend significant time reading and investigating these topics and it has turned from an interest into a true passion.

The Antique Airshow was set up in an effort to share to as many people as possible the facts of both famous and lesser-known aircraft and their related stories .The videos are purposely kept to short, so that people don't have to sit down and watch a full feature documentary, instead being able to watch and learn on the go.

So subscribe, strap in and join me on this exciting journey.
✈️✈️

Пікірлер

  • @JayStewart-ds9pn
    @JayStewart-ds9pn19 сағат бұрын

    You need to credit Jack Frye (TWA) for his letter to Donald Douglas that started the DC-3 legacy!

  • @misterwhipple2870
    @misterwhipple28702 күн бұрын

    That's Handley - P A I G E , old chap . . .

  • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
    @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn39353 күн бұрын

    Did it have fixed pitch propellers? A huge performance factor.

  • @captaccordion
    @captaccordion4 күн бұрын

    Thanks Tomato Eins. I didn't know much about these, and you've beaten the other aviation channels to it.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowКүн бұрын

    No problem 👍✈️

  • @zig_ziggy
    @zig_ziggy4 күн бұрын

    Thank you for uploading this interesting video. I had never before heard of the Harrow.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow4 күн бұрын

    No problem. It is a rather hidden design and one that I hadn't heard of until a few months ago 👍✈️

  • @QuizmasterLaw
    @QuizmasterLaw4 күн бұрын

    This is an amazingly well detailed video, thank you for making it. Though I know the British "Red Devils" at Arnhem were essentially cut off, surrounded, and mauled by an SS Panzer division refitting I've yet to see a definitive youtube video on that topic, which I do think worthy of military study. Hopefully operations room or kings and generals will do that someday.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowКүн бұрын

    Thank you 👍✈️ That would be an interesting video, perhaps a little out of the realm of what I do here, but hopefully one of the other channels does it soon.

  • @ivancho5854
    @ivancho58544 күн бұрын

    A very interesting video of a really well proportioned plane, particularly the Sparrow. It just looks right. I'm guessing, but I suspect that she handled well and helped train pilots for large aircraft. I wasn't aware of their role in air-to-air refueling. Thanks. 👍

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow4 күн бұрын

    Thanks 👍✈️ I agree especially considered next to other big bombers of the time period. I'm not sure about how well it handled, but it does look rather stable.

  • @letsseeif
    @letsseeif6 күн бұрын

    The Harrow was an an interesting inter war bomber. I learnt to fly in 1957 and have the full supply of 'Aircraft of The Fighting Powers' and magazines re aircraft since I was a boy.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow5 күн бұрын

    It sure is and has quite an interesting history behind it too. Nice that's awesome, no doubt a great collection to have 👍✈️

  • @bryanewyatt
    @bryanewyatt6 күн бұрын

    Wow...an aircraft type I've genuinely never heard of! Nice to learn something new 😊

  • @jimroberts3009
    @jimroberts30095 күн бұрын

    Knew about this aircraft already. These and many other inter war RAF bomber/transport aircraft were bizarre ungainly looking beasts.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow5 күн бұрын

    To be honest I hadn't come across until a few months ago. It is quite an interesting machine. Thats great 👍✈️

  • @UncleJoeLITE
    @UncleJoeLITE6 күн бұрын

    Pretty bloody early in the morning lol.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow5 күн бұрын

    Haha yes it sure was. While I sometimes are up finishing videos at that time, I had finished and uploaded this during the week, with it being scheduled to drop at midnight. So I was fast asleep when this was released 😅

  • @williammedford3661
    @williammedford366113 күн бұрын

    Coffin with wings

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow9 күн бұрын

    In many ways it was. It was only ever a one way trip with them.

  • @ronmorgan8214
    @ronmorgan821413 күн бұрын

    balsa glider?

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow9 күн бұрын

    I believe balsa wood was only partially used. Other woods were also utilized

  • @stephengarrity9702
    @stephengarrity970216 күн бұрын

    My dad flew in one as a navigator, RCAF, and was shot down in the Netherlands close to the German border in June 1944, and was the only crew to survive. He spent three months with the resistance, successfully evading German forces, to arrive in London in September 1944.

  • @RideAcrossTheRiver
    @RideAcrossTheRiver23 күн бұрын

    Assigned to a Beaufighter? Has it dihedral tailplane? Yes? WHEW!

  • @alynicholas3459
    @alynicholas345924 күн бұрын

    Loved the involvement of the community in the video.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow22 күн бұрын

    👍✈

  • @richardbanker3910
    @richardbanker391025 күн бұрын

    Beaufighters and Mosquitos were both very fine twin engined multi functioned aircraft. Hard to choose between the two. Probably the Beaufighter was more rugged

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow23 күн бұрын

    Indeed they were. Both valuable to the Allies

  • @garywithers852
    @garywithers85226 күн бұрын

    The most British plane ever. Designed and built under cement grey skies, and eternal drizzle, couldn't handle the tropical climate. The local fuel probably gave it the runs.

  • @UncleJoeLITE
    @UncleJoeLITE29 күн бұрын

    Just found this somehow! I'll check your back catalogue. Cheers from Canberra _just around the corner from the AWM lol._

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow23 күн бұрын

    Awesome, thanks 👍✈

  • @richarddixon7276
    @richarddixon727629 күн бұрын

    Wow , for some reason I have not been getting notifications of Your videos , I checked , still subscribed with notifications So ? , Hopefully now I'll start getting them again .

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow22 күн бұрын

    That is strange, fingers crossed they start appearing again 👍✈

  • @richarddixon7276
    @richarddixon727619 күн бұрын

    @@AntiqueAirshow I just got this now , according to the date stamp You posted it 3 days ago !? , It must be Gremlins messing with the gubbins & the algorithms . Fingers crossed its just a blip .

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow14 күн бұрын

    @@richarddixon7276 That is rather strange indeed. Hopefully, fingers crossed 👍✈

  • @iansands8607
    @iansands860729 күн бұрын

    Great video. As much as I like the De Havilland Mosquito, for me the Bristol Beaufighter pips it to the post, I just love it's brutal looks and it never gets the recognition it truly deserves.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshow22 күн бұрын

    Thanks. They were both quite important aircraft 👍✈

  • @ianbell5611
    @ianbell5611Ай бұрын

    Very good. Cheers

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Thank you 👍✈️

  • @johnblackstock4092
    @johnblackstock4092Ай бұрын

    Some 40 years back I had a friend who was serving at the Point Cook Air Base. On one our family get together at the air base, he invited me to see there museum. My understanding was the museum was run volunteer Raff Personnel. Anyway they had a big display of Manfred Von Richthofen, artifacts. They had his Machine-Gun Interrupter Gear, altitude meter and several other pieces. There was some Photographs 16 by 24 Inches photographs, of deceased Manfred. As a Photographer I instantly recognized the photos came from Pro 4 by 5 Inch Press camera. The photographs must have been printed on base in there Photographic division form “Original 4 by 5 inch Negatives”. Last year when I went to the Point Cook Air Base museum, I did not see the Richthofen artifacts on display. The RAAF Base Point Cook at 480-490 Point Cook Rd, Point Cook VIC 3030, is a free entry, though you have to apply for a pass on the internet. This takes about a week. Remembering the artifacts that were kept at Point Cook, I believe they were serenaded to the Museum from families from the Footscray and Williamstown area, after their Serving Ancestor had died. I guess it’s the same way Moorabbin, got there petrol tank.

  • @gunshipgray4295
    @gunshipgray4295Ай бұрын

    One Fokker DR 1 did survive World War I ….and was in the aviation Museum in Berlin until it was destroyed in a bombing raid in 1943 during World War II.

  • @janblake9468
    @janblake9468Ай бұрын

    Our local airport, in Fullerton CA, had a Ford trimotor, a replica I believe, based there many years ago. I saw it often. Alas, it later crashed during a take off. Veering left. it crashed on a the major street next to the airport.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    That would have been interesting to see, although a very tragic end

  • @mattyplayz5589
    @mattyplayz5589Ай бұрын

    it makes me proud that i live in bahrain to the place where concorde landed the first time but i didnt exist back then :(

  • @Hushey
    @HusheyАй бұрын

    this is an interesting video! im glad i came across it. However - from an entertainment perspective i feel like a couple of things are missing I love the story of the plane you set out to tell and achieved, but it often feels like some elements were glossed over. "the engine fell off" ok tell me more what was the human impact, did this land in a city or the ocean? what happened to the plane after it landed? also i would love if you displayed the movie in question and discuss accuracies and inaccuracies in the movie compared to real life and maybe share some insight on how it was filmed? a bit more like at the 10 minute mark - just elaborate more on things. the talking to camera video clips look a bit strange, almost like theres water on the lense or something? not sure but thought i should let you know. the image here isnt coming through clear best wishes for you and the channel. keep improving and keep going!

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Thanks, they are some good points you raise. Unfortunately, some points have to be glossed over due to time constraints. I try and fit as much in as possible but am also weary of going to0 long. There is also sometimes (as was the case here) where sources are few and details light. Lack of sources and available information is also why there was a lack of discussion about the behind the scenes of the film. I searched quite hard but found details about the aircraft to be rather lacking. The behind the scenes doco of the film rarely mentions it and there are few webpages out there. Thats good to know about the image quality. I have a pretty low-key production setup consisting of a gopro and tripod. I do plan on eventually upgrading it. Thank you for the feedback though, it's all valuable. This video format and content is still new to the channel and I'm still working out the best way to deliver these videos, so it's good to get some feedback on it. Thanks 👍✈️

  • @andrewmontgomery5621
    @andrewmontgomery5621Ай бұрын

    I had a long lost uncle named Ted who was a tail gunner in one of those in No 10 Squadron but he was missing in action during a raid on Essen.

  • @davidvavra9113
    @davidvavra9113Ай бұрын

    Thank you

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    👍✈️

  • @stop-the-greed
    @stop-the-greedАй бұрын

    What ever happened to the simmson ,

  • @NonCredibleDefence
    @NonCredibleDefenceАй бұрын

    wooohoooo more indy!!! (your other content is great too!)

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    haha thank you, this one has long been overdue. Have already started work on the Last Crusade 👍✈️

  • @scotfield3950
    @scotfield3950Ай бұрын

    Skip bombing

  • @user-lg6oi8yq1c
    @user-lg6oi8yq1cАй бұрын

    My Dad was an RAF pilot on Short Stirlings , came down in the North Sea after being shot down, recovered all except the tail gunner (who often got trapped). These guys had a 50% mortality, and 76% morbidity, hoping for a better life for their kids and grandkids. Unfortunately, hate has prevailed, fueled by religion. He died 15 yrs ago before the fascist uprising in the West....I am glad he didn't live to see the shit unfolding in North America and Europe.. Fascism revisited with #SDE.

  • @kirkstinson7316
    @kirkstinson7316Ай бұрын

    The owner talking about the M3A1 scout car says US yroops didnt care gor it necause of open yop? Halftrack was the same. The armor is actually fairly thin. The thickest is yhe visor over yhe windshield and thats 1/2" sides are about a 1/4". An 8mm round might not ho threw but fors leave one hell of a crater. I owned one that i testored that was nrought in grom Greece

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Yes that it correct. Very interesting nice 👍

  • @marcbrasse747
    @marcbrasse747Ай бұрын

    A beautiful aircraft. Sleek and muscular at the same time.

  • @ianbell5611
    @ianbell5611Ай бұрын

    Very good. Guessing the roller on the front is to assist in getting over steep embankments?

  • @kirkstinson7316
    @kirkstinson7316Ай бұрын

    Ditch crossing actually. I owned one several years ago

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Thanks. I'm not overly familiar with the type so not sure.

  • @ooloncaluphid
    @ooloncaluphidАй бұрын

    The boys at Fairey really knew how to make an ugly aircraft.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    The Barracuda definitely helps the case

  • @gary24752
    @gary24752Ай бұрын

    So what is the difference between the mosquito and the Hornet?

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    The biggest is that the Mosquito had a crew of two and the Hornet was a single seat. There would be quite a few others, the hornet is smaller, but I can't think of them off the top of my head

  • @charleshouser3123
    @charleshouser3123Ай бұрын

    Attention everyone: My parents lived in the Texas town, Waco. Everyone pronounces that like Wayco. The American biplanes, Waco, however are pronounced exactly the way the presenter said: Wah-co. Congratulations to the presenter!

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Thank you for the clarification 👍✈️

  • @Belzediel
    @BelzedielАй бұрын

    ...did someone just set your voice to sarcastic and you don't know how to switch it back?

  • @wolfu597
    @wolfu597Ай бұрын

    The Beauforts nickname was "the whistling death" and for good reasons. Its standard armament consisted of: Four 20 mm autocannons in the nose, Six .303 machine guns in the wings, and one rearward operated machine gun for the observer. And the Japanese destroyers had it all thrown right into their "faces."

  • @g8ymw
    @g8ymwАй бұрын

    No, that was the (slightly) later Beaufighters Also they were known to the Japanese as "Whispering Death" on account of the sleeve valves being quieter than poppet valves (as fitted to Merlin engines) A low dive would be helped by cutting back on the throttles making it quieter still Bristol knew we would need a "heavy fighter" with range so they built the Beaufighters using adaptations of the Beaufort. They entered service just as Germany swithced to night bombing The Beaufighter (being essentially a redesigned Beaufort) had enough room on board to carry a radar unit, making it a deadly night fighter It replaced Blenheims and Beauforts in RAF Coastal Command. RAF North Cotes (and other Coastal Command bases) Beaufighters took out plenty of ships going from Norway to Germany, many carrying Swedish Iron Ore Later to be augmented and then replaced by Mosquitos

  • @michaeldoyle5136
    @michaeldoyle5136Ай бұрын

    the only AmeriKans at the Battle of Milne Bay were construction-engineers (building additional airfields) ... at Milne Bay it was the AUSTRALIANS who for the first time destroyed Japan's myth of invincibility.

  • @stephengardiner9867
    @stephengardiner9867Ай бұрын

    American aircraft companies did design better medium bombers than the British. This is a simple fact as Marylands, Baltimores, Hudsons , Venturas and Marauders flew and fought in RAF markings. This aircraft was simply unnecessary and that ventral gun/bomb aimer's position was positively archaic. The .303 guns were simply inadequate and dated. It was not a bad looking beast though.

  • @sylvaleader
    @sylvaleaderАй бұрын

    Nice video. I really think that the MK VII was one of the very best Spitfires. Not only could it climb high (and faster than most WW11 fighters), it was also the fastest merlin engined variant. The Aeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment (AAEE) at Boscombe Down tested a MKVII - serial No MD176 in September 1944 and it achieved a top speed of 412 mph at 26000 ft, 424 mph at 29400 ft, 420mph at 34000 ft and 409 mph at 40000ft. Only the Griffon engined Spitfires had better performance and I imagine not by much at those altitudes. It is a shame that they were that bit more difficult to manufacture. The MK IX could achieve most of what a MK VII could (top speed and range excepted) with only 80% of the effort as they were largely based on the less rigid MK V airframe which was easier to produce quickly. Although the MK VII looked similar to a MK IX , the MK VII was a complete redesign of the airframe and wings, making it a much stronger structure. Having said that, there were no bad Spitfires. They were all brilliant, and we were very lucky to have a aeroplane capable of so much development in a fast changing war.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Thanks 👍✈️ That is really interesting to read. The Spitfire is a great aircraft.

  • @craigmoloney4486
    @craigmoloney4486Ай бұрын

    Not pretty like it's mate the Mosquito but highly effective A real unsung legend of the war

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Very much agree 👍✈️

  • @stephengardiner9867
    @stephengardiner9867Ай бұрын

    Not a bad looking aircraft but it was conceptually obsolete when it was introduced into service. It did serve, however, but did suffer some operational difficulties. Certainly a much better and more useful derivative of the Buckingham (that ventral gondola hearkened back to the Italian's WWII S.M.Sparviero !). Better attack types were available... (think A-26) but this was immediate post war Britain. They were (a) broke and (b) desperately trying to maintain their own domestic aircraft industries and technology...to the extent of placing some rather peculiar (and usually of rather pedestrian performance) types into production. Some were winners though (DH Hornet, Hawker Sea Fury...). This would be a great subject for a 1/48 kit!

  • @kieranoconnor4334
    @kieranoconnor4334Ай бұрын

    Matter of fact with great photography and no music..........Paerfect.

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    👍✈ Thanks

  • @Ian-mj4pt
    @Ian-mj4ptАй бұрын

    One of my most liked aircraft often overlooked by other craft that were given more recognition .

  • @AntiqueAirshow
    @AntiqueAirshowАй бұрын

    Agree 👍✈️

  • @ljj808
    @ljj808Ай бұрын

    I’ve read some of the comments and am frankly astounded. I’d read that being put on a Stirling squadron was akin to committing suicide, as they were so bloody slow - the Kraut Night-fighters snapped them up. Am I wrong ??

  • @Prfdt3
    @Prfdt3Ай бұрын

    Instead of designing the Stirling with shorter wings to fit into existing hangers why didn't they make ten feet of the wing foldable like a carrier based plane?