Пікірлер

• 
  @rayhanabsolom6634 күн бұрын

  Video is terrible

• 
  @MuMu12411 күн бұрын

  MIAW RA mmade mistakes just like everyone who isnt the prophet SAW did He clealry states he didnt know tawheed and his teachers didnt know tawheed He made takfir on the ottoman rulers for seemingly no reason other than being overly zealous He made takfir on his own brother purely because his brother differed against him. His followers who called themselves wahhabis were known as ruthless bandits who terrorized makkah and madinah so much so that the ppl of makkah and madinah startved and started eating the dogs. They made takfir on hujjaaj They brought muslims into islam on the basis of giving them money and a few monthe layer declared that those muslims became kuffaar They were called the khawarij of that time and were spoken out against by scholars and ppl of knowledge He made mistakes but his dawah alhamdulilah was pure tawheed and beneficial till this day The problem today is ppl are on two spectrums Those who blindly follow the shaykh as if he never had blunders and mistakes and anyone who speaks out against his mistakes is an innovator And those who hate him based on the actions of his followrs and the saudi royal family who clearly used his dawah and influence to gain control over the hijaaz 'Ilm and knowledge is not only found on saudi Arabia.. all throught out history it has been scattered through out the world..some of the most influential, knowledgeable, pious scholars and defenders of this deen were non arab

• 
  @maanso658329 күн бұрын

  He changed it because they are brown

• 
  @QananiisaaIdrisАй бұрын

  So he just said he’s neutral and doesn’t know what to say, what’s the point of this?

• 
  @imranakatukunda5420Ай бұрын

  Poor Yasir Qhadh is struggling. Is it the American pressure to demonise Sheikh Mohammed Ibn Wahhab? What is wrong with him? Yasir Qhadh is losing it fast.

• 
  @namakubento927619 күн бұрын

  Whats wrong with MIAW? He didnt know the definition of shirk, which made him and his follower wrongly making takfeer against people who confess Lailahailallah

• 
  @imranakatukunda542019 күн бұрын

  @namakubento9276 Please give your good definition of Shirk. And also guve us his definition which you claim was wrong. We will be to learn from you

• 
  @namakubento927619 күн бұрын

  @@imranakatukunda5420 Shirk is associating Allah with others, what else could be? MIAW and his followers have wrong definition of shirk They say , seeking intercession and help from the deceased equal to worship them If seeking intercession is shirk, then everyone are mushrik, it includes you. The only difference is, we "worship" the deceased, and you worship those who still alive

• 
  @imranakatukunda542019 күн бұрын

  @namakubento9276 of course intercession to the dead is PURE SHIRK. So he was right. You are WRONG. You are not any better than catholics that intercede with the dead so-called saints Avoid shirk and worship Allah alone

• 
  @namakubento927619 күн бұрын

  @@imranakatukunda5420 If seeking intercession = associating Allah You are also mushrik Youre seeking intercession from those who are alive It means you te also associating Allah with living people Worshiping living people is not better than worshiping the deceased Youre no better than us or catholic in this matter If MIAW and his followers are right, both of us are mushrik, you and me are gonna be dweller of fire for eternity

• 
  @emptyingthecupАй бұрын

  Only people who have flawed aqida find tawassul and istigatha as shirk. When you have unsound core beliefs, as in shirk, then of course tawassal and istigatha will be seen as shirk. Not only that, but your pretensions to tawhid also demonstrate shirk. Once you have sound aqida, and thus, hold a metaphysical cosmological view of reality, then all dimensions of reality become hierarhically arranged properly. Then it all makes sense. If istigatha and tawassal are seen as shirk by you, but not asking for a doctor for help, then you are holding unsound beliefs and you need to correct you're aqida.

• 
  @anaskhatri12 ай бұрын

  RIJALUL GHAIB (A CATEGORY OF AULIA ALLAH) are slaves of Allah too, My understanding was this refers to them when I read this hadith, nevertheless it refers to seeking help entities not seen around.

• 
  @WaleeeD06Ай бұрын

  The hadith is mun9ati3.

• 
  @manmale98282 ай бұрын

  Tell me the definition of Shirk then! What were the Quraysh people doing that made the prophet and allah declare them as Mushriks?

• 
  @namakubento9276Ай бұрын

  Shirk : associating Allah with other What quraish did that made them declared as mushrik? : they were doing it, they associated Allah with someone and/or something than Him What else? whats definition of shirk other than that? What else they did that made Allah calls them as mushrik, other than that?

• 
  @manmale982820 күн бұрын

  @@namakubento9276 Did they associate Allah by words or actions? Clearly, with their actions, by invoking up on the statues of Lat, Uzza, Hubal... In their words, they were saying, "These are only intercessors and not our gods!" This means, you don't need to see someone speaking that he associates sth else with Allah. If you see him doing it, that is all!

• 
  @namakubento927620 күн бұрын

  @@manmale9828 meccan disbelievers said "theyre not our god"?, Nah, they viewed their idols as gods/deities Only wahhabists would say that way, that idol worshipers never worshiped their idols

• 
  @manmale982820 күн бұрын

  ​@@namakubento9276 Surah Yunus (10:18): وَيَعْبُدُونَ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ مَا لَا يَضُرُّهُمْ وَلَا يَنفَعُهُمْ وَيَقُولُونَ هَـٰٓؤُلَآءِ شُفَعَـٰٓؤُنَا عِندَ ٱللَّهِ قُلْ أَتُنَبِّـُٔونَ ٱللَّهَ بِمَا لَا يَعْلَمُ فِى ٱلسَّمَـٰوَاتِ وَلَا فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ سُبْحَـٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَـٰلَىٰ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ "And they worship besides Allah things that neither harm them nor benefit them, and they say, 'These are our intercessors with Allah.' Say, 'Do you inform Allah of something He does not know in the heavens or on the earth?' Exalted is He and high above what they associate with Him." Surah Yunus: verse 10

• 
  @manmale982820 күн бұрын

  ​@@namakubento9276 To say someone is gonna kill you, you don't have to wait for a him to say he will kill you. If he says "No, I am not gonna kill you. I am just trying to test my new gun!", he is your killer. Actions speak more than mouths. Trying to complicate Quranic verses to fit with your selfish interests is another topic...

• 
  @warababeser12 ай бұрын

  "Najdi Dawa"?? why not just call it "Wahabism" Good to see you get your senses back. But I reccomend you hasten to the truth faster.

• 
  @shaheenparvez49362 ай бұрын

  Yasir is misguided person and he is misguiding the people

• 
  @muhammadikrama92862 ай бұрын

  If this is not shirk then nothing is.

• 
  @sabetsrs41802 ай бұрын

  According to the ending of Dr Yasir Qadhi, Shirk says Hi guys I am coming 😄😄😄

• 
  @serk19333 ай бұрын

  kzread.info/dash/bejne/inan2tGddZneZcY.htmlsi=GKxDVZuKot6MuLjg

• 
  @muratsen24 ай бұрын

  kzread.info/dash/bejne/c31nlLGDdMWtgso.htmlsi=zsHStKpvHL-mhqwa

• 
  @muratsen24 ай бұрын

  Very nice

• 
  @webmasterepm4 ай бұрын

  kzread.info/dash/bejne/f4iemKacoMXAc6Q.htmlsi=unlxAmB6nIeyHSvs

• 
  @Ghiyassudin5 ай бұрын

  Nabī ﷺ said, ❝If you lose something or if you want a helper and you are in such a place where you don’t find anyone to help then one should say, ❛Help me, O Servants of Allāh! Help me, O Servants of Allāh!❜ As there are servants of Allāh whom we do not see.❞ This is recorded by Ţabarānī in Mújam al-Kabīr from Útbah ibn Ghazwān, after which he states: ❝That has been acted upon.❞ [Vol. 17, pp. 117-118] RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝If your mount flees in the desert, then call out, ❛Stop it, O servants of Allāh!❜ For Allāh has present those who will stop it.❞ ‎This is recorded by Ibn al-Sunnī in Ámal al-Yawm wa’l Laylah from Ibn Masúūd. ‎[pp. 303-304] RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝When there befalls a difficulty upon you in travel, then he should call, ❛Help, servants of Allāh!❜❞ ‎This is recorded by Bazzār in his Musnad and Ibn Abī Shaybah in his Muşannaf, from Ibn Ábbās. ‎[Vol. 10, pg 155] Imām Abu’l Ĥasan Nūruddīn Álī al-Shāfiýī al-Haythamī [735-807 AH / 1335-1405 CE] records the same narration in Majmá al-Zawāyid wa Manbá al-Fawāyid and then writes: ❝It’s narrators are thiqāt [trustworthy].❞ [Vol 10, pp. 138-139] These narrations all strengthen one another and so they are accepted, furthermore the fact that scholars acted upon them also demonstrates this. Now, it may be asked, who exactly are these servants of Allāh whom we are told to seek help from? Mullā Álī ibn Sulţān al-Qārī al-Ĥanafī [d. 1014 AH / 1605 CE] writes in Ĥirz al-Thamīn, regarding the meaning of ❝O servants of Allāh❞: ❝The intended is the Angels, or the Muslims from the Jinn, or Rijāl al-Ghayb, who are named the Abdāl.❞ Muĥammad ibn Álī al-Shawkānī [1173-1255 AH / 1759-1839 CE], whom the Wahābīs take from, writes in Tuĥfah al-Dhākirīn: ❝In the Ĥadīth there is evidence of the permissibility of Istiáānah [seeking help] with those whom a person does not see from among the servants of Allāh, from the Angels and the righteous Jinn, and there is no harm in that, just as it is permissible for a person to seek help from Banī Ādam if his mount becomes unmanageable or runs loose.❞ [pg. 202] ‎Ábdullāh ibn Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal states: ❝I heard my father saying: I performed Ĥajj five times, twice riding and thrice on foot, or twice on foot and thrice riding. Once when I was on foot, I lost the way, so I began to say, ❛Show me the way, O servants of Allāh!❜ I kept repeating this until I was back on track.❞ [Masāyil Imām Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal, pg. 245] Imam Yaĥyā Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī al-Shāfiýī [631-676 AH / 1233-1277 CE] writes in Adkhār, after quoting the second narration: ❝I say: One of our great Shaykhs in īlm narrated to me, he lost his riding beast, I think it was a mule, and he knew this Ĥadīth, so he said it, thus Allāh brought it to him immediately. I was once with a group, and my animal fled and they failed to find it, so I said it, thus I found it immediately without any means besides this statement.❞ [pg. 192] Thus we see that these narrations are accepted and acted upon.

• 
  @imdaadhusnat94055 ай бұрын

  link full video plz

• 
  @subhankhan75145 ай бұрын

  Dua is ibadah Ibadah is only for Allah So dua to anyone is shirk Isn't it? So anyone in the 1200 year of islam not acknowledge this (except ibn taymiyya and ibn qayyim rahimaullah) but after ibn abd al wahab Dua's "Definition" in both situation is different in first one allah is independent in second one the one asked is not independent of allah (correction- no alim i know (who says it's permissible) call saying ya Nabi madad is dua) (Many if not all salafi ulama define saying ya Nabi madad as dua ) 2-Quraish of mecca were same, as someone asking prophet today They don't acknowledge that quraish were of the view that Allah has full power but Allah has "GIVEN" his power "COMPLETELY" and now is not interested in human beings except the pious or his daughter (quraish have kind of this aqeedah) nauzubillah This is shirk Understand you are not the only one who has understood deen of Allah and no one before you have known it Understand this when you hear argument of both side the black and white picture of shirk atleast become somewhat grey This is one of the reasons many scholars call it haram but not shirk. May Allah guide us

• 
  @nsayyed54693 ай бұрын

  No one makes dua other than Allah it's your kizb on muslims even show that Barelvi fatawa that say doing dua other than Allah is not shirk

• 
  @subhankhan75143 ай бұрын

  @@nsayyed5469 Exactly this was my point that Barelvi ulama say saying ya Nabi madad isn't dua But this same act is called dua by salafi ulama So, different defination give different conclusions

• 
  @namakubento927619 күн бұрын

  ​@@subhankhan7514 those salafi say that asking help and worship are the same thing But, they re also seeking help from living creature Which means theyre also mushriks according to their own standard

• 
  @mohammadiaa5 ай бұрын

  "Shaykh" Yasir

• 
  @shokzz15325 ай бұрын

  Abu bakr said: whoever worshipped Muhammad then Muhammad is dead.

• 
  @rehanriaz6205 ай бұрын

  It's SHIRK!!!!!! End OF

• 
  @ibnMuharis.6 ай бұрын

  the uncles of the Prophet ﷺ literally fought against him and spread rumors and lies about him to the point where his tribe boycotted him and the Muslims.. does that discredit him?

• 
  @ReturningBackToAl-Haqq5 ай бұрын

  Yasir Qadhi does Kufr and allowed Shirk. Shaykh Mohammad Ibn Abdul Wahab (رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ) only has Tawheed, Ayahs and Hadeeth in his Books. He never takfir anyone beside Quburis, Mushirkeen and Kuffar. Look at Al Qawaid Al Arba, it doesn't have Quotes of him, only Ayahs and Hadeeth. Also, Shaykh Suleiman made an Sharh of Kitab At Tawheed. Either, Shaykh Suleiman retracted this or it was attributed falsely. Allah wages War against People who critized an Wali of him.

• 
  @ReturningRuh27 күн бұрын

  Didn’t know MIAW was like the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم

• 
  @ibnMuharis.26 күн бұрын

  Not comparing anyone to the Prophet ﷺ . Both of their messages were a call to Tawheed and abandon shirk. The responses were similar to them both: slandering against them, misunderstanding what they were saying, and falsely interpreting their positions as extreme and radical

• 
  @ReturningRuh25 күн бұрын

  @@ibnMuharis. the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم didn’t fear Major Shirk for his nation. Only minor shirk. Muhammad Bin Abd al-Wahhaab in his الدرر السنيةsaid: "And I inform you about myself - I swear by Allah whom there is none worthy to worship except Him - 1 have sought knowledge and those who knew me believed that I had knowledge while I did not know the meaning of لا اله إلا الله at that time and did not know the religion of Islam before this grace that Allah favored. As well as my teachers no one among them knew that. And if someone from the scholars of al-'Aridh (the lands of Najd and surrounding areas) claims that he knew the meaning of لا إله إلا الله" or knew the meaning of Islam before this time, or claims on behalf of his teachers that someone from them knew that, then he has lied and said falsehood and deceived the people and praised himself with something he does not possess." So it begs the question, who did he learn from tawheed from?

• 
  @AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj6 ай бұрын

  May Allah humuliate the one who posted this video, Yaqir Qahdi wants to unite ahlul Sunnah with graveworshippers. According to him calling to the dead and asking for help is not Shirk. Not did he insult Allah by saying we should abrogate his laws since they arent applyable today, not only that he says we should celebrate christmas. Whoever takes from this deviant either is ignorant or a filthy innovator and person of desires. Deviants sharing deviants

• 
  @thetanweerali6 ай бұрын

  You didn't get the point, MIAW came with extreme takfir. Even Shawkani and San'ani rebuked him on his extremism.

• 
  @adorablecheetah29306 ай бұрын

  I am certain that you either didn't read books from scholars or you are a liar,​@@thetanweerali

• 
  @AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj6 ай бұрын

  @@adorablecheetah2930 I have read them so stop coping. The only so called scholars who critisized him were deviant graveworshipping innovators who say it is allowed to ask help from the dead. Imagine being so stupid that muslims take knowledge from mushrikeen. Thats why you are either a Salafi or an innovator from 72 sects of hellfire. Cus the innovators support Shirk while the Salafi/Sunnis refute and expose them alhamdulillah.

• 
  @thetanweerali6 ай бұрын

  @@adorablecheetah2930 Look it up buddy.

• 
  @adorablecheetah29306 ай бұрын

  @@thetanweerali sure

• 
  @brother38906 ай бұрын

  Mistranslation

• 
  @hassanadan73717 ай бұрын

  By this logic, nothing is Shirk. We can pray to a tree and say we have a long list of people doing it in the past and present.

• 
  @infoage2655 ай бұрын

  It is more nuanced than that brother. Praying to a tree or anything other than Allah and that is not disputed by anyone. The issue is what constitutes prayer and what does not. Those who perform istighathah believe their blessings are coming solely from Allah and not from the dead person they call upon. They believe the dead person is just a means like water is a means to quench thirst when it is in fact Allah that quenches the thirst.

• 
  @hassanadan73715 ай бұрын

  @@infoage265 a means to what, who and where?

• 
  @infoage2655 ай бұрын

  @@hassanadan7371 Water is means to quenching thirst although it is infact Allah in reality that quenches thirst. In that sense the righteous status of the dead man is a means to having their dua accepted by Allah because of their love of that individual. The dua is to Allah in reality not the dead person and they believe the love of the dead person will be a cause for Allah accepting the dua. They believe the dead are in fact doing nothing or if they do anything then it is Allah that gave them the ability, therefore it is still only Allah sending the blessing. The calling out to the person by name is just an expression or a greeting but the belief is that Allah is the only one that protects and blesses. This is why some of the ulema of the past declared it as an action that resembles shirk but has not actually reached the level of shirk. They deemed it Haram because of its resemblance to shirk but did not declare those who did it as mushrikeen as long as they believed ability is only with Allah. This was a widely accepted position among scholars for centuries and this is what Yasir Qadhi is talking about.

• 
  @Mehmet_Fateh3 ай бұрын

  The issue is more nuanced than that. First, nobody prays to the Prophet, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam. Second, He, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam, is alive in his grave. Third, the angels convey your salam to Him, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam. Forth, our deeds are presented to Him, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam and He seeks forgiveness on our behalf. With all that taken into account, you cannot say that istighatha is shirk, as the claim is that you are asking the Prophet, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam, to make du'a on your behalf. Do I make istighatha through the Prophet, sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam? No. But I cannot label those who do as mushrikeen.

• 
  @hassanadan73713 ай бұрын

  @@Mehmet_Fateh provide clear evidence from the Quran and Sunnah. Of course non. Just pure emotions.

• 
  @MM-mc8hs7 ай бұрын

  إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون Invoking to other than Allah عز و جل is major shirk and the punishment is eternal hellfire “He causes the night to enter the day, and He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed. If you invoke them, they do not hear your supplication; and if they heard, they would not respond to you. And on the Day of Resurrection they will deny your association. And none can inform you like [one] Acquainted [with all matters].“ Qur’an 35:13-14

• 
  @Ghiyassudin5 ай бұрын

  Calling upon a false god is Shirk yes, but calling on a Prophet or Wali or even Angels is completely permissible and even recommended. RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝When there befalls a difficulty upon you in travel, then he should call, ❛Help, servants of Allāh!❜❞ ‎This is recorded by Bazzār in his Musnad and Ibn Abī Shaybah in his Muşannaf, from Ibn Ábbās. ‎[Vol. 10, pg 155] ‎Ábdullāh ibn Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal states: ❝I heard my father saying: I performed Ĥajj five times, twice riding and thrice on foot, or twice on foot and thrice riding. Once when I was on foot, I lost the way, so I began to say, ❛Show me the way, O servants of Allāh!❜ I kept repeating this until I was back on track.❞ [Masāyil Imām Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal, pg. 245]

• 
  @MM-mc8hs5 ай бұрын

  @@Ghiyassudin Calling upon other than Allah عز و جل is impermissible and major shirk. Allah عز و جل ayaat and after ayaat in the Qur’an warns against those who invoke to other than Him. It is beyond comprehension that a person can claim to recite the Qur’an and then miss these crystal clear verses. Are you familiar with these ayaat? Where did Allah عز و جل or the Prophet ﷺ legislate for you to invoke to other than Allah? Rather it is the reason why the Prophet ﷺ was sent, to forbid invoking to other than Allah عز و جل

• 
  @Ghiyassudin5 ай бұрын

  @@MM-mc8hs I Cited you a Hadith of the Prophet ﷺ and a narration of Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (Rahimahullah). Are you going to accuse them of being Mushrikeen ? And calling upon a idol/false god is Shirk yes, but calling on a creation with the acknowledgment that only Allah can will if they are capable of doing something or not is not Shirk. You wouldn’t accuse those of going to the doctors of being Mushrikeen for not directly asking for the help of Allah, so apply that here as well.

• 
  @MM-mc8hs4 ай бұрын

  @@Ghiyassudin It is interesting that you choose to bypass the numerous ayaat in Qur’an over a supposed narration (is it sahih, is the chain or narrators reliable, are you falsely attributing statements imam)? The mushrikeen are those that invoke to other than Allah عز و جل. This is crystal clear in the Qur’an. I would not accuse those who go to the doctor for help “as shirk”. However, I would accuse those who invoke the doctor “as shirk”. There is a difference between asking the doctor and invoking the doctor. Example 1. You go to doctor for help and he helps you (at doctors office) Vs. 2. You invoke the doctor to help you (from your home without any telecommunication). Ie you make dua to him to help you Are both #1 and #2 the same according to you?

• 
  @Ghiyassudin4 ай бұрын

  @@MM-mc8hs I’ve already brought up to you that calling upon a false god is Shirk but calling another creation with the acknowledgment that only Allah can will for them to be capable of helping isn’t Shirk. So I don’t see why you’re claiming I ignored this. And making Dua of Worship to other than Allah is Shirk, but simply calling someone who isn’t present isn’t Shirk. Angels are by the way present and alive and capable so I don’t see why you would still claim that seeking their help is Shirk. And to answer your question about authenticity will quote you a Hadith along with the scholars who acknowledged its narrator’s were trustworthy. RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝When there befalls a difficulty upon you in travel, then he should call, ❛Help, servants of Allāh!❜❞ ‎This is recorded by Bazzār in his Musnad and Ibn Abī Shaybah in his Muşannaf, from Ibn Ábbās. ‎[Vol. 10, pg 155] Imām Abu’l Ĥasan Nūruddīn Álī al-Shāfiýī al-Haythamī [735-807 AH / 1335-1405 CE] records the same narration in Majmá al-Zawāyid wa Manbá al-Fawāyid and then writes: ❝It’s narrators are thiqāt [trustworthy].❞ [Vol 10, pp. 138-139]

• 
  @najmussaqib71848 ай бұрын

  yeah got it

• 
  @hussinabdulrahman68698 ай бұрын

  taymiyyah is a shiea 666 Albany is a shiea 1999

• 
  @uzzy_7879 ай бұрын

  So he says that Asrar doesnt identify as a brelvis rather a Hanafu Ash'ari but then describes Abdurahman Hassan as a Najdi? Clearly shows the bias of these filthy ikhwanis

• 
  @noufalbinzainudheen56339 ай бұрын

  SO GUYS YOU ARE SIMPLY INSULTING IMAM SHAFI & 4 MADHABS

• 
  @MK-uu2nb9 ай бұрын

  Thanks for Sharing

• 
  @AmirMuhammad144510 ай бұрын

  Why is it speed up

• 
  @Rah.gaming39 ай бұрын

  U can go on settings and slow it down.

• 
  @user-cm9fe7ss2p10 ай бұрын

  May Allah guide you to the straight path

• 
  @user-cm9fe7ss2p10 ай бұрын

  ضال مضل هداك الله

• 
  @fengsports206311 ай бұрын

  There's no proof it is haram. There's no proof it is shirk. Think critically about both things.

• 
  @iMan-6107 ай бұрын

  It has proof. People of other world cannot cause benefit or harm .and Allah says: (10:106) "Do not call upon any apart from Allah on those who have no power to benefit or hurt you"

• 
  @As.sabiqqun11 ай бұрын

  What feeds the Wahabbi Dawah of Tawheed : 1 - sufis do things that none of the Sahaba, or Tabi'in or followers of the Tabi'in have ever done. Like dancing, doing Dhikr all together in one voice, saying the name of "Allah" as a Dhikr. Who would worship Allah with something new that none of these generations has done ? When did the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم do at least 1 of these ? 2 - some sufis do clear shirk, like making Dua to their saints, same as Quraysh did and they were judged disbelievers by Allah for that. 3 - sufis think their dream are a source to take the Deen from, not one single Sahabi has done that without the approval of the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم, and the scholars say that dreams are for استئناس not استدلال. 4 - some sufis think that one day they will reach the Yaqeen (it is mentionned in the last verse of Surat Al Hijr, and their tafseer of it is a state in wich they dont need to do their obligations as a Muslim anymore, like the 5 daily prayers) while Ahlus Sunnah's tafseer of Yaqeen in Surat Al Hijr is the death. 5 - some sufis think their "sheikhs" can create the womb in the belly, and some pretend they see the Angels. I have a question for you, who's a better Saint, your "sheikhs" or the Sahaba ? If the Sahaba never ever done that, how comes your "sheikh" came after all these years and did that ? My brothers, we as Muslims follow the Qur'an wich is the word of Allah, and the authentic Sunnah of our beloved Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم. If you see anything new, look in the Qur'an and the Sunnah if it is in it. If not, throw it against the wall.

• 
  @user-dz4ty5tj7q Жыл бұрын

  Are not some of these actions shirk and not just bidah?

• 
  @dariusneidhart1068 Жыл бұрын

  Muslims should avoid practices that are controversial like this. It’s like walking on a railway track. It’s very dangerous.

• 
  @n.a364211 ай бұрын

  Def but I think it's high time we start educating the masses or at least put out enough resources to show it isn't always shirk and why the Najdi understanding isn't completely correct and dangerous.

• 
  @NicholasMoskov111 ай бұрын

  I agree, as a layman, if we aren't sure, we shouldn't indulge. But making takfir on brothers in Islam is a grave sin in itself and must also be avoided. Sayyiduna ‘Umar ibn Al Khattab (radiyallahu ‘anhu) said: “Assume the best about your brother until what comes to you from him overcomes you (and you have to change your opinion).” So as a layman muslim, I cannot assume that the most of the traditional Scholars of Islam and the Ashari majority of the Ummah are Mushirkeen. The evidence from these Ulema make it impossible to definitively declare these actions as shirk, only discuss from an educated point of view. As a layman, we just need to take it easy, do a normative practice with all of our fellow brothers, and ask for guidance from Allah.

• 
  @-Ahmed859210 ай бұрын

  In some places wearing Hijab is controversial should Muslims do that as well???

• 
  @LadooCrew Жыл бұрын

  The najdi dawah is the biggest fitna to prevent unity in this Ummah they are the ideology of the khawarij 💯, they are not orthodox ahlus sunnah wal jamah They have no heritage no history no tawatur. They are a minority they are ahlul.biddah. you can say it's haram but shirk no way no wonder this fitna is considered the "Qarn Al Shaytan" which is identified from najd.

• 
  @shifeq9770 Жыл бұрын

  genius sheikh

• 
  @ShafiAshari Жыл бұрын

  I gotta share my opinion on this and on my lil understanding, I am nobody and just a learner of knowledge. For me tawassul on RasulAllah is permissible with the evidences from the salaf itself while I view istigathah as makruh not shirk, I mean we have a lot of evidence of istigatha done by the a’imma of the ummah but it becomes makruh to the laymen and it becomes open to shirk, if there is no evidence about istigatha I would plainly declare it shirk but the evidence are there however I still view it inappropriate even though you dont mean to call upon the saliheen to be the sustainer of help thinking that Allah is still the sustainer. it is still makruh and inappropriate, dua is for Allah alone, nothing else you should be calling du’a

• 
  @Wedowhatwedo12311 ай бұрын

  Why not as bidah? Yeah there are scholars who have allowed it but they are later ones. Give me one scholar from the time of abu hanifa till the time of imam ahmed who allowed it. And general tawassul like by the right of etc is makruh in hanafi madhab Or atleast this is one of the opinion in the madhab and other opinion is its allowed Edit:don't reply on general tawassul part cause I personally don't deem it makruh

• 
  @-Ahmed859210 ай бұрын

  Istigatha isn’t dua to anyone but Allah. Just follow the Shafi’i madhab on it you have little understanding

• 
  @AlMulk212 ай бұрын

  Its because your a clear Jahil. Asking other then Allah for help is for the Juhal no problem it seems. Tawheed is for you people a term which you never use because you distorted the meaning. Istigathe to other then Allah is by consensus of the salaf shirk, so dont claim salafiyyah ya jahil.

• 
  @yaseenaljanabi1338 Жыл бұрын

  nice😉

• 
  @Gog3453 Жыл бұрын

  Like Christianity,Wahhabism is a lawless religion with blasphemous beliefs

• 
  @conjugatemethod Жыл бұрын

  This man is so full of it - it's risible.

• 
  @GenerationSalaahudDeen Жыл бұрын

  Hang on so are you saying that what Imam Ahmed and the many other scholars suffered for in their time was extreme? And did you read the Book al-Ibaadah by Imam al-Mu’allimi al-Yamaani? And were the great Imaams with them mentioning the Agreements in the issues of Aqeedah in Sharh usool I’tiqaad by Imaam al-Laalikaa’i, was that wrong? Why have you left the way of the Sahaaba RA and the Taabieen and the 4 Imams and the other imams of their times?

• 
  @user-uy8pg4wv4b Жыл бұрын

  love you for the sake of allah my brother

• 
  @shukrimahmud6128 Жыл бұрын

  Dr YQ clearly said it is haram & forbidden but won't go as far as to say it's syirk. We do not know the intentions of those practicing it. To say they are musyrik has huge implications. Their meat is not halal, we cannot marry their daughters, can't allow them to enter our mosques & it's totally divisive.

• 
  @uzzy_7879 ай бұрын

  With this stupid logic we can't takfir anyone

• 
  @tazboy19348 ай бұрын

  ​​@@uzzy_787it's very dangerous for laymen to do takfir ...it's actually prohibited for laymen to do takfir...only high level scholars can do with severe conditions

• 
  @muslimsakemuslim79567 ай бұрын

  @@tazboy1934 Yes but how YQ describes it not even the scholars are allowed because nothing is shirk according to him then.

• 
  @AlMulk212 ай бұрын

  @@tazboy1934 Thats a lie. Show me who said that laymen are not allowed to do takfeer. If the evidence is brought to a laymen, he has to do takfeer. By your logic, no revert were allowed to say la ilaha which is kufr bit taghut. The one who commits shirk is a kafir, and istigatha to other then Allah is per Ijma SHIRK and whoever allows it is a kafir and whoever does it is a mushrik.

• 
  @ReturningRuh22 күн бұрын

  @@AlMulk21 1. Istighāthah, whether directed towards the living or the deceased, still affirms that Allah retains exclusive authority and power, regardless if the intermediary’s assistance is sought. 2. Shirk manifests when individuals attribute divine attributes or intrinsic abilities to anyone other than Allah, whether living or deceased. 3. Istighāthah, by its nature, does not confer divine attributes nor intrinsic ability upon intermediaries. 4. Those who believe in the inherent ability of the living or deceased to grant assistance independently of Allah are, in fact, committing shirk by rejecting Allah's absolute authority and power. 5. Therefore, Istighāthah, when properly understood and practiced, doesn’t contradict Tawhīd because one is still affirming Allah as the ultimate source of all help and assistance, despite if one seeks assistance from the living or the deceased.

• 
  @waliul280 Жыл бұрын

  You are a liar yourself

• 
  @kiyopon4439 Жыл бұрын

  Can you disprove a single claim he made in this video?

• 
  @Stop_israHELL Жыл бұрын

  💯

• 
  @MohammedAlSharif2002 Жыл бұрын

  Nope Yasir Qadhi is totally wrong, I might upload a video proving it.

• 
  @Stop_israHELL Жыл бұрын

  @@MohammedAlSharif2002 good4 u

• 
  @bushaita10 ай бұрын

  This is completely wrong. Ibn Taymeyyah mentioned what people claimed and he refuted it in the same book. If Yaser Qadi continues reading, he will get the answer. حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل

• 
  @mdkhan3928 Жыл бұрын

  ...intention when you do an act of Shirk/Kufr Akbar is irrelevant - except under duress obviously.🤷🏿‍♀️😇