Пікірлер

• 
  @BSMArtnLitКүн бұрын

  chomsky is one of those “intellectual”, he would be supporting hamas if he were around.

• 
  @finneganlindsay2 күн бұрын

  The general Postmodern ideology is one that eludes critique and actively works against it. One can only parody and humorize it show it's faults, as Sokol did. That does not mean it does not have value in itself, but the academics who spur it on are people of supreme anger and resentment that they will not genuinely engage with any opposition to their ideas, that is why they must use the most heinous and pretentious language. At some point it gets so convoluted and at the limit as to where it cannot be critiqued in good faith, and that is the goal.

• 
  @cdavid07154 күн бұрын

  The problem with Peterson is it seems to overly emphasize the role of post modernism in his critique of modern left politics while ignoring completely the role of the Frankfurt school

• 
  @HumHum-fx2ob6 күн бұрын

  Really enjoyed this!!

• 
  @chicagofineart95466 күн бұрын

  The French Academy loves its intellectuals. Which is exactly the opposite of the US, which largely ignores its intellectuals. Here's my take: The French, when faced with the critique of the Frankfort School, decides it needs a critique of the critique and the only way to advance that was to be more radical than the most radical German thinkers of the mid 20th century. So here I'm dumbing down for idiots like myself: The French contribution to the critique of Capitalism was that nothing works. Reform doesn't work, changes in government doesn't work, even revolution doesn't work. The oppressed will always be oppressed by a musical chairs of oppressed and oppressors. (e.i., Obama was the change we were waiting for, and then nothing really changed). In the end its a nihilistic philosophy and a sort of intellectual replay of French modernism since the French revolution; Monarchy--Revolution devolving into The Terror, social overreach--proto fascism of Napoleon and rule by dictate, overreach of dictator, return to neo-monarchy trying to imitate the British--failure of neo-monarchic conservatism, revolution of 1848-49, overreach again of reactionary forces. France is just one awful thing after another throughout most of the 19th century. (OK, what place isn't, right?). In short, French post-modern philosophy slides into nihilism and fatalism. It's a wonderful life!

• 
  @MC-ou7sn7 күн бұрын

  If anyone's interested in a dissenting view on this topic, I would recommend Iain McGilchrist's "The Matter with Things". What Kahneman and others call system 1 and system 2 thinking he assigns to the right and left hemispheres of the brain respectively and advocates for the use of intuition over the use logic.

• 
  @Madasin_Paine7 күн бұрын

  Gnome the Chomsky is an MIC MIT product and is not reliably trustworthy and heavily biased and absolutely unable to confront how dangerously wrong he is about conspiracy theories that turn out truths beit JFK, 9 11 and especially 2019? bioengineering release of new infections that make tremendous money and and unnecessary misery amd tyranny. He gets far to much credit for sloppy linguistic research and for Manufacturing Consent. His coauthor is a more virtuous decent intellectual. Chomsky is extremely insecure amongst worthy challengers but he loves kids. They eat it up and the liberals of these, moreso. Why is he married to a women his child's age? What's that about?? Who is she really and why is he with him now?? Don't over invest in him but dont ignore all of his work or opinions on his website. He recommended essentially, concentration camps and starving for those unwilling to take experimental dangerous novel therapeutics and unqualified lockdowns etc. He's not a medical expert whatsoever. But people blindly suck him up like young sheep at a teat. no matter the subject of which he pretends to be a comprehensive expert unless its a red line topiv foe which he plays ignorant...I never saw anything like that...i never heard that...im not familiar. A BS MTN specialist to be sure but am unusually useful too and oftentimes rightfully.

• 
  @bubblegumgun32927 күн бұрын

  🤣😂 Chomsky is still mad about the azz kicking he took from Foucault gotta luv at the end of that debate Chomsky was cornered into proclaiming objective morality and even flat out admitted he had no actual argument for it and just expected Foucault to grant him objective morality . but this is the tactic of every anarcho communist appeal to God and his moral law, say there is no God but still retain the moral law to support the argument from morality 🤣😂 using post modernism to defeat post modernism HA! 😂, Post modernism is nihilist to your underlying moral appeals it doesn't care about your appeal to emotion, nothing has changed from commies

• 
  @Mohamed-bm6yk9 күн бұрын

  I like this man so much

• 
  @YeahThatsTough11 күн бұрын

  Deconstruct deconstruction

• 
  @Nigelzenig12 күн бұрын

  Common sense valuable here

• 
  @SnekChrmr13 күн бұрын

  A true visionary

• 
  @merc560413 күн бұрын

  I recommended you to one of my teachers as a great philosophy source, he’s probably going to issue a safeguarding report on me now.

• 
  @Mon00013 күн бұрын

  Oh my god, I know you are joking but I am very sorry anyway.

• 
  @mertyaroglu496413 күн бұрын

  Hi, is everything alright?

• 
  @Mon00013 күн бұрын

  Yes, sorry for this.

• 
  @mertyaroglu496413 күн бұрын

  Okay then, just saw the notification and was worried for a while. Have a nice day!

• 
  @Mon00013 күн бұрын

  @@mertyaroglu4964 you too!

• 
  @destry525014 күн бұрын

  LOLz. I wish chompsky would be more critical of HAMAS . . .

• 
  @Nai-qk4vp14 күн бұрын

  0:14 Kid Named Finger:

• 
  @TheBaluchiterium15 күн бұрын

  Chomsky was spot on here, although I normally do not like his political opinions. In general, after having done physics for nearly 40 years it is still astonishing to me how much quasi-sophisticated garbage is produced in the humanities and people are even promoted to professors on the piles of this garbage (see gender studies, to name just one example).

• 
  @andreasfrank863516 күн бұрын

  ❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️🌊❤️............

• 
  @c.645216 күн бұрын

  Postmodernism is the height of petit-bourgeois decadence and it has successfully subverted and largely destroyed the left worldwide.

• 
  @rmcnabb16 күн бұрын

  If there's one thing we can be certain of - one central pivot in the universe - it's that NONE of this matters in the least, and any effort spent on it is effort wasted.

• 
  @scolexuk17 күн бұрын

  Postmodernists: we must be sceptical of grand overarching narratives Also postmodernists: Everything has always been and will always be about power Postmodernists are obsessed with power and control, and assume that the rest of society shares their pathology

• 
  @lukeriely446817 күн бұрын

  Jordan Peterson is a wonderful example of PM crap.

• 
  @foodandmoney18 күн бұрын

  A very disingenuous critique. There is no doubt that post-modernism can be employed in bad faith as you suggest, but to claim the entire enterprise is such is nonsense. Post-modernism is about reassessing existing claims of truth in relation to their assumptions or normative content. Suggesting it is merely a “language game” and pseudo-intellectualism, and even more painfully suggesting the existence of “genuine intellectuals” who simply “speak plainly” has missed the point entirely. Postmodernism is not to be understood as a new and superior form of knowledge, it is a tool for developing deeper understanding of all knowledge claims, especially in terms of what kind of societies, behaviours, or ethics those knowledge claims create. Of course postmodernism is susceptible to its own deconstructive methods. As it should be. The point is that all knowledge has practical and ethical consequences. Some knowledges produce undesirable consequences (suffering, violences, division, etc). Forms of knowledge which can be associated with these consequences should be scrutinised because knowledge emerges as behaviour. As such, Chomsky is right to criticise the undesirable consequences of postmodernism by using its own tools, but this is hardly a “scathing critique” as much as it is a clear demonstration of the critical power of postmodern ideas. Unfortunately your argument is nothing but a straw man. You have claimed postmodernism is nothing but an arrogant, unintelligible, destructive movement and then argued accordingly. Very disingenuous indeed.

• 
  @markomiranda28319 күн бұрын

  Chompsky is really cringe and kind of pathetic.

• 
  @joshfoley520519 күн бұрын

  A Master Gatekeeper

• 
  @he1ar120 күн бұрын

  Post modernists didnt create our culture. Philosophers do not have that power. They took what was already there and put it back into society for society to consume. The romantics were the first of the postmodernists. Nietzsche the greatest romantic, non-romantic of them all said that many who claimed to be romantics really weren't; they were replicating ancient Greek religion. Theories of a good life, living for the moment, theories of progress; none of them are modern ideas. They were known 1000s of years ago.

• 
  @gilroe227420 күн бұрын

  I think both are right. While Chomsky explains how something as pernicious as post-modernism came about, Peterson explains what it has turned into and how it maintains power.

• 
  @ThermaL-ty7bw21 күн бұрын

  the answer to the '' is - ought '' distinction = slavery that's the ONLY CORRECT ANSWER !!! the only '' ought '' you can get from an '' is '' , >>> you OUGHT to do what the master says that's the logical outcome i don't understand why that's SO HARD to figure out

• 
  @SportsBettingFacts24 күн бұрын

  Torturing nature by colliding subatomic particles lolololololololololol Feminists are the most ridiculous clowns

• 
  @johnrossini359426 күн бұрын

  capitalists did not make everyone rich

• 
  @kazkk232126 күн бұрын

  Sokol proved the innate corruption of modern academia and their inability to care about objectivity. Sokol hoax reminds me of the experiment conducted by R.D. Laying and the anti psychiatry movement that showed how easy it is to fool psychiatry into believing a patient had mental disorder when they didn’t and how modern psychiatry cannot distinguish sanity from insanity in any meaningful way

• 
  @kazkk232126 күн бұрын

  The idea that they allow a phd thesis about astrology to be published with high honours is silly and bad for intellectual development

• 
  @lucasgust772027 күн бұрын

  Harris' argument is ridiculous. The U.S. itself committed the 9/11 attack. There is a lot of evidence.

• 
  @andybrice271127 күн бұрын

  As far as I can tell: The postmodernists largely lost the debate. So they just took over the university administration instead, and came back with a vengeance around 2010.

• 
  @Flumpadorus26 күн бұрын

  Did you get that from Fox news?

• 
  @andybrice271126 күн бұрын

  @@Flumpadorus Nope. I got it from the fact that admin departments have ballooned (sometimes becoming larger than the faculty) and explicitly write policies using the language and ideas from these fields.

• 
  @galek7525 күн бұрын

  Postmodernists won the debate. Also admin is bloated with "science" bros *using* the language of Pomo theorists.

• 
  @Nai-qk4vp14 күн бұрын

  ​​@@galek75How about you and the chump above provide some real EVIDENCE supporting what you say instead of just " LALALA I WON I CAN'T HEAR YOU"?

• 
  @galek7514 күн бұрын

  @@Nai-qk4vp Evidence? Bro you did not just ask for evidence like this is some science experiment XDD And btw, the science-tards are the ones arguing against straw men, since they don't even UNDERSTAND what the "pomos" were saying.

• 
  @Wartensteiin28 күн бұрын

  Stealing food to clench your hunger in this instance isn't immoral in Islam.

• 
  @joaovitorreisdasilva957328 күн бұрын

  What scares me is not that fake papers passed the process. It is what poorly thought, whatever, or poorly done research, passed without people even noticing it to this day. Niggas be there writin' and publishin' non-sense yo.

• 
  @Raydensheraj29 күн бұрын

  Postmodernism....puke. Deconstructionists....puke. Philosophical mumbo jumbo that creates its own, alternative facts or.... bullcrap. It has to be rejected in every possible way.

• 
  @JM-us3fr29 күн бұрын

  I once told my brother “Inside every bad argument is a better argument.” The reason is because fallacies or sort of short-cuts of reasoning, skipping over the nuance. It’s because people don’t often understand _why_ they think something is true, and instead reason from their gut.

• 
  @donaldwhittaker798729 күн бұрын

  A theory must be falsifiable, assertions require evidence, history requires documents. Propositions that contradict these requirements are baloney and can be safely ignored. Metaphysics is rubbish so lets get on with empirical reality.

• 
  @ZacharyBittner29 күн бұрын

  Is falsification falsifiable?

• 
  @antun8829 күн бұрын

  The idea that universe is governed by unchanging natural laws is pure metaphysics. Wild assumption if you really think about it. Universe is not a government office.

• 
  @trippersweet763229 күн бұрын

  @@ZacharyBittner is water wet

• 
  @ye_zus29 күн бұрын

  ​@@ZacharyBittner I would say yes, if there is an empirical way to show empiricism to be false then yes. It is difficult to critique empiricism from another foundationally different perspective and for the critiques to make sense under both paradigms

• 
  @Dystisis28 күн бұрын

  but there is no empirical way to show empiricism to be false, since it's a metaphysics@@ye_zus

• 
  @opinion374229 күн бұрын

  I thought asking questions was supposed to be a good thing. Or are things black and white? And if so what are people up to really when asking questions? This is just standard messy human relations. After all, science, life, you name it, are all human endeavors. Trust the ones making the loudest noises to take the most extreme positions and to lack nuance altogether.

• 
  @boptillyouflop27 күн бұрын

  Nothing wrong with asking questions. But postmodernists do it wrong. They don't ask if a field is wrong or right ("Is geography broadly true?"). They also don't ask if a field is useful to society ("Are people with geography degrees helpful in their jobs?"). Rather, they ask questions as a way to say that field is prejudiced and co-opted by power ("Is mainstream positivist geography racist/classist/sexist/homophobe?"). They want everyone to feel guilty.

• 
  @opinion374227 күн бұрын

  @@boptillyouflop Just a ridiculous caricature - as if treating post modernism as a poorly imagined monolith gives any credit to the person doing it!

• 
  @boptillyouflop25 күн бұрын

  @@opinion3742 Admittedly, the myriad of nuances between Derrida, Baudrillard, Lyotard, Deleuze are beyond me (my field is synthesizers, not philosophy). And maybe the moralizing and misplaced politics is 1% of Postmodernism. But it's that specific 1% that's doing a ton of damage to the reputation of academia, and demagogues merely have to point to stuff like that infamous feminist glaciology paper to make all of us look like lunatics.

• 
  @opinion374225 күн бұрын

  @@boptillyouflop The "damage" is political propaganda. There is something deeply suspicious about people wanting to shut down certain academic studies. It is all too conspiratorial.

• 
  @JonMurrayАй бұрын

  Great video. New subscriber ✌🏻

• 
  @othaner38Ай бұрын

  Say that to people beliveing in plane earth and ALL fake news published in the media. Say that to Boris Johnson and Farage. Say that to Trump (US) and Bolsonaro (BRA). The reality (If It is possible to define such think nowadays) is Impossible to separate from its simulacrum. The Matrix has you.

• 
  @dadsonworldwide3238Ай бұрын

  As we end temporary waivers everyone thats benefited dont want to let go of the perks . Weve been so successful achieving all 1700s-1800s goals throughout 1900s structuralism that even the most fringe extremist criminals & weirdo pedophiles want to be liberated and receive transferred wealth to them by extending reagan and thatchers temporary waiver that itself was an extended period of temporary waiver charged upon on the native family cells. 2024 should be an enormous victory celebration despite the fact it is a cross roads of countless complexities & burdens coming to an end . Ya Have to remember how anomalous 1900s structuralism is in the history of humanity. We forcibly removed people from the land to meet factory demands requiring large gathering labor needs for condensed living. We had to be indoctrinated to live our current way of life behaviors. When jethro tulls plow plus a 100 of years of educating serfs & slaves alike with soul agency free will inertia frame of reference correlated with the eternal cosmos floor of reality defining freedom as we know it that they have value & benefit under God on earth. Most Slaves actullay sold their homestead act claimed land of 350 acres right back to the globalist plantation owners and moved back to communal living on plantations. When the globalist familys moved north they did so to take the labor to build power ,water and road infrastructure. Like a job service they rented out cheaper labor and this turned into south vs north economic back n forth laws & bills . Point is people don't organically live the way we have.

• 
  @dadsonworldwide3238Ай бұрын

  We achieved our goals, and now the antiquated tools used are in the way.These outdated grandfathered in along the way obstacles that was useful control mechanisms have to relinquish & accept victory. Mass displacement of Europe 100 yrs ago brought with it things that many Americans & Brits had fled. But needs and demands of the age justified it all . What Jethro tulls plow did for farming the computational plow is about to do in Academia. globalist fatigue has set in but at the Sametime we took on a European political scale in America and set our own invented pragmatic common sense anti trust American capitalism bottom up rule saving one soul at a time aside. We settled on prayer logic conservative whatsboutism vs cursed rationalism progressive interventionism and removed the 3rd most important step where we reserve the right to invoke common sense blessings, to sir bacon out here not in physicalism or reductionism but in more mri machine like line of thought. That all physicalism is subject to change without further notice just like any other idealistic or subjective properties or systems. Pragmatic American objectivism founding had the computational plow in mind so the Renaissance is aided by tech and arbitrary example is being drawn upon already. 1900s structuralism charged a huge burden upon the native family cells in uk & America to right wrongs of the past,industrialize the world to produce items so they would trade for resources instead of warring for them,new nations drawing new borders. We achieved all these goals liberated all common sense groups leaving only extremist criminals and we will never free pedophiles or beastilaty willingly. We stripped out all our sources & inspirational objective arbitrary example to make educational reforms so to not offend or upset the rest of the world so they could participate in our curriculum. In making it accessible to Muslims, athiest, hindu you name it we striped out our Christian orientation and direction that underpins it all. That helps provide arbitrary example when A + B controdidict buy both A & B shared like minded natural direction. We removed 18 -30 yr old from our workforce in exchange for 12 year degrees of specialized knowledge that Is now becoming unnecessary as the public library is being eaten by computation where we can train for how to access universal operating systems what tool Is needed on what applications . X,y,z manmade time hierarchy knowledge of Good and evil equations is the training of this future. It won't matter if your in medical feilds or small parts manufacturing the training is to be universal for the vast majority of us. Obviously it's still farmers who are no where near the lobby power they once where and the same Is about to occur in academics and many other feilds. One day even tech giants will lose lobby power in similar fashions

• 
  @liminalzone909Ай бұрын

  I find tribalism is easy and nuance to be hard work. I wouldn't have put Chomsky alongside Dawkins as Dawkins is so dogmatic. (Although Chomsky has fought tooth and nail against challenges to his linguistic theories). I find it ironic that many Postmodernists pride themselves as some kind of trickster class then moan about a prank pulled on them. If any good has come of this it has ressurected hoax as a respectful rhetorical move.

• 
  @ZacharyBittner29 күн бұрын

  Postmodernism do not see themselves as tricksters. They just account for more than analytical philosophy. Consider that philosophers like Richard Rorty saw himself as a post modernist

• 
  @liminalzone90929 күн бұрын

  @@ZacharyBittner maybe that was an unthought comment thrown out on my part. I have to admit I haven't read hardly any Post Modernists (self declared or other) at source but there is or was a fan base who gleefully saw them as disruptors - maybe a distant cousin of trickster. I do consider them a necessary part of the philosophical eco-system even if I think some of their ideas not especially helpful. Rorty was steeped in analytical method so when his interests broadened he, to my mind, retained a certain clarity. But I'm probably biased not being accclimatised to other styles.

• 
  @g.aathoz1211Ай бұрын

  Clickbait title, I think the mainstream media making fun of populists' appearance have more to do with the general public noticing and/or talking about their respective appearance. I mean first of all Trump's hair is not that peculiar really, when looking at it but I think people are visualizing the media caricatures when thinking of Trump instead, where he is portrayed with small hands and big bombastic hair. More importantly I can think of lots of mainstream figures with weird or noticeable hair but the difference is the mainstream media not caricaturing them in the same way, on the flip-side there are lots of populists with perfectly normal hair. I think this video is indicative of your own seemingly pro-mainstream bias than anything else.

• 
  @g.aathoz1211Ай бұрын

  I don't think this study is anything but self-fulfilling, I mean it is very obvious that people with strong political convictions will be more certain of their views and therefore less likely to change opinion. Independents not being sure or just entertaining a lot of different perspectives will also by nature be more likely to change views. Of course it is interesting that they are able to prove it with that simple test but as a thesis it is pretty self-evident what the results are going to be.

• 
  @bartholomewtott3812Ай бұрын

  Are you Italian?

• 
  @jonirischx8925Ай бұрын

  No. I am gay tho...

• 
  @trassel110427 күн бұрын

  I thought it was a finish accent at first but leaning more towards Italian now. Difficult to place tho, to me sounds like a mix of Italian, Icelandic and something Eastern European 🧐

• 
  @bartholomewtott381227 күн бұрын

  @@jonirischx8925 are you?

• 
  @Frownbrows25 күн бұрын

  ​@@jonirischx8925 same thing

• 
  @jonirischx892525 күн бұрын

  @@Frownbrows Eeeeyyyyyyyyy

• 
  @missingsigАй бұрын

  'distill' bruh this is anything but distilled. did you actually go to school? who was your prof? some awful b tier nonsense on your channel lol

• 
  @missingsigАй бұрын

  anyone who thought this was a good video subject, no less during COVID, I pray for you, fool. i really do.

• 
  @missingsigАй бұрын

  this video is proof you only know how to grift - your content is boring and uninteresting if you don't put genuinely attractive men in the thumbnail ahahaha can you give me the p-value of your likely virginity?