Пікірлер

• 
  @deadstones18 күн бұрын

  good video, even though you made me cringe every time with the "swords to plowshare"

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy8 күн бұрын

  My apologies 😂, it’s just how I say it when I play the game. Have to stop dropping that “s”

• 
  @commanderbydaenen9 күн бұрын

  Great video!

• 
  @TheFortuneIII17 күн бұрын

  would you slot in the new birthing ritual in this deck?

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy16 күн бұрын

  Most definitely! I was thinking about how much I hate when I make a deck and a new card is perfect for the deck.

• 
  @MrMarvelMikeАй бұрын

  @Commander by Daenen Actually posted a version of this deck for his patroen supporters and gave your video credit. You should check it out.

• 
  @jaceg810Ай бұрын

  Like the video, Turn rotation can be reversed though, and thus is not a stable factor Similarly, the deck randomness is probably a few orders of magnitude smaller, not that it is relevant, since its still big. This is because the order of the top 7 cards is irrelevant, as they will all be drawn, it only matters what cards total are there. In addition, if it comes to games played, a big part of the library simply does not matter order wise, as those cards never get seen or used. In addition, I would like to say that tutors make games feel more similar. I think there might be a lot of forces that make games similar, for example, a commander is a constant, and if a deck has many cards that have interchangeable effects, the possibility space really shrinks. For example, A Sram equipment deck does the same every game: It plays Sram, and gives him some amount of protection, stats and offensive keywords. The individual cards or narrative can lose some meaning to the general feel of "Sram is a big thing with a lot of keywords and protection" Similarly, tutors have a tendency to find a small subset of cards, between the best win condition, interaction and value engine, that makes games play out the same in a lot of scenerio's

• 
  @flukenukeemАй бұрын

  Cool list! Why no Gond Gate tho? That’s usually the first land I tutor up if I am running gates.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophyАй бұрын

  That’s a good question, I thought I had added it in. I basically just copy and pasted the physical copy I have into Tapped Out. Must have added another Basic to the list without realizing, but it should definitely be in the deck!

• 
  @flukenukeemАй бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy I see, ty!

• 
  @flukenukeemАй бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophyI think the whole mana base is prob out of date, since you are also missing the whole Baldur’s Gate gate cycle

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophyАй бұрын

  @@flukenukeem Ohh most definitely, I built the deck before Baulder’s Gate, not thinking there would ever be Gate support from Wizards. Then I wake up to Baulder’s and Gond’s Gate and asked why I was so unlucky. 😂

• 
  @MrMarvelMikeАй бұрын

  I’d like to see a tuned-up none budget version of this deck.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophyАй бұрын

  Honestly I thought about cranking up the power a bit and think tutors are the perfect direction! They’ll find all the combo pieces you need as well as find your amulet effects. I don’t think the deck could ever be cEDH level as we aren’t completely focused on one line of play, and our land base (Gates) naturally sets us back.

• 
  @MrMarvelMikeАй бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy there is a cEDH variant with Food Chain. I like the pact combo. I’m surprised you are not running felidar guardian. It combos with Kiki and can flicker Garth in a pinch. I think the gate combo isn’t worth building around to be honest. It is slowing down your interaction while making you a target. Whenever a card that says “when the game” stays on board, everyone turns their attention to you. I think all those components are better fit to support your Kiki Jiki or invest space into food chain.

• 
  @funmaker77Ай бұрын

  Good video :) Well presented and I really like your approach. I think most arguments fall apart though, once you move from casual commander to cEDH, as the number of possibilities drastically reduces, when one is only concerned with playing optimally, as it not only reduces the ammount of realistic targets, for a spell that chooses targets, but also the ammount of tutors creates a lot of redundancy and you see the same cards way more often. (That doesnt mean your point doesnt hold, its probably the main reason most people prefer casual over cEDH)

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophyАй бұрын

  I would definitely agree that optimal play makes a huge difference in any game. I think it’s a sign of a well seasoned player, but to bring it back on itself that Players bring their own understanding of the game and what to do in any given situation. However, thank you for the feedback and support on the video! It was a cool project to try and deconstruct into something cohesive (though it took a bit of time 😅)

• 
  @dezsomodos1314Ай бұрын

  Minimal issue about calculating number of possible deck orders: you simplified that with each card is unique in your deck. That is not the case in most commander table. Basic lands are not unique and you have around 10-35 cards which are exactly the same. Hovewer this does not invalidates the conclusion (no chance to sit with exactly the same deck twice).

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophyАй бұрын

  @@dezsomodos1314 I thought about that as well but thought more on the lines of each individual card being it’s own unique entity, for example, two basic Mountains having their own placements/order post-shuffle rather than just lumping them together as Basics. Now, more realistic, inclusion of Basic lands attempts to create redundancy, increasing the probability that you find a Basic Land, making the math a little more complex post shuffle, and makes the deck a little less random, but still highly improbable that you would ever have the exact same or “similar” structure. Great point to make though and completely valid to consider! On a side note, I think it’s really cool that the game can be talked about on such a complex level!

• 
  @FTWinchesterTV2 ай бұрын

  I'm taking inspiration from this and applying it to my "The Master, Transcendent" deck. I love birthing pod and I kinda forgot about whip. I use to play it back in theros block. It had a really cool interaction with Obzedat, Ghost Council's blink ability ignoring the downside of whip. Remembering that, Conjurer's Closet would be a spicy include. Save your whip creature and get more ETBs.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy2 ай бұрын

  That would be a really cool interaction with Closet honestly. Adds a little extra depth into the deck too even if it’s not applied with Whip because of all the ETBs in the deck. By all means, go for it!

• 
  @FTWinchesterTV2 ай бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy yeah exactly 😎

• 
  @boots4snootin5713 ай бұрын

  Scale up is a sorcery!

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy3 ай бұрын

  I wondered if anyone would ever catch that, but yes I realize that. I don’t know how I didn’t catch that during scripting or editing, but you’ve got a good eye on you!

• 
  @328crash3 ай бұрын

  I like the deck, birthing pod being one of my favorite cards. I understand the necessity of stopping graveyard hate hence the stifle and the Disallow, wouldnt Voidslime and tale's end be better choices over stifle? Voidslime is functionally a second copy of Disallow, and tale's end is a stifle that can counter most commanders?

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy3 ай бұрын

  They definitely could be swapped, Stifle is just a personal favorite. I actually debated on Tale’s End and decided on Stifle for its low-cost effectiveness. Honestly, slotting out the normal Counterspell for one of these two could make a lot of sense!

• 
  @328crash3 ай бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy perfectly valid reasoning, mana cost always needs to be taken into account

• 
  @r.kenobi83652 ай бұрын

  Everythings a 7

• 
  @josehaya63623 ай бұрын

  I’ll try this :) will let you know

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy3 ай бұрын

  Sounds good! The deck should be listed in the description. I would run it on Tapped Out or Copy/Paste into your own site and make changes to fit you.

• 
  @xr97904 ай бұрын

  I got tasigur cause I love Sultai, so I wanted all 3 of the Tarkir Sultai legends (I count Silumgar as one Ik he’s Dimir)- now I finally have a deck for him! This is dope

• 
  @RaeBaeGamez4 ай бұрын

  Following at instant speed, your deck building process is super similar to mine I love how in depth you get with it!

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy4 ай бұрын

  Honestly, I’m incredibly thankful for the support. Hopefully I’ll have more in the future that will catch your eye.

• 
  @RaeBaeGamez4 ай бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy and I'll be here to binge watch all of them 🫡 I do a lot of double shifts at work so it's nice to have these kind of videos to keep my magic brain in order 😂

• 
  @Sycho124 ай бұрын

  Great video, my friend in high school had a Tasigur deck that was definitely not optimized, but could stomp after turn 3. Ive wanted to build one of these for a while and your commentary on the strategies and cards helps a lot in making decisions.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy4 ай бұрын

  Well hopefully it’s a good outline, by all means take the deck and rearrange however you feel is best. And best of luck for your games in the future!

• 
  @MOSTLYxTOAST4 ай бұрын

  Not even gonna lie this is just an awful deekah list

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy4 ай бұрын

  I’m sorry it’s not to your liking, but everyone plays different and you’re more than welcome to change the list to your liking! Just out of curiosity, what makes you feel like it’s a bad list?

• 
  @awesomeman83854 ай бұрын

  New player her. Learning to build my own decks. This was a super awesome video

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy4 ай бұрын

  Well thank you, I’m glad you liked it! Hopefully I’ll have a bit more in the near future.

• 
  @jautele495 ай бұрын

  🔥🔥🔥

• 
  @user-ts7rf1up2g5 ай бұрын

  Are you sure that 34 (35 with a double-sided card) lands is enough for this deck? In my experience, a deck with a 6-cc commander should be running 2-3 more lands and 1-2 more pieces of ramp. I'd be inclined to replace two basics with Blighted Woodland and Myriad Landscape for a start.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy5 ай бұрын

  That’s a good question, but we do have some options for Ramp to ensure we won’t miss Land Drops. From Green searching for Lands, Artifacts, and Kydele, I really can’t imagine we’d ever run into any issues; especially, with the amount of early Scry that we have. However, please take the deck a edit it to your heart’s content to fit your play style!

• 
  @user-ts7rf1up2g5 ай бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy here's a few cards I came up with after a bit of thought: Kruphix, God of Horizons - sometimes Kydele generates more mana than you can use in a turn, don't let it go to waste! Patriar's Seal - A mana rock that untaps Kydele Decanter of Endless Water - another ramp piece that also preserves your extra cards Enjoyed the deck tech and now I'm a subscriber!

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy5 ай бұрын

  @@user-ts7rf1up2g Well thank you, hopefully there’s other content on the channel you’ll like. I’d also recommend Time Walk With Me as he has a far greater selection than I currently do.

• 
  @user-ts7rf1up2g5 ай бұрын

  @@CommanderPhilosophy Yep, also a subscriber there!

• 
  @timewalkwithme7245 ай бұрын

  @@user-ts7rf1up2g Hurray!

• 
  @SharpsBox5 ай бұрын

  20 tapped lands? Ouch.

• 
  @SharpsBox5 ай бұрын

  Actually 20+

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy5 ай бұрын

  Like I said, we really want Amulet out if we can get it. I also think it’s pretty fair that our Lands come in tapped considering we’re running a few two card combos.

• 
  @nsaneg00n746 ай бұрын

  Tapped out is horrible man use moxfield

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy6 ай бұрын

  I may in the future, Tapped Out has just been my go-to for years but it’s a bit dated.

• 
  @timewalkwithme7246 ай бұрын

  I went with lots of blink effects and haste enablers to allow Garth to do whatever I need him to do without worrying about the limitation in his tap ability. I also put in Displacer Kitten so I can create infinite Black Lotuses and use them to Braingeyser everybody into oblivion. I like your five-color-goodstuff strategy. I might try something like it with Kenrith as the commander. Or make a second Garth deck.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy6 ай бұрын

  I’ve just noticed there’s so much that you can do with Garth. I have a friend that also has one, that’s essentially another big combo deck. Hopefully you like the concept, and Happy Holidays!

• 
  @timewalkwithme7249 ай бұрын

  I like how you start your videos with a quote that puts the deck into a more profound light.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy9 ай бұрын

  I like to do so as I’ve come to learn that deck strategy usually comes to form its own personality in a way. The ideals around them are challenged by those of your opponents. It’s one of the main reasons why I’ve formed a deep love for the game.

• 
  @timewalkwithme7249 ай бұрын

  I like that deck name. You must be nuts to come up with something like that. :p Cheap spells that replace themselves in your hand are great for a deck like this, and blue is the perfect color for them. There are also quite a few blue creatures that tap for mana that can only be used to cast instants and sorceries. I like the idea of a blue deck that overwhelms opponents with creature tokens. It's really a pretty versatile color.

• 
  @CommanderPhilosophy9 ай бұрын

  I thought it might be a clever little call back to some old meme. But I didn’t even think about the Blue Mana Dorks that could do that. They probably could be includes if replacement spots can be found.