Пікірлер

• 
  @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi14 күн бұрын

  In the heart of Hilbert structure space time collapsing but a potentiality will remains of all possible states.

• 
  @vladkuchkin2577Ай бұрын

  www.youtube.com/@Skyrmion-magnetic

• 
  @SankhaSubhraBakshiexists2 ай бұрын

  23:10

• 
  @nandiganavishal2 ай бұрын

  circuit methods, simulations to characterize membrane in detail obtaining permittivity, charge regulation with time, ion-ion, particle-membrane interactions are published in membrane journals includes journal of membrane science, journal of polymer science part B: polymer physics, other journals name required is also must

• 
  @WorldRecordRapper2 ай бұрын

  Excellent talk, thanks!

• 
  @moirangthemsanahal66952 ай бұрын

  28:39 but how did one get that plot? I tried the hamiltonian using finite difference methid in python but the plot is coming out terrible. Lmao.. It would be really helpful if any ideas can be spared. :)

• 
  @JuanAbeyta-zx2os2 ай бұрын

  In

• 
  @prem43023 ай бұрын

  starts at 2:06

• 
  @JAYMOAP3 ай бұрын

  Very nice well done

• 
  @stashgrabowski89125 ай бұрын

  great video

• 
  @brendawilliams80625 ай бұрын

  Thankyou for the opportunity

• 
  @annguyendang83886 ай бұрын

  Dear Sir, Is there any document supporting mathematics in quantum battery?

• 
  @travman28632 ай бұрын

  Do you mean like? The schrodinger equation: kzread.info/dash/bejne/c4ZmldexitXbmKg.htmlsi=dV_zC95126fHqqJP and The McGinty equation: kzread.info/dash/bejne/o6Fmr6uKocateqw.htmlsi=N2hlVfRZ30tQEdqe

• 
  @travman28638 ай бұрын

  🤔According to this video kzread.info/dash/bejne/p4mfutZsidDQn6w.htmlsi=HKa6mzsehHhexvFV You & everyone studying Quantum batteries are wasting your time and money on this do you agree?🤷‍♂️ 🌐✌ I personally do not believe so and I think the above video link should be taken down for misleading information.👍 Either that or your video is misleading information which I do not believe so.

• 
  @SpotterVideo8 ай бұрын

  Conservation of Spatial Curvature (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

• 
  @shawnwilford7849 ай бұрын

  At around 3:30 there is a mistake, the |+> and |-> should be eigenstates of σy instead of σx, i.e. |+>=(-i|1>+|2>)/\sqrt{2}, |->=(|1>-i|2>)/\sqrt{2}, only then the results matches H=|1><2|-|2><1|=i|+><+|-i|-><-|

• 
  @Miguel_Noether9 ай бұрын

  Just after you thought you knew quantum mechanics....

• 
  @dhimanbhowmick955810 ай бұрын

  Nice talk, thanks to prof.

• 
  @hanzeli909210 ай бұрын

  It's so great!

• 
  @herauthon11 ай бұрын

  1987 : teacher shows me pictures of glaciers - and the shrinking of their size over time - and asks what the result of this temperature raise will be - well yes, more heat.. but i wondered...if it also could mean... more cold.. that did not result in a deeper debate.. jammer - i loved one.

• 
  @shubhamjat692611 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much

• 
  @fartywood391711 ай бұрын

  came here post LK-99 🤣🤣🤣

• 
  @EdT.-xt6yv11 ай бұрын

  19:20 rare earth material

• 
  @Carl-Ernst-Otto-Kunze Жыл бұрын

  Bits traded

• 
  @ryancabell3775 Жыл бұрын

  Let the woman speak lmao

• 
  @craftlinks78666 ай бұрын

  I suspect the audience is very unfamiliar with the topic/field at hand, hence a bunch of (basic science, ha!) questions...

• 
  @user-es7bg7ei9r Жыл бұрын

  Steven, If the Infinite Hotel is a circular building the Night Manager will arrive back at the desk after the 1 minute room check. The circle is infinite, how sweet is That!?

• 
  @rasoulghadimi3546 Жыл бұрын

  thanks for sharing

• 
  @rasoulghadimi3546 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks for sharing this talk

• 
  @dax2439 Жыл бұрын

  A+!!! Want more views? -> *Promosm*!!!

• 
  @syedabubacker7595 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you so much for this lecture! I am working on this topic and I found it very helpful

• 
  @alexssandredeoliveiraj2773 Жыл бұрын

  Very nice talk!

• 
  @samyakkshinde68642 жыл бұрын

  55:44 , Why did he say If epsilon =2 my Hamiltonian is Hermitian? it's clearly not . I think it's just for epsilon >0, PT Symmetry is unbroken. someone please clarify if I misunderstood something here.

• 
  @Miguel_Noether9 ай бұрын

  When epsilon is equal to two, you have H = p^2 - x^4, why is it not hermitian?

• 
  @frankpollmann39982 жыл бұрын

  meow great talk

• 
  @sandralopez6752 жыл бұрын

  Here’s a tip, look for fast hair growth shampoo to double hair growth.

• 
  @makespace84832 жыл бұрын

  For students of QM that have been told to "Shut up and calculate," this lecture will set you on a path to getting the hard questions answered.

• 
  @shubhamjat692611 ай бұрын

  I strongly agree with you

• 
  @martinsoos3 жыл бұрын

  It would have been nice if there was a working model of this system, but more often than not, the math comes first.

• 
  @martinsoos3 жыл бұрын

  I only see side jumps happening when a photon goes through a lattice. When a photon goes through a random scattering of positive and negative charges the bending would be canceled out as randomly as it was maid, but it would impair sharpness of the image would it not. I am guessing.

• 
  @macyduke54092 жыл бұрын

  Yes..I agree....because I understand what you said...yes.......

• 
  @brendawilliams80625 ай бұрын

  I wonder about similar things like the 1.112 and 1.12. A cancelling with a remaining 6. But I just am amatuer with curiosity

• 
  @brendawilliams80625 ай бұрын

  @@macyduke5409maybe something like a 243 0 243 problem

• 
  @designerguy13-photonics3 жыл бұрын

  what a lecture