The Future of Life Institute (FLI) is a nonprofit working to reduce global catastrophic and existential risk from powerful technologies. In particular, FLI focuses on risks from artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, and nuclear weapons.
The Institute's work is made up of three main strands: grantmaking for risk reduction, educational outreach, and advocacy within the United Nations, US government and European Union institutions.
FLI has become one of the world's leading voices on the governance of AI having created one of the earliest and most influential sets of governance principles: the Asilomar AI Principles.
Пікірлер
Personally - ☠️
The stars don't change on human time scales. The Apollo space craft steered by the stars.
I’d definitely be pissed
I find her voice to American quite slow. However enjoyed her interview immensely 😊
This guy said Gus enough times to make me skip it
Just a question. If a machiavellian AGI already exists, is it possible that is it trying to weaken humanity to coordinate (or just distracting it) through geopolitical tensions before it strikes its final blow? I am asking because the timing and the scope of the current geopolitical events is quite suspicious, and also I find the level of risk and brinkmanship involved with certain decisions by major players, incompatible with self preservation
The current demented POTUS has us on the brink. Keep poking the bear, great job. Hope he gets 4 more years! Lol
united states tested missiles around solar eclipse time. Farms in south texas look ugly. Waikiki trees are dying fast. Videos on channel.
This is how it feels to be an average Russian solider.
I’m SOOO in love with ANNIE ❤️ she’s SUCH a a HOTTIE ❤️
bRAZIL, aUSTRALIA AND sOTH aFRICA: "Let's make arrangements to dissipate the smoke and we'll run the world hereafter..."
🤗Annie
I will move to australia lol.
This lady remains silent, with the madness of the Jews, with the Samson option, why,
China is most definitely building on this. There's no way they are ignoring A.I. I do think that pausing means that we are placing safety in the hands of China. Which could be better. I mean, at least they're not Google.
Great conversation, although Liron's audio stream turns to crap half way through.
We could microwave our hotdogs on a stick.
I wish the host would have held up Annies book so i know what it looks like ? So i could buy it !
Google her name, plus “book”.
Did you mean nuclear make earth colder and solve global warming issue?
We need more carbon tax !!!!
I think I’m in LOVE 🥰 with Annie ❤️😂
Same thing in the bikini island
You don't think it strange that a nuke goes off in Japan and 70 years later people are walking around weapons grade uranium that has a supposedly 1.8 billion year halve life
Impossible look at the present wars and the tech they currently use. The missiles they use can't even take out a few apartments in a building strategically placed maybe a few could but this is complete bull
Easy,the world would lose
If the USA continues with their war mongering, then we a may reach the point of nuclear situation
Russia has weapons that cannot be detected by radar, also they have under water weapons that cannot be detected so the briefing is irrelevant
What people do not understand in the U.S. is that Russia has weapons that the U.S. doesn't have. So does China, North Korea, Iran. As of now, our solos are locked down. Sacs in Omaha, Nebraska is locked down. Denver, Colorado is locked down. Their military. Because they know something is happening. All of the doomsday planes from every country are in the air, that can be refueled. These planes carry Nukes. They are just waiting for the order. Look it up!
Its the USA in the busyness of waging war. Making war every single year to boost it's economic growth with the weapons industry and destabilizing areas on the globe where they have difficulty to establish the interest of its capitalist Empire. No other country comes close to the US in systematicly planning and waging war. Russia don't come even close.
Russia are worse
There were some strange ideas in her book. Such as the idea that firestorms would cook survivors in the White House bunker. Earth and concrete are very poor conductors, and if they survived the initial strike, a firestorm-if one occurred would be survivable.
No globe earth no atomic wepons...
usa is dangerous they are the only nation who used nuclear weapons, they are the rogue nation
Gravity shield can protect cities and earth rotation can move city position 240 miles max in 25 minutes so need sensor to detect launch to move earth
Israel is using it now against Gazans.... look on youtube Vienna Conference on Autonomous Weapons Systems - Day 1, 29 April 2024 - also austria defeneds israel use for this and israel denies, but actual footage has come forward showing the use of killer drones and it is going to get worse if people dont look at UN legislations for these weapons and AI
Please do
I guess I'd better move to Australia in the next two years.
The story of human destruction delivered by the voice of an angel ….its poetic😢
Thanks for presenting all this evidence shown in nice flowers, faces, pictures of politicians and political events. Compared to a Pinatubo all nuclear bombs combined are pretty much a joke in regards to relevant amounts of particles blown into the required hights of the atmosphere. ...I`d consider this belive into Nuclear Winter a dangerous wishthinking - but since i do not live even close to a bigger city, i do not really care. The biggest threat is the masses of people in these big cities, so ... the bombs are the answer here. It is all about keeping order and control over chaos. The rest is a game.
🦘
Anyone who wants to know what this will mean for ordinary people should watch _The Day After_ (for free on KZread: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hoOEw8OBg82zk9o.html ) This 1983 movie by Nicholas Meyer is a realistic drama about what a nuclear conflict would do to Lawrence, Kansas, seen through the stories of several families. It is the most watched TV movie in history; 100 million viewers watched its first run. It was shown on Russian TV in 1987.
Humm....at 1:14 Annie is describing a star-siting missile guidance system for sub-launched ICBM/IRBMs. I'm calling BS on this one. I worked in a land-based ICBM system that - once-upon-a-time - had a star-siting guidance system, but it was replaced in the 70s with a fully inertial guidance system. I'm not a Navy guy but I feel strongly that their ICBM/IRBMs are *not* using 60+ year-old guidance technology. Just the technical aspects of using a star-siting system would be outrageously difficult for an ocean-launched missile.
We ordinary citizens can do something about this, if we want to. We have before. In 1980 Reagan was elected. The US began a world-endangering effort to achieve first strike capability with weapons like the MX, IRBMs, and Star Wars. Reagan's Undersecretary of Defense made his famous remark about surviving nuclear war by digging holes: "If there are enough shovels we will all make it". The Reagan Administration planned to integrate the use of new tactical nukes like the neutron bomb into all future wars. This finally scared people into action. Helen Caldecott's Physicians for Social Responsibility went to college campuses giving public all-day lectures to crowded gymnasiums on what life would be like after a nuclear exchange: sports stadiums full of thousands of dying burn victims, the few medical personnel with no anesthetics or drugs, no water, no food, all electronic technology knocked out by EMPs, contaminated cropland, nuclear winter. In 1983 100 million viewers watched _The Day After_ kzread.info/dash/bejne/hoOEw8OBg82zk9o.html a drama about what a nuclear conflict would do to Lawrence, Kansas, becoming the most watched TV movie in history (it still is). Antinuclear marches across the country and editorials in almost every publication showed the deluded old men who were planning our destruction what voters thought about it. In 1987 the INF Treaty banned the destabilizing intermediate range missiles. In 1991 the SALT 1 (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) reduced the number of deployed American and Russian warheads from 6000 to 1600. Many additional treaties have been passed or negotiated. Some of these treaties weren't ratified by Congress, but were observed by both sides anyway.
fear of nuclear war is appeasement of a DICTATOR. We must continue defending OUR democracy even if it starts a nuclear war, because gay marriage in Crimea is non-negotiable. We're the United States for god's sake!
Africa wins at the end..lol
We would all be dead , thats how it would affect us personally, Duhh
Air Born Nukes are fake a nuke can only be ignited on the ground ,and the sun has to be in the right spot, you will never have a nuke go of at night
What is the chance we cat nucleaire war
7:10 PFAS was said to be safe, but they weren't. They were introduced to the market unsafe, marketed as safe and internal research was supressed. Companies never ever did bad things because they expected some monetary gains ^^. His example of a product not coming to the market is a best case scenario of a worst case. How about the worst case scenario of the worst possible case? He claims those have no merrit, so i guess we have to wait till something goes terribly wrong, maybe 20 years down the line when we have cat like intelligent AIs ... i mean we all trust cats ... right ^^
I like to listen to Lecun when he speaks about his models and what should next be addressed, but sersiously, that dude is not the guy you ask about security and safty period. He lives in denail that ever anything bad could be done with his pressusses AI. Meanwhile these years elections will propably suffer under massiv attacks from fake images and videos, more and more capable robots driven by AI are coming on the market and while they sure are not yet T1000, companies like Boston Dynamics already were building them for the military and others still do. 5:30 Therefor saying something would be forever redicoulos is equal to people not long ago claiming AI would never be able to simulate speach to an extant you could fool pretty much anyone with.
5:15 "there could be bad things happening at the lab" That is one variation of something could go wrong yes. Why do labs for biological weapons have certain safty standards and security meassures? Because shit could go wrong. My question is not if something could go wrong, because it always does, but how to prevent it from happening. Saying it would never is just putting your freakin head in the sand.