Now that the ending has been decanonized it's more clear
@terentay45372 күн бұрын
Thi theory Is So good, the ONLY thing I hate about it Is the Gregory beiing a robot, i would love if theres a different explanation to all od this happening
@gigachadpingu30642 күн бұрын
Wasn’t expecting this to make sense. But now my theory has changed
@jan_780fleischer53 күн бұрын
I think burntrap wasnt the mimic. I mean it said he needed power to come back to life and the mimic was there the whole time
@chronicandironic87013 күн бұрын
the real question is Vincent the purple guy, aka the tumblr sexyman alive
@neuplop4 күн бұрын
Someone called "twisted Animatronics" completely plagiarized your video.
@nobbyfirefly574 күн бұрын
The blob could either have some kind of remnant of the souls maybe? maybe like a half that still had anger or something? Or it could just be whatever is left of the ai. Also it's getting hard to keep track of what year it is lol. Or perhaps the fire was just barely able to not kill them? idk
@Fruitjuiceandbananas5 күн бұрын
Papi Michael better not have died
@mailpaper77545 күн бұрын
"Why Michael Afton is (probably) still alive" Because this franchise can't think of new characters Credits
@Vyxse5 күн бұрын
I think the scooper being different doesn't mean that it was redesigned, I just think they changed the old cannon. The old scooper really didn't look like it would do its job anyways, so changing its cannon without any major effects is plausible
@axolofa5 күн бұрын
Is it ever actually said that the FNAF 1 location closes in 1993? I thought it was agreed upon that the place had been left to rot for a bit before we get hired to guard it.
@mimixte6 күн бұрын
I mean, to be fair if mike was down there enough to have rebuild his own room and to have worked on Gregory, he could have changed the scooper himself. After all he knows how it works probably better than anyone since he was scooped. Maybe he was the one who redesigned it
@kalkuttadrop63716 күн бұрын
I've got a fnaf theory about the FNAF 1 location and Phone Guy I'm willing to hand over to anyone, I've been pitching it for years. Interested?
@SansINess538 күн бұрын
unfortunely that michael lost that gyatt after fnaf 6.
@AFoxInFlames8 күн бұрын
I think Mike lived. Not sure how all the pieces fit, im not a good theorist for FNAF, hence why im watching, lol but i think he left.
@MKGames_YT8 күн бұрын
ngl you cooked with this theory
@Skorpeonismyrealname9 күн бұрын
Something I kinda wish people would take into consideration: With the focus on Pizza Sim being a FRANCHISEE location, it brings to light something interesting The opposite of a franchise is a corporation. Imagine if the MCI cause the closing of all CORPORATE locations with all the fancy animatronics and tech, multiple venues with fancy attractions... but left all the FRANCHISED locations open because they're litterally mom and pop pizzas that just have the Freddy skin applied to them with their older broken tech. They kept trying new ways to get their fame and fortune back and not go bankrupt, but it still didn't work and then FNaF 1 happened. Meaning that Fnaf 3 can still take place "30 years after freddy closed its doors [after the MCI.]" And FNaF 1 can still detail the final closing of the final Freddy FRANCHISED location; after the MCI, everything fell so much apart that they couldn't even make a Flagship out of this weird little broom closet that happened to be where all the mess started in the first place. Which was just a recipe for failure even in a sane world.
@vibeaardvark10 күн бұрын
He survived because he stopped dropped and rolled 🤦♂️
@lsice674610 күн бұрын
I’m so glad someone finally stated that matpat never actually said the first game was in 1993 in his first video
@dreamday98811 күн бұрын
About whole “bunny ears” at 15:58 (maybe a bit earlier), with Help Wanted 2 out rn..could it be that Gregory was meeting with Cassy’s dad? Mask bot in Ruin (that is her dad) literally has bunny ears and is associated with Bonny. And being that he was obsessed with PQ games that are connected to Vanny/Glitchyrap maybe he was the one feeding info to Gregory and then Gregory manipulated him to go down into the location? Because, we have to remember that “bad” ending is literally the cannon one since we see bot giving mask to Cassy in Ruin
@victorjackchannel11 күн бұрын
This was some Game Theorists theory level, in a good way!
@jjcdoesstuff12 күн бұрын
I have a short, unnecassary theory but I think Mike left the pizzaria, not because he didn't want to die, but instead because he wanted to make sure William Afton died in that pizzaria. If William had escaped once more, there wouldn't be anyone to stop him as Henry and Michael both died. He could've also just not wanted to die, that's acceptable, I can understand that.
@liran879912 күн бұрын
Occam's razor - often the actual solution is the simplest one Vanessa is Vanny. And even if she has a twin, her making her twin pose as her to be a security guard is overly complicated, and there's no evidence for Vanessa having any sister besides that weird ending
@carimeslockdownedtree265412 күн бұрын
(Before I watched the video) I want him to find peace. Please. Let my boy rest. Please. (After watching the video) DAMN. My boy.... But. Don't robo-greggy on me. I... Ghhhhjhhg Mikey boy,,,,,,,, fucjhhnjhjnkkkk. You have my half-convinced on Mikey, but not on Greggy. Guess we'll have to see how it all develops. I do like to believe Michael is TOYSNHK, because of that one two hour and a half(?) long video. So if Michael is alive, i wonder what that would mean for his role in William's hell. Because yes to me it's indiscutible now that Mike is TOYSNHK and that Henry is Old Man Consequences. Hmmmmmmm. Oh well. To me, there's pre-VR lore, and post-VR lore. If post-VR retroactively change the lore before it, it goes into a secondary compartment in my brain labeled "soft reset changes". I can choose to engage with the soft reset changes or not. But that seems like such a big change, if it does happen, and arghhh. Goddammit, why is fnaf lore like this. I hate it. Please make sense. Be consistent and don't retcon stuffffff.gnngghg And wow, huh, i never realized the thing about the ffps and pizzaplex placements. Interesting. Hehe the FAM. Nice...
@Fortnite_lover.12 күн бұрын
Not trying to be rude but your voice sort of sounds like Daffy duck
@Idk-fj8is12 күн бұрын
“gangMIMIC”
@noravanguard399313 күн бұрын
You and Gibi are like the only two people i can think of that talk about fnaf 1 being in 1992 and fnaf 3 being in 2015. It's been so long that it seems most poetry forget where the original info for what the fandom think is facts comes from. It was the wild west of theorizing back then so some wild ideals stuck specially if game theory said them No hate on matt and his crew It's not his fault that people didn't do their own research when making video or his viewer posting what he said as gospel But I think a lot of fnaf theories forget to look back and wonder if they got something wrong and need to rethink things through again with the current info we have Also mangle probably existed before Fnaf 2. Because the wording to describe it implies the kids ripping it apart was a ling lasting issue. And fnaf 2 pizzeria was only open for i think 2 weeks. One week for the 1st night gaurd one week for the 2nd night gaurd and one night for the 3rd night gaurd.
@gagstacc597813 күн бұрын
Mike could be alive ill give you that but what i wont give you is that Springtrap in security breach cant be minic because in fnaf vr the lore was william uploaded his consciousness into that game and thats what all the tapes you find are.
@alfiecoolkidgamez13 күн бұрын
19:33 also the fact that in the Burntrap battle, there’s a vent above the desk, and two doors on the left and right, so it could be the SL location
@BlueSpartan55114 күн бұрын
The "real value" might have been because Scott made it in 2015
@BlueSpartan55114 күн бұрын
Hearing this, micheal might have found hints of burntrap, but couldn't enter. So he sends you to find out if burntrap is really William
@esme610015 күн бұрын
the 2015 date for fnaf 3, and the 1992 date for fnaf 1, somewhat make sense.. except for one thing. that'd place william's springlocking in 1985, which.. just could not be possible with him being alive and killing kids at the fnaf 2 location (the dci) a similar problem comes up with it being in 1987 too, since the minigame for the springlocking is very clearly the fnaf 1 location. it somewhat works if you say the fnaf 1 location is the same as the original freddy's location, as i've heard that claim so much that i'm pretty sure it's true, but then why would the puppet not be in that location (when we know it at least Was there before fnaf 2) while the unwithereds Are? at first i excused the lack of the puppet in the minigame as it already having been shipped off to the fnaf 2 location, but there's no real reason that the unwithereds wouldn't be shipped off too. though, it could be that the five spirits that scare william into his springlock are just the one linked to the mci; susie, fritz, gabriel, jeremy, and charlie. the lack of the crying child spirit there is questionable, but could technically be brushed off by the springlock suits in the original freddy's being moved 'to an appropriate location to be looked at by technicians' after the springlock incidents at another location. still, they would've been moved in, at most, 1983, since fredbear's closed in 1983. i'm not sure they'd still be in that place by 1987, but maybe. another problem there'd be with the springlocking in 1987 is with your idea that sister location is after fnaf 1. this would mean it'd be after fnaf 2 as well, so.. how would william ask michael to go put elizabeth back together? unless he was told in, at most, 1987, and he just.. didn't go until at least after 1992, and he still said, 'hey, dad, i did that thing you wanted me to do' five years later. that doesn't make much sense to me. i also don't think sister location would be after fnaf 1 anyways because i doubt the handunit would be tooting their own horn about how circus baby's entertainment and rentals opened after freddy's closed if another freddy's opened While they were open. because of this, i usually place sister location at happening sometime between at least 1985 and early 1987. it being in early 1987 would explain how william was able to ask michael to put her back together while not dead; he'd ask a bit before he was springlocked. it's a stretch, sure, but springlocking in 1987 is a stretch either way, since if freddy's closed in 1985, why wouldn't william just go get more remnant from the animatronics there.. in 1985? but honestly, either way sister location is a little foggy with william's springlocking, since there's always the question of how he'd have remnant before taking apart the animatronics to get it. i've juggled the idea around a lot, and it's either a retcon, an overlook, or he got some from the original incident in 1983 and just went back for more later. or, y'know, the time between the 5th minigame and the 6th minigame in fnaf 4 is two years. it'd match with my theory of the phone guy recordings in fnaf 3 being in 1983 except the one about the safe room sealings (because otherwise, william's springlocking would be in 1983 since we know the room had to have been sealed after he was springlocked. unless, of course, phone guy's line about the rooms being sealed in most locations didn't apply to the third location, and so william Wasn't actually sealed in the room for 30 years, he just.. got a big boo boo and couldn't get up the whole time) there's also the fact that there.. wouldn't be animatronics in the original closed freddy's in 1987 after fnaf 2. they'd be in a warehouse somewhere, or something.. that is, unless the third pizzeria opened in 1987 after the fnaf 2 location closed, and the withered animatronics were fixed up within 1987, and then william took apart the animatronics at the newly opened third location Also in 1987, and then they got put back together after he broke them, and they just repossessed the animatronics for fnaf 1 to work... and a little bit of time before he died he also told michael to go put elizabeth back together which would place sister location in mid to late 1987.... that's possibly the most convoluted sentence related to fnaf that i've ever written anyways, all that messy stuff aside, i liked watching this! it really got me thinking 👍
@Wizardjones6913 күн бұрын
30 years is after the mci, afton would still be springlocked in 2001
@esme610013 күн бұрын
@@Wizardjones692001? that'd put fnaf 3 at 2031, though. the 2015 and 2017 dates they were talking about were referring to when fnaf 3 took place, which would mean william's springlocking would take place in either 1985 or 1987 depending on the year due to fnaf 3 being 30 years after freddy's closed, and therefore about 30 years after william's springlocking since the safe room was likely to have been sealed soon before a freddy's closed, as it cites budget restrictions for the reasoning
@Wizardjones6913 күн бұрын
@@esme6100 they are talking about the clousure of the mci location because of the 26 june, not the springlock failure from follow me duh
@Wizardjones6913 күн бұрын
@@esme6100 they are not talking about fnaf 1 closing in 1992, they are talking about 1985 closing mci 1985 > fnaf 1 1992 > follow me 2001 > fnaf 3 2015 30 years after 1985 why in 2001? because of dittophobia and molten mci
@esme610013 күн бұрын
@@Wizardjones69i get what you're saying but the whole reason people say william was in the safe room for 30 years before being found for fazbear frights is because the safe rooms were sealed, otherwise he could've just left because he can clearly walk in fnaf 3. so for that 2001 springlocking to work then the third pizzeria in 1992 would have to be open until 2001 for the safe rooms to be sealed as said in the phone guy recordings. but phone guy couldn't have recorded that tape in 2001 because he died in 1992. and a side note, the games have a mainly different timeline continuity as said by scott himself, and that's supported by how in one book there's 6 dead children instead of 5, and they weren't even missing since they weren't stuffed in suits. the books share elements of the games, like similar events and characters and such, but they aren't strictly lining out the games' events. they reflect some game details because they were apparently made because the fnaf lore in the game was too complicated or convoluted to be made into books, so that's why there's so many split stories.
@Karymt15 күн бұрын
I hope they dont end up making mike gay
@flouter15 күн бұрын
9:43 acerola moment
@JiarxAndPickleShow15 күн бұрын
I believe this theory, and I thought of this theory on my own as well, great minds think alike?
@MarvelousButter17 күн бұрын
I love this theory
@ym-ninja322117 күн бұрын
Michael making a robot in the image of his brother makes a lot of sense
@JodaroKujo18 күн бұрын
People taking a child eating a popsicle too seriously 😂
@Door.18 күн бұрын
I just found your channel and ngl you are already close to being on the same level, even higher, then matpat/game theory's fnaf videos in my mind. You are actually amazing (I've only watched one video pls)
@F1ameXeon19 күн бұрын
Tbh i don't like this theory mut i do think it is very likely to be true which is fine.
@ToaArcan20 күн бұрын
Given that the books are (probably) canon, I think William still survived the fire. He's the titular Man in Room 1280, and he eventually goes on to become a giant trash monster rabbit or whatever the Frights finale was. He's probably not Burntrap, he's probably still dead, but he died in the books rather than the games because FNaF lore is all about the books now. Heaven forbid major plot points and characters be introduced in a videogame or something, people might start to think this is a _game franchise._ (That last sentence is mostly a joke. Mostly) I straight-up do not think Henry was right about fire destroying Remnant. At all. Henry is... not the most stable support on the bridge by the time of FNaF6, and we've seen William survive a fire before. We know he didn't leave the FNaF3 location before the flames got too hot, because he was still in there when the salvage crews arrived to auction off what was left. "Fire will kill Remnant" is the theory of a crazy person, and we have hard evidence from Springtrap's continued existence that possessed robots can survive being burned. So yeah, Michael's probably still alive.
@evandroescutatrap13120 күн бұрын
Idk this probably has been said before but I feel the last line in the encoded message could mean "do whatever, you will succeed *anyway* ". Don't cry, don't fear, don't have hope, it doesn't matter. You're bond to save them.
@L15t3n_Editz21 күн бұрын
Yall.. just a random thought... what if ennard was the mimic? Ik i might be wrong but what ifff
@PhantomGato-v-21 күн бұрын
I swear, people didn't know some of these? I figured some of this this out when I bought the book as a kid-
@witherkilleryeh22 күн бұрын
I think the fredbear and freddy merged character should be called "freddybear", Freddy's very old name and nickname for the Nightmare Fredbear and Nightmare Freddy texture merge in help wanted
@TransCatgirlPegger22 күн бұрын
6:44 no way
@saeklin22 күн бұрын
There is too much conflicting evidence to definitively say what Vanessa and Vanny are. If you throw in HW2, it gets even more confusing. Personally, I think Patient 46 is either Vanny or Luis, and definitely NOT Gregory. Gregory is just some orphan that was squatting at the Pizza Plex and became a wrench in Burntrap's plan, just like how Cassie stumbles in and deals with the mimic. Vanessa's therapy sessions and the whole "Vanny sounds like Vanessa plus bunny" thing is all a bunch of red herrings. The twist shown in the rooftop fire ending is proof enough for me that it's two separate women. That's not a ghost on the rooftop, it's Vanessa looking down in horror at her dead accomplice and having the realization that Burntrap/Glitchtrap won't release her mind.
@saeklin22 күн бұрын
I believe that the "off the clock" scenes in Sister Location were in a break room that resembled a living room. Mike wasn't returning home, he was chilling in the break room in the facility. In the other ending to SL, Ennard appears in the room, but how? It couldn't escape without a disguise, right? If it needed a human disguise to escape, but shows up in the room still looking like that, then it means the room was within the SL complex the whole time. I don't know if that is what Scott intended, but it is what Security Breach implies.
Пікірлер
Your theory makes so much sense
Bro im long gone
Now that the ending has been decanonized it's more clear
Thi theory Is So good, the ONLY thing I hate about it Is the Gregory beiing a robot, i would love if theres a different explanation to all od this happening
Wasn’t expecting this to make sense. But now my theory has changed
I think burntrap wasnt the mimic. I mean it said he needed power to come back to life and the mimic was there the whole time
the real question is Vincent the purple guy, aka the tumblr sexyman alive
Someone called "twisted Animatronics" completely plagiarized your video.
The blob could either have some kind of remnant of the souls maybe? maybe like a half that still had anger or something? Or it could just be whatever is left of the ai. Also it's getting hard to keep track of what year it is lol. Or perhaps the fire was just barely able to not kill them? idk
Papi Michael better not have died
"Why Michael Afton is (probably) still alive" Because this franchise can't think of new characters Credits
I think the scooper being different doesn't mean that it was redesigned, I just think they changed the old cannon. The old scooper really didn't look like it would do its job anyways, so changing its cannon without any major effects is plausible
Is it ever actually said that the FNAF 1 location closes in 1993? I thought it was agreed upon that the place had been left to rot for a bit before we get hired to guard it.
I mean, to be fair if mike was down there enough to have rebuild his own room and to have worked on Gregory, he could have changed the scooper himself. After all he knows how it works probably better than anyone since he was scooped. Maybe he was the one who redesigned it
I've got a fnaf theory about the FNAF 1 location and Phone Guy I'm willing to hand over to anyone, I've been pitching it for years. Interested?
unfortunely that michael lost that gyatt after fnaf 6.
I think Mike lived. Not sure how all the pieces fit, im not a good theorist for FNAF, hence why im watching, lol but i think he left.
ngl you cooked with this theory
Something I kinda wish people would take into consideration: With the focus on Pizza Sim being a FRANCHISEE location, it brings to light something interesting The opposite of a franchise is a corporation. Imagine if the MCI cause the closing of all CORPORATE locations with all the fancy animatronics and tech, multiple venues with fancy attractions... but left all the FRANCHISED locations open because they're litterally mom and pop pizzas that just have the Freddy skin applied to them with their older broken tech. They kept trying new ways to get their fame and fortune back and not go bankrupt, but it still didn't work and then FNaF 1 happened. Meaning that Fnaf 3 can still take place "30 years after freddy closed its doors [after the MCI.]" And FNaF 1 can still detail the final closing of the final Freddy FRANCHISED location; after the MCI, everything fell so much apart that they couldn't even make a Flagship out of this weird little broom closet that happened to be where all the mess started in the first place. Which was just a recipe for failure even in a sane world.
He survived because he stopped dropped and rolled 🤦♂️
I’m so glad someone finally stated that matpat never actually said the first game was in 1993 in his first video
About whole “bunny ears” at 15:58 (maybe a bit earlier), with Help Wanted 2 out rn..could it be that Gregory was meeting with Cassy’s dad? Mask bot in Ruin (that is her dad) literally has bunny ears and is associated with Bonny. And being that he was obsessed with PQ games that are connected to Vanny/Glitchyrap maybe he was the one feeding info to Gregory and then Gregory manipulated him to go down into the location? Because, we have to remember that “bad” ending is literally the cannon one since we see bot giving mask to Cassy in Ruin
This was some Game Theorists theory level, in a good way!
I have a short, unnecassary theory but I think Mike left the pizzaria, not because he didn't want to die, but instead because he wanted to make sure William Afton died in that pizzaria. If William had escaped once more, there wouldn't be anyone to stop him as Henry and Michael both died. He could've also just not wanted to die, that's acceptable, I can understand that.
Occam's razor - often the actual solution is the simplest one Vanessa is Vanny. And even if she has a twin, her making her twin pose as her to be a security guard is overly complicated, and there's no evidence for Vanessa having any sister besides that weird ending
(Before I watched the video) I want him to find peace. Please. Let my boy rest. Please. (After watching the video) DAMN. My boy.... But. Don't robo-greggy on me. I... Ghhhhjhhg Mikey boy,,,,,,,, fucjhhnjhjnkkkk. You have my half-convinced on Mikey, but not on Greggy. Guess we'll have to see how it all develops. I do like to believe Michael is TOYSNHK, because of that one two hour and a half(?) long video. So if Michael is alive, i wonder what that would mean for his role in William's hell. Because yes to me it's indiscutible now that Mike is TOYSNHK and that Henry is Old Man Consequences. Hmmmmmmm. Oh well. To me, there's pre-VR lore, and post-VR lore. If post-VR retroactively change the lore before it, it goes into a secondary compartment in my brain labeled "soft reset changes". I can choose to engage with the soft reset changes or not. But that seems like such a big change, if it does happen, and arghhh. Goddammit, why is fnaf lore like this. I hate it. Please make sense. Be consistent and don't retcon stuffffff.gnngghg And wow, huh, i never realized the thing about the ffps and pizzaplex placements. Interesting. Hehe the FAM. Nice...
Not trying to be rude but your voice sort of sounds like Daffy duck
“gangMIMIC”
You and Gibi are like the only two people i can think of that talk about fnaf 1 being in 1992 and fnaf 3 being in 2015. It's been so long that it seems most poetry forget where the original info for what the fandom think is facts comes from. It was the wild west of theorizing back then so some wild ideals stuck specially if game theory said them No hate on matt and his crew It's not his fault that people didn't do their own research when making video or his viewer posting what he said as gospel But I think a lot of fnaf theories forget to look back and wonder if they got something wrong and need to rethink things through again with the current info we have Also mangle probably existed before Fnaf 2. Because the wording to describe it implies the kids ripping it apart was a ling lasting issue. And fnaf 2 pizzeria was only open for i think 2 weeks. One week for the 1st night gaurd one week for the 2nd night gaurd and one night for the 3rd night gaurd.
Mike could be alive ill give you that but what i wont give you is that Springtrap in security breach cant be minic because in fnaf vr the lore was william uploaded his consciousness into that game and thats what all the tapes you find are.
19:33 also the fact that in the Burntrap battle, there’s a vent above the desk, and two doors on the left and right, so it could be the SL location
The "real value" might have been because Scott made it in 2015
Hearing this, micheal might have found hints of burntrap, but couldn't enter. So he sends you to find out if burntrap is really William
the 2015 date for fnaf 3, and the 1992 date for fnaf 1, somewhat make sense.. except for one thing. that'd place william's springlocking in 1985, which.. just could not be possible with him being alive and killing kids at the fnaf 2 location (the dci) a similar problem comes up with it being in 1987 too, since the minigame for the springlocking is very clearly the fnaf 1 location. it somewhat works if you say the fnaf 1 location is the same as the original freddy's location, as i've heard that claim so much that i'm pretty sure it's true, but then why would the puppet not be in that location (when we know it at least Was there before fnaf 2) while the unwithereds Are? at first i excused the lack of the puppet in the minigame as it already having been shipped off to the fnaf 2 location, but there's no real reason that the unwithereds wouldn't be shipped off too. though, it could be that the five spirits that scare william into his springlock are just the one linked to the mci; susie, fritz, gabriel, jeremy, and charlie. the lack of the crying child spirit there is questionable, but could technically be brushed off by the springlock suits in the original freddy's being moved 'to an appropriate location to be looked at by technicians' after the springlock incidents at another location. still, they would've been moved in, at most, 1983, since fredbear's closed in 1983. i'm not sure they'd still be in that place by 1987, but maybe. another problem there'd be with the springlocking in 1987 is with your idea that sister location is after fnaf 1. this would mean it'd be after fnaf 2 as well, so.. how would william ask michael to go put elizabeth back together? unless he was told in, at most, 1987, and he just.. didn't go until at least after 1992, and he still said, 'hey, dad, i did that thing you wanted me to do' five years later. that doesn't make much sense to me. i also don't think sister location would be after fnaf 1 anyways because i doubt the handunit would be tooting their own horn about how circus baby's entertainment and rentals opened after freddy's closed if another freddy's opened While they were open. because of this, i usually place sister location at happening sometime between at least 1985 and early 1987. it being in early 1987 would explain how william was able to ask michael to put her back together while not dead; he'd ask a bit before he was springlocked. it's a stretch, sure, but springlocking in 1987 is a stretch either way, since if freddy's closed in 1985, why wouldn't william just go get more remnant from the animatronics there.. in 1985? but honestly, either way sister location is a little foggy with william's springlocking, since there's always the question of how he'd have remnant before taking apart the animatronics to get it. i've juggled the idea around a lot, and it's either a retcon, an overlook, or he got some from the original incident in 1983 and just went back for more later. or, y'know, the time between the 5th minigame and the 6th minigame in fnaf 4 is two years. it'd match with my theory of the phone guy recordings in fnaf 3 being in 1983 except the one about the safe room sealings (because otherwise, william's springlocking would be in 1983 since we know the room had to have been sealed after he was springlocked. unless, of course, phone guy's line about the rooms being sealed in most locations didn't apply to the third location, and so william Wasn't actually sealed in the room for 30 years, he just.. got a big boo boo and couldn't get up the whole time) there's also the fact that there.. wouldn't be animatronics in the original closed freddy's in 1987 after fnaf 2. they'd be in a warehouse somewhere, or something.. that is, unless the third pizzeria opened in 1987 after the fnaf 2 location closed, and the withered animatronics were fixed up within 1987, and then william took apart the animatronics at the newly opened third location Also in 1987, and then they got put back together after he broke them, and they just repossessed the animatronics for fnaf 1 to work... and a little bit of time before he died he also told michael to go put elizabeth back together which would place sister location in mid to late 1987.... that's possibly the most convoluted sentence related to fnaf that i've ever written anyways, all that messy stuff aside, i liked watching this! it really got me thinking 👍
30 years is after the mci, afton would still be springlocked in 2001
@@Wizardjones692001? that'd put fnaf 3 at 2031, though. the 2015 and 2017 dates they were talking about were referring to when fnaf 3 took place, which would mean william's springlocking would take place in either 1985 or 1987 depending on the year due to fnaf 3 being 30 years after freddy's closed, and therefore about 30 years after william's springlocking since the safe room was likely to have been sealed soon before a freddy's closed, as it cites budget restrictions for the reasoning
@@esme6100 they are talking about the clousure of the mci location because of the 26 june, not the springlock failure from follow me duh
@@esme6100 they are not talking about fnaf 1 closing in 1992, they are talking about 1985 closing mci 1985 > fnaf 1 1992 > follow me 2001 > fnaf 3 2015 30 years after 1985 why in 2001? because of dittophobia and molten mci
@@Wizardjones69i get what you're saying but the whole reason people say william was in the safe room for 30 years before being found for fazbear frights is because the safe rooms were sealed, otherwise he could've just left because he can clearly walk in fnaf 3. so for that 2001 springlocking to work then the third pizzeria in 1992 would have to be open until 2001 for the safe rooms to be sealed as said in the phone guy recordings. but phone guy couldn't have recorded that tape in 2001 because he died in 1992. and a side note, the games have a mainly different timeline continuity as said by scott himself, and that's supported by how in one book there's 6 dead children instead of 5, and they weren't even missing since they weren't stuffed in suits. the books share elements of the games, like similar events and characters and such, but they aren't strictly lining out the games' events. they reflect some game details because they were apparently made because the fnaf lore in the game was too complicated or convoluted to be made into books, so that's why there's so many split stories.
I hope they dont end up making mike gay
9:43 acerola moment
I believe this theory, and I thought of this theory on my own as well, great minds think alike?
I love this theory
Michael making a robot in the image of his brother makes a lot of sense
People taking a child eating a popsicle too seriously 😂
I just found your channel and ngl you are already close to being on the same level, even higher, then matpat/game theory's fnaf videos in my mind. You are actually amazing (I've only watched one video pls)
Tbh i don't like this theory mut i do think it is very likely to be true which is fine.
Given that the books are (probably) canon, I think William still survived the fire. He's the titular Man in Room 1280, and he eventually goes on to become a giant trash monster rabbit or whatever the Frights finale was. He's probably not Burntrap, he's probably still dead, but he died in the books rather than the games because FNaF lore is all about the books now. Heaven forbid major plot points and characters be introduced in a videogame or something, people might start to think this is a _game franchise._ (That last sentence is mostly a joke. Mostly) I straight-up do not think Henry was right about fire destroying Remnant. At all. Henry is... not the most stable support on the bridge by the time of FNaF6, and we've seen William survive a fire before. We know he didn't leave the FNaF3 location before the flames got too hot, because he was still in there when the salvage crews arrived to auction off what was left. "Fire will kill Remnant" is the theory of a crazy person, and we have hard evidence from Springtrap's continued existence that possessed robots can survive being burned. So yeah, Michael's probably still alive.
Idk this probably has been said before but I feel the last line in the encoded message could mean "do whatever, you will succeed *anyway* ". Don't cry, don't fear, don't have hope, it doesn't matter. You're bond to save them.
Yall.. just a random thought... what if ennard was the mimic? Ik i might be wrong but what ifff
I swear, people didn't know some of these? I figured some of this this out when I bought the book as a kid-
I think the fredbear and freddy merged character should be called "freddybear", Freddy's very old name and nickname for the Nightmare Fredbear and Nightmare Freddy texture merge in help wanted
6:44 no way
There is too much conflicting evidence to definitively say what Vanessa and Vanny are. If you throw in HW2, it gets even more confusing. Personally, I think Patient 46 is either Vanny or Luis, and definitely NOT Gregory. Gregory is just some orphan that was squatting at the Pizza Plex and became a wrench in Burntrap's plan, just like how Cassie stumbles in and deals with the mimic. Vanessa's therapy sessions and the whole "Vanny sounds like Vanessa plus bunny" thing is all a bunch of red herrings. The twist shown in the rooftop fire ending is proof enough for me that it's two separate women. That's not a ghost on the rooftop, it's Vanessa looking down in horror at her dead accomplice and having the realization that Burntrap/Glitchtrap won't release her mind.
I believe that the "off the clock" scenes in Sister Location were in a break room that resembled a living room. Mike wasn't returning home, he was chilling in the break room in the facility. In the other ending to SL, Ennard appears in the room, but how? It couldn't escape without a disguise, right? If it needed a human disguise to escape, but shows up in the room still looking like that, then it means the room was within the SL complex the whole time. I don't know if that is what Scott intended, but it is what Security Breach implies.